This is a topic that bears keen research and identification of Perry’s ideological position.  His previous positions on Immigration, specifically illegal aliens, was/is a considerable concern of mine.   (more after article)
MANCHESTER, N.H. — He may have been 2,000 miles from the border, but Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry’s immigration record in Texas quickly became the focus in New Hampshire Saturday afternoon.  Speaking to hundreds of Granite State voters at a private reception, the Texas governor was asked whether he supported a fence along the Mexican border.
“No, I don’t support a fence on the border,” he said, while referring to the long border in Texas alone. “The fact is, it’s 1,200 miles from Brownsville to El Paso. Two things: How long you think it would take to build that? And then if you build a 30-foot wall from El Paso to Brownsville, the 35-foot ladder business gets real good.”
Instead, Perry said he supported “strategic fencing” and National Guard troops to prevent illegal immigration and violence from Mexican drug cartels.
The answer produced an angry shout from at least one audience member. And it exposed an ongoing rift with some conservative voters over Perry’s immigration record.  Tea party activists in Texas have been particularly upset by his steady opposition to the fence. He also signed a law giving illegal immigrants in-state tuition for Texas universities. And Texas tea party groups sent Perry an open letter this year expressing disappointment over his failure to get a bill passed that would have outlawed “sanctuary cities,” municipalities that protect illegal immigrants.
Perry has surged to the lead in national polls since joining the presidential race just three weeks ago. But New Hampshire Republicans are just getting to know him.
“I think there are a lot of questions out there still,” said tea party activist Jerry DeLemus, chairman of the Granite State Patriots Liberty PAC. “We don’t know him very well.”
Even in New Hampshire, he said illegal immigration is a key issue with his members and raised concerns about Perry’s immigration policies. DeLemus said a border fence should be part of any policy.    “Any deterrent is a good deterrent,” he said after Perry’s second private reception in Chichester.
Saturday’s visit marks the third time Perry visited the first-in-the-nation primary state since joining the race.  Despite having deep Southern roots and conservative social positions, the Texas native has indicated he will compete aggressively in New Hampshire, where both Republicans and independents vote in the primary election.    (article)
I try not to be a “one issue” ideological voter but illegal immigration is a key topic to fiscal sensibility for our nation.   Diversity is good and I welcome and support/advocate for continued legal immigration.  But, much in the way multiculturalism has failed in Europe, the same can be said for our Republic if we do not value the origin of a “melting pot” approach toward specific American culture.   In short, while this issue may appear insignificant in the grand scheme of our economy, make no mistake it is intrinsically embedded in the problem and any subsequent solution must address it.
Here is a link to a site I visit from time to time to review current immigration positions CLICK HERE and here is also a consideration for RICK PERRY’s POSITION.   Understand that this aforementioned site is strictly a one issue reference point and only looks at immigration issues, legislation, and policies surrounding mostly illegal immigration.  The site is a good sources of well researched and highly cited positions.   However, it is based on a very hardline approach to immigration, the strength of animosity toward the issue within the site I am not in agreement with. …../SD