President Trump White House Coronavirus Task Force Briefing – Video and Transcript

President Trump, Vice-President Pence and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin lead the daily coronavirus briefing on COVID-19 mitigation efforts from the White House.

[Video Below – Transcript Added]


[Transcript] – THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much, everyone. Thank you. Progress being made. And I appreciate you all joining us.

Last night, the FDA announced groundbreaking new policies to further increase testing very substantially so. All states can now authorize tests developed and used within their borders, in addition to the FDA. So the states are very much involved. They have been involved from the beginning. But we’re stepping it up as much as we can, and the testing procedures are going well.

And within a short period of time, all other private labs will kick in. This has never been done before, and it’s going to be something very — I think it’s going to be incredible if it’s done properly. And these are great companies. These are among the greatest companies in the world, actually.

So the states are going to be dealing through themselves and with local government, local physicians, local everybody. They’re also dealing with us. But we have a tremendous testing capacity.

Today, we’re also announcing a dramatic expansion of our Medicare telehealth services. Medicare patients can now visit any doctor by phone or video conference at no additional cost, including with commonly used services like FaceTime and Skype — a historic breakthrough. This has not been done before either. In addition, states have the authority to cover telehealth services for their medical patients. And by doing this, the patient is not seeing the doctor, per se, but they’re seeing the doctor. So there’s no getting close.

During this time, we will not enforce applicable HIPAA penalties so that doctors can greatly expand care for their patients using telehealth. So the penalties won’t be enforced. We encourage everyone to maximize use of telehealth to limit exposure to the virus. It’s been a very successful method of communication but never used on a scale like we’re going to use on telehealth. And you’ll be able to also better maintain hospital capacity by doing this.

Earlier this morning, I spoke with executives from America’s fast-food industry — Wendy’s, McDonald’s, all of the big ones, Burger King — and they were great. We were talking about the pick-ups in light of yesterday’s guidance, you heard, to avoid eating or drinking at bars, restaurants, or public food courts. We discussed the important role that the drive-through, pick-up, and delivery service can play in the weeks ahead.

So that’s happening, and they have been fantastic. They have been absolutely fantastic. And they’ve been doing it already. But they’re keeping it open and smaller staffs. They’re very capable people and very capable companies, and they’re doing it, the pick-ups.

Our guidance yesterday urges Americans to take action for 15 days to help stem the outbreak. So it’s a 15-day period. I guess, now I would say it’s a 14-day period. It was 15 days from yesterday, and we’re asking everyone to work at home, if possible, postpone unnecessary travel, and limit social gatherings to no more than 10 people. By making shared sacrifices and temporary changes, we can protect the health of our people and we can protect our economy, because I think our economy will come back very rapidly. So it’s 15 days from yesterday. We’ll see what happens after that. If we do this right, our country — and the world, frankly — but our country can be rolling again pretty quickly. Pretty quickly.

We have to fight that invisible enemy that, I guess, unknown but we’re getting to know it a lot better.

Today, the Senate is taking up coronavirus legislation that includes free testing for those who need it, as well as paid sick leave and family medical leave for workers affected by the virus. We’re also committed to getting small businesses the support that they need. In fact, one of the things we talked about with the fast food operations — we spoke to the chairmen and CEOs of all of the companies — but one of the things we discussed is exactly that: getting small businesses support and flexibility that they need for themselves and for their workers, and that’s being worked on right now.

At my direction, Secretary Mnuchin is meeting today with senators on additional stimulus packages. I can tell you he was meeting with them late until the night, last night, and for a big part of the day yesterday, and tremendous things are happening. There’s great spirit. Tremendous spirit. And I can say that for Republicans and Democrats.

I can say that, with respect to Governor Cuomo, we had a great talk this morning. We’re both doing a really good job, and we’re coordinating it. And we agree — you know, different states need different things. And we — we agree on that 100 percent. But we had a very good talk, and I think we’re right down the same track, and it’s going to be very successful.

New York has a pretty big problem. I guess, would be the number one hotspot. It’s no fault of anybody. It’s just the way it is. But we’re working very closely together. We’re also getting FEMA very much involved. They’ve been involved, but now we’re getting them to a different level, and we’ll have everything ready. We’re dealing with the Army Corps of Engineers should that be necessary. We have them working, in some cases; on standby, in other cases.

But my conversation with Andrew Cuomo was a very, very productive one and a very good one. And I appreciate that.

We’re giving relief to affected industries and small businesses, and we’re ensuring that we emerge from this challenge with a prosperous and growing economy because that’s what’s going to happen. It’s going to pop. One day, we’ll be standing, possibly up here, and we’ll say, “Well, we won.” And we’re going to say that. As sure as you’re sitting there, we’re going to say that. And we’re going to win, and I think we’re going to win faster than people think, I hope.

Later today, I’ll meet with the leaders from the tourism industry, as well as industrial supply retailers and wholesalers, to discuss their critical roles. As you know, I met with the department store people, all of the retailers — the big ones, including Walmart and others — and it was a great meeting. They’re stocking up their stores like they’ve never stocked them before. We’re trying to get people to actually buy less if that’s possible. Buy less. Don’t take everything. Just buy what you need for a while. It’s — they’re going to stay open all hours of the day. And they’ve really been — they’ve been fantastic.

We’re taking aggressive action now as one nation and one family so that America can rebound stronger — frankly, stronger than ever before. And we recognize that while many American workers can work from home, many others cannot. Many of our healthcare providers, first responders, and men and women in the food service and manufacturing are showing at — they’re showing up and standing up to provide us with the goods and services we need.

So we want people to stay home where they can, but in many cases, when you talk about food service and manufacturing, certain items in particular, they are — they’re going in and they’re practicing all of the safety rules and regulations that we talk about.

So with that, I’d like to just introduce our great Vice President, Mike Pence. He’ll say a few words, and then I’ll make some other introductions.

Thank you very much.

THE VICE PRESIDENT: Thank you, Mr. President. Good morning. It should be very clear to the American people that President Trump has initiated not only a whole-of-government approach, but a whole-of-America approach. And the President’s interaction, even today and through the course of this day, with leaders in industry around the country, reflects that we’re not only bringing the full weight of the federal government to bear, but the full weight of the American economy.

And I know I speak on behalf of the President when I say how inspired we are at the way the American people have stepped up and the way that American businesses, large and small, have stepped up. It’s truly been inspiring.

Our task force met this morning. We continue to focus on President Trump’s priorities of testing, prevention, and supplies. And in that category, I’m pleased to report that while testing is available in all 50 states, as the President just indicated, through the swift action of the FDA, at the encouragement of governors around the country, now state health authorities can authorize labs in their state and expand existing testing capabilities.

But also in connection with the FDA’s action, which you’ll hear more about in a moment, we now have continued to expand the public and private partnership that the President forged with vast commercial laboratories around the country, increasing access to the high volume of high-throughput coronavirus testing that is greatly expanding access even as we speak.

Also, our task force received a report this morning on the progress that the U.S. Public Health Service and FEMA are making, working closely with state governments and also partners in the private sector like CVS, Target, Walgreen, and Walmart, to expand remote testing sites around the country. And we’ll have a full report later this week as those come online.

It’s important the American people understand that testing is happening all over the country. But all of our health experts wanted me to tell the American people you don’t need the results of testing to know what you should do. And President Trump’s 15-day coronavirus guidelines are advice for every American in every community. They’re the result of the best guidance of CDC and our health experts.

And, as the President said, we continue to urge every American over the next 15 days to put into practice the principles in the President’s coronavirus guidelines. By every American practicing these principles, we believe that we can slow the spread of the coronavirus. In fact, our experts have told our taskforce that if every American acts on the President’s coronavirus guidelines, we could see a substantial reduction in the spread of the coronavirus.

But as the President said, it will take all of us to do it. And so, if you feel sick, stay home. If someone in your house tests positive, keep the entire household home. Especially if you’re a person with an underlying health condition, we urge you to stay home and practice social distancing from people. No social gatherings of more than 10 people. Use drive-through, as the President discussed with leaders in the industry today. And every American, especially practicing common sense and good hygiene.

For the American people as a whole, the risk of serious illness remains low, but we’re asking every American to partner with us in this effort to slow the spread of the virus and especially to be mindful of seniors or others with serious underlying health conditions for whom the threat of the coronavirus can be very significant and very real.

As I said, the President has continued to push our task force to bring a whole-of-government, a whole-of-America approach. And we continue to be inspired the way our nation’s governors, the nation’s businesses are responding.

We spoke just yesterday with the leaders of every broadcast network in America that will soon be unveiling a public service campaign using CDC guidelines. And specifically, as we work on the issue of supplies — meetings yesterday with Department of Defense officials about excess supplies; the President and I will be meeting today to speak about the supply chain for hospitals — we would make one specific request, and that is: We would urge construction companies to donate their inventory of N95 masks to your local hospital and forego additional orders of those industrial masks.

Because of what the President asked to be included in legislation moving through the Congress today, those industrial masks that they use on construction sites are perfectly acceptable for healthcare workers to be protected from a respiratory disease.

But we’re asking construction companies that our President knows very well from his background — we’re asking them to donate their N95 masks to their local hospitals and also forego making additional orders.

At the President’s direction, we will — we will continue to do whatever it takes. We’ll continue to marshal the best of the American people, the best of all the people behind me, the people behind them, our state and local officials. And we will get through this, and we will get through this together.

Thank you, Mr. President.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, Mike, very much. Thank you.

THE PRESIDENT: I want to thank Chad Wolf and Homeland Security. The job they did at the airports was really incredible. They screened thousands and thousands of people. O’Hare got backed up, but — a little bit, but they got them out. But everybody was screened and screened very carefully. They didn’t want to rush it. I think it was 13 airports. And it was — it was an incredible thing. Then they had a big surge also from the UK and Ireland, and that went very smoothly. But they did a fantastic job. They worked long hours and they did a fantastic job.

I’d like to introduce Steve Mnuchin, and then I’m going to ask Steve to leave because he’s going to the Hill. He’s been working very hard with the Senate and with — actually, with the House on a very, very big, bold package. It’s going to be big and it’s going to be bold. And the level, again, of enthusiasm to get something done, I don’t think I’ve ever seen anything quite like it.

So, Steve Mnuchin, please.

SECRETARY MNUCHIN: Thank you, Mr. President. I’d like to announce some very significant actions that the President has approved today. The first, I would say, is: Earlier today, I sent a letter to Fed Chairman Powell approving his request to use 13(3). And what that will do is, the Fed will be setting up a special purpose vehicle, which the Treasury will invest $10 billion in from one of our funds. That will enable the Fed to guarantee the purchase of A1/P1 commercial paper going forward. That is a 1-trillion-dollar market and it is critical to American workers, it’s critical to American business, and it’s critical to American savers who have a lot of that money in money market funds.

So we heard, loud and clear, there were liquidity issues. This is very significant. And we’ll create — I don’t think we’ll need to use it all, but we have the ability to have the Fed purchase up to $1 trillion of commercial paper, as needed. That has already created significant stability in the market today.

The second thing I would say is, you know, we’ve previously talked about deferring IRS payments. The President, earlier this morning, authorized me to announce this program. I have previously announced we would defer $200 billion. The President suggested we increase that to $300 billion, which we will be doing.

Now, let me just be clear on the specifics: We encourage those Americans who can file their taxes to continue to file their taxes on April 15, because for many Americans, you will get tax refunds and we don’t want you to lose out on those tax refunds. We want you to make sure you get them. Many people do this electronically, which is easy for them and easy for the IRS.

If you owe a payment to the IRS, you can defer up to a million dollars as an individual. And the reason why we’re doing a million dollars is that covers lots of pass-throughs and small businesses, and $10 million to corporations, interest-free and penalty-free for 90 days. All you have to do is file your taxes. You’ll automatically not get charged interest in penalties.

Now, of course, any American has the right to extend their taxes. We’re not taking that right. But the President has asked us to go up to $300 billion. That’s also an enormous amount of liquidity in the system.

The third thing is the President and I worked on a very significant economic stimulus plan. Thank you for being available last night and throughout this morning. And I will be presenting that to the Republicans in the Senate this morning and also discussing that with the House.

We look forward to having bipartisan support. We’re now working with the Senate to pass this legislation very quickly. And these will be payments to small businesses. We’ve talked about loan guarantees to critical industries such as airlines and hotels. And we’ve also talked about a stimulus package to the American worker. You can think of this as something like business interruption payments for the American workers.

Thank you.

THE PRESIDENT: Do you have any questions for the Secretary of the Treasury?

Q When you say a stimulus package for American workers, do you mean direct payments to Americans, or are you talking about a payroll tax holiday?

SECRETARY MNUCHIN: Although the President likes the idea of the payroll tax holiday, I will tell you, what we’ve heard from many people — and the President has said we can consider this — the payroll tax holiday would get people money over the next six to eight months. We’re looking at sending checks to Americans immediately. And what we’ve heard from hardworking Americans, many companies have now shut down — whether it’s bars or restaurants. Americans need cash now, and the President wants to get cash now. And I mean now, in the next two weeks.

Q How much?

SECRETARY MNUCHIN: I will be previewing that with the Republicans. There’s some numbers out there. They may be a little bit bigger than what’s in the press.

THE PRESIDENT: Go ahead. Please.

Q Mr. Secretary —

THE PRESIDENT: Please. Wait. Please.

Q Secretary Mnuchin, what help are you going to give to airlines, specifically?

SECRETARY MNUCHIN: I’ve had discussions with all the airline CEOs this week. The airline CEOs have had conversations with the Senate and the House. As the President said, I was up with a subset of the Republican senators last night. I’ve discussed that with them.

I think, as you know, this is worse than 9/11. For the airline industry, this is — they are almost ground to a halt. The President wants to make sure that although we don’t want people to travel unless it’s critical, we want to maintain for critical travel the right to have domestic travel.

Q They want $60 billion dollars. Is that —

SECRETARY MNUCHIN: I’m not going to comment on the specifics. I will tell you, we’re very focused. There’s a lot of workers. This is strategically important to us and we’ll be working with Congress on this.

THE PRESIDENT: The airline industry will be in good shape.

Yeah. Go ahead, please.

Q There’s been talk about 1,000-dollar checks to every American. Increasing support among Republicans and some Democrats for that. Would you support that going to everyone? Or would you support some sort of income restriction on who gets a check?

SECRETARY MNUCHIN: Well, I think it’s clear: We don’t need to send people who make a million dollars a year checks. Okay? But we like — that’s one of the ideas we like. We’re going to preview that today, and then we’ll be talking about details afterwards.

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I think — I think we’re going to do something that gets money to them as quickly as possible. That may not be an accurate way of doing it, because obviously some people shouldn’t be getting checks for $1,000. And we’ll have a pretty good idea by the end of the day, what we’re going to be doing.

John, please.

Q Can you tell — how would the mechanics of this work? I mean, we’ve been talking about a payroll tax holiday. Some $500 billion worth was floated to me today. So how would this idea of sending people a check work? Would you — would that be sort of advance on what they would pay in payroll taxes? How would it work?

SECRETARY MNUCHIN: Again, we want to make sure Americans get money in their pockets quickly. We want to make sure small business owners have access to funds; we want to make sure that hotels, airlines. We have an entire package. We’ll be laying out those details later today.

THE PRESIDENT: Yeah, I have to say this: There are four different ways you can do it —

Q (Inaudible.)

THE PRESIDENT: That’s okay. Four — you can hear me well enough, I imagine.

Q I can, but it’s the people at home.

THE PRESIDENT: Okay. Oh, the people at home, you’re right. Those are very important people, come to think of it.

Q More important than us.

THE PRESIDENT: Especially your people.

Look, we have four or five ways we can do it — four ways in particular. I think there’s a fifth possibility. But there are some very good ways of getting the money out and getting it out quickly. A payroll tax is one way, but it does come over a period of months, many months, and we want to do something much faster than that. So I think we have ways of getting money out pretty quickly and very accurately.


Q Mr. Secretary, can you talk about the timeline, please? How quickly do you think you can get this done while there is broad bipartisan support?

SECRETARY MNUCHIN: The President has instructed me we have to do this now. So this is now. We —

Q By the end of the week?

SECRETARY MNUCHIN: Oh, we are going to work with the Senate, who’s in session right now, actively. We will continue to have conversations with the House. I’ve already spoken to Speaker Pelosi once today. This is stuff that needs to be done now.

The President has instructed me that this is no fault to American workers. For medical reasons, we are shutting down parts of this economy, and we’re going to use all the tools we have, as I’ve said. And what tools we don’t have, we’re going back to Congress.

Q And we’ve seen the price tag as high —

SECRETARY MNUCHIN: I got to go back to —

Q — as $850 billion. To those who might be concerned that’s too expensive?

THE PRESIDENT: We don’t want to talk about it, but it’s a substantial number. We’re going big. The expression — we could do it two ways; we could keep going back every day or every week. We’re going big. And that’s where Mitch McConnell — that’s the way he wants to go. That’s the way I want to go. I think we want to get it done and have a big infusion as opposed to going through little meetings every — every couple of days. We don’t want to do it that way. We want to go big, go solid.

The country is very strong. We’ve never been so strong. And that’s what we’re going to be doing. We don’t want — with this invisible enemy, we don’t want airlines going out of business. We don’t want people losing their jobs or not having money to live, when they were doing very well just four weeks ago.

So we’re going big, and that’s the way it’ll be. And that’s the way everybody seems to like it on the Hill.

Any other question for Steve?

Q Mr. Secretary, in addition to airlines and hotels, you had a call with restaurants today. Was any type of emergency assistance discussed on that call? A lot restaurants have to close. Even, if they are doing delivery, they’re not making as much money as they would with a full house.

SECRETARY MNUCHIN: Well, let me make two comments on the restaurants. And the President understands this; this was emphasized this morning.

First of all, we want to make sure that the states allow the drive-through portion of these fast foods to stay open. Particularly in a time period where we’re telling people “don’t go to restaurants,” these companies feed a big part of America, and I expect they’re going to feed a bigger part of America.

The second thing they asked me to emphasize — I wasn’t going to do it now, but as long as you asked — many of these companies have apps. You can order ahead of time. That way, when you get there, it’s as simple as they’ll have it packed. They can give it to you with social distancing, and it’ll be very fast.

So we expect that they will be able to feed a large part of the population. And in regards to support, I will say a lot of these businesses are small businesses — are companies, franchisees, 500 or less — and we have a specific program we’ll be unveiling that helps all business — small- and medium-sized businesses of 500 and less.

Q Mr. Secretary, a real quick question regarding Marriott Corporation. It announced that it is furloughing thousands of individuals because of the impacts of the coronavirus. Will your legislation help those individuals?

SECRETARY MNUCHIN: I hope so. That’s one of the reasons why we got to act very quickly, because we understand whether it’s the airlines, hotels — for good reasons to protect the United States on medical issues, these businesses are shut down. And the President wants to make sure, as I’ve said, we will use all the powers we have. You saw this today: trillion dollars of potential liquidity into the market. And the powers we don’t have, we’re going to Congress. And I will say there’s a lot of bipartisan support for these issues.

So I’m going to apologize because I have to go deal with some other things, if that’s okay, Mr. President.

Q Will you consider shutting down the stock market?

THE PRESIDENT: Thanks, Steve.

SECRETARY MNUCHIN: Oh, yeah, I — this —


SECRETARY MNUCHIN: I do want to comment on this. Okay? We absolutely believe in keeping the markets open. Okay? Americans need to know they have access to their money. After September 11th, the only reason why the markets were closed was because the technology was disrupted. I’ve been on the phone with the major banks, with the New York Stock Exchange. Everybody wants to keep it open. We may get to a point where we shorten the hours, if that’s something they need to do.

But Americans should know that we are going to do everything to make sure that they have access to their money at their banks, to the money in their 401(k)s, and to the money in stocks. So I want to just be very clear, we intend to keep the markets open.

THE PRESIDENT: And the banks are record-setting strong. So we have — we have that, which is a much different event than what we had not so long ago.

John, go ahead, please.

Q Mr. President, you mentioned the Army Corps of Engineers —


Q — and that you’ve had a conversation with Governor Cuomo.


Q He believes that New York is going to run out of hospital beds. Are you prepared to mobilize the Army Corps —

THE PRESIDENT: Well, we’ve been asked to, and we’re —

Q — to increase capacity?

THE PRESIDENT: Yes, we’re starting to. We’re starting the process. And it’s a process — we hope it’s not going to be necessary, but it could be necessary. The state is working on it very hard themselves, but we’ll probably supplement what they’re doing.

Q And given that many of the precursors for our pharmaceuticals come from China, and there have been disrupt- — there have been supply disruptions — that supply chain has been broken to some degree — do you expect that we could run into a shortage of prescription drugs?

THE PRESIDENT: No, I don’t see that at all. And I think China has every incentive to make sure that things work well. China wants to make sure that things work very well. They have every incentive to do so.


Q Mr. President, the governor of Ohio has called off the election that was supposed to happen today — the primary election. Do you agree with that decision? And what steps are you taking to ensure that elections going forward — if this pandemic continues — that elections will be able to happen, including, of course, the big one in the fall?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, the governor of Ohio is doing a great job. He called that off, and we’ll see what happens. There’s a court case, and it hasn’t been fully determined yet. But if he called it off, I could understand that because, you know, he — he’s definitely somebody that knows what he’s doing.

We’ll be seeing what — very soon. You know, they’re going by the rule of 10 as opposed to 50, and that’s pretty tough. I would say, probably, you could violate that if you wanted to for an election. I just think an election is a very special thing. He’s going to choose — he chose a different date. I think a date that sometime in June.

But that would be a decision that would be made by him. He felt it was necessary. The courts are — somebody is challenging it. So the courts will ultimately decide.

Q But what are you doing to ensure that further elections — if we’re still in this situation a month from now, two months from now —

THE PRESIDENT: Yeah. What I’m doing —

Q — do you suggest to July? What do we do?

THE PRESIDENT: What I’m going, Jon, is very simple. We’re getting rid of this virus. That’s what we’re doing. That’s the best thing we can do.

By the way, for the markets, for everything — it’s very simple, very simple solution. We want to get rid of it. We want to have very — as few deaths as possible. This is a horrible thing.

You look at what’s going on with Italy. We don’t want to be in a position like that. But a much larger — because we’re a much larger country. We don’t want to be there.

And I think we’ve done really well. I think we’ve done well. I think the states have done well. We’re all working together. The best thing we can do is get rid of the virus. Once that’s gone, it’s going to pop back like nobody has ever seen before. That’s my opinion, but I think it’ll pop back like nobody has ever seen before.


Q Mr. President, just to follow up on John’s question: Specifically, how many new hospital facilities could the Army Corps of Engineers build? And also, what specific measures are you taking to try to increase the number of ventilators in the stockpiles?

THE PRESIDENT: Right. We’ve ordered massive numbers of ventilators. We have — by any normal standards, we have a lot of respirators, ventilators. We have tremendous amounts of equipment. But compared to what we’re talking about here, this has never been done before.

And yesterday I gave the governors the right to go order directly if they want, if they feel they can do it faster than going through the federal government.

Now, we’ve knocked out all of the bureaucracy; it’s very direct, but it’s still always faster to order directly. And I gave them — that was totally misinterpreted by the New York Times, on purpose, unfortunately.

But the — but it’s very important.

Yes, Mike.

THE VICE PRESIDENT: If I could amplify —

THE PRESIDENT: Yeah, please. Yeah.

THE VICE PRESIDENT: Thank you. The President directed us to work with the Department of Defense. There’s two ways that DOD can be helpful, in terms of expanding medical capacity. I know the governor of New York has asked us to look at the Army Corps of Engineer, which could perhaps renovate existing buildings. But the President also has us inventorying what you all would understand as field hospitals, or MASH hospitals, that can be deployed very quickly.

We spoke with Governor Inslee yesterday in Washington State. We have resources in that part of the country that we can move. And as governors make these requests, we will process them, bring them to the President.

But there are two different lanes that DOD can provide, in addition to many medical supplies to augment our national reserves. And the President has tasked us to evaluate, make available, and to consider every — every request from governors for either field hospitals, expanding facilities, or the Army Corps of Engineer that could retrofit existing buildings.

THE PRESIDENT: The Army Corps is very prepared to do as we say. And we’re looking at where it’s going.

But — and they do call them MASH hospitals, but the field hospitals go up very quickly. They’re — we have them. We have all of this equipment in stock. And we’re looking at different sites in a few different locations.

And we’re not going to need them in West Virginia where, so far, I guess they have none. Still none? Still none, right? West Virginia.

Q No known cases.

THE PRESIDENT: Big Jim, the governor, is — he must be doing a good job.

Q Or is that just reported?

THE PRESIDENT: That’s what’s reported. They —

Q No, no, but is that a reporting issue or is that that they have no cases?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, that’s all that — I just see West Virginia is the only one that has no cases. So, obviously, that’s being treated differently than a New York or a California — different parts of California.

I do say this, though: The Army Corps of Engineers is ready, willing, and able. We have to give them the go-ahead if we find that it’s going to be necessary. We think we can have quite a few units up very rapidly. I’m going to work with Governor Cuomo. I’m going to work with a number of the governors. Governor Newsom has been very generous in his words, and I’m being generous to him, too, because we’re all working together very well. And I think a lot of very positive things have taken place. We’re talking to California about different sites. But we can have a lot of units up fairly quickly if we think we need them.

Q Mr. President, to follow up on —

THE PRESIDENT: I think what I’ll do is, I might ask Seema to say a few words on the telehealth, and then we can back to this.

Please. Seema?

ADMINISTRATOR VERMA: Thank you, Mr. President. And as the President announced earlier, we are doing a dramatic expansion of what’s known as telehealth for our 62 million Medicare beneficiaries who are amongst the most vulnerable to the coronavirus. And we’re acting in accord with the appropriations bill that was signed on March 6th, as well as the President’s emergency declaration last week.

And this action is a part of our broader effort to ensure that government requirements, rules, and regulations don’t get in the way of patient care during an emergency. And today’s announcement builds on the significant progress that the President has already made over the past three years around telehealth services.

And while we have allowed for virtual check-ins, full telehealth benefits have been restricted to those living in rural areas, established patients, and just for those brief visits. But no longer.

Medicare beneficiaries across the nation, no matter where they live, will be able to receive a wide range of services via telehealth without ever having to leave home. And these services can also be provided in a variety of settings, including nursing homes, hospital outpatient apartments, and more.

And thanks to the leadership of HHS, we’ll also be temporarily relaxing certain HIPAA requirements so that doctors can provide telehealth with their own phones. And we’ll be using enforcement discretion when it comes to collecting co-pays so that cost won’t be a barrier.

This a part of our larger efforts around mitigation. And as we are encouraging Americans to stay home whenever possible, we don’t want our Medicare policies getting in the way. And so consider the implications of this: Perhaps an elderly patient with diabetes needs a routine check-up, and this has nothing to do with the coronavirus. And so, with our new telehealth benefits, this person who is not really — who is at risk for the coronavirus doesn’t have to venture outside their home. They can talk to their doctor via Skype, and they don’t have to risk exposure to the virus, and they can receive that care from the safety of their own home.

It could be another Medicare recipient who is experiencing mild flu-like symptoms, and instead of leaving the house and sitting in a waiting room full of other vulnerable people, they can also receive advice from their doctor, from their home.

And this shift is very important for clinicians and providers who, over the coming weeks, will face considerable strain on their time and resources. And now, Medicare patients who don’t absolutely need to come in to an office won’t have to. And this allows the healthcare system to prioritize for care for those that are more — that have more needs or are in dire need, and preserves protective equipment as well.

State Medicaid agencies can also provide telehealth services without federal approval. And so we’re asking all states to make this available as well. And we’ve also asked private insurance companies to expand their telehealth benefits and make it clear to their providers and their members what they cover.

As our nation seeks to balance the twin imperatives of getting Americans the care that they need during this outbreak, and limiting the spread of the virus, the impact of this historic action simply cannot be overstated. In an emergency, those on the frontlines shouldn’t have to worry about federal rules and red tape hamstringing them when they need flexibility above all else. And we’re doing everything in our power to make sure that that doesn’t happen.

I also just want to briefly mention that because of the President’s emergency declaration, we do have the ability to provide a lot of Medicaid waivers, and Florida was the first state to be approved. We were able to do that in a matter of days.

Thank you.

THE PRESIDENT: Any questions? Please.

Q Yeah. Where do citizen seniors go for instructions on how to do the telehealth?

ADMINISTRATOR VERMA: They should call their doctor’s office, and their doctor’s office can tell them how to do that. Also, you know, there may be some of our Medicare members that may not have access to equipment, so we’re asking family members to help with this, but also respecting the requirements around social distancing. And if any of those family members or neighbors have symptoms, they should obviously stay away.

THE PRESIDENT: Will you be posting numbers also?

ADMINISTRATOR VERMA: That’s correct. Exactly.

THE PRESIDENT: That might be the easiest way to do it — if you post in ads, if you post some numbers.

ADMINISTRATOR VERMA: And they can also call our 1-800-MEDICARE number and they can also get information. Those phone lines are open.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you. Thank you very much.

Admiral, if you’d say a few words about where we’re going, and then I’d like to ask Dr. Birx to say a couple of words about how the system is working.

ADMIRAL GIROIR: Well, thank you very much. As we talked about earlier this week, the commercial system is rapidly advancing in the testing capabilities. As of today, our public health laboratories — meaning the CDC and the public health labs — have reported out 31,878 tests. So almost 32,000 tests.

The clinical laboratories — the Association of Clinical Laboratories — have reported out about 27,000 tests. And most importantly, of those 27,000 during the cumulative period of time, 8,200 of them were yesterday. This is showing the dramatic ramp as the high-throughput comes in.

We don’t have the numbers this morning from the American Hospital Association, which means all of the individual hospital laboratories. We will have that upcoming in the next day or so. And then Ambassador Birx will have this whole process fixed under — with the legislation that everything will roll up into a common reporting, probably by the end of next week.

In terms of our drive-through laboratories, again, these are blossoming all over the country by individual states. The ones that we are heavily involved in, in really pushing equipment to, we expect over the next few days to begin setting up 47 of these in approximately 12 states. The material is already palletized and being shipped to the locations. Most cities have the specific locations, some do not, but it’s still going to a central receiving.

And we know that we’ll be deploying at least 140 Commissioned Corps Officers. About half of the sites have reported their requirements. About 140 officers will be going. We expect that to go up. So this is going on the way we expected.

We did a trial site yesterday with a full mobile unit for drive-through, with full PPE. We had a lot of kinks in the system, as you can expect. That’s why we do a test before we go out into the field. Don’t expect these to be 100 percent perfect the moment they come. They’re going to be adapted to the state and the local situation, but we’re very confident that these will add testing to the already very robust healthcare system and commercial system.

Thank you, Mr. President.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much. Thank you, Admiral.

And this has never been done before. And it sets a great roadmap for future, should we have something like this in the future. I hope we don’t. But it’s never been done before, and they’ve done an incredible job.

Again, we’re working with the states and relying on the states. We have to because they — they have — it’s point of sale, it’s point of site. And we’re in, I think, just about every instance, getting along really well with the states.

If I could, Dr. Birx, if you could say a couple of words, please.

DR. BIRX: Great. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. President. So I think what you’ve been hearing from us is to find solutions that are high quality and sustainable based on the frontline workers and governors’ requests. And I — those come in on the governors call. We’ve been immediately responsive to those. And that’s the level of red tape and bureaucracy that we have removed.

I think that point about sustainability and quality is very important. Because, as the President says, we’re creating a roadmap for a different level of functionality for future pandemics. Our flu-pandemic preparedness plan was a plan. Now we’re seeing where we have to revise, where we have to create new avenues of research, new avenues of work to really ensure that the need of the American people can be reached.

We were adamant about having a high-quality test based on our commercial vendors. Over the next few months, you will begin to see that other tests that were utilized around the world were not of the same quality, resulting in false positives and potentially false negatives. These tests were studied, and studied by the FDA, to really ensure that they are that level of quality. And we’ve given the states the permission to ensure that same level of quality.

Now, I wanted to say, one minute on the testing: Testing should not be used as an assessment of your risk. We are asking every single American, no matter what your generation, from Z and up to X, and millennials in between, to really ensure that you’re following these guidelines. We hear every night of people who are not in work, moving that time into bars and other areas of large gatherings.

If we continue with that process, we will fail in containing this virus. So every single generation has a role to play. We’re asking our older generation to stay in their homes. And we’re asking the younger generations to support them in social contacting through videos and other Skype-type functions, or just the simple telephone.

We’re asking the younger generations to stop going out in public places — to bars and restaurants — and spreading asymptomatic virus onto counter tops and knobs and grocery stores and grocery carts.

I heard an innovation last night and this morning again on the news. I really want to applaud the private sector who are now creating senior-only shopping times. I think that’s extraordinary. I think that shows what America brings. And I think other countries will learn from us about how to really protect seniors in this type of way.

I’m hoping that carries through to next year when we have our flu epidemic, where we can really have a very different profile of the amount of mortality that we have during flu that we never talk about. Anywhere from 15,000 to 45,000 individuals are lost every year. If we learn how to do this well, and sustain some of those core changes, we can change the way respiratory viruses — not only for this, but the future — affect Americans.

THE PRESIDENT: It’s a big thing. Right, Doctor? Maybe a couple of questions.

Yes, Jim.

Q A question on the clinical data. So we’ve had now roughly 5,000 people test positive. We’ve had 90 deaths or so. When are we going to know the data of who those people are; who has been infected; what the ages are; what the preexisting conditions are; how serious it was, both for those who have been tested positive but also those who have died?

DR. BIRX: Well, you’re singing my sheet of music. I’m very data oriented. So thank you for bringing up this issue of data. I really want to applaud HHS. We had a discussion about this several days ago. They’ve made calls into Seattle and California to really understand that, and also, importantly, to understand how many of their patients needed ventilators, how many of them needed oxygen support, how many of them needed and what they needed. Could we predict, early, someone who was going to have a more difficult course? These are all the questions we’re asking right — and answering right now.

We did get an early report back from Santa Clara and Seattle. We’re digesting it. We just got it this morning. We’re looking at that carefully because we think that roadmap is very important to other communities. We have not discussed this with New York yet.

We do know from other countries — and that all is available online, that profile — you can see that mortality under 30 is extraordinarily low. The mortality across the board, outside of Wuhan, is now settling somewhere around 0.7. But that should not be reassuring because it’s much higher in people with preexisting medical conditions, even if young, and people that are older with preexisting medical conditions.

And so we still want every American focused on doing what they can do today to change the course of this pandemic.

Q Will you commit to making that data public so we will all know?

DR. BIRX: We’re committed not only to making it public but to have a website that everyone can see in real time.

THE PRESIDENT: Please, John. Him.

Q Dr. Birx, if I could just follow up. You all are signaling a much more aggressive posture toward containment and mitigation now. And many states have been very aggressive, but there is a small number of states that have not issued public guidance to their residents. Is it important for the success of the effort that 100 percent of the states be forward leaning on this? And, if so, Mr. President, what would be your message to those states that have not?


DR. BIRX: So that’s why the Vice President and the President, yesterday, issued those critical guidelines. As I said this morning on “Fox and Friends,” you can look at them as guidelines, you can look at them as requirements, and you can look at them as the President asking every American and every state to follow those.

That’s why we put them out at the federal level. We wanted to make sure every American knew what they could do today to change the course of this epidemic. I think it’s empowering. I think it says all of us have a social responsibility to each other, and that’s why we believe that every mayor and every governor should be instituting these guidelines that came from the White House and the President of the United States.

THE PRESIDENT: And we’ve been very tough on those states. I know exactly who you’re talking about. We’ve been very tough on them. Thank you.

Please, go ahead.

Q A follow-up question on the testing. You’ve been telling us for days now that millions of tests have been sent out. So why have fewer than 60,000 people actually been tested?

DR. BIRX: I think you will see different numbers this week. You heard just of 8,000. Remember, all of these tests — the high-speed tests were approved last Friday — last Friday night and last Thursday night.

I think if I could talk to Thermo Fisher and the other groups that have these platforms out there: Do not rely on a pull technology. Push out those tests. Because we can only make them available. Groups have to order them. So I — we’ve been talking to Thermo Fisher, one of the key platforms, to push out tests based on need, and not wait for orders.

Q Is that where the issue is, getting the tests out? Or is it getting the test conducted?

DR. BIRX: That’s a great question. I know part of it is getting the test out right now. I think the Admiral and others are working on getting the issues related to getting the test conducted. Obviously, that does take time. He is working on innovative solutions that are creative and sustainable that will be a game-changer in testing. But we don’t have the data yet. This is a critical comparator. Can you do it yourself? Can you actually sample yourself? These are the kinds of things we’re working on right now, and he’s getting the data for us.

THE VICE PRESIDENT: It’s coming online (inaudible).

THE PRESIDENT: And the states are actually doing a lot of this. The governors and the states are doing a lot of it with even our tests.

Yeah, go ahead. Go ahead, please.

Q Okay, thank you. Can you give us a sense of how long these tough, new restrictions will need to be in place until we start to see the rate of this virus going down?

Also, can you speak to this study that as many as 2.2 million people in the United States could die if there weren’t this type of action by the government taken? To what extent did that prompt what we saw yesterday?

DR. BIRX: So, I think, you know, models are models. And they’re based on input, and they’re based on infectiousness without any controls. I can tell you we’ve never seen that level of infections that modeled up to that 2.2 million in mortality.

So we are looking at that. We are having a particularly model meeting tomorrow. I think that’s really going to be important. I’ve dealt with a lot of modelers in my time. They’re wonderful people, but they all have their favorite inputs, and they all have their favorite integration functions. So we’re evaluating all of those so we can integrate and create the best model for the United States based on the best data. And that first set of recommendations you saw were based on what we could do today to prevent anything that looks like that.

If I could just say one other thing to the hospitals and dentists out there: Things that don’t need to be done over the next two weeks, don’t get it done. If you’re a person with an electric sur- — elective surgery, you don’t want to go into a hospital right now. There’s a lot of distraction. There’s a lot of people doing a lot of other things to save people’s lives. So let’s all be responsible and cancel things that we can cancel to really free up hospital beds and space, and then let’s do everything that we can to ensure that we don’t need the ventilators because we protected the people who would have needed to use them.

Q And are you looking at the possibility of more actions like, for example, limiting travel within the United States? Are you looking —

THE PRESIDENT: It’s possible. It’s possible. We’ll see how it goes. I think a lot of — there’s been great cooperation with local governments, states. We’ll see how it goes. It’s going — it’s going, right now, pretty well.

Yeah, please go ahead.

Q And, Mr. President, a quick follow on that, Mr. President. Very quickly.

THE PRESIDENT: Please. Yeah.

Q Just very quickly.


Q Do you need to invoke the Defense Production Act to get more of those medical supplies to different hospitals across the country?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, we’re able to do that if we have to. Right now, we haven’t had to, but it’s certainly ready. If I want it, we can do it very quickly. We’ve studied it very closely over two weeks ago, actually. We’ll make that decision pretty quickly if we need it. We hope we don’t need it. It’s a big step.

Q But as the states say they need more help from the federal government when it comes to those supplies, what do you say to those governors?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, when you say the states — in particular, three states need some help. And some states, you know, have two people, three people — no people, in the case of, again, West Virginia.

So we’re looking at it very closely. We’ve taken it apart 15 different ways. It’s a very difficult thing to do. It’s a very big step. And if we need that step, we’ll take it, okay?

Q A quick follow-up to Kristen’s first question. A lot of people have got travel to places that aren’t considered hotspots — Caribbean, Mexico, that sort of thing — over the next few weeks. Would you recommend that they follow through with these plans?

THE PRESIDENT: I would just say: Enjoy your home. Stay. I would just say, right now, we — we have to get this problem fixed, and then we’ll get back into business really quick. We’ll open up our country, we’ll open up our society. The world will hopefully open up.

We see areas of the world that are — that haven’t done well, and we see areas that are doing very well. And I would put us in the category of doing very well for a country so big. I think that I would recommend that they just enjoy their living room.


Q Mr. President —

Yeah, go ahead. Please.

Q What do you say to people who are not heeding these guidelines from the White House? And then, also, I have a question on asymptomatic people that Dr. Birx —

THE PRESIDENT: Yeah, sure. I’m not happy with those people if they’re not. But, you know, those people are being shouted down by other people. They know it. They’re being — it’s almost like self-policing. People went in, and there are couple of instances, I guess — probably more than a couple — where people are not happy when they see others doing what they’re not supposed to be doing.

We have to get rid of this. We have to win this war, and, ideally, quickly. Quickly. Because the longer it takes, it’s not a good situation. And I’m not even talking about the economy. I’m talking about the lives of a lot of people.

Yeah, please. Did you have one?

Q Will the White House put any restrictions on corporate bonuses for companies that do get bailed out, like airlines?

THE PRESIDENT: I’m going to ask — I think I’m going to ask Mike. Answer that question, please.

THE VICE PRESIDENT: I think it’s all a work in progress. What President Trump has made clear to industries around the country is that we’re going to do whatever it takes. We understand this is an extraordinary moment in the life of our nation. It’s the reason why the President brought in leaders of the financial sector, the airline industry. He’ll meet with all additional industry leaders today in tourism and hospitality.

But he has tasked the Secretary of the Treasury to work with members of Congress in both parties to make sure that we construct the kind of economic support that will allow those industries to weather the period of the coronavirus and then to come back stronger than ever before.

THE PRESIDENT: We’ve had — we’ve had such incredible — I don’t know, it’s almost the word “spirit” is the best word. It’s like a spirit.


THE PRESIDENT: The banks have come in and the banks are doing things that they would have never done. They’re working on extensions and lots of things that they wouldn’t have done.

Co-pays, with regard to the insurance companies — I mean, for them to be doing what they’re doing — and you know all about the co-pays — they would have never done that, and they did it. They were in my office. They — I would say the 11 biggest in this country; I guess, probably, the 11 biggest in the world. The big ones, all the big ones. And they — they did things on co-pay that nobody would be doing, that they wouldn’t have done in a million years, but they’re doing it. There’s a great spirit going on right now in the country.

So you want — yes, please.

Q A question for Dr. Fauci. Dr. Fauci, you’ve said you like being accused of overreacting because that is an indication we may be doing things necessary to beat this, bend the curve. How long do you think it will take for you to be confident that, yes, we’re bending the curve or, no, we’re not?

DR. FAUCI: You know, I can’t give you a firm number on that because the dynamics of outbreaks, in some respects, are predictable. Historically, they do this and that. We don’t know because this is really unprecedented.

I mean, of all the outbreaks that I’ve been involved with over the last, at least, 36 years, and then going historically back, we’ve never had a situation where the mobilization of all the different components: travel restrictions, internal containment, mitigation, financial assistance, public health assistance, testing. So we don’t really know.

But the one thing I do know: I do know that if you look at models, with all of their vicissitudes of models, is that when you have input into the kinds of mitigations and things that we’re doing, we’re going to see a hump instead of a peak.

I would be really surprised if all the things that we’re doing — and this is, really, comprehensive approach. I was struck as I was listening to everyone make their — their presentations that, you know, I’m a scientist, I’m a health person, and I’m a physician who sees patients. So I look at it from one particular standpoint. But what I’m being impressed by is that this is really a comprehensive thing that has multiple components to it. All of them got to succeed if we’re going to get to that endpoint that I’ve described multiple times from this podium.

So I hope that if everyone does their job, we’re going to be able to give you a number and say, “You know, we’ve seen that inflection and we’re coming down.” I would hesitate to do it now, to be honest with you, because it might be misleading and I don’t want to be misleading.

I just want to say one other thing, because I heard Dr. Birx say it, and I think we need to say it over and over again: When I was young — a long time ago — I felt that I was invulnerable the way I think many of us feel we’re invulnerable. And when we’re asking the young people to help us with this mitigation strategy by staying out of the bars, staying out of the restaurants, really trying to distance yourself, don’t get the attitude, “Well, I’m young, I’m invulnerable.” You are — well, in some respects, you’re certainly less vulnerable than I am. However, what you might inadvertently do — and I know you don’t want to do that — you don’t want to put your loved ones at risk, particularly the ones who are elderly and the ones who have compromised conditions.

We can’t do this without the young people cooperating. Please cooperate with us. Thank you.

Q Dr. Fauci —

Q Mr. President —


Q Dr. Fauci — and I’m going to use my notes so I get this right, but there’s apparently a new study out of China. It found that the vast majority of cases — 86 percent — were in untested patients with mild to no symptoms. So what does that say about the impact of testing? And does it mean that testing should actually go beyond the sickest patients?

DR. FAUCI: You know, that question keeps coming up, and I’m not going to evade the question, but I want to make a point. We tend to think that we’re not going to be able to mitigate or contain without testing. They complement each other in some respects, but they’re separate channels. Even if we had no testing, we should be doing what we’re doing now.

The question you’re asking — so I won’t evade — is specifically: Would it be important, outside of a doctor, patient coming in together, of knowing what’s out there; what might be under the radar screen? The answer to your question is “yes.”

So let me tell you what the CDC is doing right now. They’re going out there, and part of their program is to get a feel for what is there that wasn’t initially thought to be coronavirus, that was thought to be something else. When you do that, you’re also going to get a feel of what the penetrance is in society. So we are heading with the high-throughput things that you’ve been hearing about to get an answer to your question.

Q Dr. Fauci, Governor Cuomo said this morning he believes that we’ll see a peak in terms of infection in 45 days. Would you concur with that?

DR. FAUCI: You know, it’s possible. I mean, I know the Governor has been really, I believe, doing a really good job of trying to stay ahead of this. Forty-five days is not unreasonable. You have to be careful. When you get a number, you own the number. And then if the number doesn’t come out, you’re in trouble.

And that’s the reason why, from our standpoint, from the federal government, we’re talking about a range. So within that range — I mean, it isn’t like you want to be correct for the sake of being correct, but you don’t want to be wed to something and then have to back off.

THE PRESIDENT: Go ahead, please.

Q When is the soonest that we’ll know that these new guidelines are actually bending the curve or actually working? And is there a point in time where, you know, in the next couple of weeks, where you’ll be able to tell the President more draconian measures are needed?

DR. FAUCI: Well, okay, so what’s happening — I mean, if you look as a metaphor, it’s kind of like a race against the virus. If left to its own devices, we’ll do this. And us trying to somehow blunt that.

Now, you could see the virus going up and up, and your effect, your work — what you’re trying to do — may actually be having an effect, but you may not see it because it’ll still be going up. And as you’re trying to implement your interference with the virus, you may not realize that you are actually interfering, and you’ll say, “Wait a minute, it’s still going up. What’s going on? You’ve done nothing.” But you don’t know whether it would do this versus that.

So the answer to your question: It probably would be several weeks and maybe longer before we know whether we’re having an effect.

It may be, at the end of the day, we’ll see a curve that would have been way, way up. But I wouldn’t, like, put us to task every few days: “Well, wait a minute, it’s going up. Is it working or not?” That would be really misleading if we do that.

Q Dr. Fauci —

Q I have a question —

THE PRESIDENT: Go ahead. Go ahead.

Q Regarding the 15-day guidelines which were announced yesterday, one of those guidelines was a recommendation against gatherings of 10 or more people. And today, the governor of Alabama issued her own guidelines, and it was a recommendation against gatherings of 25 or more people. What is your recommendation for people of Alabama, people across all of the country, as far as the guidelines that were announced yesterday by the federal government?

DR. FAUCI: Okay, so the one thing we don’t want to do is to get hung up on the difference between 10 and 25. I think you might agree with that. When we give guidelines, they’re only guidelines. We sit down, we look at the data — as Dr. Birx said, we’re data-driven — and we say, “On different models, 10 looks good.”

If someone wants to do 25, we’re not going to fault them, but if someone wants to come to us, ask us what we think is the best is, we stand by the numbers. It isn’t perfect. It isn’t precise math. It’s assumptions and it’s data that make you get your decision.

Q But would it be more effective if every state and every city in the country was playing by the same rules instead of different?

DR. FAUCI: Yes. Of course. But this is the United States of America. There’s a lot of free enterprise there. People do their own thing. And quite frankly, I don’t think there’s a big-deal difference between 10 and 25. We got many, many more important things to worry about than that difference.

Q Mr. President, thank you. Going back to supply chains and then talking about preparedness for the future, yesterday, Larry Kudlow said that there is an idea floating around the administration to cut taxes for companies who would be bringing their supply chains back to the United States. He said he specifically liked immediate 100 percent write-offs for —


Q — structures, equipment. But he said you hadn’t endorsed that yet. Would you endorse an idea like that?

THE PRESIDENT: We’re looking at many ideas. That’s one of them, frankly. And we’re looking at creating incentives for companies — not only that type of company, but other companies.

We’re also looking to help companies, such as the airline industry — within the airline industry. And we’ll be doing that. We will be doing that. This is not their fault. And they’ve been very understanding, actually. And we’re going to be helping them. We will have a very powerful airline industry, and it’ll start up as soon as this is over. We’ll — we’ll have those — we’ll have those planes ready to go. So we have to help them during the short term with — very important.

Yeah, please.

Q Thank you, Mr. President. I wanted to know, have you taken a look at some of these models, such as the Imperial College London model, that kind of poses a very difficult choice, whether it’s shutting down society or overwhelming the healthcare system?


Q Is that something that you took into consideration?

THE PRESIDENT: We look at every model. We’ve relied on the very talented people. And there’s no better team than the people behind me. And I will say that all of the people that have done those models are all in constant touch with Dr. Birx and Tony and everybody that you’ve been hearing so much from over the last couple of weeks.

We’ve looked at — we’ve looked at many different models. And the model we have is, we want to save a lot of lives. We want to save a lot of lives. If we get too steep on that curve, you’re going to lose a lot of lives, perhaps unnecessarily.

Now, we’re going to find out. Everything has a risk. We’re going to see. But if people do what we’re telling them to do, what we’re asking them to do, you’re going to see the saving of a lot of lives.

Now, Boris, in UK yesterday — you saw what happened — it looked like they were going a different way, but then he went a way of similar — I guess similar — I don’t know exactly. But I would say we had a conversation yesterday, similar to what we’re doing.

So a lot of people seem to think this is going to be — we are — we are looking to save the maximum number of lives. Everything else is going to come back. A life is never going to come back. But everything else — our economy is going to come roaring back.

You’re going to know, we’re going to know — we’re going all know that day. Somebody was asking about the day, “When will you know? When will you know?” We’re going to know. All of a sudden, we’re going to say, “Wow, that’s looking good. That’s looking good. That’s looking good.” And we’re going to be on the other side of the curve. And that’s a day that we look forward to. Okay?

Q Is there something, sir, that you saw this week though that did — that made you decide that, yes, now is the time to implement these much more stringent social distancing measures? This week, sir.

THE PRESIDENT: No, I don’t think so. This is where we were going. I really think, from the beginning, this is where we were going. This is what we had in mind. We were just — we’re just going step by step. That was the next step — the next logical step.

As Dr. Fauci said — and I think very importantly — one of the most important things, when you write the history of this, was the fact that we closed it down to China and Europe, but in particular, China. We closed it down to China, the source, very, very early. Very, very early. Far earlier than even the great professionals wanted to do. And I think, in the end, that’s going to be — that will have saved a tremendous number of lives.

Q A quick follow-up. One on the economy and the other on the broader picture here. But just to follow up on my colleague: Some people did note that your tone seemed more somber yesterday. You talked about that August timeline. Did you see a projection? Some people thought perhaps that 2 million, potentially, that could die maybe prompted part of that. Was there a shift in tone?

THE PRESIDENT: I didn’t think — I mean, I have seen that, where people actually liked it. But I didn’t feel different. I’ve always known this is a — this is a real — this is a pandemic. I’ve felt it was a pandemic long before it was called a pandemic. All you had to do is look at other countries. I think now it’s in almost 120 countries all over the world.

No, I’ve always viewed it as very serious. There was no difference yesterday from days before. I feel the tone is similar, but some people said it wasn’t.

Q Can I ask one on the economy? Your former economic adviser said almost 100 percent chance of a recession. Do you see it that way?

THE PRESIDENT: It could be. I mean, I don’t think in terms of recession. I think in terms of getting it out, because when we’re finished with the virus, we will win. We will win.

And when that victory takes place, our economy is going to go through the roof. It is so pent up. It is so built up. It is so ready to go in an upward direction. But we have to knock out this enemy. This is a really tough enemy, but we have to knock out — all of us. That’s all of us.

So I don’t think in terms of recession. Not recession. It’s words. We have to knock out this, and we will have an economy — I actually think we’ll have an economy like we’ve never had before. It’s all pent up.

Did you have something to say, Mike? Please.

THE VICE PRESIDENT: So, I think the question about the actions that the President has authorized, beginning in January, when he took the unprecedented step of suspending all travel from China; the efforts to issue travel advisories for portions of Italy and South Korea and then to begin screening all the passengers; the efforts regarding suspending travel for Europe; and what went into effect at midnight last night, adding the UK and Ireland to that — have all been informed by the experts that are surrounding us.

What the President has asked us to do from the very beginning, as Dr. Birx and Dr. Fauci often say, is let’s follow the data, bring the President the best options in response to what is actually happening on the ground.

But with regard to yesterday’s 15-day slow-the-spread plan, our team unanimously brought to the President these very strong recommendations for every American, because we truly believe we are at a point in this epidemic in our country when we can reduce the number of people that actually are exposed to or contract the coronavirus.

But we’ll continue to bring the best data, the best evidence, and the best recommendations, frankly, of the best health experts in the world. And the President will continue to make decisions that put the health of America first.

THE PRESIDENT: In other words, reduce the number of people that die. That’s what we’re trying to do. And when you do the steep curve, a lot of people are going to die. A lot of people.

You know, the worst ever, they say: 1918. And I don’t have to go into the numbers, but they were unbelievable numbers. Had they known and had they done what we had now, it would have been a very much different story. It would still be tragic, but it would have been a very much different. But that was — that was the one that people write about. That was an incredible — that was an incredible pandemic like we haven’t seen.

But we have — we have done something that I hope — hopefully, we will all have made the right moves. We’re all in this together, including you, and we want to see fair press. And I tell you what: It’s been — generally speaking, I think it’s been — it’s been a great thing to see.

It’s been very, very — the — getting along with Democrats, getting along with Republicans, for the Democrats themselves — there’s been a lot of spirit. There’s been a lot of things happening that I haven’t seen happen in the first almost now three and a half years. It’s been very nice to see. That’s one of the good things.

But, really, the good thing is we have to knock it out. We have to win. And we want to keep that slope as low as possible because that’s a lot of lives in there.

Let’s go back there. Somebody that didn’t get one. Please, go ahead.

Q Mr. President, this has had a huge impact on China’s economy as well. Have you received any indication from officials there that they’re going to have trouble meeting the purchase agreements — part of the phase one deal — particularly the agricultural buy?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, they need our product very badly and — no, I haven’t received any. We have a good relationship with China. I have not received anything to that. No, we have a signed agreement. They’re going to be buying and they have been buying a lot of product.

Yeah, please.

Q Earlier today, Dr. Birx was talking about the possibility of our hospital system being overburdened and overtaxed, and she talked about certain options that are available to the United States if that happens, including VA hospitals —


Q — Department of Defense medical treatment facilities, and even hospital ships. At what point do you tap into those options?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I’ll know the point. And by speaking with Governor Cuomo and other governors, we’re going to know the point. It’s going to be different for New York than it’s going to be for, you know, Iowa or from Idaho or from West Virginia, frankly, or for — you know, it’s different. New York has got a big problem. The State of Washington has a big problem. California has some big problems.

Everyone is doing a good job. But we’re going to know when it will be, and I believe it’ll be more spot than it will be — it’s not going to be the whole thing; it’s going to be spots. There are some hotspots that are in trouble — big trouble. And there are other areas that are in no trouble at all. They watch it on television. They don’t know — you know, it’s just not affecting them and that’s — they’re lucky. They’re lucky. But there are areas of the country that don’t have much of a problem and some that don’t have any problem. They’re not going to have a problem with hospitals.

But some areas — like New York, California, State of Washington — they’re going to have some difficulty. And when we see that coming, we’re going to be in there. We’re already making preparation for it.

Q Senator Marco Rubio of Florida and your trade advisor Peter Navarro have been recommending an executive order that would ensure that the raw materials for pharmaceuticals and medical devices are manufactured here in the United States. We were getting some indications last week that you were close to signing this executive order. Can you tell us where you are on that?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, we’re looking at different things, John. I don’t want to say exactly. Right now, China has been sending us everything we need. But we are — we’re looking at some alternatives. Yes, we are looking for alternatives.

And we have other places. Ireland does a lot of work for us — you know that — in that world, in the pharma world. A very tremendous producer. And we are looking to bring a lot more back home.

And I’ve been — excuse me, you know me for a long time; I’ve been talking about this for many years. Long before I decided to run for President, I’ve been talking about this. And we have to be able to take care of our country. And that was one of the many things on the list. So we’ll be talking about it.

But we are — we are discussing it, and Marco is very much involved and Peter is very much involved. A lot of people are involved, and a lot of people feel that way. But we’ll be discussing.

Let’s go. Please.

Q Thank you, sir. Canada has closed its borders to non-citizens. Are you considering —

THE PRESIDENT: Not to the United States.

Q Not to the United States, of course. Are you considering closing the land borders in the United States? And also, you’ve discussed —

THE PRESIDENT: Well, Canada has not closed it to the United States.

Q Right.

THE PRESIDENT: So we’re working very closely with Canada and — but they have not closed it. They have closed it to the world, but they have not closed it to the United States.

Q Are you considering closing the U.S. land borders?

THE PRESIDENT: I don’t want to say that, but we are discussing things with Canada, and we’re discussing things with Mexico, quite honestly. And, again, the relationship is outstanding with both. Outstanding. We just signed our deal — the USMCA — and the relationship is very strong.

Go ahead, please.

Q China and other have others have criticized you for using the phrase “Chinese virus.” How do you feel about that? Are you going to continue using that phrase?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, China was putting out information, which was false, that our military gave this to them. That was false. And rather than having an argument, I said I have to call it where it came from; it did come from China. So I think it’s a very accurate term. But, no, I didn’t appreciate the fact that China was saying that our military gave it to them. Our military did not give — give it to anybody.

Q But the critics say using that phrase creates a stigma.

THE PRESIDENT: No, I don’t think so. No, I think saying that our military gave it to them creates a stigma.

Q Mr. President, when you speak to —


Q When you speak to travel and tourism executives today, what specific help are you going to offer to them, if at all? Or is it still vague?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, we’re going to help. They need help. Look, let’s face it. You know, they go from having record-breaking years — this is the third year of record-breaking years — travel and tourism, airlines, everything. They were doing record numbers, ordering new planes, building new hotels. Everything was really hunky-dory.

And then, one day, we hear about this rumor in China. And then, we find out it’s much more than a rumor. And then, all of a sudden, we make a great decision to close it up early. It would be a whole different world. It would be a whole different world. But we make a decision to close it up to China, and all of a sudden, tourism and — and then we close it up to Europe, which, you know, people never heard of this before. I’m not sure that that’s ever been done. I know that when I made the decision to close it to China, people told me that’s never been done before, but it was a great decision.

We make good decisions. So, I’ll tell you my best decision: The people behind me are total pros. All over the world, they’re respected — Dr. Birx; Anthony, who has become a — where is Anthony? — become a major television star for — for all the right reasons. No, he’s just so professional. So good.

The people that we have working here have been incredible. And they’re totally respected. The Admiral has been incredible, having to do with the testing. Incredible. And he’s viewing this as testing also for the future. We’re building a platform.

When we took over this platform, the first thing the Admiral said was, “This was not designed for what we’re talking about — millions of people.” It wasn’t. And it’s nobody’s fault. It’s not like — who could have ever predicted a thing like this? But we broke it down and it’s really going to be an incredible system. And it is now a great system.

I just — I just want to say, these are people standing behind me. They’re the most respected in the world. Every country that you’ve mentioned today so far has called them, and they call them all of the time for advice. There is nobody better than what we have.

Q Mr. President, why haven’t we seen Dr. Redfield in the last couple of days?


Q Why haven’t we seen Dr. Redfield in the last couple of days?


THE PRESIDENT: I don’t know. I can’t imagine —

SECRETARY AZAR: He’s in Atlanta, running the CDC.

THE PRESIDENT: I can tell you he’s doing a good job. We’re very happy with him.

Please. You haven’t. Go ahead.

Q Mr. President, yesterday we were being told that the payroll tax was going to comprise the lion’s share of fiscal stimulus.


Q We also had the markets fall quite dramatically yesterday and — were you — did that inform your —

THE PRESIDENT: It wasn’t about the payroll tax.
Q Did that inform your decision? What — what made you make that change? And when did you make that change?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I didn’t make a change. We’re looking at payroll tax. And we’re looking at various other forms of getting money to people. And the payroll tax is something that I’ve always liked. The problem is it does take a period of time — you know, months — before they really see something. And we don’t really have months, in terms of people living. You know, a lot of these — you have people that work on tips. You have people in our — it’s a large number of people. It’s a tremendous — who would think this, right? And they do nicely. They work very hard, but they work on tips.

We have to take care of our people. We don’t want to have people suffering during this period. It wasn’t their fault that this thing, all of a sudden, was upon us. So we’re looking at various — we’re also looking at payroll tax. You know, it’s possible. It’s also possible we’ll do a percentage of payroll tax and then other things. But we’d like to be able to get money to people.

You know, we’re very lucky our country is doing so well, we can do this and we can do it easily. But we have to do it. And I have to say, Mitch McConnell — if you look at Mitch and Kevin and the whole group, it’s been — it’s been incredible how they’re reacting, how Congress is reacting, how — whether it’s the House or Senate, how they’re moving. And I’m talking about Democrats and Republicans.

But we’ve had tremendous leadership meetings, and they want to see it done right and they do want to go big. I think going big is important. I don’t think we want to go up there every day with a different idea, a different concept. “Oh, gee, let’s worry about the airlines. Let’s do this one.” You have a big problem with the cruise ship industry. It’s an industry that was setting all sorts of records two months ago. And then, all of a sudden, there is nobody on the ships. Okay?

So we have to help these. These are great industries. These are going to be taking care of people and passengers and — and for years to come. And paying tremendous taxes — tremendous taxes for years to come. So, we have to make sure this is done.

Yes, Jon.

Q Mr. President, I want to bring up what you referred to just a short while ago about politics. In your address to the nation, you said we have to put politics aside, stop the partisanship, and unify together. But this morning, you criticized the Democratic Governor of Michigan. Yesterday, it was the Democratic Governor of New York. You’ve attacked Obama. You’ve talked — you attacked Biden. In fact, every day except one since that address, you’ve lashed out at a Democratic leader. Are you going to set the example on this?

THE PRESIDENT: I only do that when I have to respond. I watched her on television. She said something that was false and therefore I did do that. And I will continue to do that if they’re not going to play fair. Because, you know, they have the media on their side; I don’t. I just have me.

And if they’re not going to play fair, I’m going to do that. If they are going to play fair, there’s going to be nobody —

Q Obama never criticized you, sir. (Inaudible.)

THE PRESIDENT: There’s going to be nobody better than Donald Trump, in terms of bipartisanship. But if they’re going to say things that are false, like the story that was written yesterday. A lot of people — I don’t know — somebody — I think I know who — but they taped the conference call that I had with the governors. It was a good call. It was fine. I assumed somebody is going to tape it. They handed it to various people, and one of them was the New York Times and the New York Times chose to write totally inaccurately about it. It was a disgraceful thing. It was bad journalism, but, you know, they do a lot of bad journalism. But we respond to that and, actually, people get it. People get it.

No, I want it to be bipartisan and nobody’s going to be better than me. But when they attack me or the people — these incredible people behind me — I’m not going to let them get away with that. I can’t do that.

Okay, how about one or two more questions? Go ahead, please. Please.

Q To follow up on that, (inaudible) was the next natural step. So is the next natural step after that a national lockdown, similar to what San Francisco is doing?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, you can do a national lockdown. Hopefully, we are not going to need that. We think of everything. I mean, we have — every idea that you mentioned, we’ve thought of. And, you know, that’s a very big step. That’s a step that, I mean, in one sense would work. It’s a very big step. It’s something we talk about, but we haven’t decided to do that.

Please, go ahead.

Q Mr. President, what would be the determining factors for you to take that action?

THE PRESIDENT: It would have to get to a level — I just don’t think it’s going to be an action that we’re going to take. I don’t think I’ll talk — but Anthony, all of the people standing behind, we’d get together in a room, plus some additionals, and we would make a decision. But I don’t think that’s a step that we’re going to be taking.

But one more question. You didn’t have one, did you? Come on.

Q Will the U.S. government provide financial assistance to Boeing and airplane suppliers like GE?

THE PRESIDENT: We’re looking at that. We’re certainly looking at Boeing. Boeing got hit hard in many different ways. Boeing never had a problem. For — for years, they were — they were an incredible — an incre- — they were — it was unthinkable what happened, with respect to Boeing. Unthinkable. Probably, I would consider it the greatest company in the world prior to a year ago. Now they get hit in 15 different ways and they have different management. I’ve met the new people running Boeing. I think it’s going to be outstanding.

But, yeah, we have to protect Boeing. We have to absolutely help — help Boeing. They were doing a job. They were getting — it was coming along well. And then all of a sudden, this hits. So, obviously, when the airlines aren’t doing well, Boeing is not going to be doing well. So we’ll be helping Boeing. Yeah.

Q Could you just respond to something, Mr. President, before you leave, on what Jon was saying? You’ve — you’ve called for people to leave politics out of this. Joe Biden said, “The World Health Organization offered testing kits that they had available to the United States and to give it to us now. We refused it. We didn’t want to buy them.” PolitiFact says the WHO never made that offer. Can you tell us what actually happened?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, that’s what I heard. And I’m going to let — I’m going to let Tony answer that question. Or some- — whoever is best at answering that. But I do have to say, when you talk about politics — I watched the debate. Not too exciting. But what they said about me — and we’ve done a great job. When you talk about not — not being bipartisan — what they said about me.

And if you look at swine flu — the whole thing in, I guess it was 2009, and what they did and the mistakes they’ve made, they were terrible. They were horrific mistakes. Seventeen thousand people died. And I’ll be honest, they shouldn’t be criticizing because we’ve done a fantastic job.

The only thing we haven’t done well is to get good press. We’ve done a fantastic job, but it hasn’t been appreciated. Even the — the closing down of the borders, which had never been done — and not only did we close them, but we closed them early — the press doesn’t like writing about it.

So we’ve done a poor job on press relationships and, you know, I guess, I don’t know who to blame for that. I don’t know, maybe I can blame — maybe I can blame ourselves for that. I will blame ourselves. But I think we’ve done a great job. I think we’ve done a poor job, in terms of press relationship.

But let me have somebody answer your question.

DR. BIRX: Yeah, so I tried to cover this in the answer when I talked about quality of kits. And our quality analysis runs through the FDA. So all of these platforms, we have asked people to submit. And we’ve asked states to quality control. So, I mean, the — anybody could submit their test to us. We don’t buy tests that haven’t been quality controlled and they show us the data. Either show us the data upfront or show us the data after they’ve been running them.

Because quality testing for our American people is paramount to us. It doesn’t help to put out a test where 50 percent or 47 percent are false positives. Imagine what that would mean to the American people. Imagine their level of concern now in telling people that they’re false positive.

We take the same approach to HIV. Imagine telling someone they were positive to HIV and they weren’t. So that is our bottom line: the customer, the American people first. And so any of these groups can submit their testing kits through our regulatory processes, but without that and without a plan, we are not going to accept tests that have not been studied by us.

THE PRESIDENT: Good answer. That’s a good answer. Would you have something on that?

ADMIRAL GIROIR: I’m just going to emphasize a little bit more on that. When I became involved in the testing world, I called as senior officials at the WHO as I could find to understand what the situation was. And as far as I can tell from sources that should know, no one ever offered a test that we refused.

THE PRESIDENT: That’s what I heard too.

ADMIRAL GIROIR: This was a — this is a research-grade test, right? Research-grade test that was never submit- —

SECRETARY AZAR: It was not approved.

ADMIRAL GIROIR: Not approved, not submitted to the FDA, that was supplied in tens of thousands of quantities to 100 countries in the world, okay?

So I think there’s a lot that people are saying about this that’s just based on rumor and myth. Nothing was offered that we refused. It was a research test that was not approved. And again, there was a small number that we have greatly surpassed in a very short period of time.

THE PRESIDENT: So, number one, nothing was offered. Number two, it was a bad test. Otherwise, it was wonderful.

Listen, thank you very much.

Q So Joe Biden was incorrect?

THE PRESIDENT: No he made a mistake. I assume — I assume that he’ll apologize. He made a mistake.

Thank you all very much. Thank you. We’ll be back. Thank you.

THE VICE PRESIDENT: Thank you all.

END 1:03 P.M. EDT

This entry was posted in Bailouts, Big Government, CDC, Coronavirus, Donald Trump, Economy, media bias, President Trump, Uncategorized, US dept of agriculture, US Treasury, USA. Bookmark the permalink.

349 Responses to President Trump White House Coronavirus Task Force Briefing – Video and Transcript

  1. bcsurvivor2 says:

    Orlando Florida here, well I live in the burbs, Bars and restaurants are now closed, but you can still buy booze at the liquor stores, yay! Just received a notice that the libraries are closed.Sheesh what’s next?
    My son lives in Northern Colorado and works for the city parks dept. they are on a level 3 emergency alert, if they get to level 4 he stays home with pay.


  2. clodfobble says:

    What is truly frightening is that the criminal cartels that control congress and puppets that inhabit that institution are going to try to “do something”. The damage and harm inflicted on the American people by government is FAR worse than any flu bug.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Bendix says:

    Last I heard, Cuomo and de Blasio are arguing over who gets to order New Yorkers to stay in their homes.
    I am so sick of this.

    Liked by 1 person

    • cjzak says:

      Cuomo just said he has no plans to quarantine any cities in the state. FWIW.


      • California Joe says:

        Cuomo knows it’s a hoax and isn’t going to destroy the economy of New York to placate the news media which he well knows will never be satisfied!


        • cjzak says:

          You give little Andy too much credit. He’s just looking for a way to seem like a hero. But it’s actually a good thing he’s not totally coming down on the cities. Yet.


    • LoonsCall says:

      sorry to jump in your comments.. but just can’t shake this (not to mention that Karen Pence received an ‘envelope’ at gwb funeral).. Mike is way too something.. you never see an emotion in his eyes, vacant.. all too contrived.. wouldn’t trust him as far as i could throw him


      • TRUTH says:

        Mr. “Lode Stone” Mike Pence is “Anonymous”. I won’t be surprised if something “happens” to Trump and Pence “moves in place”.


  4. WIVoter says:

    In Wisconsin the evil Tony Evers has listened to the biggest fear monger in history, Dr. Fauci, and closed all bars and restaurants. Wrecking peoples lives must be the dream of a lifetime for these tyrants. President Trump must realize the people will not suffer this imprisonment indefinitely for the simple reason that there will be nothing left to lose when your broke and desperate. Hyper inflation isn’t the answer no matter what President Trump thinks or his henchman Mr. Mnuichin.
    Yes, I am angry. I see people scared to death and that HORRID DR.FAUCI wanting to close this country down indefinitely because some people might die. Well, how many have died of flu Dr.Fauci? More people died of the flue than your precious Coronavirus that is nothing but a vehicle for a totalitarian take over of America.
    With this attitude of fear and trembling we would never have sailed on the Mayflower or settle the west or fought the War for Independence against England.


    • California Joe says:

      President Trump put Dr. Fauci on a pedestal, wound up his key and turned him loose on Americans! Remember, in the first week or so Dr. Fauci was the voice of reason even saying that reasonable containment and control measures like frequently washing your hands, maintaining safe distances and staying home if you’re feeling I’ll would work. Even last Friday he said that the Coronavirus would peak in 8 weeks with the arrival of warm weather. Now, Dr. Fauci is the Grim Reaper even going along with Chris Wallace on the hundreds of thousands of Americans dying from the virus! Was his reasonable statements to lure President Trump into trusting him?


      • steph_gray says:

        I did not hear Fauci “going along with” that. One could twist his unfortunate way of speaking to pretend he meant that; but not without twisting.

        Fauci is not the greatest spokesman, I’ll concede that, and that only.

        And President Trump doesn’t put anybody on a pedestal.


  5. Charlotte Powell Brooks says:

    Licking Airplane Toilet Seat Coronavirus Challenge.
    I just saw this on Gateway Pundit.
    And this generation blames the Boomer generation for everything they think is wrong.
    Was this generation natural born or test tube?


  6. Ploni says:

    The New World Dis–Order


  7. Jim in TN says:

    Conservatism combines common sense and doing the right thing. It is not easy putting theoretical underpinnings on either. It also supports individual freedoms, not license, and responsibilities. Things that need people who will do the right thing and follow common sense.

    On the other hand, intellectualism spurns both the moral and the common. No matter how well one can speak or lay out theory, it is hard to be right when one spurns labels of right and wrong, or spurns practices that make sense because they work.

    In some ways, medicine allows us to even avoid the consequences of our actions. Certain behavior spreads disease, other behavior creates unwanted babies, or does both. Medicine allows us to engage in those behaviors by curing the disease and killing the unwanted. It enables the behaviors that common sense and morality would advise against.

    I believe that Trump always does what makes the most sense. Reagan did too. And both have good moral guidance too. In as much as either dealt with a topic they had experience with, or thought a lot about, they were well armed to deal with bad advice.

    But what happens when a subject comes up where that preparation is not so strong? Well, Presidents are in the best and worst possible situation when that happens. Presidents get advice from the ‘best’ experts.

    And for pandemics, these experts are first, government employees, second, medical leaders and third, top intellectuals. Their advice will be government centric, in line with liberal medical theories of the day, and come from a world that spurns common sense and right or wrong.

    President Trump has proven he can overcome bad advice from the likes of Bolton and Obama. But right now, he seems to be trusting his ‘make it up as you go’ experts quite a lot. And we are moving towards doing things that restrict freedom and increase government control. The opposite of conservatism.

    At least we haven’t started welding people into their homes. Maybe we will have bought enough time for these drugs to lesson the severity and speed up the recovery, and we can all go back to normal. But these precedents will still stand and will be used against the people by abusers who say they are doing these things for the people.

    But the worst part is, like all experts, they are myopic. And many things are being done from a very narrow viewpoint, forcing others to clean up the mess they make afterwards rather than coordinating the minimization of bad consequences in advance. Nor do these experts seem to give a rats ass about the massive harm they are inflicting as their cure. A very medical attitude.


  8. sabreman30 says:

    Fauci has no regard for what is happening to the economy. He receives a guaranteed Fed paycheck so screw everyone else.

    Does anyone know anyone with Covid-19? I sure don’t and I don’t know anyone else that does.


    • gda53 says:

      I know my mother is 91, in a home and has a preexisting heart valve condition along with fluid on the lung.

      I figure she has a 50/50 chance to survive this – no better. And that’s if we bend the curve.

      Different perspective I guess.

      This shit is serious. If you think Dr. Fauci is leading the world into a recession to satisfy his ego I suggest you might need to wash your brain for 20 seconds with soap and hot water.

      Liked by 1 person

      • California Joe says:

        Keep your mom home and don’t have many visitors. Wash your hands frequently. She’ll be fine!


      • able says:

        i wish your mom well. your tunnel vision to save your mother is understandable.
        people don’t need to wash their brains, it’s the other way around. we shouldnt destroy our country and 100’s of millions of lives cause it’s a scary situation with your mom.
        dr. fauci is myopic in his viewpoint as well.
        at a certain point we have to have a social contract around what we’re willing to sacrifice for a “pandemic”. And we should be sending a $15,000,000,000,000.00 to the chinese.


  9. Elvis Newton says:

    It is a national emergency. PDJT could activate the EBS system, suspend all internet, cable, radio and tv broadcasting except what comes from White House, Local or State Government, just like they will do if we are attacked by some foreign enemy. Fill the rest of the time with chamber music. Cut out 99% of the fear porn and replace with simple facts. Get some use out of that ebs system that industry has paid $$$ over the years to install.


  10. Ausonius says:

    67 people in Ohio, most in the Cleveland area, have the virus, supposedly*. 67 out of a population of nearly 12 million.

    * I am skeptical that these people specifically have the Wuhan Virus. But…

    Liked by 2 people

  11. CNN_sucks says:

    Makes you wonder celebrities who are diagnosed with coronavirus are probably globalists stooges.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. sabreman30 says:

    By early next week (maybe sooner) if the numbers do not start REALLY increasing there is going be major push back. I keep looking at the JHU Coronavirus map for a major escalation but it’s not happening. There shouldn’t be a lag on deaths. Currently 97 deaths with 50 in the state of Washington! Are there details on the Washington nursing home? I would sure appreciate someone pointing me to this top secret information.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Eric C. says:

      I thought I read somewhere that it’s in the 2-3 week recovery time for a severe case, I wonder if death comes near the end of that time frame, if so expect death numbers to rise. Also, ventilators are needed to make the push through a severe case, maybe our severe patients had quicker access to this type of care as well as our current actions may have delayed the cases to a point where we’ve been able to manage the severe cases rather than triage who gets care and who doesn’t.

      I hope our death toll doesn’t rise much more and the increase in cases decline. The measures would be a success.


      • sabreman30 says:

        Are there age ranges? The Korean’s have a site with such details (location, age range, ect). Most of the deaths are 70+ years. My age range (50-59) has a .37 chance of death. In Korea its taking out people over 70 but overall death totals are not large. You can take a look here.


        • California Joe says:

          You have a 1,000 times greater chance of being killed by a crazed red-light runner speeding through an intersection trying to get toilet paper than dying from the Coronavirus!


    • Co says:

      105 deaths now just reported, wanted to share.


    • Pale rider says:

      The testing is the ruse here. Nobody was tested before so, no virus, or it seemed. But if everyone is tested, more cases will pop up and it will look awful scary.
      This is a joke, people hoarding, panic for what? Because the MSM.


  13. TarsTarkas says:

    I’m seeing WAY too much tinfoil hat stuff on this site and thread right now. Much higher levels than the usual very low levels (mostly by trolls). Believe what you want to believe, but I want some proof before I start to believe too. START to believe. IMO this isn’t a hoax, this isn’t some grand conspiracy to take over the world, this is an Oh F**k situation complicated by Tyrant Xi and his underlings trying to save face and damn the consequences to their own people and the rest of the world.

    The big push by the CCP to relabel the virus and pin its origin on the US is very similar to Russian Navy attempts to blame the Kursk submarine disaster on our Navy some years back. TDS is helping this slander mightily.

    If the thing winds down and there are relatively few fatalities POTUS will be blamed for overreacting, if it turns into a Spanish Flu POTUS will blamed for not stopping it dead. The efforts to halt and cure and find a vaccine for this beast are moving at supersonic speed compared to the usual plodding bureaucratic efforts the CDC and other government organizations are known for.

    There may even be a cure for the complicating symptoms available right now:

    Liked by 2 people

    • sabreman30 says:

      I am with you. I sure they blame President Trump for something regardless of the outcome.


    • cjzak says:

      Reading that, even if it works, the production of it is quite difficult and it cannot be produced in large the quantities that would be needed very quickly. Maybe the company Gilead will be able to figure out faster ways of producing it.


    • Tars, good points. I’m still looking for the crazy statistics. Like, how many Wuhan Flu Americans died today vs. how many Normal Flu Americans died today vs. How many Americans Died today vs. How many Americans were BORN today? Don’t mean to mess up the Media’s talking points!


  14. Olivia Robbins says:

    I’m not as articulate as the posters here today. I watched this very lengthy presser and am proud of the President and Vice President of the United States of America.

    Have a question: Can you see Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine on the podium with all of the health-care professionals? I can’t.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. jengancworld says:

    To help all the people who have lost paychecks due to this quarantine/shutdown plandemic. President Trump should declare all pay checks will be covered with foreign aid money! If the aid money has already been sent to the countries it will will be earmarked for the next go-around! Our people come first! I think President Trump would agree to this!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Magabear says:

      I like it. 👍


    • steph_gray says:

      How about paying any extra with bigger tariffs on China.


    • Daniel M. Camac says:

      jengancworld, Absolutely! America First right, isn’t that what our President says? But oh we have that stinking Uniparty, oops I mean Congress to stifle such things.

      Fine, then it’s time to say F that Phase 1 China agreement and raise the tariffs to 80%!

      Suck on that Xi. You started this shit just like all your other shithole viruses but we will end it and then we’ll end you and your SOB’s that live in our Congressional chambers.

      Unite and Fight!


    • cjzak says:

      Good idea. Bring it home.


    • Daniel M. Camac says:

      At times like this I just spin the ole Victrola and listen to my lady Kate Smith’s rendition of “God Bless America”. It calms me, takes away all the craziness, even the stupidity of some who I pause to label as Americans.

      It also keeps me from going out and erasing all the A-holes that binge buy things that everyone else may need.

      We will get through this and when we do I want the F’ing media and their masters behind them to pay the full price for this full-blown anti-demic!!

      Cold anger left the building!

      Where is Andrew Breitbart when he is needed most?


  16. Liberty Forge says:

    I have watched & listened to this new conference — more than once.

    Before I say anything else — I absolutely LOVE President Trump!

    The news corp. now has “social distancing” — separated by, what — one seat?

    Please listen to the questions from the MSM — and compare it to previous conferences. Just stop & compare. It certainly is not because “we are all in this together”.

    Calm. No shouting. Listen. Listen to them.

    One seat? How can just “one seat” create that much calm? Where are the yapping hyenas?

    The ankle-biting, shouting hyenas are calmed by just one seat? They are Jackals.

    And now the MSM is actually telling people to listen to & trust President Trump???

    My thoughts?

    They (whoever the hell “they” are) have succeeded.


  17. A2 says:

    Great presser. I see Dr Brix addressed the false positive/false negative testing problem. I wonder after explaining it multiple times if the press finally gets it.

    Also good to hear that the networks will do PSAs. Very important to hammer the message to every household.

    I’m also glad the President pointless said, stop denigrating the team. Well done.

    Liked by 3 people

  18. Mike in a Truck says:

    Funny thing…all these politicians and bureaucrats that want to shut down our country. Make people stay at home with no work,no income. All those poobahs still draw a check from the treasuries backed up by the American taxpayers. How bout they stop taking a check until this blows over? Wouldn’t that be fair and patriotic? Why should they be exempt from the pain?

    Liked by 1 person

    • sabreman30 says:

      Yes I said the same regarding Fauci. Money should come from every Fed Employee’s paycheck.


    • Magabear says:

      Did any of these politicians consider that there are many people living in households who for various reasons hate their current living arrangement and are now being told to be there 24/7? The indifference shown towards people by these decision makers, whether it’s costing people their livelihood or putting them in a difficult living situation, is awful.

      So now every night when I leave work the roads look like a Sunday at the same time. But we must put ourselves into recession due to the high body count of the wuhan flu. 🙄😠


    • Lady in Red says:

      Let’s start with Piglosi. For as long as people are negatively impacted in that cesspool of San Francisco. How about they donate a month or two or more of their salaries to Coronavirus research. POTUS should bring this up in a tweet 😂


  19. milktrader says:

    Info graphic from John Hopkins arcgis app is unfortunate…

    It looks like the whole country is infected but the data says 6,421 cases from a population of 330,000,000.

    Does anyone do math anymore?


  20. MaineCoon says:

    Italy has rushed 10,000 medical students into service. Heartbreaking for Italy.

    Italy will rush 10,000 student doctors into service, scrapping their final exams, in an effort to help the struggling health service cope with the #coronavirus outbreak (1/4)— Reuters (@Reuters) March 17, 2020


    • California Joe says:

      It’s what happens when you sell your leather industry to China and import 100,000 Chinese workers from Wuhan!

      Liked by 2 people

    • Jase says:

      Interesting. Not sure this is relevant to tha Italian decision, but I read an interview with a Romanian doctor working in Germany, who said the biggest problem the Germans face is a lack of health professionals.
      According to him, over the past few years the Government has been cutting funding from its health system because of the huge costs associated with the millions of immigrants Merkel allowed in.
      They have fantastic equipment, just not enough doctors and nurses to use it.

      Liked by 2 people

    • theasdgamer says:

      Italy is likely ventilator-deficient and is using ambu bags manned by medical students and retired health professionals.

      Liked by 1 person

  21. milktrader says:

    When NYT editorial members miscalculated Bloomberg expenses as a ratio to the population on an order of one million, what makes you think frontline reporters will get it right?

    Adding to this misinformation is the John Hopkins arcgis app that makes it appear as though the entire country of 330,000,000 is infected when their own data says only 6,500 are infected.

    Who does math anymore? I feel alone.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Daniel M. Camac says:

      milktrader, Fear not! Now there’s two of us!

      Liked by 1 person

      • nimrodman says:

        In the interests of “math”:

        Call in Jethro Bodine to do his cipherin’

        His “timeses” and “gazintas”

        “Aught times one is aught
        “Aught times 2 is aught
        “Aught times 3 is aught …”

        “One gazinta one, once
        “One gazinta two, twice
        “One gazinta three, three times …”


  22. MfM says:

    It’s interesting how there is so much talk of slowing things down… but there has been zero talk of how many ventilators are in use. No talk about how many ventilators per 100,000 people. I’m not hearing of people’s elective surgery being cancelled.

    I know Italy has an aging population, but I’ve seen no in depth discussion of how the Wuhan Flu got such a foothold so fast. Could it be that it wasn’t just a couple of people coming in from china,, but a bunch on different planes over several days?


  23. MVW says:

    Anecdotal report:
    In Florida, Mom (89) was taken for a respiratory infection tonight for chest x-ray and blood work at a Haines City Hospital. She was also given a Corona virus test, so they were able to do the test. Test results will of course come later but X-ray and blood work were good. A prescription for antibiotics and stronger cough medicine were given.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. bruzedorange says:

    I’m fascinated by this statement by PDJT (or maybe I’m just ignorant not to understand what it means):

    “I think China has every incentive to make sure that things work well. China wants to make sure that things work very well. They have every incentive to do so.”

    What is this incentive for China to make sure things work very well? Or is this just Negotiator-in-Chief Trump speaking through his Panda mask?

    Liked by 1 person

  25. theasdgamer says:

    Media Focus fallacy: Whatever new thing the media focuses on is important…e.g., coronavirus.

    Why do we care about tests? Not for treatment–it’s only for the CDC statistics. Doctors treat the symptoms if someone presents coronavirus symptoms.

    Coronavirus is a big yawner…Coronavirus Derangement Syndrome is a big problem.


  26. Mark says:

    Data manipulation??? Look at this published from CSSE(Center for Systems Science and Engineering):(U.S.) 6362 cases; 108 dead, 17 recovered, what about the rest?????
    I fear not the disease, I fear the harm that the fear mongers are bestowing on our country. Sorry, but I am doing my day-to-day as I have been for years, even throughout prior endemic/pandemic outbreaks, hurricanes, whatever. Is it me that thinks we are being driven into panic?


  27. WIVoter says:

    If there is an earthquake in San Francisco can the citizens leave their homes or won’t Dr. Fauci allow it.


  28. John says:

    Could the Wuhan Coronavirus have been triggered by the massive rollout of 5G in Wuhan and other near by cities? Approximately 150,000 5G towers have been installed by the end of 2019.
    Wireless radiation from 1G to 5G have all emmitted modulated “Radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic (EMF) and there are literally thousands of studies showing biological effects from exposure to man-made electromagnetic waves, and out of these, hundreds showing biological effects on the immune system.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s