Joe Biden Picks Kamala Harris as Vice-President Candidate…

This is rather odd. Presidential candidate Joe Biden announces California Senator Kamala Harris as his VP candidate.  [Tweet Link]

As a candidate herself Senator Harris came across as a very unserious person.  However, she does represent the Obama-Jarrett wing of the party and was the favorite of the media when the primary contest was beginning.  This is the AME network.

James Clyburn selected Kamala Harris for Biden, and the pick is again more evidence of the need to reactivate the AME church network.

This entry was posted in Dem Hypocrisy, Election 2020, Joe Biden, Legislation, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1,052 Responses to Joe Biden Picks Kamala Harris as Vice-President Candidate…

  1. Patience says:

    Richard Goodstein (yeller, yacker of nonsense & whataboutisms, paid to be a laughing leftist jerk)
    has already begun the ‘v agina’ defense, and the you’re a racist/you miss-pronounced her name, and it doesn’t matter that she said she believed Joe’s accusers BECAUSE “what about Trump…?”

    The best IS yet to come

    Liked by 1 person

  2. TarsTarkas says:

    Some of my takeaways from the VP pick (I’m often wrong but am always willing to admit it):

    Even with the scale of voting fraud they are engineering the Democrats IMO are conceding the 2020 Presidential election. Pairing an old dodder with a synthetic black woman and yoking them to a Green Shining Path platform to attract the Mao wing ain’t gonna cut it. It would take an utter catastrophe or the Mother of all October Surprises to push those two over the top. the latter something that is unlikely considering all that has been thrown at the Lion these past four years.

    The Clinton machine is finished, and its used and worn components (Her Odiousness, Comey, Clapper, Brennan, Podesta) are available for disposal by the Justice System in an attempt to placate those demanding that someone wear orange jumpsuits. The FBI Spygate crew might also be sacrificed.

    The Obama machine crowd (Holder, Lynch, Jarrett, Rice etc.) will be allowed to skate, unless public pressure (due to Sundance, Judicial Watch, and others) forces them to sacrifice an underling.

    Andrew Cuomo is now the 2024 Democratic front-runner, since his mass slaughter of the old and sick will be so yesterday by then..Michelle Obama however will still be in the mix. Watch out for AOC, her loonyness will bring in the Woke.

    Kamala Harris is finished as a political force (by intention). She’ll be forever known as Calamity Harris, for her performance as a AG, a Presidential candidate, and as a VP candidate.

    The ascendancy of the Obama wing of the Democratic party will be short. The AOC/BLM/ANTIFA crew will primary the living s**t out of the machine politicians or intimidate them into subservience, and by 2024 may be in charge.

    Liked by 6 people

    • Debra says:

      I actually agree that the Dimms needed a throw-away candidate in the VP spot. I think she knows she is there because they are going to lose, so she can perpetuate her ‘angry black woman’ persona when they do lose. She does not know how to command a win — she has only gained office due to her, now loathed, antics . . .

      Liked by 2 people

    • Sugarhillhardrock says:

      I have to say you offered a really accurate and entertaining assesment of the leftie’s selling their demonstrably failed utopia, which is based on their intelectual elite’s misunderstanding motivations attractive to human satisfaction.

      Characterized well and humorously, Tars.

      Liked by 1 person

    • mike says:

      Just like Bill Clinton’s campaign was a throw away, except then he was a CCP rental and president for two terms….

      We cannot assume anything given the notorious dem ability to create votes and voters, as well count the in dark…


      • Ralph Kramden says:

        Mike, the only thing that doesn’t compute is (and, this is something I firmly believe) in 1992, America had what passed for journalists. The press was allowed to chose the winner back then, and they chose Clinton. Ah, for the bliss of the naive.

        Today, the press is seen as an enemy of the state, by far more than you think. That’s the reason it’s so strident in its opposition. They’ve squandered their power and want it back.


  3. Landslide says:


  4. spoogels says:

    What the media can and can’t say about Biden’s running mate

    A group called “We Have Her Back” has sent a remarkable memo to “News Division Heads, Editors in Chiefs, Bureau Chiefs, Political Directors, Editors, Producers, Reporters, and Anchors.” In the memo, the authors tell the media leaders how to cover the female whom Joe Biden will select as his running mate. They even graciously offer to provide the mainstream media with guidance as the campaign progresses. And they warn that they “will be watching you.”

    To:News Division Heads, Editors in Chiefs, Bureau Chiefs, Political Directors, Editors, Producers, Reporters, and Anchors

    From: Fatima Goss Graves(National Women’s Law Center),
    Ilyse Hogue(NARAL)
    Valerie Jarrett,
    Alexis McGill Johnsonand
    Melanie Newman(Planned Parenthood), Debra Ness(National Partnership for Women and Families),
    Cecile Richards(Supermajority),
    Jess Morales Rocketto,
    Hilary Rosen,
    Stephanie Shriock and
    Christina Reynolds (Emily’s List), Tina Tchen(TimesUp

    After the obligatory pablum about George Floyd and “inequality,” the authors provide a partial list of things they are forbidding:

    • Reporting on a woman’s ambition as though the very nature of seeking political office, or any higher job for that matter is not a mission of ambition
    • Relationships with partners, staff, colleagues and donors are characterized differently if the woman is not seen as subservient or supportive
    • Reporting on whether a woman is liked (a subjective metric at best) as though it is news when the “likeability” of men is never considered a legitimate news story.
    • Reporting, even as asides in a story, on a woman’s looks, weight, tone of voice, attractiveness and hair is sexist news coverage unless the same analysis is applied to every candidate
    • Reporting on questions of electability of women is, in itself, a perpetuation of a stereotype about the ability of women to lead
    • Reporting on doubts women may not be qualified leaders even when they have experience equal to or exceeding male leaders
    • Reporting on the heritage of Black women or women of color perpetuates a misunderstanding about who is legitimately American
    • Reporting on and using pictures of a woman’s, particularly black women, show of anger at injustice or any other kind of passion in communication perpetuates racist tropes that suggest unfairly that women are too emotional or irrational in their leadership or worse “hate America”

    Liked by 2 people

    • Big Jake says:

      We Have Her ON Her Back?

      Liked by 10 people

    • convert says:

      Of course, these same women were either completely ok or outright endorsed unbelievably sexist coverage and political campaigning against Palin.

      Liked by 4 people

    • MaineCoon says:

      “Reporting, even as asides in a story, on a woman’s looks, weight, tone of voice, attractiveness and hair is sexist news coverage unless the same analysis is applied to every candidate”

      Huh??? Hair? They used all this against PT!


      • Marc says:

        They used, and continue to use all those things against PDJT.
        Hair, weight, tone of voice, demeanor, likability, etc. have been fair game so the same goes for Kamala. When they try to Alinsky us, and shame us for going low and not meeting the values they ascribe to us, ignore them and don’t forget they don’t give a damn about you, your beliefs, or anything and anyone you love. Kamala is Heels Up and Biden is a doddering old lecher. Make it stick and keep up the ridicule because the Left can’t stand it.


  5. Troublemaker10 says:

    Liked by 4 people

  6. tozerbgood8315 says:

    Liked by 14 people

  7. Troublemaker10 says:

    Liked by 15 people

    • 4EDouglas says:

      Candace is a treasure and a pain in Kamala’s…..
      She won’t give up..

      Liked by 5 people

    • Sentient says:

      So Biden and Harris are too tough on crime? Not an effective argument. For every black man who chooses to stay home there’ll be ten white people in the Midwest who decide “well they can’t be that bad”.


      • Excuse me but the Midwest is not exactly the haven to liberal craziness that the coasts have been. There has been some looney lefty crazy spillover from the cities into some areas but for the most part, the Midwest is still center right. In my case, way right by today’s standards and likely center right 40-50 years ago. The spillover is primarily from the cities, particularly the university areas. We’re a help thy neighbor, love thy country and don’t tread on me sort of folk.

        Regarding “well, they ain’t that bad” that you indicate some whites may say, sorry but most I know are a content of their character sort of the crowd.

        Just sayin’.

        Liked by 3 people

        • Sentient says:

          Saying that Biden and Harris were too tough on criminals makes them more appealing to moderates. Or at least less unappealing to moderates.


        • Rick says:

          I think the point was not that the Midwest is liberal, but that most people there want anti-crime candidates. So if Biden / Kamala is seen as tough on crime by the left, it may hurt them in blue states (they will win anyway), but may help them get some Reagan Democrats in the Midwest. While I’ve heard leftists criticize Kamala for convicting black criminals, in this election she will certainly adopt a hardcore black lives matter, anti-police platform.


        • whoseyore says:

          Amen from another Hoosier!


    • Marc says:

      Indian when she wants to be, Black when she needs to be. But always oppressed, of course.


  8. spoogels says:

    Goodman: Hunter Biden’s Mysterious Source of Income Creates Problems for Biden Campaign

    After Hunter Biden abruptly resolved a $453,890 tax lien, Joe Biden’s campaign needs to explain the younger Biden’s source of income, Washington Free Beacon investigative reporter Alana Goodman told Fox Business on Tuesday.

    “How did he manage to pay off this $450,000 tax lien in six days? You know, most people just don’t have a half a million dollars lying around,” Goodman said.

    Goodman questioned Hunter Biden’s ability to resolve the lien after he told an Arkansas judge in his paternity case last November that he was unemployed, in debt, and lacked income.

    Hunter Biden LIED to the Arkansas judge

    Liked by 5 people

    • Justin Green says:

      There’s no telling what a crackhead will say.


    • Fools Gold says:

      He didn’t lie. He bought $3m in cocaine from burisma money and blew it all up his and his friends noses in Joe’s basement while secret service protected the property. Talking about a secure location and the reason why Joe can’t remember where he’s at and continues to stay there day and night and tweet his nominee…


  9. tozerbgood8315 says:


  10. daisythewonderdog says:

    Vote Joe and the ‘Ho

    At least their slogan is catchy.


  11. ziegler von strahn says:

    up util yesterday… Kamala the Ugandan giant was going to vote for Trump. He died, he’ll be changing his vote to Kamala, the jamaican slaver.


  12. Beaujackjangles says:

    Fix yo self girl. You got a Kamalatoe.


  13. Brant says:

    You pick a person from a state you need to win not a state you are guaranteed to win. Abrams from georgia for example. Does this mean california is in play? If so, Trump gets a near 400 vote win.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Marc says:

      Biden was from Delaware, Paul Ryan from Wisconsin, Sarah Palin from Alaska, and Mike Pence from Indiana. None of these VP picks came from battleground states in the year they ran.


  14. eric says:

    it will not be enough.
    President Trump is going to win.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. Justin Green says:

    At least underagedl children only have to worry about half the Democrat ticket this time.

    Liked by 3 people

  16. 4EDouglas says:

    Kamala reminds me of a Raymond Chandler Quote:”She was exclusive as a Mailbox.”
    At least they can’t challenge Trump on behavior now… Oh wait, they are Dems..

    Liked by 2 people

    • rcogburn says:

      Nobody said it like Chandler. This one too:

      “From 30 feet away she looked like a lot of class. From 10 feet away she looked like something made up to be seen from 30 feet away.”

      Liked by 3 people

  17. Sentient says:

    I’m sure there are strong arguments against Harris, but these ones:
    She’s a slut.
    She’s not really black.
    She was too tough on criminals

    are worthless.


    • Jason Ross says:

      ‘Tough on criminals’ is exactly the kind of strong message that demoralizes the Bernie and BLM crowd … taking their votes off the board.

      POTUS has dabbled in justice reform, if he makes a decent play here he could flip the script from the DEMs.


    • rcogburn says:

      Yet all three helped torpedo her candidacy in the primaries. I don’t think they’ll be any less effective in the general.


    • Marc says:

      1 is pointless but good for humorous memes. 2 and 3 matter with independents and left leaning moderates. Trust me, when I say it’s a big deal that Kamala plays up her Blackness and ignores her Indian heritage. She has a credibility and authenticity problem and minorities see it.

      Tough on crime to conservatives sounds amazing but to many Black and Brown people it sounds like an authoritarian, racist position(I don’t agree btw). Candance Owens pushes this angle because she knows it makes Black folks listen. It’s not a message for the Trump base. Not everything will be pure conservatismTM. Just look at the President.


    • yucki says:

      Strong and fair arguments are so…..
      Out-Alinsky the Alinskys. For example:
      • • Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon~
      • • A good tactic is one your people enjoy~
      • • Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it~


  18. Bugs says:

    I’m actually quite surprised by some of the comments here. Have we learned nothing over these last few years? I can’t believe some are actually thinking the Dems are somehow giving up on this election. Are you serious? If there’s something we’ve all learned it should be that the Dems scrap for everything. Absolutely everything. Without regard for laws, conventions, or plain common decency. Are we talking about the same Dems who’ve made Trump have to crawl over broken glass for every gain? Forget about every inch, they don’t give you a millimetre much less a centimetre without a battle. This lot is willing to go to Court to prevent Americans getting Chinavirus aid. So they damn well ain’t letting a Presidential election slip.

    I agree Biden\Harris is a weak ticket. But we’re naive to think the Dems haven’t gamed out their best path forward of those available. The Dems strategise everything to finite detail, over and over again. So this ticket is it. And judging by some comments here, I think their strategy is working in a way. Firstly, Biden and Harris have been selected BECAUSE of the dirt in their backgrounds. This way they can be completely controlled. We know they are puppets. More importantly, the Dems are also hoping this factor will allow them to shape the campaign. They want Trump and his supporters to get in the gutter, because that’s where the Dems reside. And these two candidates provide plenty of gutter material. Every minute we spend talking about Kamala and Willie etc, is less focus on the ISSUES. It’s the ISSUES Dems want to keep hidden because everything they stand for is toxic. Trump owns all the good Political Real Estate. That needs to be our focus. If we get in the gutter, Dems win.

    Liked by 10 people

    • Bigbadmike says:

      Thank you David Axelrod.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Bugs says:

        I know it’s stating the obvious for some. Others I think aren’t fully getting it.

        The Dems know that in order to “win” the election, they need to keep the backlash against them soft. They can then find the “right“ amount of votes they need to win without having to push the envelope too hard.

        Kamala and Willie, Is Kamala really “black”, Smollett hoax, Hunter’s baby mommas, Hunter’s crack problem etc etc. Dems WANT us to go THERE. This is precisely the strategy they’ve gamed out. Even Biden’s dementia. Do we really think the Dems were somehow oblivious to his condition when they made him the chosen one? Of course not. They understand it provides a SHIELD for them from the ISSUES. Their MSM partners can provide them cover as they need it. But they WANT us to focus on Biden’s decline. And we’re doing it, we’re doing it for them. Do you seriously think the Dems have somehow mistakenly allowed us too see Biden’s “mishaps”. No Dem staffer happened to notice Biden was holding his phone upside down, obvious notes in front of him etc. This is all deliberately released for us to focus on. It’s not an accident.

        The Dems know the vast majority of their base don’t care who they put up, they just want Trump out. In terms of the swing voter, they’ve targeted the suburban moms who tilted the mid-terms their way in 2018. They know that together with their MSM allies they can present Biden as a benign “silly old Joe” if WE waste our time on everything other than the issues. The suburban moms need to understand that their suburban idyll is about to become a suburban nightmare, not that Biden can no longer ever pronounce “mental fitness”. It’s crazy that I’m even typing a message like this, but we’ve long passed crazytime. Don’t underestimate just how dumb and uninformed many Voters are. We’ve got a short time to inform enough of these people, that we can’t afford to fall for Dem trickery.

        Liked by 5 people

    • grainofsalt2 says:

      Sadly, I agree. Also the hysteria on the feardemic that everyone should stay home so the Democrats can proceed with their universal mail-in fraud ballot voting and closure of polling precincts are on their cards. These are the things that we are up against. It is a big concern. What’s Plan B if these corrupt people closed the polling places due to “covid”? There are times when I just shake my head when reading from various messages on various sites how over confident some of the people on our side and not engage on more important issues that the American people are more interested to hear. The Democrats will do anything and everything to cheat and get the power back. There’s no time to be complacent and think that we got this in the bag.

      Liked by 3 people

  19. Justin Green says:

    CNN: Hey Joe, congrats on your VP pick.
    Joe: Huh? I haven’t picked a VP candidate yet! I haven’t even decided whether I’m debating Reagan or not yet.
    CNN: Joe, you announced the pick yesterday. Kamala Harris.
    Joe: Are you a junkie?
    CNN: It’s right here on your website.
    Joe: You’re a lying dog faced pony soldier.
    CNN: Moving on. IF you were to pick Kamala, what do you think she brings to the table?
    Joe: Bah, all blacks think the same. Nothing special I expect.
    CNN: You realize that’s racist, right?
    Joe: I used to have little black kids feel my hairy legs. Felt nice.
    CNN: Cut to commercial…

    Liked by 4 people

  20. Don McAro says:

    Hire Tulsi Gabbard to destroy Harris…
    She the only one that can do it effectively
    She is going to have lots of time on her hand to do it

    Liked by 3 people

  21. thinkwell says:

    Harris is clearly ineligible for the presidency (or to be VP). She is essentially an anchor baby born to two temporary resident aliens and was raised during most formative years in a foreign land. She was born with multiple citizenships and allegiances. The Constitution demands that only 100 percent USA citizens through-and-through ever become Commander-in-Chief (this is a presidential job requirement crafted to protect the Republic from foreign influence and intrigue).

    Here are two unassailable points of logic that loony leftist losers, the deep state and New World Order types always run from:

    Point 1. The adjective “natural” in the phrase “natural born Citizen” must not be superfluous and without contributing further significant restrictive meaning to the phrase it modifies, therefore a natural born Citizen must be a significantly restricted subset of born citizen (citizen at birth). Clearly the two phrases (citizen at birth and natural born Citizen) must mean significantly different things with the latter being a restrictive subset of the former. To suggest otherwise is insulting to the deliberate, articulate elegance of the Founders who meticulously crafted the Constitution over weeks and months.

    Point 2. Three inherent characteristics at birth are generally considered to contribute to citizenship and to one’s natural allegiances, these being: the citizenship of one’s father, the citizenship of one’s mother and the land of one’s birth (normally where one is raised). The Founders’ explicit stated purpose of restricting the presidency to only natural born Citizens was to provide a strong check to prevent the republic from falling prey to a presidency (and military) subverted by foreign influence and intrigue. It strains all logic and common sense to beyond credulity to suggest that the Founders would believe that a strong check would be provided by requiring just one of these characteristics (the least restrictive combination) rather than all three (the most restrictive combination).

    Liked by 5 people

    • ziegler von strahn says:

      Look up Jus Soli and Jus Sanguinis

      Look it up on a world map of who allows it. Any politician with enough cajones to say we should have jus sanguinis has my vote.

      The same as I always ask judges one question. Do you support Jury Nullification. (here’s a small hint, if you ever want to be dismissed from a jury, openly admit you believe in jury nullification. The Judge, and BOTH lawyers will ask you to leave)


    • wpsahm says:

      She was born in Oakland. California. I know that California SEEMS like a foreign country, but it’s not. She’s a natural born citizen.


      • Alligtor Gar says:

        So, by your logic, a Guatemalan anchor-baby spewed out in El Paso is electable as ‘natural born’?

        Liked by 1 person

        • wpsahm says:

          Look does the U.S. normally allow ineligible people to run for President? Either she is or she isn’t eligible to be POTUS. Are you telling me that the system allowed in a candidate that is Constitutionally ineligible to run for that office?


          • Alligator Gar says:

            Yes. Kamala is an anchor baby raised in Canada. No different from a Guatemalan anchor baby spewed in El Paso. No different from a Chinese birth-tourism baby spewed in L.A.

            An anchor baby is an anchor baby.


      • Kroesus says:

        Born in the country is one of the THREE legs needed as stated. The concept of NATURAL born citizen REQUIRES citizen parents at birth. That was the real issue with Ozero as well. We could have ignored his place of birth (unproven) and instead looked at daddy who was never a US citizen and certainly not at the time of his birth. Btw being born on US soil is a native-born citizen and does not qualify for the highest natural-born label.

        Liked by 1 person

        • wpsahm says:

          So the Federal Election Commission, and the election offices in every state and territory allowed an ineligible person to be put on the ballot, not once but twice?


          • thinkwell says:

            Yes. Reverse racism made them very afraid. The cowards couldn’t care less about the Constitution. In the past they have removed ineligible candidates for being too young and/or for being just a naturalized citizen, but many have skated through even these filters. It is up to masses of citizens to make life very difficult politically for these cowards to force them to follow the Constitution.


      • hocuspocus13 says:

        a Natural Born Citizen in the USA
        Has to do with more than just the soil your born on


    • Gary Wilmott says:

      Also Harris is a citizen of Jamaica per the Jamaica Constitution. Look it up for those who doubt. Chapter 2 Section 3Cb.


  22. Todd says:

    Imagine all the fake ballots being printed now and sent to warehouses across the country . China will be working overtime.. they will cheat no doubt.

    Liked by 3 people

  23. Dazza says:

    What happens if Hidin’ Biden doesn’t make it to Election Day, does “spanky” go to the top of the ticket?


  24. ziegler von strahn says:

    I’m thinking we see something akin to this for 2020 electoral map


  25. Ferret2 says:

    The question if the day:

    When will Joe find out he chose Kamala Harris as his running mate and how long will he remember?

    Liked by 3 people

  26. thinkwell says:

    By rights Kamala Harris should not even be a citizen.

    The founders and even most politicians up through the first three fourths of the twentieth century would be aghast at the concept of anchor babies. Anchor babies are only improperly considered a citizen at birth because of the perversion of modern courts and politicians in treating the Constitution as a “living document” so that they can interpret it however they please. This anchor baby nonsense all started with Justice William J. Brennan’s footnote in Plyler v. Doe in 1982 and was pushed into high-gear USA-destruct-mode by the evil Ted Kennedy.

    Section 1 of the 14th Amendment states:

    Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. […]

    Consider the following two unassailable points.

    1) The text of Section 1 clearly states that it only applies to residents of a state. Illegal invaders or other temporary alien visitors and their spawn have no legal permanent residence in any state. They are trespassing aliens or are tourists, students, etc. whose legal permanent residence is in an alien land, not one of our states.

    2) The subject of Section 1 is citizenship, so when considering jurisdiction, only political jurisdiction is relevant. The political jurisdiction of alien invaders, tourists, alien students and other temporary alien visitors and any spawn they might happen to drop is their home country. That is where they vote, and where they are citizens. The fact that they are subject to local criminal jurisdiction is irrelevant to questions of citizenship.

    Liked by 1 person

  27. In order to appeal to disaffected black voters who might lean toward protest voting (Kanye) or not voting (2016), Democrats ingeniously picked the one black candidate whose parents are not from America, whose ancestors had slaves, and who spent her career locking up black men.— Robert Barnes (@Barnes_Law) August 11, 2020

    Liked by 4 people

  28. fred5678 says:

    The Donald is having fun highlighting the YUGE disappointment over at Reddit.

    Reddit comments are calling her the worst possible choice because in this day of BLM, ACAB, and “defund the police”, she is a “dirty cop” and “dirty prosecutor”, having imprisoned minorities for MJ, while laughing about doing it herself.


    • Marc says:

      Exactly. The Conservative Right doesn’t comprehend the abject hatred the Left has for law enforcement and any legal authorities in general. The only thing worse for Harris is that she’s seen as fake by the very group Joe Biden needs her to corral him votes: Blacks.


  29. Skeeball says:

    The two most plausible reasons;

    1. They needed to sacrifice a black female with no political future past California, or

    2. Democrats are terrified over their internal polling for California.

    Pretty sure it’s 1, hopefully it’s 1&2.

    Liked by 1 person

    • ReglarMerican says:

      Another plausible reason – the demo-rat machine has their Fraud Machine fully ramped up in critical swing states that are ruled by ruthless crooked governors and Soros-owned Secretaries of State for election “certification”.
      For example, Gov. Wolfe in PA, Gov. Whitmer in MI, Cooper in NC., etc., and their crooked Secs of State.


  30. Justin Green says:

    It’s pretty damned sad when your genitalia and skin color matter more than your ideas.


    Liked by 2 people

  31. Biden & Harris = Sniffles & Slurpy


  32. keystonekon says:

    Kamala has more baggage than the underside of a passenger jet. This will be fun. They’ve already made a travesty of the campaign, our system of laws and now are stacking ballots to the ceiling, just in case the deplorable and silent majority turn out in record numbers.

    Me? Voting early, in person, with my photo ID, then going to my local precinct on Election Day to make sure it’s showS I’ve already voted.

    Liked by 2 people

  33. Justin Green says:

    CNN: Congrats on your VP pick, Joe.
    Joe: I haven’t made a VP pick yet.
    CNN: Yes, Kamala Harris. You announced it today.
    Joe: Are you a junkie?
    CNN: No, it’s on your website right now.
    Joe: You lying dog-faced pony soldier.
    CNN: So what do you think of Kamala Harris?
    Joe: They told me to pick a black girl – they all think the same way.
    CNN: You realize that’s racist?
    Joe: Look, let’s do some pushups. I had black kids climbing in my lap feeling my hairy legs and I LIKED IT. So get out of here and eat fish for breakfast on Tuesdays. Because I didn’t ride in here on a bed of lettuce.

    Liked by 1 person

  34. lcsteel says:

    In my opinion the biggest reason she was chosen is she is corrupt to the core and the globalist now own and control her.


  35. Troublemaker10 says:


    Liked by 2 people

  36. Cowboy79 says:

    Tulsi Gabbard on Kamala Harris


  37. MaineCoon says:

    Kamela is one mean b*tch which will set the tone for this race. It will actually be a good sight to watch our President cut her off at the knees via twitter & possibly even in a debate. Joe will be benched. No way he can do a debate. Probably will come down with CV-19 right after a day at some pool.

    Liked by 2 people

  38. 123 456 says:

    Watch them switch places before the big day arrives.


  39. J Gottfred says:

    I met with CA-49’s republican candidate and she told me among other things that Kamela was one of the most smart evil persons she has ever encountered. I didn’t know anything about KH, but it has all turned out to be so true, so true. Pence better be on his best game for the VP debate.


  40. Kamala Harris can Not legally/Constitutionally be POTUS or Vice-POTUS. No wiggle room or gray area!

    Kamala Harris is a “citizen”, but NOT a “natural born citizen” of the United States. Her parents were Not citizens at the time of her birth.

    Kamala Harris was born October 20, 1964. Her mother, Shyamala Gopalan, emigrated from India in 1960. Her father, Donald Harris, arrived in the U.S. in 1961 from Jamaica.

    Neither parent was present in the U.S. as a legal resident for five years prior to the birth of Kamala Harris, a requirement before her parents can apply for naturalization making Kamela Harris a 14th Amendment Citizen.

    “No Person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;” — Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of Our Constitution of the United States

    “In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death or resignation, the Vice President shall become President.” — AMENDMENT XXV Section 1 of Our Constitution of the United States

    Liked by 1 person

    • “This issue is Not complicated at all and very easy to understand. “Our Framers understood the meaning of “natural born citizen” as clearly as we understand the meaning of pizza.”

      “The only definition of “natural born citizen” that matters is the one held by the Founding Fathers!” — Leo C. Donofrio

      Our Framers used the law of Nations in DEFINING “natural born citizen”.

      “Law of Nations, Book I, Ch. XIX, at §§ 212, is this:

      § 212: Natural-born citizens are those born in the country of parents who are citizens – it is necessary that they be born of a father who is a citizen. If a person is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”

      Liked by 1 person

  41. 123 456 says:

    Got it, something will happen to Biden and they will declare him unfit to run. Harris will take his place and she will appoint a new VP.


  42. JackB says:

    Liked by 1 person

  43. In the Land of Poz says:

    This is not the VP candidate of people with even a remote hope of winning. What could be the other purposes?

    1. Downballot contests, bring out black vote (AME as Sundance says).

    2. Consolidate Obama faction control over party during the 2-4 lean years after a Trump landslide.
    Regroup to form bulwark against nihilist AOC/Omar wing of the party before it’s too late. Make America safe for soft communism.

    Pray the vote fraud is not on the scale we expect, because if Pixie Stalin gets in VP, that’s just about the end of everything. Either blood in the streets or she runs the country into the ground for 3 years as Biden replacement plus 8 as IC police-state Commissar. Andrew McCabe’s president.

    Liked by 1 person

    • TwoLaine says:

      “This is not the VP candidate of people with even a remote hope of winning.”

      That’s why I said. Not a serious pick. Brings noting to an already lackluster ticket. B.O.R.I.N.G.


  44. Patriarch says:

    Going to the Wayback Machine:
    Everything you want to know about Kamala but we’re afraid to ask….

    She’s Obama’s girl, his moat and protector. She was named Co-Chairwoman of the Obama Campaign.
    According to them, the Constitution is irrelevant:
    To wit:
    * Both he & she are NOT NATURAL BORN AMERICANS , ERGO, ineligible TO BE VEEP OR POTUS . Both parents must be naturalized Americans (takes 5 years) at the time of the baby’s birth.

    Kamala Harris was born In 1964 to two foreign nationals, a Jamaican Citizen father and a Citizen of India mother. Her father emigrated from Jamaica to the USA in 1961. Her mother emigrated from India to the USA in 1960. She moved to Canada with Kamala when Kamala was about seven years old. It is possible that Kamala’s mother might have naturalized as a Canadian citizen. Kamala Harris’ mother is now deceased.

    * If Biden wasn’t demented & Aunt Ruthie’s days weren’t numbered, she was intended her SCOTUS replacement.

    * Kamala’s brother in law is attorney Tony West, whose law firm defended Barack Obama’s birth certificate, raised $65 Million for Barack Obama’s election. Obama appointed him Assistant Attorney General in the Civil Division reporting to Eric Holder.

    Obama was elected with illegal campaign donations (25% of what he raises) coming through a SINGLE California bank) much from Tony West. Rumors swirl of up to $300 Million in undeclared campaign contributions are not reported or those donors.

    * Kamala, as CA AG covered up Obama‘s Illegal campaign donations.
    * She misused her power to provide a dishonest title and summary to proposed pension-reform initiatives she opposes. She recognizes no rules of decency or fairness.

    * She refused to follow the law on failed mortgages, threatening the FDIC and creating a $25 Billion Mortgage settlement that:
    Gave 70% of the money to government programs
    Penalized stockholders, brokers who never admitted guilt in due process
    Allowed the REAL perpetrators of the mortgage crisis (both public and private) to skate without ANY prosecution.
    (Very good explanation here.)
    It also gave her a slush fund of over $1 Billion to preside over.

    Joe will be pushed out after the 1st 100 days. He will have a “slip & fall”, or maybe get the COVID.

    Kamala husband is a nice Jewish boy from Brooklyn …..

    Liked by 1 person

  45. rcogburn says:

    Hold your nose and take a casual ramble through the left wing propaganda outlets (CNN, MSNBC, Vox, Slate, Kos, the Bulwark). You will very quickly see there is NO enthusiasm for this woman. It’s as if the media cheerleaders all have their pom poms at half mast. Slate, after pretzeling itself to trumpet KH as the first Black woman and the first Asian woman (a twofer!!), can’t help itself from describing her record as “wishy washy.”

    Kamala is the Democrat’s version of Dan Quayle – a milque-toast Uniparty establishmentarian whom those in power believe can be sold as “the future of the party.”

    AOC and the Bernie squad do not like or trust her. And as they go, so goes the all important youth vote. As for votes, her home state, Cali goes to Biden anyway, so is irrelevant in the general. And Kamala will fetch few, if any, votes in the key swing states Biden needs to win. Might she “bring it” to Mike Pence in the VP debate? Does anyone in America, left or right, actually care about a Mike Pence debate?

    More than anything, VP Kamala is a signal to the Uniparty at large (including the Never Trumpers) that President Biden (and more importantly, President Harris) = business as usual.

    & that means Kamala choice is proof the DNC victory strategy is not about winning votes, it’s to steal the election by any means necessary.

    Liked by 2 people

  46. Arrest Soros says:

    Neither Biden nor Harris will be on the ticket. Harris is just a sacrificial lamb as is Biden.
    Convention heads will decide the ticket. Biden will give up his delegates and the Super delegates will deliver.
    Bank on it.


    • furtive says:

      Obama is king.
      he put Kamala in the spot to save his legacy & protect him from criminal exposure. Susan Rice was impossible.


  47. Troublemaker10 says:

    Liked by 4 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s