U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer has asked the Supreme Court to accept the case by next week, hear arguments in early November and “expedite” its ultimate ruling “to the maximum extent feasible.” [Appeal Here] with [Expedited Review Request Here]
[SOURCE]
From the request for expedited consideration, “The en banc Federal Circuit’s erroneous decision has disrupted highly impactful, sensitive, ongoing diplomatic trade negotiations, and cast a pall of legal uncertainty over the President’s efforts to protect our country by preventing an unprecedented economic and foreign-policy crisis,” Sauer notes.
Adding comments from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, “The recent decision by the Federal Circuit is already adversely affecting ongoing negotiations. World leaders are questioning the Presi-dent’s authority to impose tariffs, walking away from or delaying negotiations, and/or imposing a different calculus on their negotiating positions.”
Moreover, “[t]he frameworks for trade agreements already in place contain additional provisions whereby the trade partners agree to significant purchases from and/or in-vestments in the United States.” … “If these agreed upon frameworks were unwound and the investments and purchases had to be repaid, the economic consequences would be catastrophic.” (more)
At issue is the president’s authority under the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA), a 1977 law Trump used to impose baseline tariffs between 10 and 50 percent on goods from countries who do not have Free Trade Agreements with the U.S.
President Trump also declared fentanyl drug shipments a national emergency, providing the administration’s justification for imposing tariffs on Canada, China and Mexico.
Lawfare in federal courts continue.
corporation and deepstate.
Some/many corps must go away as well as pulverizing DS
So am I correct that V.O.S. Selections Inc. , a spirits importer, wants to reck the tariffs and economy of the USA to continue importing alcohol without tariffs? WHO are these people? Checking out V.O.S website they are proud of their BS case and have many links to corporate news websites about their little law suit. Talk about greed.
There just a front company, being backed by bigger fish.
Who? Would love to know!
Makes a person wonder what else is being brought in alongside those shipments of alcohol that the importers are so desperate to get their hands on.
A deep dive may be the way to find out exactly WHO those people are, and what cartel, er, business is they are really running.
Link to FIGHTING THE TARRIFS by VOS: https://vosselections.com/tariffs-blog/
(When you see all the LameStreamMedia sources they use to support their tariff argument, you will understand why all of those outlets have not folded even though they have no audience. There is Dark Money behind the corporate media because there are trillions at stake. HT Sundance)
VOS has no Made in USA wine or spirits and the artwork on some of the bottles looks like it would hang in the homes of anyone named Podesta.
VOS wine and spirits would be paired with crustless cucumber sandwiches for the Gov DisHonest staffers on their selfie-lunches. VOS website has this vibe that they are the favorite of the Uniparty and the Chamber of Compromise.
Not only VOS Selections, also other import based businesses, and several states:
…”FishUSA, Genova Pipe, MicroKits LLC, and Terry Precision Cycling were named as the businesses represented by the Liberty Justice Center alongside wine importer VOS Selections.”…
https://www.thedrinksbusiness.com/2025/05/why-wine-is-at-the-centre-of-the-lawsuit-blocking-trumps-tariffs/
Liberty Justice Center:
https://libertyjusticecenter.org/board-of-directors/
Well. Crown Royal is moving from Ontario to the US! A move that has greatly angered our most loathsome Doug Ford who poured out a bottle during a press conference to show his anger!
https://www.cp24.com/politics/queens-park/2025/09/02/this-is-what-i-think-of-crown-royal-doug-ford-dumps-out-bottle-of-whisky-in-show-of-anger-over-distillers-job-cuts/
Oh please President Trump. Don’t take your foot off the gas pedal. Nothing makes my day better than to see Doug Ford receive the due penalty for his corrupt govt.
DD
While we make MAGA and then, our neighbor to the north great as well, I thank you for Canadians such as yourself who understand what is occurring and how saving America from the rot within will give Canada a chance also.
They always act like its The Evil Manufacturers who are the ones costing people jobs as though they, the politicians, did not set up the environment (high taxes and more) which made moving to another nation more economically feasible.
Follow the money.
Novarro said in a recent interview that he has traced the money and the major lawfirms representing the relatively minor plaintiffs in this case are being funded by big anti-Trump donors (no surprise). These anti-Trump donors are using the tariffs case as a pretext to launch another attack on Trump’s Presidency.
Even the 7-4 federal court ruling was blatantly political, with the 7 being democrats and the 4 being republicans (and the republican judges demonstrated the “correct” legal position in their dissent). Trust in the federal courts is rapidly eroding. The judicial corruption is on full display.
If the Judicial Branch can so flagrantly overstep its authority and undermine the Executive Branch, then when will the Executive Branch respond in kind?
Hope for the best, plan for the worst. Trump’s team indicated they have a back-up plan if they lose at the Supreme Court. If the Supreme Court cannot see what is happening here and rule correctly on this, then we are lost. But then again, this is the same Supreme Court that ruled a President has no standing in a Presidential election.
Rush always said, “follow the money.”
“Trust in the federal courts is rapidly eroding.” Past tense actually.
Shakespeare was prescient in Henry VI to realize the importance of protecting and preserving a fair rule of law so as to shield the people from the wrath of their ruling overlords.
“The first thing we do is, let’s kill all the lawyers.”
The righteousness of the judicial system in this country has been destroyed. Rogue, politically-focused judges have unjustly trampled upon their solemn oaths, and they have destroyed the rule of law.
History will show that John Roberts’ court allowed it to happen. It is so sad. I was once a proud lawyer working hard to uphold the rule of law. Twenty years ago, I saw the beginning cracks in the foundation.
Now, the whole thing lies in ruins. When we revolt, let’s kill all the lawyers first.
Roberts must be given an ultimatum
come on – not all lawyers are crooks – it’s the 95% who give the others a bad name
🤣🤣🤣🤣
I THINK THE CORRECT PERCENTAGE IS 96%
Nope. It’s 98%.
Need to ask for St Thomas Moore’s prayers and intercession!
Ok i’ll see 96% and raise you 2%
Everything in Government has been corrupted. It has been a long process. CDC,NIH promulgate drugs and vaccines that kill not cure. Deep State trying to make the country totalitarian. DOJ,FBI trying to prosecute innocent people and not prosecuting criminals. Dept of Uneducation and Indoctrination. The list goes on and on.
The Best Solution is to massively reduce the size of the federal government and big corporations. In fact in the long run it is the only solution.
Which, of course, the federal government and big corps resist for as long as possible!
Please keep in mind that the phrase from Shakespeare is ambiguous in context: it is spoken by the murderer Dick the Butcher to a revolutionary named Jack Cade.
Given the violent and lawless nature of those characters in Henry VI Part II with The Death of the Good Duke Humphrey of Gloucester, one could say that Shakespeare is showing how lawyers are defenders against criminality.
On the other hand, in the context of the play, they say this after the Good Duke Humphrey – honest and incorruptible – has been unjustly and falsely accused, convicted, and executed thanks to a corrupt legal system.
As with all writers of genius, Shakespeare offers various interpretations: killing “all the lawyers” is the mind-set of criminals, who see an opportunity to run rampant in a corrupted system.
On the other hand, because the corrupted legal system executed a just and innocent man, the people must do something, and certainly at least “some” lawyers are in need of execution themselves.
They are specifically attacking the corrupt system. Shakespeare is using irony by having a criminal say it. Like a whore who deplores immorality or the blind man who can “see”.
Billy does that a lot.
We are rapidly reaching the point where vast swaths of the public simply starts ignoring the courts, ignoring “law” enforcement, etc..
When I got a jury summons last year, I reported as required. On the juror form, where it asks why I could not serve as a juror, I simply wrote, “I cannot participate faithfully on a jury in a court system that allows itself to be twisted and perverted for political means. And which allows investigators and prosecutors to fabricate evidence or withhold evidence as needed to secure a conviction. And which allows completely phony prosecutions of our elected leaders like Trump.”
There were 250 of us in the room. 50 were not called. I was one of them, and I was back at work by 9am.
Congratulations for having the courage to write that. We need more citizens like you.
Nice leg sweep to get out of a headlock Hokkoda. Next time sit in and work jury nullification on those that matter. 😎
You mean old Will wasnt Just writting for the penny of the unwashed groundlings.
Ausonius thanks again as always for your insights, I would have loved your classes.
Hate to say it, but Will was right!
SCOTUS has been politicized.
Ya think? Where have you been?
Asks SCJ Antonin Scalia
BREAKING: US Feral District Clown Judge Bozoberg Orders Trump to Put Narcoterrorists and Their Boat Back Together. Developing …
Love your misspelling of Boarsberg – he has become a laughingstock whether he knows it or not.
I don’t see anything humorous about that evil man.
It never stopped Joey, if they even bothered to sue him. Even when SCOTUS ruled against the dementia patient he ignored them too. That had to be a big slap in the face to most of SCOTUS. Trumps trying to reestablish their legitimacy and our Republic. Time to slap the rest of the courts into irrelevancy.
I think it was Stalin who asked how many battalions has the Pope got.
Mind you there are probably more Stalinists around now than Catholics, most of then so called democrats
Not this Catholic!!!!
Bingo!
The anti-Biden rulings were to make Americans think that SCOTUS is not corrupt but no one (wink wink) actual wanted the pro-America ruling to be enforced.
What is going on in America?
Who runs the country?
I was led to believe it was a Democratic (yes that Democratic) Republic where you elected the government and the President
We are a Republic of individual States. The public does NOT elect the President as in a Democracy. Instead, an Electoral Congress made up of representatives from the States (proportional to the count of members of Congress) elect the President in a ballot in December, officially approved on January 6th by the President of the Congress (the Vice President).
This is why so many of our current events are so important:
1) each state is allowed to have their own methodology: plurality (first to 51%), proportional (aligned with popular vote) ranked choice, etc. This is why these “popular vote pact” states matter, they are allowed to put in systems that can result in minority vote as winners.
2) the census matters in not only correctly allocating members of Congress, but also the State proportion in the Electoral College. When we see “such and such Midwest states should have +1 Rep” that also means in the Presidental elections.
3) Jan 6th matters in certifying the electoral vote result. If there is an issue with the vote, it must be brought up here to Congress.
4) voting districts matter (jerrmandering) . Electors DON’T have to be linked to the “democratic” popular vote, even today. Historically, the State Legislatures would nominate electors directly. This made voting for your State Senator much more important, with a much stronger “local” link from citizen to State. When the 17th Amendment changed how Federal Senators were nominated, many states switched to popular vote schemes as well, taking responsibility / liability away from the State Senators. The States still set the rules on how local votes are counted towards the Federal electoral congress, which is why it’s so important to get better local candidates who want to fix the voting laws.
Thank PS
I am still puzzled.
How is it when the White House has a Republican President and majorities in the houses, who makes his wishes known, and is elected (not by the public obviously) but by some other college method.
Why is it then that seemingly any body with enough money, can find a corrupt so called judge to run the country
and override the government.
My question is what is the point of elections? Just let these judges make all the laws.
It would save a lot of time and money wasted on elections.
Greed, leads back to Original Sin
I still can’t STAND Woodrow Wilson! I’m not fond of FDR or LBJ either!
SPIT!
You are correct. They were three disasters.
3) Jan 6th matters in certifying the electoral vote result. If there is an issue with the vote, it must be brought up here to Congress.
January 6 2021 was the date that Biden, Pelosi, and the deep state conspired against President Trump in the J6 fedsurrection. The real reason for Pelosi’s emergency was to halt the January 6 process of certification of the Electoral College votes. Rep. Clay Higgins said that there were more than 200 federal assets and ghost walkers involved in the J6 crowd–that tore down the barricades, restricted area signs, and more. And nobody talks about the 13 antifa-style agitator groups in the J6 crowd including Antifa and neo-Nazi groups like Atomwaffen Division and Stormfront. And if that wasn’t enough there was the J6 fed pipe bomber who used a key card hundreds of times to park in DOJ/FBI garages.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/11/rep-clay-higgins-drops-bomb-newsmax-200-fbi/
It was all a conspiracy so that Pelosi could declare an emergency session on J6 to preclude the efforts of the states who planned to challenge Biden’s fraudulent electors. Legislatures in Pennsylvania, Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, and others sent letters to Congress similar to the letter from Arizona stating, “based upon the clear and convincing nature of the evidence [of illegality and fraud], we respectfully ask that you recognize our desire to reclaim Arizona’s Electoral College Electors and block the use of any Electors from Arizona until such time as the controversy is properly resolved through the pending litigation or a comprehensive forensic audit.” In a January 4 letter, 21 members of the Pennsylvania Senate, including the powerful president pro tem of the Senate, outlined the numerous instances of violations of state law by state election officials and even the judiciary in the conduct of Pennsylvania’s election, thereby usurping the sole power that the Legislature has pursuant to Article II of the federal constitution to determine the manner for choosing presidential electors. Because of those illegal actions, the Senators noted “that PA election results should not have been certified” and asked that the Congress “delay certification of the Electoral College to allow due process as we pursue election integrity in our Commonwealth.”
So the feds’ riot insured that an emergency was declared that prevented these states from requesting VP Pence to allow them to investigate the election fraud and violations of the Constitution. This was the final step in the feds’ coup to end democracy by taking down President Trump and installing FJB into the White House with his 81 million fraudulent ballots.
Next citizen Donald Trump was impeached a second time for allegedly inciting J6. Then 3 days after Donald Trump announced his candidacy for 2024, unconstitutional special counsel Jack Smith was appointed and tried to imprison President Trump with a 37 count indictment, staging a FBI gestapo raid on Mar-a-Lago along the way.
It seems to me the tariffs are not the error, it’s the IEEPA authority apparently used as their underpinning. And the problem is the relevant section in the IEEPA that deals with a president’s authority doesn’t cover the laying of tariffs. (I’ve read it.) I wonder if they can be reworked under one of several pieces of law over the years where Congress ceded their authority to the President, just in case SCOTUS shafts the electorate again.
Breitbart Business Digest: The Supreme Court Just Torpedoed the Legal War on Tariffs
https://www.breitbart.com/economy/2025/06/27/breitbart-business-digest-the-supreme-court-just-torpedoed-the-legal-war-on-tariffs/
Thank you for that If the Court maintains its broadened viewpoint – and I don’t see Kagan moving off an opinion under her name – then they (the tariffs) would likely stand. Well, as Pres. Trump would say, “We’ll see.” Thanks again.
My concern: if POTUS and Bessent laid out the case for the known precarious state of our economy (my assumed reason for the use of IEEPA) this could cause a negative impact overall for the nation.
We all know that if the people believe that things are a hair’s breadth away from a new Great Depression, the flow of money would likely stop or move to a trickle at best.
POTUS needs the money to continue to flow at a reasonable pace in order for the transition to solid ground to occur.
This may be one of the reason’s for the lawfare in the first place: force this Administration to show the cards in order to scare the public and cause a catastrophe.
By the way: the cards show the devastation the Biden Admin brought to our economy…..I think they were hoping to tank it before Trump took office.
May the plans of the enemies of our nation be foiled, in Jesus’ name, Amen.
While it could be argued that the tariffs to stop the fentanyl trade were a response to a national emergency, the claim that 40 years of de-industrialization effected by free trade constitute an emergency is harder to make. Emergencies are generally of limited duration. President Trump recently knowledged that a better solution would be for Congress to authorize his tariff policy. But, he pointed out, we don’t have 60 votes in the Senate.
Still let’s hope that the Supreme Court finds adequate precedent to acknowledge the emergency.
Concur RE the temp nature of an emergency, within the context of the IEEPA. But I don’t think he needs the Senate. As I mentioned there are existing laws which could’ve underpinned his laying of tariffs; laws done by Congress that ceded their “power” to him. Again, we’ll see.
Why do you think emergencies are of limited duration? They go on for decades.
FYI the 1979 Declaration of Emergency by President Jimmy Carter over the Iran Hostage situation is STILL IN EFFECT.
I’ll see your 40 years and raise you six more.
President Trump and his team have far too much work fixing the mess they inherited going back years but especially the term of president Biden to be worrying about the Ukraine-Russia conflict and expending time and resources needed at home on the futile war. This applies to other distant foreign military engagements. They are right in wanting to get their own house in order before looking to see if they can assist in sensible ways overseas. They can set an example in restoring law and order where crime has been rampant, replace illegal immigration with proper vetting, promoting hard work and small businesses, stop favoring the huge monopolies, reduce energy costs by sensible actions not an alarmist reaction. This will force many countries to trade fairly and stop depending on aid.
These continued delays should anger every American patriot into action. 2026 Election , primaries…reform, all of it
It is time to stop asking. It time to start telling the courts that their ignorance of the Constitution will no longer be tolerated, or their edicts obeyed, period.
I didn’t vote this Radical lib judges ,stop been interfering President Trump JOB.
I wonder how much this judge are getting paying from Globalism and Greedy Corporations,
Five out of the 15 main judges on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia were born outside the United States. Federal Judges are given lifetimes appointments. It is time to require that all Federal judges must be natural-born citizens, not foreign born and naturalized.
Lawyers’ education also needs to be drastically revamped. My understanding is that it focuses mostly case law (precedents) and very little on the Constitution. We all see this daily. Until that happens, there won’t be any significant change.
It’s a shame we don’t control Congress. Between sending subpoenas to judges and their ability to simply pass a one sentence bill validating the President’s authority, this is an easily solved matter.
When is a majority not a majority?
for the FOLKS in the back: THEY HATE YOU!
And they’re greedy, and have bad things to hide!
I’m so old I remember when judges were not identified by the president who nominated them.
me too. david barton wrote a book called ‘The Myth of Separation’. illustrates how everything went south when prayer was taken out of schools.
BINGO!!! WINNER, WINNER, CHICKEN DINNER!!!
Judges have been political hacks since John Marshall’s nakedly political decision on Marbury vs Madison in 1803.
SD and all, Is it true that if the ruling on tarriff’s are not in PDT favor our economy crashes?
How much more damage can occur between now and when SCOTUS decides the case?
How much do you think? Plenty, I’ll wager!
Economy crashes and PDJT loses his leverage over other countries. It will be catastrophic IMO
“Tariffs” are a fundamental part of import/export throughout the planet. Every country imposes them. The “list of tariffs” that Trump once trotted out represented fifty percent of what we are right now paying.
Stopping these tariffs is in the best interests of the globalist agenda. They are the culprit sponsors for the legal fees supporting this litigation. There are so many ways they can funnel the money through mazes to the petitioners. Remember destroying our economy and middle class is a goal to get their totalitarian control. Our courts are obviously falling victim and self exposing themselves as illegitimate in their findings. This is on full display for the American citizenry to see. Let the sunshine work.
Using courts to advance a tyrannical political agenda is disgusting- that’s exactly what one expects from the left.
‘Political genius lies in extracting success even from the people’s ruin.’
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
The Left long to rule the ashes…
It is clear that President Trump can issue tariffs. As previous President have done so using Congressional Laws that exist today. There is no reason for the Judges to block Trump and for Trump to follow the blocks.
Yeah, I wish he’d just ignore them, but I do understand PDJT’s reasons for doing it, so called, “legally”!
I think that the “No Kings” people expected him to follow in the footsteps of Jackson and Lincoln long before now – but he hasn’t. Instead, he is appealing through the Judicial system, and thereby forcing that system to confront itself. The SCOTUS does not like the increased case load. But this is what must happen: we have only one President, not four hundred. And the same Judiciary which is right now doing this incessantly must be made to confront itself.
Remember that Thomas Jefferson (Marbury vs. Madison) commented that the courts have NO enforcement power, and if they did, it would mean that an act of suicide for the new republic would be committed.
If the president refused to enforce a judgment, then it was up to the voters to remove him in the next election, if they agreed with the court!
The quick twitch
dem-ist folks in dc
love to have someone bite on a baited trap ( to snap an impeachment discussion – which the biased media would amplify ( again ).
Sadly, even though there are judges that proverbially are missed used by politicians to throw sand in the gears
it is best to have the lawyer$ chat it out in increasingly higher courts.
[ and they are replaceable too ]
( and yes, the courts have no law enforcement. The courts rely on people to respect court rulings.
But there is
a check and balance on court people. So if voters do not like biased impeachment, the people could use higher integrity elections – spaced 2, 4. 6 years apart – to sssslowly update the check and balances
( replace people – hopefully with more lawful people).
Love thy neighbors
Federal judges anonymously criticize Supreme Court for overturning decisions with emergency rulings
One judge received death threats for rulings countering Trump’s agenda, predicts ‘somebody is going to die’
Faux “News”
Too many judges are partisan hack politicians in black robes.
To delay is to deny…
Crap weasels!
The lawyers representing the President and Office of the President also need to ask for a stay on the 14 October deadline, pending Supreme Court Ruling, set by the Federal Court of Appeals, for tariffs to be lifted.
I can see Chief Justice Roberts, the supervisor of the Federal Court of Appeals, slow rolling the hearing just to allow the 14 October deadline to hit … forcing the President to remove the tariffs which would kick off another parallel storm in the Federal Court of Appeals as Nations and Businesses attempt to claw back the Tariffs they paid.
Stay with the comment s. Get the dang case for prosecuting the 2020 stolen election going now, get the Biden pen case in the prompt and seek nullification of everything those treasonous rat bastardos did.
DOJ you get that accomplished at Warp Speed and all these ludicrous rulings start diminishing in effect. God willing this is already in the works. 🙏🏽😎
They have to stop the lower courts attempts to seize control of our government.
That’s their purpose…Stop Trump from being President. It shouldn’t wait until November. These people can’t have a legitimate argument.
Biden suspended NTR (Normal Trade Relations) with Russia and moved them to column 2 of the HTSUSA, ie the tariff schedule. Column 2 carries high duty rates, 80%. 100%. Higher even.
This is authorized under the Trade Act of 1974 Title IV, sec 401.
Of course the Treasury Sec must be aware of this. So, I think plan B would be to simply suspend NTR and move recalcitrant countries to column 2. Recall that China was under column 2 until around 1979, when they got MFN (Most Favorited Nation) status.
Why didn’t Biden revoke tariffs while in office?
Why were there no activist judges blocking tariffs when Biden was president?