Speaker Pelosi: The House Will Vote to Protect Iranian Terror Groups on Thursday…

Speaker of the House “Tehran Nancy” has announced her intention for a vote on Thursday in an effort to limit President Trump’s authority to defend against attacks by Iran, and increase the democrat effort to protect Iran’s ability to target Americans in the region.

“Mullah Bin Schumer and Tehran Nancy”

“Members of Congress have serious, urgent concerns about the Administration’s decision to engage in hostilities against Iran and about its lack of strategy moving forward. Our concerns were not addressed by the President’s insufficient War Powers Act notification and by the Administration’s briefing today,” Pelosi said in a statement.


This entry was posted in Big Stupid Government, Cultural Marxism, Culture, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Iran, Iraq, Islam, Legislation, media bias, Nancy Pelosi, Obamacare, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

271 Responses to Speaker Pelosi: The House Will Vote to Protect Iranian Terror Groups on Thursday…

  1. Elric VIII says:

    The U.S. Constitution states that the President is the Commander in Chief of all of the U.S. Armed Forces. Congress can declare war, but the proposed resolution infringes on the President’s prerogatives in the absence of a declaration of war. Congress can act like they can limit the President’s actions, but they can’t. Even if the House passes it and the Senate follows through it would be unconstitutional. Therefore, the Democrats are setting up another Constitutional crisis of their own making.

    Liked by 27 people

  2. 335blues says:

    Does any sane person nor believe that the marxist democrat party hates America, hates Americans, and is working to destroy us?
    Dan Bongino asks “what side are they on?”
    The clear answer is:
    They are not on America’s side.

    Liked by 19 people

  3. burnett044 says:

    Dems and Neo-cons …rinos and never trumpers…CIA and many other scum will do anything to stop PT from stopping them from sucking on the money teat..
    I put nothing past them false flags etc…
    war is big business…..many will try to keep one going

    Liked by 13 people

    • islandpalmtrees says:

      The pictures above make me think of this. Keep those wars going and they can make more money. And, better if they can find someway of twisting it, in order to blame the war on President Trump.

      Liked by 5 people

  4. listingstarboard says:

    Omar and Tlaib are giddy about American casualties https://twitter.com/i/status/1215009273580834817

    Liked by 1 person

    • Boots says:

      Omar, Tlaib, and the other unholy daughter of satan are filthy pigs who brazenly flaunt their vile hatred of America, and think that because they’re women no one would dare smash their faces with a brick for laughing at American dead; whereas someone might do it if they were men.

      If only they knew how many hundreds of thousands, maybe millions of men – and women! – would gladly use that brick if they could. Until their faces were unrecognizable.

      Liked by 7 people

      • Just wondering aloud here. Is there a sausage or bacon of the month club these “filthy pigs” could be subscribed to? Kind of like donating to Planned Murderhood in the name of the VP.

        Liked by 3 people

      • yucki says:

        In third world hellholes “brown and black” women are victims of acid attacks all the time.
        Is the anti-Americanism of this trashy lot simply naivete?
        Or are they just reading the script given to them by their handlers?

        Liked by 2 people

    • littleanniefannie says:

      And Jayapal looks like the clueless HouseMouse she is too.

      Liked by 5 people

    • decisiontime16 says:

      Import 80,000+ Somalis and Ilan Omar is what we get. They vote for her in their district but the whole country pays the price.

      Liked by 8 people

  5. dimbulbz says:

    Huh, Utards… Time for you to get 2 new Senators who are pro-American instead of two anti-Trump dummies. What possible constitutional solution is it to try to revoke the commander in chief’s ability to be commander in chief?

    Liked by 4 people

  6. Bendix says:

    Go ahead, Nancy.
    There are people serving in the military today, who are not Trump supporters. I would wager that those people, and their friends and families, will nevertheless be joining with the service members, and their friends and families who do support president Trump, when it comes to the issue of Americans being attacked and killed overseas.
    That’s a pretty large swath of America.
    Add that to the fact that nobody likes Nancy already. This isn’t going to help her any.
    How desperate do you have to be?

    Liked by 6 people

  7. woohoowee says:

    Dear Tehran Nan,

    Was the Gang of Eight briefed on drug running by Hezbollah during Othugo’s reign?

    Since you are a public servant and not a dictator, a yes or no answer is required.

    Liked by 9 people

  8. freepetta says:

    I’ve never seen so many traitors on both sides of the aisle.

    Liked by 8 people

  9. Lion2017 says:


    Liked by 4 people

  10. Dutchman says:

    When your enemy tells you WHO they are,….Believe them.

    AmercanThinker article, today;
    “6 ways the Democrats coddled Solemani” as you read the,article, and the additional linked article, it becomes clear “coddled” is more accurately

    It repeats something I have come to question; that the Obama admin was so anxious to make a deal with Iran, that they gave away the store in the negotiations.

    I agree they gave away the store, but doubt the explantion of “WHY?”

    Once is happenstance.
    But THIRD time?
    E N E M Y A C T I O N

    Obama WANTED to give Iran everything, not because Iran would be an effective counter to SA and Israel, and therefore a stabilising influence.

    Obama wanted to destabilise the ME, and knew exactly what the results of his actions would be. It was INTENTIONAL.

    Obummer should be impeached, and prosecuted for “giving material aid to known terrorists.”

    And, much of his,administration, as well.

    So, seperate charges to those involved in the coup, even though many of the same names are involved.

    Liked by 17 people

    • Ray Runge says:

      AND your rationale makes sense to me. Any actions that further destabilize the middle east would provide increased opportunity for military hardware expenditure. The U.S. and other actors in the region would require a continuous supply of government funded hardware.

      The resultant corrupt kickback during the development and acquisition process would then fund the likes of the UniPary and Deep State cabal.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Boots says:

      “Obummer should be impeached, and prosecuted for “giving material aid to known terrorists.”
      He should’ve been Arkancided. Pretty sure Hill and Bill thought about it and had the means to do it.


      • Dutchman says:

        Well, why didn’t they? Its not like Secret Service,was doing such a great job.
        They were drinking and carousing with hookers, etc. Of coarse thats cause the,agents figured even a crazy person wouldn’t want BIDEN as,POTUS, so as long as they kept the,two apart, Obummer was,safe.

        Hence, they could,…relax.

        As for Hillary, if she got in the,agents would probably need to re-train. Instead of jumping in front, they would push her in front.


    • theoldgoat says:

      The real power behind the lazy man acting as President during that time was an Iranian Woman. I never bought the propaganda that they were desperate to create a piece of Obama legacy so they gave Iran everything. It was a deal which made zero sense then. Of course Lurch would go along with it, I question his real intelligence level, always have.
      When a deal is far too one sided, and that side is the side which has poor bargaining power, how does that pass the smell test?

      Liked by 5 people

      • Dutchman says:

        Yes, like the smell test of not one, not two but THREE scandals hit the Obummer admin., any one of which had the potential to prevent reelection, or even justify impeachment.
        And yet the Republicons in Congress, controling the Majority in the,House, investigate to exhonerate all 3; Fast/Furious,…IRS/Tea party, and Benghazi.
        Doesn’t pass the smell test.

        Liked by 8 people

    • Redzone says:

      … consecutive sentences unless death penalty, in which case concurrent sentences would be ok.

      Liked by 2 people

  11. sDee says:

    We declared war on Japan not on Kamakazis. I believe Trump has sent a message that the war on terrorists is over, that we are going after the nations that send them. It is the role of Congress to declare war. But they won’t and now they intend on stopping a President willing to pursue it to its source.

    Jefferson figured out that the Islamist countries would not stop attacking Americans unless he obliterated them. He formed the Marine Corps, who headed straight for the shores of Tripoli.

    Liked by 10 people

  12. woohoowee says:

    Yoohoo whoever cut off my internet,

    You forgot about my phone.

    Liked by 2 people

  13. Mike in a Truck says:

    I would prefer that the Communist Democrats activate the Draft. And no exemptions this time.I witnessed first hand it’s effect in this country. Let’s see if these “progressives” taste for war is all that keen when they get screamed off the bus at oh- dark- thirty in the morning. Geez I wish I could be a D.I. again. “C’mere Snowflake…. get down and knock em out, you’re gonna push Ft. Sill down to the Mexican border”.

    Liked by 7 people

    • I agree…institute the draft again and then maybe you can have the right to vote, drink and smoke at 18.


    • GB Bari says:

      The only way I would favor a draft would be if ALL elected (i.e., Congress Members) and unelected government employees (i.e., the Administrative State), and their children and grandchildren, who are of eligible age, are the absolute FIRST to be drafted into the combat and combat direct support units of the four military departments, as qualified. No deferments, no waivers (except for the most obvious and verifiable disabilities).

      Let’s see those who want the draft are willing to put THEIR blood where their mouth is.

      Liked by 6 people

    • Jeff says:

      Booted many a mile on the red clay roads and ranges of Ft. Sill. Geronimo’s Grave, Mt. Scott, the Strip…. Good times.


  14. burnett044 says:

    PT will do what he has to do when he has to do it….a look back..

    Liked by 6 people

  15. woohoowee says:

    So the questions don’t go to Tehran Nan disproportionately:

    Dear Mullah Bin Buzzard,

    Do you know anything about Hezbollah running drugs while Othugo reigned?

    A yes or a no response is required.

    Liked by 1 person

  16. Rose says:

    So what does she want a briefing before any actions are taken so she can inform her Islamists/Chicom friends ahead of time.

    Liked by 7 people

  17. Bendix says:

    I’m going to go out on a limb here (well it is a treehouse) and suggest that although they may be able to find some Muslims in America who might be angry over President Trump’s actions, they won’t be Iranians.

    Liked by 4 people

  18. jeans2nd says:

    This is good. This is very good.

    Every Congress and Constitutional scholar, right and left, have all agreed since its inception the War Powers Act is unconstitutional.
    Tehran Nancy has just given Pres Trump the chance to argue the War Powers Act’s constitutionality in front of SCOTUS, where it will undoubtedly struck down.

    Is Ol’ Tehran Nance stupid or what?

    Liked by 3 people

  19. justsayin714 says:

    Getting arrested is the ONLY way she can get anyone to take her picture these days. She’s a has-been actress as well as a has-been activist, who failed at both.


  20. sunnyflower5 says:

    VP Pence’s call was refused by Nancy. VP Pence had to then send a note to Nancy……

    Liked by 1 person

  21. Mike “Big Tech shill” Lee and Randian Paul are right there supporting the Dems.

    Liked by 1 person

  22. Mike “Big Tech shill” Lee and Randian Paul are right there supporting the Dems.

    Liked by 3 people

  23. 335blues says:

    Dan Bongino is predicting Iran will be continuing their proxy wars and terrorist attacks.
    I believe he is right. Iran will continue to attack soft targets with terrorist tactics,
    try to blame others, and otherwise hide their culpability.

    Liked by 4 people

    • GB Bari says:

      Yes I heard that too, but that’s truly not a difficult prediction to make, based on Iran’s past performance.

      And of course by now we should all expect PDJT is well aware of Iran’s pattern of behavior and, despite his public wishes that Iranians & their proxies cease their hostilities, he has long had a multi-leveled strategy and plan of action (with contingencies) ready to execute no matter what the terrorists do.

      Liked by 2 people

  24. Ms. Pelosi needs to read the War Powers Act before she shoots herself in the foot – again.

    The President is the Commander-in-Chief and all matters relating to war and defense are primarily under his domain as the Executive Branch. But Congress must appropriate money for war and must declare war … which it has not done since December 8, 1941. Congress cannot tell the President how to pick his targets. She has no authority under existing law to say, for example, “you can’t treat Iran as an enemy.” If Congress wants to enact a new law, it is free to do so.

    Liked by 2 people

    • omyword says:

      Yep they can. And POTUS is free to veto 😎
      Pelosi fancies herself to be commander in crook.

      Liked by 3 people

    • GB Bari says:

      Forget traditional law.

      Frau Nanzi has Herr Ben Wittes whispering in her ear how to “Lawfare” her way back into power, which means use law if it helps her cause, or finagle around the law if it doesn’t, or just boldly proclaim new interpretations of law (because the Media won’t challenge her) to get what she wants.


  25. SD, your choice of pictures always say a million words. These people are corrupt and cover up there actions with treason.

    Liked by 2 people

  26. omyword says:

    Now this is very revealing. So seems POTUS has outted the demotards puppets? Hey Dems, Squaking like your arm was cut off advertizes to the world who you in bed with.

    Thanks for playing 😉

    Liked by 2 people

  27. omyword says:

    Now this is very revealing. So seems POTUS has outted the demotards puppets? Hey Dems, Squaking like your arm was cut off advertizes to the world who you in bed with.

    Thanks for playing 😉

    Liked by 2 people

  28. woohoowee says:

    Caption for SD’s excellent photo:

    “OMG! Trump’s coming, we’re caught!” 😉

    Liked by 1 person

  29. islandpalmtrees says:

    I am still convinced that Schiff, Pelosi, Biden and the rest of the Socialist Democrats are doing this Impeachment,in fear that their corrupt actions will be revealed otherwise. Leading to prosecution and jail time for the Socialist Democrats Leadership.

    We have already seen proof that most, if not all of the Socialist Democrats Leadership are receiving illegal campaign contributions.

    Just Last Week DOJ Indicted 8 for Funneling MILLIONS in Foreign Donations to Adam Schiff and Democrats… But Schiff Has Gall to Accuse Trump of Using Foreign Nation to Cheat?

    We already know, Pelosi and Schiff have been helping to sell arms to the Ukrainian
    by Joe Hoft December 13, 2019

    Liked by 8 people

  30. littleanniefannie says:

    How about we send the Democrats on a CoDel to Iraq for 3 months right after they vote to neuter the President’s ability to protect Americans there? Adolphy Pelosi could always take her House SS force with her to protect the party. Great idea—load them on pallets and deliver them in the middle of the night on an unmarked plane. If it was good enough for Osama Obama it should be good enough for her!
    PS—don’t forget your burkas women!

    Liked by 2 people

  31. islandpalmtrees says:

    How many reveals of corruption are necessary before the DOJ acts to prosecute the Socialist Leadership?

    Liked by 6 people

  32. Retired USMC says:

    Ohhhhh…what will they do if he doesn’t abide their wishes….Impeach him? BAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAHAAAAHAAAA..silly traitors.

    Liked by 1 person

  33. bacillus says:

    I have half a feeling that in a way similar to NK Kim, Iran is being liberated from a hostage-taker. It may have begun and ended with taking Soleimani who I suspect was a CIA [the rogue elements part] operative. This is the main reason why the Dems are going batsh!t crazy condemning Trump and trying to handcuff him.

    Liked by 3 people

  34. MD says:

    President Trump should suspend indefinitely ALL use of military aircraft for any of congress’s travel. Seeing as we are at a heightened state of alert with Iran, all military personnel and resources need to be at the ready and not being used for congressional vacations. That would piss Nancy off and I would love to see them defend their position.

    Liked by 7 people

  35. mr.piddles says:

    “War Powers Act notification”

    I’m no Constitutional expert or fancy History Professor, but this term is the problem, IMO. This is simply not the world we live in. We’re not going to mobilize an army to go invade Iran because of the actions of one Terrorist Mastermind and his Proxy Brigades sprinkled throughout the Middle East and beyond. What’s needed is pinpoint military counter-measures, which is what we had, and which were, apparently, pretty effective. “Declaring War” is both not applicable and not necessary in the context of global Guerrilla Warfare… which is the world we live in. So Mike Lee and the rest need to get with The Program.

    Liked by 4 people

  36. gueppebarre says:

    They need to look into her kid’s dealings in Iran, too, sounds like.

    Liked by 2 people

    • sickconservative says:

      Really how many are of our representatives are profiting either personally or thru family at this point.
      This has to change as we are being sold out for personal profit.

      Liked by 2 people

  37. Johnny says:

    2 words for you Nancy

    Nancy says to Alex Tribeck, (i will take the Not Gonna Happen Category for a 1000.)

    What did President Trump say to the Speaker of House?

    Was it F U


  38. DesertRain says:

    If Tulsi Gabbard has not seen hard evidence used to justify eliminating the general,
    then her claim that the action was “illegal and unconstitutional” is fully without merit.


  39. Dale Epple says:

    She is just so power hungry!
    People MUST contact their representatives and DEMAND SHE
    BE STOPPED. Congress has no right
    try and remove powers given to the
    President by our CONSTITUTION.

    Liked by 1 person

  40. California Joe says:

    Under the Democrats standard operating procedure instituted by Obama Iran is a third world country inhabited by people of color and are therefore afforded special rights which entitles them to kill American soldiers with impunity. I’m not kidding, Folks!


  41. Rynn69 says:

    Someone get a job description to Speaker Pelosi….STAT.


  42. littlequilterkitty says:

    Pondering a question on my little limb: What interconnected business does Mullah Bin Buzzard and Tehran Nancy have with the late General Slime Dog? Anyone thinking the same?


  43. PVCDroid says:

    This is a turning point in my opinion on the tolerance of Americans to put with this nonsense from Democrats. Any independent left will just have to be forgotten. If a voter really likes what the Democrats are doing, there is no hope for them. I predict Trumps popularity rating to hit 55 on Rasmussen shortly.


  44. BitterC says:

    Not sure why everyone’s all up in arms. This resolution means nothing. Purely symbolic. I caught part of this on Fox today and found this:

    Republican leadership aides argued to Fox News that this War Powers Resolution is “toothless,” saying it has “NO chance of becoming law.” They noted how it is a “concurrent” resolution – [a legislative maneuver that is] not submitted to the president and do not have the force of law.
    The Democrats aren’t making law. They’re bathing in symbolism. Considering that there are still many Democrats in the House who voted for the AUMF — the resolution that authorized the Iraq War — the rush by Democrats to line up and vote against going to war with Iran is somewhat comical — especially when it doesn’t mean a damn thing.


    Liked by 1 person

  45. 6x47 says:

    It is sad to realize that half of the country still gets their news from the MSM propagandists and believes everything published in the NYT/WAPO, or broadcast on CNN. They wholly believe the characterization Pelosi offers, that President Trump is an ignorant fool lashing out like a petulant child, desperately in need of adult supervision from Congressional Democrats.

    “Lack of strategy going forward” FFS.


  46. Sadly this article is NOT the Babylon Bee.


  47. hoosiertruthfan says:

    Ah, the left and their love of absolute filth in human form. Well, filth in general given the conditions in liberal cities.
    I’d love to march Pelosi’s bottom in front a few Gold Star families or those at Walter Reed and see if she still lionizes Soleimani. Goodbye and good riddance! Long overdue.
    Maybe, while she’s there, she can explain the left’s reverence for Baghdadi and the “spark of divinity” present in the MS 13 thugs.

    When do we vote? I can only take so much more lunacy spouted by the leaders of the democrat party and presidential wannabe’s.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s