Lancet Retracts Medical Study Critical of Hydroxychloroquine – Study Results Were Designed for Political Purposes…

The medical journal Lancet has now fully retracted their prior claimed “scientific study” against the use of Hodroxychloroquine.  The Lancet study was quickly and purposefully used by all major media outlets to attack President Trump for his advocacy of the drug as an effective treatment for the COVID-19 virus.

It now appears the purpose of the fraudulent “scientific study”, conducted by a sketchy outfit called Surgisphere – who mysteriously appeared only after President Trump advocated for the treatment, was to weaponize medicine for political purposes.

After they were exposed for their role in pushing manipulated data, Lancet has now fully retracted their study in an attempt to retain credibility.

LANCET – Today, three of the authors of the paper, “Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis”, have retracted their study.

They were unable to complete an independent audit of the data underpinning their analysis. As a result, they have concluded that they “can no longer vouch for the veracity of the primary data sources.” (continue reading)

Don’t expect the media to announce the Lancet retraction, or apologize for their role in pushing the political narrative around it.   Journalism is dead as the entire profession has now been exposed as nothing more than narrative engineers.

The Wuhan Virus was exploited for maximum economic damage and political value by an international group of operatives who needed to stop the rise of economic nationalism.

There are trillions at stake, and the desperate need to retain control of global economics by a small group of institutional elites in the banking, trade and finance sector; led to the virus being exploited.  The resulting global crisis is based on their hoax.

This entry was posted in CDC, Conspiracy ?, Coronavirus, Decepticons, Dem Hypocrisy, Donald Trump, Economy, Election 2020, Fabian Socialists - Modern Progressives, Infectious Disease, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

319 Responses to Lancet Retracts Medical Study Critical of Hydroxychloroquine – Study Results Were Designed for Political Purposes…

  1. alliwantissomethruth says:

    Is anything a crime when it involves leftists? Is there ever any consequences for these kind of outrageous stunts?

    How many people died in order for the left to gain another attack on President Trump?

    How can a just society allow it’s medical community to outright lie and endanger peoples lives in order to score political points?

    Mind boggling

    Liked by 40 people

    • alliwantissomethruth:
      Word Press doesn’t want your powerful message to acquire a ton of ‘likes’ so I’ll just write it out.

      Liked by 17 people

    • jwoop66 says:

      Note that. They are willing to let people die to achieve their ends.

      Liked by 15 people

      • mike says:

        Not just “let die”, they actively poisoned a number of patients in the earlier Brazil study in the “high dose CQ”(!!) arm. I mean murdered in a something that could have no therapeutic intent.

        Liked by 8 people

    • theoldgoat says:

      The matter of how many people died because of the politics of “proving” President Trump wrong, when he found out about it’s use and said it could be effective, is just astounding.

      Frankly, I think any who did not have access to this treatment, or rather their families, should be able to sue this company for their lies. This was a purposeful political action. It cost people a chance for a treatment which might have helped.

      This isn’t just one-ups-manshiip, it is plain evil. It allowed people to suffer and get worse because at that time there was no real handle on alternative treatments that were working.

      Liked by 9 people

      • laurisand says:

        Isn’t that what caused Gretchen Whitmir to pull it from any doctors in her state? She outright said they could not write any prescriptions on it, if my memory is correct.

        Liked by 3 people

        • DanJ1 says:

          Henry Ford Hospital in Downtown Detroit, the epicenter of the virus in Michigan, was using Hydroxychloroquine on 3,000 patients and staff with amazing results. I’m still waiting for the Leftist media to report the stunning results confirming Trump’s use as a preventative solution as well as to effectively help certain classes of patient.
          I’ll be holding my breath. Tell me when they admit they were and are wrong.

          Liked by 1 person

      • drlou007 says:

        Don’t forget the many thousands in nursing homes who could have been cured by the HCQ regimen and were denied the treatment by the fascist Faucci.

        Liked by 3 people

    • Snellvillebob says:

      Just last week Hillary tried to convince a judge that she was too important to have to give a deposition to Judicial Watch on Benghazi. So was Hillary’s Lawyer.

      Liked by 7 people

    • Guessed says:

      This was not “the medical community” lying to score political points. It was four MDs of which one (S Desai, at Surgisphere) was responsible for collecting the data for the paper. Three of the authors (presumably not Desai) asked for retraction of the paper after concerns were raised; they may be innocent of intentionally misleading anyone. Regardless, one or three doctors do not characterize the medical community at large, any more than Waksman or Summerlin, or Darcy (all frauds) have in the past.


      • Sir Winston says:

        If these drugs have any value treating patients with Covid 19, the article published in Lancet may have deterred is use in, maybe, thousands of them. It could be qualified as mass murder

        Liked by 3 people

        • Rajabesar says:

          Certainly a civil tort. There are thousands of clinicians around the world reporting success with HCQs in the appropriate setting : ie to mitigate the viral replication phase.
          Many many expert witnesses will testify as to the effectiveness of HCQs in the early stages of the disease. They will also teach a jury of the desperate need for anecdotal clinician input in time of rapid escalation of a disease such as a viral pandemic. The evidence is now overwhelming and even the American Journal of Epidemiology has chimed in supporting early treatment.
          Those denied this life saving medicine who then went on to suffer worse symptoms or death will have a valid tort claim in a class action suit. There are thousands of victims created by this purely political attack on an excellent safe, cheap life saving medication.
          Remember, this will be civil. In front of a jury. Lots of evidence available to show life saving usefulness. Lots of ‘expert witnesses” The “other side” has no defense and will be at risk for exposure of political ideology driving the resistance . A good personal injury attorney should help set the record straight. We do actually need those guys and gals from time to time. ;0)

          Liked by 3 people

      • Pew-Anon says:

        What does characterize the medical community at large is the appalling lack of pushback against the idea that shutting down the global economy is somehow an acceptable response to a new upper respiratory virus of the same type that otherwise causes nothing worse than the common cold…with the exception of one or three doctors.

        Liked by 1 person

      • roccoboy1 says:

        Yes but it is the fact that the “well-respected” Lancet agreed to publish it and as such give it credence. Lancet and other so called respected scientific journals are totally politicized. I have seen on multiple subjects. It is a sad state of affairs.

        Liked by 4 people

      • TheLastDemocrat says:

        The study came out, said “jump,” and various parts of The Medical Community said “how high.”

        We all saw this.

        Liked by 3 people

    • ncedgar says:

      We’ll put Lindsey Graham on it. He will fight to expose corruption! s/off

      Liked by 4 people

    • TDS has Mutated into TDV… TDS was Wanting to See Trump FAIL; Because: “Orange Man Bad”… TDVirus is Wanting AMERICA To FAIL and Americans to DIE, just so Trump doesn’t get Re-Elected.!!!

      Liked by 3 people

    • Friskycat says:

      Such a sorry state our world is in! People have to stop voting for globalists! They had a good run and now it needs to end!

      Liked by 2 people

    • If you’ve recall the fable “The Frog and the Scorpion”, yeah, the Leftists are like that…

      Frog: “Why did you sting me? Now we both shall die!”
      Scorpion: “I sting because I’m a scorpion – that is what I do.”

      The Left are TOTALLY GIVEN OVER TO A REPROBATE MIND – they are no better than rabid dogs and even more dangerous!


  2. The American Patriot says:

    Once credibility damage is done, there is no way to retain it.

    Liked by 9 people

  3. Arrest Soros says:

    I spent 15 years studying the Global Warming Hoax (from about 2000)
    I can tell you that this type of fraud (that is what it is) was/is very common among climate papers.

    Whenever a decent sceptical paper would be published (usually in lesser known journals because the main ones refused to publish sceptical papers) it would be followed by a counter paper put together in short few weeks and usually co-authored by up to a dozen well known “climate scientists” like Michael Mann, Ben Santer etc (they reinforce how important their paper is by the numbers of scientists signing on to it as co-authors).

    Also, there would be a slew of papers published just a few months before the infamous Un IPCC Climate Assessment Reports are due to be released. ALL OF THEM alarmist about the climate.

    Peer Review is touted as the bees knees of scientific publishing, but in reality is nothing but “Pal Review”.
    Some studies have exposed this scam by showing that up to 80% of scientific papers published have serious deficiencies and faults with them despite peer review.

    Put simply, DO NOT BELIEVE ANY SCIENTIFIC CLAIM and you’ll be right 80% off the time.

    Liked by 18 people

    • Sonia says:

      More evidence today of suspect climate change agenda-driven bias in our academic institutions.

      A headline in the Daily Mail: “Mangrove trees won’t survive sea-level rise by 2050 unless greenhouse gas emissions are reduced” is based on a report published today in the respected Science Journal.

      The obvious question is how have the mangroves survived for 100 million years? The first mangrove fossils appear around the Tethys Sea from the Late Cretaceous period – 100 million years ago. Sea level changes were large (more than 25 meters) and rapid during this period. The answer: mangroves are adapted to inter-tidal zones.

      Liked by 8 people

      • TarsTarkas says:

        Ah, but THOSE mangroves were able to adapt to THOSE circumstances. Modern-day mangroves are ecological snowflakes.

        Liked by 3 people

      • john says:

        Stop! You MUST stop! The term MANgrove is a micro-aggression. You’re so insensitive and sexist! Please use the term Persongrove or perhaps alternate between mangrove and womangrove. It’s bad enough that we’ll all be under water by 2050 and our safe spaces will be flooded!!

        Liked by 1 person

      • tampafan says:

        Ironic that I am working this morning in waste deep water with a crew in my small beach backyard to trim back the mangroves that have grown thick and high on a once sandy shoreline. Legally, can only trim them to 6 feet. They are growing more aggressively than they have in the 18 years I have lived here. (sadly, the shorebirds no longer feed here….and few/none now nest here in the mangroves).

        Liked by 1 person

    • California Joe says:

      Climate change doesn’t seem to impact Bill Gates and Barack Obama. Gates purchased a beachfront home in San Diego a hundred yards from the ocean for $43 million. Obama purchased an oceanfront home on Martha’s Vineyard for $15 million without any worry because the ocean is only rising in Miami!

      Liked by 11 people

    • dd_sc says:

      ..because the main ones refused to publish sceptical papers..

      That was the media-ignored scandal of the East Anglia email leaks a few years back. All the focus was on the biased climate data and models; the media ignored the emails about getting sympathetic people as editors of publications to control the peer review process.

      Liked by 2 people

  4. clipe says:

    As noted previously by Leo Goldstein, there has been a coordinated attempt by institutional press and academia to discredit the use of Hydroxychloroquine


    Liked by 3 people

  5. Gabriel says:

    Tried to read up on Richard Horton who is editor-in-chief of “The Lancet”, but had to stop at the end of the first sentence of the Wiki page, “…a United Kingdom–based medical journal”.

    Tells me all I need to know right there, Christopher Steele and Robert Hannigan 2.0., it would be a waste of time to even post the link. It’s easy to find on Google.

    Easy for US Libs to take action off of completely fabricated information from the UK Libs because it’s almost impossible to hold them accountable, which in this case ‘could’ have saved many people a lot of pain and suffering and possibly even prevented a portion of the infected from even getting infected.

    Also, if I remember right, wasn’t it some UK-Lib-Climate-Change-freak that was responsible for the faulty forecasting model that caused almost the entire world to shut down their economies and lock down the population ?

    But given what we know about how the Left works, you have to assume that since Libs everywhere were screaming not to take it, you have to believe it was effective in some way.

    If taking hydroxychloroquine was truly dangerous for President Trump and raised his chances of having health issues as a result, they would have kept their mouths shut and just smiled because that’s the kind of sicko’s they are.

    Liked by 8 people

    • MitchRyderDetroitWheels says:

      If it comes from London then it had to meet the approval of the Rothschild’s thus you know it’s not good for us Small People. Did up all those bastards and then hang them along with the Rockefeller’s.


      • Sir Winston says:

        It was not a scientific paper, it was a medical dossier.
        Lancet is not a scientific publication, it is a medical tabloid.


  6. Outerlimitsfan says:

    The Guardian is far left wing news but I have to give them credit for actually investigating Surgisphere and reporting on the troubling aspects they were finding.

    Liked by 4 people

  7. Bill Henslee says:

    Meanwhile all sorts of pundits, reporters, polticians etc. have taken shots (pun intended) at the President for saying that the drug has been proven safe for years and might help. He was also accused with having some financial interest it in. Don’t expect them to print retractions or apologize

    Liked by 4 people

  8. James says:

    Fortunately, there is a natural, non-prescription alternative to Hydroxychloroquine.

    Liked by 3 people

    • sedge2z says:

      James, that is an interesting article by ‘Viorlife’. It mentions a specific zinc, and has many references, but at the bottom of the pages, it says:

      “The information on this site is not intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. All content, including text, graphics, images and information, contained on or available through this web site is for general information purposes only. This is NOT a treatment for COVID-19. VIOR makes no representation and assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of information contained on or available through this web site, and such information is subject to change without notice. You are encouraged to confirm any information obtained from or through this web site with other sources, and review all information regarding any medical condition or treatment with your physician. NEVER DISREGARD PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL ADVICE OR DELAY SEEKING MEDICAL TREATMENT BECAUSE OF SOMETHING YOU HAVE READ ON OR ACCESSED THROUGH THIS WEB SITE.”


      • citizen owner, U.S.A. says:

        Just a reminder, sedge2z…Any thing not approved by the FDA has to contain that warning or one similar…whether it is effective or snake oil…in order to be sold. Big Pharma paid tidy sums to make that happen.

        Liked by 2 people

        • TheLastDemocrat says:

          Yes: in order to be sold, without having to deal with the high expense and high technical demands of the trials necessary for FDA approval.

          Instead, many things can be sold as “supplements.” As such, to steer clear of trouble with federal govt, they cannot make a preventive or curative claim.

          So, it is all in the hands of us free people to decide what snake oil, zinc, essential oils, or CBD we want to take for whatever reason.

          I don’t see too much of a problem with this.

          Plus, it keeps Alex Jones going, FWIW.


      • Kaco says:

        I will add, I looked up Epigallocatechin 3-Gallate (EGCG) and it can be too hard on the liver. Saw an article where a guy had to have a liver transplant for taking too much “green tea” supplement.


  9. Ray says:

    It seems the covid virus has become woke.

    Liked by 4 people

  10. JG3 says:

    Seems to me, everyone that lost a life/loved one has a criminal case…and just maybe, every American citizen has a civil case…damages!

    Liked by 2 people

    • sedge2z says:

      indeed. ‘damages’ especially regarding the misuse of Respirators, but let’s not talk about this until we get them all sold/gone/converted to be THE CURE for the NEXT Epidemic.


  11. Terry says:

    Major looting in Boston, 15 miles away all is quite in Cambridge. Just checked the local papers. So why was Boston targeted and not Cambridge/Harvard.

    Think real hard about this…

    Liked by 2 people

    • LIG says:

      Looting and robbery all over outskirts of downtown Louisville. Neighborhoods. not downtown. Jewelry, gun stores, Malls , banks. Curfew lifted except one area of virtue signalers finding themselves as targets. [ like they would care how you voted ).


    • mike says:

      Because the antifa said “we’ll take of them”, and went back to their dorm….


  12. omyword says:

    Meanwhile in the Philippines while following the corrupt china puppet thuggish WHO protocols, few get well, so….president DU30 asks for the “American” cure, HCQ.

    ‘Magine that

    Liked by 6 people

  13. Mortimer says:

    People have died because of the frauds on the Left denying them the medication that would likely save them.

    That is MURDER.

    Liked by 10 people

  14. islandpalmtrees says:

    Dr. Fauci, Soros and Obama helped to fund the Wuhan, China lab. The same lab that COVID-19 was released from, to infect the US, at great cost. One in which China, as you can see from below was ready to “Mass Produce a Drug” to treat it with.

    Later we learned that two research sciences say this COVID-19 virus was produced in a lab. A lab focused on expanding the functionality of the virus. A weapon!

    A weapon to be used on who?

    “The First Case of COVID-19 in the US Treated with Remdesivir Was in late January – Two Weeks Later China Was Mass Producing the Drug – The Firm Gilead Sciences and Dr. Fauci Are In the Middle

    Sundance writes
    “The Wuhan Virus was exploited for maximum economic damage and political value by an international group of operatives who needed to stop the rise of economic nationalism.”

    Liked by 5 people

    • Judith says:

      In other words, how dare we ignore their New/One World Order? You know, that Kumbaya utopia that John Lennon and others “imagine?”

      Nations are no longer allowed! No borders! No patriotism! No cultural identity! No personal freedoms! Who the hell do we Deplorables think we are anyway? // s

      Liked by 4 people

    • Tornarosa says:

      Whether released by accident or purposefully, the CCP acted in such a way as to kill as many Americans as they possibly could. Recenlty, Bat Lady Shi Zheng-LI has said basically, you ain’t seen nuthin’ yet. Literally ” This is just the tip of the iceberg.” Wondering what she did with the other 1500 bat viruses she kept in her refrigerator at the Lab. I don’t think PDJT will take kindly to another attack. Just sayin’

      Liked by 3 people

  15. jay says:

    When this information hits the Nursing home community, Trumps numbers will go up. All those sons and daughters that lost love ones will be furious! Tucker and Hannity will report with glee. Others will eat the report before reading it on camera to avoid embarrassing themselves.

    Liked by 2 people

    • MitchRyderDetroitWheels says:

      Not in New York….The Governor only killed 20K and nobody has called his hand. I will assume all the children of those that died were liberals as well. If so then I guess it was OK with them then it sure as hell is OK with me. The less liberals the better.

      Sgt Barnes…Doc, tag him and bag him

      Liked by 1 person

    • JoeJoe says:

      The “news” isn’t covering it. We’ll have to get it out ourselves.


  16. Beau Geste says:

    As noted by Bird Watcher, above,
    The so-called “Peer Review” of these two, formerly-credible publications was corrupted.
    We need to know who “peer reviewed” this phony representation. How were they selected? What did they conclude about the data, statistics, information sourcing, study design, lack of zinc, late-stage use?
    The “peer review” process, and the “Peer Reviewers” need to be made public. Whoever “peer reviewed” these representations is just as culpable in any fraud, unnecessary death, intimidation and misinformation of physicians who rely on the ‘credibility” of the Lancet and New England journal for acurate and honest information and advice.

    A lawsuit for aiding and abetting death would permit disclosure of these ‘peer reviewers”, their comments, and how they were selected. A Senate ‘investigation with subpoenaes would ferret out these tricksters, and whoever may have put them up to their trickery. They need to be exposed.

    Write your senators, and other crooked congresscritters

    Liked by 5 people

    • Beau Geste says:

      “Peer Reviewers” represent that they are ‘expert’ and honest. When they are not, they need to be exposed as inexpert/incompetent and/or dishonest.
      The “peer-reviewed” publications represent credibility of their journal, editors, internal reviewers, and external “peer reviewers”, which should at least prevent easiliy-detectable fraud.
      Government investigations and lawsuits are in order.

      Liked by 2 people

    • I have read that Big Pharma gives from $1M-$5M, maybe more, for every member of Congress. I doubt that any investigation will do anything more than we are seeing right now with Lindsey’s FBI/CIA inquisition. Most of our elected representatives aren’t really working for us, or they probably wouldn’t have been elected to begin with. We see how many traitors are working against our President every day.


    • TheLastDemocrat says:

      When I peer review, it is nearly always pretty mundane.
      But I have come across some stuff that was just lousy, orvwrong, but I was pretty sure the editors would probably favor publishing.

      So, I have started my review saying “if the journal really wants to publish this, the editors will have to find another reviewer.” I then throw out my damning review. FWIW.

      And I have done my part.

      if I am not an editor, I have little control. If they want it published, they may ignore reviewers and get different ones.

      For this Lancet train-wreck, it hit the headlines, and I got it, knowing there would be funny business.

      The main thing I saw, which was damning knowing this limit could actually be addressed, was the problem of “Treatment by indication,” with weak ineffective effort to control for this.

      Seeing it published confirmed my view: if journal really likes it, they will ignore and replace a reviewer.


  17. Krashman Von Stinkputin says:

    All scientific journals have an Impact Factor
    Journals with higher impact factors are often deemed to be more important than those with lower ones due to the rigor of the review both data and peer prior to publication.
    For basic researchers, clinicians the journals with the highest IF are Nature, Science and Cell
    For medical, Lancet, JAMA, NEJM

    Lancet just took a big hit to make a political point.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Tornarosa says:

      Good point Krashman. I’ve never taken Lancet or JAMA as gospel, quality all over the place, you learn to take the good with the bad. But really disappointed with NEJM which I have always regarded as the Gold Standard for medical journals. I suspect the grand old men of medicine are being replaced by drones in a rush who click boxes on a laptop.

      BTW, I’m Shocked by how politically correct most journals and magazines have become. I used to enjoy Scientific American and Popular Science, but my BP won’t allow it now. Popular Mechanics on the other hand is on top of scientific breakthroughs, fun to read and conservative friendly.


      • Krashman Von Stinkputin says:

        The professor whose lab I workde in back when AIDS was the rage told me:

        The Science that gets FUNDED is
        The Science that gets DONE.

        As long as said it was related to man-made climate change…..
        I could put a turd in a cup and call it research and get funding


      • Beau Geste says:

        Scientific American went way downhill when the Germans bought it.
        IMHO, It should be called “German Antiamerican”


      • TheLastDemocrat says:

        JAMA took a big hit with the conflict-riddled Robinson paper a few years ago.

        As attempt to redeem, DeAngelis editor and others made major policy advances regarding reporting of “conflicts of interest.”
        After she threatened a couple researchers’ careers like a bully.

        Tons written about that kerfuffle. Google a few terms I have put here. Plus “Leo” “Lacasse.”

        In short:


  18. Maffet says:

    I’m a physician. Medicine was politicized a long time ago. Only 15% even belong to AMA. Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA all political rags . . .

    Liked by 10 people

    • Yy4u says:

      Read this to a retired surgeon husband who said, “I agree “.

      Liked by 3 people

    • sedge2z says:

      Do physicians rely on info from their pharm suppliers? I doubt they spend any free time reading med journals. This isn’t a snarky question. I respect physicians and wanted to be one when I grew up (like my dad)


      • Yy4u says:

        Hubby got most of new information attending high powered medical meetings in his subspecialty. Most of what was reported in meetings was or would be in journals. He likewise reported in meetings and published in journals, mostly clinical results in a busy surgical practice associated with a medical school and teaching hospital (trained residents and fellows).

        When I worked in research back in the Dark Ages, , my bosses requested reprints of articles from journals, but that was before stuff was available on line. I HATED writing for, filing and caraloging reprints! This was in an academic situation at a medical school. We did a lot of basic science research too. But it has been years so I don’t know how it is done today. I am appalled by Lancet but Trump Derangement Syndrome obviously affects journal editors too.

        I suppose some physicians get information from pharmacy suppliers; and/or medical device suppliers, i just don’t know any who would allow it to reflect on their practice or treatment of patients. But then I don’t know any docs publish in Lancet


    • evergreen says:

      Any organized outfit is susceptible to coercion rooted in politics. The left is activist. That means every aspect of their existence is designed to change, change, change. They will skip their entertainment and put themselves out just to cross the street to harass the object of their hatred. Normal people, on the other hand, don’t wish to disrupt their reasonable contentedness to mess with other people’s business. So, we live in a world now where every corner will be populated with busy-bodies, who affect every school, office, association,…and journal.

      They could be a 1/3rd minority, but they’re embedded everywhere. It’s like ink in water.


  19. islandpalmtrees says:

    Hydroxychloroquine cost a few pennies to produce and the Remdesivir and other big farmer drugs cost much, much more.

    Liked by 4 people

    • paper doll says:

      It’s just that simple.


    • Tornarosa says:

      I’ve heard $700 – $1000 for a treatment that isn’t nearly as effective as HCQ/Zinc, which might cure you or prevent you catching it, vs Remdesivir which may incrementally decrease the time you are shedding the virus. YMMV


  20. mike says:

    The antiviral properties of vitamin D and C have been subjected to this same medical BS process with literally hundreds of misrun and distorted reports on trials for decades. This time with WuFlu, a lot of (young) doctors died short on C and D. (and zinc and flavonoids) Oopsie.

    Only lately have the endrocrinologists revolted part ways, for more adequate vitamin D levels. ICU care has turned a little ways for a litlle IV vitamin C.

    For the real vitamin C stories, read about Dr Fred Klenner’s IV vitamin C work in Dr. Thomas Levy’s book, Curing the Incurable (mostly pathogens and toxics), and Robert F Cathcart’s bowel tolerance protocol for useful vitamin C dosing orally.

    Liked by 1 person

  21. ladyliberty11 says:

    Yes, how many people have died of Covid-19 because governors and government agencies banned the use of Hydroxychloroquine or severely limited its use in the treatment of Covid-19?

    And, how many have died because mayors and governors will not effectively utilize the National Guard or their police forces to protect their citizens and property?

    And, who delayed reopening their states for business on long-disproven or questionable data, but now let rioters, looters and anarchists run wild, destroying those very businesses just as they were preparing to reopen?

    All to defeat President Trump.

    We need to posit these three questions every time we interact with anyone – leftists, voters on the fence, uninformed and misinformed voters, politicians, the media, pollsters, people we come into contact with in everyday life, strangers – whatever gets the word out and makes people think.

    Amercans are angry and afraid; we need to point out to them who is really destroying this country.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Tornarosa says:

      Not a legal beagle here LL!!, but I think they are hiding behind the Declared Emergency gambit which they use as their Get Out of Jail card, like Adam Schiff abuses the immunity from prosecution when addressing Congress. Otherwise this whole thing screams negligent homicide so loud I have to wear earplugs


  22. islandpalmtrees says:

    COVID-19 affects the old most but why. Why lock down the country, for a virus found to be less infectious than the common flu. Why use a model to predict the behavior for this virus based on defective data. Why not allow the Hydroxychloroquine to be used a preventive.

    I know, it’s just a coincidence. Or, is it part of a plan?

    Liked by 1 person

  23. Spooky says:

    “a small group of institutional elites in the banking, trade and finance sector”
    Hmmm, I wonder what tribe is closely associated with those activities? Nothing to see here, move along now.


  24. The Akh says:

    I am absolutely beyond livid.

    This is criminal beyond comprehension.

    They will stop at nothing.

    I don’t like terms like “evil”, because it explains the inconceivable too easily. But I got nothing else at this point.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Outerlimitsfan says:

      Completely agree. How does a fraud company like Surgisphere become so influential in this first place? A science fiction author and adult model on their staff and really no scientific people. It’s crazy. 😂

      The amount of people this scam affected is disgusting. They desperately don’t want this cheap drug being a beneficial treatment. I doubt it’s a cure, but for many the drug can likely be helpful.


      • The Akh says:

        Go look at thier website. Its looks like something thrown up overnight. That’s the type of website that was common 15 years ago.

        The fact that it is a Chicago based company is the cherry on top of this **** cake!

        Liked by 1 person

        • fred5678 says:

          …and a ridiculous company name, to boot.

          Surgisphere — a birthday party company that uses helium to blow up balloons in your backyard???


          • Tornarosa says:

            Hmmm . Fred, I think you are on to something there. “Surgi-Sphere” suggests surgery on a sphere, or a globe. Here’s the famous Fabian Window in the George Bernard Shaw Library of the London School of Economics where Karl Marx used to write books about Kapital and stuff and stuff like that. Probably just a coincidence.


  25. Yy4u says:

    Anyone else thinking “Trump Boomerang”.

    Liked by 1 person

  26. John Drake says:

    It’s really not that complicated once one realises two things:
    1) The Hate Trump
    2) The Pharmaceutical Industry Lobby is a ‘YUGE’ part of the Donor Class

    …and many are controlled by the Chinese…


    Liked by 2 people

  27. cyberfoy says:

    Still waiting for Trump to break up the central banks, corporations and media companies responsible for this chaos. Go on the offensive already.


    • JoeJoe says:

      Trump is busy trying to prevent himself from being killed by the protesters. They mean to get to him by hook or by crook. DC’s “mayor” Muriel Bowwow has lifted the curfew tonight.


  28. Skippy says:

    Retraction—Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19:a multinational registry analysis
    We always aspire to perform our research in accordance with the highest ethical and professional guidelines. We can never forget the responsibility we have as researchers to scrupulously ensure that we rely on data sources that adhere to our high standards. Based on this development, we can no longer vouch for the veracity of the primary data sources. Due to this unfortunate development, the authors request that the paper be retracted.

    Click to access S0140673620313246.pdf

    Liked by 1 person

  29. fred5678 says:

    Lancet FAKE NEWS and all associated stories, promoted by FAKE MSM, is a MUCH BIGGER scandal than Russia/Russia, in my mind.

    Perhaps tens of thousands of lives were sacrificed on the anti-Trump altar of Liberal/Democrat/MSM hate, not to mention massive bankruptcies of businesses small and large — leading to more deaths by suicide.

    FOOKIN’ DNC/CNN/ABC/NBC/CBS presstitutes are soulless criminals. HANG ‘EM!!
    (after a thorough investigation and fair trial, not advocating violence, of course)

    Liked by 2 people

  30. Cathy M. says:

    Fairly long article but worth a read if you’re interested in the details.
    The 1st few paragraphs concerns doctors, etc. that are pro-chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine.

    The rest of the article concerns what sounds like a totally made up “study” that determinedchloroquine or hydroxychloroquine will kill you .

    “On May 28, 2020, dozens of eminent “clinicians, medical researchers, statisticians and ethicists from [universities and medical centers] across the world” addressed an open letter to the study’s authors and the editor of the Lancet in which they raised “both methodological and data integrity concerns.”

    ”The letter writers smell a rat.”

    “Surgisphere, whose employees appear to include a sci-fi writer and adult content model, provided database behind Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine hydroxychloroquine studies”

    This article is written in plain English;-)
    “(This morning, the number of employees on LinkedIn had dropped to three.)”

    Liked by 1 person

  31. sarsfield says:

    from the LAncet website:

    Our manifesto:
    Highest standards for medical science
    The Lancet sets extremely high standards. We select only the best research papers for their quality of work and the progression they bring.

    I looked quickly at their site – the original article still there – no retraction shown.

    Someone tell me I’m wrong please.

    Liked by 1 person

  32. Nrssie500 says:

    Surgisphere is a data collection organization that provides information about medical protocols and medication data to member hospitals.
    In their database for Hydroxy chloroquine, or chloroquine they explained that raw data was used in their report and that corrupted the overall result.
    Also, one Asian Hospital’s data was mixed into the Western Hospital database further corrupting the data.

    Liked by 2 people

  33. T2020 says:

    (I was just going to post that article. Lol.)

    Surprise!! Where’s the science, Nasty Smellosi??!! (Aka Skeletor)

    Liked by 3 people

  34. T2020 says:

    And NY just announced no new CCPV deaths.

    Liked by 2 people

  35. Bob Parker says:

    One f the most important things that we can do is to be current events junkies. By doing so, we try to stay on top of Covid-19 & most important, learning if there might be something else, even more potent than Covid-19!

    Dr Jerome Corsi Phd ( has an e-book out talking about Covid-20, how the Russians already have it ready for RELEASE (yes against us!) & 2 important takeaways:

    1. Covid-20 will take far less time to work/detroy a person’s body. And NO ONE is immune from it (Young, middle-age, elderly)

    2. HCQ used as a preventive already in one’s body offers the strong possibility that a person infected with Covid-20 can SURVIVE it.

    I have been gathering articles about HCQ & have already learned that:

    Since 2018, Russia has been producing AND stockpiling HCQ for its own population!
    Costa Rica actively utilizes HCQ in treating its citizens (successfully by the way) for Covid-19,

    A Yale epedimiologist is quoted as stating that “HCQ should be widely available & promoted IMMEDIATELY” (as a standard treatment!

    And, oh let us not forget how Little Turd Dr Fauci has been waging war against HCQ. And why not as the stories are already out there that Fauci has patents out there working with BIG PHARMA & looking for a BIG PAYDAY if 1 of his pharma companies comes up with a CURE from which tons of $$$ can be made!!! Any yeah, Birx & Redfield are up to their eyeballs in corrupt pharma connections too.

    Recall that the Little Turd has parading this now debunked study around as definitive proof positive that HCQ was a big -0- in Covid-19 treatment DESPITE all of the DOCTORS who enthusiastically reported in on the SUCCESS they were having with HCQ!!

    We are in the process of passing thru an enormously high hurdle that has shut our country down for the 1st time in its history. Do not think for 1 minute that Russia & China haven’t been avidly studying us & taking notes on how this crippled us.

    Is there something worse that is in waiting (e.g.for the riots to run their course thru this summer) for us? Methinks & I fear that the answer is yes. Please think about it, research it, & formulate your own conclusions so you can take corrective action.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Bromdale says:

      It took me a while to realise that this is about more than Covid-19. If the pessimists are right, and there are more dangerous man-made pathogens in preparation, then if these pathogens are further developments of Covd-19 it is highly likely that they can be resisted using HCQ, since vulnerability to the presence of zinc in cells appears to be e generic characteristic of this type of virus. It follows that there is a great deal still invested in keeping knowledge about HCQ, and supplies of the the drug itself, as far away from the general public as possible.

      Liked by 1 person

  36. Donna in Oregon says:

    The first part of this article is about COVID 19, my favorite part is:

    “The new Stanford University antibody study “data indicates a fatality rate of infection from the coronavirus of between 0.1 and 0.2 percent, a risk far lower than previous World Health Organization estimates, which were 20 to 30 times higher and motivated isolation policies.”

    The saddest part is the damage done to Americans that is not talked about enough:

    ……..former Stanford University’s M.D, Dr. Scott Atlas. “I think one thing that’s not somehow receiving attention is the CDC just came out with their fatality rates,” The Hoover Institution’s Dr. Atlas said to Fox News. “And lo and behold, they verify what people have been saying for over a month now, including my Stanford epidemiology colleagues and everyone else in the world who’s done this analysis — and that is that the infection fatality rate is less than one-tenth of the original estimate.”

    “The [broad shutdown/isolation] policy itself is killing people. I mean, I think everyone’s heard about 650,000 people on cancer, chemo, half of whom didn’t come in. Two thirds of cancer screenings didn’t come in. 40 percent of stroke patients urgently needing care didn’t come in,” Atlas said. “And now we have over half the people, children in the United States not getting vaccinations. This is really what [Fauci] said was irreparable harm.”

    “And I and my colleagues from other institutions have calculated the cost of the lockdown in terms of lives lost,” Atlas stated on 5.23.2020. “Every month is about equal to the entire cost of lives lost during the COVID infection itself. This is a tragic, misguided public policy to extend this lockdown, whether or not it was justifiable in the beginning.”

    The rest of this article is one of the best interviews with President Trump and Sharyl Attkisson

    Independent Journalist Sharyl Attkisson’s “Deep State” “Call it Treason” Interview, COVID19 & President Donald J. Trump

    Liked by 1 person

  37. Liberty Forge says:

    Now add the push for Contact Tracing:

    FTA: “Redfield said the CDC is looking to expand the contact tracing workforce by between 30,000 and 100,000 people. Experts have said hundreds of thousands of contact tracers will be needed nationwide to identify those who have been infected with the coronavirus and those with whom the infected person has come into contact.”

    A Contact Tracing “workforce” of up to 100,000 people is needed, according to the CDC.

    What is this — really?

    We have never “traced” anyone who had the flu.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Jason Ross says:

      What is happening to our nation?

      Liked by 1 person

    • Tornarosa says:

      Liberty, the way you present this make me worried even more. It is only the autocratic Dems pushing this. It sounds presentable to the public, but communists always use a gimic or loophole to infiltrate and ensconce themselves. In FDR days, communists infiltrated though one hiring agent in the Agriculture Department of all places, and from there farmed out to new assignments elsewhere, especially State. BTW, that’s why all the socialist programs are administered by the Ag Dept today.

      Liked by 1 person

  38. Bone Fish says:

    CCP bug cure …

    200mg, 3x daily for 10 days

    500mg, 1X daily for 5 days.

    Zinc Sulfate:
    220mg, 2x daily for 10 days

    Vitamin C:
    5,000mg, 2x daily for 10 days

    Liked by 1 person

  39. dufrst says:

    Irony of ironies would be if the protests cause a second way among all the protesters and there still remains no treatment for CV widely available. How many will be looking for HCQ for treatment? I have a feeling the media will begin to tout HCQ if the the infection rate is high enough among the blue state crowd. After all a sick base is not a voting one.

    Liked by 2 people

  40. Dan Dan says:

    ICYMI – FYI — Fake Study Exposed Part 15 — WHO admits it did not verify Fake Study despite its vast resources…

    “It is v difficult for us to check data quality of each published paper & we trust authors to adhere to basic stds.”

    Yet it had no problem using those vast resources condemning Hydroxychloroquine use worldwide…

    Liked by 1 person

  41. StuckInBlue says:

    1) We’re in the middle of a pandemic, with hundreds of thousands dead, millions sickened, and doctors around the world trying to figure out the best treatment protocols and the disease etiology, and to help as many people as possible.
    2) Two of the most “prestigious” medical journals (NEJM also retracted theirs) make the editorial decision to publish a “study” that purportedly shows that a particular drug combination is not effective.
    3) After a review by customers of those journals, it is discovered that the “study” is completely fraudulent, and should have been caught during peer review.
    4) Hundreds of ongoing trials using HCQ + zinc, or Ivermectin + zinc, or Quercetin + zinc, etc. are *cancelled* or interrupted because of (2), and now need to be restarted. In addition, it is unknown how many people died or became more seriously ill because of the decision to withdraw lifesaving medicine.
    I guarantee you, this is a BIG ******* DEAL.

    Liked by 2 people

  42. Retired IG says:

    Think I just lost a long post. Not sure. But I think the Lancet retraction is a VERY BIG DEAL. I used to subscribe to their monthly reports. Now I know where (mostly AP) articles about Covid always included a tagline about a “STUDY” that HCQ was ” deadly.” Stated as a FACT with no attribution.
    Finally, on Monday the WSJ shamed Lancet and rightly so. Bizarre how a “study” by Lancet dared to include a lecture to the President of the United States!?
    FAR MORE DEADLY than COVID, ANTIFA, RIOTS – you name it, is the DEADLY VIRUS of TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME that has INFECTED UNCOUNTABLE “humans” all around the world infected with TDS.
    I do not know if there is a CURE for TDS. But MUCH BLOOD and TREASURE has been spent to RID THE WORLD OF PRESIDENT TRUMP. This is the REAL VIRUS at the very heart of things methinks.
    I for one will never forget what Pres Trump has done to turn the world up side down and that so many are getting “twisted up in their underwear.” Almost feeling guilt watching it all unfold.
    For me, its almost Like a movie rated X. .
    ” “

    Liked by 2 people

    • WRB says:

      I can only assume that things were going well for some powerful group(s), and President Trump represents a huge setback for them.

      Who are these enemies? It is amazing we have no clear idea. Yes, we can name people, groups, ideologies, and countries, but there is active coordination, money and aggressive action taken. Who is running this? And how do “we” defeat them?

      Liked by 1 person

      • MelH says:

        Didn’t we read early-on that Obama was running the country from his Bunker right close to the White House and/or Jared and Ivanka’s house and that Valerie Jarrett was living in that bunker too? He might have a large staff,for all we know. Gods knows he has endless money,a bottomless pit that continues to be fed by those he made deals with for 8 lucrative years. Mattis and Esper may have been well-paid to appear as traitors, among the many we have seen over the past 3 1/2 years that seem more like 20.

        Liked by 1 person

  43. WRB says:

    One early criticism of the study from Feb 06, 2020

    Why That Observational Study of Hydroxychloroquine in The Lancet Seems Fishy

    The conclusion of his article:

    I would feel bad about writing such a long aggressive post as this in that case. But it seems very unlikely. It is dreadful to think that the most likely explanation of what we’re seeing is simply that the data are fabricated, in what is possibly a criminal conspiracy, and the science publication process is so broken that it gets through. It just seems to me very likely that this explanation is the correct one.

    Liked by 1 person

    • MelH says:

      I was in the first year of my PhD program at UCSF when nothing was more discussed than the route to publishing Research, that being the major reason we were all getting the PhD in the first place. We were shown MANY examples of why and how Research found to be bogus happens too often but seldom gets punished. Plague of Corruption is a new book that will give you a whole new perspective on Research and Dr. Fauci.

      Liked by 1 person

  44. CountryDoc says:

    Very concerning what is happening to the medical profession, medical journals, and all things medical. To understand the divers for this all you need to know are these facts. The US economy and citizens of the united states spend 20% of our GDP (22 Trillion — remember there are Trillions at Stake) whichis ~ 4 Trillion on health care. We give that money, mostly to Medicare (elderly) (the largest business in the world) and Medicaid (you know for our poor and disabled and children) and to private insurance companies through our employers (much arbitytrated by unions).

    So 4 Trillion is sitting in the hands of insurance companies. Their profit depends on not spending it. The most powerful lobby groups (K street who writes laws) are Chamber of Commerce, Insurance industry, Large hospital corporations, Pharmaceuticals, and the AMA (which has been infiltrated with progressive leftist groups and no longer represents physicians or patients).

    Think about that — we give our health care money to companies whose profit depends on not spending it — supervised by a government who gets most of its money and lobbying influence and law writing from those same companies. It is no surprise that insurance companies now have all the power of decisionmaking, and all the data.

    The professionals we train to deliver the care — Physicians and nurses — no longer have power to decide. They are controlled by pay structure, red tape, faux quality programs designed to increase their power. And now most physicians are owned by large hospital systems, insurance companies, or companies owned by insurance companies.

    Areas of research depend on funding. Funding of research is decided on by the government, Universities (another government driven enterprise), and private investments.


  45. TiggerUSA17 says:

    It also sparked the only other Study done using the Surgisphere Data. The New England Journal of Medicine, did a study using the data “Cardiovascular Disease, Drug Therapy, and Mortality in Covid-19”:
    June 1st, They sent out a “Expression of Concern: Mehra MR et al. Cardiovascular Disease, Drug Therapy, and Mortality in Covid-19. N Engl J Med”.:
    Then on June 4th, Same thing as Lancet, Surgisphere refused a look at their Data. 2 for 2, and Out:
    “Retraction: Cardiovascular Disease, Drug Therapy, and Mortality in Covid-19. N Engl J Med. ”
    That makes Surgisphere’s Only two Medical studies they have ever had, Retracted Fully. They are definitely trying to beat the MSM, but I seriously doubt they will ever get another Customer. But then, thats the main purpose. As said in the article it looks like this Company was created Quickly in order to create more misinformation using the fake data in their fancy Database. Created just to stop Trump, and continue to push the fear & panic. Personally, ZI am begining to think this Virus was pushed by fear and panic with lies and misinfornation to boot. Thinking something else caused these illnesses. Some are saying 5G 60Hrz, which is what they were suggesting is what caused those Chinese , in WuZHan, to collapse in the streets. WuHan recently was fitted with brand new HuaWei 5G technology. The same Technology that the U.S. banned, and was supposed to have been removed in the U.S.
    Wana bet some people stepped in and left just certain areas in the U.S. with the WuHan 5G Weaponized and spying Technology in place, just for this outbreak? Just a wild idea. Would have to dig much deeper for some proof on that one. Its out there for WuHan, I read it. But proving someone left some of that HuaWei 5G in place after it had been banned in the U.S. that would be very tough to find or prove at this point. Unless it is still in place now.
    To msny other things that need to be researched lately. Maybe someone in NY or NJ could check the 5G in the areas that got hit hardest, to see if HuaWei tech is still in place. I am not near that area.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s