Today, FBI Director Christopher Wray will face questions about the FBI role in the attempted assassination of President Trump and their investigation in the aftermath.
To date, despite the significance of the event, no official press conference with the heads of Secret Service, Dept of Homeland Security or the FBI have taken place. There have been ZERO official press conference where USSS, DHS or FBI would answer questions. In the absence of this protocol, which is intentionally missing, congress has stepped into the role of the media and trying to get answers. It’s all sketchy; all of it.
Director Wray appears before the House Judiciary Committee today at 10:00am. Unfortunately, given the long history of the FBI claiming they cannot speak due to never-ending ongoing investigations, I do not anticipate much substantive progress. We are all very frustrated. Livestream Links Below.
.
.
.
.
Bongino on his show today sure seems to be calling out someone within the government to come forward, implying they know the truth. He basically challenges him/her to be strong and come forward and speak.
He also warns this person that they would be coming for him/her next.
The way Bongino says all this seems to imply he knows exactly who this person is.
The potential reality is if this person is real, he/she could possibly bring down the entire “evil empire” if they indeed have hard evidence of a true conspiracy to murder a US President along with additional charges of murder and attempted murder of 2 other US citizens.
We are in Grown up Land. Think of how many we know that are currently dead.
Any whistle blowers, need to keep their whistle quiet and just surive and undermind from within legally.
I believe you posted link yesterday – would you mind sharing link again please?
It’s about 30 minutes into here: https://rumble.com/v5895kl-troubling-new-video-shows-why-the-secret-service-is-hiding-the-timeline-ep..html
And I listened until I found it because it was intriguing what Bogeyfree mentioned. Sounds a lot like some things Patrick Byrne has been saying, about trying to reach some honest (he is more optimistic than I am) people still in the government; I wonder if it is related.
If they have the backbone, and a true love of America.
I think he is talking directly to a person or persons that know he knows what they know. What the precise import of that is remains to be seen
He’s been saying this for a few days, and it seems he’s talking to someone(s) specifically. Hopefully, they’re lawyering up and getting security in place to open the floodgates.
I listened to his podcast again. He is speaking directly to one person.
He warned, you’re next. They are going to come for you.
Who would know more than the lead advance on the Butler Rally, coincidentally the job that he did?
What an embarrassment. Who writes the scripts for the demonrats? Can’t anyone just ask questions instead of reading off a script?
its about soundbites. the puppet handlers hand them scripts for Echo Agency circulation
Honestly, I have come to believe that they are all following a script- even the people on the “right” side. Our guys ask tough questions and get the good sound bites but nothing ever happens. Somehow they are always powerless to affect any change after the mighty grilling at the hearing. It’s all just a show. All of it.
Damn! Did he get triggered by the 1/6 questions, or what?
BIGLY!
Yeah, he knows J6 was set up and the Pipe bomber was a FBI agent, they have the videos showing cops, Capitol police, FBI entrapping people and violently trying to harm the protesters by shooting rubber bullets directly toward the face, throwing flash bang grenades while the protesters were trapped and couldn’t escape.
McBath makes a pretty pig
I trust Wray as much as I trust Fauci: ZERO!
Bullet Proof Trump 2024.
———
Does this mean all shots fired have the casing accounted for by the body? meaning a casing is there for the SS sniper and Police Sniper shots? at the body of the boy?
I’m pretty sure thats wrong thinking on my part.. There is no way they’d frame the boy this stupidly.
You’ve obviously not heard the suit on the roof talking. He had it all figured out already. Just ask him.
Here’s an idea to save some $$$ Wray. Cancel all your b.s. FBI shows on the tubes. That should free up everyone on your team to concentrate on the job at hand. if they want to be Hollywood stars, they should resign.
Effing liar.
And end the J6 witch hunts. Liar!
Wow! I’m very impressed with Christopher Wray!! He’s a much more polished liar than Kimberly Cheatle.
Repeatedly being hauled onto the congressional carpet to answer for his gross corruption has given him plenty of practice.
Machine Gun Cheatles doesn’t have the Bribery/Blackmail Operation that Wray does.
It makes him much more arrogant.
Psalm 58:
1-2 Is this any way to run a country?
Is there an honest politician in the house?
Behind the scenes you weave webs of deceit,
behind closed doors you make deals with demons.
3-5 The wicked crawl from the wrong side of the cradle;
their first words out of the womb are lies.
Poison, lethal rattlesnake poison,
drips from their forked tongues—
Deaf to threats, deaf to charm,
decades of wax built up in their ears.
6-9 God, smash their teeth to bits,
leave them toothless tigers.
Let their lives be buckets of water spilled,
all that’s left, a damp stain in the sand.
Let them be trampled grass
worn smooth by the traffic.
Let them dissolve into snail slime,
be a miscarried fetus that never sees sunlight.
Before what they cook up is half-done, God,
throw it out with the garbage!
Yes and Amen!
When responding to Rep. Dan Bishop…
What does “given the sheer nature of it” actually mean? So…what IS the nature of it? (The unanswered question…) @atensnut
– did you notice this very obscure evasion?
Herr Direktor Wray is a POS Gangster Bullshitter, a #ProfessionalLiar and reprobate killer, practiced in padding his answers to eat up the clock and sound like he’s saying something when he’s not.
Orwell:
“The great enemy of clear language is insincerity. When there is a gap between one’s real and one’s declared aims, one turns as it were instinctively to long words and exhausted idioms, like a cuttlefish spurting out ink.”
“[The English language] becomes ugly and inaccurate because our thoughts are foolish, but the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts…”
“But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought. A bad usage can spread by tradition and imitation even among people who should and do know better. The debased language that I have been discussing is in some ways very convenient. Phrases like a not unjustifiable assumption, leaves much to be desired, would serve no good purpose, a consideration which we should do well to bear in mind, are a continuous temptation, a packet of aspirins always at one’s elbow. Look back through this essay, and for certain you will find that I have again and again committed the very faults I am protesting against. By this morning’s post I have received a pamphlet dealing with conditions in Germany. The author tells me that he “felt impelled” to write it. I open it at random, and here is almost the first sentence I see: “[The Allies] have an opportunity not only of achieving a radical transformation of Germany’s social and political structure in such a way as to avoid a nationalistic reaction in Germany itself, but at the same time of laying the foundations of a co-operative and unified Europe.” You see, he “feels impelled” to write — feels, presumably, that he has something new to say — and yet his words, like cavalry horses answering the bugle, group themselves automatically into the familiar dreary pattern. This invasion of one’s mind by ready-made phrases (lay the foundations, achieve a radical transformation) can only be prevented if one is constantly on guard against them, and every such phrase anaesthetizes a portion of one’s brain.”
“The words democracy, socialism, freedom, patriotic, realistic, justice, have each of them several different meanings which cannot be reconciled with one another. In the case of a word like democracy, not only is there no agreed definition, but the attempt to make one is resisted from all sides. It is almost universally felt that when we call a country democratic we are praising it: consequently the defenders of every kind of régime claim that it is a democracy, and fear that they might have to stop using the word if it were tied down to any one meaning. Words of this kind are often used in a consciously dishonest way.”
“Political speech and writing are largely the defence of the indefensible. Things like the continuance of British rule in India, the Russian purges and deportations, the dropping of the atom bombs on Japan, can indeed be defended, but only by arguments which are too brutal for most people to face, and which do not square with the professed aims of political parties. Thus political language has to consist largely of euphemism, question-begging and sheer cloudy vagueness.”
“Political language – and with variations this is true of all political parties, from Conservatives to Anarchists – is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.”
― George Orwell, Politics and the English Language
Winston Smith: “Does Big Brother exist?”
O’Brien: “Of course he exists.”
Winston Smith: “Does he exist like you or me?”
O’Brien: “You do not exist.”
Rest in the Vine: Chris Wray and his Orwell Eon
Sigh……
Another recess.😡
Because…ya know…listening to Netanyahu
is sooooo much more important. 🤢 🤢 🤢
Reminds me of a mother in law who insists
on not canceling a visit, just days after a
tornado hits your house. Audacity.
😡 😡 😡 Priorities…priorities.
America First appears not to be a priority for
those on the Hill.
Sad….
Considering Netanyahu, Israel, and the potential for WWIII breaking out in the ME….to include the latest cries of “Iran, Iran, Iran” re: PDJT’s assassination attempt….personally I am inclined to give the capital hill folks a pass for want to hear what Bibi says…
…to say nothing of the fact that Wray is inarguably thoroughly untrustworthy and a pawn of the Deep State.
So they can’t beat him, they can’t kill him, WWIII here we come.
They have to show up, listen,
and give a certain number of
claps and ovations.
😊 if they don’t— their AIPAC
handler will report it. Donations
to campaign funds will stop.
Listen to Wray’s tone and look at his body language. He doesn’t care at all that presidential nominee was almost murdered, and that a US citizen was shot and killed at a rally. His microexpressions show defiance, condescension, annoyance at being there
https://truthsocial.com/@JackPosobiec/112841982300006051
It is obvious they do not care. They will never give President Trump respect as even a former President. They hate us just as much.
when was Project 2025 set up? it sure feels like its only value was to provide an attack angle on President Trump if the assassination failed.
They are trying to saddle President Trump with something similar to Agenda 2030 or Agenda 21 as it used to be called.
Steve Bannon had the Project 2025 folks on frequently. That is why they jailed him and that is why they are talking it up. It’s just a hammer they use to scare people. President Trump said he had no knowledge of it and he wants to keep it that way, so they don’t badger him on it since he had nothing to do with it. He can know about it when the time is right, and pick and choose if he wants to use any of it or none, just like any other President does.
Jack Cashill has asked people to pick out things in P2025 that scare them and he will address them immediately, publicly and truthfully. So far all they have brought him are lies they heard which he has dispelled quite rapidly with truth.
If you are an animal of the swamp, of course you are afraid that your job is going bye bye. You should not have job security anymore than any of the rest of us. There are WAY TOO MANY NON ESSENTIALS in gubt.
Public servant is B.S. NONE of them serve us.
Can you find any evidence that Steve Bannon interviewed Project 2025 people? I can’t find any.
Really? Where did you look?
“Why?” – Mr. C. Lyon
https://rumble.com/search/all?q=%22Project%202025%22%20%2B%20%22War%20Room%22
BTW, one of these headlines, from Alex Jones, says President Trump was tricked into disavowing P2025. That is b.s. too.
The same b.s. was also spouted by Robert Barnes.
The truth is what I said above. The P25 comes from a think tank of sorts. President Trump is not involved and he is smart to stay that way. He has learned in the last nine years not to fight the battles he’s not in. Let others do that for him. He’ll be happy to take a look when the time is right, and that time will come soon.
If you want even more on P2025, try this too:
https://rumble.com/search/video?q=%22Project%202025%22
The wikipedia entry (most of which is anti-Trump garbage) says this:
Project 2025 was established in 2022 to provide the 2024 Republican presidential nominee with a personnel database and ideological framework (…)
The citation for the 2022 claim is a New York Times article written by Trump-hater Maggie Haberman, but the article actually doesn’t support the claim. The article was published on April 20 2023. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/20/us/politics/republican-president-2024-heritage-foundation.html
According to my search, the project was published on April 21 2023. A day after the Haberman article? If that date is correct it might lead people (me!) to think they contacted her to publish an article about it.
At least Haberman admits that the project is not tied specifically to Trump:
If a Republican enters the Oval Office in 2025, whether it’s Donald J. Trump or someone else, there is a good chance that president will turn to the same electronic database to staff the White House and federal agencies.
I’m wondering if Trump shunned the Heritage Foundation for his 2024 run and this was their way of getting back at him. Maybe I’m wrong but I think they were quite involved with helping Trump choose his first term cabinet and Supreme Court picks. I need to do some research on that to be sure.
About Haberman, this will make everyone vomit:
Haberman, a veteran reporter for the Times, is well known across the world of media and politics for her reporting on the former president. She was part of the team that won a 2018 Pulitzer Prize for its reporting on Trump’s connections to Russia
Maybe the Heritage Foundation needs to butt out of things.
Project 2025 was not written by President Trump or President Trump’s team.
Yep
They mention that on their website.
They announce themselves.
https://www.project2025.org/truth/
The FIB knows the most minor details of Jan 6 protestors, convicting and imprisoning thousands for many years. But struggles about details of the attempted assassination of President Trump.
Capitol Violence — FBI
Professional liars avoid giving details they may have to recall at a future date.
FBI said MLK was assassinated by a white supremacist.
They arrested Ray on his way back from Africa.
EXCLUSIVE: MLK’s Niece Reflects on Trump Assassination Attempt, Readiness to Serve
https://headlineusa.com/mlk-niece-reflect-trump-assassination/
It is beyond obvious that elements inside USSS were in on the attempted murder of PDJT.
We are in a very dangerous place right now.
Yes.
Hanlon’s Razor, which states “Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by incompetence”, does NOT apply in the absence of demonstrable goodwill effort….which itself was utterly lacking in every way in this instance.
I’ve been thinking about Sundance’s comments on absent republicans. To borrow from the wicked witch of the east, “what difference does it make”. I only say that because if they were there to answer tough questions then he wouldn’t answer.
We all know Crooks had some help with either someone inside the government or close ties (contractor). PDJT can answer/find out who suggested, when it was suggested and why the date for Butler, PA — it’s either that person or that person spoke with some one.
Do we expect our abusive government to give us open, non-pretending answers? I suggest NO, so why not focus of getting PDJT elected.
We need PDJT elected to buy some time. He won’t be able to fix everything, but he can sure fix a lot and slow down other agendas.
The solution is still at the local and state level. Fixing these areas over the next many election cycles will eventually trickle up. The Dems didn’t take over the federal agencies overnight, nor can they be turned around overnight.
The last two paragraphs are bang-on, in my opinion.
“President Trump needs to go through these departments like Grant through Richmond”
https://rumble.com/v53rbvr-rep.-tim-burchett-suggests-trump-should-dismantle-federal-agencies.html
Please ask Director Wray and all of the others (USSS, HSI, DHS, FBI, DOJ, etc.) you are questioning:
“WHEN did the White House know that Judge Cannon was dismissing Jack Smith and the entire sham docs case? And WHO knew?”
Assassination Attempt = Saturday PM
Jack Smith and Shame Docs Case Dismissed = Monday AM
Were they informed on Friday that this was coming?
RNC Convention also wired for a Haley/Pompeo or DeSantis ticket. And Vance would not have yet been named.
I remember reading that here at CTH, but I do not remember the source.
fwiw
JD Vance about the moment he got the call
FYI: Netanyahu will address Congress at 2:05 pm EST
There’s a mob, a huge protest march
Netanyahu about to address Congress:
The question to all the Federal and State agencies tasked with protecting DJT at the Butler rally needs to be rephrased to reflect the reality. The conversation should be, “Why was your agency complicit in allowing an assassination where an on target bullet was fired but missed because the intended target turned his head? There was no action from your agency to prevent that which indicates either complete total incompetence and/or purposeful constructed incompetence = being complicit. What is it? Your choice and don’t give the usual BS about an ongoing investigation because public evidence totally confirms the aforementioned.”
Roger Wil Co.
Trust God. Fear not.
What a country!
Chris Martenson is doing a great job on reviewing what evidence we have.
Its clear to me from the audio we have ‘three’ different firearms involved. The first three were likely from the actual hitman. They only barely missed PDJT because ‘he’ turned his head at just the right time. The next five were from the patsy “ie lone gun man” on the roof. The last one was used to take out the patsy.
Great info.
Further Analysis by these gentlemen indicates the Federal Assassins shot first, before Crooks:
Not sure what audio analysis people are pointing to but this analysis seems to question the original that this person originally agreed with. Get that? This substack analysis from Arngrimr contradicts the first one, so………
2nd https://arngrimr.substack.com/p/single-shooter-after-all
1st https://arngrimr.substack.com/p/forensic-audio-analysis-more-than
The CM video questions the different sounds of first 3 versus the 5 shots and I saw a video of a shooter demonstrating with a rifle how acoustics and echos can make the same rifle sound like a different one. No proof of anything there. Appears to me Crooks was careful with first three shots, thought he shot Trump or didn’t have a target and just started the rapid fire of a mass shooting before the SS got him.
If there are totally contradictory conclusions it means we don’t know yet, so let’s keep asking questions but not make unsubstantiated claims.
Chris has audio from many different recording locations in this and other videos.
All the recordings confirm nine shots and have the same ‘time’ spacing. Good luck repeating that with ‘echoes’. I’m sure with further analysis we could find the echoes as well, and then use them to determine the location of the sound origin.
From PDJT’s microphone we have the sonic shock wave of the first three bullet passing near the microphone ‘before’ the sound of the rifle. The next five and last one don’t have that same sonic signature at his microphone because these bullets likely passed to far away from his microphone to produce such a noticeable shockwave that the first three did.
Also the rate of fire is very different between the three groups of shots in addition to the overall sound from the closest audio location within the crowd to patsy (and likely the hitman) we have.
The first three sound like a semi-auto high powered sniper rifle. The second a full automatic AR-15. The third is either handgun shot from the second story window with a view of the gunman or further away from the Counter Sniper Team.
Even the sound signatures themselves will give a clue as to what firearm produced them.
One working theory, having watching many reviews of the ‘public’ evidence, is that the second story window/room was used by the hit team to keep track of the patsy’s progress, station the real hitman back from the window, all while enabling an easy ‘clean-up’ shot to takeout the patsy.
The first three sound like a semi-auto high powered sniper rifle. The second a full automatic AR-15
How many verified “semi auto high powered sniper rifles” have you listened to on a recording of someone shooting between buildings with open field around? None? Don’t feel bad, that’s probably everyone. Your hearing needs work if you hear the second set of 5 shots as fully automatic. To me they sound exactly like a SEMI-automatic firing as fast as you can pull the trigger. If you can count the shots it is not “fully auto”.
My analysis you may have missed, 3 careful shots by Crooks, he lost his target, he then just starts spraying as fast as he can. My “theory” fits the evidence and is supported by Arngrimr’s analysis but it doesn’t prove anything.
You really should read https://arngrimr.substack.com/p/single-shooter-after-all watch the 3d illustration and take to heart the paragraphs after.
good analysis
in this video, shooting starts around 8:55
to me, all the shots sound roughly similar, like they could all be from the same shooter
I’m aware of Martenson’s 2-shooter video, but he states I think that analysis can vary depending on the sound source
well, for me, this sound source all the shots sound roughly similar in character, in terms of the crack-thump sound
so I hear
1 … … 2 … … 3 … … … … 4 .. 5 .. 6 . 7 . 8 … … …
then a final 9th shot at 9:11, likely the counter-sniper shot that killed Crooks
LIVE: Shots Fired at Trump Rally in Butler, Pennsylvania (@8:55) (youtube.com)
Investigating a WDVE may or may not be traumatic, confusing, both, and more.
My opinion only.
Why Do Some People Think the Las Vegas Shooting was a Helicopter Attack?
https://rumble.com/vnfam3-why-do-some-people-think-the-las-vegas-shooting-was-a-helicopter-attack.html
From what I am hearing from the testimonies, every story seems to be different–I’m not talking eyewitness stories for that is commo in talking to eyewitnesses. . I’m talking about the difference found during the investigation. Its not like we just found this out, but what was found out. is different.
Has Wray been asked if any agents, CI, or anyone else under the government umbrella in communication with Crooks?
Director Ray should be FIRED! This whole thing smells! And the “protect thyself” through jibber jabber of this hearing.
The FBI had a drone watching the shooter. Instead of killing him immediately, they allowed him to go through this his (Or someone else’s) plan to kill President Trump. The Snipers should have shot and killed the shooter immediately. They knew he had the rifle. The shooter was on the roof for about an hour.
Between the FBI and the Secret Service, we all know that both agencies were NOT doing their jobs.
Why have a drone if you just “purposefully sit back, allow an assassination attempt to happen out in the open.
This is beyond a rotten smell test.
God Bless President Trump!
I watched the Congressional Hearing today as Christopher Wray was asked the question whether or not he noticed any Cognitive Degeneration in his many conversations with Crooked Joe Biden and, despite the fact that Special Counsel Robert Hur said, effectively, that Joe Biden is INCOMPETENT, with LITTLE MEMORY, etc., Wray said that “it is not something I observed during my interactions with him, which were uneventful and unremarkable,” essentially stating that he found nothing wrong, mentally or physically, with “Joe.” If that is the case, Director Wray should resign immediately from the FBI, and stop “sweet talking” Congress every time he goes up, which he loves to do, because anybody can see that Joe Biden is cognitively and physically challenged, and if you can’t see that, you sure as hell can’t be running the FBI – Unless, that is, you want to illegally lead the Raid on Mar-a-Lago. Wray has to resign, and NOW, for LYING TO CONGRESS!
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/112843245048191931
THANK YOU MR. VAN DREW!
A friend sent me the link below. Kim Clement died in 2016, but prophesied an assassination attempt “on a Saturday night” more than 10 years before died. At the time of the prophecy the VP was Dick Cheney? In another prophecy he warns of “Strange July, Strange July” and says by the Fall (November?) God will bring this Nation to its knees. Whether you buy into the whole prophecy thing or not, fear not fellow Treepers; God is in complete control and the outcome will be glorious.
all well and good
but was there anything in the “prophecy” to indicate he was envisioning 2024 specifically?
or is it impolite to expect specifics like that from a “prophecy”?
So, who was in charge of security at the rally? Or was nobody in charge?
It appears Kim fell on her sword. Unfortunately, the boy from Beverly Hills is her boss.
Build the apparatus of the state, get the apparatchiks of the state.
If you run a security business that gets people killed a lot, you might go out of business. If you run a business inside the administrative state, you can get away with murder and get promoted if you have plausible deniability.
Make Security Accountable Again
https://revolver.news/2024/05/meet-donell-harvin-trump-hating-deep-state-official-who-predicted-j6-pipe-bombs-in-advance/
There are reports that Crooks was probably a Volunteer assigned to cover the building. One of the Congressman said he bought the ladder before it was announced that Trump was having a rally in Butler. If so, no wonder he was ignored by Police. They knew him. See GeorgeWebb.substack.com
If it’s not reported it didn’t happen. It was reported he was jumping roof to roof.
He didn’t need a ladder climbing up the elevated position in the rear of the AGR complex.
https://rumble.com/v56vcnh-second-eyewitness-says-he-told-cops-about-trump-shooter-on-the-roof.html
Some of the expressions they catch this clown in and post on the web often makes me think he is about an order of fries short of a Happy Meal
Jim Jordan finally asks the question from ‘A Few Good Men’. If you said Iran is after President Trump Mr. Wray, why didn’t USSS upgrade his security?
It was like the bombing of Coventry. They didn’t want Iran to know that they knew.
Congress pass laws with consequences which make it illegal for heads of agencies under investigation to withhold information, while mocking the important Congressional investigation process with “under investigation” excuses. After Chevron, they lost their “interpretation”liberty to circumvent the letter of the law.