Day Eleven – Senate Impeachment Trial, Closing Arguments and Senate Debate – 11:00am Livestream…

There will be 24 hours of presentation by House Impeachment Managers (over 3 days); 24 hours of presentation by Defense team (over 3 days); 16 hours of Senate questioning; 4 hours of closing arguments, equally divided; open Senate deliberations/speeches; and a final vote on the articles of impeachment.

  • Monday: 11:00am closing arguments by House Managers and Defense (two hours each for a total of four hours); then the senate, regular session, floor speeches begin.
  • Tuesday: 11:00am full day of floor speeches.  Each Senator limited to ten minutes.
  • Wednesday: 4:00pm – A final vote on the articles of impeachment.

Fox News Livestream – CSPAN Livestream LinkAlternate Livestream 1




This entry was posted in 4th Amendment, 6th Amendment, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Donald Trump, Election 2020, Impeachment, Legislation, Live Streaming, media bias, Mitch McConnell, President Trump, Typical Prog Behavior, Ukraine, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

503 Responses to Day Eleven – Senate Impeachment Trial, Closing Arguments and Senate Debate – 11:00am Livestream…

  1. Dances with Wolverines says:

    These next few days, ending with the vote of the Senate to acquit, will let us see into the hearts of each and every elected Senator as to their loyalty to the Constitution and the oath they swore before us all to uphold and abide by the laws they themselves help to create. God help us.


    • I don’t want to see them acquit. I want to see them dismiss, for unconstitutionality.

      These are the first Articles in the history of our republic which do not meet the requirements set forth in Article 1. The Senate has every power to reject them and to declare them to be “null and void.”


  2. EnoughIsEnough says:

    How in the world can President Trump’s potential opponents be sitting in judgement of him during this disgraceful continuation of the coup to remove him? There is absolutely nothing about this entire case that would fly in a regular courtroom, and American citizens should not have to settle for this mockery of our judicial process.

    Liked by 5 people

    • Publius2016 says:

      Its in the US Comstitution…Senate sits in judgement…it was really the 17th Amendment that has perverted Senate power!

      Liked by 2 people

      • EnoughIsEnough says:

        I cannot believe they are not required to recuse themselves.

        Liked by 4 people

      • jx says:

        “no person shall be convicted without the concurrence of two thirds of the members present”

        Senators Michael Bennet, Amy Klobuchar, Bernie Sanders, and Elizabeth Warren are all vying for the Democrat nomination, they should not be allowed to vote for the impeachment of their political opponent. There is no requirement that they be so allowed. If they lack the integrity to recuse themselves then McConnell should block their vote. Of course, he won’t.

        Liked by 4 people

        • Mr e-man says:

          If it were me, I would be there to hear it but vote present. Yes, I know that changes the math but I should not be voting to remove my political opponent.

          If they do, Trump should use it on the campaign trail. They convict Trump for something they are doing themselves? Oh they are required to ? Just like Trump is required to investigate corruption.

          Liked by 1 person

    • fhb says:

      1.dan bonino seems to forgotten his police detecting skills….who approached whom in regards to money corruption. the thief does not go to the investigators unless he know that the investigator is corrupt, and in the Ukraine case , the corrupt USA people went to them. In order to help steal foreign aid monies {State Dept. that why hrc and them wanted that post. a. they knew the racket from their previous time in the White House and were setting up such a “thing”. 2. yes dan is starting to “feel” his way closer to the whole wickedness with bits and pieces concerning the bidens, clintons and others.


  3. WSB says:

    Where’s Jerry?

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Reserved55 says:

    Schizophrenic Schiffty

    Liked by 7 people

  5. Maquis says:

    The banality of Schitt, can’t even get my BP up over his delirious fabulations.


  6. waterthelibertytree01 says:

    Listen to this blithering idiot Heinrich, wow just slanding the president in his hall PC. Disgusting.


  7. John says:

    P/T Impeachment legal defense team used policies and procedures (1-weapon) to help destroy the impeachment.

    Not following policies and procedures is a very power weapon to discover the truth in a defense or prosecution.

    .Following Investigative/prosecutorial policies and procedures is a very powerful weapon to use to discover the truth in a defense/prosecution and to easily prove intent etc…

    Not following policies and procedures by the house clearly exonerates P/T. Destroyed the Prosecution.

    The FBI/DOJ allegedly not following policies and procedures (Hillary Email, Fisa etc. etc.) in allegedly framing P/T of criminal acts that they allegedly did, is a very powerful weapon for finding the truth and prosecuting the coup.

    Finding and proving if normal investigative/prosecutorial policies and procedures were used, can clearly and easily reveal the truth; since there are mountains of clear identifiable paper/digital trails of evidence everywhere of lead sheet work papers.

    Coup/Criminals are extremely worried today and have been since Nov 2016.

    Liked by 2 people

  8. Hans says:


    Liked by 5 people

  9. fanbeav says:

    Even the prayer is political! This is really disgusting!

    Liked by 2 people

  10. waterthelibertytree01 says:

    he’s now projecting that the President is obstructing the election……… and thick.

    Liked by 1 person

  11. Maquis says:

    Schitt: A fatally partisan impeachment proves that those who reject it are fatally partisan.
    Um, no…

    Liked by 1 person

  12. andy says:

    SCHIFF “Today we urge you in the face of overwhelming evidence of the president’s guilt and knowing that if left in office he will continue to seek foreign interference in the next election, to vote to convict on both Articles of Impeachment and to remove from office Donald J. Trump…”

    We need witnesses because there is “overwhelming evidence of the president’s guilt”.

    But here is the icing on the cake…. If there is such overwhelming evidence that Trump is abusing his power through secret quid pro quo arrangments, then why did congress so readily pass and praise the USMCA and Phase 1 china agreements without flinching?

    More ‘pretending not to know’ things in order to maintain a position.

    Liked by 3 people

  13. waterthelibertytree01 says:

    Grassley just asked that Schiff be removed from office over the sham impeachment and other former acts around Mueller, etc.

    Liked by 15 people

  14. Maquis says:

    “Apocalypse in Washington”


    • Paprika says:

      Wait, I thought Shiffty said it was “Midnight in Washington” following his golden orb and pendulum mixed metaphor drama script. (smiles)

      But, lets face it, no one can keep up with his hyperbole and shifting allusion ‘regurgitations’. The only Shiff constants are hubris and hypocrisy.


  15. waterthelibertytree01 says:

    Shem Horne
    Grassley is calling out the House Democrats trying to accuse President Trump of bribery even though it wasn’t in the articles of impeachment. Says impeachment shouldn’t be a moving target.
    Show this thread
    Shem Horne
    Chuck Grassley is speaking and he says that the President’s actions aren’t even impeachable let alone worthy of removal from office.

    Liked by 5 people

  16. I hope The Senators find Schiff and Company as offensive as I do.

    Liked by 1 person

  17. waterthelibertytree01 says:

    now the next idiot D comes up to parrot the same lies. No money was withheld, no investigation commenced. Remember this folks…….it’s deflection 24/7

    The President represents their ending in Gov’t and perhaps as free citizens. Therefore they are all in to end him


  18. waterthelibertytree01 says:

    Is Senator Patty Murray (D) Washington, Adam’s schiffs mistress? She’s reading his exact rehearsed words.


  19. litenmaus says:

    Demanded a foreign government to interfere in an election….Patty Murray states that there is evidence. She’s seen it with her own eyes…….

    Liked by 3 people

  20. L4grasshopper says:

    So now the Senators start the bloviating marathon……

    Q: is the trial still in session, and thus preventing the Dem Senators from campaigning?

    Or is the Senate now “in Session”, and Sanders and Warren can race to Iowa for tonite’s festivities?


  21. Eaglemom says:

    I have this feeling that Romeny will choose to speak on the senate floor late tomorrow afternoon (right before the State of the Union) and say that he is voting to remove the President from office. Of course, it doesn’t matter because it takes 67 Senators to remove but it would upend the State of the Union address.


  22. Reserved55 says:

    If I recall, a guy named B J


    • dawg says:

      Why is it so many people cant seem to put together a coherent statement on twitter?

      Why is there a comma in the first question? The second “sentence” isnt even a complete sentence.

      And BJ was only about 20 years ago. This b!tc# literally doesnt have a clue.


    • Chimpy says:

      Omar is too busy seducing a married man to do much else. Oh, wait, apparently he’s now divorced, she’s divorced, and they are dating legitimately. Isn’t adultery punishable by stoning per Sharia law?

      I am trying to figure out how she keeps finding guys to hook up with. I wouldn’t touch that with a ten foot pole.


  23. waterthelibertytree01 says:

    Debbie Stabenow, stabbing us in the eye with more of the same lies!!

    Liked by 1 person

  24. jrapdx says:

    Is there any surprise here? Sen Murray echoes Schiff, what else is new? I expect the same from the other Democrats, utterly predictable, completely boring.

    Would be interesting to hear one say exactly what crime was committed by Pres Trump, but it can’t happen since there was no crime. The only conclusion is that Democrats continually spin fiction, IOW lie to our faces. And enjoy nothing so much as hearing their own voices to the exclusion of any others.


  25. litenmaus says:

    The Dem smear continues under the ruse of “by impeaching Trump we’re stopping future actions imagined by us”

    Liked by 3 people

  26. Nick the Deplorable says:

    If they are going to let all the dems give their 10 minute speeches first. The GOP should give up their time and just vote tomorrow.

    Liked by 2 people

    • jrapdx says:

      I had the same idea. Let the Democrats spew their repetitive bile, all of them who insist on reading the same prior written speech, and Republicans should say nothing.

      But we know full well politicians CAN’T resist the temptation of an open mic, the Republicans will succumb and take every minute of the time available. It’s not unlike gas laws in physics: hot air always expands to the maximum extent.

      So you see, it’s not personal, it’s just the nature of the beast.


  27. waterthelibertytree01 says:

    Now, Plastic Face Ron Wyden Creepiest ever!

    Liked by 1 person

  28. Heika says:

    WTF?? They must be stopped now. This is insane – however gives a very clear glimpse into the dangers of that lunatic Pelosi et al every coming near the levers of power. This is just plain scary.


  29. gsonFIT says:

    The only way dems can rationalize their denial for justice and critical thinking would be an intent to label PDJT as impeached and thereby discounting his ability to appoint SCOTUS nominees They burned the boats on Kavanaugh and have to come up with some ammo to fight a constitutionalist judge. Patently wrong but oh so predictable.

    dems should be denied the legislature!


  30. Mr e-man says:

    The Dems are just repeating the Schiff parody of the fiction they are selling. They never back it up with evidence. They just claim there is evidence while narrating their fictitious story line devoid of facts in evidence.


  31. Nick the Deplorable says:

    What is going on? Place is empty.


  32. dallasdan says:

    Come Wednesday evening and the acquittal has occurred, the hard-core tens of millions who hate the President with a visceral passion will be completely unmoved by the obvious absurdity of these proceedings.

    However, many reasonable independents and moderate Dems alike who are politically aware are very likely to be sympathetic to the President and refuse to vote for whichever DS clown runs against him. JMO

    Liked by 1 person

  33. Kaco says:

    Oh, wow, Manchin has not listened to a word of Trump’s defense and has gone full partisan loony Dem and spitting out lies.


    • convert says:

      I evidently should stop all posting about politics as I evidently understand nothing. I would have bet my paycheck that there was no way Manchin could possibly vote to impeach Trump and survive in the state of WV. No way. But it is looking like I am totally off base. I just don’t get it. Unless he’s planning on just going ahead and retiring and walking away ..


  34. Paprika says:

    Yup, it sure is! In 1.5 hours of being in session we’ve heard from 5 senators, 1 R, 4 D’s. In 90 minutes there could have been 9 senators, but I guess they have lost their eagerness to get this part over with in a orderly fashion!

    So saying each senator has 10 minutes does not even come close to guestimating how long it may actually take to get through this political speechifying marathon. Will the Senate extend the time so each and every of the 100 senators get to have their 10 minutes of ‘political bloviation’ or will time run out at 4pm Wednesday?

    But wait, Senator Manchin is now saying that PT could be censured if not convicted and we should move on together for the good of the country. WTH ???????????


  35. JohninMK says:

    I’m not sure if this has been mentioned before but after that wonderful moment when Nadler upstaged Schiff, did anyone see Nadler sitting again among the House Managers group?

    Check the videos, I might be wrong. He just vanished.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s