Sunday Talks: Representative Elise Stefanik -vs- Maria Bartiromo…

Representative Elise Stefanik appears on Fox News with Maria Bartiromo to discuss her perspective on the impeachment inquiry.  As with all other republican members, including ranking member Devin Nunes and interim member Jim Jordan, Mrs. Stefanik has no idea where the Pelosi, Schiff and Lawfare goes from here.   Everything seems up-in-the-air.


Having listened to three interviews with Adam Schiff today as well as Shiff’s little toady, Eric Swalwell; and watching them also say they don’t actually have an outlined plan of what will come next from their “impeachment inquiry”, it all seems rather odd.

It appears Democrat leadership are taking a climate assessment of the electorate before returning to the next, and final, House session on December 2nd.  Pelosi, Schiff et al  previously committed themselves to a semi-formal process in the House resolution that began the impeachment inquiry.  However, they no longer discuss that process.

This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, CIA, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Donald Trump, Election 2020, IG Report FISA Abuse, Impeachment, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, THE BIG UGLY, Ukraine, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

249 Responses to Sunday Talks: Representative Elise Stefanik -vs- Maria Bartiromo…

  1. not2worryluv says:

    I’ve noticed during this weekend’s MSM shows the DEMS have switched the “I” word from Impeachment to IF…..their internal polls are exploding and that coupled with DEM debates have to spell LOSING-Bigly.
    Super-Sized lumps of coal in their Christmas Stockings this year.

    Liked by 8 people

    • FrankieZee says:

      You have to wonder if PIGLOSI will throw SHIFTTY SCHIFF under the bus, saying that he promised me, he had all the info to get Trump Impeached. I don’t think Piglosi wants to personally take the hit on this.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Mr e-man says:

        I would think you are right except for one thing. The news shows I listen to or read are all saying there is no crime, no impeachable offense, and in fact, Trump is doing what he should be doing. His “policy” approach toward Ukraine or anybody is his to do, not the bureaucrats, although there is something to be said about a President blowing up things that have been worked on over the years. I think any President should be careful about that but he still gets to do his own policy within the restraints of previous enforceable agreements.

        But if you are a Democrat watching CNN, the story is completely different. Joe Biden is an innocent man being railroaded by Trump and Trump is going to get us all killed. He has obstructed justice, made a mockery of our Constitution, used his office for personal political gain, and wants white supremacists to rule the country. CNN still pretends he is Putins puppet.

        We aren’t dealing with any kind of truth here. We are fighting a media propaganda machine and they are very powerful. Nanzi knows she has that cover and is squeezing out every last political point she can to damage President Trump. It works.

        Liked by 2 people

        • Apparently it doesn’t work very well anymore, and that’s because there are so many independent sources of news on the internet that people are using more and more often as they lose confidence in the fake news media. Trump’s poll numbers are also showing that this kind of thing doesn’t work with the American people anymore either. The Dems are pissing down the backs of the American people and trying to convince us it just raining. The American electorate is no longer buying what the dems are selling.

          Liked by 1 person

      • Deborah Fehr says:

        I agree with you. In the beginning they always appeared together, now not at all. I think Nancy is embarrassed. If that is possible.


    • Did you listen to and watch cheerleader Jake Tapper Sunday? He is livid that their disinformation campaign is failing. He was so confident that the IC’s plan, by people who are experts in staging coups, would work. It didn’t work. He absolutely hates Trump supporters.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. scrap1ron says:

    A wetted finger to the air shows an ill wind blowing, eh Dem-scum?

    Liked by 2 people

  3. meteorofpoo says:

    The democrats have crapped in their own hat and now they are wondering if they should try it on.
    All of the venom and hatred and outright lies haven’t gone unnoticed by Americans. The sentiment is that the left is too far left and well into wackadoodle crazytown. Not a place that America wants to go.
    At the end of the day, ignoring due process, ignoring the civil rights of the president…these rhings have made people think “if they can do it to the president, they can do it to me” and Americans dont want any part of that.

    Liked by 9 people

    • scrap1ron says:

      I’m thinking some of the heretofore Democrat lemmings in areas Trump won are realizing only they are going to take a political bullet for the Party of Moloch. Seems their fervor for the team is somewhat dampened.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Sofa King says:

      Ultimately, your comment gets to the nub of the problem:
      Democrats used to be the party of civil rights!
      Wtf happened to them??????


  4. It’s tactics vs strategy. Their tactic was to use impeachment to distract / deflect the upcoming IG report and Barr’s subsequent testimony on Dec. 11. But strategy means looking ahead to a Senate trial and having GOP counsel call witnesses that do NOT want to answer questions under oath, including Schiff and those who pull his strings.

    I was certain they’d impeach because they’re desperately living hand to mouth and impeachment offers the greatest possible media distraction. But a call from above, from Obama Coup Inc, may order them to pull the plug. Protecting the head of the snake and hiding treasonous deep state crimes likely overrides all else.

    Liked by 3 people

  5. flatlandgoober says:

    It’s way past too late, Dems. This monster is loose and looking for you. Nowhere for you to hide, and you can’t run fast enough. Tell your buds in the media they’re squarely in the drop zone, too.

    Liked by 3 people

  6. litlbit2 says:

    If for the DNC partnered with the GOPe don’t what would be next. Here’s a little big idea. You all have proven beyond a shadow of doubt, you can not govern, you can not legislate, you can not stop lying, you can not be honest, you can not fill the positions you were elected by the folks, just resign ASAP!
    Happy Thanksgiving, fixed it for ya!🦃🦃

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Kerry Gimbel says:

    Now that is a great Thanksgiving wish or prayer. I want no commies for the holidays!

    Liked by 1 person

  8. FishtheDish says:

    In addition, the dems have shot another blank impeachment claim. How do they bring up another without being the boy who cried wolf? If I were Trump I would say “In all the Ukraine impeachment mess – the important big question that needs to get answered is ‘So…what is the next hoax going to be?'”

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Leo D says:

    This whole thing went sideways on the Dems in a big way…and as bad, spineless, and clueless as the Republicans have generally been, and still are, regarding the lawfare angles, they should be given credit for being the prime movers on this.

    Personally, I think the uptick in the hysteria and the Ukraine aspect of impeachment has been largely to blunt the Horowitz/Durham release(s), which have the potential to be pretty devastating.

    Sundance has laid out how the timeline the Dems laid out from now until the Christmas recess just doesn’t seem to work. The Dems have to get this voted out of the House before the recess to have any hope of moving the focus away from the release of the FISA report on the 9th.

    I don’t see that happening. In fact, I think it is more likely than not that they don’t even take a vote on the ultimate impeachment resolution…I don’t think they have the votes. It is a career ending vote for Dems in Trump districts, and they know it.

    I think that all of these people are being honest when they say they don’t know where this is going…I don’t think Schiff/Pelosi know…this thing blew up in their faces. The tried to tightly stage manage the show, but the Republicans didn’t play ball…

    Like Mike Tyson said…Everyone has a plan until they get hit in the face…


    • Mr e-man says:

      The next vote is just to continue the charade in the House Judiciary Committee where it should have been all along. There, they will gin up the obstruction charges from the Mueller report and add on Ukraine. They are also looking to get the Grand Jury information to bolster that, along with tax returns, financial records, anything to find fault or exaggerate into faults.

      This Intelligence committee kangaroo court was meant to drive public opinion so Nanzi could fool those Dems in Trumps district into voting for impeachment. It looks like it may have failed but never underestimate the power of the media to drive public opinion.

      My district lost it’s R rep to a Dem in the midterms but the district also voted for Hillary. So we don’t count as one of those Trump districts. I wonder if the Trump districts are besieged right now with Democrat/MSM propaganda or if they can see through the schiff. Definitely all about propaganda.


  10. Sharon says:

    If Adam Schiff had enough self-awareness to realize how foolish and corrupt and hateful he looks (and is – since “out of the fulness the heart, the mouth speaks” – yup) he would be looking desperately for a safe place suitable for his condition. Maybe he would kill himself.

    Self-deception is a powerful thing.

    Whatever table he sits at on Thanksgiving Day — I can only think of two possibilities regarding the conversation: either lots of silence and sideways glances or a cacophony of cross talk and hateful comments about President Trump and the deplorables.


  11. The Democrats have no case. They are merely attempting to pass a Bill of Attainder, declaring on their own authority that the President is guilty of “some crime,” and punishing him for that crime, all without a trial or the Constitutional legal rights we’d afford to a common thief.

    Bills of Attainder are expressly prohibited by the Constitution at both the Federal and the State levels. And here we see the extremely obvious reason why. The President does not serve at the pleasure of Congress. He may be removed only for “high crimes” which the Congress has no power to “find” nor to declare. There is also a reason for this.


  12. Sol Benedict says:

    Evil carries within itself the seeds of it’s own destruction. Mark THAT you leftist LIbs. Now, Sherrod Brown, why don’t you pay more respect to the opinions of Conservatives in your district?


  13. David Farrar says:

    As cited by Rep. Schiff, 18 U.S.C. § 201: Bribery of public officials and witnesses does not apply to a sitting president.

    The U.S. Supreme Court in United States v. Sun-Diamond Growers of California, 526 U.S. 398, 404-405 (1999), describes the two crimes as follows: The first crime, described in § 201(b)(1) as to the giver, and § 201(b)(2) as to the recipient, is bribery, which requires a showing that something of value was corruptly given, offered, or promised to a public official (as to the recipient)…

    Here are the problems with using the “bribery” statute in defense of impeaching a duly elected president of the United States. There was no “bribery” statute when “Bribery” was inserted into the U.S. Constitution by its founders and framers. It was placed in the Constitution second only to Treason because they assumed the president would be its recipient, not the “giver.”

    Moreover, U.S. statutory law only applies to U.S. jurisdiction. It does not apply to foreign governments.

    Lastly, in terms of separation of powers, when legally pursuing a duly authorized act, the president cannot be charged with violating any U.S. statute. Whereas, accepting a foreign bribe to effectuate a duly authorized act, would meet the constitutional requirements of “Bribery” and not violate the separation of powers doctrine.


  14. mugzey302 says:

    When the FIRST Ukraine call transcript is released, the American people will learn about the child-rape vacations in Ukraine by American politicians and bureaucrats. At least the Americans who are interested in truth and likely to vote. (Maybe not those who follow the Kardashians and other soap operas.) Organ harvesting, sale of body parts, stolen infants shipped to America ~ and that b*tch, the former ambassador (who is controlled by the CIA) knows all about it. That’s why the dems are pulling back, to regroup.


  15. CABJOB says:

    Pelosi didn’t throw lying Schiff under the bus – he did all by himself. such a loser!


  16. Honeybuckets says:

    We are fighting a ‘take everybody down’ strategy. The dimms will move forward on a vote to impeach the president and it will pass the House.
    Why? Simple. The dimms and their ally the MSM at this late stage of an election year, have more success slowing to a crawl the administration and doing all the ‘smear’ to damage Republicans.
    Their strategy is relatively successful.


  17. Honeybuckets says:

    We are fighting a ‘take everybody down’ strategy. The dimms will move forward on a vote to impeach the president and it will pass the House.
    Why? Simple. The dimms and their ally the MSM at this late stage of an election year, have more success slowing to a crawl the administration and doing all the ‘smear’ to damage Republicans.
    Their strategy is relatively successful.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s