The U.S. Supreme Court has issued the following statement:
Supreme Court – “Yesterday, a news organization published a copy of a draft opinion in a pending case. Justices circulate draft opinions internally as a routine and essential part of the Court’s confidential deliberative work. Although the document described in yesterday’s reports is authentic, it does not represent a decision by the Court or the final position of any member on the issues in the case.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., provided the following statement:
“To the extent this betrayal of the confidences of the Court was intended to undermine the integrity of our operations, it will not succeed. The work of the Court will not be affected in any way.
We at the Court are blessed to have a workforce – permanent employees and law clerks alike – intensely loyal to the institution and dedicated to the rule of law. Court employees have an exemplary and important tradition of respecting the confidentiality of the judicial process and upholding the trust of the Court. This was a singular and egregious breach of that trust that is an affront to the Court and the community of public servants who work here.
I have directed the Marshal of the Court to launch an investigation into the source of the leak.” (LINK)
Blah blah blah. The leak was from a liberal so even if the leaker is discovered there will be zero legal repercussions for the guilty, just like Comey and Felonia von Pantsuit.
It’s important to ID the leaker, even if we know nothing will be done about it most likely.
They likely already know who. This is a PR stunt by Roberts.
I’m betting it’s Sotomoron .
katanji, who’s already getting briefs. timing too coincidental.
That was my first thought, or someone in her staff, who later may agree to take the fall for it, so she can remain on the court.
Yep,,,,clerk Amit Jain for Sotomayor and she might even have known it was going to happen?
One of Roberts’ clerks?
This incident clearly proves there are Trump & Obama justices, non-partisan is a lie.
Jis name is Amit Jain. Google him.
Any Clinesmith or Brown-Jackson or Schumer or Durkin or Pelosi or Clinton or Newsome relatives clerking in the SCOTUS?
Vindemann? are you there?
I imagine, that Robert’s word, as politicized as things are, even with the D. C. BAR (!), could keep a clerk from ever getting a law in any jurisdiction.
Wouldn’t be Suprised to find out the Wise Latina was the leaker…
She is too dumb. One of her legal clerks did this. The left will make this person a hero, book deal, MSNBC show, tampons for life.
And lace the tampons with habanero pepper extract.
“Tampons For Life.” Now THAT Is Absolutely Hilarious.
Well, with the Democrats these days that could giving tampons to men and 167 other varieties of human sexes.
I have read some of her opinions. Sloppy, at best, and largely inarticulate.
Do the lefties always have to scrape the bottom of the barrel to get their Latina/black/female/underserved, etc candidate?
Yes
Yes
The soft bigotry of low expectations was installed at the Supreme Court
Tampons for free… even if it’s a guy??
Sure,..according to THEM, “Guys” need tampons too,…can have menstrual cycles and get pregnant; hence “persons who menstruate” and tampon machines in boys bathrooms at school.
Were you unaware?
Yep, prob. identifies as a birthing person. Disney would be proud.
Remember,they don’t know the definition of a woman.
Yes, didn’t you know; menstrual equity!!
Pads are put in women’s bathrooms for the trannies. No joke.
Sorry, let me correct my earlier guess. One of the CLERKS for Katanji is what I meant. I just can’t see, after all this time, suddenly Sotomeyer pulling this. I see it more as an immediate “Things are going to be different around here from now on” smile.
BTW, OT, but just saw this when put link in search bar: https://www.thedailybeast.com/meet-the-conservative-treehouse-the-blog-thats-ground-zero-for-insane-trump-sht. Haha. Embarrassed much? At all?
Are they front or rear tampons?
Remember the Awan Brothers?
Non US Citizens?
They skated for doing multiple felonies.
Nothing to see here, move along.
Debbie Wasserman Shultz: [Daydreaming of being ravished again by Awan Bro. #1 in the House Cloakroom] “…sigh…..”. Removing a swatch of fabric cut from his dress shirt from her purse and sniffing it to remember the ecstatic times and Axe Body Spray (special branded “Lahore” scented edition) …
“Honey! What are you doing?..” Her husband’s screechy voice rudely interrupting her idylls as she stared out from her Palm Beach mansion patio chaise towards the glittering afternoon waves of the mysterious Atlantic. Her sudden jolt of reality causing her fat leg to knock over the stack of legal papers of her husband’s impending real estate fraud trial. “Shoot!….oh nothing dear…. catch that paper before it gets blown into the pool!”….
“Debbie Does Karachi” Chapter 8, page 173.
Very, very good!!
“We at the Court are blessed to have a workforce – permanent employees and law clerks alike – intensely loyal to the institution and dedicated to the rule of law.”
Missed it by THAT much!
Just like the fbi
As they say in the movies, what a maroon.
That was the quote of the day.
5 years from now, tic toc, waiting for justice. The memory of the country will be long gone by then. We’ll be forced to sing whatever Scary Poppins tells us.
The leaker is probably one of Sotomayor’s law clerks. She knew-Roberts knew, heck probably all the liberal lefties on there knew. The Marshall investigation is all for show. Just like Mueller and Durham. Nobody is serving jail time or getting impeached for this. The swamp tentacles are just too deep to root out the creatures.
Alas, chalk another one up for the Marxist liberal regime. They’ll get Kavanaugh and Barrett to change their vote through intimidation and Roberts will continue his reign of terror on conservative values. Talk about a clown world.
kavanaugh is already on board and the last katholic trump put on there.
Very fitting picture of the Supreme Court. The sun going down on the court and the storm clouds are rolling in since the radical leftists and dims go about destroying our court, laws and country.
My money is on Roberts. About 20% of those reporting a crime committed the crime. The only difference between Roberts and a criminal is a fingerprint card.
If the vetting process for judges is anything like the security clearance process I went through in the Air Force and Air national Guard, the FBI already has Robert’s fingerprints.
Apparently he tried to keep it, nothing like bantering over a baby’s life.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/another-scotus-leak-chief-justice-roberts-willing-uphold-mississippi-law-banning-abortions-15-weeks-not-want-overturn-roe-v-wade/
Hey John…Do you think you could look into your improper conduct of the FISA court under your administration while you’re at it?
Thx a mil…
My money is on, not a lib in the SCOTUS, but the 4th branch.
Skimmed the data off the electronic storage or off of internal emails.
Not the first time we’d see supposedly private emails being leaked to cause a ruckus.
I agree & just wrote the same thing before refreshing the page.
That makes sense! Thanks.
I wouldn’t be surprised if they blame Russia for a hack. FBI is sneaky that way. Personally I think the FBI spied on SCOTUS
Given that the IC is documented as having “spied on” Congress, Presidential campaigns (going back 60 years!) and at least ON sitting POTUS,….AND given the importance of SCOTUS, it is not possible that they HAVEN’T been spying on SCOTUS, for many years.
SIMPLY. NOT. POSSIBLE.
I am not sure that this is going to end up HELPING the Idiots In Charge, in their headlong quest, …in fact it MAY end up being counterproductive to their goals.
This one needs far more than two weeks, perhaps as much as two YEARS, to see all the downstream consequences,..the leaker MAY have done a significant good, to the AmericaFirst cause.
WAIT, lets see what happens!
That would be a good rumor to start. The leak wasn’t internal but external. Some pro-abortion millennial working as an admin for an IC agency (CIA, FBI, choose your letters) got the transcript through said agency’s surveillance of the computers used by the justices of the Supreme Court. Give it a Code Name: Deep Cloak.
Maybe the document wasn’t leaked by an SC staffer, but instead was obtained via a hack of an SC computer by an alphabet agency.
Could even be an intercept of a remote user’s laptop accessing SC’s “secure” network.
Then again, as the SCOTUS uses old-timey printing presses to put out their decisions on special paper and don’t allow cameras in the Court, I can imagine the Justices using quill pens to write on parchment scrolls and not using a computer (or at least a nod to modernity, at least a Smith Corona 1920’s manual typewriter used by Chief Justice Holmes.). The leaker would then have to transcribe the scrolls onto a computer at home after sneaking out the papers in their codpieces. There will always be a place where craftsmanship is valued!
They only find leakers when they want leakers to be found.
Not holding my breathe.
does anyone else find it coincidental that a justice was just confirmed who is probably there measuring for drapes as we speak. and he radical feminism is well known.
but then there are so many reasons for this: money transfer, misdirection, GOTV, etc.
Highly unlikely they will identify the leaker; Politico can hide behind the first, assuming it wasn’t leaked to them anonymously.
And, unless the leaker is stupid enough to tell someone else they leaked, confess, or took their cell phone with them when the met with Politico, HOW do you “catch” them?
And, all that is before factoring in how political such an invedtigation inevitably IS.
Real question that will never be answered, was it a single, rogue lawclerk, or did a Judge DIRECT them to leak it?
And from the Left, or from the RIGHT?
And that it is highly unlikely we will EVER know.
Time to put the gonads of the upper management at Politico in a vise and slowly start squeezing-leaker’s name, rank, and serial number will instantly appear. With additional pressure hard telling what secrets will be reveled.
But isn’t this the same type of situation as James O’Keefe, who received Biden’s daughter’s diary from an anonymous source. He chose not to publish and even turned it in to the authorities. Yet, he was still monitored via a FISA for a year and, then, arrested in the dead of the night.
The FBI should do the same to Politico, if they were equally KGB on both sides of the political spectrum… which they aren’t.
Certain ‘research segments’ of bigpharma need the byproducts of extremely late-term abortions to advance life-enhancing (read: eternal youth) programs.
The very definition of evil; slaughter the pure and innocent so that the corrupt (corrupt of flesh and corrupt of mind) prevail. In sum: high-tech Moloch worship for a soulless generation.
Chief Justice Roberts owns this crisis of confidence in the Court.
Everyone already knows who perpetrated this act.
Chief Justice John Roberts leaked it….. probably….
I would not put it past him for his backstabbing flippyfloppy decisions on Obamacare I and II and his dereliction of duty in overseeing the corrupt FISA Court.
The elites will not stand for a shortage of baby parts to keep their health and looks! I’m just thankful for a glimmer of hope. The SCOTUS was incredibly arrogant to ever rule on abortion. Now we have 65 million murdered unborn babies! We are seeing judgement now! God will always judge a nation that allows genocide and slaughter of the most innocent! I pray these judges stand strong and overturn.
Perhaps Roberts leaked. He wants everyone to know that he did everything he could to prevent Roe from being overturned. It’s also been leaked that Roberts attempted to horse trade other cases in order to prevent Roe from being overturned.
If the religious right wants to completely alienate the US population it will continue insisting violently raped women must be forced to carry the result to birth.
I pray it’s your daughter that benefits from your dictates, and that she doesn’t go mad.
This is completely uncalled for. The various states should decide and if SCOTUS rules that it is a 10th Amendment issue then the individual states will decide which carve outs to include or not include. To wish harm on someone else’s kids for a belief that you don’t hold betrays your utter callousness and disregard for any regardless of how conception was achieved. You have my lasting contempt for your disgusting post.
Rather than posturing and adding further stigmatization to the victims of rape you should read and listen to those who have lived through this experience. The book Speaking Out About Their Pregnancies, Abortions and Children Resulting from Sexual Assault gives real life examples. If you take the time to look, there’s a lot info available from women who have courageously spoken about their experiences. Hopefully it will open your eyes and heart.
We should remember that all people are created equal even if all people have not been equally created. Both the woman and child are victims of this crime. Eliminating the baby does not erase the memory nor the trauma of the crime. In fact, majority of women who elected or were coerced into aborting suffered additional trauma as a result. It’s sad to think how quickly erroneous arguments and assumptions are made to conclude the 2nd victim (the baby) should be aborted. Educate yourself by listening to the women who have dealt with this, not the propaganda.
Ad Rem – please address this post. It is disgusting.
UPDATE: I see now that Ad Rem has already banned this poster for his rudeness on several threads.
The Marshal doesn’t have any investigative power so nothing will happen. Roberts didn’t want the FBI to investigate and the FBI likely wouldn’t do a real investigation anyway. My money’s on Sotomayor having one of her clerks do it. A large part of the electorate, probably more than half, doesn’t care a thing about states’ rights or rule of law or process or what’s in the Constitution and what isn’t. They only care about results. With an open southern border, more and more of those people will be voting, which is why the elites want the southern border to be open. When we import people with values foreign to traditional American values, they bring their values with them; they don’t adopt ours. The idea that we still follow the rule of law, which made America exceptional compared to other countries, is now laughable.
It was probably John Roberts who leaked this. Would not be surprised!!
‘Judicial Insurrection’: DeSantis Reacts To Leaked SCOTUS Draft Opinion
https://yournews.com/2022/05/03/2338748/judicial-insurrection-desantis-reacts-to-leaked-scotus-draft-opinion/
We all know the leak was deep state. And we all know there is zero accountability in our corrupt nation.
The Supreme Court has no credibility since they refused to hear Texas v. Pennsylvania.
this leak is just another nail in it’s coffin.
Well noticed.
Too often even SCOTUS opts for “stability of the status quo” rather than the law or justice.
it’s the nature of establishments.
For all we know roberts was the leader.
If he had any decency, he would be ordering the Jan 6 defendants to be free on zero bail.
Why do we always use the verbiage that the deep state initiates. Leak, who in their right mind thinks it was a leak. It was a planned drop just as everything else they do is. Jeesh, haven’t we seen this a million times already? Everyone trying to figure out who done it. They must get a good laugh every time we fall for their crap.
I had the same idea. Maybe Alito did not draft an opinion that is anything like the one claimed to be a leak. Perhaps the opinion was written by outsiders, and claimed to be a leak, to create support for Democrats.
In any case, Roe v. Wade is not an issue of Originalism v. Living Constitution; it is strictly the issue of stare decisis, which I assume Alito fully supports. It was decided on the basis of the right to privacy, and the claim that the right to privacy is not in the Constitution is irrelevant in view of the Ninth Amendment:
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Actually, the Supreme Court release claims the document is authentic. If so, I don’t understand Alito’s reasoning.
1) Sotomayor Clerk Amit Jain Is Probably The Supreme Court Leaker!!!
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FR3YodzXsAA09dv?format=jpg&name=large
FJB/LGB!!!
2) The Lineup Of Supreme Court Clerks, Amit Jain Is One Of Sotomayor´s Clerks!!!
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-supreme-court-names-latest-lineup-coveted-clerkships-2021-07-02/
FJB/LGB!!!
They already know the leaker and I wouldn’t be surprised if Roberts knew about it before it was leaked… A coordinated Bushie/Obama stunt to gin up the pussyhats for November…
yea because we need more secret courts!
Around 3:30 pm today Mark Halperin of Newsmax claimed that that he had several reliable sources that the leak came from the conservative side. Halperin is not a conservative and this appears to be a false report.
Ironic it is the same day as the debut of 2000000 Mules? Another smoke screen to rile up their base and riot. Will they really ID the thief? Will anyone spend years in jail???? Or is this just another whoops – nothing to see here?
“The Marshal of the court.”
Well, hope that is better than the FBI who would find Rand Paul and the Boston Bruins guilty of the leak.
Where are the unredacted JFK files?
How about the hag’s 33,000 emails?
Obozo’s college applications and grades?
HumpHer’s laptop files?
Why hasn’t all of this information been “leaked” already?
Crickets………..
The leak couldn’t have happened without Roberts approving it.. ..ordering the Court Marshal is an utterly useless stunt and everyone knows it.
Roberts is a compromised man and a Trojan horse… this has been known atleast since he saved Obamacare.
Meanwhile Schumer has threatened Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barret with impeachment for perjury during their confirmation hearings.. he conveniently doesn’t mention Roberts..
How does Schumer already know Roberts is not a part of the majority opinion? We dont know if its 5-4 or 6-3 ??
Its an open secret that Roberts will never vote to overturn Roe v Wade and he has now started a dangerous and open campaign to influence Kavanaugh and Barrett..
People who think it is some liberal SCOTUS justice behind the leak, dont pause to think how they could do such a thing without getting caught … they couldn’t have gone this far without Roberts approving of the leak himself
No one will be caught or punished. Just a continuation of our once great nation circling the drain of history.
This was not a leak from a rogue clerk. It’s a well planned strategy to change the narrative and focus for the November election. Take the focus off of skyrocketing energy and food prices, millions flooding in at the southern border, parental rights to determine what their children learn in public schools and replace it by an emotional Armageddon about abortion rights. Millions of women who would have abandoned the Democrats will now think hard about continuing to vote for them over this issue. Will GOP frame the message that gets them a win? Their track record for ineptitude is legendary.
What if Roberts leaked it himself to force the 5 judges to change their opinion?
Entirely possible. The leaker is undoubtedly one of the clerks serving the four communists on the court. Although speculation has centered on Amit Jain, a clerk for Sotomayor, who is an apparent communist and has a personal connection to the apparatchik at Politico who received and reported the leak.
there has been a coup.. and any Nation-State pretending there has not been is complicit in an Act of Treason against the former U.S. ..
the supreme court has no standing.. same with the legislative branch.. and the executive branch..
they are jettisoned political entities of a former Country.. as are the Nation-States..
..now Nations..
State Constitutions.. State Rights.. and State Laws.. are the Supreme Law of the Land now..
..which Nation-State is going to be the first one to start acting like one..
Is Justice Roberts telling everyone who reads the statement that this is not the way they are going?
Although the document described in yesterday’s reports is authentic, it does not represent a decision by the Court or the final position of any member on the issues in the case.
Will Chamberlain has a theory on who the SCOTUS leaker is and it’s a good one…
*******
Will Chamberlain
@willchamberlain
Meet Elizabeth Deutsch. She’s currently a law clerk for Justice Breyer.
And, in my humble opinion, she’s the most likely person to have leaked the draft Supreme Court opinion in Dobbs, purporting to overturn Roe v. Wade.
Cont reading full thread in Reader App…
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1521685968939630592.html
She was hired by Justice Breyer.
https://davidlat.substack.com/p/confession-of-error-justice-breyer?s=r
“U.S. Marshal Launches Investigation” ?? Even SCOTUS doesn’t trust the FBI.
Ohhhh….
So it was an “intensely loyal betrayal”.
Comeyspeak.
She wasn’t intentionally grossly negligent
Integrity and Judas Roberts should not be in the same sentence.
The leaker – Amit Jain. Google him.
A new Colorado law is written so vaguely (on purpose) that it allows post-birth abortions – infanticide / murder – up to 28 days after birth.
The new law declares abortion to be a “fundamental right” in Colorado. It denies all rights and legal protections to any “fertilized egg, embryo, or fetus” up to birth. It also prohibits cities and municipalities from banning abortions through local ordinances. America…..this is your Democrat Party supporting murder of children while also supporting open borders and human child trafficking.
https://www.independentsentinel.com/colorado-law-allows-post-birth-abortion-infanticide-up-to-28-days/ /
My initial reaction to the photo at the bottom of the article was to see a sunset of the court… the court slipping into an inevitable period of darkness from which in may not emerge as it entered. A moment later, I remembered from my visits to the court that this photo was taken facing east. I just hope there are still decent minded people at the U.S. Marshall’s office who won’t be intimidated or bribed so that we may know the truth. Justice served is another matter…
So, just a thought…Kentaji-Brown was confirmed to the Court, but not seated because Justice Bryer hasn’t stepped down. Everyone is pretty sure a clerk leaked this, but what if a Justice did? They would most likely get disbarred and removed from the Court, meaning Kentaji-Brown would become a Justice and then when Justice Bryer stepped down, there would be a second spot to fill on the Court.
Just speculating. Perhaps the leak came from the conservative side in order to stop John Roberts from trying to persuade one of the 5 conservatives from switching sides. After all, Roberts did write both the majority and minority opinions in the Obamacare ruling in 2012 when he sided with the lefties.