Michael Flynn Hearing Today 11:00am – Open Discussion Thread

The DOJ, Sidney Powell and the Sullivan appointed amicus John Gleeson will hold a hearing today in the courtroom of Judge Emmet Sullivan to argue the unopposed motion to dismiss the case against Michael Flynn. The hearing begins at 11:00am ET and you can call-in to hear the audio of the live courtroom events.  (details below)

  • 877-336-1839  – (access code 5524636)
  • 888-363-4734 –  (access code 6114909)
  • 877-336-1839  – (access code 1429888)
  • 877-402-9753  – (access code 2090166)
  • 888-557-8511  – (access code 4140864)
  • 888-273-3658  – (access code 1773796)

UPDATE: If you cannot get through on any phone line use this periscope link HERE

UPDATE 2: Technical issues at the court.  Recess called until 12:35pm ET to work on issues. I’m Dropping another link (YouTube) below that was not compromised during the “technical issues”.

UPDATE 3:  Some more technical glitches and a 15 min bio break until 2:45pm ET

UPDATE 4: Hearing ended abruptly.

.

If the true administration of justice was to prevail in this case, the judge should simply accept the unopposed motion and this would be the end of the malicious prosecution.  However, this case has so many precedents anything is possible.

If you are listening-in to the hearing, feel free to drop your thoughts and opinions into the comment section to share.

This entry was posted in 4th Amendment, 6th Amendment, Activist Judges, AG Bill Barr, Big Government, Conspiracy ?, Deep State, Dept Of Justice, FBI, Live Streaming, media bias, propaganda, Spygate, Spying, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

1,675 Responses to Michael Flynn Hearing Today 11:00am – Open Discussion Thread

  1. jay says:

    This hearing scheduled to coincide with the debate…fuel for GET TRUMP.

    Liked by 4 people

  2. bullnuke says:

    Gleason is a Biden voter. Enough said.

    Like

  3. jx says:

    Earlier this year the president said (tweeted) “good luck” – what a travesty!

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Niagara Frontier says:

    Here comes a lengthy presentation impugning the character of the President. All of it goes uninterrupted by Sullivan, a courtesy he did not extend early to the defense table when he interrupted Powell at least 20 times in 5 minutes.

    Liked by 10 people

  5. Leaving says:

    And lawyers thought the trial in a Few Good Men was crazy.

    Liked by 2 people

  6. All Too Much says:

    Sullivan might be wondering now why he invited Gleeson to the party.

    Like

  7. deeperinfo says:

    Gleeson says President Trump tweeted “Good Luck” to Flynn just before Dec. 2017(18)hearing before Sullivan: since Sullivan did not sentence at that hearing, is that proof that Sullivan was conspiring with President Trump via tweets???

    Now says “dirty cops” is a false narrative!!!!

    Dude: Evidence!

    Liked by 3 people

  8. Henry says:

    Whatw crock? Attacking Trump!
    Sheer bullshit posturing.

    Liked by 3 people

  9. lolli says:

    DOJ independence?
    What a joke!
    This is the first time. President has NOT had an AG.
    Liars

    Liked by 1 person

  10. cboldt says:

    How are Gleeson’s remarks relevant to the issue? Sullivan cut off Sidney, you made you point, what’s your next point?
    All for the news programs.
    This is what Federal Court is. Have you heard a SINGLE judge criticize the way this case is proceeding? Me neither.

    Liked by 5 people

  11. Carly says:

    Sullivan said he didn’t read everything, but he did read Sidney’s letter. Some say this is unsettling because it shows bias. I think it also shows that he doesn’t think Flynn is guilty- why bother reading exculpatory evidence? Even Gleason is telling him no need for evidentiary hearing (of course, the dirt would be on full display). But if Gleason knows the truth, then he has one choice: to do the right thing. I think there is a low chance of that.

    Liked by 2 people

  12. Bryan Alexander says:

    Barr has created a huge hole that Sullivan and Gleason are driving through. Barr should have already censured and disciplined the Special Counsel Lawyers for violating Brady. The lack of definitive official actions by the DOJ against Team Mueller is harming Flynn now.

    That being said, Gleason arguing before the court is gross violation of the Flynn’s rights. The judge is allowing a partisan WITH NO STANDING to make arguments against defendant. Sullivan should be severely disciplined for allowing this.

    Liked by 12 people

  13. paulapatriot says:

    This is such bs! I can’t take much more of this Ahole

    Liked by 2 people

  14. DJ says:

    Gleason is just flat out lying and misrepresenting the law.

    Liked by 4 people

  15. bullnuke says:

    TDS on full display.

    Liked by 1 person

  16. gsonFIT says:

    If Gleeson is so bent out of shape about PDJT tweets that is because he thinks Sullivan isn’t strong enough to ignore the President’s tweets. This is NOT about President Donald Trump.

    Liked by 2 people

  17. Johnny Bravo says:

    Gleeson Is a 100% wan£3r.

    I wish Sidney could get 25% of the time Gleeson is being given, without interruption.

    Liked by 5 people

  18. MR52 says:

    Wow, is Gleason arguments have zero merit. Wow! How about all the Obama interference. Give me a break.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. lolli says:

    No, our President argues for truth and justice.

    Liked by 1 person

  20. magic8192 says:

    This people really really do hate Trump. I mean really. How long did they discuss Trump’s tweets?

    Liked by 2 people

  21. deeperinfo says:

    my feed just died…

    Liked by 1 person

  22. Flabbergasted says:

    Gleason is just bashing P. Trump’s tweets as if they are relevant to the actions of the FBI in framing Flynn or withholding Brady information from him. He is being allowed to say the tweets, etc. are all lies without challenge. I’m sure his “testimony” will be repeated in 3 second sound bites on the news tonight. . . oops, the hearing just crashed again.

    Liked by 3 people

  23. booger71 says:

    Sound off again….what a crock

    Liked by 1 person

  24. bullnuke says:

    Anyone else lose the audio?

    Liked by 3 people

  25. TwoLaine says:

    Does Gleason have security clearances that Sidney does not?

    Liked by 3 people

  26. QCM says:

    And that’s it?

    Phones cut off!?!

    Liked by 1 person

  27. puca58 says:

    Sullivan is going to need to book a full 60min at Hand & Stone to relieve all the twists & turns he’s putting himself through to deny the motion to dismiss.

    Like

  28. bullnuke says:

    Of course it goes dead after Sullivan’s butt boy finishes his TDS remarks.

    Liked by 4 people

  29. TwoLaine says:

    Am I getting a free class in Judgeship 101?

    Like

  30. bekfl says:

    Lost the audio on you tube. Anyone still have a working link?

    Liked by 1 person

  31. wondering999 says:

    Was just informed that there are “387 participants on the call” including me
    I need to go to work but I want to be here and be witness to this.
    Somehow I think Flynn would stand up for me — I owe him this

    Liked by 2 people

  32. QCM says:

    IT guy 1: hey how long should we set thisnnidge Sullivan heading bridge up for?

    IT Guy 2: I don’t know, make it 3.5 hours, can’t imagine it going THAT long!

    Liked by 1 person

  33. cboldt says:

    Gleeson seems to be chaneling Biden.

    Liked by 1 person

  34. WhiteBoard says:

    Judge tripped the audio.

    Liked by 1 person

  35. TwoLaine says:

    People don’t get the solemnity of the federal court? Puh-lease! After the way this is going today?! After the way this court has treated General Flynn.

    Liked by 3 people

  36. rublenoone says:

    OMG getting tired of Gleason’s filibustering…”I embrace Fokker” /eyeroll

    Liked by 2 people

  37. gsonFIT says:

    When do you lawyers learn about evidence? Isn’t that first semester? Gleeson missed that class.

    Liked by 2 people

  38. Sassy says:

    Who is this Gleason guy, after all? His bias and snideness are obvious. He’s giving “evidence.” Is that his role (provided he even has a role here)? So his job is to tell the judge what to do? Is he a replacement for Mueller?

    Is Gleason under oath? Can Sydney or the government charge him with perjury if HE doesn’t tell the absolute truth? Can she even object? This seems outrageous, but then I’m no lawyer.

    What do the President’s tweets have to do with anything? It seems as if Gleason’s entire purpose is to provide the media with talking points.

    What also seems obvious is that they want to drag this out and either be able to charge Flynn again, later on, or force the President to pardon him and then go after the President for something like “abuse of power.”

    If Sullivan does dismiss WITHOUT prejudice, then they can come back after Flynn again, if I understand correctly.

    I can’t believe Gleason is smearing Barr, as if there aren’t rules of professional behavior.

    “They, they, they.” Talk about disrespect.

    Liked by 4 people

  39. Johnny Bravo says:

    And when the pendulum swings back, God willing, I will be allowed in this life, to watch them all go down!

    Liked by 2 people

  40. cboldt says:

    Gleeson refers to “my adversary.” So what is continuing here is an adversarial proceeding, with no parties except the court and the court’s lapdog, Gleeson.
    The majority of the DC Circuit knew and wanted this circus to go on.

    Liked by 1 person

  41. This screw up is unbelievable!!

    Liked by 2 people

  42. freepetta says:

    This hearing is so abhorrent it makes me sick!
    Gleason and Sullivan sound like 2 BFF!
    Absolutely sickening.
    Pointing to the President’s tweets is so low. PDJT is not an attorney, he’s just expressing his viewpoint as a member of the public.
    Gleason is a nutbag who should be disbarred!

    Liked by 2 people

    • Eric C. says:

      Notice how he answer the “there was a report we talked before your appointment as amicus” (paraphrase) from Sullivan. Gleason answers “this is the first time I’ve had the opportunity to address the Court” (paraphrase). How convenient, yes this is the first time he’s had the opportunity to address the Court – officially. He could’ve talked with Sullivan about the case outside of “the Court”, which neither of them will testify too.

      Very clever.

      Liked by 1 person

      • freepetta says:

        Completely false. So Sullivan and Gleason never spoke or was Gleason’s disgusting editorial in the WaPo enough?
        Is Gleason’s editorial relevant? Sure is!! He brought up PDJT’s tweets. Fair game!

        Like

  43. WhiteBoard says:

    Franklin Woody – STFU

    Like

  44. TwoLaine says:

    Consciousness of guilt. This is ridiculous.

    Liked by 3 people

  45. Screaming Eagle says:

    Now they are bitching about Trumps tweets ?? Is that where this ends up ?? Conjuring up Presidential obstruction again?? The gall of these bastards is unbelievable.
    Makes you wonder if Sullivan was coordinating with the Gimmydats to set the date of the arguments for September 29th. All the while, knowing that this was the date of the first debate. Fresh accusations for the azz-hulls on the reprobate / debate committee to exploit. Tonight will tell.

    Liked by 4 people

  46. MR52 says:

    Montana 1924 – give me a break. He is lost

    Liked by 1 person

  47. All Too Much says:

    Gleeson still yacking away, doing noting to help himself or Sullivan.

    Liked by 1 person

  48. mayflowerchild says:

    So did Sullivan throw Sidney off this call?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s