Arizona Senator Kyrsten Sinema announced she is changing her political affiliation to “independent”, a smart and strategic status considering her upcoming Arizona election challenge.
As an independent in the Senate, not much will really change as far as the voting and caucusing is concerned. However, from the standpoint of having to gain votes for reelection in Arizona and accepting the complete chaos that is now Arizona voting, the strategy will likely play well.
As a Democrat Sinema was likely to face a well-funded primary challenge from her left, while simultaneously she will likely face a strong opponent from the Republican side, by taking a place to avoid the primary and position herself as a third-party candidate, she can likely carve out enough votes to win a 3-way race.
(Politico) – In a 45-minute interview, the first-term senator told POLITICO that she will not caucus with Republicans and suggested that she intends to vote the same way she has for four years in the Senate. “Nothing will change about my values or my behavior,” she said.
Provided that Sinema sticks to that vow, Democrats will still have a workable Senate majority in the next Congress, though it will not exactly be the neat and tidy 51 seats they assumed. They’re expected to also have the votes to control Senate committees. And Sinema’s move means Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) — a pivotal swing vote in the 50-50 chamber the past two years — will hold onto some but not all of his outsized influence in the Democratic caucus.
Sinema would not address whether she will run for reelection in 2024, and informed Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer of her decision on Thursday.
“I don’t anticipate that anything will change about the Senate structure,” Sinema said, adding that some of the exact mechanics of how her switch affects the chamber is “a question for Chuck Schumer … I intend to show up to work, do the same work that I always do. I just intend to show up to work as an independent.” (read more)
Now there are three in the US senate who claim their ‘independence’. She joins Sanders (VT) and King (ME) who both ‘caucus with the democrats.
I will say that, thus far, she has shown more cajones than those two, but unless Manchin grows a set and does the same, I say ‘yawn’!
CLAIM is the keyword in your statement…….if a man says he is a woman and still has a penis but wears women’s clothing is he a woman or a man?…..this is the same situational status as Sinema….if she caucuses with the Dimm/commies and votes with the Dimm/commies, what does it matter what she calls herself…..King and Sanders are both PROVEN Socialists/Marxists
What is Murkowski of Alaska labeling herself?
Her website refers to her as the “United States Senator from Alaska” and it highlights her support for many bi-partisan Bills.
LEEEEEZA votes with the Dimm/commies more than not and has stated she will directly oppose PDJT in any endeavor into the future
I understand that but I was just wondering if she actually calls herself an independent or has she finally declared herself a Democrat considering she was not elected as a Republican.
Maybe she is waiting to see which way the wind blows.
So far, she still ‘claims’ to be an R…..don’t think that will last much longer though. She is NOT an honest person anyhow. She doesn’t even like most people. Stuck her nose in the air and avoided almost everyone at the “governors” dinner….unless they had big bucks for her.
About Sinema: Someone needs to find and post the video of Sinema laughing about how she got the people of AZ to vote for her implying how stupid they were and how clever she was! Please someone find it. She is a piece of work as President Trump would say.
An evil witch that openly supports DemocRats every chance she gets.
FJB, China Mitch and ranked choice voting.
She still calls herself Republican. The Alaskan Republican party disowned her and it didn’t matter. She’s still carrying the “R” next to her name. She runs on her “pro choice” status.
Thanks
There is NO reason that an organized MAGA couldn’t have put up a candidate that took votes away from Mrs. Ugly.
We had a great MAGA candidate, but ranked choice voting allowed Dems to vote Murkowski. If it were a normal election, she would’ve been primaried.
Lisa is a Republican. The state party apparatchik just lifted her censure.
To Heck with the “party” it all, or they all stink anyhow. I hate labels .
Bi partisan because she and three GOPe senators support them? Please, seeing her exit the clown car is proof of her stature and convictions.
Believe it or not, she is and always has been voting Democrat. She is just afraid to change her initial.
Sen. Angus King is a libtard dirt bag…my opinion as a Mainer. He and libtard Colllins need to go!
I, too am a Mainer. Angus is an old liberal elite. Susan is a clown who has NO interest in any and all conservative values. With this sleezy “ranked choice voting” we will never get rid of them.
How did rank Choice voting get past in Maine? I lived there for 30 years and fortunately I moved because I think things have gone really sideways there. What the heck is going on?
That is about the only thing one can say about ‘ranked choice’ it keeps those not wanted where they know they can remain on the final ballot, and too many vote because the name is familiar, so it must be OK never bothering to look at her background or voting record.
We have said that about merkouski for a long time, but nobody else has stood up….
Tshibaki stood up, and Mitch the Bitch put her down.
It was NOT “Cajones” and to say it WAS, I submit demonstrates that you were “played”.
Synema and Manchin played the ROLE, long played by Collins and Murkowski with occasional ‘pinch hitting’ by McStain, Romney, etc.
When the Party “in the majority” has a base, that is screaming for them to pass legislation the Leadership DOES NOT WANT, the Leadership crafts the Legislation, allows it to come to a floor vote, than has just enough members to vote against it, to kill the legislation.
McConnell used this technique with Obummercare R&R, and they just used it this last session, with REPEAL of the FILLIBUSTER rule, which leadership DOES NOT WANT, because it would rob them of this very useful technique, for thwarting the will of the electorate.
So, they advance TWO major pieces of Legislation (something you NEVER see them do!)
One (to satisfy the leftist base) to repeal the fillibuster.
The OTHER, to overshadow and distract everyones attention, a $700 BILLION BBB bill.
Then, they have Manchin and Synema announce they are voting No.
Two months later, they RE-INTRODUCE a slightly trimmed $600+ Billion BBB bill, which then passes.
And nobody notices they aren’t re-introducing the Fillibuster rule repeal; WHY NOT?
Because the leadership DOES NOT WANT to repeal the fillibuster rule!
One other thing; IF the leadership did not want these “squishy” Senators; Collins, Murkowski, Romney, Synema, Manchin etc to be voting “against their caucus” they would not give them Chair positions on committees, and would withhold Senate Campaign reelection funds.
THATS how leadership deals with Senators that don’t vote the way the Leadership wants them to vote. Notice we see NONE of that.
Synema knows that the Az State R party is MAGA Dominated, and she is positioning herself accordingly. That is all.
I raise my glass to you, sir. Well done. The original BBB was stripped of those elements repugnant to the donor class. Leftists in the House were promised BBB would be paired with the infrastructure bill .Pelosi reneged on this promise, separating the two bills . The infrastructure bill went to the Senate and passed easily with Republican support. BBB version 1.0 was killed by the assigned villains – Manchin & Sinema. ( I believe it was Glenn Greenwald who termed it The Doctrine of the Rotating Villain) The party leadership will ALWAYS find the necessary votes to kill legislation the donors don’t want.
Damn, take a breath. Opinion, my friend, opinion.
And no, not played. I’d have to give a crap about it.
Again, ‘yawn’!
I agree with what you said, but given the 2020 & 2022 elections, with all the Democrat cheating & GOPe subterfuge, I do believe the Democrats have taken Arizona for good now, if for no other reason than the big cities are now populace-laiden w/ indoctrinated 18-40 yr olds, illegals & enough Democrats, dead or alive, to vote more than once, as well as those who were born in 1890 or earlier.
I am just heartsick but glad we decided not to retire in Arizona.
Ah, the 1890 voters. You must have seen that PA.gov link that was posted on reddit (I believe, can’t recall exactly) right after 2020. No names, just birthdate and county of residence. Four search parameters pertaining to the mail-in ballot: date requested, date sent, date received, and date tallied. Page after page, as in thousands of people, with birthdates between 1900 and 1920 who somehow were able to breeze through the process.
Of course, this data was hastily put behind a password after a day or two.
There are people sitting behind desks, collecting salaries, that are facilitating it all – perfectly comfortable with the lawlessness.
The word is “cojones.” Unless you are referring to her drawers. In which case, I stand corrected.
Damn again.. How ’bout ‘balls’… ‘testicles’ … gonads’.
We good?
Sundance, if you’re following, I will do my utmost to ensure any future prose posted by this old fart will rate a gold star by those inclined to correct my spelling, incorrect sentence structure, or overall grammatical incompetence.
Now, back to my original
‘yawn’.
Yawn, she will vote no differently then when she marched in lockstep to Fuhrer Schumer. Die fahnen hoch!
they are all the same……they never change……just pretend.
How is Bernie and independent when he ran for President twice as a Democrat? Is he “fluid”?
Gender-fluid, party-fluid
LOL. She just put her vote up for sale.
Oh, the games being played……..so tired of the corruption.
It appears the corruption is growing.
As they look us straight in the face.
I hate it. In fact, I hate it so much, I’m almost totally done with so called ‘elections’
I think I like her more than most REPUBLICAN lawmakers..
She is a sizeable upgrade from the travesty that was McCaine.
No, she is McDtain 2.0 trying to take on the “Maverick” mantle he developed.
McStain pretended to be a “Maverick” to conceal his Uniparty nature, she is doing the same.
There are only four votes in Congress that matter;
Majority and Minority leaders of both parties, in both Houses; all the rest are proxies.
At least, in the Uniparty system, which is about to change, in the House.
In the next session, the majority of Rs in the House, have been elected in the last two elections, and are MAGA.
Which means they finally have SOME political muscle.
It may well be similar to the last,session of the Az Legislature, which actually had a one vote R majority, but one was the corrupt RINO Speaker, and he had one Decepticon.
So, LOTS of legislation was written, but leadership “bottled it up in committee” an audit WAS ordered, but any legislation stemming from it was blocked, and leadership acting as spokesman, mischaracterised the results.
In short, its going to be a battle, between the MAGA forces and the RINO Leasership, and its going to be fun to watch!
I am looking forward to McConnell and McCarthy being thrown to the curb. Also, RINO Ronna McDaniel. If all 3 are not taken out, that tells you all you need to know about this current (corrupt?) “supposed’ Repub party.
Just don’t hold your breath. You won’t make it if you do. I tried it, and it actually doesn’t work……. you get light headed but don’t faint.
The biggest problem is that most of those who were elected don’t even read the bills they vote for or against…..they just ask a ‘flunky’ which way to go.
The bar was set pretty low re McStain. So she is not actually a “sizeable upgrade.”
And she is after all, still a Lefty Lib. Her “change of status” was just another of her antics to re-fresh herself.
You mean she has a dick?
Carpet inspector.
Yep, Pinto hatchback to a Pinto wagon!
But she still caucuses with Dems and provides the Dems with a Senate majority so she is simply trying to psych out voters into believing something changed. Anyone who isn’t willing to OPPOSE the Democrats for their corruption, for what they’ve done to destroy election integrity, and the damage they’ve inflicted upon Americans since 11/3/2020 isn’t worth spit.
Exactly! If she had any principles she would have moved over to the GOP side. Likewise the other lib fake Tulsi.
@fka Sinema
Frankly, the GOP is full of so much incompetence and corruption that I can’t blame a Senator for being independent.
I think I like her more than most REPUBLICAN lawmakers..
She voted to CONVICT Trump for both the first and second impeachments. She’s a disgusting libtard just like Tusli Gabbard. is
Wrong think. She’s a clever, scheming, nasty narcissitic tart, with her Finger in the air. You choose which finger I’m talking about.
If she is still going to “caucus” with the Democrats (like Bernie Sanders), it’s just an empty publicity stunt.
Publicity stunt, yes, but as noted this could help her win reelection, so more of a career preservation move. Things stay the same as a legislator, as donkeys, like zebras, don’t change their stripes.
Complete chaos, maybe, but created by and used to the democrats’ advantage.
“she can likely carve out enough votes to win a 3-way race”
The Democrats Voter Fraud Central may have something to say about that
They will have passed ranked choice voting ,before she comes up for reelection.
Manchin flips I am 100% sure …
this would let him do that and likely fool enough WV voters to AGAIN elect him to the Senate……they do not learn a leopard does not change its spots in that state
I hope you’re 100% correct when you are 100% sure.
I’d rather Manchin resigns immediately and causes a special election to be held in West Virginia.
When this doesn’t happen, are you going to come back here and admit you were wrong?
Manchin would be foolish to remain a Donk. Schumer and the Dem party screwed him regarding coal and oil production when Schumer lied to him to get his vote.
Manchin promised his voters a nuclear option. The deadline for promised action by Schumer has long passed.
Yup.
Manchin wasn’t played, he was playing us, not that most Treepers didn’t know his “promise” was crap.
It sounds and feels like whoever is really pulling the strings, really wants the shared rules in effect in the Senate. This Sinema move feels less like her own decision and more like a counter to the Georgia election.
Prove me wrong, lol
Republicans doing appologetics for a stinking Democrat like Sinema. My, how refreshing, NOT!
What I want to know is when McConnell is going to switch to Independent from Democrat. Maybe he could follow her lead.
Surely you jest!
Independent(s) what a joke.
Caucus with the democrats.
Take orders from Schumer.
Campaign financed by democrat donors via same laundering funds, PACs and unions.
“Ballots” in State, putting them in office, are controlled by democrats.
But … hey it looks good on the TV news, at least better than the optics of Joe Manchin during his fake outrage moments.
I dunno. Sinema has PO’ed the hard left by refusing to deep 6 the filibuster and hanging up the Build Back Broke farce.
She votes as told to vote or no votes, no money, no senate seat.
The democrats (uni-party) focus group test all their stuff and know what to pass, timing when to pass and when to have a token failure enroute to passing.
THIS!
She vas juist vollowink orders, and the whole point of the excercise was to submit the fillibuster legislation, but NOT have it pass, to satisfy the left base demand.
Just like R&R of Obummercare.
Its Kabuki theater.
this is a scheme of sorts, but the reason and end story has not been written
It could be she knows something about the shoddy Nov 8 election debacle and doesn’t want to be tied to it.
Sinema’s tied to it whether she likes it or not. She is just like that guy who said to never underestimate the stupidity of the American people. Only she said it about AZ voters after she was (s) elected..
All she did was increase her purchase price.
She knows the folks in AZ are pissed about the election in 22′.Since she comes up in 24′ she can say “See, I’m not a dem vote for me. ” Of course she will vote with the dems
So …. Shanghai Mitch McConnell is the real majority leader in the Senate again for the 118th Session. //s
49 R
48 D
3 I
Just as with the 117th Senate session:
50 R
48 D
2 I
Mitch has been the one sitting at the head of the table, controlling Congress, for many years.
He may have Pelosi sitting to his Left, and McCarthy (or Ryan or Scalise) to his right, but HE calls the shots, “from the bench” while they go out on the field and execute the plays.
He is “the man behind the curtain” the very center of the Swamp.
Honest question: What can be done to get him out of his position?
Only term limits could and would do that. Age should, since I’m old, I know about that stuff; the brain slows down some and that happens to every one……Not to all, but it does slow down.
I’m still waiting for ‘term limits’, but not holding my breath on that one either.
Term limits for senators and representatives would have to be implemented by a constitutional amendment ala the 22nd Amendment to limit the terms of a President.
Grandstanding but still a smart move. There are more voters registered as independent (33.9%) than donk (30.7%) in Arizona. Rs make up 34.7%.
Independent is not a party.
So, as with Comrades King and Bernie S … the democrats have to rig the election if she wants to stay in office, to 30% donks vote for her as the “friends” with whom she caucuses are not so popular with the Independents.
Who is advising her?
Seems fitting since she swings both ways personally.
Thanks Sundance.
Simple strategy.
No cartwheels or champagne here.
She’s just like WVa Joe, doesn’t like the hot lights Maybe a little more bathroom chasing is in order.
If she’s no longer a Democrat, will they still help rig the Arizona election for her in 2024?
LOL..No, it’s a Republicant’s turn, but if it’s MAGA, it’ll be a no-go.
They think we can’t see them..isn’t that cute!
After she was elected and attended President Trump’s state of the union speech, she was the only democrat that stood and applauded for the things he said that she agreed with. She earned my respect then and still has it now.
I don’t agree with her on social issues but otherwise on most issues I think she is doing an acceptable job.
She voted to CONVICT Trump for both impeachments.
Bro….it’s a belief like that that’s going to make her stunt work. She votes with the Democrats the vast majority of the time and will continue to.
That would be because she is a democrat.
You must be a dem or a fake rep or maybe you do not know what you are talking about.
You are probably right.
I should have shown my conservative side by being down on the border helping Ted Cruise hand out teddy bears to the poor refugee children.
Or I could help John Cornyn with his many conservative endeavors such as handing out billions of dollars to Ukraine.
Yes I am so stupid I can actually respect people with whom I disagree about politics.
Doesn’t sound like you know much about the value of negative Democrat strategies or who is actually WORTHY of respect.
So she’s still a Democrat, but her pronoun is “Independent.” 🥴
Nicely done.
What a dirty business American politics is.
A lot of gaslighting.
Swamp gas at that.
Swamp ass gas
I imagine she’d like a three-way just fine.
We need a very strong candidate for that AZ Senate seat. Maybe Kari Lake can run for it.
Maybe we can back her to the hilt on her Governorship before we concern ourselves with consolation campaigns?
That fight, while likely to be brutal and protracted, may be one of the most important tools we have to crack the edifice of corruption that has virtually entombed our nation.
She should run for that Senate seat in 2024. It’s hardly a consolation.
I wish they didn’t allow other parties to caucus with the Dems or GOP. We would have had the Senate majority from Jan 2021 to Jan 2023, and it’s possible it would have helped us to retain that majority after the mid-terms.
Why would either wing of the UniParty reject a useful fellow traveler?
I don’t even know where that allowance came from. Or if any 3rd party Reps or Senators have ever caucused with the GOP. I’ll have to do some research.
I wish they didn’t allow other people in other states to supply funds if they don’t live in that state.
Question: So, if you still keep making beef soup the same way but declare you are now a vegan, but nothing will change and you still eat your beef soup, are you a vegan? Or just another Senate virtue signaler a—– looking for some handout leverage, declaring you’re an “independent” thinker, when nothing will change values or behavior, as declared. https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/14.0.0/svg/1f432.svghttps://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/14.0.0/svg/1f911.svg
Both Sinema and the Republican candidate will be swamped by the same tidal wave that drowned Kari Lake and everyone else at the top (but not the bottom) of the Republican ticket.
Let me shorten this up for you, they will steal it as per usually.
What happens tho’ if one other flips and goes republican? Manchin? Now what happens to the balance of power? And will this set off a domino effect? Byedone blocked.
Even if he flips to Republican, it would be R50 D47 I3, with VP tiebreaker.
She’ll probably have plenty of funding for her campaign. She cast the deciding vote on a bill this year only after reform of the carried interest tax loophole was stripped out. Now the hedge fund industry owes her.
Kyrsten Synema won in 2018, BECAUSE the Az. State Republican party, ran a splitter MAGA candidate, Sheriff Joe Arpio, in the primary, to bump out the MAGA candidate Dr. Kelly Ward, giving the R candidate for the General, to the RINO, McSally.
KL, BM, AH, and Msrk Fitchem DID NOT have to compete with “splitter MAGA Candidates” because that same Dr. Kelli Ward is now the Az. State Party Chair, with a supportive State party.
Hence, Synema knows she will not have that same “blocking” action (by the State Republican LParty) when she runs for reelection in 2024.
SO, she is positioning herself to avoid a primary challenge, from either the Left or the Right.
She will comptete once, in the General, in a 3 way race, instead if a 2 way, so needs less ballots to win.
She also MAY not benefit from extensive ballot fraud operation, …..
Richer and Gates have already been censured by the State R party, unfortunately after they were elected, so they retain their positions…
However, they can’t run for reelection as Republicans, thats certain.
Nope, this Leftist Uniparty wench is just an “independent” FILTHY LIBERAL, instead of just being a FILTHY LIBERAL Until you vote like an independent, perhaps just shut your Marxist trap.
How is that changing political parties in the middle of a senators term, is not considered as committing a fraud against her previous constituents and funders for possible political gain in the future?
Depends on the constituents, n’est-ce pas?
Her job as a senator is to represent the interests of her state, not the interests of a given political party.
She is not committing a fraud against her constituents.
She said that she wants to distance herself from the partisan aspect of politics. I wish more would.
How would you feel if you voted for some GOP Senator and then he said he was leaving the party? If you had known this prior to the primary you might have voted for someone else.
If he said he would not caucus with the Democrats and would continue to caucus with the GOP caucus, I doubt that I’d get too upset.
Sinema won her senate seat in 2018. If she had run and won this year then made her announcement, that might have been deceptive. But that is not the case.
Quite frankly, she has always had a bit of an independent streak. Declaring herself to be an independent strikes me as more honest.
Even her wardrobe sometimes declares that she is not happy to be pigeon holed.
Every one has the right to change their mind……even someone just elected to a 4 year term to another office can change their mind and try to run for a different office even if their current one hasn’t finished…..and leave it empty.
Right now, Republican politicians in Louisiana are waiting for Senator John Kennedy to announce if he will or will not run for governor in 2023. If he runs, it is unlikely that he will draw a serious opponent in the primary. These guys cannot stand up a campaign if they cannot see which offices will be vacant.
Kennedy just won re-election for his senate seat last month.
She has a degree of a independent streak however this was a tactical electoral move.
but none of them do that. They only go for their party, not what the state wants, but maybe because the state doesn’t know what it wants either.
Very few senators represent the interests of their states, they represent Democrat/Republican Inc.; K Street and the multinational corporations now.
Oh Come ON! You believe her?!!
Big Whoop!
This is just more Uni-Party NOISE to distract from the real Communist infiltration issues at hand.
Dismiss it and talk to the hand.
Political solutions to our woes are running thin now. The line was crossed circa 2020 and there’s no going back. This is where we find ourselves today. The longer the so called peace can be kept the more likelihood mankind folds to the masters. The technocratic surveillance state brings forth the end of Free Will.
Next to life, Free Will and consciousness are a close second.
Lol…does it really matter?
1/20 of the current republicans in the house and 1/10 of the republicans in the senate basically “caucus” with the democrats anyway.
(statistics may not be completely accurate but you get my drift.)
What does a party affiliation have to do with an election? Fractal analysis seems to remove all question of election legitimacy, in my opinion. I go to dinner, look at a menu and select those items I can afford based upon cost. The only thing missing for our elections is the menu.
MUST READ – Our Most Important Report of the Midterm: Election Fraud, It’s Voter Roll Manipulation – Not Ballot Gathering!
They know who voted.
They identify infrequent voters; when that person fails to vote, they offer their concierge service – they vote for them.
We just finished the Fractal analysis for a state, where an America-First candidate, with a 10-point lead, lost a statewide election.
You be the judge. You tell us, here, if chasing ballots would have changed that outcome.
** 42,000 changes to the election rolls within weeks of the election – most were illegal.
** 21,000 new voters added to the election rolls, within 29 days of the election – almost every one is illegal.
** 8,000 voters appear to live in a business – each one would be illegal.
** 1,951 people received ballots at one address, and then voted from a different address – every one is illegal.
** The Republican candidate – with an 11-point lead in the polls – lost by around 21,000 votes to a woman who was afraid to debate her!
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/12/election-fraud-voter-roll-manipulation-not-ballot-gathering/
Richard Baris, The People’s Pundit, asserts that there almost certainly were enough Lake voters disenfranchised on election day in Maricopa County to have swung the election outcome.
He has written an analysis that has been included in Kari Lake’s lawsuit. He spoke about the issues during his podcast today. Start at 1:52.
https://rumble.com/v1ztm32-episode-308-inside-the-numbers-with-the-peoples-pundit.html
I just want to point out that Lake never had a big lead in any poll, but she was consistently in the lead by 1-4 points in the couple of weeks leading up to the election.
Zzzzz…..
It’s just a political stunt. Nothing changes. SOS .
They won’t be calling her down anymore, now they gotta suck up to keep her on their side.
I heard that a Rasmussen poll was just released asking AZ voters who they voted for in ‘18. Although Sinema was the official winner, polling has her 9 points behind McSally. Maybe she realizes this and that it will be a problem for ‘24.
It’s all just smoke and mirrors, and won’t make a difference in the scheme of things.
Today’s story that Senator Sinema leaves the Democrat party to become an independent is the biggest bunch of nothing burger. She becomes another Bernie Sanders type independent. Which is to say she’s still a Dem. Will caucus with the Dems. And she’ll support 90% of the Dem agenda. This is all window dressing to fool the gullible Arizona voters and avoid a Dem primary that she likely could not win. It changes absolutely nothing in the Senate where the Dems will still effectively have a 51 seat majority.
Head fake … she is admittedly still a voting democrat, values and all.
She’s a liberal and she likes being in the senate. She has no chance of winning the democrat primary and she knows it. She watched as the AZ establishment used Kari Lake’s head as a floor mop on election day. They will do the same to her in the primaries. She runs as an independent or she finds another job.
As I mentioned to another commenter, this was a tactical move on Sinema’s part.
So why bother if nothing is gonna change? Stupid is as stupid does as the saying goes.
Sinema is positioning herself to avoid losing to a hard left challenger in the AZ Dem primary elections in 2024.
AOC has sounded off. I suspect the social justice Dem org (Marxists) will definitely run someone under the Dem banner to try to throw her out of the Senate.
***
https://resistthemainstream.com/aoc-sounds-off-after-sinema-leaves-democrats-registers-as-an-independent/?utm_source=gettr
I read that there are already 3 pacs that have been formed to take her out.
it changed from dimwit to now independent yea right.. it has a history of being a looni tic fringe idiot. BTW it is a evil clown and will stab the US constitution in the back…
We’ll see by Sinema’s actions what she is & to whom she’s beholden.
Unimpressed after January 06, 2021, when no action to get involved with investigating claims of fraud in Az vote.
Several calls to DC offiice answered my question of the vote by saying, “Senator Sinema said the vote is accurate.”
I committed to watching her from then on because this voter sees the Emperor’s naked as a jay bird, no matter who swears he’s clothed.
Will watch, listen, & make up my own mind on her claim of “Independent.”
Uniparty at its best! Equilibrium should be maintained, unexpected Dems’ gains beyond plans, so a piece on the chessboard is told to change colors . HAHAHAAAA….
Flip the coin over…it looks the same. Sinema just spells it DImocrat now.
Joe Manchin might as well join her.
For that matter, I think all senators need to change their party registration…it’s not like we don’t know who they are when you peel the first layer of onion
I hate raw onions