For his weekly monologue, Neil Oliver ponders the collapse of checks and balances. The framework of new democratic norms where the government ruling elite police themselves and their conscripts for violations created by their own conduct.
Encapsulated within the question, “Who guards the guards,” Oliver outlines the answer is not within the question. It is not a matter of watching the guards, it is now time for people throughout the west to change the guards and throw out the self-policing bums. WATCH:
[Transcript] – Who watches the watchers? Who guards the guards?
The question was posed by the Roman satirist Juvenal 2,000 years ago, but it has never been more relevant. It’s applied now to remind us of the need to keep a watchful eye on those in power.
This should be our paramount concern now, when lies and liars are everywhere.
This week, former PM Boris Johnson told the House of Commons privileges committee he had not lied when he told the House that his own Covid guidance was being followed in No.10.
Note the word guidance – made especially interesting by the fact ordinary members of the public were, as I seem to recall, arrested, charged and fined for sitting together on park benches or on the beach. I’m not sure that’s how guidance normally works.
In any event, I honestly don’t care whether he lied or not to parliament. I don’t care if they were having cake or coke. This is a red herring, a sleight of hand, a tactic to distract the gullible. The point that must neither be overlooked nor forgotten is that neither Johnson nor anyone else at those gatherings was demonstrably afraid of Covid.
We know that because we have seen the photos of them standing together without masks. Standing apart and wearing masks was for the little people. We might also assume that we were being laughed at by those who knew there was nothing to fear and therefore no reason not to party.
Keir Starmer’s Labour party was the same – we saw those pictures too. He and they called for earlier, longer, harder lockdowns and all the rest, and then met for curry and beer and cosy chats.
Fear was for the little people and so Left and Right, Blue and Red and all positions and team colours in between laughed up their sleeves as the nudge units and the paid propagandists told us anyone breaching the regulations – sorry, I mean guidance – was a granny killing Covidiot and Pandemic Denier.
Look me in the eye and tell me it wasn’t so.
So, who guards the guards, who watches the watchers?
Let’s notice, among much else, that this is the Commons sitting in judgment on the Commons, which is to say politicians sitting in judgement on politicians. This is the guards, judging the guards. This is the same Commons whose inhabitants worked together in unquestioning lockstep to impose policies that ruined lives, wrecked livelihoods and upended the economy. This is the same Commons that, far from accepting responsibility for the carnage, is actively seeking to have us look the other way while they get about the business of doing nothing more than playing politics, all they’re fit for, fiddling while Rome burns. The is the same Commons that empties when one of their own stands to speak up on behalf of people killed or harmed by medical products pushed as vaccines. And trust me, I’ll get back to that safe and effective nonsense they pushed in a moment.
We never quite got to mandated jabs for all, but people all over the world were sacked for opting to live by the ideal of my body my choice, the notion enshrined in the Nuremberg Code that states that a person should at all times: “Have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching or other forms of constraint or coercion …”
We didn’t quite get to mandates for the jabs for the general population, but I say it was a damned close-run thing. I say they were itching to mandate the vaccines. I say mandates weren’t pushed across the line in the end because enough of us made plain it would mean civil disobedience if not full-on civil war. I maintain that while they’ve gone quiet about lockdowns and face-masks, it can only be a matter of time before that playbook is brought out for the next crisis they can cook up. More and more are queuing up to distance themselves from the harms done during the last three years, while still priapic on account of all that unbridled power over the everyday lives of the tax-paying public.
Who watches the watchers, who guards the guards?
There are calls for a war crimes trial for Putin. What about a war crimes trial for Tony Blair while we’re at it? We hit the 20th anniversary of his unlawful war in Iraq last week – that unlawful war that led to over a million deaths, that destabilised the entire region to this day and gave birth to Isis. Wouldn’t the moral way to mark that birthday be a war crimes trial for all the people who took us there? And while we’re considering war crimes trials, shouldn’t we look again at precisely what successive United States administrations did in Korea, in Vietnam, and more recently in Libya, and in Syria and in Afghanistan and other sovereign nation-states too numerous to mention? Shouldn’t we look at what was done, and by whom?
US libertarian think tank the Cato Institute recently looked again at the behaviour of successive US presidents in relation to the Saudi Arabian horror show in Yemen. They reported, and suggested the appropriateness of war crimes trials for Barack Obama, Donald Trump and Joe Biden:
“Whose administrations serviced the US-provided warplanes, supplied munitions used to bomb weddings, funerals, schools.
“Whose administrations serviced the US-provided warplanes, supplied munitions used to bomb weddings, funerals, school buses and other civilian targets, gave intelligence used for targeting and for a time refuelled Saudi and Emirati aircraft.”
“US officials could not claim to be surprised at their culpability,” they added. “The state department warned that they could be held responsible for war crimes.”
“George W Bush is another good candidate for a trial on his aggressive unjustified attack on Iraq based on manipulated and fabricated intelligence. His war ended up killing hundreds of thousands of civilians as well as triggering years more of conflict. Former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair today spending his golden years profiting after acting as Bush’s poodle would be an appropriate co-conspirator.”
Who watches the watchers, who guards the guards?
We are trained to fear Global warming … the warming of the planet … while that world burns still on account of the fire Tony Blair helped light in the Middle East with UK taxpayer-funded missiles and bombs.
Who watches the watchers, who guards the guards?
Let’s look again at the banks and the simmering chaos there … in that world in which banks are secretive, privately owned businesses, in which central banks have the power to create money out of thin air and lend the same sums over and over and over again while growing fatter and fatter on more and more interest and debt. Another former PM, Gordon Brown traded on and perpetuated a myth of being a safe pair of hands when it came to money matters. This is the same Gordon Brown who sold off half of the UK’s gold reserves at a knockdown price so low it was remembered ever after as the Brown Bottom and one of the worst deals in recorded history.
In 2008 Brown bailed out the banks with billions and billions of pounds worth of our money and those banks duly stayed open, the bankers kept getting their bonuses and nothing changed when it came to stopping their reckless games with fantasy money. We were sold down the river and now the banks are shaking on their fantasy foundations once again and for more of the same reasons.
Who watches the watchers, who guards the guards?
The MHRA – the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency is supposed to monitor the information we get about health and the safety and effectiveness of the drugs we are offered. But the MHRA gets 86 percent of its funding from the pharmaceuticals industry. Is that the recipe for unbiased behaviour always and only in the interests of the people? I’m only asking.
It’s the same the world over: 65 percent of the US Federal Drugs Administration comes from Big Pharma. Between 2006 and 2019, nine out of 10 FDA Commissioners went on to secure jobs with pharmaceutical companies. 89 percent of the European Medicines Agency funding comes from Big Pharma. 96 percent of the funding for the Therapeutic Goods Administration in Australia comes from Big Pharma. In Japan, the relevant agency gets 85 percent of its funding from Big Pharma.
No lesser publication than the British Medical Journal asked, in a headline over a recent article:
“From FDA to MHRA – are drug regulators for hire?’
Obviously, I couldn’t possibly say one way or the other. A recent report from Australia’s TGA – the Therapeutic Goods Administration – equivalent to our MHRA – a report made available only by a Freedom of Information Request – makes plain that in January 2021 it was known to anyone privy to Pfizer’s own data that the lipid nanoparticle was widely distributed all around the body.
All of this was known before the so-called vaccines were approved for injection into billions of human beings, from babies up. Those entrusted with our health care knew, in advance, that the tiny oily bubbles carrying the making of the toxic spike protein could and would go to brains, hearts, livers, ovaries, testes, everywhere, and they went right ahead and did it anyway.
Safe and effective they said, over and over and over. Misinformation, anyone?
If they were doing their jobs and reading reports like this, then Chris Whitty would have known, Patrick Vallance would have known, Antony Fauci would have known.
This information is out there now, in the public domain, though heavily redacted – and God alone knows what remains redacted – and so why isn’t this front page and main TV news all around the world? Why not?
Who watches the watchers, who guards the guards?
The answer is as stark as it is depressing:
Westminster awards itself the power to make laws, enforce those laws and decree the punishment for any transgressions of those laws. This is a textbook definition of the tyranny that our constitution, enshrined in Magna Carta 1215, was specifically shaped to prevent. And yet here we are – with the watchers watching the watchers, the guards guarding the guards.
It is as obvious as Boris Johnson’s estrangement from the truth that this tyranny should never have been allowed to evolve and that, since it has, we must not tolerate it a moment longer.
Decisions of importance must be made by those with skin in the game, but with no means to profit either directly or indirectly from the decisions they come to.
Who guards the guards is a 2,000-year-old question. Older by 500 years is the Tao Te Ching, The Book of the Way, by Laozi, the Old Master.
Last week a friend reminded me of words that sound as though they might have been written this morning:
“When rich speculators prosper while farmers lose their land. When government officials spend money on weapons instead of cures. When the upper class is extravagant and irresponsible while the poor have nowhere to turn. All this is robbery and chaos.”
Robbery and chaos – that’s what our leaders and their little wizards have inflicted upon us. It was true two and a half thousand years ago and it’s still true now.
That old book also warns us about:
“Those who try to control, who use force to protect their power … They take from those who don’t have enough and give to those who have far too much.”
This is how we will beat them, how we will win – by remembering what our ancestors learned long ago and finally, finally doing something about it.
Here’s the thing: it’s long past time to watch the guards. What we need, all over the West and once and for all, is a changing of the guards.
I’ve heard it another way … who will protect us from our protectors?
Who? Not those in power in DC.
It is TIME to #Restore_the_Constitution
It is TIME to #DownSize_DC !
Who watches the watchers?
“Those who try to control, who use force to protect their power … They take from those who don’t have enough and give to those who have far too much.”
Says it all.
I look forward to Neil Olivers commentary every week.
He is a treasure & those who don’t know this ought to know better.
GOD bless us all~!
Neil Sage of Scots is indeed a treasure!
Heaven help us to change our guards.
There’s nothing more Inflationary and Ineffective than a massive “Intelligence Community.”
If we take Inflation as the result of non-productive enterprises (or receivers) which add to the Demand but they don’t add to the Supply of useable goods; things become much more expensive.
Ineffectually – throughout the History of Western Civilization espionage was rightly disparaged (that’s why spies don’t have the rights of citizens and can be sent to places like GITMO, or in war they’re not covered under the Geneva Convention) because it creates an ever compounding exercise in futility. It’s the undeniable reality of social contacts and a limitless objective combined with a strategic mission incorporating highly suspect anything-goes philosophies such as “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” or “using double agents” (how do we know they’re not triple agents?). All of it operating in the shadows. Thus everything is in place for the “Intelligence” culture to inevitably become very corrupt and pervasive.
Also there’s the whole ballooning phenomena of the 10’ fence – 11’ ladder, 11’ fence – 12’ ladder, and so on. The whole thing has always been considered utterly ridiculous. Basically you have your society creating spies and not goods and services.
There’s only one valid reason for modern espionage. That’s to detect First Strike Nuclear Capability (or any other weapon of First Strike Total Destruction). All the rest is a complete farce, but it does make for a really good (and extremely zealous) political constituency. It’s zealous because it can be. Our Rights were trampled in its creation so it leverages that against anything which threatens its preservation.
All this stuff flows down hill as predictably as water into a pond, or should I say swamp.
The society needs a certain amount of goods & services to stay in price equilibrium. If you add non-productive workers (and recipients) they’re not adding anything; you have the same amount of goods & services with more money demanding them (the goods and services have become scarce). Then when you compound this with the fact that their government job probably makes things more difficult to produce then you can start to see why things become much more expensive; I say start because in a massive society you’re going to have the snowballing effects of market psychology and momentum to contend with also. Plus synergistic effects like continuing to add to the Money Supply – which they’re still doing until Interest Rates equal the Inflation Rate.
I can’t imagine anything more Inflationary than a government using Monetary Policy to fight its own people tooth & nail.
As far as spying on us and their involvement in politics:
Of course they do, we make soft targets. They’re apprehensive to spy on other countries, other countries are full of the same assets. Also they need to be careful about the network, they’re all colleagues (like the international banking network). That’s part of the whole futility of Spy v. Spy and another of the many reasons why espionage was always looked down on until the Nuclear Age. There was only one valid reason for modern espionage. That was to detect First Strike Nuclear Capability.
Also, it’s impossible to have a large “Intelligence Community,” to many eyeballs and mouths. It’s more of a Public Relations Organization for the government. That explains them Leaking like a sieve. The whole thing’s ridiculous.
The NSA for instance was a pure 911 farce; since by far the most effective counter-terrorism measure that could have been implemented was to tighten immigration and travel visas, and not rely on foreign labor; that would be something concrete. Until you’ve done something concrete like that at the stratospheric level all the rest is nothing but a joke.
The Nuclear Age made war obsolete; leaving an unrealistic chance for First Strike Total Destruction – against Massive Retaliation and mutually assured destruction. In spite of that, it also left a manifestly critical obligation for vigilance off the battlefield because the stakes are so high due to the lethal nature of modern technology.
Unfortunately this has functioned as a green light for wimpy people to go nudging and pushing others through the amalgamation of the State.
The arrival of the Nuclear Age was the greatest break from the past the world has ever seen. It’s much more than a scientific revolution it spawned a cultural revolution too. Everything about it bends towards corruption. This is why people say that it made life breathlessly more complicated. We’re just starting to grapple with it now because the theft of the 2020 Election has made the symptoms acute.
“Who watches the watchers?”
In America, the answer the Founders had in mind was people exercising their 2nd Amendment RIGHT. But, seeing how resistant even the members of this forum are to the idea of exercising that right to save the Republic, we seem to have forgotten that. In the UK, they gave up the right to own guns a long time ago. So I’m not sure there is a viable answer that works for them. Unless it’s an outside country that ultimately saves them from Tyranny … like we did in WW2.
Bac,.Respectfully, I disagree.
The Founders gave us the 10th amendment, which clearly lays the responsibility for seeing to it that the Fed Govt does not encroach beyond the LIMITED powers enumerated.
All other powers, not enumerated, are retained by the States and the People.
Therefore, when the Fed. Govt attempts to encroach on powers reserved to the States and People, isn’t it obvious it is the States and People that should push back on such encroachment, not by “taking up arms” but by simply saying “No”, and backing that “No” up, if necessary by State A.G.’s challenging it in SCOTUS?
But, our State Gov’s, and our parents and grandparents did NOT challenge Federal overreach, instead they took the Fed. $ ,..a ‘bribe,’ of sorts, and the ILLUSION of “security” from some manufactured crises.
The good news is this path remains open to us; States violated Federal law, and “legalised” marajiuana, and put aside how you may feel about that, those States DID tell the Fed Govt. (in effect) “You have NO Constitutional authority to “regulate” or “prohibit” substances, and if we go to SCOTUS over it, you will lose.
And the Feds backed down, because they knew they WOULD lose.
Fed Gov has a list of drugs that are “Drs Rx only” but one State has made Ivermectine OTC, and the Feds haven’t done anything about this blatant ignoring of Federal law/regulation.
Two States, Texas and Utah have public schools that do not have “gun free zones” because it’s not ACTUALLY a Federal mandate; they knew if they made it one, it would be challenged on 10th amendment grounds and thrown out, so they “left it to the States”, just as PDJT left Covid policy to the States, and just as Brandon’s campaign promised “National mask mandate” ONLY applied on Federal property, because he and Fed Gov have NO authority other than Fed property and mass transit.
Have to take off my shoes to count my guns, and I love the 2A, but I love the 10th, even more!
Hate the 17th and the 22, tho.
The first is backed by the second and the second supersedes the the tenth, when the tenth does not work. The second supersedes the SCOTUS when the court tries to take action that is unconstitutional. It requires an intelligent and courageous electorate to see and act when needed.
The Constitution predates the idea that SCOTUS gets to do “judicial review”and decide authoritatively what is and what is not Constitutional.
You That construct came from SCOTUS itself in the Marburg v Madison decision.
The reason the 2nd is far more important than the 10th in both rank and effectiveness is that it is exercised by the individual citizen whereas the 10th requires elected state officials to do the right thing. Unfortunately, that is complicated by stolen elections and Governors, AGs and State Representatives being encouraged to act against State and citizen interests by Federal authorities through bribes and threats, effectively using Federal funds to control State actors.
Sure we can support radical federalism and I do, however, how does that work in Arizona now that they stole that election. It doesn’t. The 2nd does.
Praying for a Night of the Long Knives when patriots hunt down and purge the 50,000 conspirators. No quarter given. As Barry Goldwater said, extremism in the defense of liberty is not a vice.
“The Founders gave us the 10th amendment, which clearly lays the responsibility for seeing to it that the Fed Govt does not encroach beyond the LIMITED powers enumerated. All other powers, not enumerated, are retained by the States and the People.”
Yes, I know what the Constitution says. But how the UNIPARTY is interpreting it is just as important. The UNIPARTY has made a mockery of 10th Amendment and much of the rest of the Constitution.
All that’s left now, between us and 1984 style slavery, is the 2nd Amendment. You keep pretending that we control what the government does any more. We don’t. Countless times they’ve embarked on programs that the vast majority of the public don’t like or want. It isn’t as simple as saying “No”, and backing that “No” up, when the 2nd Amendment is not involved. If it were, we’d have the election cheating problem fixed already.
Yes and no. Without disputing any part of your analysis as to the 2nd, the issue of saying no has not been properly tested. Neil deals this week directly with the kungflu tyranny. THAT was when NO should have been heard around the world.
Instead millions begged for face diapers and the rest of the cult idiocy. Many many millions more went along with it rather than say no.
The same people who would defend to the death their right to smoke anywhere and everywhere were immediately donning face diapers because “if it makes other people feel safe then I don’t mind”.
So yes and no. The 2nd isn’t the only solution, however, it may be the only solution remaining because the time to say NO may have passed.
“So yes and no. The 2nd isn’t the only solution, however, it may be the only solution remaining because the time to say NO may have passed.”
Agreed. However, I’ll add that past successful efforts saying “no” may only have worked because of who they were saying no to … because those recipients were moral and law-abiding. Ultimately decent people. The people on the other side of this are none of the above. They are scoundrels of the first order, which they’ve proven a thousands ways already. That being the case, “no”might not work, even if there were time.
Neil is no doubt right. Which is why I am happy to see PDJT go full throttle on taking out the deep state. The idea that things can go ahead with a tweak here or there and in a spirit of bipartisanship blah blah is not an acceptable answer to the mess we have. The federal government is corrupt and rotten to its core and is failing as a result. It is also exporting its poison to accommodating States.
The people are so damn gun-shy of being arrested, jailed, falsely convicted, or shot, that nothing is happening to change the guards.
We’ve seen grassroots leaders have their bank accounts frozen, placed on no-fly lists, etc, as soon as their leadership & movement starts to show signs of growth.
We’ve seen people lose their jobs for the most incidental reasons, and we’ve seen people who live from paycheck to paycheck lose their paycheck. A strike would be wonderful, but the elite will just ride it out whilst the people suffer.
Same with government closures. The people suffer, the elite still go about their business.
We see France have an uprising that does nothing other than burn a government building or have bonfires in the middle of a street.
NONE of this affects the politicians, their appointees, their just-as-evil spouses, their handlers, and their ‘law’ enforcement. They just hunker down at their cocktail parties and laugh at the masses burning pallets in the streets….or are the masses being led by Ray Epps types who give the appearance of ‘doing something’ to keep the people busy, when we know that once the flames die down, nothing will change…other than more security laws be introduced.
The elite push and push because they can. The ONLY language the elite understand is when their money is taken, their houses are burned or they (and their families) lose their power, totally.
The France, Sri Lankan or Netherlands protests will only be successful when the elite are removed, have their houses burned AND lose power. Either arrested and jailed by the people, or treated as Gaddafi was. Either a mass deluge of people, or a covert cell will suffice.
But without the absolute removal of the elite, they simply hunker down and wait it out… to do it all again.
Make sure you use local records to determine the addresses of those names in your local area who are deserving of a visit, because somebody, someday soon, may need that list.
Please take a moment to read the Guidelines for comments, Rocket.
Amongst other things, it directs that, especially for long posts, you use spacing like this.
For those reading on I phones, such a long posts without breaks is too difficult to read.
Take what the elite have and they ride out nothing, they are finished.
These days I feel like Rorschach in ‘Watchmen’…
Amen
The corrupt gov’ts and MS media in the West obviously try to stifle free speech and any information that criticizes the official corrupt narratives. Former GB News’ censored host Steyn recently said that Neil Oliver’s on air time has been cut in half by GB News. Not certain if this is accurate, but he’s usually correct and there is little doubt that Neil is ruffling elite feathers and being attacked by the usual corrupt methods.
For example, using official so-called “elite groups” and corrupt politicians to defame him with lies as the quotes from this Guardian article indicate:
“Jewish group and MPs urge GB News to stop indulging conspiracy theories.”
“Fears antisemitic tropes are being spread after host Neil Oliver discusses plan to impose ‘one-world government. The criticism comes as the channel faces increasing scrutiny over its mix of serious news with programmes that delve heavily into conspiracies about areas including Covid vaccines and a plot to create a world government.”
The best Conservative pundits or commentators like Neil are under constant and serious attack from the left and the powers they usually control while the effective lefty hosts that spew constant venom and dupe their viewers with lies that encourage violence usually only provide a video clip to laugh at by Fox viewers et al.
“… the 20th anniversary of his unlawful war in Iraq last week – that unlawful war that led to over a million deaths, that destabilized the entire region to this day and gave birth to Isis.”
The drums are again beating to the same rhythm. “Axis of evil” is again appearing 20 years later in media stories about Russia, China, and Iran. “The China/Russia Axis”. Etc. See article today on Moon of Alabama.
And the very day after we hear stories of a coming rapprochement between Syria and Saudi Arabia, suddenly there are missiles and drones flying between Syrian “terrorists” supposedly “backed by Iran” and US troops and contractors in Syria. It makes me highly suspicious about what is going on. Is the US funding those terrorists/rebels/armed forces to create some incident that will allow us to carpet bomb Syria and kill/overthrow al-Assad as Hillary Clinton had the intention of doing?
Our State Department and CIA and 4th branch are completely out of control. They think too few are watching or understand what is really going on.
Oh, and by the way, our military directed by the neocon elites have started dozens of reconnaissance and surveillance flights over Finland spying on Russia the day after it became clear that Finland would be accepted into NATO.
We need a change of the guard and a thorough change in all the institutions of the guard. US hegemony has become an evil force in the world and it is back-firing on us all.
The Fourth Branch of the Derp State is utterly rabid.
It is difficult to conclude they seek anything other than a full on global war.
Congressman Sam Albert: [on TV] We knew that we had to monitor our enemies. We’ve also come to realise that we need to monitor the people who are monitoring them…
Carla Dean: Well, who’s gonna monitor the monitors of the monitors?
And exactly who defines who are “our enemies”; does that include our own citisens, who challenge the official narrative?
“Who are our enemies?”
Good question but its answered here everyday and you attempted to define who earlier in this thread.
Domestic enemies:
Any person would be defined as any US citizen or any groups of US citizens inside or outside of government who do not follow the US Constitution.
Foreign enemies:
Any persons or groups of persons or nation states who attempt through direct or indirect action to bring down the nation defined in the U.S. Constitution.
So you either as a US citizen support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies foreign and domestic or you ARE a domestic enemy of the USA.
Our ideal is laid out in the Declaration of Independence, ( an acknowledgement of God’s ((the Creator)) natural law). Every person is endowed by their Creator with rights and the primary among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Any entity or person or persons whatsoever who hazard the life, the liberty or the ability to own property and independently support themselves of any U.S. citizen is NOT following the Constitution.
Your enemy is anyone who would reduce or restrict your constitutional rights and freedoms. i.e any attempt to subvert the second amendment, they are all your enemy. All those that forced the covid narrative are enemies, all of them. All those who are pushing the insanity of climate change, they are all your enemy, all of them. The list is long and requires thought to grasp how big a problem the people of America are facing.
BREAKING J6 NEWS:
Louisiana congressman Clay Higgins—a brave man who has been leading the charge to STOP J6 detainee torture, was just KICKED OUT of the DC GULAG for CARRYING A BIBLE.
The fox has been in the proverbial hen house for decades. We’ve been living in a managed decline for 110+ years by using fear backed up with extreme violence from WWI to WWIII or IV, pending on how you look at it.
Keep us in a constant state of chaos and keeping the sheeple screaming “mommy make it go away” and the very people who cause the chaos has the solution. Like Bill Gates and Microsoft creating viruses will selling the cure.
Time to change the guards or the fox in relation to the hen house.
In his presentation, this is a curious comment. I edited it for space, there are two sentences inbetween.
“Obviously, I couldn’t possibly say one way or the other. A recent report from Australia’s TGA – the Therapeutic Goods Administration – equivalent to our MHRA – a report made available only by a Freedom of Information Request – makes plain that in January 2021 it was known to anyone privy to Pfizer’s own data that the lipid nanoparticle was widely distributed all around the body.
If they were doing their jobs and reading reports like this, then Chris Whitty would have known, Patrick Vallance would have known, Antony Fauci would have known.”
Andy Fraudci did know, because in 2017 he said PDJT “would necessarily face a pandemic”, and somewhere between September and November of 2019 is when the first infected people started arriving here, by most reliable timeline accounts.
There will be more train derailments, food plant explosions, and a lot of other false flag occurences this year, anything to try and distract us from what is really occuring. Keeping the overall picture, the long view, is not always easy, but it is required for us that just want to be left alone and follow Life. G_D is in control, for those who Believe this as I do, which is not a slur for those who do not, just my view.
Never truer than today —- There is no one person on earth to save us, WE Are The Ones We Have Been Waiting For
Wow!
Another brilliant video from Neil Oliver.
I am very grateful Sundance for the work you do.
God bless you!
I felt this was more powerful than any of his others.
It was when he leaned forward, almost imperceptibly, that I understood how intensely he felt every word. He covered every base in 12 too short minutes.
Betsy, I agree!
They feeling I got at that moment gypsy was so visceral, I shocked myself.
The slogan “Build Back Better”, infantile and ubiquitous and meaning something else entirely from what we were meant to think it did, was used by all despots throughout the Western world at the same time.
When Biden’s handlers used it, I’d heard Johnson do the same; and for a brief moment thought it was Biden plagiarizing once more.
I wish it had been that.
Infinitely preferable than what I just as quickly understood as soon as Merkel, Macron, Ardern, et al, and finally and most telling the WEF spewed it all altogether. There are no coincidences.
What followed with the “safe and effective” bioweapon cemented for me the absolute conviction the world was dealing with psychopaths and eugenicists.
We know now. Those who will not admit it aren’t looking. But enough are, and what we see in France is a sign.
Their uprising is not about pensions so much as it is that their population have put two and two together, as in the Netherlands with their farmers.
No sane person wants to see their countries burn. But it seems that “voting” has no power to do what Neil says we must do…replace those whose tyrannical hubris has destroyed the lives of people in the West, the last bastion of freedom and civilization as we once knew it. As it was meant to.
People speak of impending WWIII. I believe we are there…nothing impending about it. And it is existential.
The enemy? The Watchers.
Wars are horrible; but if this is how the world has to fight these monsters who are this close to subsuming us all with their evil, I see no other way. God forgive me.
Those who will not admit it aren’t looking.
I’m afraid it’s that most who won’t admit it are just plain liars.
There’s a part of me that thinks they know, but the acknowledgement is so horrific, many blank it out, Shadow. I have no way of knowing of course.
In the meantime, 3.5 million are in the streets of cities all over France. Paris, Lyon, Marseilles and elsewhere. Not reported anywhere here. Only through tweets. There are injured and dead police.
How long before Watchers in other European countries understand?
This administration is trying to watching the watchers and who guards the guards with a disinformation czar.
They have been slowed down but not given up.
Same with climate change.
Seems like it is going strong with the support of the weather channel that is another 24/7 news channel.
Absolutely right on.
Neil puts into context what Trump meant with “potential death and destruction.” At what point do we stop accepting and complying with their lies?
…..anything Neil Oliver puts out, I want to see it. Neil is an absolute tonic.
Neil Oliver once again speaking truth!