CNN Panel Admits “House Lawyers” Pushing Impeachment Agenda…

It’s not just what was being said, and how it was being said, but it’s also the chyron to accompany the statements that stands out in this brief panel segment about the goals and objectives of the House impeachment agenda.

Notice “lawyers for House dems suggest”, which is the framework for the broadcast.  This is a key point; an absolutely vital point; that we have discussed here at great length but almost no-one is correctly considering.   The Lawfare crowd is controlling the political activity, not the moonbat politicians.  WATCH:

.

There is a legal network behind all of the political activity; the same network which was behind the weaponization of the DOJ and DOJ-NSD.  The same “beach friend” network of corrupt lawyers who initiated and controlled the Mueller investigation.  The same legal network who designed and are carrying out the operational objectives of the various House impeachment committees.  In totality, this is one big legal continuum of corrupt lawyers.

Names like Douglas Letter, Chief House Counsel.  Committee legal contractors like: Barry Berke, Norm Eisen, Daniel Goldman and even former DOJ-NSD head Mary McCord are all in this background “House lawyers” network.

•Lawfare founder Benjamin Witte; •Comey’s lawyer, special FBI employee and leaker of Comey memos, Daniel Richman; •former DOJ-NSD lawyer David Laufman who represents FBI friend Monica McLean; •Andy McCabe’s personal lawyer, Michael Bromwich, who also represented Christine Blasey-Ford; and •former FBI legal counsel James Baker are all part of this ongoing legal network.

Some within the network are still inside government; like former DOJ-NSD lead legal counsel Michael Atkinson who is the current Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG); and current Flynn prosecutor Brandon Van Grack, who was also part of the Mueller team.  These are all massively corrupt and dirty lawyers.

Even Politico noted the legal team of more than “two dozen” lawyers is involved in the House effort to remove President Trump.  All of them have a specific interest in the removal; and some of them like Mary McCord and her former counsel Michael Atkinson, have massive conflicts of interest due to their prior law-breaking activity:

(Via Politico) […] In all, at least two dozen attorneys have come on board to craft both the legal and political arguments that Trump is defying all manner of constitutional norms. A few have become stars in their own right, serving as both lead interrogator and witness during the nationally televised impeachment hearings.

Others have worked behind the scenes, writing legal briefs and trying to convince federal judges that Trump can’t block witnesses or withhold critical evidence. And they’ve been there in private meetings with the party leaders as they wrote the articles of impeachment that that were up for a vote late Thursday in the House Judiciary Committee.

Many are ringers, hired to handle the entirely different kind of workload that comes with impeachment. It’s a task that requires specialized expertise on everything from the constitutional mechanisms for removing a president to arcane legal theories about the balance of power between Congress and the White House that look to be on track to land before the Supreme Court.

They’re pulling long hours alongside veteran full-time Capitol Hill staffers and other newbies plucked from a flood of résumés that poured in after the Democrats won control of the House last November, which offered a rare opportunity for experienced lawyers who wanted to give the Trump presidency a thorough vetting.

“I think people do see that this is a critical time in our history,” said Mary McCord, a former DOJ official who helped oversee the FBI’s probe into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and now is listed as a top outside counsel for the House in key legal fights tied to impeachment. “We see the breakdown of the whole rule of law. We see the breakdown in adherence to the Constitution and also constitutional values.” (read more)

This entry was posted in Cold Anger, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Election 2020, FBI, IG Report Comey, IG Report FISA Abuse, IG Report McCabe, Impeachment, Legislation, media bias, Notorious Liars, Occupy Type Moonbats, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

209 Responses to CNN Panel Admits “House Lawyers” Pushing Impeachment Agenda…

  1. ResistWeMuch says:

    The lawfare clowns should be doxxed and driven to suicide.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. islandpalmtrees says:

    If the whistleblower Eric Ciaramella who started the hole drive for Impeachment committed perjury then how can any Judge, any Judge support any court case, even if it was constructed by the Lawfare Group calling for Impeachment of President Trump? Since, it is based upon tainted evidence.

    If the evidence, is so strong that the Socialist Democrats led by Schiff and Pelosi were willing to vote for Impeachment of President Trump based upon the lies of a faceless whistleblower. Then what need is their for the 6e documents from a court case?

    Because, the answer has never been about what President Trump has done, it has been about what he will do to Schiff, Pelosi and their families. It’s been about the IC lead by the CIA and their virtual endless acts of corruption with these leaders.

    STUNNING: Pelosi Still Won’t Release Transcripts From Secret Schiff Basement Meetings that Exonerate President Trump and Indict Whistleblower of Perjury!
    by Jim Hoft December 27, 2019

    Speaker Nancy Pelosi won’t turn over the articles of impeachment to the US Senate.

    But that’s not all…

    Speaker Pelosi and Adam Schiff still won’t release transcripts from their secret basement hearings that exonerate President Trump and indict the alleged whistleblower of perjury!

    The hidden transcripts also bury evidence that shows the so-called whistleblower Eric Ciaramella committed perjury.

    Rep. Ratcliffe said House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff is burying evidence of the whistleblower’s crimes in the House SCIF.

    A couple weeks ago, Ratcliffe revealed he “asked IG Atkinson about his “investigation” into the contacts between Schiff’s staff and the person who later became the whistleblower. The transcript is classified “secret” so Schiff can prevent you from seeing the answers to my questions.”

    Ratcliffe suggested Monday that the “whistleblower” Eric Ciaramella committed perjury by making false statements in his written forms filed with the ICIG and that Adam Schiff is hiding evidence of Ciaramella’s crimes to protect him from a criminal investigation.

    Liked by 5 people

    • Dutchman says:

      So, now we understand that these people have a very specific, specialised even meaning for the otherwise generic term “F*CK”.
      AS in “first Flynn and then Trump”;
      its a process of what used to be referred to as “kangaroo court”, conceal exculpatory evidence, accuse the victim of things they didn’t do, and or that aren’t even crimes if they did, corrupt their own lawyers, etc.

      This is just TOO similar to what the,Prosecutors did to Flynn, and as exposed by S.Powell.

      Its the SAME M.O., only difference is the target. Roberts is Judge Sullivan, McConnell is the corrupted attorneys Flynn had at first,……and Schiff is Van crack!

      Liked by 1 person

    • LouisianaTeaRose says:

      Lawfare mines and then exploits our laws and constitution, then weaponizes their Frankenstein product.

      Bend it. Twist it. Sell it.

      And here we are, watching a complete and epic fail.

      Liked by 3 people

      • RobInPA says:

        Which ‘party’ is committing the “epic fail”?

        Like

        • LouisianaTeaRose says:

          Cryptic question.

          Did I say “party” ?

          And my simple, lowly comment invokes just one actor, committing an action.

          So, backatcha.

          Like

      • aarmad says:

        Yes, it appears all of these high dollar democrat attorneys are not necessarily getting it done. And we as taxpayers are footing the bill. But I sometimes wonder if the Republicans are in on the whole hoax??????? Because it seems they do little to actually curb the attacks by these attorneys, other than freak out to the fake stream media. Maybe a real investigation by the Senate! graham, burr, anybody??

        Liked by 2 people

        • fightthepols says:

          Burr? You’ve got to be kidding. He has been on the “go after Trump” team via the Senate Intelligence Committee for the last 3 years. He is wholly owned by Virginia Senator Mark Warner and does as he is told.

          Liked by 4 people

        • dbobway says:

          Senator Richard Burr is a dirty lying criminal. and I voted for him.

          The best these ” Best crooked lawyers, our tax money can by” Is the Senate doesn’t get 51 votes in the acquittal vote.

          They aren’t playing games to convict the President,
          It’s a cover to give the Republican snakes a reason vote for impeachment.
          It sounds like they may need 5 scumbags to vote against A duly elected, best President ever, to put the vote under water.
          All this to fuel the media.

          It only takes 1 big name traitor in this treasonous ‘coup’ to get nailed,
          And the rest of the rats will jump ship.

          Liked by 2 people

          • Robert Arvanitis says:

            Who is Brutus? Murkowski now fears Palin challenge. Would Romney go total rogue?
            Who are the other four and how can we pressure them?

            Liked by 2 people

            • dbobway says:

              Great question Robert. I always pictured Brutus as a man of strength and had leadership skills.
              The Republican Senators in play here, have neither trait.
              The Theatrical tragedy of Ceaser’s assassination, is cloudy about who the black hats and white hats were.
              These Senators can’t wear hats. There heads are slimy with scales, neither hat stays on very long.
              Their take in this and who has the goods on them, are all that matters.
              So far President Trump has won ‘every one of these treasonous ventures’, from the left.
              I think we will get 51.

              Liked by 1 person

    • coolmamie says:

      Could the Senate subpoena all House Intelligence Committee Docs relating to Impeachment Inquiry? i.e. Whistleblower, Atkinson, et. al.?

      Like

    • tav144 says:

      I find it ironic that they want grand jury testimonial material on a allegation that was essentially no-billed because there was no crime, but they won’t give up impeachment material that would be analogous to …..grand jury material .

      Liked by 1 person

    • arsumbris says:

      “…how can any Judge, any Judge support any court case…”

      They can, and do, because there just as many corrupt left-leaning judges as there are corrupt left-leaning lawfare lawyers and corrupt cops, corrupt CIA, corrupt Generals, etc.

      Judges start out as lawyers. They get promoted and appointed to higher office by politicians. There’s no such thing as an independent non-partisan judiciary.

      Liked by 1 person

    • As a man thinkth says:

      The real CRIME here is Atkinson changing the whistleblower rules to allow for hearsay testimony…Lawfare basically changed the law requiring first hand sworn testimony of repeated wrongful acts…Without this change there would be no hearings, half baked witnesses or impeachment…

      Liked by 1 person

      • david bruno says:

        My understanding is he didn’t change the LAW, he changed the FORM to allow second-hand information.

        Like

        • As a man thinkth says:

          David…my understanding is “hear say” evidence is not admissible evidence in any legal proceeding…to change the whistleblower form to allow hear say evidence SPECIFICALLY for this case is beyond suspicious. In fact, the hear say accusations could be the main reason this charade was billed as a Congressional inquiry ….because the hear say testimony would not be admissable evidence in authorized Impeachmemt proceedings.

          Like

      • Robert Arvanitis says:

        I regret to note that the federal rules of evidence create exceptions, where hearsay is specifically admissible. https://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-procedure/hearsay-evidence.html
        An honest person would presume these exceptions would be very few, very limited, and absolutely necessary for other reasons. But it doesn’t seem so. There are 30 of them.
        Give a politician a very narrow gap, and the worms will slither through…

        Like

  3. Sherri Young says:

    Liked by 8 people

    • Zorro says:

      Maybe the person or one of the persons that wrote the report IS sitting in the chair.

      Liked by 4 people

    • mr.piddles says:

      “You weren’t elected by anybody.”

      That line was awesome. AWESOME, I tell you!!!

      Liked by 4 people

    • Susan Bolle says:

      Why are lawyers allowed to run Congress? NO ONE except the elected official should be in that Congressional seat…We have a Republic not an Oligarchy composed of individual representatives looking to get rich and lawyers who are obsessed with power. American citizens did not agree to pay for rich lawyers to ride the $$ coat tails of Congressional officials.

      Liked by 2 people

  4. islandpalmtrees says:

    The transcript is classified “secret” so Schiff can prevent you from seeing the answers to my questions.” The IC continues to use the National Security to shield themselves from prosecution. Where is Barr?

    Liked by 1 person

    • James Groome says:

      Why doesn’t RATCLIFF read it aloud on the floor of the house… there would be nothing SCHIFF COULD DO.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Dutchman says:

      “Where is Barr?”
      I have attempted to cogently, logically answer that question, until I am blue in the face.
      If you don’t know the answer, its because you won’t ACCEPT the,answer.
      Sorry, I can’t help you, as there are none so BLIND, as those who will NOT see.

      Like

      • coolmamie says:

        None of us knows yet. Not you. Not me. In time we will.

        Meanwhile, we need to all realize that a lot of damage has been done to our president and our country based on speculation and suspicion.

        Liked by 1 person

  5. islandpalmtrees says:

    Why has the Lawfara Group not been charged with a FARA violation since their funding is coming from communist China? Where is Barr?

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Sherri Young says:

    Rep Matt Gaetz absolutely nailed this in the video clip.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Jederman says:

      I’m assuming these lawfare pr!cks are billing the taxpayer big time for their abuse of the system.

      Sooooo typically Leftist to create a system, grow the system, then abuse it to get back at people they disagree with.

      Liked by 5 people

  7. phillip jeffreys says:

    Time for someone, somewhere to take these Lawfare rectal orifices to the woodshed.

    Liked by 3 people

  8. TwoLaine says:

    Puppets.

    Like

  9. Johnny Dollar says:

    CNN people live in another time and space.

    Pushing lawyers into the public eye as the underlying hero’s of democrats and their impeachment. Completely ignoring how much the public despises lawyers.

    Bring it, you bunch of doofuses.

    Like

  10. hawkins6 says:

    The overwhelming power handed over to these unelected shyster lawyers in fancy linen by the House Democrat shyster politicians seems to indicate that POTUS’s personal lawyer Mayor Guiliani’s admirable efforts in trying to expose the corruption and election interference in the Ukraine wasn’t his best option and that a team of public speaking consiglieres on Trump’s side are long overdue.

    Past crimes are important topics but the present challenges facing the President are far more crucial. The other side never rests or diverts its attentions away from its one primary goal. To depose, destroy or greatly weaken the President and the presidency. The Framers never envisioned how easy it would be for a corrupt House to politically impeach and weaken a POTUS by simply hiring a band of predatory lawyers to lead the way.

    I wrote before that CTH seemed to be the only outlet that was exposing this widespread Lawfare conspiracy or even daring to mention the word “Lawfare.” The powers given to them by the elected House make it all appear legal and proper conduct rather than the danger it is. Even if they step over the legal line, A/G Barr will not do anything about it as Van Grack’s continued prominent role at the DOJ etc indicates. At least Barr mentioned how Soros is undermining the rule of law in the USA by funding state A/G’s even if he won’t do anything about it. A similar statement about Lawfare’s shenanigans and House power grab might help wake up a few more people before Nov. 2020.
    SCOTUS is the last best hope but….

    Like

    • fightthepols says:

      We need to spread this article to anyone and everyone. If you are involved with a republican club, please post this article. Make sure all of your republican friends and Trump-approvers see this article. I do not think most Americans want lawyers undermining their vote and/or running their country. When I handed out Republican voter guides at the polls in 2016, the question I asked many people was- “don’t you want to try voting for a non-politician” for once? That question really made people think.

      Liked by 1 person

  11. CoHoBo says:

    You start cutting away at an apple that has some bruises on it hoping you might salvage some fruit. The deeper you get into the apple, you realize there’s nothing really edible left. You finally cut into the core and find a disgusting worm chewing at it, and it makes you gag.

    That worm is Lawfare.

    Liked by 2 people

  12. Tim says:

    How does these [expletives] keep straight faces when rattling off such crap? Mary McCord: “We see the breakdown of the whole rule of law. We see the breakdown in adherence to the Constitution and also constitutional values.”

    Like

    • ms doodlebug says:

      Of course they see it. They say what they mean and what they are doing. They know gullible Americans will ‘assume’ they’re talking about PDJT when they’re really being honest about themselves. Gruber had a valid point about the ‘stupidity of the American voter”.

      Like

  13. Republicanvet91 says:

    Thanks for this list Sundance. I think it should be added to as more connections are made, like John Sipher. He may not have a law degree, but he is still helping Lawfare by appearing in news reports trying to throw cold water on any CIA investigation.

    It’s underhanded how so many of these people appear in the news, without ever disclosing their connections to the group. They are pushing their agenda, not adding to the news.

    This is similar to the list of so many people being connected to the Atlantic Council, and their funding from Burisma.

    Like

  14. Ben Franklin says:

    Shakespeare was right about lawyers.

    Liked by 2 people

  15. “We see the breakdown of the whole rule of law. We see the breakdown in adherence to the Constitution and also constitutional values.”

    Yes, indeed we do. We see you.

    You seem capable of writing hundreds of pages of legal briefs meant to press your ideas that “the law is a weapon of war” and that “it means whatever you want it to, as long as you get your way.” But, you don’t seem able to read four pages of handwritten vellum.

    The authors of those cherished pages knew everything about you and about your strategies, which in fact are nothing new. They knew all about “attainder.” They’d rebelled against a country where “maladministration” is still on the books as a cause for impeachment. Where you write hundreds of meaningless pages to push your own “novel interpretations,” they wrote single sentences that said far more. Then, they declared them to be the Supreme Law of the Land.

    Liked by 2 people

  16. mr.piddles says:

    Former DOJ-NSD head Mary McCoup says: “We see the breakdown of the whole rule of law. We see the breakdown in adherence to the Constitution and also constitutional values.”

    That effing woman actually said that… can you imagine? Can you imagine the arrogance it takes to be quoted like that? She and her cohorts were at the fulcrum of years upon years of publicly-documented FISA abuse. Her and her cohorts were within the Circle Of Criminal Conspiracy to remove a duly elect President Of The United States Of America. And now she proudly claims that her job is not done (exclamation point). She’s wagging her boney finger at all of us, lecturing from her Ivory Tower, telling all of us “how it’s gonna be”, how we’re all on the wrong side of the Constitution.

    I think Mary McCoup needs to keep her arrogant little Pie Hole shut until the coast is clear. Or maybe it won’t be. Durham needs to give people like Mary McCoup and the rest of them a legal enema. Anything less than Criminal Conspiracy will be a defeat for the American People and for the U.S. Constitution. You know, the one that Mary McCoup lectures us about.

    What was YOUR role, Mary McCoup?

    Liked by 3 people

  17. mr.piddles says:

    “The Lawfare crowd is controlling the political activity, not the moonbat politicians.”

    Funny imagery there. The Dem Clown Show couldn’t impeach their way out of a freaking paper bag.

    Liked by 2 people

  18. Mark says:

    Who is paying them?

    Like

  19. Rynn69 says:

    Yes, it is very clear Pelosi and her Congress clowns are NOT calling the shots. Look at their faces at the impeachment vote presser. Not one looked happy, confident, or in control (except the pathological liar Schiff). Their faces showed people who seemed to be hostage to others – not people in control. If they were in control, they would have never voted to impeach PDJT. Even they know what political suicide is. Obviously, the political wing of the cabal was not ruling the day. It was the corrupt lawyer wing of the cabal.

    Like

  20. arsumbris says:

    Don’t stop at “the lawfare groups are calling the shots”. These lawyers work for organizations that receive million-dollar donations. Keep asking until you identify the donors.

    Liked by 1 person

  21. John Allan Wilson says:

    We learn about all these legal beagles highly trained and e x p e n s i v e, and this DOA impeachment is all they came up with?

    Like

  22. minnesotamike55 says:

    If team Trump gets a prime time down and dirty trial, the ratings will be huge and far surpass anything during the house hearings. That alone will demoralize democrats and these lawyers who think they are all that, will be crushed, because Americans will watch and see behind the democrat curtain.

    Like

  23. As a man thinkth says:

    David…my understanding is “hear say” evidence is not admissible evidence in any legal proceeding…to change the whistleblower form to allow hear say evidence SPECIFICALLY for this case is beyond suspicious. In fact, the hear say accusations could be the main reason this charade was billed as a Congressional inquiry ….because the hear say testimony would not be admissable evidence in authorized Impeachmemt proceedings.

    Like

  24. As a man thinkth says:

    The small group has “black files” on all of the dems and photos to prove it!!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s