“The O’Keefe Media Group broke its first story investigating what appears to be a national plot to utilize senior citizens matching a similar profile as vehicles to launder millions of dollars into political campaigns.” [link]
James O’Keefe uses publicly available FEC data to locate donors who are reported to have given thousands of donations to Act Blue. However, the people listed on the FEC reports have no idea why there is a massive difference between the number, frequency and scale of their contributions, compared to their actual donations. The differences are massive. WATCH:
.
One of the possible explanations is that people inside ACT BLUE use previous organic donor activity to fraudulently launder donations that come from larger networks. By breaking up large donations into smaller amounts, it gives the appearance of a larger support base (small donors) and washes the fingerprints away from the identity of the originating large donor, individual, group or institution.
“ O M G “ !!!!!!
-Perfect
Kickbacks of Foreign Aid money? Where does all that money go anyway?
Slava Ukraini!
Into the campaigns of the likes of Rafael Wornock, who was the top recipient of them, from as far away as Washington State. Common sense itself tells you that numerous people from Washington State could care less for a campaign by a Senator from Georgia. But yet no Law Enforcement, no FBI, nobody in the DOJ even remotely appears to want to investigate any of this. YET, we’re no supposed to believe in Stolen Elections, RIGHT?
If Warnock got big $$$$, you can damn well guess Stacey Abrams wasn’t far
behind. The woman is an absolute master at fraud.
All money being fungible. All data bases being accessible. Imagine the possibilities.
Two stories worth considering: BLM has used Act Blue as a fundraising conduit.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/new-analysis-corporate-america-has-donated-82-billion-to-blm-related-causes-so-far
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/actblue-still-allowing-blm-to-solicit-donations-despite-charitys-shutdown-claim
Another tool of election rigging likely compatible with linking data bases:
Recently discovered by TGP and David Clements a buffer software used by many states can manipulate voter rolls, tracks the election count in real time, can overwrite an entire election if need be during a phony power outage, then sends the results to the SOS illegally who then sends the results to the counties—top down rather than the counties sending their results to the SOS bottom up.
It’s all a result of the Empire of Lies. WE, the proletariat, have been propagandized by media at the direction of our government. We know this, they know we know this, we know they know, yet still they persist in lying. It’s what this out-of-control central government does best….lie…cheat….and steal….and of course, overturn sovereign countries…with all the death and destruction that entails.
Sadly, at 70+ years of age; I’ve come to realize that this country may not have ever been the bright shining beacon of liberty we were once taught, except for a brief moment in history.
Our country will slowly (or suddenly) fail and may only be remembered for the atrocities the U.S. committed internationally. The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution will be relegated to mouldy tombs where they will slowly fade from memory.
Alas, Babylon!
Yes, I saw that
Great work. Ypu know they want him dead.
Dnc, where else would it go. Plus jobama’s 10%
Antifa and BLM donations.
Maybe if one of these individuals tried writing off these donations on their income taxes it would finally get someone’s attention. Although it appears they all are Democrats.
They don’t even know they “donated” most or all of what the FEC was told.
They may have donated in the past, but once they have the name, the computers take over and ‘donate’ the kleptocratic currency on their behalf.
Looking through the data that looks to be a scam.
Everyone that has donated should look through the list. There must be a way to get your name out of this system if you see donations assigned to you that you didn’t make.
Sure is. Don’t vote Democrat.
Funny! But that would not work for donor names already in the criminal hands of ActBlue who are acting to subvert elections daily.
Congress’ investigative list is beginning to look like the length of War and Peace and Atlas Shrugged put together….
Great idea! I need to look up my address and see if there’s any funny business. Maybe I’ll finally get a return!
Now there’s a thought. Except, if the IRS audits you they will want you to provide receipts of the donations. Since you didn’t make the donation, you don’t have the receipts and will be charged with creating on your taxes.
The other thing is that political donations are not tax deductible.
Exactly.
The Swiss allow political donations as cash but do not allow donations such as clothes, furniture or household items to be deducted.
Or a knock on your front door.
Ah but some “charities” might provide cash to political parties via such laundering.
So that’s the constant begging for $5 contributions in the ads; they just need more addresses to enable this activity and dilute the reports. Wow.
I think you’re on to something.
Nothing says grass roots like a big data algo faking loads of small donors into pristine astroturf.
Yup! Basically all that money that’s been sent to Ukraine, gets laundered, sent back to the U.S through sites like ActBlue where it is then divided up and made to look like thousands of individual “donations” for the Democratic Party.
But here is where they got caught…when it shows up as though one person made several hundred to over a thousand separate $1, $2 or $5 donations, things start to smell fishy. Especially when the donation amounts are totaling upwards of tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars, yet the person who supposedly “donated” is currently unemployed! OOPS… they’ve all been caught red handed!!!
I remember that Obama was accepting millions in illegal donations from foreigners via websites. I wonder if a little electronic coding deftly launders that foreign money now.
And……there was NO curiosity around it. Just like there was no curiosity around “tell Vlad I can do more after the election” or the SS numbers or the hs Ouse he bought from the felon.
And ActBlue was helping “Born in Kenya” Obama in his illegal efforts to raise campaign money.
https://www.unz.com/mmalkin/obamas-crooked-campaign-cash-o-matic-machine-revisited/
All the president’s funny money
by Michelle Malkin
Ka-ching, ka-ching, ka-ching. President Obama’s perpetual campaign cash-o-matic machine kicks into high gear again this week as the celebrity-in-chief heads to Hollywood for several high-priced fundraisers. But while the Democrats’ 2012 re-election team stuffs its hands into every liberal deep pocket in sight, questions about the Obama 2008 campaign finance operation still fester. Last week, the laggard watchdogs at the Federal Election Commission announced an audit of the Obama 2008 campaign committee — which raised a record-setting $750 million. White House flacks are downplaying the probe as a “routine review.” But there’s nothing routine about the nearly $3 million Obama has spent on legal expenses to address federal campaign finance irregularities and inquiries. And there’s nothing routine about the 26 warning letters to Obama for America totaling “more than 1,500 pages of questions and data that outlined compliance concerns…. Among the Obama 2008 campaign committee’s shadiest transactions that have gone unpunished: — Foreign funny money. Federal election law bans foreign nationals from contributing to American candidates. But during 2008, the Obama campaign was forced to return some illegal foreign donations … Obama raked in at least $2 million in overseas donations. — Online donor credit-card fraud. Weeks before the 2008 presidential election, investigative journalist Ken Timmerman blew the whistle on rampant phony straw contributors slipping through the Obama donation site…
“I work for the credit card processing company that is culpable for allowing the DNC and the Obama Campaign to get away with rampant online donor fraud. In a deliberate attempt to evade campaign financing laws, the Obama Campaign turned off certain security features on their online contribution page, which basically enables anyone in the world with a Visa/Mastercard to make donations in almost any amounts. I have over 7 years experience in the payment services industry, and I have never seen such flagrant disregard for online security as I have seen on Obama’s Website and ACTBLUE (DNC PAC)… I have followed the trail from the DNC to a PAC called ACTBLUE, which is responsible for the ecommerce portion of Democratic Party websites… There is no plausible explanation for these security violations other than wanting to skirt around campaign finance rules. I would vigorously argue that a large portion of Obama’s $579 million in individual contributions is in violation of campaign finance laws. Many donations may have been made by non US citizens, made in excess of the $2,300 individual limit, and made on stolen credit card numbers. This fraudulent donation scandal goes deeper than just the presidential election. 33 Democratic Candidates running for Senate have sites that are out of compliance. And a large number of Democratic House seats as well.
I also remember early on Zippy was wanting you to write in, send $5 and your name might be drawn to have lunch with him. Perfect way to get names/addresses.
Think of it, their ideas are so great they have to cheat to achieve them…hmmm?
Or like that old crook in Jame’s video, he wants to use a bat, violence much.
Yep.
Socialism:
Ideas so good, they have to be mandatory.
Unbelievable – one awkward question – is this a 2 way street- an “accepted “ method used by all parties? . Seems like it is so easy to commit this fraud , a two inch putt , with apparently seemingly no risk at all … …unbelievable
No, if we were doing it they would bring the hammer down immediately.
But, But, if the Republicans did it they couldn’t say much cause that would really shine the light on them. They always accuse the Republicans of what they have been doing, are doing or plan on doing very soon.
Republicans did it thru Winred. The operators turned small one-time donations from seniors on limited incomes into recurring donations, in the millions.
Once caught, they blamed Trump (it was not his team’s doing), got sued and had to refund almost $21 MILLION back to defrauded donors!
Why, oh why, does P. Trump use Winred??
It’s one massive UNiparty strategy. I’m sure none of the globalists are left out.
Well, O’Keefe just discovered the jackpot of donors out the 81 millions that voted for the vile demented. It is all very consistent. They know they can cheat and that they will be protected by the usurpers in the agencies. More evidence that Trump (or DeSantis) will not be allowed to win.
I disagree on last sentence -depending on circumstances, DeSantis may be “allowed” to win … operative word “allowed” – think pro wrestling and fixed scenarios ….but that wouldn’t really be “ a win” …
DeSantis may be “allowed” to win the primary. I think they have someone like Tulsi in mind for the general. Someone who will honestly draw millions of legitimate votes. They won’t have to cheat as hard.
You think Tulsi will draw millions of votes?
Quite possible. She did win one delegate in the 2020 primaries before dropping out.
The DNC is revolted by Tulsi. She isn’t controllable either. Slow Joe has a long history of being propped up by staff who feed him everything he’s for and against.
Nah, they are constantly putting her on FOX news as a wise sage. It is endless.
Watch her hand and head motions…. She looks like she had the same speech coach that Obama had: talks slow with a slight bobbing motion; turns head side to side when speaking (for no apparent purpose); clunky hand movements; she always says something like, “Look, . . I’m going to say what you want to hear as if I am some kind of expert in the subject” (but she is not).
Or, “When I was in the military, did I mention I served in the military?”
Painful to watch.
How are they running it through people’s accounts? Is it a cash app?
They’re not running it through peoples accounts. They’re just using your address and name to break up the money that’s being laundered.
Exactly.
If one is donating to Act Blue then one probably doesn’t care that their names and addresses are being used to launder money to the democrats.
Then it is Money laundering and not andFEC violation.
They aren’t running it through the fake donors’ accounts. It is a fraudulent bookkeeping scheme.
Act Blue is taking large sums of illegal “donations” and attributing all or some of those illegal amounts to various small donors on their “disclosure “ forms. Money laundering scheme.
I’m not surprised. Something similar happened to me, although a much smaller $amount, back when Obama was in office.
To make a long story short, I was online when a message popped up saying something like “see people in your city who donated to political candidates” and I was curious, so I looked at this list of names, donations, etc.
To my surprise, my name was on the list, said I donated to some group called “Act for America” or similar, but that I recognized as a left-wing organization. The dollar amount was $800+, don’t recall exactly but it was not a rounded off amount. Let’s say $867.44 for example. Had my name and my employer.
Here’s the kicker. There was another contributor on the list, identified by name and occupation and her donation was exactly the same amount as mine!
I never donated money to any political stuff and I certainly would not donate that much. I couldn’t have afforded that if I wanted to donate. Not sure if they got my name from public info – I was teaching at the time and there are places where you can see names, etc. of public employees. But who knows?
You should have taken the federal income tax deduction.
POLITICAL DONATIONS ARE NOT TAX DEDUCTIBLE.
And you never would have even had a hint of a clue, except for this random look at a posted list- _’a “virtually undetectable, ‘victimless’ crime “ -Sadly The real Victim is the American Soul
Interesting.
Might have to check next myself
Not sure where they got your name and occupation. Did you belong to a teachers’ union?
Yep. And I did wonder about that.
Was it your union doing it for you?
Now, if we had a DOJ and IRS that weren’t aligned with an unelected Globalist-CCP Axis “administration” in the White House … something might be done about this.
But the successors of Lois Lerner will be covering for ActBlue et als., not prosecuting them, much less persecuting them without cause.
Wow! Some formula they have. Using the names of prior donors to launder all that money!
Now, take this formula and reverse it. How many residents in our country never vote in any of the elections? Forty, fifty percent non-voters? Just think of all those ballots they can “harvest” in those people’s names!
That is exactly what I believe they are doing, working off an algorithm and that gives them the names of people who are least likely to care or investigate.
Did Obama telegraph / Freudian Slip this strategy in 2016? Or was it the birth of the idea?
President Obama COMPLETE REMARKS at 2016 White House Correspondents’ Dinner (C-SPAN)
Barack Obama: “Bernie you look like a million bucks! Or to put in in terms you will understand you look like 37000 donations of 27 dollars each.“
Clearly Obama was irritated at Bernie’s rise, his grassroots support and appeal to young people and the damage he was doing to Hillary Clinton. Comedians make jokes from what they hear and see around them, so it is possible that the DNC (echo chamber) was very aware of their narrow sources of money and the problem that potentially posed. Humor is often a way of relieving anxiety.
Instead of celebrating Bernie’s “populism”, Obama was jealous of it or threatened by it.
Threatened enough to steal Bernie’s nomination. TWICE.
They’re such criminals, they steal elections from themselves before stealing them from the rest of us.
Yup! Most of the people they have listed are either unemployed or retired on a fixed income ( I.e. they clearly targeted older people who they assumed would never look into something like this) and never made a single donation!
Remember Abscam back in the 70s? These guys make those Congressmen look like amateurs.
The fish stinks from the head down.
Back when there actually were some honest rank-and-file FBI agents.
Same time frame that they infiltrated the Weather Underground and recorded Bill Ayers and his pals discussing re-education camps and having to most likely execute 25 million hardcore capitalists.
Can these people contact Actblue and demand a refund ?
They would need a receipt proving that they made the donation. With no cleared check or statement, no refund.
And to that, I would say give me the proof of my donation. Where is it?
Exactly!!!!!
The left has so gutted James O’Keefe that anything he does will be scoffed at and ignored. News consumers have been manipulated into unquestioning drones.
People who were supporting Peoject Veritas were overwhelmingly supporting James O’Keefe. That support has followed him to his new organization.
We also consume the red meat produced, but some of his stuff breaks out beyond us donors into lawsuits, investigation, public rhetoric, and presumably into behavior: Dems have to drop some schemes, as when James wrecked Acorn, and move on to other evil scams.
Those of us who frequent this site are not surprised by this.
James O’Keefe is a man on a mission. He has truly grown in the job.
Adversity has just made him stronger.
Truth is a helluva drug.
Isn’t each donation tied to a credit card transaction or a check, a basic bookkeeping record? Before so much went online, companies kept paper records of every part of a financial transaction. Would think the same would hold for digital transactions.
If audited or sued, wouldn’t ActBlue have to produce its bookkeeping records of the digital trail of each processed check or credit card transaction?
I don’t think it’s ‘just’ ActBlue. WinRed, among others, looked suspicious as well, similar pattern.
I have to think the SEC is just looking the other way as these donation patterns are unnatural for a real individual donor base.
Of COURSE SEC is just lookuing the other way.
It;s headed by Mrs Peter Strzok, remember?
This story of corruption just keeps getting better doesn’t it?
Tell me, where are the republicans again?
Some more sternly worded letters?
I’m so tired of this dance, but I see most of my fellow Americans still enjoy it!
Guess we will just vote harder.
Or, all the repubs ever do is “demand answers!” Of course no jail time, nothing ever comes of it. Our judicial system is so corrupt, it would take a damn miracle to ever right this wrong. Or how about this idea, they hang those corrupted people. I bet the corruption would stop immediately.
Did anyone at Tammany Hall ever go to jail? There is a long history of election cheating in this nation, and most of it can be tied to Democrats.
I found one in my town!
You can search your area using the zip code here:
https://www.fec.gov/data/receipts/individual-contributions/?two_year_transaction_period=2022&min_date=01%2F01%2F2021&max_date=12%2F31%2F2022
What are some guesses on the source of the money?
S Bankman Fraud?
Cartel?
BLM?
Foreign countries, oligarchs, businesses, etc.
Justice for Dinesh!
Exposure of illegal donations and fraud is the death of government criminals and their operatives.Nothing Can Stop What Is Coming,NOTHING!
Here’s a question for the group:
Could these people claim these donations on their taxes? It wasn’t their money but it was their name and address… take a good $18k off my annual income that I don’t have to pay taxes would stir up some interest.
This goes way beyond taxes.
Fraud committed in your name is not a problem for you, it’s a problem for the organizations doing it.
Even the FEC should be in trouble for casting a blind eye to what is clearly a money laundering scheme.
Well except your not in the right club
Well, I think the money flows from many sources. US Gov -> NGO -> US Org ->small donor pools
Also, BLM is doing it to the tune of 83 B that is with a B
I bet in the big picture there are at least 1/2 T dollars in the pool that is working against us. Think about where all that pandemic money went to.
I know right, the ‘leaders’ of BLM got multi-million houses out of the scam, but that was just a fraction of the money flowing.
Plus it doesn’t cost that much to ‘deliver’ a piles of bricks for the ‘spontaneous’ riots of ‘bused’ in ‘paid for’ protestors.
This stinks to high heaven.
My pandemic “stimulus” never made it to me. The only mechanism they had set up to check on the status of your stimulus check was a website you could ping once a day, and every day that I pinged it, it said “You are not eligible at this time for stimulus”, except for the fact that I most certainly was eligible for the stimulus.
There was no other place you could go to complain or fix the problem. Just a website you could ping once a day. If you tried it a second time you’d get a blank webpage.
I suspect that trillions of stimulus dollars “fell off the back of the truck” and landed in the left’s bank accounts.
FEC.GOV search in my zip code found hundreds of small dollar donations by one “unemployed” individual, all to democrat causes and organizations, and almost all on the same date. Corruption much?
I see the same thing on my zip. 70’s aged lady, retired. If I could get just the ones by her, I might print, mail to her and ask if she knows she is doing this. Haven’t figured out that yet. I get them by zip but I don’t do anything with just using the name.
I found the same thing in my Zip Code. All very common names, unemployed and on the same two days. Very small donations, but made multiple times in the same day and it added up!!
I must say it’s uncomfortable watching someone going to another’s house and asking about their political contributions.
But thousands? In a year?
One would think there would be someone from government checking that, no? He should get an answer to that.
It would be better if he prefaced his inquiries based upon an unusual number of contributions rather than dollar amount.
He definitely has a story here but the method should be methodical and not impulsive.
Knocking on someone’s door is constitutionally protected speech.
You don’t think O’Keefe plans what he is going to say? You’re kidding right? Wouldn’t you want to know if your name was on the list?I certainly would. O’Keefe nails both of your questions.
Is there any low,… low enough for demoncraps?
Honestly, I’ve never seen such evil to the core like this.
Asking people to go door to door with mics or use of their phone
Asking for trouble
Better not be alone or have protection or both
I had the same thoughr. There are going to end up being provocateurs and saboteurs pretending to work on behalf of OMG that harass people and commit crimes.
This looks like a variation of the money laundering scheme H. Clinton was accused of using where the state DNC chapters were used to launder money back to her campaign.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hillary-clinton-campaign-dnc-accused-of-corrupt-money-scheme-in-new-fec-complaint
Do democrats really care if their names and addresses are used for democrat money laundering? I say no they don’t. Does the IRS care that some people are giving hundreds of thousands of dollars to democrats but only claim say 50k in total income?
As long as the money is going to the Democrats, Lois Lerner says no.
The thought occurred to me.
How do we know that WinRed does not do much of the same thing as Act Blue?
I think WinRed might also be doing this. If you go to the FEC site –
https://www.fec.gov/data/receipts/individual-contributions/?two_year_transaction_period=2022&min_date=01%2F01%2F2021&max_date=12%2F31%2F2022
and search your zip code, you can see the patterns for Act Blue and WinRed where the same person is making multiple donations – including 2-3 on the same day.
Requires some more detailed data mining to see if both are using the same scam.
If WinRed is doing the same thing, hopefully O’Keefe is objective enough to expose all of it.
Hilarious, it’s all right there in plain sight LOL!
Some person in my zip code named Mimi Stevens, who is unemployed, made 4,397 tiny donations to ActBlue over the last 2 years.
https://www.fec.gov/data/receipts/individual-contributions/?contributor_name=STEVENS%2C+MIMI&contributor_zip=22310&two_year_transaction_period=2022&min_date=01%2F01%2F2021&max_date=12%2F31%2F2022
Did you check to see if there are WinRed donors with the same pattern(s)?
I just checked my zip code and in the search results this one person kept popping up on every page.
During the same time period, WINRED received a TOTAL of only 2,373 donations from my zip code, from ALL donors.
There it is, folks. THIS IS WHAT THEY ARE DOING.
One possible course of action here would be to make an anonymous whistleblower complaint to the media.
Search your zip code to get the sketchy donor activity.
Print it out to pdf format
Sign up for a free email account (different service than your main email)
Email the data to all the local media in your state – pick a reporter, not just the station
Include a link to this article and say you’re following up a potential money laundering scam
Send the email from a Starbucks or some other place with free wifi so the email isn’t from your home network.
Just maybe cause a s-storm where the local media starts grilling elected officials and see if it gains traction.
I’m going to research further. Unfortunately i live INSIDE the swamp.
Did a analysis of my small hometown for 2021/2022, and found very similar patterns for both Act Blue and Win Red. Multiple small donations from the same people, many of limited means. It appears that both of these PACS have perfected and are perpetuating a money laundering scheme.
How do you get a count on the single person? I put a name in the box and it doesn’t do anything. I have one of those in my zip code.
I just clicked around until it happened.
They do. I checked my zip code. My report showed the same address being used multiple times by both groups many, many times, but using different names for each wing. I say ‘wing’ because it’s pretty clear this is a concerted effort by the Uniparty.
Merrick Garland and Chris Wray and the FEC approve of the fraud since it benefits Democrats.
There are several plausible scenarios I can think of.
First is that these people are just unlucky to have their name, address, and employer picked by someone or some bot at Act Blue as the ones to duplicate for the laundry.
Second, they are paid to be pass-throughs. Like what Dinesh D’Souza did but with a bonus $$ angle.
Third, even more unethical but maybe actually legal, Act Blue is scamming old or slow thinking people into recurring donations and are draining their savings.
Know your friend:
https://dc.claremont.org/blm-funding-database/
Also here is a good place:
https://www.fec.gov/data/browse-data/
and here:
https://www.opensecrets.org/
As long as the UNIPARTY keeps power, we the taxpayers money will laundering into endless wars etc, kickback into their pockets, and campaign donations, so that they can hold on the power, and play this scheme forever until the country decays, the people become slaves.
It’s pretty obvious that high tech has provided the means for corruption of this magnitude.
With a corrupt judicial system, there may not be a way to get rid of electronic corruption short of giving up all devices.
It’s hard to imagine having to do this but even if we got rid of one use of electronic fraud…like Dominion….they’d come up with another.
There does not seem to be another long term solution.
Pen, paper, typewriters, stamps and rotary phones may be in our future.
So President Trump was onto the money laundering two years ago.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8726765/Trump-slams-Democrat-fundraising-platform-ActBlue-untraceable-unemployed-donors.html
Remember ActBlue and WinRed are just bundlers. If you contributed $25 to five different candidates, it would be $25 five times. The one guy that was clueless might have his daughter or wife that is donating in his name so if they donated $100 to 10 different candidates, it would show up ten times. My question is how much does ActBlue and WinRed charge to handle donations? Where does that money go.
ACT BLUE CORRUTION and ELECTION FRAUD. Will the MAOcrats ever be PROSECUTED! Just think how many more FRAUDULENT SCHEMES the MAOcrats us to STEAL ELECTIONS.
“So tell me zis website again…”
“It’s called ActBlue. com–if all the lines are busy, keep trying!”
Now do the same thing for WinRed.
Very interesting. I just pulled down the report for my zip code – not a dense city area in Indiana. Obvious signs of the same scam except it goes for blue and red causes…. Winred and Actblue. Multiple names at the same address on the same day but apparently by party affiliation.
I also looked at the names and one lady donated over 1,600 times to the tune of $53K but at multiple addresses. Yes, it could be more than one person with the same name but very unlikely due to the name. This is a big scam.
This is how foreign governments launder money through the DNC.
Something this rotten has to be bipartisan, that is to say, UNIPARTY.
McConnell AND Pelosi laundering their Ukrainian Aid: MITCH MONEY AND BITCH MONEY.
Could an outfit like Judicial Watch or True the Vote run a legal sting operation on this?
Have some of their people nationwide make a small ~$5 donation to Act Blue on the same day (April 1 would be good).
Then check back 3 and 6 months later to see how many additional donations have been made in their names.
This report by Roman Balmakov adds some context to O’Keefe’s endeavor and might be of interest: Election Watchdogs Discover $200M Laundering Scheme Using “Smurfs” – YouTube
The face of a democrat. Criminal and dumb as a post. I feel sorry for some of them.
O’Keefe has really hit on something. I checked my zip code at the FEC search page and found at least one instance of a woman with a very ordinary name, i.e., Smith, who has donated hundreds of times in small donations to various progressive causes and Act Blue and it only showed 12/22/22 and 12/23/22. Two days. Unbelievable!
So…. if these people used the FEC information and included that with their tax returns, do you think the IRS would do anything about it? Just wondering. 🙂
Just a hunch, but just maybe…… maybe, they could use the same model to reproduce votes, with voter rolls, as in prev voters, to include dead ppl…? hmmm This investigation could go a long way in proving MO.
I always thouht that the voter fraud algorithm basically followed
the patterns I’ve noticed on views on You Tube.
If it follows, augments, furthers the narrative, then the count is absurdly
adjusted upwards. Witness millions of views of anything late night comedians
say downing Trump. Look at these same person’s viewership ratings, and
the youtube views are many degrees higher. Youtube: 2.7 million views. Nielson
ratings, same show, same night 425, 000 viewers.
On the inverse side: the postings furthering anything that don’t get nuked
have odometer roll backs. Recent example: the new song “Trump Won”
currently at 92,000 views. 2 weeks ago? 360,000 views.
I still believe the You Tube patterns of winners vs losers is what they
utilized to fine tune the votes for the voter fraud we’ve seen . And, at
a guess, I would say the pattern goes back to , oh, 2011.
Act Blue funds Antifa and BLM.