This was not unexpected. For Chutkan to recuse herself she would have to admit “bias.” Judge Chutkan denies she carries bias, ergo she refuses to recuse herself from the Trump prosecution. [SEE Ruling HERE]
[Read Ruling Here]
Please keep in mind all judges in the DC District expected this. That’s why they sat in the back of the courtroom during the Trump indictment proceedings. {Go Deep}
While she worked for Boies Schiller, her firm represented Glenn Simpson and Fusion GPS against Congress. {Go Deep} Additionally, Boies Schiller was representing Hunter Biden in his legal defense. Chutkan is enmeshed in the original Russiagate storyline and the later developing Hunter Biden storyline, in addition to her activist work against the J6 defendants.
So in other words, the railroading continues unchecked?
Just wait until they run the 2020 Election Play again with the new hand selected democrat. They know how to win them now. And how to step on their political opponents throats in the aftermath. While the republicans do nothing.
In a few years the Republican party will be as extinct as the Whigs.
You are right if they don’t begin to defend their own
In less than a few years the republic will be extinct.
Sure is a small legal talent puddle they have in DC.
I think that women is conflicted out even ruling on my dead grandfather’s estate and he has been past for over 30 years. Lol
You speaking for yourself?
Hello!
what can be done to replace her?
She is there for life unless she is impeached which will never happen.
I assume he meant from the case
Chutkan can be removed by a superior Judge, IIRC.
Recusal is a set-inflicted removal, yet if there are any other adults in the court system, she can be forcibly removed.
This is DC, remembet? So we can forget about there being any “adults” in the system. They’re all drunk on power.
Why would we want to replace a judge so obviously compromised? A guilty verdict in DC is a foregone conclusion no matter who is presiding. Obvious railroad job is obvious, which will further solidify Trump’s Republican base of support and pull even more independents over to his side. This case is going to get sorted out on appeal. Besides Trump can always pardon himself after winning. Consider me an optimist.
But the appeal is outside the material timeline. They aren’t trying to put anyone in prison. This is about the theater, while carefully limiting admissible evidence from J6. Impede the campaign while continuing to pretend J6 was an organic armed insurrection. Tough to do, the advantage lies with the DS and absurdly unAmerican DC courts.
On that note, why is DC allowed to man federal courts.
Just work your way up the appeals. Absolutely all of this, including the civil suit, are going to end up in the SCOTUS one way or the other
SCOTUS has the Constitutional authority to reach down into any matter and take it up and make a ruling.
I think it is time, past time, for them to flex their muscles and use their authority to straighten out this mess.
Unfortunately, they’ve got Clarence Thomas by the balls and the McConnell appointed Kavanaugh and Coney Barrett are actually Deep Statists. Not to mention Bushie RINO John Roberts.
LOL, yeah, right! SCOTUS could’ve spared us all this BS if they didn’t punt the Texas election case in 2020 and ruled on the merits. Roberts, Gorsuch, Kavenaugh and Barrett are spineless pieces of sh*t.
… the process is the punishment…
The problem is the timing. The media will have buried the story by then, while running huge banners implying that the totally impartial DC clowns’ decision means GUILTY.
Nothing. All Trump can do is appeal it to SCOTUS. But you can never count on squishes like Roberts and Kavanaugh.
Great, more ammo for appeals. Better late than never I guess.
By the time the entire trial, motions and appeals have run their course the election will already be decided and the damage will be irreversible. That is what they are counting on. After that if the Dems retain power all her violations will be excused. If they don’t she will become the new heroine of “The Resistance” part two.
Yes.
The Communist Conspiracy marches on, ever more brazenly; the Godless know not shame.
We must abolish the entire DC Court system, all Federal Trials and Grand Juries must be conducted in the State and district of the targeted Citizen, the DC Star Chamber is an unConstitutional tyrannical abomination.
Largely agree with your idea of abolishing the DC Court system. A better approach however would be to abolish all of DC which would make the world a better place
That does sound nice, but we needn’t go overboard, simply abide the Constitution and rectify the offenses against its letter and spirit.
We need actionable and reasonably effective Restoration of the Republic goals.
We must be level-headed and cognizant of what would effectuate a Restoration and what would simply be a feeding frenzy of destructive anger and terror, we have the French to thank for their warning example of the latter.
Still, I, too, have ought against all of DC, and have several asteroids on back order.
“…. simply abide the Constitution and rectify the offenses against its letter and spirit.”
How is that going to happen?
In my view nothing will happen until the 75 + million Trump voters make their numbers and demands known by showing up in the tens of millions.
the current system has failed, we should learn that from the French.
We are in the process of effectuating a peaceful revolution.
Should that be thwarted things will get spicy.
As long as our Champion sees a way forward and bids us follow him, we shall do so, not a single act of violence will further his cause, in fact, a single such could create tremendous destruction to MAGA.
We will see what happens.
Amen, brother! 👊
The uniparty and especially the leftist understand how powerful a massive peaceful demonstration would be. Public demonstration has been the go to strategy for a long time for the leftists. Those mf-ers already have their preparation plan all in place to deter demonstrations. Arrest and convict to make an example of what will happen to you if you do that. Remember to them we are all right wing domestic terrorists and that now gives them have the legal authority to make minor civil discourse petty crimes into 20 year prison sentences. That powerful messages has been sent and continues to be sent ergo January 6th. We need a repeat of April 15th 2009. That was the day we had the first massive tea party march in DC. Satellite imaging of DC that was released months later show almost 2 MILLION people in attendance. And they left the streets spotless after the March was over! Obama flew over in his helicopter on the his way to his jet. He was asked the next day what he thought and he replied he did not see anything. ha The stage is set for 6 million plus in attendance march of DC. The odds are less now that will happen because of the persecution of J6ers. Sad but true. I pray there are enough of us to overcome those odds so 5 million people still make that March! With everything that has happened after J6 we can be smarter as we now know what they are capable of doing to create False Flag events. The ability of a massive March is what our beloved Constitution grants, hopefully peaceably, although when tyranny is involved armed insurrection is not ruled out.
The uniparty and especially the leftist understand how powerful a massive peaceful demonstration would be. Public demonstration has been the go to strategy for a long time for the leftists. Those mf-ers already have their preparation plan all in place to deter demonstrations. Arrest and convict to make an example of what will happen to you if you do that. Remember to them we are all right wing domestic terrorists and that now gives them have the legal authority to make minor civil discourse petty crimes into 20 year prison sentences. That powerful messages has been sent and continues to be sent ergo January 6th. We need a repeat of April 15th 2009. That was the day we had the first massive tea party march in DC. Satellite imaging of DC that was released months later show almost 2 MILLION people in attendance. And they left the streets spotless after the March was over! Obama flew over in his helicopter on the his way to his jet. He was asked the next day what he thought and he replied he did not see anything. ha The stage is set for 6 million plus in attendance march of DG. The odds are less now that will happen because of the persecution of J6ers. Sad but true. I pray there are enough of us to overcome those odds so 5 million people still make that March! With everything that has happened after J6 we can be smarter as we now know what they are capable of doing to create False Flag events. The ability of a massive March is what our beloved Constitution grants, hopefully peaceably, although when tyranny is involved armed insurrection is not rulled out.
Things could get interesting if 100 million tax payers stop paying any federal taxes for awhile…But thats a different timeframe as a massive March on Washington DC
Would make a nice museum…with a LOT of statues.
Trump could turn it into a nice private club.
Massive Jumbo Miniature Golf!!!!!
Oh, what fun!!!! ❤️
Better yet, abolish the ‘corporate charter’ for the District of Columbia and its ‘contract’ to administer the federal government of the United States FOR America, instead of the United States OF America.
For the those ‘with eyes to see, and ears to hear.’
The place is rancid. Like black plague rancid.
Indeed.
Let’s make County Sheriffs great again.
… more and more, the US now has judges foaming at the mouth like they used to have in totalitarian regimes. And the tragedy is that it doesn’t seem to bother too many people!
I’ll let Robert Barnes to explain it best in 10 minutes
https://rumble.com/v3it7ve-trump-finally-makes-motion-top-recuse-d.c.-judge-chutkan-viva-and-barnes-hi.html
Seems like the threshold for getting Chutka replaced is very, very low and based on her previous statements and clients she would be replaced!
So why wasn’t she replaced if the threshold is so low???
Well, just like serial criminals, they do it until they’re caught. That’s why everything this judge is doing by denying any wrongdoing will be her undoing.
They do it until they are stopped –
think Ted Bundy – caught several times –
talked his way out – escaped – whatever it took
Ted’s criminal drive stopped when they convicted him and fried his brain pan….
She is the one who has to recuse herself. She wants to be able to railroad him.
Self-recusal, as we are all aware, is simply another tool in the hands of corrupt human beings. This is another process that protects the guilty and subjects the innocent to tyranny, not based on a law but based on a unilateral control of the process.
This self-recusal privilege with no oversight, even with overwhelming evidence of conflict of interest and bias, must be removed. As well as all other tools used by the tyrants.
It is all corrupt, all of it. All the way up.
…from the charwoman to the chairman…rotten.
Ask Rudolph Contreras…
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-flynn-idUSKBN1E202V
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2017/12/12/a-transparent-lack-of-media-curiosity-why-was-judge-rudolph-contreras-recused-from-flynn-case/
His name came up in the Strzok and Page emails. Dinner parties, etc. Contreras did not recuse himself. He was removed.
I’m wondering if the defense is contemplating requesting a bench trial in the event this exercise in prosecutorial misconduct ever makes it to trial.
A DC jury comprised of mouth-breathing democrats is a likely slam dunk conviction for Hack Smith.
That would take the spotlight off the corrupt mechanism and absolve both Smith and this hate-filled Marxist judge Chutkan from any further responsibility. Why not put the onus on HER? Let HER make the call. Let her be the solitary person with the eyes of the entire world (especially the SCOTUS) weighing the evidence.
The morons of the jury can vote to convict and go on their merry way with nothing to risk, but this judge has a career and reputation to think about. . . . . Especially if she’s trying a case involving a sitting president, which could very likely be the case.
The problem they are going to run into is that a conviction earns them nothing. Trump can still run for President. He can still be placed on the ballot. His voters can still write in his name by the tens of millions. He could still be elected president as the nation’s first write-in candidate and do so with 38-40% of the popular vote. (with the Democrat-Republican Government Party candidates each getting about 30-35%).
In fact, convictions will improve Pres. Trump’s popularity with the public because absolutely nobody is fooled by this.
And the “nobody is fooled by this” is something they need to start weaving into their defense responses to the Court. “This prosecution is not being conducted because a crime has been committed – no crime has been committed at all – it is being carried out specifically to attack the chief political opponent of the sitting US president and nothing more.”
There are Dem instigated lawsuits in at least 20 States and soon to be all 50, with Colorado leading the way, attempting to REMOVE Trump from the ballot under the pretext of saying he violated the “removal clause” of the XIV Amendment (14A section 3.) That clause disqualifies a person from ever holding office if guilty of “insurrection.”
If any of those lawsuits stand and they succeed in removing him from the ballot those States will also be obliged to NOT COUNT write-in votes for Trump because he would be held to be ineligible to hold the office.
Of course all of this Lawfare is bunk. Trump has never been charged let alone convicted of insurrection but that never stops Democrats. The 14A only applies to other offices, not POTUS or VPOTUS. But again, none of this stops Democrats. All they need is a few Leftist judges and Leftist Blue State governments. And once again by the time the whole thing gets overturned it may be too late.
Look, this is heading to civil war and everyone knows it. Once people decide the government is illegitimate, and we’re already mostly there, the shooting starts. That’s why those blacks are going in rampages in Philly. The government has no legitimacy. They know it.
The Government Party needs the status quo to hold. The status quo says an indicted candidate drops out of the race.
Once the status quo is shattered – there will be no viable Republican Party after 2024 whether Trump wins or not – all bets are off.
They’re going to have to shred lawful ballots. What better symbol for a sleepy public that their government is illegitimate than that?
Let them. We no longer have to believe the lie.
If they can get her replaced and then have a moderate or conservative judge having a bench trial is probably a good idea!
A lot of J6ers went for bench trials, knowing the DC Jury pool is absolutely polluted. They found the judges in DC to be as biased as the jury pool.
There are no moderate or conservative judges in DC, that’s the point of charging him there. They know he will never ever get a fair trial
She shouldn’t have the option of leaving. She should have had the boot on her butt a long time ago.
She should leave in handcuffs. Trump can run for POTUS from prison if need be. But she cannot preside over a trial from jail!
Up next: the gag order. Bank on it.
Hopefully, the Trump folks have their act together for the appeals to SCOTUS on the grounds that the incumbent POTUS is trying to put a gag order on his rival using phony charges specifically to try and entrap Pres. Trump into committing an “actual” crime (contempt of court). They don’t have a real case, so they slap him with a gag order in hopes he violates it so they can charge him with that instead.
SCOTUS is also corrupt
Trump has an extraordinarily good record at SCOTUS, and the Biden regime has been slapped down repeatedly often by large majorities over absurdly unconstitutional stuff like this gag order.
Trump has a good chance of being heard and prevailing. There’s a reason Mueller didn’t try to force Trump to testify in the Russia hoax.
It’s still all out war against Trump in every way possible. Even intensifying now in election season.
Good luck trying to deal with these radical activists. There is no shame, humility, objectivity or conscience with any of them. It’s all about pushing an agenda.
The ethics taught in law school are a sad joke because radicals only care about achieving their objectives. Laws and ethics are just tools to manipulate for their purposes.
Each day it is becoming more and more obvious this is not a war against Donald J. Trump – this is the open announcement by the people running our government to every single citizen that we, “his kind” are also fully in their crosshairs. No doubt about it with what happened in NY yesterday and the person refusing to recuse herself.
Guaranteed that 90% of the Lackey Republican Senate voted to confirm the Jamaican Immigrant for a federal judgeship!
Nope, 100%. The vote was 95-0 and all Republicans present that day voted to confirm Chutkan.
Just like they rubber stamped Lisa Monaco, even after they knew of her involvement with Russia gate.
These judges and courts in the blue cities are as totalitarian as you can get.
So, how much bias to chuck the judge chutkan if we could chuck the chutkan judge?
President Trump has got to 🏆
Does trump have anymore options? We all see a conviction, what’s next?
Plenty. None of this is ever going to trial, there are so many constitutional questions to be answered as well as the venue, the jury pool, the judge, etc. It’s all going to work its way up the appeals
Partiality in judging is not good.
Whoever says to the wicked, “You are in the right”,
will be cursed by peoples, abhorred by nations,
but those who rebuke the wicked will have delight,
and a good blessing will come upon them.
Proverbs 24:23-25
Of course. Not surprised at all.
And The Maxim In Law
“No man can be the judge
in their own case” means
nothing to them.
Not surprised…
Right, she is totally unbiased. It would be funny if it wasn’t so sad.
Worst part about this obama installed activist posing as a judge are the documented remarks/comments she made about the innocent election fraud protestors of J6 at same time pretending to be impartial about President Trumps involvement in it which she already accused him of.
Get your pitch forks ready
She used remarks made by a couple of J6ers as proof of her “impartiality” – remember all those public defenders who made their clients decry President Trump and blame him for their actions? Yeah, she used those remarks in her motion to deny recusal. Have a read…
Everything has been pre-scripted. The D’s slamming the word insurrection into every media comment, public defenders forcing their assigned J6er to utter words not their own….
Jack Smith is going to go for the big charge sooner or later.
Jacksputin.
His name will live on in darkest infamy.
I call him “Jack Shit.”
Better yet, erased from all human record like that pharaoh about 3-4 millennia ago.
Hopefully strapped to an EC
She literally wondered aloud, in a ruling, why Trump hasn’t been put in prison yet. Only a fantasist would claim she can even approach anything near impartiality
This is a very important admission from the court which absolutely backs Regiter’s background on Emergency session. From the court…
Then-Vice President Pence, Senators, and Representatives were all forced to halt their constitutional duties and flee the House and Senate chambers for safety.” Id. at 15–16 (footnote omitted).
Retired Magistrate here: I never expected her to recuse. Now President Trump can take this all the way to the Supreme Court; there is precedent regarding a judge refusing to recuse. Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., 556 U.S. 868 (1988). Remember, the goal is to delay, delay and delay as much as possible.
Was wondering about that. Thanks for clearing it up in my mind, your honor!
This just might be a good thing down the line for a lot of reasons.
Trump will still dominate even if he can’t campaign at all . Nobody in their right mind is going to vote for the continued invasion on our borders , sky high prices , never ending wars and transvestites and porn in preschool libraries and class rooms .
If fraud was controlled democrats would be completely wiped out.
we depend on your legal knowledge. thank you, always.
Everyone wondering what can be done working within the system. There is no system for you and me anymore. All gone. Pitchforks and fire is what it must come to.
The deep state owns most of the judiciary. Will be hard to remove it from their control.
At this point in the game, I don’t know what to expect.
This is very alarming indeed. Blatantly wrong and unethical.
Chutkan is a Judge Sullivan in a skirt.
Worse.
She is a Red Diaper Baby of recent Jamaican extraction.
Akin to Kommie Harris, only more competently corrupt.
Just another justification for appeal
Its not going to stop until the 75+ million Trump voters who have been continually defrauded of the their votes show up in DC , NY.and any other place where these frauds reside and work. No one could stop them, but will they have the guts to show up.
Trumps REAL vote totals are more than double the 75+ million .
Expected yes.
May take some time, but it will fail.
While avoiding admitting bias for the time being, once ‘overturned,’ the exposure and consequences will be more severe.
Patience, ‘grasshoppers!’
The Lawfare crew is trapped. They have to keep attacking because they don’t know what else to do. They have never faced an opponent of Trump’s caliber. They never thought, okay, if we fail, then what? They have no answer to that question.
And the more they attack, the stronger he gets.
If we had a legitimate DOJ, Chutkan would be under investigation if not already facing serious criminal charges.
The problem, as you well know, is that we don’t have a legitimate DOJ. Otherwise this Charlie Foxtrot would not have been allowed in the first place.
Her previous recusal says it all. If she could not fairly judge Hillary, how can she fairly judge Trump? The grounds are clear, but her previous recusal is NEVER mentioned in the corporate legacy media. It galls a fair mind.
Jezebel
Trump’s Presidential Immunity Defense-
For Trump’s lawyers, the trick will be to paint the actions underpinning the various indictments as falling within the “outer perimeter” of legitimate presidential power, and then arguing that the threat of a criminal indictment stemming from that conduct would cause more than a “mere distraction” from the duties of the office. This is the question for the Supreme Court.
Going forward, the legal analysis will likely boil down to two questions. The first is whether, by asking DOJ officials to declare the 2020 election “corrupt,” for example, Trump was acting within the “outer boundaries” of executive policy-making authority. If so, certain acts could conceivably be immune from prosecution or otherwise excised from the scope of the criminal indictments.
The second question is whether greenlighting criminal indictments that implicate even borderline conduct would set a bad precedent that could hamper future presidents from performing their constitutional duties. Even if what Trump did as president was unacceptable, in other words, if it fell within the discretion that presidents need in order to do their jobs, it could be protected.
President Nixon said that “if the President does it, it’s not illegal” and the Supreme Court (in the
case Nixon v. Fitzgerald)
essentially agreed with him.
“A president and those who assist him must be free to explore alternatives in the process of shaping policies and making decisions, and to do so in a way many would be unwilling to express except privately.” Balancing the public’s interests in justice with the interests of the presidency has been the prevailing standard ever since.
Federal courts have repeatedly held that Presidents and former Presidents have immunity from prosecution of civil lawsuits for official actions even if those actions were on the outer perimeter of the President’s official duties. The question of criminal immunity has never happened before however the Constitution provides impeachment as the only recourse for Presidential misconduct.
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/08/22/trump-immunity-supreme-court-00112124
Supreme Court…
In its 1867 decision Mississippi v. Johnson, the Supreme Court established that the President is largely beyond the reach of the judiciary by holding that it could not direct President Andrew Johnson in how he exercised his purely executive and political powers.1
The Court stated, it had no jurisdiction . . . to enjoin the President in the performance of his official duties.
A Federal Court has no jurisdiction (2nd guess) to question the actions of a President!
She is not bias; she has to follow the script given her, in order to collect a reward. like a Scooby treat.
Her vanity blinds her from seeing her bias or she is just a spiteful woman who thinks she will be written about with fondness in future history books. Maybe she will but there is a chance that she may not. It will be her choice as to whether or not she wants to be remembered as a fair and impartial judge or not.
I think this is what motivates a lot of what we are seeing in the get Trump justice system right now. AG’s, judges and juries, are most likely thinking they are a part of history in the making. They are cheering as they fundamentally transforming the country.
I’m aware that the Scotus can’t do anything about a case until it is brought before them but I think that it would be unrealistic to think that all this underhanded politicizing of these cases that have been brought against Trump and the obvious bias by not only the DOJ but the judiciary is not being watched very closely by the Scotus because they KNOW that at some point that all or part of it is going to end up on their docket.
Whether it gets there while it makes any difference is going to be up to the skill of Trumps attorneys.
After the the biased unconstitutional crap that’s been pulled and the doxxing of some members of Scotus, some of them may be itching to slap someone. I hope so.
Judicial corruption is the most disheartening. Always remember. Packing the courts of the D.C. Circuit, both district and court of appeals, was the entire point of Harry Reid jettisoning the filibuster for lower federal court nominees. Had President Trump not prevailed in 2016 and not nominated three United States Supreme Court justices, we would be looking at the federal courts rubberstamping every policy position of the UniParty/Deep State. We would be exactly where Israel finds itself right now. An imperial federal judiciary interpreting the law to favor the mostly leftwing political class.
D.C. court system was created by legislation in Congress. Congress can repeal that legislation, and there is nothing any of those tyrants in black robes can do about it.
Uh huh!
Mayo Clinic Nukes Hydroxychloroquine Information Page After People Take Notice | ZeroHedge
All these demon possessed cretins continue to play right into Trump and the MAGA Patriots’ hands. Well DONE!
Her refusal to recuse actually will give Trump an issue to appeal. He’ll get nowhere with the DC circuit since they’re all judges like Chutkan. But it can be appealed to SCOTUS. There will several other issues ripe for appeals also. The case is ridiculous. But they will convict in the short run and get their photo op and possibly impede his ability to campaign. Which of course is the whole objective of the fascist Democrats. When reversed by SCOTUS it will likely be after the November 2024 election. It’s sickening.
Time for SCOTUS to get off their asses, uphold their oaths, and shake up the corrupt judicial mess in this country.
How much $$$ she get from deep state coups,
Impeach ’em. If the R’s had any cajones there’d be full time impeachments of judges going on instead of the theater of oversight committees that do NOTHING
Expecting liberals to “do the right thing” is like asking Mitt Romney to do the right thing.
Can Trump appeal?
This is what the Lord says to unjust judges. Everyone forgets the fact that President Trump and his family employ thousands of people around the globe. Some widows, some orphans, and all who support their families. All of those people will be unemployed after these unhinged, leftist judges make their evil decrees:
Isaiah 10:
Woe to unjust judges and to those who issue unfair laws, says the Lord, 2 so that there is no justice for the poor, the widows, and orphans. Yes, it is true that they even rob the widows and fatherless children.
3 Oh, what will you do when I visit you in that day when I send desolation upon you from a distant land? To whom will you turn then for your help? Where will your treasures be safe? 4 I will not help you; you will stumble along as prisoners or lie among the slain. And even then my anger will not be satisfied, but my fist will still be poised to strike you.”
God is in control! He works in His time, not ours!
May she fall in front of a steamroller
I don’t care. These people need to meet their maker
This is what happens when you allow 3rd world people to occupy 1st world positions.
… you know the old expression: … judge, jury and executioner…
agreed…….. look no further than Justice Arthur Engoron of New York state for a perfect example and I expect this DC ” judge ” to be no different.
Really got to thank them for going down this route though. If they wanted to show that the judge ruled in bias for appeals, bang up job.
3-6mo from now they’re really going to hope that Biden wins.