The logic within the research outline is silly. Unvaccinated people have a 72% higher rate of severe vehicle accidents than vaccinated drivers according to the study.
Could it be the difference between rural vs metropolitan populations; one drives frequently, for longer durations and distances, while the other does not?
Apparently, that type of commonsense possibility did not make it into the analysis. However, the authors of the study do suggest insurance companies should start considering insurance risk hikes based on vaccination status.
(Via Yahoo) – If you passed on getting the COVID vaccine, you might be a lot more likely to get into a car crash.
Or at least those are the findings of a new study published this month in The American Journal of Medicine. During the summer of 2021, Canadian researchers examined the encrypted government-held records of more than 11 million adults, 16% of whom hadn’t received the COVID vaccine.
They found that the unvaccinated people were 72% more likely to be involved in a severe traffic crash—in which at least one person was transported to the hospital—than those who were vaccinated. That’s similar to the increased risk of car crashes for people with sleep apnea, though only about half that of people who abuse alcohol, researchers found.
The excess risk of car crash posed by unvaccinated drivers “exceeds the safety gains from modern automobile engineering advances and also imposes risks on other road users,” the authors wrote.
Of course, skipping a COVID vaccine does not mean that someone will get into a car crash. Instead, the authors theorize that people who resist public health recommendations might also “neglect basic road safety guidelines.”
Why would they ignore the rules of the road? Distrust of the government, a belief in freedom, misconceptions of daily risks, “faith in natural protection,” “antipathy toward regulation,” poverty, misinformation, a lack of resources, and personal beliefs are potential reasons proposed by the authors.
The findings are significant enough that primary care doctors should consider counseling unvaccinated patients on traffic safety—and insurance companies might base changes to insurance policies on vaccination data, the authors suggest. (read more)
It’s a Canadian study, so start there.
At least we won’t suddenly drop dead while driving 80 down the highway.
Died suddenly!
Vaxxidents.
Good one…stealing it! 😂
Myocarcrashes
😆
It’s also another way to pry into areas of our lives that are none of their damn business.
Ironic since it was the insurance data that started showing vaccinated people suffering from myocaritis and other ailments. Wonder how that will effect their health insurance rates?
i guarantee they are suffering from inflated death and injury right now, and looking for ways to recuperate some of that revenue. And they also KNOW that there is no way in hell that the fascists will allow them to point out the obvious place to raise rates.
Great point
Insurance companies do what they have to do in order to survive and make a profit. Politics can’t play a part in those decisions–just statistics.
‘Lies, damn lies, and statistics’
Good luck with that.
ESG is for the most potentially coercive and punishing companies as well as the Useful Deviants.
Auto vs health insurance.
But yeah, the actuaries know. And they’re freaking out.
Anything for a buck.
As reported in Ed Dowd’s book published yesterday: “Cause Unknown”: The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 and 2022. “Cause Unknown”: The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 & 2022 (Children’s Health Defense): Dowd, Ed, de Becker, Gavin, Kennedy Jr., Robert F.: 9781510776395: Amazon.com: Books
Ed Dowd has been amazing on this topic.
I may be wrong, but I believe health insurance companies (who are the ones seeing excess mortality levels), are generally different legal/corporate entities from property and casualty insurers (who actually saw big savings/profits over the past 3 years due to significantly reduced commuting mileage).
I figured that the most dangerous drivers in the USA are young men 18-25 and they are not getting the shots because they don’t want to die suddenly from weird heart issues.
Of course, maybe the vaccinated are too sick to drive?
Young dudes also paid attention when Cardi B stated her cousin in Trinidad lost his capacity to perform due to the vakks.
that would do it for me at 20.
You ain’t kiddin.
Young girls on cell phones have to be tilting that age old equation the other way to an every greater degree . . .
Correlation is Not Causation: Example:
Per Capita Cheese Consumption correlates with People Dying by Getting Tangled In Their Bedsheets, R = 0.9471.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fj84iRTUoAkrnwe?format=jpg&name=medium
That means that Cheese Eaters are 31.5% more likely to die from getting tangled in their bedsheets than Unvaccinated drivers are likely to be involved in an injury auto accident.
Figures lie and Liars figure.
But, but…SCIENCE says!
$cience
There, fixed it.
<Per Capita Cheese Consumption correlates with People Dying…>
Deaths may be caused by eating large chunks of cheese…
Make America grate again 🙂
Lol!
Cheesy, Dude.
😉
https://www.chewboom.com/2022/05/02/dairy-queen-debuts-new-cheesy-dude-sandwich-alongside-returning-cheesy-steak-fingers-in-texas/
I’m glad I’d have to drive 1500 miles for one of these . . . well, lots more than one, that’s the point . . .
What about bedroom cracker consumption? 🙂
What crackers do in the bedroom is their own business.
Here’s another one.
Global Warming Driven by US Postal Rates
https://joannenova.com.au/2009/05/shock-global-temperatures-driven-by-us-postal-charges/
Hey, it’s “correlation” just like that Canadian “Study”. 🙂
BS
Dying people tend to drive fewer miles.
dead people even less
Saving their energy to go vote.
Yeah, they only come out on election/selection day, Voting Demonrats 🤔🤗
P$y0ps.
Mind virus to demonize and punish those smart enough to recognize the real dangers presented by the makers of Coupvid.
They just cannot help themselves, no matter how far the reach, how thin the reed, they make up new aspersions and insinuations relentlessly.
These people just won’t leave us alone….
in the meantime, reporting is sparse on what life insurance companies are paying out to sudden, unexpected deaths.
The things that wouldn’t just go away.
it’s protected information, kinda like ya health care vaccination record.
Canada again.
Yes, Canada (along with Australia and NZ) appear to be the testing sites (and/or injection sites) for many of these sorts of initiatives and narratives. The government-sanctioned, de-banking of the Convoy participants was another gem from Canada.
Lies, damn lies and statistics.
Wow! Silly says it all.
Oh, almost forgot the Insurance Companies get their rate hike as promised for toeing the state (glo-bull-ist) line, by the Canadian swamp rats.
FCAN and FJT
The unvaxxxinated are the ones healthy enough to work, so the insurance companies are going to where the money is.
The good news in all of this is that it demonstrates how few arrows the Schwabians have left in their quiver. Man, they are really grasping at straws now. The death rattle won’t be that far off.
The results are deceptively easy to explain.
During the study period, all the vaccinated* people were hiding beneath their beds.
*It’s not a vaccine.
Latter Day Maskholes look scared to be at the grocery store.
There was no study “period”. The conclusions are based on a review of already existing medical records.
Invisible: Yes, I realize this. But, we’re playing make believe.
Thanks. I have such a poor imagination.
How do they know who didn’t take the slab jab
They reviewed the medical records of people who had been in accidents requiring an emergency medical response.
Its the new math, better than common core, its called; I have my head up my assmath.
Now do stats on gunshot injuries for blacks, AIDS for homos, etc and base health insurance premiums on that.
Also, I believe the asian community is the lowest vaxxed by race. Coincidence?
Too easy.
This is another form of “regulatory taking”. It works so well stealing our land and property, why not or money and our rights?
“I’m sorry mr driver, but before I write this ticket, can you tell me if you’ve taken the toxxine? I need to jot it down for skewing of data.”
it is a skewed study; nothing more, nothing less. I love the way we try to read into something
this way and thataway when the answer is much more simple. A scam.
Seriously?! Whatever happened to the whole HIPAA law? Why in the world does my car insurance company have any right to ask me anything about my new private medical information?
They don’t. This entire so called study is a crock.
I asked that same question in a comment I posted in Open Thread. And….how were these researchers able to access encrypted government files?
The statistical analysis wasn’t performed by or for an insurance company, and HIPAA only applies to US medical records.
Remember the word games they always play. Wasn’t it that if you got a Covid 19 shot that you were not technically vaccinated until 2 weeks later.
Could it be that you have the initial Covid 19 shot and four boosters but you have yet to get your fifth and sixth booster so technically according to them you are not vaccinated.
I bet this is the case and they are playing word games. Bunch of liars they are.
Oh, these people are crazy. Everyone knows it’s vaccinated people who stroke out behind the wheel. Look at all those pilots!
And what about the 40 percent jump in life insurance claims for the vaccinated? Will vaccinated people cover the higher life insurance premiums?
There hasn’t been a 40 percent jump in life insurance claims. Mortality has not changed. Maybe it will later but not yet. That 40 percent story is just that, a story.
Mortality has changed in statistically significant ways since 2020, particularly among the young, fit and healthy.
I’m speaking of the country as a whole. Young fit and healthy people don’t buy life insurance. Mortality rates have not changed.
The companies they work for often do as an employment benefit.
Ok so what? It’s temporary coverage based on employment.
J Scott Davison, CEO of Indiana insurance company OneAmerica offers group life insurance policies, which generally cover working people 18-64 years old. He says deaths in this age group are up 40 percent from pre-pandemic levels. All insurance companies are seeing an unprecedented death rise in this normally healthy age group.
Vaccinated people are dying from heart attacks, strokes and cancer. Have you seen the blood clots the embalmers are pulling out of corpses?
Gee, what’s next, higher rates for home loans?
Surely.
Social Credit Scores will dictate all our costs and “freedoms “
Higher car insurance vs sudden death ….I’ll take the former
tell them you had jab it costs them to check it and do not give up privacy eg hippa
Well, that’s just dumb… look out!!!
“This is OnStar. Are you OK?”
“This is the NSA. Your cell phone’s accelerometer has detected a collusion… I mean collision Unfortunately, your political views exclude you from the services of our emergency response affiliates.”
Pure, unadulterated BS!! It is never going to stop………..
Higher insurance for unvaccinated? Sounds to me like a lawsuit waiting to happen.
It looks like punishment to those who declined to get the jab.
They clearly so hope.
There’s sure to be a lawyer open to suing over any grievance, but I doubt a single statistical analysis will lead to anything except perhaps more studies.
It is common knowledge that individuals who knowingly engage in risky behaviors often take more than one kind of risk, but it’s a stretch to equate vaccine hesitancy with willful risk-taking (driving unsafely on purpose). People accept or refuse medications for all kinds of reasons, good, bad and indifferent.
Wouldn’t purposely NOT having a substance of unknown contents or side effects being injected into your body be considered less risky behavior than having it? I would think that the people who didn’t get injected are the more risk adverse types and would therefor be the safer drivers.
16% of whom hadn’t received the COVID vaccine.
There is going to some cheap land in Canada. If the Chinese dont take it first.
just think about how STUPID that remark is. think about it.
im having a wtf moment
Or it could be young people are less likely to be jabbed. Or many other things.
What about those reported vaccidents?
My guess is they are trying to find new ways to pressure the purebloods to take the death jabs by raising their insurance costs.
Bingo! If fear doesn’t work, try fining us.
The so-called “study,” which intent was to create a false impression, left out the significant factor that people who live in large metropolitan areas where they rely primarily on public or other transportation are of course not getting in as many vehicle accidents, and mandates being more stringent in many cities means that vaxx rates are likely to be correspondingly higher.
While understanding the seriousness of government “ creep” in all our Canadian affairs.
This latest one is actually quite funny..here in British Columbia I.C.B.C. the (Insurance Corporation of British Columbia )
Is essentially run by the Provincial Government. It truly is a farce, easy to scam and irrational.
What’s next Fatties too are at a greater risk of accidents, as checking “ blind spots” are more of a challenge. Add to that their slower accelerator to brake reaction, never mind if they drive a stick.
Trial lawyers here are in litigation with the Province as the Province has enacted “ No Fault” 😂 insurance capping payouts at $5000.00 and then taking care of an injured parties medical costs until a set date.
Canada is getting desperate for revenue as we do not have a printing press for our currency with the seemingly unlimited capacity of the U.S.
Folks are pushing back, tax revenues are down, demand for health care is rising dramatically.
Folks are saying F*** it, and in increasingly greater numbers withdrawing their consent to be governed.
Cheers!
However, unvaccinated people are much less likely to “die suddenly” of a heart attack while behind the wheel. So there’s that. 🤡
From personnel observation and study, people who pick their nose and eat their boogers are more likely to be vaccinated than unvaccinated.
The truth of this study is, like America they have allowed people in the country that have never owned a vehicle or have never driven in a country that has asphalt or lines on the roads.
i agree with that. i used to live in a packing plant town with a sara lee and a tyson plant.over the last 5-6 years there has been an influx of africans from god knows what countries and pacific islanders.and the local dmv gives out the driving test in 24 different languages.you can spot em a mile away.they are driving brand new escalades,yukons,jeeps etc and either are driving 15 mph in a 35 zone or they stop at every intersection whether they have a green light or are at an uncontrolled intersection.man i’m happy i moved outta there.
City dwellers don’t drive.
Also their original alleged study was brought to you by Moderna and Phizer in the Wayback Machine of which they have now eliminated all connections.
Busted!
Also they’re losing a boatload of $ on life insurance so you know, they have to make up that deficit somewhere.
Hmmm…. I wonder who did the study. As for insurance rates, I am sure companies’ own actuaries can figure out what’s appropriate without any outside assistance. I assure you that life and health insurers will be looking at the mortality and morbidity rates among the vaccinated.
It’s a university-sponsored statistical review of post-accident medical records:
https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(22)00822-1/fulltext#%20
Unbelievably stupid.
I would say corrupt but stupid works too.
It’s the age difference.
Younger people have more accidents.
Younger people have more unvaxxed.
Therefore unvaxxed have more accidents.
Notice in the study itself they deceptively hide this by lumping all the 18-39 into the same age group. If they split out, say, 18-25 year-olds, the gimmick would be exposed.
“During the summer of 2021, Canadian researchers examined the encrypted government-held records of more than 11 million adults, 16% of whom hadn’t received the COVID vaccine.”
Why exactly does the public Canadian government a) have a database which links drivers’ licenses to injection status in the first place, and why is that database b) being made available to private researchers?
“Why would they ignore the rules of the road? Distrust of the government, a belief in freedom, misconceptions of daily risks, ‘faith in natural protection,’ ‘antipathy toward regulation,’ poverty, misinformation, a lack of resources, and personal beliefs are potential reasons proposed by the authors.”
And here we have the actual point of this nonsense: “distrust of government, a belief in freedom… antipathy toward regulation… personal beliefs” are bad things associated with “poverty, misinformation, and a lack of resources” which endangers the public welfare.
Note that since “poverty” is previously mentioned, and that it follows “misinformation” the “lack of resources” here refers to government propaganda.
The underlying assumption expressed here is that, in the name of public safety, “distrust of government, a belief in freedom… antipathy toward regulation… personal beliefs” are things the public-private matrix has a duty to “correct.”
Public-Private Partnership.
Modern Fascism.
A two-way outsourcing of tyranny.
Any study that does not properly account for confounding variables is junk. Tell me, are three tangerines greater than or less than two pears?
Depends how many pancakes will fit in a canoe.
HOGWASH
Perhaps the ‘vaccinated’ are languishing in their covid sickbeds instead of getting out and earning their living instead of ‘working from home”. Just a thought.
Stanley Cup…..
This doesn’t pass the smell test. So, apparently now Canada has decided for a new way to get people to take the jab…..car insurance. Surely they can be more creative than this.
Officer says let me see your vaccination card. FU
What about a co-pilot discount ? It works for airplane pilots suddenly dropping dead.
Backseat Driver take the wheel!
What could possibly go wrong?
Remember when President Trump tried to take the wheel of the presidential limo from the back seat and all hell broke loose. We are all lucky we weren’t run over by that madman!/s
People that wear sparkly socks tend exhibit totalitarian tendencies according to a new study by the Fidel Castro Institute.
“Scientific studies” are no longer any more credible than political polls, since the desired outcome is carefully factored in the development of the study.
And, of course, as we learned from the pharma studies on the shots, any information accidentally discovered, disproven, or contrary to their pre-determined conclusion, will simply be left out of the final results.
That the American Journal of Medicine would publish the non-sense study is indicative of their integrity as well.
Speaking as someone who had to read studies as a work requirement, I have to disagree on the issue of integrity.
Most studies published anywhere are crap, and the outlets are fully aware of it. That’s why professionals don’t give single studies much credence until/unless the conclusions are replicated by many others studying the same topics. NO REPLICATION = NO FACT
“No replication”….Exactly.
Someone should tell that to the self-important, deluded grifter Judy Mikovits.
I thought redlining was illegal.
Political punishment of unfavored groups has become de rigour … thanks to the Deep State
Statistical manipulation … computer aided … has been defined as “science”. Sorry, it’s not science. It explains nothing except what the programmer wants it to. See: “proof” of global warming
The math is what it is, and the numbers in the study are probably accurate. It’s the interpretation of what those numbers mean that is weak.
Still … correlation is not causation … and the “numbers” are meaningless. Not science.