As you read the news reports on a new anti-viral pill to battle COVID-19 from Merck called “Molnupiravir”, keep in mind Merck is the pharma company that owns the anti-viral pill Ivermectin.
Oct 1 (Reuters) – Positive clinical trial results for Merck & Co’s (MRK.N) experimental antiviral COVID-19 pill reverberated through the healthcare sector on Friday, sending the drugmaker’s stock price soaring while denting high-flying shares of vaccine companies and makers of other coronavirus therapies.
Merck shares jumped as much as 12.3% and hit their highest level since February 2020 after data showed the company’s pill molnupiravir could halve the chances of dying or being hospitalized for those most at risk of contracting severe COVID-19. Experts hailed the news as potentially a huge advance in the fight against COVID-19.
[…] “We see molnupiravir, with its oral format as a clear game changer that is likely to meaningfully impact not just the treatment paradigm for COVID-19 but also has potential utility in the prevention setting,” Piper Sandler analyst Christopher Raymond said in a research note.
Merck is conducting a late-stage trial to see if its antiviral pill can prevent COVID-19 infection, in addition to the study that showed it can significantly cut hospitalization and death in those already infected. (read more)
Suspicious cat remains, well, suspicious…
All they talk about is who is losing money and how much Merck’s shares have risen. However, on this new pill, nowhere do we read of its ingredients. What the H is in it???
Hubby told me last night, his corporation is going to dock his pay $50/check for not having the poison shot. He has a Rx that he cannot tolerate vaccines, but intrusion on personal medical info, is spite of HIPPA, has no bearing. Can anyone bring a class action suit against this madness???
This is not a vaccine, its a prophylactic/therapeutic.
It may be similar to Ivermectin, but more expensive.
Then again, the “vaccine”, isn’t really even a vaccine…
It is now that they have changed the definition of vaccine plus another variety of medical terms.
Yeah, but “death” by government sponsored inaction, is still the same.
And by changing the definition they have opened up what can be used as a vaccine. You can say you are vaccinated if you take anything. So get a blank vaccine card and put the supplements you take, like Quercetin and Green Tea Extract plus the lot number on the bottle and you are good. At least according to their new definition.
the 2012 covid vaccine studies on animals.
Said: – be careful going into human because the covid vaccine impacts the body’s microbial and parasite immune response pathway.
images of it below (we get 3 links) – Remove the word REMOVE for source
httpsREMOVE://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22536382/
This is SARS-1 not SARS-2 we are presently dealing with.
It is an oral antiviral, in this case, and (so far as I have been able to research in my clumsy way) its active ingredient does not seem to be structurally related to ivermectin. But I am not a medicinal chemist, so take that for what it’s worth.
Ivermectin is an anti-parasitic, and anti-inflammatory, and ANTI- VIRAL. It is all three and regardless of the exact formula, this “new” drug is a copy of ivermectin with a few other things thrown in that are probably available over the counter.
The two may do the same thing, but the chemical structures are no way similar to each other. They’re as different as daylight and dark. Saying it’s a “copy” is totally wrong.
Yes, they have to tweak it to make it patentable, and therefore more costly.
Different compound, same effect. Merck owns both. I would say they pulled this older compound out of the drawer, more than likely developed the same time as Ivermectin. They went with the one that was cheaper of the two to produce/ROI, Ivermectin.
Mike:
When it comes to small molecule development (traditional chemistry, rather than biologics), what you described is how it works. Pharma companies constantly mine their databases of existing chemical structures for something that might work.
Our best case scenario would be that it is similar to Ivermectin. Too many other possibilities.
Ivermectin is already known and is inexpensive. The new drug is likely ivermectin with some lipstick so that it can marketed as a new drug with a designer price tag. KA-CHING!
but WHY a PARASITE DRUG? – see images ABOVE.
The link above says it kills “intracellular parasites.”
I remember long, long ago in junior high school learning about the “parasites” we have throughout our body and how many of them are necessary for good health.
That has always freaked me out, but I’m good with them doing whatever God put them their to do — as long as they stay in their place.
I have no idea what the “new” strains of evil illness do to our bodies, but at this point I put nothing past the darkened hearts of minds of those who want to kill us all.
My thoughts exactly!
According to Merck’s website, the government already ordered 1.7 million doses at $700 per dose!
Some of Biden and Pelosi’s biggest donors are heavily invested in Merck and Pfizer stock.
One thing to note is historically a few of these people have been heavily short the companies, but recently went long. Normally in the past the shorts would pay off because they would have the FDA reject the drugs the companies produced, therefore causing sharp drops in the stock. Now with Biden and Pelosi throwing taxpayer dollars at the companies they have turned to Longs.
On the nose, Caleb. It may indeed be a reformulation of some drug that is similar or nearly identical to ivermectin.
When it comes to employers requiring vaccines, there’s a EEOC guidance document that I found informative; it is written to caution employers against certain actions like compensation, reprisals, medical history data collection, etc. Requiring vaccines puts an employer in a lot of legal jeopardy. The employer must follow ADA, and a genetic nondiscriminatory act, etc.
https://www.eeoc.gov/newsroom/eeoc-issues-updated-covid-19-technical-assistance
And here is a pretty comprehensive FAQ
https://www.eeoc.gov/wysk/what-you-should-know-about-covid-19-and-ada-rehabilitation-act-and-other-eeo-laws
Thanks very much for posting.
Recall the first law of politics: The rule makers can be the rule breakers.
And the Judge, Jury and decision maker.
Still- also recall the 2nd law of awakening.
Spreading the word oftens requires turning an ear to hear- which, in and of itself- turns a LOT of heads, to boot.
Does your husband’s corporation allow for medical exemptions to avoid the vaccine? If so, what does it take to get one?
We might not be able to sue Pfizer if the vaccine is harmful, but if your company mandates you get an experimental shot in order to be employed and the shot hurts you, can you sue the company?
I believe that when/if the FDA approved Comirnaty is available, which is isn’t now, Pfizer loses all their indemnification, and can be sued out the wazoo. Is this the reason it isn’t available while the punishing threatening mandates are being unconstitutionally pushed? I think that plays a huge part.
Pfizer probably has a vast supply of the original vaccine (the one they can’t be sued for) so they’ll likely be pushing that one as far as they can.
And once they get the old vaccine that they are not legally liable for, injected into a large percentage of the population, they can always blame THAT ONE for any vaccine injuries that follow. That is why everybody MUST get that first injection.
Even though it’s outdated vaccine and ineffective against new variants. Even though millions already enjoy natural immunity from prior infections. Even though 99 percent have no issues with Covid itself. Even though it’s neither safe nor effective.
All that matters is you must receive their poison death shot, and quickly!
Absolutely. And that is why they came up with this plan to trick you into ‘consenting’ to take their poison death shots.
The legal liability only kicks in when there is no choice in the matter. So they offer that “choice” in the form of an approved exemption.
Then they make you play “mother may I” to get the exemption approved. Most, however are too feint of heart to successfully navigate through that process.
And THAT is how they got millions of people to “voluntarily” submit to their injections.. so far.
There IS no hard and fast mandate. It is pure deception, all the way through.
There should be no limits to ‘exemptions’ from medical experiments, as coercion and retaliation is illegal and against the EUA protocols.
But since we allow them to pull this crap, the workplace “Karens” are all in on denying any exemptions filed. They will then parse terms and proclaim that only allergies to the vaccine ingredients are a valid medical exemption.
Of course, since there are a smorgasbord of experimental injections to choose from, they will always find one that does *not* contain the allergen you cite.
Stick with the religious exemption. The US Supreme Court would have to deny that one, as medical choice has a set precedent in Freedom of Religion.
And no, even that fake Pope cannot interfere with your personal connection to God or your deep, abiding faith in Him.
I’ll add that a lawyer’s hourly fee is a bit higher than a plumber’s — but is much cheaper than dying or losing your fertility.
If you’re in a difficult employment situation, get a lawyer on your side.
I think at some point they’re going to have to prove the unvaccinated are costing them more money. Of course you have the judicial system also willing to back these mandates so it’s hard to say. Lawyers don’t usually bring class action law suits unless there is a reasonable chance they would win
The company is not firing him, however, docking his pay. Could it be because they are required to weekly test for COVID? That would cost more money, even though it is proven that the vaccinated are super-spreaders as well. I think the mandate the Cheater-in-Chief gave was the jab OR weekly testing.
You could be right about that. They always leave an out, because that is also their out from accepting any liability. It’s only a mandate if you have NO alternatives. Weekly testing fits into that alternative.
Merck has the price structure in place already. The feds have signed contracts already. The options to buy more are already in place to the tune of $3.7 billion. Amazing, isn’t it, for a little pill that hasn’t even been authorized by the FDA. But their Ivermectin has, as we all know.
The cost to us? $700/10 pills. Who knows how much the price will increase in the future. Look at Epipens.
I believe the initial contract is for one million doses. Since the pill is to taken for five days and I believe twice a day, that translates into treating a population of 100,000.
By producing this expensive pill, the elite can protect themselves while clubbing the unwashed into taking the jab that ups their risk for the flu and then the government can step in and “save” them with the pill.
What a racket.
It is that. Bottom lines first and foremost.
It astounds me how many (private) employers are on board with this gov’t edict.. #RESIST
Er, kinda like having private employers collect income taxes for the IRS?
They are people with no spine, morals, or ethics. No gravitas
corporations…non people…share holder boards..less than human
This is my opinion and I am not a lawyer, but the PPACA (Patiet Protection and Affordable Care Act), aka ObamaCare, is a also a HEALTHCARE LAW. You are supposed to have protected rights within it, one of which is the much touted:
*Requires insurance plans to cover people with pre-existing health conditions, including pregnancy, without charging more.
https://www.healthcare.gov/health-care-law-protections/rights-and-protections
Now, I do not know if you have insurance thru your husband’s employer, or if that even matters (this should be about your rights, insurance or not), but charging extra for ALLEGED “healthcare” is specifically NOT ALLOWED. This, to me, is charging extra for “healthcare”, whether it is thru your employer or an insurance company.
Also, it states:
*Provides free preventive care.
Well, your employer is allegedly charging you for “preventative care” that they took it upon themselves, I am assuming they are not medically trained, again if that even makes a difference, to impose. Whether it is inside or outside of an insurance plan should not matter.
AND, what is real preventative care for the China Bio-Terrorism Virus? HCQ, Ivermection, Numotizine, etc… Are these even being offered? And if not, that would seem to be a violation of the PPACA law.
It also says:
*Protects you from employer retaliation
An employer cannot take an adverse action against employees, such as: firing or laying off, demoting, denying overtime or promotion, or reducing pay or hours, for engaging in activities protected by OSHA’s whistleblower laws.”
https://www.whistleblowers.gov
This was supposed to be about patient rights and patient protection and patient centered outcomes, and yet we are all being forced into a one-size fits all mandate and being penalized if you do not go along with their b.s. that is not medically sound in any way, shape or fashion.
There is no medical reason for testing just because they say so, and allegedly preventative care is supposed to be FREE.
Under additional rights and benefits, it says:
*You have the right to appeal a health plan decision.
https://www.healthcare.gov/appeal-insurance-company-decision
They are imposing a health plan decision upon you whether it is through insurance or not. You are the patient. Where is your appeals process? AND, as you stated, where is the privacy allegedly afforded by HIPAA? WHY are they being allowed to trample upon your rights and freedoms?
It may sound like a stretch, but I think the PPACA and HIPAA are worthless if they do not protect the patient. And the patient is any human being, YOU and YOUR HUSBAND. ALL of us are the patients and we are all being DEMONIZED for OUR personal health care decisions.
I believe this is so against the law, but I am not an attorney.
I would suggest that a class action suit should come from all employees. I would also suggest filing a complaint with your state AG against your employer and file a complaint with OSHA. Throw sand in the gears.
This is a hostile work environment, all over the flu. A man-made evil flu, made by our very own gubt and China’s. And they want you to inject that virus into your system when it is known to kill, and maim, and more. And things we don’t even know about that they have hidden from us. When have they ever done this for the flu?
There is plenty of data and facts and laws and rights behind the decisions we are making to NOT COMPLY.
This, to me, is just like the ObamaCare mandate that you must pay if you don’t take their crappy healthcare insurance. They had to force you to take it. They are doing the same thing here, and it is wrong.
You also have a right to choose your own doctor, or so they said. Your employer is not acting as your doctor. Where is the 2nd opinion, the medical one?
AND, I do not believe they can withhold unemployment over your healthcare choices either. I think that is another b.s. myth that is just waiting to be knocked over. Your employer paid into this fund during the entire longevity of your employment. And then they changed the rules based on nothing. No laws changed. Nothing. To deny you that is unenforceable in my opinion and I would fight it to the Supreme Court if necessary.
Two-Laine, these are all great points!!
And I’m no lawyer either, but the way you’ve connected the supposed protections of these healthcare laws to the applicable points of the mandates makes quite logical sense to me.
Grazie mille.
A good friend will be “fired” from his job of 20 years with a federal agency because he will not take the shots.
We will see and hear of many more people that this happens to.
Doesn’t make it any easier for you and your husband.
Welcome to the cull.
The threat of firing, alone, is sufficient to trick millions into getting a poison death shot. I know a lot of students and workers under threat. However, I do not know a single one who was actually terminated. Not even one.
The threat of firing? Why, people get fired all the time. Go find a new career, or start your own Business and don’t provide service to commies, or their supporters.
People are *threatened* with firing if they don’t take the poison death shot. That doesn’t mean they will actually get fired. There’s a difference.
Take the exemption. Companies and schools are legally bound to offer one, because all of the injections in use today are experimental. *Consent* is what’s mandatory.
If you people are just now figuring out Democrats and their Unions are the enemies of our livelihoods, not sure what to tell you. You people are just now going through what many of us already have under Obama. Obama started this BS, messing with our incomes and careers. Biden is just following his orders. You have to insulate yourself from these people, or they will ruin your life. All I can say is “Wake the F*ck Up”
What’s in it is something they dug out of old laboratory notebooks that is not covered by the now expired Ivermectin patents.
It is also likely to be something that Merck passed on commercializing 20 years ago because they found Ivermectin to be much more effective.
Senator Ron Johnson is in the process of putting a bill forward that would allow us to sue these employers related to these vaccines. Sue for damages if injured along with other privacy issues.
The D-rats will shoot it down. NOT ONE D-rat will vote for it.
Fxxk Congress and their damn bills.
There is nothing in the constitution about bankrupting small businesses, confiscating work , violating worship, mandating a jab or tolerating tyranny.
When Ron Johnson brings a Thing that goes up to his work and clears the chamber then I’ll be impressed with his leadership.
To sue you first must have legal standing. To have legal standing, you must at least prove damages.
If you fall on your sword and take their poison death shot, winning a lawsuit is small consolation while your very life hangs in the balance.
How much is your life worth?
To prove damages without taking a poison death shot, you must be fired at minimum. Nobody I know was fired. Some may have quit in protest, others may have signed ‘voluntary termination’ papers.
But nobody has been officially “fired.”
This type of medicine is going to wipe us all o eventually. Even Wikipedia agrees:
Truth. Read page one for more details.
Yep and they now have an express line. JUST SAY NO
Just for fun I went and had a peak at the molecular structure and it’s basically a slightly altered version of the standard thymine side group of DNA with a truncated phosopho backbone. So yeah. i could see it being one of those drugs that inserts inself into the rapidly replicating infected cell and stopping the infection. Of course it could also be incorporated into normal cells but because they have much slower replication or if they are terminally differentiated (like brain or heart cells that can’t heal) they would not be affected. Sort of like chemotherapy drugs. I wonder if this one will make you lose your hair?
Thanks for doing that. My “barely passed high school chemistry” skills are being sorely taxed.
Seems there has been some concern about the mutagenic properties.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41594-021-00657-8
Another question I had…
Looking at the clinical trial results which indicate the drug performed 50% better than a placebo, why is this any better than the cheaper, equally or better performing Ivermectin, which has a proven safety profile and is readily available if the govt gets out of the way?
Justin Burch, Where did you find the “structure” ? Please provide a link. Thxs
“medicine” is now the Enemy Of The People
People are developing a fear of DR
Isn’t that the truth? I wasn’t a frequent visitor of the clinic anyway, but now I don’t even want to get my yearly physical exam.
Not getting my Flu shot this year either. Who the hell knows what they will put into that shot.
Or you will “inadvertently” be given the clot shot, as we have repeatedly seen.
So sorry
Exactly. I never used to read all those “possible side effects” warnings.
Now, I realize those side effects are listed to protect the company, not me.
They are listed so they can say I consented to the risk.
They are listed because these treatments CAUSE those side effects.
I know two women who died from stroke in their early forties. They both ate contraception pills without a break from their teens. I guess they skipped over the part that warned about strokes, not believing such a long term effect would happen to them.
Yearly physical exams . . . probably NOT a good idea.
Many people are FALSELY diagnosed as having cancer. Then given chemotherapy and “cured” of something they never had. But it brings in good profits to the hospital.
“Positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET-CT) scans with [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and PET–magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have become standard practice in staging and restaging of colorectal cancer patients by providing important information about the primary cancer as well as metastases,” the authors wrote. “However, not all PET-positive lesions are cancer, and in many instances, PET findings can be false positive.”
“There are many false-positive causes of FDG uptake,” the authors conclude. “The pattern of FDG uptake is easily identifiable as benign or malignant, especially if this is confirmed by CT or MRI findings. However, there are still a considerable number of challenging PET findings that may lead to false interpretation with subsequent inappropriate treatment decisions. ”
In other words, many people have been treated for colon cancer who never had it.
Visit to the md is more like police interrogation and $$$ shakedown than anything to do with your health.
My experience is that the mds are there to scold you for a variety of things and be mad at you for having any kind of sickness or pain. It’s your damned fault and don’t expect them to help you.
Oh are you vaccinated why not you should we can do that today. Don’t do drugs but these nasty drugs here these are ok bc they make us money.
Pay up when you leave then gtfo.
Two thirds of the time is devoted to filling out government mandated questionnaires. Gotta check those boxes before we do the medical part.
People should fear doctors.
Death from medical malpractice is a giant risk in the United States.
My surgeon friend tells me that people regularly die on the operating table due to negligence that everyone in the operating room covers up.
I have personally been injured by an unnecessary and intrusive medical test that should have never been given to me.
Doctors are the kind of people who are very diligent at studying. They are oversocialized. They trust anything they read in a book. If their medical book says, “The treatment is lobotomy.” Then they give you a lobotomy.
Pharmaceuticals always have been!
Does Anthony F. Mengele own stock in Merck? If not, it will never see the light of day. If yes, count on it to kill patients or not work.
I’ve never been one to try brand-new concoctions. I’ll stick with the one with the seventy year safety record, thank you very much.
That would be the IVERMECTIN.
How can a drug first sold in the 1987 have a 70 year use life?
https://www.acs.org/content/dam/acsorg/education/whatischemistry/landmarks/discovery-of-ivermectin-mectizan.pdf
You are right about IVM. I believe the poster may be referring to HCQ.
Ivermectin was first discovered as an antibacterial agent by a microbiologist at Tokyo’s Kitasako Institute, and sent to Merck research labs in the 1960’s.
My primary refuses to OK ivermectin. Compares it to the ongoing study of the use of rattle snake venom for cancer. But also claims he doesn’t recognize new procedures until they have matured 5 years.
bill johnston, You may want to consider finding another Primary Care MD. Seriously. Your Dr. may be making excuses, as state health agencies are cracking down on prescribers of Ivermectin accusing them of using it “off label”; and if so your Dr. is not sharing the truth.
Some 20% of prescriptions are for “off label” use. Why the problem.
That’s why we have telemedicine. Try AFLDS dot org. They are smarter and definitely more courageous than the average doctors out there.
Fauci and his compadres bought up all doses of remdesavir. You know the drug hospitals give Covid patients. This drug shuts down organs and you die. Wonder if Fauci gets two bites of the apple? Profit from the drug and a percentage of what the hospital gets when a patient dies with covid.
I refuse to ask for an exemption yet they beg me too at the same time the ones they don’t really need they deny their exemption I’m poor but they can still eat a dick
Paul: You don’t need to ask for an exemption. An exemption is yours for the taking. It’s the other way around: Your employer needs to ask you to get vaccinated, and you should just say, “No, I’m exempt.”
This “NEW” drug is actually NOT new…It has some of the same ingredients as —-IVERMECTIN…Imagine that!!!!!!
If I can:
https://iowaclimate.org/2021/10/01/why-merck-dissed-its-own-invention-ivermectin/
This story is one of MANY of merck dissing it own drug of ivermectin….1.3Billion DOLLARS…Yeah, I guess they did diss their own drug….
Careful, it may have similarities, but focus on the differences.
As outraged as we might be that a cheap and effective drug is being witheld so the manufacturer can slightly alter it, patent it and make huge profits, I can live with that. What concerns me much more is the possibility that whatever they are “adding” will harm us. That could prove to be something we can’t live with, literally.
I can’t live with the fact there was a whole campaign to smear a drug that works in a significant number of people and could’ve saved countless of lives. Also, think of the 48,000 people who died within 2 weeks of getting the jab. They would’ve never died had Ivermectin been push instead of tarnished so they could invent a new drug to charge more.
it’s ridiculous.
I probably expressed myself poorly. I was merely attempting to compare the lesser of the evils and not condoning the practices of withholding meds and likely causing deaths, but there is plenty of blame to go around for that. It all began at the Whitehouse podium.
I do my best to deal in reality. We are here at this point and if I had to choose between a copy, cost more version of Ivermectin or a copy and add harmful ingredients version, I will choose the former.
A significant difference if the new mereck drug is a close match to ivermectin is that it is a chemical vs the pfizer gene therapy shot. A world of difference. The mereck solution would eliminate the shedding problem for example.
“Close to a match” that is a whole lotta chemicals between close and exactly. You are much more trusting than I.
To some extent the rally has replaced the podium.
Ridiculous? Hardly. Deadly? Absolutely. My wife, perfectly healthy with no co-morbidities, died three weeks ago because the hospital withheld Ivermectin. In addition, they used only a few, approved antivirals which were totally ineffective in curbing the virus; they provided little or no treatment for the massive inflammation reaction in her lungs.
Bottom line. If it were not for US sponsored and paid for gain-of-function research done in China (to bypass a 1990’s Bioweapon treaty) overseen by Fauci, there would be NO COVID. Were alternative treatments made available many more would live. Our government is killing us; when do we address that?
Oh, no, I’m so sorry about the loss of your wife.
My deepest sympathies Jimmy. I regret to say that it is doubtful anyone will be held accountable for the intentional actions of our government officials, pharma and medical sectors. So many preventable deaths. There is not one person alive worthy of our respect or our votes who continues to remain silent on these mass murderers.
I am so very sorry Jimmy and pray for your comfort and healing.
I’m sorry for your loss.
So sorry to hear of your loss.
This is beyond horrible Jimmy! I am so very sorry for your loss.
On another note – you might want to explore bringing a malpractice lawsuit – because in my view, that’s essentially what this boils down to.
My condolences to you and your family. I am so sorry. My spouse was hospitalized in August and given Remdesivir, steroids, Lovenox, etc. We were not offered anything by the urgent care when we went to be tested or our PCP either, and we were symptomatic. The antibody treatment had to be ordered at that time, it was not easily available as it is now. He was in the hospital for two weeks and will be out of work for a couple more months they say. I did not know anyone last year who had Covid or died. In the last couple months, I know MANY people who have had Covid – two have died. I was vaxxed and still got sick. My spouse was not vaxxed, but he was hit hard due to comorbidities.
What? You don’t trust something backed by Bill Gates to be perfectly tested and approved before it is unleashed on unwitting users?
I am more than suspicious.
It appears we have now entered a “self checkout”, “express line” for drug development and marketing. Any drug not safely and adequately trialed, studied, adverse event reporting, data collected is a HUGE RISK.
This sounds like a prophylactic more than a therapeutic. NO THANKS
I have not read the study, so just reactions here, but cutting corners to rush to market was a dangerous door to open. Let the loons get the shots, pop the pills, wear the masks. Protect the children.
Is it really “rushing” if they’re using the Ivermectin backbone or concept to tweak it for a “new” drug?
I don’t they they are “rushing”, but I do believe they are being highly unethical as an early push for Ivermectin use could have saved so much of the disaster we are in right now from having occurred: Australian lock-down, fight over forced “vaccination”, global supply chain ruining many industries and livelihoods, not too mention the countless deaths and long-term side effects from the jab, unnecessary death and hospitalizations from Covid that could’ve been prevented, etc.
Don’t be distracted by outrage and emotion. I am speaking strictly to long established, practiced and enforced safe medical practice. The moment you let “thoughts” and biases into it, they got you. So it’s ok now if the formula is “close” to just put it on the market. Not in my book. This thinking is more dangerous than the left.
Yes, I admire Trump — but “operation warp speed” for new medications was a bad idea.
Now it’s being embraced by the pharmaceutical companies and their government lackeys (CDC, FDA).
Agree.
Eric, from what I’m gathering so far, it is not the same as ivermectin at all. It has more in common with Remdesivir.
Thank you Kaco.
It’s really not much like ivermectin at all.
Avoid hospitals, Remdesivir and ventilators. By now after almost two years your chances of dying from this flu are even more minuscule than at the beginning of this scamdemic. You more than likely have antibodies. Certainly avoid any new drug from Big Pharma.
100% on each point. My son warned about Remdesivir over a year ago. He knew that the docs knew it wasn’t working at best, causing harm at worst and were using it anyway.
No way am I taking anything new from anyone. Save the children.
Right!
Don’t tell ANYONE if you are feeling any kind of illness.
The hospital will try and kill you on purpose or by negligence whatever.
Wife’s company keeps sending mandatory vaccine response emails. We keep ignoring. Employers are legally forbidden to know about health issues per hippa and Obamacare.
Wife got a bad sore throat 2 days ago. We went with the C, D, zinc bromalain quecertain resveratrol dosage increases and she has hardly any symptoms today.
Who knows what it was?
You were smart to begin early treatment for the symptoms and forget about the testing, which is unreliable at best. Doctors who refuse to treat until you land in the hospital a week later, are guilty of malfeasance.
Treatment denied is what really kills people. Same thing would happen if people couldn’t get ahold of antibiotics for pneumonia, for example.
50%? Isn’t ivermectin better than that?
from what little I read, the main thing was ivermectin, used early, was very effective in slowing the progression of the virus. “Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. ” “Meta-analysis of 15 trials found that ivermectin reduced risk of death compared with no ivermectin (average risk ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.19–0.73; n = 2438; I2 = 49%; moderate-certainty evidence). This result was confirmed in a trial sequential analysis using the same DerSimonian–Laird method that underpinned the unadjusted analysis. This was also robust against a trial sequential analysis using the Biggerstaff–Tweedie method. Low-certainty evidence found that ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86% (95% confidence interval 79%–91%).”
Ivermectin’s efficacy as preventative is undeniable. That early on it keeps you from getting much sicker than without is also clear. Considering how affordable it is, with very few contraindications, it most decidedly was/is criminal to not make it widely available to anyone who wanted it.
Should be made easily obtainable in the US. Can be ordered from India and Mexico.
All day chemist dot com.
I’ve ordered it. Takes about 30 days for delivery.
I assume you still need someone to write a script such as the frontier doctors or whatever their name is.
I took the “horse Paste” when I got Covid and again for reducing lingering effects (so called Long-covid). Paste can be delivered next day!
My only side effect is a desire to eat oats and hay (LOL).
Problem was, to get an Emergency Use there has to be NO other drugs available.
Much. And it’s safe with virtually no side effects. I wouldn’t trust a new Covid drug at this point.
Somehow I think Merck is going to find away to “improve” this pill in the future, to the point it will look identical to Ivermectin.
But keeping the higher price tag.
Like putting a new hood ornament on a chevy and calling it a buick, with a price uplift to match.
You can bet this won’t be something you can take home and have a lab exam for ingredients. You’ll have to take it in front of your doctor or nurse and unless you tongue one and spit it in your hand after you’ve been cleared no one will be able to find out what’s in it.
This compound has some history. Revealed in a simple web search. Having retired from the drug biz, I already see some red flags in the early work done that’s available. Me thinks Suspicious Cat is on the right track remaining suspicious.
I have found the same. Certainly don ‘t have your scientific background, but I have been backtracking through some documents and red flags keep popping up.
MerckVerMectin since Ivermectin’s patent expired in 1996. Dipshit government folks are figuring out they are going to lose 50% 0f employees across the board with vax requirements. They are re-defining the word stupid and it is really getting old having to pay their guaranteed salaries and lifetime benefits.
I am about to become a certain age where I become “eligible” to enroll in Medicare. For that “priviledge”, I get to “contribute” to a medical system no longer slaving under the Hippocratic Oath.
I am leaning strongly at remaining outside this corrupt system. As I know I am going to die, the question is should I live independent of this system or risk becoming a victim by joining it?
I have pretty good visibility with family history. I know I will not be living my best life in a hospital.
And so, I am willing to absorb the risks entailed in life as our forefathers have for thousands of years.
When you’re in Medicare, and going to a doctor who takes Medicare patients, then your doctor CANNOT treat you with a treatment that Medicare doesn’t cover, even if this treatment would save your life.
Why should I believe that “clinical trials” have actually happened? These things take years. They never put their last potion to trials, either.
So, Merck wants to patent(!!) a slight variation of Ivermectin/Zinc. Surprised? ?♂️
With a whiff of HCQ and massive Vit D!!
If it’s little more than a reformulated Ivermectin then that proves to me they knew of Ivermectin’s antiviral properties from the very beginning of the pandemic! People died, including my wife’s cousin, while they fiddled with coming up with a new formulation that could be patented! It’s evil what was done!!! All of it!
I haven’t seen our source posted, so I’ll share. SevenCells.com offers I*mectin.
$25 doctors fee to review your answers to the medical questionnaire.
$165 for 20 capsules, with dosage according to your weight.
if you fill out the questionnaire, and leave the site, they’ll email you a 20% off coupon for the meds. (So, $132)
I ordered 9/15, just got tracking that it arrives on Monday. 3 weeks.
Priority Shipping is $18.55
Total $175.55 for20 capsules. Yes, expensive. I am just glad to be able to get them.
My cousin, a NursePractitioner with a Doctorate in Community Health, recommends alldaychemist.com.
2-4 weeks. Much less expensive.
You need a script to order.
Drat!
Not at sevencells .
I asked my cousin about alldaychemist…
”just skip the part that asks for provider name and address”
I just tried it, and you didn’t need the script.or Doctors info….. was not a “required field”.
I just left it blank and the order went through.
Alldaychemist.com
I ordered from them once years ago. My credit card was compromised right after making my order, so I never ordered from them again.
50%. Is that some kind of threshold that can’t be crossed without endangering the emergency authorization on their jab?
You got it!
A pill that only cuts in half the hospitalization should be very suspect because we know for a fact the cheap HCQ and Iver are much more effective.
Protease inhibitor.
Sounds alot like horse paste.
And mine came with apple flavor. Yum.
The key take away from this is —
THE USE OF GENE THERAPY AS A CURE FOR COVID WAS A CROCK FROM THE START.
By providing Mereck an EUA the CDC-FDA is by slight of hand proving that there were already drugs that could be use as a preventive measure. They did not take the preventive measures that could have saved lives and billions.
Calling Dr. Paul…. Put forth a bill in Congress authorizing a lifetime patent for the new drug so long as Mereck discloses its organic chemical composition and its similarity to Ivermectin. To know this is to expose a fraud worse than anything known.
Yes…..pick your poison!
I think I’ve read the book series that laid out where this all going. It starts with Wool by Hugh Howey.
https://hughhowey.com/books/wool/
So, based on reports, this drug is not at all like ivermectin, it screws with DNA and may lead to genetic mutations and only had a slight reduction in hospitalizations from Covid. Is this like Remdesivir in pill form?
This will be a hard NO.
This is what they give us? And our government has already pre-purchased 1.7 million doses at 1.2 billion dollars?
I can’t even.
Are they going to cut off Regeneron because it works too well with little side effects?
Incredibly transparent bait and switch from a cheap, generic drug used worldwide to a “new” drug that will cost a bundle and be selectively distributed…..they are evil incarnate
Got my breath of sanity for the day. Thanks to informed comments now time for the family. Cheers.
Three NIH studies find Ivermectin highly efficient treating Covid19. NIH is Fauci’s parent organization.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33592050/
Conclusion: Two-dose ivermectin prophylaxis at a dose of 300 μg/kg with a gap of 72 hours was associated with a 73% reduction of SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers for the following month. Chemoprophylaxis has relevance in the containment of pandemic.
—————-
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088823/
Conclusions:
Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.
——————–
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33795896/
Introduction: The low frequency of cases and deaths from the SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19 virus in some countries of Africa has called our attention about the unusual behavior of this disease. The ivermectin is considered a drug of choice for various parasitic and viral diseases and shown to have in vitro effects against SARS-CoV-2.
Conclusions: The incidence in mortality rates and number of cases is significantly lower among the APOC countries compared to non-APOC countries. That a mass public health preventive campaign against COVID-19 may have taken place, inadvertently, in some African countries with massive community ivermectin use is an attractive hypothesis.
For the historically challenged: “Frances Marion” was the revolutionary war hero – the Swamp Fox, on which the movie the Patriot was loosely based.
I suspect that Merck has been working on a isomer or analog of Ivermectin . The real benefit to me will be the change in conversation from ‘vaccines’. You can’t make Ivermectin go away and no one is saying any one single drug is the answer. It takes a protocol utilizing several drugs the core being Quercetin, Zinc, Vit D3, Vit C and corticosteroid. So Merck needs to address that in their studies. Maybe that’s why their Hosp/death results are 50% reduction and not 75%+.
Another dangerous nothing-burger, being driven by research “funding” and corporate greed. This one also has a fair bit of controversy. Just like the synthetic Frankenstein mRNA vaccines–in all of its many names and delivery methods. Do you really think they are picking the little “spike proteins” off of the actual SARS-CoVID-2 viruses?
The “real” vaccine is the Indian-made Covaxin. It is a “whole virion” inactivated vaccine for SARS-CoV-2. It is the same type of vaccine as Influenza vaccine–made by inactivating (or outright killing) the virus with solvents to absolutely ensure that virus cannot replicate at all. This inactivated/killed virus is then cleansed of the solvents, mixed with “helper” agents and the “vaccine” created. The actual virus is used in creating antibodies to fight against it. Imagine that…well, it seems someone doesn’t wanting us imagining anything.
So why has this not been given EUA authorization? The FDA “feels” (apparently) it has “enough” vaccines under EUA and “wants” this vaccine to undergo the standard authorization “procedure” (guaranteed to take years). At least that is the “official” FDA reason.
Unofficially, take your pick:
And on and on. Hanlon’s Razor (similar to Occam’s Razor) states that “never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity”. Are we to “believe” that this is all due to “sheer” Stupidity? Perhaps, some, but Suspicious Cat still remains suspicious…indeed.
Of course they couldn’t do something as simple as rebranding Ivermectin with minor or even moderate changes.
It sounds like this drug is another one to avoid. Leave it to Big Pharma to continually up the ante on evil.
Merck solution 40% effective at $700 ea
India solution 90% effective at $2.65 ea
India’s Covid Kit at $2.65 ea: Pulse Oximeter, Digital Thermometer, Paracetamol tablets (15) Vitamin C tablets (30) Multivitamin tablets with Zinc (30) Vitamin D3 tablets (2 packs) Ivermectin 12mg tablets (10) Doxycycline 100mg tablets (10) Three-ply face masks (5) N-95 Masks (2) Sanitizer (100ml) Alcohol based Wipes (1 box with 20 plies) Gloves (2 pairs)
India gave Uttar Pradesh’s 204 million people these kits and it nearly wiped out hospitalizations
Merck does not “own” Ivermectin. It is made by thousands of companies all over the world.
Was going to post the same thing. Ivermectin has been on the market for decades and has long since gone generic (e.g. off patent).
Yep, and as shown in the Dr. House video below, big pharma will then slightly modify it to allow it to be patented again!
And that, kids, is why ivermectin is so brutally attacked by your big pharma owned government with their lackey media going along.
This new “wonder drug” is nothing more than Ivermectin or HCQ and maybe, with zinc and vitamin D. Oh and a huge price tag. Gotta make the money.
0f course it is ivermectin, just a few changes, binder material and pill shape, and color, viola’ a new product to sell. The pill will sell itself.
Will be awesome if someone could get a hold of these pills and then do a lab test to see what is in it. President Trump will be right once again when they find out what is in this pill, like Ivermectin.
The problem with Ivermectin is that the price is well known. If Merck tried to charge the feds double or triple for it, then kick back half the difference to politicians, bureaucrats, and their friends and family, it would be easy to spot the corruption. They need something new to work with the money-laundering scheme, so the true cost of the drug can be buried, and the true size of the kickback slush fund can be concealed.
The problem with ivermectin is that it is off-patent and, therefore, there is very strong price competition.
Therefore, Merk must come up with something new that can be patented.
Lucifermectin?
Merk invented ivermectin, but since generics are available, it is off-patent, so they don’t “own” it. OOPS!
Dr. House describes what is then common for big pharma companies to do in that case – modify it slightly so it can be patented again. It also explains why cheap, effective ivermectin is brutally attacked.
Note that the House video linked below is cued to the right point, but for some reason isn’t showing up as an imbedded video. Clicking on it or right click along with “open in new tab” will take you to the video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0VIOQ4OpD8&t=92s
STRONG anecdotal evidence VERY early on in the pandemic: intelligent testimony about the amazing COVID-19 prophylaxis results among VERY elderly residents with many comorbidities at this nursing home in Canada due to the coincidental use of ivermectin for a scabies outbreak immediately before the pandemic hit. They were officially ignored and discouraged from speaking of it. A nursing home in France had the same coincidence with similar results [not mentioned in the video]:
Also:
American Journal of Therapeutics 28, e299–e318 (2021); 2021 Apr 22
Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34375047/
Also:
Collective overview and analysis of results of ivermectin studies
https://c19ivermectin.com/
And here, kids, is a description of your government and many of the agencies which are part of it. Language warning:
I read another report about the chemical makeup of this new medication, it was a different compound that worked identically to Ivermectin. It was more than likely down to the two meds at the time Merck created Ivermectin, and it boiled down to which one was cheaper to produce, which Ivermectin won. I am sure this “new” compound is not that “new”. Would I take it? Hell know, the label may say one thing, and God only knows what they put in this stuff. Big Pharma has already gone out of their way to murder folks with their vaccines, why would this be any different.
I’ve been wondering for a while if I have ‘long Covid’, but recently, it dawned on me that I may just be continually exposed to the virus, as I interact with more and more vaccinated people who are shedding the crap.
Take the Horse paste.
Very little info out yet but it seems to be an antiviral on the order of Tamiflu (oseltamivir) —which you must use within first 2-3 days of flu symptoms to minimize the case of flu. I always believed it was questionably effective….but that’s just me.
Ivermectin is different and actually works in multiple ways which is why it’s so effective in treating covid.
But the patent is long gone, it’s inexpensive and readily available (except here-but that seems by design)
I’m interested in seeing what the cost of a treatment pack on molnupiravir will be…..
Wait..just saw previous post, $700/10 pill pack. Wow. I think when tamiflu came out it was about $75/pack…..hmmmm.
Any questions?
It is either Ivermectin, or it is not. Ivermectin was discovered by a Japanese researcher, I believe on the outskirts of a golf course, in Japan. It has never been found anywhere else. (Tell me God isn’t at work here.) I read Merck owns Ivermectin. It would be ridiculous if it didn’t contain Ivermectin. It will be interesting to see how the government punishes Merck for coming out with this.
My understanding of the EUA is that it is only valid if there are “no other treatment options” available…. Would this medication mean that the “emergency” is over and the jabs will now have to be put back to the human trial phase, which would mean that they CANNOT be mandatory for anyone?
I guess it will depend on whether or not Merck out bids Pfizer when buying politicians and FDA regulators. Maybe this is part of the reason for the massive mandate push? Once this pill comes to market (December) then the Vax is no longer the “only” option?
It’s mutagenic.
That’s why Rick Bright was demoted. The strange part is that he’s now on-board with Biden and is silent on the issue.
Merck is a maker of Ivermectin, which is known to be highly effective against covid…but very inexpensive. Best guess is that this “new” pill is just a bottle of Ivermectin with a different label slapped on it along with a much higher price!
Slightly change the composition of Ivermectin and you can rebrand it as brand new. Then they can rape, pillage and plunder the sick people. Most Americans aren’t smart enough to realize they have been screwed because those we used to trust are the ones lying to us.
So when the Merck Ivermectin pill comes out, what do the Health Agencies tell the 2 Billion people who now have billions of spike proteins in them?
Oopsie?
Ivermectin patent issued 1981, owned by Merck and expired in 1996. Since generic drugs have low profit margins, the pharma mafia tampers with the chemical formula and submits as new product. DrugPatentWatch(.)com shows 7,276 applications for Ivermectin and 12 patents granted > This is Witchdoctors with magic medicine Voodoo.
Doctors have been added to my DO NOT TRUST list, along with politicians and other crooks.
Merck invented this, but it’s off-patent, so they must come up with something else to allow price gouging:
Compare the above with this. This would be in the “early treatment” category:
Merck and its partner Ridgeback Biotherapeutics said early results showed patients who received molnupiravir within five days of Covid symptoms had about a 50 percent reduction in the rate of hospitalization and death as patients who received a placebo pill.
There’s ALWAYS a lot of Merck – oops, murk- in the deep swamps.
Could be Ivermectin with just a new name to fool the dopes that don’t believe it’s effctive.