The DOJ, Sidney Powell and the Sullivan appointed amicus John Gleeson will hold a hearing today in the courtroom of Judge Emmet Sullivan to argue the unopposed motion to dismiss the case against Michael Flynn. The hearing begins at 11:00am ET and you can call-in to hear the audio of the live courtroom events. (details below)
- 877-336-1839 – (access code 5524636)
- 888-363-4734 – (access code 6114909)
- 877-336-1839 – (access code 1429888)
- 877-402-9753 – (access code 2090166)
- 888-557-8511 – (access code 4140864)
- 888-273-3658 – (access code 1773796)
UPDATE: If you cannot get through on any phone line use this periscope link HERE
UPDATE 2: Technical issues at the court. Recess called until 12:35pm ET to work on issues. I’m Dropping another link (YouTube) below that was not compromised during the “technical issues”.
UPDATE 3: Some more technical glitches and a 15 min bio break until 2:45pm ET
UPDATE 4: Hearing ended abruptly.
.
If the true administration of justice was to prevail in this case, the judge should simply accept the unopposed motion and this would be the end of the malicious prosecution. However, this case has so many precedents anything is possible.
If you are listening-in to the hearing, feel free to drop your thoughts and opinions into the comment section to share.
Arguing conspiracies theories in court…
All this makes me want to make a donation here:
https://mikeflynndefensefund.org/
Just donated 🙂
Yep, PT tweets truth.
All true.
This hearing scheduled to coincide with the debate…fuel for GET TRUMP.
You know it, we know it!
Gleason is a Biden voter. Enough said.
Yup.
https://nypost.com/2020/05/14/old-op-ed-shows-where-judge-picked-to-oversee-flynn-case-stands/
Earlier this year the president said (tweeted) “good luck” – what a travesty!
jx,
Simply put, ‘What saith the scriptures?’
Gen Flynn, where are your accusers?
Here comes a lengthy presentation impugning the character of the President. All of it goes uninterrupted by Sullivan, a courtesy he did not extend early to the defense table when he interrupted Powell at least 20 times in 5 minutes.
And lawyers thought the trial in a Few Good Men was crazy.
Sullivan might be wondering now why he invited Gleeson to the party.
If he thought that, Sullivan would have shut down Gleeson’s political speech against President Trump
booger??
Yep. Sully loves it. Probably knew the plan to drag in PTs tweets.
Whatw crock? Attacking Trump!
Sheer bullshit posturing.
Gleeson says President Trump tweeted “Good Luck” to Flynn just before Dec. 2017(18)hearing before Sullivan: since Sullivan did not sentence at that hearing, is that proof that Sullivan was conspiring with President Trump via tweets???
Now says “dirty cops” is a false narrative!!!!
Dude: Evidence!
DOJ independence?
What a joke!
This is the first time. President has NOT had an AG.
Liars
Former AG Holder described himself as Obama’s “Wingman”?
What a crock these people are trying to get us to eat
Revolting. Literally
wondering??
Revolting, indeed.
I’m Joe Biden and I approve of this trial.
How are Gleeson’s remarks relevant to the issue? Sullivan cut off Sidney, you made you point, what’s your next point?
All for the news programs.
This is what Federal Court is. Have you heard a SINGLE judge criticize the way this case is proceeding? Me neither.
Sullivan said he didn’t read everything, but he did read Sidney’s letter. Some say this is unsettling because it shows bias. I think it also shows that he doesn’t think Flynn is guilty- why bother reading exculpatory evidence? Even Gleason is telling him no need for evidentiary hearing (of course, the dirt would be on full display). But if Gleason knows the truth, then he has one choice: to do the right thing. I think there is a low chance of that.
Barr has created a huge hole that Sullivan and Gleason are driving through. Barr should have already censured and disciplined the Special Counsel Lawyers for violating Brady. The lack of definitive official actions by the DOJ against Team Mueller is harming Flynn now.
That being said, Gleason arguing before the court is gross violation of the Flynn’s rights. The judge is allowing a partisan WITH NO STANDING to make arguments against defendant. Sullivan should be severely disciplined for allowing this.
^ Spot on
That’ll happen after he bleaches his skin WHITE.
Gleason is just flat out lying and misrepresenting the law.
And he can get away with it because he’s “retired”.
Would be interesting to know what his pension is.
Netflix deal.
This is such bs! I can’t take much more of this Ahole
TDS on full display.
Yes it is. Gleason stopped making legal arguments. It’s all seems very personal now.
Wow, is Gleason arguments have zero merit. Wow! How about all the Obama interference. Give me a break.
He concluded by saying “the only inference you can draw is government corruption”. I guess Gleeson worked in a Court of Opinion and not a Court of Law
Gleeson Is a 100% wan£3r.
I wish Sidney could get 25% of the time Gleeson is being given, without interruption.
If Gleeson is so bent out of shape about PDJT tweets that is because he thinks Sullivan isn’t strong enough to ignore the President’s tweets. This is NOT about President Donald Trump.
No, our President argues for truth and justice.
This people really really do hate Trump. I mean really. How long did they discuss Trump’s tweets?
Gleason is just bashing P. Trump’s tweets as if they are relevant to the actions of the FBI in framing Flynn or withholding Brady information from him. He is being allowed to say the tweets, etc. are all lies without challenge. I’m sure his “testimony” will be repeated in 3 second sound bites on the news tonight. . . oops, the hearing just crashed again.
my feed just died…
try this:
No sound.
Sound off again….what a crock
Anyone else lose the audio?
Funny that happened right when they were going to argue what the snake just said.
grrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Does Gleason have security clearances that Sidney does not?
Interesting question.
Of course not but that won’t stop crooked Deep Staters funneling illegally obtained information to him.
Odds are 100:1 that the unapproved, illegal hacking of the NSA database by Deep State insiders continues to this day….
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5xU9-eVvKw&feature=emb_logohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5xU9-eVvKw
This one seems to work.
Thanks!
Working.
And that’s it?
Phones cut off!?!
Of course it goes dead after Sullivan’s butt boy finishes his TDS remarks.
So the MSM has the quotes they need for tonight and none of Sidney’s responses will be available…tell me again how the media is “unbiased”! Grrrrr!!
Here we go again…obstruction of justice by both Pres. Trump & AG Barr will be the cry from the dems!
Sullivan is going to need to book a full 60min at Hand & Stone to relieve all the twists & turns he’s putting himself through to deny the motion to dismiss.
Am I getting a free class in Judgeship 101?
Lost the audio on you tube. Anyone still have a working link?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5xU9-eVvKw&feature=emb_logo
It’s back.
Was just informed that there are “387 participants on the call” including me
I need to go to work but I want to be here and be witness to this.
Somehow I think Flynn would stand up for me — I owe him this
You can listen here (don’t need a phone line):
IT guy 1: hey how long should we set thisnnidge Sullivan heading bridge up for?
IT Guy 2: I don’t know, make it 3.5 hours, can’t imagine it going THAT long!
Gleeson seems to be chaneling Biden.
then he would have physically attacked the DOJ guys.
Judge tripped the audio.
People don’t get the solemnity of the federal court? Puh-lease! After the way this is going today?! After the way this court has treated General Flynn.
When do you lawyers learn about evidence? Isn’t that first semester? Gleeson missed that class.
OMG getting tired of Gleason’s filibustering…”I embrace Fokker” /eyeroll
Who is this Gleason guy, after all? His bias and snideness are obvious. He’s giving “evidence.” Is that his role (provided he even has a role here)? So his job is to tell the judge what to do? Is he a replacement for Mueller?
Is Gleason under oath? Can Sydney or the government charge him with perjury if HE doesn’t tell the absolute truth? Can she even object? This seems outrageous, but then I’m no lawyer.
What do the President’s tweets have to do with anything? It seems as if Gleason’s entire purpose is to provide the media with talking points.
What also seems obvious is that they want to drag this out and either be able to charge Flynn again, later on, or force the President to pardon him and then go after the President for something like “abuse of power.”
If Sullivan does dismiss WITHOUT prejudice, then they can come back after Flynn again, if I understand correctly.
I can’t believe Gleason is smearing Barr, as if there aren’t rules of professional behavior.
“They, they, they.” Talk about disrespect.
He exposed himself early when he told Sullivan, “it’s what we told you to do”, & then quickly tried to CYA by saying, ” it’s what we advised you to do.” Who is “we” anyway?
Gleeson refers to “my adversary.” So what is continuing here is an adversarial proceeding, with no parties except the court and the court’s lapdog, Gleeson.
The majority of the DC Circuit knew and wanted this circus to go on.
And when the pendulum swings back, God willing, I will be allowed in this life, to watch them all go down!
This screw up is unbelievable!!
This hearing is so abhorrent it makes me sick!
Gleason and Sullivan sound like 2 BFF!
Absolutely sickening.
Pointing to the President’s tweets is so low. PDJT is not an attorney, he’s just expressing his viewpoint as a member of the public.
Gleason is a nutbag who should be disbarred!
Notice how he answer the “there was a report we talked before your appointment as amicus” (paraphrase) from Sullivan. Gleason answers “this is the first time I’ve had the opportunity to address the Court” (paraphrase). How convenient, yes this is the first time he’s had the opportunity to address the Court – officially. He could’ve talked with Sullivan about the case outside of “the Court”, which neither of them will testify too.
Very clever.
Completely false. So Sullivan and Gleason never spoke or was Gleason’s disgusting editorial in the WaPo enough?
Is Gleason’s editorial relevant? Sure is!! He brought up PDJT’s tweets. Fair game!
Franklin Woody – STFU
Consciousness of guilt. This is ridiculous.
Now they are bitching about Trumps tweets ?? Is that where this ends up ?? Conjuring up Presidential obstruction again?? The gall of these bastards is unbelievable.
Makes you wonder if Sullivan was coordinating with the Gimmydats to set the date of the arguments for September 29th. All the while, knowing that this was the date of the first debate. Fresh accusations for the azz-hulls on the reprobate / debate committee to exploit. Tonight will tell.
Screaming Eagle??
Yep.
I quit believing in coincidences a while ago.