UPDATED – To add court transcript for context.
First things first, it’s Politico! When the Dept of Justice or FBI need to frame a narrative particular to their interests they use Politico and the New York Times. Keep this in mind. When Main Justice needs to position themselves, they leak to NYT and Politico. All leaks are purposeful.
Politico has received a copy of what is claimed to be the original Hunter Biden plea agreement between the USAO in Delaware and the Biden defense team. This is the plea agreement that was challenged by U.S. District Court Judge Maryellen Noreika, who was concerned the structure of the deal appeared to be creating immunity from prosecution for crimes that might come out of a now admitted, ongoing investigation of Hunter Biden; those crimes may include FARA violations.
[Politico Article Here]
[Plea Agreement and Attachment #1 Here]
[Diversion Agreement and Attachment “A” HERE]
The core issue centers around what appears to be clear coordination between the USAO, likely with the approvals of Main Justice (Monaco, Garland) and the Biden defense team, to structure the wording and placement of legal mechanisms inside the plea agreement to not only excuse the current criminal infractions, but also protect Hunter Biden from future criminal liability.
Essentially, all previous activities by Hunter Biden would be immune from prosecution, up to the date of his signing of the plea agreement. A blank slate retroactively, with all exposure for criminal conduct removed. The conduct surrounding the immunity is outlined in “Exhibit 1” and the “Attachment A” which was filed under seal.
“Attachment A” as above, was filed under seal. Apparently, leaked to Politico – despite not being part of the public court record. It is obvious to those who deal in such matters, the attachment was likely written by the Biden defense team and not the US Attorney Office in Delaware.
“Exhibit 1”, assembled with the statement of fact, is highlighted below and represents the second set of standards to frame the legal immunity from prosecution. Despite an ongoing investigation, anything that would fall into the parameters of Attachment-A and/or Exhibit-1 would be part of what the DOJ is saying would not be criminally prosecuted.
Biden would be excused from “any federal crimes” that touch on these issues and result from the ongoing investigation. This is what the judge ‘reportedly‘ took exception to.
While the gun crime and the tax violations are the face of the legal immunity (the admission of guilt and plea), avoiding criminal liability for the underlying activity that created the income is the issue that appears to be structured by the plea as an ancillary, albeit purposeful, protection.
UPDATE: The transcript of the court hearing shows the context of the dynamic at play. [TRANSCRIPT LINK] U.S. District Court Judge Maryellen Noreika is questioning USAO David Wise about the nature of this plea agreement, and the construct of how the agreement not to prosecute is buried in paragraph 15 of the diversion agreement.
It will be interesting to see how this goes.
This is a critical moment for the DOJ, particularly Deputy AG Lisa Monaco and Attorney General Merrick Garland, as the transparency of the “dual justice system” is represented within the collusion between the USAO in Delaware and the representatives of the Biden family.
There is an obvious intent by Main Justice to protect the Biden family, a political motive, as well as maintain protection of the corrupt DOJ institution itself behind the shield of an “ongoing investigation.” Questions cannot be answered because an investigation is “ongoing,” you know the game.
“Your Honor, I believe that this is a bilateral agrement between the parties that the parties view in their best interest.” Oh I just bet that they do. lol
Remember who the parties are here: (1) “Main Justice” – which is controlled by the regime, who’s leader is himself alleged to be liable for the underlying criminality alluded to in the supposedly ongoing investigations; (2) Hunter Biden, son of the potentially liable leader of the regime, with whom he allegedly worked hand-in-glove in the perpetration of this criminality. You’d best believe that these two sides agree that immunity from THAT liability is in their best interests.
In authoritarian regimes where optics isn’t as great a concern, the investigators would have been shot by this point, and the judge ‘disappeared’. Instead, in this country, where we still have a token, if tenacious, opposition, we have the two sides of an alleged criminal enterprise agreeing that it’s in their mutual best interest not to prosecute. And all this, in a country founded as a Constitutional Republic. This goes far beyond side-show questions of woke-ness or virtue signalling. But thankfully, as we approach the Rubicon, more and more voices dare to cross over and call it what it is – treason.
Yeah…let’s sweep all this little spat under the Mount Everest rug of treason. Oops, the broom broke!
Didn’t the Kennedy family have scandal after scandal swept under the rug
It’s interesting to know the frustration of Americans at that time, although they were in part complicit because Americans loved the Kennedys. Bill Clinton too was a charmer.
I feel like Hilary changed everything. She thought she would be treated equally, but guess what honey, no one likes you.
Since her shenanigans, Americans are learning it’s ok to see, hear and speak of evil again in a way that hasn’t happened since the revolution.
“…although they (Amerians) were in part complicit because Americans loved the Kennedys.”
I was an adult in the time of the Kennedys.
This American was not complicit in the way you describe. This American did not blindly “love the Kennedys”.
I was a 12 year old child at the time of the assassination. I assure you the Florida panhandle did not love the Kennedys
I can assure you the people of Palm Beach did not love the Kennedys.
Still have a tee shirt with all of the watering holes Uncle Ted and Willie hit the night of Willie’s adventure with a local.
I was in my early 20s, attending school in Los Angeles.
Nor did Kansas, where I was in high school. Lots of skulduggery that did not escape notice.
Kennedy’s were before my time so maybe I’m off base. But aren’t you kind of falling into the trap of “oh it’s just about sex and drugs?”
What’s really at risk here is they wouldn’t be able to prosecute him (or joe) for all the influence peddling if the judge agreed to these terms.
I’ve never heard the Kennedys were guilty of taking bribes from foreign countries to alter foreign policy. But maybe I’ve just heard the Camelot version.
Start wity Rep. Ted “Splash” Kennedy’s Immigration Reform Bill that was passed by the Dems in ’65,… it set the table for the unknown millions of illegal alien trespassers now encumbering USA taxpayers. Camelot my derriere.
Was his support purchased with Bribes, campaign contributions or did he believe in the bill as part if his party’s platform?
The Hero of Chappaquiddick was the Senate point man for that bill, he was not the writer of said legislation. The official name of the bill was the Hart – Cellar Act.
Why get in the weeds of the minutia of the crime they committed, which is TREASON, and then focus on the “everyday normal”* crime while sweeping the one punishment for HIGH CRIMES under the rug.
I do not care what crimes they keep committing they committed the treason, because past the point they committed treason as there is only one punishment they face for what they ALREADY did.
Who cares if he’s still taking bribes and committing treason when they have not even punished him for the first or second or other previous High Crimes (TREASON).
Remember that Section 2 is the Supremacy Clause
[2] This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
Article III, Section 3, Clause 1:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court
Breaking their sworn Oath/Affirmation of Office to the Constitution (to uphold and protect) is treason. That they aid and abet the aliens and foreign powers that run free and empowered in these United States with the FULL government participation … is treason.
JFK won the popular vote by less than 113,000. The media may have loved the Kennedy’s, but i remember an awful lot of folks that didn’t.
Who loved JFK? The Roman Catholic population (of all ethnicities), of which there were many more of them then there is now, plus the Irish. Surely, the “WASP”s had a lot of disdain for him. Just MHO.
Many blacks loved JFK. Even as late as the mid ’80s, many had his framed portrait hanging in their living rooms.
That’s a fact. Right along with a portrait of JFK.
As I recall, the Kennedy scandals were personal in nature, and at times with serious criminal potential. I do not recall much in the way of public corruption. Maybe someone recalls differently.
Rejected plea deal leaves Hunter Biden’s team fuming
https://www.axios.com/2023/07/27/rejected-plea-deal-leaves-hunter-biden-team-fuming
They must be totally frantic at this point. Their response will be to indict DJT of shiny and new “crimes.”
Meanwhile, Loser McCarthy will not bring up impeachment regarding any and all of these Deep Statists who are continually undermining our Country as we know it. McCarthy has to go. He is not up to the job.
Am getting sick and dam tired of hearing “Impeachment??? Oh, but… but ….but the Republicans are better than that.”
Her statement “so is this even constitutional ?“
says it all.
In answer to her clearly rhetorical question / remark, and Paraphrasing the words of another great legal philosopher : “ It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘ even’ is oddly enough …” (s//)
Anyone need more proof of a two tier justice system?
See my comment above.
Wise should have just said, “Look your Honor, you and I both know there’s no precedent, this is completely unconstitutional, and the only reason we’re here is to protect the ‘smartest’ man Joe Biden knows. And I’m not referring to Hunter, your Honor.(wink wink)”
It’s surprising that this wasn’t rubber stamped. I wonder why the doj didn’t get a favorable judge. It seems like they never have a problem getting the judge they want.
I wondered that too..They didn;t judge shop this one. Unless they figured she would
go along.. Maybe she would have till they pulled thier shenanigans the other night
with the phone call pretending to be someone to get some brief pulled. Maybe with
that she realized they were up to something which made her really read the entire
plea deal which raised questions.
Great point, Jenevive.
I believe this was a Trump appointee. So good question.
But she is a Dem. She was put forward by the Dem senators from Delaware. Same with Weiss.
Maybe she wasn’t amused by the antics of the defense lawyers calling her clerk and pretending to be a lawyer for the Oversight Committee and then convincing the clerk to remove the whistleblower testimony submitted as an amicus brief.
There also seems to be “a giant security hole” in that someone could phone a clerk, say that they are someone else, and briefly at least get away with what they attempted to do. They came much too close.
The judge seems concerned about her own legal hazard here.
That too…
Left off “also” there! There are a few alarm bells going off in that court…
As well she should be…that and her soul
I think it’s all part of the plan to get rid of Biden, not in a prosecutorial manner but a political one. Because, let’s be honest, he won’t be charged with any crimes, at least, not until PDJT is POTUS again, and we have a genuine AG.
Those seem to be hard to find.
They’re sacrificing Biden so they can get trump on the same crimes.
PDJT hasn’t been taking bribes from every foreign country out there. Or laundering money through a drug addled offspring.
It appears that there ae 4 judges in the U.S. istrict Court for Delaware. Assignments of a given case to a judge are made by a random process. I’ve wondered if the random process is suceptible to tinkering.
We – the citizens of this country – were lucky.
“Gee, clerk, how many other cases have to be filed before Judge X gets the next case?” Then you wait to see who goes in and files…timing
So no one is above the law unless you are a Democrat.
A bilateral agreement between the parties ….that the parties view in their best interest. What mush. If this was any JAG or even TrumpJR….what woud the best interest be viewed as?
Lock him up.
Fear not: any plea agreement will not forbid Hunter from creating his art.
I heard frustrated artists are the best artists. Or was that starving? No matter.
Odd that you mention that. I’ve heard that the “value” of the art goes way up when the artist dies.
Not Hunter’s art. Once access is removed the value of the “art” is null.
His slop.
One of those people who bought his “art” for a high price is a Dem Donor and went to the WH several times and was rewarded with a Biden appointment
Democratic donor who bought Hunter Biden’s art visited White House a dozen times
A Democratic donor who purchased a piece of artwork by first son Hunter Biden — and was later appointed to a prestigious commission — visited the White House 13 times in the past year and a half, visitor logs show.
Elizabeth Hirsh Naftali attended several crowded events with President Biden between September 2022 and March 2023 — and also enjoyed a one-on-one meeting with White House senior adviser Neera Tanden, the Washington Free Beacon first reported.
https://nypost.com/2023/07/25/donor-who-bought-hunter-bidens-art-visited-white-house-a-dozen-times/
Ok, I’m interested in your opinion as to whether the fix is in or not, given that this judge uncovered the collusion that gave the perverted Biden scion the sweetheart deal?
Are we possibly, just possibly, about to see an establishment figure finally get seriously prosecuted?
Give us your best guess, please!
No. If “the walls start closing in”, Joe will suddenly resign due to mental deterioration and absolutely no one would prosecute a former president with Alzheimers. If necessary, dispensable Kamala would sign a full pardon under the justification of mental incapacity.
Agreed that’s likely for “The Big Guy” but I’m wondering if Hunter is going to get hung?
Then Kamala will also pardon Hunter. No biggie, just DS swamp tactics, as usual.
Even if there was a claim of mental incapacitation that made prosecution I’ll-advised, that does not mean that the crimes were not committed, and committed over a period of time during which the subject was mentally competent.
I’m going to be optimistic and say that yes, there will be some justice done. It may not be what we want, but I think that since Joe’s on his way out anyway, TPTB will let Hunter take the fall, however short that’ll be.
Yes, but for the unity of the country, to heal the wounds, a full pardon cures all ills.
Dan Bongino did a good long podcast today with synthesis. It eventually leads to the FARA violations which will drag in Hillary and Obama. He has some speculation that Rotting Oatmeal Brain will pardon the Crackhead son and step down to exclude the possibility of a trial that drags Him and The One and The Hag on stage.
It’s on Rumble now.
He usually does the same thing on the radio spot that I receive at 10:00pm down here.
Problem is we all know oatmeal brain is only Resident!!!!!
After reading the documents the only appropriate comment is, “… what is a disgusting slug trail of human endeavor.” And our government, funded by our collectively earned incomes, is purposed to shield scum like this. Jesus…
Please do not use the Lord’s name in vain. We need Him now more than ever.
Thank you.
“Very well said.” But aren’t you being a little hard on slugs?
BTW, whatever happened to the judge threatening to sanction Hunter’s lawyers for their dirty Court Clerk trick one day before the hearing?
Crickets.
Yeah, I was wondering the same thing. As more evidence comes out & is “revealed”, there is a long list of crimes both Hunter & Joe could have been/be charged with.
I have an observation and a further question. My wife commented this morning that Hillary seems unusually quiet lately? She was Sec State when Biden was VP, right? Is it possible that Hillary is joined at the hip with the Biden crime family and was complicit in all these foreign shenanigans that enriched the Bidens?
Just thinkin’ …
The unspoken (I won’t tell anyone if you don’t) pledge which binds all of DC.
Enriched the Bidens and the Clintons. Pretty sure she was taking money for policy but was smart enough to not put a crack addicted person as her bagman.
It’s reported that State warned Preezy Obama about the Biden’s biz doings in Ukraine in 2015.
Probably is the reason the Clinton Foundation is still afloat. She’s certainly always been a fan of “never let a good crisis go to waste”….
Where are the worthless sacks of crap, aka State Attorneys General?
God I hate republicans.
This is an interesting take on the matter:
“Typically, if the Government is offering to a defendant that it will either drop charges or decline to bring new charges in return for the defendant’s guilty plea, the plea is structured under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(A). An agreement not to prosecute Hunter for FARA violations or other crimes in return for his pleading guilty to the tax misdemeanors, for example, would usually be a (c)(1)(A) plea. This is open, transparent, subject to judicial approval, etc.
In Hunter’s case, according to what folks in the courtroom have told me, Hunter’s plea was structured under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(B), which is usually just a plea in return for a joint sentencing recommendation only, and contained no information on its face about other potential charges, and contained no clear agreement by DOJ to forego prosecution of other charges.
Instead, DOJ and Hunter’s lawyers effectively hid that part of the agreement in what was publicly described as a pretrial diversion agreement relating to a § 922(g)(3) gun charge against Hunter for being a drug user in possession of a firearm.
That pretrial diversion agreement as written was actually MUCH broader than just the gun charge. If Hunter were to complete probation, the pretrial diversion agreement prevented DOJ from ever bringing charges against Hunter for any crimes relating to the offense conduct discussed in the plea agreement, which was purposely written to include his foreign influence peddling operations in China and elsewhere.
So they put the facts in the plea agreement, but put their non-prosecution agreement in the pretrial diversion agreement, effectively hiding the full scope of what DOJ was offering and Hunter was obtaining through these proceedings. Hunter’s upside from this deal was vast immunity from further prosecution if he finished a couple years of probation, and the public wouldn’t be any the wiser because none of this was clearly stated on the face of the plea agreement, as would normally be the case.
Judge Noreika smelled a rat. She understood that the lawyers were trying to paint her into a corner and hide the ball. Instead, she backed DOJ and Hunter’s lawyers into a corner by pulling all the details out into the open and then indicating that she wasn’t going to approve a deal as broad as what she had discovered.
DOJ, attempting to save face and save its case, then stated on the record that the investigation into Hunter was ongoing and that Hunter remained susceptible to prosecution under FARA. Hunter’s lawyers exploded. They clearly believed that FARA was covered under the deal, because as written, the pretrial diversion agreement language was broad enough to cover it. They blew up the deal, Hunter pled not guilty, and that’s the current state of play.
And so here we are. Hunter’s lawyers and DOJ are going to go off and try to pull together a new set of agreements, likely narrower, to satisfy Judge Noreika. Fortunately, I doubt if FARA or any charges related to Hunter’s foreign influence peddling will be included, which leaves open the possibility of further investigations leading to further prosecutions.” …….
This deal was cut before the Whisleblowers and now the heat is on. They were trying to beat the FARA-game because that opens up questioning dangerous to Daddy War-Bucks.
As Sundance noted, the real issue is not the taxes. THERE IS NO PROPER AMOUNT OF TAXES TO PAY ON BRIBES. AND THAT’S THE FAMILY BUSINESS.
ps; It’s not millions, either. It’s BILLION$.
See that’s where the US jobs went, any countries that greased the pedo got their money’s worth.
It’s all about getting everything on the record in one bundle so Joe can pardon the scum bag in total…no loose ends, no threats to Joe….case closed!
Do to the incessant hounding by super ultra white MAGA transphobics of my good little boy who who who dindu nuffin and butter wouldn’t melt in his mouth I hereby pardon him for all time for every thing. It’s all trumps fault ! 🙁
God save the Queen of Iran.
Do to my health I hereby resign as POTUS.
(stop it jill quit hitting me barock says I gotta doit)
“my good little boy who dindu nuffin”
just for good measure:
Spot on, Mycroft – lol!
this is the plus side of blackmail
once it gets so overused (via NSA database google search engine’ing your enemies) then it clogs the entire wheel.
2 people blackmailing each other is a stale mate. but the people are forced to see how unnatural the prosecution is.. etc..
they expose themselves to Democrats. once democrats scream UNIPARTY – the frontline army you want is there.
brilliant comment.
The judge is a fast reader and has excellent comprehension skills
“just before the hearing”
They are so incredibly sleezy. Paragraph 15 is the cherry on top and they didn’t provide it until time of hearing. The judge had to be furious at some level. Her questioning cited by SD above was great.
I wonder how all the black folks feel about this?
Normally ,when these leaks occur, they are advantageous to the leaker. Doesn’t this leak shine more light on how the laws were bent and ignored to favor HB. ? And won’t this leak annoy this judge even more?
Pray and help others
Not just black folks. Anyone put through this wringer and not well heeled or well connected or both, would never be given this kind of a deal.
Is Weiss the same as Wise?
Yes. Transcriber writes what she/he hears and Weiss would sound like Wise.
To be fair, maybe Hunter thought all the taxes should be paid by Pedo Joe from his half of the criminally gotten gains?
good one, Wattie
And the media is saying the judge dismissed the plea deal because it was “too vague”! She dismissed it because it strained credulity!
Who believes the MSM?
How much longer is this going to be allowed to go by We The People?
As long as We The People allow it to.
WTH?
There is no delineation of any crimes that “won’t be prosecuted.”
This is a blank check plea.
If the judge would have signed this, and it was found that the demon committed murder, he would not be prosecuted. Oh, Dear Lord
My God, why have you abandoned us?
Never.
“…he has said, “I will never leave you nor forsake you.” So we can confidently say,
“The Lord is my helper;
I will not fear;
what can man do to me?”–Hebrews 13:5-6
The enemies you see today you will soon see no more. GOD’s Word, Hallelujah!
God has not abandoned us.
We are in a Job moment.
We Gather Together
To Ask The Lord’s Blessing;
He Chastens And Hastens
His Will To Make Known;
Things will get better when more of us wise up.
🤣 🤣 🤣
Justice denied doesn’t just go away.
This article goes into the more extensively reported shenanigans about an amicus brief – and the fraudulent attempt by H Biden’s lawyers to get it scrubbed and which in normal times would get them both disbarred and jailed – but also a smaller event that happened just before the Hearing. So there is more going on than that revealed by the official transcript.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/07/courtroom-perspective-gop-hero-julianne-murray-weighs-hunter/
Apparently, the laws are for me and thee, not them. FUBAR and FJB
It nothing but smoke and mirrors?
I still need to know what her motive was. Did she realize she was being set up by the corrupt DOJ as the fall guy, and reject it. Are there others like her in the corrupt system that are being dragged along against their will? Did the IRS hearings clue her in? Because the answers to those questions might lay the groundwork for how to deconstruct — piece-by-piece — the Deep State.
I have only one question for Sundance.
how is it that this website never seems to have detractors from the DS? You have many important (and I believe True) things to say. Yet, no trolls on this website? It’s very weird.
There are plenty of detractors, trolls, what-have-you and Sundance , along with his A-Team, do a great job monitoring all of it and taking care of business, one troll at a time!
LOL!
Stay Frosty!
The commenting system is proprietary, designed to avoid the noise and provide the discussion community the ability to enhance and engage in conversation.
The Treehouse is a community. The conversation is the point!
Hope that helps.
My Dad’s employees over at DOJ and I, his son, agree to this peachy keen settlement.
Just sign here, ma’am. All is good.
The judge is a very smart cookie.
Any Judge could have seen what was being done with that plea agreement. This one actually decided she couldn’t tolerate the Big Government monkeys pulling a fast one on her. Brains can make this kind of stuff up. This judge had good moral values and stood for them.
I pray that this judge wakes up and don’t let anything through. She has to scrutinize everything.
Maybe the lawyers and doj confused diversion with dispersion. It’s easy to do when dealing with the Biden clan.
What a bunch of malarkey! We all know this is just swamp theater. The Resident will issue a Residential pardon and the culprit will go free. Of course I could be wrong if this strings out until Daddy is no longer in power and able to cover junior’s six.
Best case is this explodes and brings the whole clan down sooner rather than later. But I’m not holding my breath.
The current Resident is not the real Joe Biden. That may complicate matters related to pardoning someone. Only the President, in this case Joe Biden, may pardon someone.
Eve the UK Daily Mail has picked up on this story:
EXCLUSIVE: Hunter Biden’s full plea deal TRANSCRIPT – and how his sneaky lawyers and prosecution team tried to hide clause giving him ‘blanket immunity’ in ‘crazy, unprecedented’ tactic until Judge Maryellen Noreika ‘smelled a rat’
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/us-exclusive/article-12345263/Hunter-Bidens-plea-deal-TRANSCRIPT-sneaky-lawyers-prosecution-team-tried-hide-clause-giving-blanket-immunity-crazy-unprecedented-tactic-Judge-Maryellen-Noreika-smelled-rat.html
Please pray for Judge Noreika’s safety
Sure hope the Judge does not have any pets.
Ive been hard no Fox News. But, this is worth it. Comer says there are off shore accounts.
So did anybody else think that this judge talked, A LOT! She was a gross explainer. People are falling for her, but I think most judges could have handled this in 20 minutes, she took over 3 hours. I’ve noticed that in our high courts Justices and Judges that you know will never rule against the party, love to ask provocative, teasing questions. Questions that lead people to think they are considering voting against the Party. But they never do.
Sometimes the cat loves to play with the mouse before the big chomp.
AND! It was weird how the USA and the defense were both trying to figure out a resolution best for Hunter.
Each time a judge validates these corrupt proceedings it brings the country closer to a dictatorship.
So many questionable things jump out at me: the timeline of Hunter’s drug use, the death of his first accountant, why would anyone pay over a million bucks of someone else’s tax liability – isn’t the judge interested in that or maybe it’s not her purview, but that guy is getting something or the Biden’s have threatened him. And the gun was found and then deposited in a trash bin – found by whom? left in a public place by whom? Weren’t the secret service called in on this even though Hunter was not under protection at the time? That would be misuse of government resources, but the document just says law enforcement.
Sundance, you need to bring out suspicious cat. I don’t for a second believe that Hunter Biden’s lawyers are this stupid.
This might be a deke to get an almost equally odious plea deal to be accepted by the public. (Overton window)
Years of reading you have left me suspicious about everything.
About that gun disposed of in a trash can outside of a supermarket across the street from a high school.
Remember when the Secret Service (or was it?) tried to get the gun seller to hand over the sale paperwork to the permanently?
Sources: Secret Service inserted itself into case of Hunter Biden’s gun
By Tara Palmeri and Ben Schreckinger
25 Mar 2021
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/03/25/sources-secret-service-inserted-itself-into-case-of-hunter-bidens-gun-477879
I think this should be in the file for the judge to look at as well.
The same SS that
crackedcouldn’t crack the cocaine case at the White House.How many Where’s Hunter piss and hair tests are attached to the judges paperwork? Since the cocaine case? 3+ weeks should equal at least 3.
Attorney here. This comment is not going to be popular, but it needs to be said. Any competent attorney would do the same thing for his/her client, and it’s the right thing to do. Hunter Biden is under investigation for a slew of federal crimes, all of which he is almost certainly guilty of committing, and all of which are part of the same nucleus of operative facts. The government needs to buck up and prosecute all the charges or drop them. Even Hunter Biden, disgusting piece of filth that he is, deserves protection against double jeopardy.
This is not the hill for us to die on, or even to put up much of a fight. Yes, there’s a double standard in our “justice” system, and we need to continue to bring attention to that, but Hunter Biden will receive a full presidential pardon in due course so none of this really matters. I wonder whether this little diversion was planned as a mechanism to give Hunter another year or two so to fight the charges before Joe gives him a pardon on his way out of the White House or after reelection.
I have not followed the saga closely enough to know all the facts, but I would assume that some of Hunter Biden’s criminal conduct must have been committed in red states. The attorneys general and/or district attorneys in those states should be following this case closely and preparing to charge Hunter Biden in their respective states on state charges. Double jeopardy does not apply to state charges.
And btw, the US attorney’s name is David Weiss, not Wise. I believe the attorney handling the case is named Leo Wise. I would assume that Leo Wise is the attorney designated in the transcript.
I think most Treepers respect the advocacy of a strong attorney in our adversarial system. This is t about that.
This is about the DOJ burying the cases and crimes so as not to implicate the felon who sits in the presidential chair unlawfully, as the result of a fraudulent, stolen 2020 election, wherein President Trump’s voters were disenfranchised.
One cannot cherry-pick one aspect of the malfeasance of our government- it is all of a piece.