House Intelligence Committee Impeachment Hearing – Day Two – 9:00am ET Livestream

Today at 9:00am ET, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence will hold the second day of open hearings for the impeachment of President Donald Trump. Todays testimony will come from former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch.

Marie Yovanovitch is a woman of dubious character who was removed from the administration prior to the July phone call between U.S. President Trump and Ukraine President Zelenskyy. Ms. Yovanovitch has coordinated both her deposition and public hearing comments with the Democrat staff of the committee.

Fox News Livestream LinkPBS Livestream LinkHPSCI Livestream Link



This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Donald Trump, Election 2020, Impeachment, Legislation, Live Streaming, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Ukraine, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1,403 Responses to House Intelligence Committee Impeachment Hearing – Day Two – 9:00am ET Livestream

  1. Troublemaker10 says:

    If Trump’s tweets are witness intimidation (they aren’t), then why aren’t Democrat tweets witness intimidation?

    Liked by 4 people

  2. butch cassidy says:

    If facts mattered this hearing would not have happened today and people would already have been indicted. So this is not about facts, it’s about politics and public perception. On those 2 points the republicans failed miserably. We here on this site know this is a sham, the rest of the country gets their news from the msm, and they are having a field day with today’s bs. Terrible game plan today.


  3. Mist'ears Mom says:

    Why cant any of our republicans answer the f-ing question “do you think she was smeared” why can’t any of them say NO! instead they freakin twist themselves into a pretzel with an non-committal bs answer.

    Liked by 3 people

  4. Troublemaker10 says:

    Liked by 2 people

  5. Troublemaker10 says:

    Liked by 1 person

  6. patti says:

    Liked by 6 people

  7. patti says:

    Liked by 2 people

  8. Troublemaker10 says:

    Liked by 3 people

  9. Troublemaker10 says:

    Liked by 2 people

    • DSK66 says:

      Pro tip/inside baseball:

      Bottom line, up front: Ukraine is a total sh*t show, and everyone in the USG knows it. Basing an impeachment on any UKR-related “fact pattern” is beyond insane.

      Briefly: country riven b/n some local nationals trying to “fix” things and very powerful institutions/individuals who, well, enjoy the fruits of corruption and egregious behavior.

      I spent considerable time, incl in-country, dealing w the latter. As an old example, and b/c it’s now public information, look up “Orshansky and Montelect”.

      Again, I stress: for anyone–such as a long-serving State Dept official–not to completely understand the above, is farcical at best. To not comprehend how this would affect Presidential decision-making is preposterous.

      Chuck her testimony out the window…with prejudice.

      Liked by 1 person

  10. Justin Green says:

    This week’s takeaway:

    Kent, Taylor, and Yovanovich were all wired into the Ukrainian scene to know all the dirt on Trump, but are so ignorant of the Ukraine that they are almost completely ignorant of Obama/Biden/Kerry corruption, lol.

    They’re either liars or incompetent, and I suspect both. They all three perjured themselves this week.

    Liked by 1 person

  11. LouisianaTeaRose says:

    General observation: lot of punditry demonstrating handwringing r/t poss Anita Hill effect in anticipation of the masculine horde abusing the witness-faire…

    Obvious to me that the only “man-abuses-woman-in-hearing” occurred Schiff-on-Stefanik.


    • jeans2nd says:

      Actually, Schitt treated Stefanik as an equal, which is what wymyn claim they want, and the Republicans treated Yavanowitch like a snowflake.

      As for me and mine – we want to be treated with respect. Today, neither female received respect.


  12. Rose says:

    I hope someone is investigating her financial documents etc.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. individualright says:

    I want to know what the lady ambassador’s real job was in Somalia?
    trump’s tweet said she messed it up, too. Her job must have been to cause chaos so the Clinton’s could come in and rape the country.


  14. Troublemaker10 says:

    Liked by 3 people

  15. Rynn69 says:

    Nobody cares about any of this – it is a colossal waste of time and every American taxpayer ought to be PI$$ED.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s