Earlier today President Obama pulled the progressive tribes together and told them to support West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin’s manipulative deflection/amendment. Manchin is trying to defend himself against West Virginia backlash by clouding the intent of Democrats to forever takeover federal and state elections. Democrats want to codify permanent “mail-in ballots” into federal law to ensure they can duplicate the 2020 election outcome forever.
Using professional political parseltongue “Manchin said Tuesday afternoon that he would vote with the rest of the Democratic caucus to advance the bill. “I’ve found common ground with my Democratic colleagues on a new version of the bill that ensures our elections are fair, accessible and secure,” Manchin said in a statement.”
The Democrats now have enough votes to begin advancing SB1, the full takeover of U.S. elections with Democrats in control over every rule and process. However, the Republican wing of the UniParty cannot give Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer 10 votes to overcome the filibuster without the GOP base knowing their intent. So McConnell has vowed to filibuster the bill.
Progressive leftists will want Chuck Schumer to get rid of the filibuster and use a simple majority vote in the Senate to pass the “Take Away The Right to Vote” legislation. However, if the Democrats fail in cheating on a massive scale in 2022, they could lose the Senate and House, and SB1 could be reversed and leave Biden to stand alone vetoing the bill to undo the election takeover.
It’s a calculating game of political scheme and fraud, where the DC elites (both parties) are trying to determine their odds of pulling off the plan while simultaneously keeping the American electorate from seeing what they are doing. Pelosi has the military defenses around the Capitol prepared to keep back any revolting peasants; but that security only works if the politicians don’t leave DC.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid famously sequestered the Senate in December of 2009 to block any senator from returning to his/her state where they would face the fury of their electorate and likely recant support for Obamacare. Unfortunately, Senate Majority Chuck Schumer doesn’t have the benefit of the calendar to jail the senators from leaving DC, and simultaneously tensions at home in every state are unseasonably hot.
[Via Politico] […] – Proponents of the bill argue that it’s a necessary response to recent state laws from GOP legislatures that restrict access to the ballot, where were introduced in the aftermath of the 2020 election. Democrats’ legislation would lead to significant changes in how elections are conducted across the country, including provisions to mandate in-person early voting in all states, require that states offer no-excuse absentee voting and institute automatic and same-day voter registration. It would also require that most states establish independent redistricting commissions.
The bill as written also contains sweeping campaign finance and ethics updates, like a public financing system for congressional races, which have often taken a back seat to the elections portions of the law.
The bill remains a potent motivating factor among much of the Democratic base. (more)
Less government now! Who in their right mind thinks that the elected and those appointed by the elected should be anywhere near elections? Each day with these criminals is an exercise in willful ignorance, arrogance and incompetence.
They must cement in fraud in order to retain power. Whatever they name the bill, the intent is always the opposite.
From your lips to His ears, Bert.
they thought to import friendly voters through the open border but the results in McAllen, TX showed them their failed agenda does not even attract “Hispanic” voters” so increased election fraud is in order to maintain their power
I mean i live in Florida we still have a good Governor go to The New American Website and fight
If it passes, won’t this be found to be unconstitutional?
Yes. SCOTUS already stated they lack the jurisdiction as federal judges to rule on how the states run their elections.
If SCROTUS lacks jurisdiction, so does Con-gress.
Do you expect SCOTUS to uphold the constitution?
I don’t.
Yes, and I expect them to rule unanimously. It is unconstitutional on its face, a no-brainer.
So was Texas’ lawsuit against Pennsylvania’s and three other state’s violation of Constitutionally protected voting rights.
But that didn’t stop SCOTUS from turning tail and running away from it under the thinly transparent faked guise of “lack of standing”
What we never seem to get clarification about from SCOTUS is – Exactly who DOES have “standing” to press this case?
especially when you consider that when states have disagreements the ONLY legal platform with jurisdiction under the US Constitution IS SCOTUS…let me repeat that ONLY SCOTUS has jurisdiction in state’s disagreements
Yes. That’s what one heck of a lot of legal experts thought.
No. They are part of the power structure and serve to ensure it continues. They are part of the enforcement arm. We should expect nothing from them.
No.
Which does NOT mean that it SHOULDN’T. Only that I have negative confidence in SCOTUS to decide issues like this according to the actual words of the Constitution.
Unconstitutional! Ha ha ha ha ha ha. Omg! Thanks I needed that.
The issue is moot once it happens, they will not stop it before it happens, and complainers will be charged as seditionists.
Off with their heads!!
The US Supreme Court has already very clearly demonstrated its role as a co-conspirator. And, as the sole and exclusive arbiter of what the Constitution actually contains.
Therefore, the Supreme Court simply “apportions unto itself” the right to amend the Constitution without amending it … just as it did when it gave itself the right to declare things to be “unconstitutional.” The Congressional obligation to Congress to “guarantee a republican form of government” now eliminates both the Elections Clause and the Electors Clause, and gives the Federal Government the exclusive right to determine its own membership.
“Okay, Chairman Xi, the coast is clear! 330.3 American Citizens are prepared to surrender their entire nation to you without you firing a shot! A list of our ‘secret’ Chinese bank accounts will follow this message . . .”
LOL. Let China try.
They already own/run us. We are the US of China. They know we will never accept a Chinese face in the WH so they install Joebama. They control us subtly.
We are paying for their military with interest on the debt.
We are also paying for our military.
I don’t think either seem to care about following the Constitution.
The sell-outs in the SCOTUS?? Surely you jest
“won’t this be found to be unconstitutional?”
By whom?
The Supreme Court? The same court that is 77% bought and paid for now, which was proven in the wake of the fraudulent election 7 1/2 months ago?
The days of counting on the SC to uphold the Constitution are a quaint memory now.
It’s going to require a constitutional amendment or else a SCOTUS ruling which allows it. SCOTUS rulings after the election of Donald Trump was stolen stated they can’t get involved in how a state runs its elections. If that sets precedent, and it does(!), then they can’t write law to make it so because the federal government (hereafter referred to as the feral government) lacks the authority under the constitution.
SCOTUS only eliminated ITSELF from State-run elections. It remains to be seen whether or not SCOTUS will allow CONGRESS to do it.
As in so many OTHER instances, SCOTUS has used Parseltongue and BS to violate the Constitution, and I wouldn’t put it past them to do it again.
SCOTUS is the federal government, one branch thereof. When the Constitution designates the STATES as the sole authority to conduct elections and make election laws, it prohibits the federal govt from interfering–ALL branches.
States MUST rediscover and reassert their supremacy over the federal government when the latter acts unconstitutionally. State’s have a DUTY to tell the Fed govt to go pound sand.
Thank you.??
The language in the Constitution seems to allow for Congress to change voting.
Article I.
Section 4.
Actually the language in the Constitution allows Congress to change the voting.
Article 1. Section 4.
“The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.
The Congress shall assemble at least once in every Year, and such Meeting shall be on the first Monday in December, unless they shall by Law appoint a different Day.”
They can try but it would have to fail. The constitution is very explicit on the fact that states run their elections. It would have to be challenged and will be challenged by every state that originally sued for the SCOTUS to rule against the way other states ran their elections.
Yes, I acknowledge that the 2020 election demonstrated to the world, not just the country, what a fully corrupt federal government system we have in the USA.
And though I do not like to imagine what would happen as this demonstration continues, we are either US Americans who are free or we will demonstrate that we are not. Something will have to give here and it’s hard to imagine it will be the people, ruled by few, who will give in to all of this.
These are communists, they don’t have follow any rules precedents or laws
Obamacare was patently UNCONSTITUTIONAL, but Chief Justice Roberts found a way to make it otherwise.
This ruling–even more than Obamacare–would be the ruling to end all rulings. It would solidify Ruling Class control and power for decades–if not forever.
So yeah, SCOTUS can find a way to make it Constitutional.
He didn’t find a way. He created a fiction to then justify a ruling.
Actually the language in the Constitution allows Congress to change the voting.
Article 1. Section 4.
“The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.
The Congress shall assemble at least once in every Year, and such Meeting shall be on the first Monday in December, unless they shall by Law appoint a different Day.”
So it is not necessarily unconstitutional for Congress to change what the states have up until now controlled.
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artII-S1-C2-1-2-1/ALDE_00001121/
This may be correct. On the other hand, this may also open other doors as, once again, a corrupt SCOTUS has created a fiction about their own jurisdiction and about the nature of that which they are required to rule.
SCOTUS lied about Obamacare being a tax. (Taxes do not compel people to buy things from private entities!) And they lied about their jurisdiction over elections and how they are run by the states.
Yes, I absolutely recognize that they have been successful in enforcing federal law onto SPECIFIC states as punishment for discriminatory acts damaging the people. This, of course happened when the states were permitted to violate the US constitution by allowing their executive offices to create and operate election laws not approved by the constitutionally assigned role of the states legislature.
This places the SCOTUS in tricky territory. If they rule one was and then later in a completely different way, things will move closer to a decisive incident.
This is where Trump should make it clear that any Republican senator voting for this bill is automatically guaranteeing he will be facing not just a primary backed by him, but a recall if possible.
Hanbun, yes. When I read the article, I thought, “The Rs will just roll over for this.”
You’re half right… 😉
.
Any Senator that votes for an un-Constitutional measure has no standing in their own state to even run again, much less represent that states’ citizens.
The tenth amendment isn’t even the issue since our Constitution expressly gives state legislatures providence over their elections.
Flood the Senate offices with pocket Constitutions to reference, and don’t forget to conceal carry your own . . .
Oh joy, that means that “Party A” will be back in control.
Party A won’t even matter when the CCP becomes THE global hegemon if we can’t turn this country around now.
Since January 6th, I’ve been saying it to anyone and everyone; politics as usual will NOT defeat these tyrants. They are THIS close to locking in their power and they are NOT going to let this opportunity slip away.
The Ruling Class knows they will most likely lose the House of Representatives to the Republicans in 2022–and possibly even the Senate. If that happens, Biden is political road kill for his remaining two years.
But if this power-move to federalize elections is successful before 2022, then the Dems will stay in power for perpetuity. They are so close to total control and power they can taste it.
God help us if they get it.
Well, “total control and power” on paper, yes, but in reality, a few (million) might not go along with that!
And you’re correct–this issue will not be resolved by “voting them out”! I’ve been saying that at least as long as you have!
How do you vote them out when Dominion (with a support from both Congress and State Legislatures) nulls our voice and switches our vote.
“God help us if they get it.”
God helps those who help themselves.
THIS is the Crossroad, allow this to go through we are subjects. Stop it and we maintain our freedom.
a snail, on a razor’s edge. what is obscene?
CSPAN
@cspan
·
1h
Happening now: U.S. Senate debate on voting rights legislation – LIVE on C-SPAN2 https://c-span.org/event/?512831/senate-vote-530pm-advance-election-voting-rights-bill…
Vice President Harris presiding.
Procedural vote at 5:30pm ET.
0:40
3.5K views
3
58
80
CSPAN
@cspan
·
1h
.
@SenSchumer
: “I’m pleased to report that Senator Manchin and I have come to an agreement…Sen. Manchin has informed me that he will vote Yes on the motion to proceed to debate the legislation.”
“Come to an agreement” Ewe! That always reeks.
Manchin gets to keep one coal mine open, in exchange for Pencing out on this legislation.
Well, for all that it’s worth (nothing, since they’re both on McConnell’s payroll,) I contacted Scott and Graham… at least they know they’re being watched, even if it doesn’t incentivize them to change anything.
If it passes, or fails, its the way the uniparty wanted it. I just wish they’d knock off the kabuki theatrics since more people are on to them.
Legalize the fraud before the audits can be finished or started: it is very obvious to those paying attention.
Problem: how many Americans are paying attention to the audit story, to the truth behind SB 1, or both?
Good luck with waiting for the Supreme Court to find such a bill unconstitutional: whoever sues will “lack standing,” curious in a democratic republic, where one would think…
…every voter has the “standing right” to demand a free and fair election wherever it occurs in the country!
If there is a rigged election in Maine or Alaska, such fraud affects everyone else in the nation, in the same way that a tiny tumor in the colon will affect one’s entire body!
Legalizing fraud in elections brings us closer to deleterious futures of revolution, dissolution, or Communist oppression.
We’ll get’em in 2022,24…
That’s Ronna Romney McStainiel.
Party of Stupid
Party of Stupid on purpose. The GOP knows what they’re doing…that’s the plan brother.
They aren’t stupid. They are rich
You know, ordinarily I would apply Hanlon’s Razor to your statement and we’d be in agreement. But I’ve decided the Republicans are not so much stupid (although they don’t seem to be very bright) as they are feckless, corrupt, and utterly lacking in principle or conscience.
No wonder they work so well with their senior partners, the Democrats.
I’m wondering if she was in on the steal.
Absolutely
She totally participated in the steal but why Trump trusted a Romney…
Uniparty Commie RINO Piglet.
Evil will destroy itself.
With a little help from the Army of Light!
Where do I sign up?
Not before it destroys everything around it first.
I like the chart at the bottom right. Handy gift for lefttards because it points out the impossibility.
Thanks to our glorious Republican infrastructure, we can’t rely on the Supreme Court justices to act in accord with the constitution. I would not be shocked if they were to approve of this bill while simultaneously saying they have no say in how states rejected any of Trump’s petitions for election audits. The ability to hold mutually contradicting legal views based on situational law (ie, who benefits) is a feature of leftist jurisprudence (to the extent you want regard it as having anything to do with justice).
They really do want a war.
No. Congress is nulling the Executive, blurring separation of powers with support from the Judicial. End game is replace our Republic with a Parliamentary system then remove Bill of Rights.
They wat us to bear arms to bring the military into play.
I agree, but the law of unintended consequences is a *itch. They may think the military will make short work of us, but they may be wrong, and if they are, it will turn out to be the Mother of all (bad) Assumptions.
You don’t make short work of graybeards with the same training and determination as them.
Wouldn’t this require a Constitutional Amendment since the authority for elections is already vested with the state legislatures? I mean Barack Obama is a Constitutional Law Expert so doesn’t he know that???
Barry was out smoking a blunt with Frank Marshall Davis that day
Obama’s Choom Gang has gone Nationwide.
Please read the actual language in the Constitution.
Article I, Section 4
My initial reaction was the same but there has long been a practice of legislating “voting rights” against the states and the courts have sustained as much.
The STICKY problem here is that the SCOTUS said they don’t have the power to rule over this when they CLEARLY do have that as demonstrated by countless rulings related to voting rights which were clearly violated by many states in the 2020 election.
I love that graphic at the end with Biden didn’t win.
But it also drives home the fact, that at the end of day all elections are run locally. My concern is that all the Red States haven’t thrown these vote flipping machines “into the fiery chasm from which they came”.
Keep in mind they ‘must’ flip votes in Red districts or the level of fraud in ‘Blue’ counties would be way too high to hide. Red districts are the best place to find real patriots that sit on these election boards. Their is no reason why patriots within the district can’t be asked, and won’t respond to hand count the ballots after verifying the legitimacy of the voter. Heck my little district in King County only ever has about 800 votes. I will gladly volunteer to double blind count that many votes.
For example outside of deep ‘blue’ King County Washington or Multnomah County Oregon, both WA and OR would be Red.
Its like a cancer, once it takes over a significant population center in your State it destroys the entire State via both election and voter fraud.
“In the midst of these pleasing ideas we should be unfaithful to ourselves if we should ever lose sight of the danger to our liberties if anything partial or extraneous should infect the purity of our free, fair, virtuous, and independent elections.”– President John Adams, March 4, 1797.
Turn Off the Lights.
Good Night America.
I had continued to hope we would not lose our country but if this passes we are done, as is voting.
No, we are never done, even with voting, or other forms of ‘throwing sand into the gears’.
For we owe debt to those that gave their last, over the untold years, so that we would have a chance to be free.
A debt that is most perfectly paid the same way our Lord and Savior paid for it, though I hope it doesn’t ultimately come to that.
Regardless until the Second Coming, we mere mortals, must perpetually do battle, at all levels, with the useful idiots of Satan.
This in the end is how we show God which side we are on, even if we are unsuccessful in this age.
Amen.
And somehow really know what the founding fathers were up against.
I was at the Indy 500 this year, bucket list. It was an outpouring of patriotic pride. The flyover, the passionate rendition of our National Anthem and “God Bless America”, the military present… The announcer didn’t have to tell people to rise and take your hats off…we just did it. The only thing I could think is America! I cried for the first time I’ve ever heard that Anthem sung.
We aren’t done, we’re the American Spirit. This isn’t the end it’s the beginning, and we’ll come to realize each and everyone one of us….US, me and you, just how precious that ideal is worthy of this fight.
19 year olds at Normandy DEMAND it.
They still live within us, I will NOT surrender.
Yes, all Patriots are pulled as if by a magnet.
It’s the very same force that pulled our many ancestors to leave everything and take the perilous journey to America in the first place.
Patriot!!
10 year war fighting for the rights of Englishmen. Now it’s Americans fighting, not to gain their rights but to preserve them.
The left / Ruling Class never intended anything else. The election of Trump by We the People just pissed them off and motivated them to accelerate their plans.
We aren’t voting ourselves out of this. I just wish I could convince more people of that reality.
Yes! Pardon me, but he ripped the mask off! How ironic? Easy to see if you can think for yourself. Go time, or sit down and shut up forever time.
Trust me max_cass……in the heartland most are convinced.
???
Good ol Joe Machin. He’s a simeball.
I expected him to cave….he always does.
SenSchumer: “I’m pleased to report that Senator Manchin and I have come to an agreement…Sen. Manchin has informed me that he will vote Yes on the motion to proceed to debate the legislation
Manchin green lighted the debate….Run the news cycle-Until reality can no longer be denied.
He will be handsomely rewarded for his “yes” vote. Explains why the Democrats are so good at money laundering.
Yes but his reward is worthless in both Heaven and Hell.
Only his shame will remain for all time, as is just.
Such wisdom when you step back and marvel in it.
Praise be to God.
Nearly everyone in the Senate needs to be removed.
Seriously, who among them would MAGA keep in a primary?
On the question of whether S1 is unconstitutional, clearly it is. However, I think most comments on this topic miss the point of what SCOTUS has done recently with election cases. SCOTUS has removed itself from election matters, leaving things up to the states. In the case of S1, I think this means SCOTUS refuses to hear any challenge, citing deference to Congress, the state-elected representatives. I think SCOTUS simply defers to the Congress and says its up to them.
The sCOTUS can’t both ‘not’ intervein in 2020 and then intervein via HR1 against the clear black letter law of the Constitution. My guess is that sCOTUS will defer on both counts. Hope springs eternal.
Then again we are living in post-constitutional times. Which is why the only flag I have flown since Jan 20th is the Betsy Ross flag, ie the flag before the war of independence 1.0 as we are currently in 2.0. Plus 10 of my direct ancestors fought under that flag.
The fight remains though at the State level. In fact I would say that at the county level many Red States have cancerous Blue Counties within them that can flip them from truth to lies.
Plus most counties state wide, even Red ones, still use vote flipping machines that in effect lower the threshold of the voter fraud required by the corrupt blue counties.
Remove them now and call on the citizens in your district to count legitimate paper ballots by hand.
Seriously, just look at who these blue county voters ‘send’ back into office again and again. Would any sane voter do that? The answer is no, if the vote wasn’t corrupted.
Don’t know about y’all, but I’m going to Vegas and betting the 401k that SCOTUS takes a pass and gives the Ruling Class (of which SCOTUS is a charter member in good standing) exactly what they want–total control.
Hey, I might be a peasant but I’ll be a rich peasant–till the IRS confiscates it.
I fear you are right but I pray you are wrong.
SCOTUS did NOT defer to elected state representatives….they ALLOWED appointed SCJs in PA both BEFORE and AFTER the election to set the electio0n rules unconstitutionally…it takes 4 USSCJs to decide to review a matter…the champions of liberty could only marshal 3
Don’t the Totalitarians need 10 Republican votes to begin debate on this monstrosity?
If not, it’s over right?
It just takes 50 votes to bring it to the floor for debate. Would still need 60 votes to pass.
Thanks
Articles about this are all over the map
I was wrong. Per the AP below, the vote for debate needed 60 votes, which is not what I read earlier. My apologies.
https://apnews.com/article/gop-elections-bill-senate-showdown-0cd91c559b314a695c08ff9e4abd5d8a
Joe Manchin has lied his way through our state elections for years. He does what he wants until about a year and then he is all nicey nicey guy. Remember how often he promised to work with President Trump only to do the opposite until that year roll around? They use to tell me how good Byrd was for WV too. If he was such a great guy for WV why was it we were always on the bottom of everything rated good? We were only on top when it was a rating of something bad. Manchin is not good for WV and I wish people would wake up before we end up blue.
“…I wish people would wake up before we end up blue.“
With mandatory fraud, EVERY state will be “blue,” except…not really.
Yes, a Great Awakening is needed indeed: without such an event, get ready for the United Socialist States of America, a monstrous combination of Huxley’s Brave New World and Orwell’s 1984.
We shall see whether President Trump’s summer rallies will make a difference by awakening people to the Truth of this power grab!
Did this go to the House first? Did they pass it?
I believe so.
Yes, over a month ago.
I’m reminded of an old joke:
“Sire, the peasants are revolting.”
“You can say that again.”
Whatever happened to States rights as clearly outlined in the constitution. Like everything else these corrupt politicians do they consider the constitution a living breathing instrument. If this unconstitutional act were to pass, it would probably be overturned, unfortunately that could take years. Time for States to secede from the Union if this bill passes. The defining moment is being pushed to the eruption point.
Secession isn’t the answer–not yet and not by a long shot.
States have the Constitutional authority and duty to DECLARE null and void any federal law whereby the federal government overreaches into what is Constitutionally reserved to the states. Hint: powers DELEGATED by the states (not surrendered) to federal government are the authority, ON BEHALF OF THE STATES, to wage war, make peace, negotiate alliances and foreign trade. All powers to be exerted on external actors (foreign policy). That’s it. Very limited and defined.
EVERY OTHER AUTHORITY rests with the states, and when the federal government infringes on states’ authority, the states MUST say no.
The states created the federal government. They are the creators, and thus are more powerful than that which they created.
We don’t teach this anywhere, but it is in our Constitution and in the reems of documents the Founders wrote. They gave us the means to stop the federal government WITHOUT BLOODSHED, but we are so woefully lacking in our knowledge……
Obamalama
It occurs to me we’ll never really be rid of this miscreant.
Very unfortunate.
We’re still saddled with Bill and Hillary and the ripple effects of their years in office. Exhibit A: giving China most-favored-nation status. It’s the toe hold China needed to take over our manufacturing base and turn the economic tables against us and toward them. They used their new profits from selling us junk to rebuild their military.)
Thanks, Hill and Bill….
Great – there’s no hope short of hot war. Our children and grandchildren will live or die under complete tyranny.
” Pelosi has the military defenses around the Capitol prepared to keep back any revolting peasants”
Is America paying $750 Billion a year for its own executioner?
Charlotte Taylor Wilson: You don’t really believe the people are happy!
Don Diego: All I know is the soldiers are quite happy shooting the people who say the people are not happy.
A standing army is one of the greatest mischief that can possibly happen. Without standing armies liberty can never be in danger, nor with large ones safe. A standing military force, with an overgrown Executive will not long be safe companions to liberty. The means of defense against foreign danger, have been always the instruments of tyranny at home. Among the Romans it was a standing maxim to excite a war, whenever a revolt was apprehended. Throughout all Europe, the armies kept up under the pretext of defending, have enslaved the people.
– James Madison (“The Father of the United States Constitution”)
What, sir, is the use of a militia (2nd Amendment)? It is to prevent the establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty. Whenever Governments mean to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia (2nd Amendment), in order to raise an army upon their ruins..
– Elbridge Gerry, Jame Madison’s Vice President
When a government wishes to deprive its citizens of freedom, and reduce them to slavery, it generally makes use of a standing army.
– Luther Martin, Maryland delegate to the Constitutional Convention
How wise they were. If only we had listened…..
THE FORK THE PEOPLE
RAPE OF AMERICA
MAY THEY BURN IN HELL FOREVER
The idiots on TV said Schumer doesn’t have the votes to push this thru, but he’s staging this vote as a way to convince Dems to do away with the filibuster.
That’s malarkey. IF Schumer wanted the filibuster to go, it would already be gone.
They’re gonna ram this thing thru, folks, and it’s REALLY gonna hurt. This is their way of ensuring that GOP held State Legislatures don’t Stop The Steal In 2022, returning both Pelosi and Schumer to the back benches.
BOHICA
Only a brain dead moron couldn’t see the sudden reversal of Abrams, Warnock and the other commies, as the Alinsky trick it is.
If only we had a recording of those meetings when the Dems scheme and plot how to reverse their opposition to voter ID.
Joe Manchin is from West Virginia….yet he’s not afraid of being defeated. Because they all know the machine counts the votes. Make it turn out any way you want it to.
Saul Alinsky tactic—
“The organizers first job is to create the issues or problems, and organizations must be based on many issues. The organizer must first rub raw the resentments of the people of the community; fan the latent hostilities of many of the people to the point of overt expression. He must search out controversy and issues, rather than avoid them, for unless there is controversy people are not concerned enough to act. . . . An organizer must stir up dissatisfaction and discontent.” ~ Saul Alinsky
“They have the guns and therefore we are for peace and for reformation through the ballot. When we have the guns then it will be through the bullet.” ~ Saul Alinsky
Meanwhile conservatives sit on their hands. “Maybe we’ll have an audit,” says the PA legislature, Cheboygan, MI and Fulton County, GA. “Maybe we’ll announce the audit results in August,” says the AZ legislature. Still don’t have passwords and routers. Still planning to recess. No big deal, the left is just nuking the filibuster and codifying electoral fraud. Let’s yell about white people or aliens instead. If this bill passes, I don’t want to hear another word from Donald J. Trump or any of his family again.
What the heck does President Trump or his family have to do with this, He has fought hard against this dam bill
“Pelosi has the military defenses around the Capitol prepared to keep back any revolting peasants; but that security only works if the politicians don’t leave DC.”
LOL. That’s right and we’re furious! Maybe they should all just stay in DC and we can convince the Military to keep them there. We can then secede the rest of the country from the Corrupticrats in Washington. They’ve exceeded their usefulness.
White House gives full-throated support to federal voting legislation that would change voting laws in every state, using Jan. 6 as justification.
’using Jan. 6 as justification’— Let’s hope that comes back to undeniably kick their own backside.
lie lie lie, that’s all I heard….in fact, I think that’s all they do.
As I said at the first utterance of this monstrosity, HB1/SB1 is the back breaker for our Republic. It cannot be allowed to pass into law.
Despite the interests of the “Uniparty”, even Republicans know that this bill would destroy them forever. Even the POS Turtle knows his power would be zapped, gone with this passed. Hopes to overtake the commies via elections would be dreamsickles…wastes of time. The fix is permanently in.
ANY R that votes for this deserves to burn in hell for eternity.
The only way a Democrat can win….CHEAT
In a town of TweedleDee and TweedleDum, Joe is bi-Tweedle.
Says it all
Spread that one Far and Wide! 😉
He’s a typical con-man!
Did you know…
They act with impunity.
LOLOL…ain’t that the truth!
I hope this sets in motion states deciding secession is preferable to having some assholes in Washington micro managing elections.America is worth saving….but not this Government.
California, NY and some other states are excellent examples of states ignoring the Federal gov’t and federal law. Secession is old school. Ignore the law on the ground in the red states. But I do give the left credit for how they wield power. It certainly should be a lesson to us.
State nullification.
Although they try to slip it all in under another guise
To all their action most foul we must still be wise
Despite the avalanche of bigger and bigger lies
Dancing in the democrats evermore Nazi like eyes!
Wondering if Nancy Pelosi has sufficient hand strength to rip the Constitution in half, as she did with Trump’s SOTU.
Sure demonstrates the fraud that Manchin has sold for many many years
There is a simple solution to this federal power grab. The state legislatures in those states where the legislature is controlled by the GOP simply need to pass a resolution (it need not even be a law signed by the governor) that electoral votes can only be allocated by an election conducted in accordance with state law. If any election deviates from state law and is conducted by federal law instead, the legislature will not recognize the outcome of the election and the legislature will reclaim its right to allocate the electors by legislative resolution.
It may not help down ballot, but it will help with POTUS elections. Of course, the Constitutionality of the federal takeover needs to be challenged, but this provision can be a back-up plan if the Court challenges don’t work out or are delayed past the next election. The GOP legislature would basically be saying “go ahead, big foot us and force us to hold our elections in your corrupt manner, but you can’t make us recognize the results.”
Now that many States are FINALLY beginning/taking the first baby steps to clean up their voting act, NOW the Fed Gov. wants control of the Elections.
Really tells you all you need to know.
If it passes, who will make sure each state will abide by it? Texas, for one, won’t comply, IMO. Other states will follow. This could get very interesting.
Moral victory, I suppose?
https://conservativebrief.com/republicans-block-dems-43409/
Dims and Unifreaks are stepping on Federal Election Takeover before the State Audits come out.
freaking as we are speaking
Mourning as we are groaning
.