The DOJ, Sidney Powell and the Sullivan appointed amicus John Gleeson will hold a hearing today in the courtroom of Judge Emmet Sullivan to argue the unopposed motion to dismiss the case against Michael Flynn. The hearing begins at 11:00am ET and you can call-in to hear the audio of the live courtroom events. (details below)
- 877-336-1839 – (access code 5524636)
- 888-363-4734 – (access code 6114909)
- 877-336-1839 – (access code 1429888)
- 877-402-9753 – (access code 2090166)
- 888-557-8511 – (access code 4140864)
- 888-273-3658 – (access code 1773796)
UPDATE: If you cannot get through on any phone line use this periscope link HERE
UPDATE 2: Technical issues at the court. Recess called until 12:35pm ET to work on issues. I’m Dropping another link (YouTube) below that was not compromised during the “technical issues”.
UPDATE 3: Some more technical glitches and a 15 min bio break until 2:45pm ET
UPDATE 4: Hearing ended abruptly.
.
If the true administration of justice was to prevail in this case, the judge should simply accept the unopposed motion and this would be the end of the malicious prosecution. However, this case has so many precedents anything is possible.
If you are listening-in to the hearing, feel free to drop your thoughts and opinions into the comment section to share.
Trump’s tweets, “poor Mr. Strzok’s emails were altered”. No Special Counsel’s office members believes these charges were unjustified…OMG I can see where this is going!!
Can’t let Trump have a win just hours before the debate!
Pretty clear to me that Sullivan is a puppet – he is not capable of thinking on his feet or internalizing arguments made by others. He is working a punch list of points that were provided to him to get on the record. He is a complete moron.
So Gleason is the expert on with or without prejudice?
I wish they could have televised this hearing. Now Strzok the Unbiased’s lawyer says the text messages were edited. Ok then, let see ALL HIS TEXTS (and from his PRIVATE phone too! No doubt SuperTexterBoy had work-related texts on his private phone….along with erotic pictures he no doubt sent to Princess Gingiva Page. What a failure of a counter-intel chief….especially in light of the DEVASTATING damage inflicted by traitor Robert Hansson 1975-2001).
Sully determined not to dismiss with prejudice.
An oddity? for the presiding judge to counteract the the dismissal request of the prosecution!
Gleason given more talking time than Sydney Powell.
Well, no, Sullivan didn’t rush her, like, not at all, let her speak at length as she desired…
Sounds like after the get there say audio gos out again
Hmmmmm!
I am no lawyer.
But the defendant asking for dismissal months ago, seems not to be a part of this process?
The Judge is asking questions of the government attorneys, not Sydney Powell? Someone should note the lack of questioning and concern for the defendant posed by this Judge.
No credible witnesses, no prosecutors?
Dismissal is the only
Sullivan has given her an opportunity to speak once. Then he cut her off and all but dismissed her statements. It might just be me, but I get the feeling Mr. Sullivan would rather be anywhere but there.
He also accused her of being a crook, or at least an unethical lawyer.
The more the government carries the water instead of Sidney Powell, the better.
It is not that she can’t do it, it is more authoritative when they do it, and who Sullivan was addressing the questions to.
we expect nothing more from the judge . . . he is so conflicted.
Sullivan was compaining that Flynn wanted the case dismissed instead of having a hearing on a plea withdraw first, then have a dismissal hearing he could deny.
Remember, that was before excupatory info was released.
With Halloween approaching a certain judge can change out of his clown costume into this –
https://www.halloweencostumes.com/banana-flasher-costume.html?mpid=18156&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIlKawnPqO7AIVi8DICh131gb6EAQYAiABEgKUMfD_BwE
Powell and Flynn still do not have all of the ‘exculpatory’ evidence.
It would be useful to file a civil suit against the DOJ, FBI, and the government prosecutors individually (van grack, etc), all persons individually (known or unknown) who withheld evidence or participated in ‘leaking’, the ‘coup’, spying on Flynn, AND JUDGE SULLIVAN for extortion, wrongful prosecution, denial if civil rights under color of law, ethics violations, withholding evidence….. There should be no judicial privilege for denial of civil rights under color of law, or participation in crimes. The discovery requests for all the ‘missing 302s’ and other withheld records, depositions of the coup plotters themselves would put AG Barr and Rat-cliffe in a squeeze. Flynn was likely in the 85% illegal FBI spying. Release the records, or have the existing evidence stand which already shows illegal spying, extortion and wrongful prosecution.
This would be a civil suit, but should assist in removing Sullivan. Filing a criminal “counterclaim” is unheard of in criminal suits, but perhaps the DOJ could be persuaded to do so here against the perps who are also part of the ‘coup’?
Civil court would just defer until the criminal case was completed. In a real world we would all see what you have recommended as a way to get justice….in their world, they will use the criminal case to block the civil case.
gleeson is losing it.
That horse ra out of the barn a very long time ago.
ran
Since when does a judge need a caddy?? (Gleason) THIS AIN’T GOLF!!!
Gleeson arguing for dismissal WITHOUT prejudice.
Making assertions and accusations against DOJ with noevidence.
Pushing FARA and “possible violations” in other conversations…
“typical rule”
“but I, as amicus, don’t have a dog in that race” after taking time to opine.
FUAH! slips out
Gleeson wants Sullivan to address meanness by the Sidney and the DOJ
It just became crystal clear, Gleason is the replacement blocker (replacing the corrupt Special Counsel’s Office) to keep this going.
Great job by the government attorneys, by the end I could hear the disdain for Sullivan in the government attorney’s voice and argument
Gleason is Sullivan’s bff
Gleason: “I don;t have a dog in that …”
Hey you idiot, your have NO DOGS in this case!!!
Then why is he there talking?
Judge read Gleason’s op-ed against Flynn, so he appointed known never-Trumper as court amicus to represent prosecution after the real PROSECUTORS DROPPED THE CASE!!
Read this:
https://nypost.com/2020/05/14/old-op-ed-shows-where-judge-picked-to-oversee-flynn-case-stands/
Right, why is he there talking?
And take into your consideration that poor court reporter that we are paying for — for how many $$$$ per hour while Gleason prattles on about the President’s tweets.
At least President Trump doesn’t charge us for his tweets, Gleason
I’m sick to my stomach over the actions and inactions of this sphincter-orifice claiming to be a judge.
He’s not a judge – he is ANTIFA in a robe.
BLM in a robe.
You should feel ok, he’d only do this to someone connected with President Trump. Any other defendant and he’d follow the rule of law.
?
Insane that a FEDERAL JUDGE would delegate his authority and reasoning to a third party. WTF?
‘ask for the reasons…the real reasons.’ They want the Government to say Flynn was given a deal.
The purpose of this circus is to GET TRUMP.
https://twitter.com/reeveslawstl/status/1311004945123082240
But Sullivan’s job at this point is simply to keep the case going…It WILL be dismissed eventually, whether through an Appellate Court or SCOTUS but every day it drags on is one less day for Gen Flynn to be free to talk!!
LET SYDNEY SPEAK!
She doesn’t need to do so – the DOJ is killing all avenues for Sullivan to travel to keep this thing alive. They have the benefit of being perceived as more neutral – they are not advocates for Gen. Flynn.
Absolutely pathetic. Sullivan is raging idiot. THERE IS ZERO BASIS FOR THIS SCAM TO CONTINUE
THE TWEEETSSSS!!!
This Crime was committed in the West Wing! – Gleeson
Everyone should hang up and let Gleeson and Sullivan continue to talk shit…..
The crime is actually happening in Sullivan’s court with Sullivan’s complicity! SPIT
Gleason should give a lot of weight to the president’s tweets. What a buffoon.
If court and judge is influenced by (tweets) in any case making their job harder, (cannot do their job?) where a person is either proven or not proven guilty; by what considerations are they presiding over the case?
Wish Sullivan could be questioned under oath on how often he has consulted with Eric Holder and/or others from Covington concerning this case.
I wish Sullivan could be questioned in a back alley. ?
I wish Sullivan was given some answers in a back alley.
better!
Gleason has an incurable case of TDS.
“What about the Tweets?” Sheesh!!! WHAT ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION and THE RULE OF LAW???
Sully already says Flynn is guilty.
What a crook.
The crime was the set up you POS and you know it.
No freaking prosecutor, no freaking crime.
Never heard Sullied-Van speak before. He comes across as an idiot, contradicts himself, cuts counsel off, loves to hear himself, talks in circles. How does a fool like this get to such a critical position? It is just sickening.
Gleason, an amicus for a criminal trial. Unheard of. No wonder Powell wants anything he has said thrown out.
Sullivan is convinced Biden will win
Now he asks Gleeson “under what authority can I deny the motion without prejudice.” Gleeson waffles, and says its an open question. The “off the rack” / “default” rule is without prejudice. He cites no cases and starts rambling about calls with Kislyak. Says if he grants the motion it should be without prejudice, but I have “no dog in this race.” Gleeson can’t even get his cliches straight.
Gleeson now says that this “pretextual” dismissal is clear on its face. Next logical step, if motion denied, would be to address the motion to withdraw. Gleeson now waxing poetic about the significance of a guilty plea. Claims Flynn changes his mind because the wind is blowing a different way.
Now Suspicious Sullivan goes back to the tweets from POTUS. Asks what weight he should give them. Gleeson says the fact that additional Brady material keeps coming forth means the DOJ keeps adding new reasons to dismiss, proving pretext. Claims DOJ is not giving the “real reasons” for dismissal.
Gleeson is saying this a collusion between the President and the DOJ
booger??
Exactly. ?
He is just making up his own freaking story. What a crock.
The executive can collude with itself? Who knew? Didn’t our illustrious Erik the Red say he was the President’s “wing man”–but they were black, so that was ok, right?
Gleeson reply so very weak. No proof of misconduct accusations.
he wants to dismiss all the disclosed violations because “he plead guilty”.
Now asking for inference divining, tweet fantasies, wants to mak it an issue, as if.
No proof of interference if tweets are all they got. That’s it?
AGAIN:
“Your job Judge.”
Gleeson, the hired hand of Judge Sullivan, ignores all things since Flynn pleaded guilty….twice.
Except Trump tweets.
For one without standing, Gleeson is getting an awful lot of air time?
Neither Sullivan or Gleeson can show evidence only their feelings and opinion. Actions of PDJT are not direct evidence of General Flynn’s guilt or innocence.
Here we go with more Trump tweets!!! Consulted with defense counsel…here we go!
It’s all Trump’s fault…..WTF
Sullivan just lets Gleeson keep going and going against President Trump
They got Nothing!
This is the Judicial version of crazies screaming at the sky…
I envision a video meme of Gleeson rapping at a BLM “protest”
Check out Biden: hairylegs on youtube or spotify if you haven’t laughed yet today
Here it comes — let’s create another impeachment based on, not a phone call, but a bunch of Tweets!!!!
Gleason continues to falsify the facts again and again. Gleason will drag this out as long as possible. No conclusion anytime soon. Flynn will eventually be exonerated.
Gleason now complaining about Trump tweets and 1 short recent briefing conversation with Trump.
DOJ and Attorney report directly to the President.
I listened to 5 minutes of this embarrassing sham and I cannot say anything favorable about Gleason, God help me for my thoughts on what can happen to him.
Not the US vs General Michael Flynn. It is Judge Sullivan vs the US Gov and General Michael Flynn.
Gleeson is an idiot
I must disagree – he is Very Clever to stitch up a story out of such scraps.
Some legal saying they hava about cloth…
He is evil though.
Gleason is a private citizen who wants Flynn in jail. He should not be part of this judicial proceeding.
Kudos to the liberal hacks on the Court of Appeals for allowing this clown show.
Gleeson argued that all this evidence of wrongdoing being put forward by the current DOJ is “pretense” and shows a “consciousness of guilt”.
Unbelievable.