Every time the U.S. government attempts to clarify the biolabs in Ukraine, they end up making things less clear.
In the most recent example, Deborah Rosenbaum, the assistant secretary of defense for nuclear, chemical, and biological defense programs, told the House subcommittee on Intelligence and Special Operations on Friday that “I can say to you unequivocally there are no offensive biologic weapons in the Ukraine laboratories that the United States has been involved with.”
In a fact sheet produced March 11, 2022, the U.S. Defense Department admitted to working with biological weapons facilities in Ukraine [LINK]. “The United States … has invested approximately $200 million in Ukraine since 2005, supporting 46 Ukrainian laboratories, health facilities, and diagnostic sites.”
As the current story is told the U.S. government was coordinating with the Ukraine government on biologic research facilities, many of which were left over from the former Soviet era. In/around the time the Russian invasion was feared, they worked quickly to destroy the pathogens, because they were worried what might happen if the Russians took control of the facilities.
This begs the obvious first question, if the U.S. Defense Department was working with Ukraine since 2005, and they could destroy the deadly pathogens in a few days before the conflict, why didn’t the Pentagon destroy them in the preceding 16 years?
The second question targets the issues that are more opaque. The DoD says the U.S. has not been involved in “offensive biological weapon” creation in Ukraine. Technically, all of the weapons in the U.S. military are classified as “defensive” weapons, ergo the Department of Defense. Every weapon is defensive until it is used; then, depending on the circumstances, the use of the weapon changes its classification to offensive. Why would biological weapons be any different?
By the current standard of Defense Department definitions, all of the biological weapons they might be working with Ukraine to develop would technically be classified defensive weapons. As a result, saying “there are no offensive biologic weapons” is a rather moot and irrelevant point.
Three points:
♦ Point One – Russia and the U.S. Pentagon both agree the U.S. government was working in Ukraine in biological weapons labs.
♦ Point Two – Both Russia and the U.S. admit these were/are deadly biological pathogens.
♦ Point Three – The biggest difference between the two positions is that Russia says these were offensive weapons, and the U.S/Ukraine saying these were defensive weapons.
The debate is not about whether the U.S. Defense Department was operating and funding biological weapons laboratories in Ukraine. The U.S. government has now made that admission. The debate is now about the purpose or intent of those weapons.
If Russia was investing in biological weapons labs in Mexico, and if the Russian military was working inside those labs along with Mexican government officials, I suspect the United States would conduct a special military operation in Mexico to remove that threat.
The only thing in DC that isn’t corrupt are the cherry trees and I have my doubts about them.
last cherry tree i saw was crooked.
Ah – one of the ones George Washington failed to chop down.
Why would we have 46 biological labs in a Nazi country? Some one needs to ask that question.
Because we ran those Nazis and trained many of them on US soil?
But remember: they’re NICE Nazis.
I will bet Bayer could provide some,
Paperclips 📎. . . .
But 🤔
N ever
A
S traight
A nswer
To get around US laws against biologic weapons research.
One lab for each gender?
What kind of answer would satisfy your need to know? Would you even believe anything at this point? I don’t!
^^ This ^^ This ^^ This ^^
Remember when we were going to just win the war in Ukraine by proving we were the better people?
Time to stick a spoon in that pudding.
Yeah. How many do we “need” and for what?
Gain of function tee hee hee
Yep – ask the Republicans.
HA HA HA!
You don’t know which”end” their answer will come out of.
Last time I checked quite a few of those cherry trees had lost their cherries.
erotic
All the cherry trees have all recently transitioned to other “fruit” trees, IYKWIMAITYD.
erotic and KINKY!
and rosenblum is in charge? how many citizenships has she? is she in mossad along with vicky nuland and her husband robert kagan?
just curious.
Why is it that the KM keeps showing up in charge of such nefarious facilities and products?
“It’s a man, baby!”
Are there any non-transgenders in the Biden Junta?
No
I ask…..ARE THERE NO NORMAL PEOPLE IN WASHINGTON DC? Has Jobama surrounded himself with only weirdos?
Do the inhabitant$ or frequent visitor$ to DC and other towns have any similarity to the $inful inhabitant$ of the biblical towns of gamorrah and $odom?
https://www.biblestudytools.com/bible-stories/sodom-and-gomorrah.html
…and they want to appoint a sc judge that is in part to have a say in civil rights – but can not even define a gender ( woman).
So, can the person have clarity of meaning about race, creed, ethnicity, or religion?
Based on words and actions of the ( un) ‘qualified’ candidate, it does not sound like it…
[ while they hide other information].
which may only plea$e the c c ?
Imho
Mossad? Nah! Israel wouldn’t have her on a bet.
Are US funded biolabs there? Yes.
Has anything good ever come from one? No.
Is our government a lying, corrupt, war mongering entity? Yes.
Do I believe anything they say? Oh hell no!
Case closed.
I can say to you unequivocally that you are correct on all counts Betsy!
“…on Friday that “I can say to you unequivocally there are no offensive biologic weapons in the Ukraine laboratories that the United States has been involved with.”
If I am reading that correctly, she is saying that “there are no offensive biologic weapons in the Ukraine” labs RIGHT NOW. The question is then whether there WERE biologic weapons in the Ukraine labs at any time in the past.
To be fair, “…has been involved with…” does imply in the past.
Nevertheless, they are indeed liars and expose themselves all the more with every obfuscation.
Also implies there may be offensive biologic weapons in those labs that US has not been involved with.
So there is a Clintonesque: it depends on what the meaning of “involved” is.
There are none there NOW that the US “has been involved with”, but were there some that the US was involved with in the past. Or were there “defensive” biological weapons or were there offensive biological weapons that the Ukrainians were working on without the US involvement.
Their language is so abstruse, so ambiguous, that it can be interpreted several ways. I wish someone had come back with more specific questions.
Actually, “there are” is present tense. “There were” just isn’t included. Not even in your quoted clause.
Statement is incredibly narrow. Your quoted clause restricts it further. What of weapons that we have not been involved with? Are there some there now?
If the quote were simply “the U.S. has never been involved with” we wouldn’t have any misunderstanding. But she has left open whether or not the U.S. has ever been involved with offensive weapons in these Ukrainian biolabs.
Speaking of NAZIs, just how would one classify the chemicals used in those showers? Offensive, defensive, terror, population control, murder? If you guessed pesticide, you win a prize. It was used for fumigation and delousing. It is so easy to play games with what you call and how you classify your weapon.
Hopefully, they destroyed them all, whatever they called them and whoever was involved with them. But I don’t trust that ever changing part of this store either. Why was Nuland ‘concerned’ that Russia would use them, if we had destroyed them?
Not to diminish your spectacular comment, in any way Jim, It seems as though it’s something akin too potato, patato. Dealing with these disgusting weasels, it’s virtually impossible too know for sure. God Bless The Great State Of Tennessee. And for good measure, Sweet Home Alabama.
Words are turds, and those turds will be molded into whatever $h!t we want to shovel this week. This country has turned into the insane running the insane asylum.
The point is there are no such things as defensive biological weapons.
(If there were we would call them medicines.) Bottom line is “there are biological weapons.”
and I’m still trying to figure out just how to classify the mRNA vaccines that our government has been pushing
More word games….. Can they EVER just tell the truth?
No !
No, they cant ever tell the truth. The truth has become the mortal enemy of the state and the lie MUST be maintained at all costs. It has become exactly what Joseph Goebbels said, to the letter. Goebbels was a “bad” Nazi, not one of the “good” kind of Nazi’s found in the Ukraine.
The last 3 episodes spoke to this issue. Look for links provided as good citations.
https://rightwirereport.com/tag/rwr-truth-be-told/
Meet Regina Dugan- the head of DARPA- I have a sneaking suspicion she’s part of all of this and let’s say this video shows she isn’t to be trusted:
https://gettr.com/post/p1390zy78f1
Link on rumble
https://rumble.com/vzgdrh-meet-reg…
Nothing good comes from DARPA
Technofog had a link to some declassified texts on the dossier/Alfabank matter, and it turns out some of that was being run over (physically) to a guy named Tejas at DARPA in N. Va.
The plot thickens.
I’m so reassured there was/is/were nothing going on in the Taxpayer funded BioLabs in Ukraine, than Bio weapon research???🤡🤡🤡🤡
…do you mean like someone’s learned, and remembers the example of the ( non) transparency of some wuhan lab, somewhere,
not doing whatever research
( funded by gues$ whom? taxpayer$….)
as something ( virus ) spread … )?
Was that ‘offensive’, or ‘defensive’?
Does that word matter or is that just some lingo fodder for lawyer$ to bill the taxpayer$ some more, and more…for years of obfuscation…?
I do not know
Someone’s use of public purse strings / wallets are seeing the ( selfish, greed ) value$
while having lost the virtues and consideration of the contributors ( taxpayers) …
Imho
Come on man …. VAXX-aids isn’t gonna weaponize itself !
Are there secret US labs working to cure alzheimers? Parkinsons? Cancers?
Didn’t think so.
It’s mind boggling to think what the Us could really achieve if this money were put to good use in science and not evil.. mind boggling!
Do a quick search for people who were inconvenient to TPTB who died of or had a spouse who became ill with cancer (like Roger Stone’s wife or Ron DeSantis’s wife, or Eleanor Mondale)
Do another for people who got cancer but recovered, like Larry Hogan, Arlen Specter, and Ruth Bader Ginsberg (who as an individual might be the world record holder for types of cancer survived).
Ask yourself: What are the chances that the scientific community has known for a very long time how to induce cancer in a human being?
Now ask: if they can create it, and if favorites seem to survive it, what are the odds that cures exist but Big Pharma makes too much $$ and are too life prolonging i the opinions of the Zeke Emmanuels of the world so they’ve been suppressed?
I firmly believe Big Pharma has had a cure for most cancers for over 30 years…..they do not use it because it is far more profitable to treat it than cure it….so what if you lose some patients along the way….in the end, the bottom line IS enhanced
I firmly believe it’s the excessive chemo that kills people
Chemo toxicity. Yes. One of the chemo drugs used for breast and colon cancers is mustard gas. Let that sink in a bit…
B-17. Another cancer researcher said many cancers are caused by parasites and she was tormented by the government since the early 90’s. I found it interesting that Invermectin kills parasites and that was an effective Covid treatment banned/suppressed by CFR government. Coincidence?
You can also use fenbendazole or menbendazole to cure cancer.
Having had cancer, I will say it’s so virulent that more than one method is advisable and probably necessary.
There are lots of ways of curing cancer, but they don’t want you to know about it because that cuts into big-pharma’s profits–it’s all about the $$$. The business model is perpetual sickness for perpetual profit–they can’t get rich off of cures. See G. Edward Griffin’s book “World Without Cancer” about Vitamin B17 (laetrile)–you can also probably find a video with him doing a presentation on this. And Ty Bollinger has a book on alternative cancer treatments “Cancer: Step Outside the Box.” The Gerson method has also been curing people.
Researcher Dave McGowan got fast acting cancer after his work exposing the Boston marathon bombing on John B Wells Caravan to Midnight show. His site is here: https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/
Cure For all Cancers Hulda Clark. Cancers caused by parasites
Ruth Buzzy Ginsburg should have donated her body, not to science but to science fiction. For an elderly woman to have survived all the cancers and other maladies that accompany old age, it wasn’t a miracle or even medical science that kept her alive, it was something out of science fiction. If Ruth Buzzy Ginsburg had been Jane Smith, from say, Iowa, Jane Smith would have passed away years and years ago.
One of the best researchers died suddenly from cancer and he was only in his mid 50’s. Cancer zap?
read the book, Dr. Marys Monkey, by Edward T. Haslam. there is a virulent cancer — since 1960s
Add Carter’s brain cancer to the list of survivors. Metastatic melanoma in the brain at age 84. Quite an incredible story of survival there.
There is always reason to question and wonder aloud. However, I am a nobody stage 4 survivor of over seven years who was given only a 30% chance of living past five years. I have a dear friend who was diagnosed with multiple myeloma. Not supposed to be here. Instead he is a specimen of physical health and activity running the beaches of Ft Myers, FL.
I only point this out to say, I, like you, often wonder if elite’s receive better healthcare than the rest of us. While I suspect the answer is a resounding yes, there are also so many stories of survival among common folks that I sometimes wonder if maybe the medical profession as a whole knows less than we all hope they do.
They probably know much more about what causes (induces) cancer than they do about curing it. However, they have made great progress in saving people, albeit, normally with what remain barbaric treatments.
Fascinating.
In the end I know nothing more about the topic than you or any other. My comments are strictly guess work too. Maybe the good Lord knows but I certainly don’t.
Maybe up front in case an UN inspector shows up.
Real work is done in the sub-basement.
fwiw- I read a lot of Dr. Sherry Rogers’ books, and she’s repeatedly noted that they know how to induce Parkinsons (Parkinsons like symptoms) in the lab with pesticides. She has a book Detoxify or Die that makes a strong case that all sickness/disease is due to toxicity and nutrient deficiencies. Lots of info at whale dot to
http://whale.to/a/cancer_c.html
http://whale.to/a/alzheimer.html
Exactly what is a DEFENSIVE bio weapon?
Exactly how would it work?
The exact same question could be asked about nukes.
Just asking….
I think those are the ones they use in the false flag events. They claim they aren’t ours but it gives them the opportunity to pretend any supposedly defense use of their bio weapons is justified.
Wing of bat, hair of newt, add the Hunter, our nation’s kaput….
Soooo Jamie Lee Curtis is the Assistant Secretary of Defense eh?
LOL. Well, in all fairness to Jamie Lee Curtis at least she’s attractive and talented, which is more than I can say for Debbie Rosenblum.
have you seen a recent pic of Jaimie Lee Curtis? Attractive is not the word. Masculine comes to mind.
not offensive = deadly viruses are needed to make ‘defensive weapons’vaccines …
same as saying we had a lot of deadly viruses.
Purpose and Intent: to turn public relations into killing, changing minds without them knowing
No “offensive” biologic agents?
Am I supposed to take that statement at face value when those technologies like many others are inherently dual use and can be weaponized on a whim starting from otherwise benevolent reasons?
Besides, we know the US government developed biological weapons for potential use against the Soviet Union by virtue of targeting their food supply with zoological viruses and the like.
I find them offensive.
I would agree.
In consideration of past behaviors and the contexts involved with current biological research efforts at those labs, it is implicit to me.
The research is with a near certainty, intended for offensive purposes at some point.
Just remember that biological weapons need not be directly lethal, to be harmful.
Reminds me coincidently of part of the plot of Dan Brown’s Inferno.
Coming on the heels of a global PLANdemic with transhumanism underpinnings, I find it impossible to take it’s statement at face value.
This is the Cuban missile crisis all over again. Only this time we are the initiators. The Russians tried to put missiles into Cuba. JFK said no. We built many bio weapons “labs” along the Ukraine / Russian border. Putin is saying no more.
Velensky is a US proxy that has bought protection by providing high paying jobs to the sons of Biden, Pelosi, Kerry and Romney. And those are the ones we know about. We allocated money because to deny money could trigger exposure of the whole cabal.
In the meantime, it’s $5 gal / gas and everything costs a lot more than just a year ago. I sincerely hope they get hammered at the ballot box.
MAYBE $1/gal is because of Ukraine the rest is ALL on Slo Joe
I seem to recall that we actually first tried to place missiles in Europe, aimed eastward and the Russkies responded with the Cuban missiles.
Kennedy quietly agreed to remove our missiles and they would remove theirs.
The cult of Camelot then declared victory.
^^ This ^^ This ^^ This ^^
If I could, I would give you one million likes for your comment.
Why in God’s name should I believe anything this administration’s Pentagon says?
Dr. Robert Malone MD , said he worked for the Defense Threat Reduction Agency.
So if he found ways to reduce bio-weapon effectiveness lets say , I can see the real bad guys saying ” Ah-Ha .. the weak link , now we can ‘improve’ it to make it even worse.”
Soooooo,
Are we ever going to find any secret labs to stop:
– child trafficking
or
– pee dough freaks
and if we do,
🤔
Will they be defensive.
RFK, Jr., from 3/11/21:
In October 2019, shortly before the COVID outbreak, Gates and other powerful individuals began planning how to censor vaccine safety advocates from social media during a table-top simulation of a worldwide pandemic, known as Event 201.
“Over the last two weeks, Facebook and other social media sites have deplatformed me and many other critics of regulatory corruption and authoritarian public health policies. So, here is some fodder for those of you who have the eerie sense that the government/industry pandemic response feels like it was planned — even before there was a pandemic.
This document shows that a cabal of powerful individuals did indeed begin planning the mass eviction of vaccine skeptics from social media in October 2019, a week or two before COVID began circulating. That month, Microsoft founder Bill Gates organized an exercise of four “table-top” simulations of a worldwide coronavirus pandemic with other high-ranking “Deep State” panjandrums. The exercise was referred to as Event 201.
Gates’ co-conspirators included representatives from the World Bank, the World Economic Forum (Great Reset), Bloomberg/Johns Hopkins University Populations Center, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, various media powerhouses, the Chinese government, a former Central Intelligence Agency/National Security Agency director (there is no such thing as a former CIA officer), vaccine maker Johnson & Johnson, the finance and biosecurity industries and Edelman, the world’s leading corporate PR firm.
At Gates’ direction, these eminences role-played members of a Pandemic Control Council, wargaming government strategies for controlling the pandemic, the narrative and the population. Needless to say, there was little talk of building immune systems, off-the-shelf remedies or off-patent therapeutic drugs and vitamins, but lots of chatter about promoting uptake of new patentable antiviral drugs and vaccines. But the participants primarily focused on planning industry-centric, fear-mongering, police-state strategies for managing an imaginary global coronavirus contagion culminating in mass censorship of social media.
Oddly, Gates now claims that the simulation didn’t occur. On April 12, 2020, Gates told BBC, “Now here we are. We didn’t simulate this, we didn’t practice, so both the health policies and economic policies, we find ourselves in uncharted territory.”
Unfortunately for that whopper, the videos of the event are still available across the internet. They show that Gates and team did indeed simulate health and economic policies. It’s hard to swallow that Gates has forgotten.
Gates’s Event 201 simulated COVID epidemic caused 65 million deaths at the 18-month endpoint and global economic collapse lasting up to a decade. Compared to the Gates simulation, therefore, the actual COVID-19 crisis is a bit of a dud, having imposed a mere 2.5 million deaths “attributed to COVID” over the past 13 months.
The deaths “attributed to COVID” in the real-life situation are highly questionable, and must be seen in the context of a global population of 7.8 billion, with about 59 million deaths expected annually. The predictions of decade-long economic collapse will probably prove more accurate — but only because of the draconian lockdown promoted by Gates.
Gates’ Event 201 script imagines vast anti-vaccine riots triggered by internet posts. The universal and single-minded presumption among its participants was that such a crisis would prove an opportunity of convenience to promote new vaccines, and tighten controls by a surveillance and censorship state.
Segment four of the script — on manipulation and control of public opinion — is most revealing. It uncannily predicted democracy’s current crisis …
Read this transcript to see how Gates and his government, pharma and intelligence apparatus telegraphed their plans to censor and control the media during the pandemic. In yet another uncanny coincidence, COVID-19 began circulating among global populations within days of Gates’ meeting.”……. Read it all:
Before COVID, Gates Planned Social Media Censorship of Vaccine Safety Advocates
With Pharma, CDC, Media, China and CIA • Children’s Health Defense
They’re lying about Ukraine, too.
Then in April 3 , 2020 wall st journal , Ol’ Henry Kissinger communicated in an op-ed to the club that they should be ready with a ” parallel enterprise ” to maintain world order , post Covid.
Covid ends – Ukraine begins ?
The Coronavirus Pandemic Will Forever Alter the World Order | Henry A. Kissinger
“The U.S. administration has done a solid job in avoiding immediate catastrophe. The ultimate test will be whether the virus’s spread can be arrested and then reversed in a manner and at a scale that maintains public confidence in Americans’ ability to govern themselves. The crisis effort, however vast and necessary, must not crowd out the urgent task of launching a parallel enterprise for the transition to the post-coronavirus order.
Leaders are dealing with the crisis on a largely national basis, but the virus’s society-dissolving effects do not recognize borders. While the assault on human health will—hopefully—be temporary, the political and economic upheaval it has unleashed could last for generations. No country, not even the U.S., can in a purely national effort overcome the virus. Addressing the necessities of the moment must ultimately be coupled with a global collaborative vision and program. If we cannot do both in tandem, we will face the worst of each.”
Meh. Kissinger can’t face the truth–this was a Bio-Weapon attack on America and the world by our own Political Class, our Deep State and their Chinese boyfriends.
And now, all the carnage he feared is Occupation Government policy.
Can’t believe Gates is lying about Event 201 now. Is it arrogance or fear that would make him deny provable reality?
Hell, I think I might have even printed the write up out and passed it around in January 2020. Now it officially didn’t happen?
Reality War on steroids.
The same Biden dept of defense that altered the risks of the fake vaxes? They lost their credibility, long ago!
It’s a sad day when we get more truth from Russia then our own government
When it is said that there is no offensive biological weapons in these labs, are we to infer that these are strictly defensive biological weapons then? How do you differentiate between offensive and defensive in terms of use? It seems to me that this is purposely obfuscating rather than making it clear that there are no biological weapons. If it were the case that these are not weaponized why the need to input the word offensive?
In terms of the difference between offense and defense, it is the user who determines the viewpoint, is it not? Should the US have biological weapons, they can claim that their use was defensive, even though it is a weapon used to kill those in opposition.
Looking at Fauci and his work, how could anyone trust that the evil SOB wouldn’t work on developing biological weapons, and that the Military wouldn’t see those very pathogens as worthwhile weapons against an enemy force? Treaties, ethics, those things sure don’t seem to go hand in hand with what these people have engaged in using various countries to spread their work. Gain of function viruses and pathogens are not done for finding cures, they are done to make these things more deadly, more contagious, possibly targeted through DNA typing, for use as a weapon.
Designer germs ? that target – Deplorables , Nationalists & bitter clingers ( Klingons )
Uh-huh. “Defensive” like the way the government was just defending the country from a suspected “Russian agent” who was about to become president so they spied on his entire life. That’s what passes as defensive for these vermin.
The use the same word play when it comes to guns.
The federal government solicits bids for fully automatic weapons for their law enforcement agencies, calling them “personal defense” weapons, but when you or I want to buy a semiautomatic version of a similar gun they call it an “assault” weapon.
Offensive and defensive depends on the intent of the user.
“If Russia was investing in biological weapons labs in Mexico, and if the Russian military was working inside those labs along with Mexican government officials, I suspect the United States would conduct a special military operation in Mexico to remove that threat.”
No, our corrupt politicians would find a way to exploit it.
One caveat, they would destroy it *if* they could not exploit or control it in some fashion in furtherance of their own selfish goals.
If it cannot serve their goals, it has no right to exist. Ironically, this seems to be an accurate distillation of their Fabian Socialist ideology.
There are Chinese fentanyl operations in Mexico which kill thousands of Americans. The Big Guy is protecting them.
Hunter Biden might even be financing them.
If I was a resident of Washington, DC and the Russians come down Pennsylvania Avenue I would feel so safe with Joey BagofBS releasing the “defensive” bio weapons.
I refer to FJB as the Senile Demented Vegetable but Joey BagofBS is both accurate and humorous.
Funny, I’ve been saying for a while that my guns are defensive.
Those strong winds you hear outside tonight are just more credibility of our government being blown away! Their words, even sworn testimony means very little any more.
“I can say to you unequivocally there are no offensive biologic weapons in the Ukraine laboratories that the United States has been involved with.”
Well holy shit problem solved
Russia, like its USSR predecessor, operates the world’s most widespread and sophisticated programs to develope both chemical and biological weapons.
If anyone in this illegitimate administration says anything. Rest assured, it will always be a lie. They are incapable of being honest, because they only speak, when trying to cover up some illegal activity.
fact checking them is so easy these days
even a caveman could do it!
So far putin has more credibility than corn pops menace and his ministry of propaganda.
….and the vaccines are trash along with everything that fraud fauxsee has said.
Oh, and the 2020 election was stolen from the rightful president Trump.
Thats three domestic terrorist strikes against me, so come get me DHS myjokeass
I never heard of a Defensive Biologic Weapon.
Another lie exposed. Just like the pretend defensive use of chemicals coming up.
Im now convinced the US created Covid not the Chinese.
No country claims to have offensive bioweapons
There is no such thing as a defensive NBC weapon period. To be defensive you would by definition need to use them in proximity to your own troops. No one would do this.
Excuse me… but what is the biological difference between a “defensive” biological weapon and the same biological “offensive” biological weapon?
I dunno. I’m not a biologist. But I am offended.
Just defensive Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever.
So the only biological weapons in Ukraine are defensive ones? What the heck does that mean?
At the end of the day nothing really matters because absolutely nothing is going to happen to anybody no matter what the purpose. One thing our government doesn’t have is any accountability.
LOL! Spoken like they think we believe them.
If there are NO offensive biological weapons in that lab then WHY are they worried about the Russians getting their hands on them? I remember they were trying to scare us about possible casualties if the lab material got into the hands of the Russians.
So, basically, it’s beyond dispute that these twenty-some facilities were working on “weapons”…funded by the USDOD, staffed by US and Ukraine personnel…bordering Russia?
…and they’re calling Putin all kinds of names?!
Then what’s the big deal if Russia were to get them?
I mean….wasn’t that a big concern lately?
These people think we are stupid.
They tell so many lies ..they can’t keep them straight.
Besides…isn’t the rest of the World looking into this matter? Wanting answers also?
Purpose and intent……
That is the question…that is the difference…
President Truman created the CIA. But in the 1970s, he told his biographer, Merle Miller:
I think [creation of the CIA] was a mistake. And if I’d known what was going to happen, I never would have done it.
Why, they’ve got an organization over there in Virginia now that is practically the equal of the Pentagon in many ways. And I think I’ve told you, one Pentagon is one too many.
So, basically Ms. Rosenbaum was saying that the United States was researching, manufacturing and storing DEFENSIVE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS in Ukraine? Did any Republicans question her on that admission!
I don’t believe anything our corrupt government says anymore. Just like Fauci lied about gain of function these people are lying through their teeth.
Our government is knee deep in Biolabs everywhere. They say to prevent pandemics…and to that I say bullshit. We just had one that killed millions worldwide.
There is definitely a Biden/Ukraine component to all this. Hunter’s company was heavily involved and the DoD emails to prove it were on his laptop from hell.
Yeah. Sure Debbie. Gotcha.
As though I’m going to believe this lying, pos, government scumbag. I wouldn’t let Debbie water my houseplants let alone pay any attention to anything she has too say.
Simply put, Screw You Debbie and all the rest of your fellow travelers.
P.S. I won’t, but some people might take you more seriously if you didn’t look like a 65 year old man.
“The United States … has invested approximately [b]$200 million[/b] in Ukraine since 2005, supporting 46 Ukrainian laboratories, health facilities, and diagnostic sites.”
——
So, an easy $20 million then for The Big Guy.
Are the health facilities and diagnostic sites offensive or defensive?
Is Covid-19 offensive or defensive?