Pelosi Likely to Follow-up December Impeachment Vote with USMCA Ratification…

Leader Kevin McCarthy just put some specific dates to a sequence we anticipated several months ago.

During a Fox interview with Laura Ingraham (I’ll look for video) McCarthy predicts Speaker Pelosi will bring up the impeachment vote on/around December 16th; then follow-up the impeachment vote with USMCA ratification and the budget passage on/around December 20th allowing the Democrats to go home for the holidays with all three goals accomplished.

This prediction by Leader McCarthy is very likely. Earlier today Speaker Poli-Grip said passing the USMCA was “imminent“.  In essence, she’s holding the USMCA vote as an ace to highlight a bipartisan legislative accomplishment by her party.

We noted last month: Nancy Pelosi will bring the USMCA to a vote timed with the impeachment vote. This plan allows democrats to try and dilute the political nature of the impeachment scheme by referencing the Trump administration USMCA vote as an example of Democrats not being political. This is how they scheme.

…’See, we’re not politically motivated, we’re giving the same president we are impeaching a win; because this trade deal is in the best interest of America.  Just like the impeachment of this corrupt president is in the best interest of America’….

This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Election 2020, Impeachment, Legislation, media bias, NAFTA, Nancy Pelosi, USMCA. Bookmark the permalink.

149 Responses to Pelosi Likely to Follow-up December Impeachment Vote with USMCA Ratification…

  1. Linda K. says:

    Winning for Trump and the american people. Hopefully, she will not attempt to impeach Trump after the inquiry.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Bill Durham says:

      This is all Kabuki theater that gives us the illusion that there’s a difference between the two parties. C’mon man! You folks should know better. There is no upside to Senate Dems. Republicans, or the uniparty to have a Senate trial and have their schemes exposed. There is no upside for Mitch to set up Trump and have a kangaroo Court. None. The only option is for the uniparty to force Nancy to stand down. She is not bigger than the uniparty or their interest. Trump ain’t going nowhere. Even if they removed him he is on the ballot and can run anyway. Or threaten to run. Can you imagine how epic that would be. How many people would vote for Trump just to stick it to the swamp? Lol. Trump has this. They will fold a losing hand.

      Liked by 11 people

      • YeahYouRight says:

        Bill, I have been thinking the same thing. The Senate has figured out that this thing should NOT be dead on arrival. Burr was explaining the other day that a Senate trial will hurt the Dems, and the Republicans will enjoy it! Their dirty laundry will be televised all day every day, while their pathetic Senate presidential hopefuls are grounded during the opening primaries! The Dems screwed themselves! USMCA is Trump’s accomplishment, and he’s been promoting it almost all year! They’ll just be admitting he’s right! And to top it off, of course there’s nothing stopping us from putting Trump back into the White House after they remove him, which will make her hear explode, shooting Poli-Grip everywhere!

        There is no downside for Trump, and no upside for the nakedly partisan Dems heading into the election with no accomplishments of their own, other than dividing the country and squandering our money on their corrupt attempt to skew the election.

        Liked by 2 people

      • jmuniz1 says:

        Yes there is they have nothing on our President it will make and is already making Mitch look like a fool. McConnell needs our President for his 2020 election if not he will lose. It would be much better if he loses that way our President can pick a new Senate leader we will still have the majority.

        Like

    • jmuniz1 says:

      Our President is not going to sign it he will blame it on the democrats. He will I do not like whats in it. He will play her has has for the last three years she is in panic mode. No victories for Nancy and the GOPe. Wait he will not get impeached its all a sham like Brad Pasquale said.

      Like

    • Toenail says:

      Linda K. – You must be joking! We know she is going to impeach President Trump. That was decided a long time ago. After all Pelosi’s son may be implicated in the Ukraine.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Greg1 says:

    Twisted scheming by twisted schemers.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Tl Howard says:

      I long for the days of Tip O’Neill.

      Liked by 3 people

      • namberak says:

        Thanks for the inadvertent laugh as your comment caused me to recall something from many moons ago and pardon the random discursion… In the fall of 1984 I happened to find myself in Bangkok visiting ex-pat friends, and was invited to some club … maybe a college affiliated alumni club? … for its Sunday brunch. Playing on the TV in the corner above the buffet line was some sort of a US news synopsis program. People were filling their plates with one eye on the news from home. At some point a story about a budget impasse came on and there on the screen was the corpulent Tip O’Neill lumbering up the steps into the White House. With my brain:mouth filter disengaged I blurted out “the original hog at the public trough”. Fortunately, everyone laughed. 🙂

        Liked by 1 person

    • Grandma Covfefe says:

      Then Speaker Poli-Grip (I am still laughing over this one…good one, Sundance)….will then declare and gloat that only the “Do-Nothing Dems” saved American jobs, American Farmers, etc. They are going to try to pass this off as their own creation, their own idea and their own “love” for America. Blah blah blah.

      Liked by 8 people

  3. Gunner says:

    No one — no one — no one — buys anything that emanates from this pathetic creature’s piehole.

    Liked by 4 people

  4. flatlandgoober says:

    We Deplorables aren’t nearly as stupid as you thing, Poli-Grip. In fact we’re very good at keeping score. Impeach our POTUS and you’ll find out how good.

    Liked by 8 people

  5. Perot Conservative says:

    I thought the CTH viewpoint was Pelosi was scheming with Justin Trudeau of Canada to block USMCA, and if he won his election, they would scuttle it; if he lost, then possibly a vote.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Perot Conservative says:

      CTH 4 weeks ago: “…Speaker Pelosi is waiting to see if Trudeau can win re-election. If Canada re-elects Trudeau on October 21st, Pelosi will announce the labor provisions are not strong enough within the USMCA deal; discussions with the Trump administration are not resolving the issues; the U.S. workers are not protected enough, and she is tabling any vote.”

      “Speaker Pelosi will then wait until after the 2020 election. The purpose is political.”

      https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/10/17/nancy-pelosis-usmca-strategy-for-2020-is-contingent-upon-the-canadian-election/

      I’m thrilled it may pass. I’vd been hammering the Do Nothing Democrats, diplomatically, on liberal sites, saying they would be blistered in 2020 in the Midwest over no border funding, no infrastructure, and no USMCA. POTUS wouldn’t say it, but I did.

      Liked by 4 people

      • L4grasshopper says:

        The vulnerable Dems desperately need an issue to balance a yes vote on their unsubstantiated impeachment.

        Liked by 4 people

        • 🍺Gunny66 says:

          This^^^^^….That plan regarding Canada is shot thru with holes now due to the impeachment clown show.

          The country is fed up with the “do nothing” Congress and is itching to throw them out.

          As stated above, the Dems need a win….or to lie about a win to keep the majority in the House…..

          But in my opinion the House and the Senate screwed this up like trying to “Herd Cats”

          Even Miss Lindsey’s little speech the other day was part of the Senate plan.
          Now both plans to Impeach are a burning wreckage.

          “A Bridge too Far”

          Our President beat them badly….They may never recover……..

          The best option for the Globalists now is to leave us alone. Lay low….Get your money from somewhere else……

          Liked by 4 people

        • stripmallgrackle says:

          Nancy is fixated on the notion that a scalp and a participation trophy will be the winning ticket for the democrats next year. You go, girl.

          Like

      • j'accuse says:

        Pelosi says many things she never follows through on. If she sees a political advantage to delaying it to avoid Trump claiming a win before the 2020 elections she’ll do it. Likewise if the impeachment fizzles or blows up in her face then she’ll likely find issues in USMCA that need tweaking as SD fortold. It’s been clear since last year’s budget to present that Pelosi will not grant the White House even the appearance of a legislative achievement. .

        Liked by 5 people

        • Perot Conservative says:

          And I could write you a BLISTERING campaign ad, with the help of a video guru.

          President Trump works endlessly for border security.
          PELOSI: picture in Hawaii.

          Trump working for USMCA.
          PELOSI in Paris, drinking.

          POTUS lobbying for an infrastructure bkll. “Speaker Pelosi, work with me to Make America Great Again!”
          PELOSI in Napa (pictures).

          POTUS signing prison reform, opening a new LNG plant.
          PELOSI galavanting in Europe.

          It could be a Boulabaise of Trump work, or just USMCA, or specifically Midwest issues, but the contrast is sharp. I know a political campaign manager who made a smaller election all about a politician taking Limo’s. He had mailers with a large Limo driver in suit, and then a list of wasted monies on various gov’t spending.

          Liked by 4 people

  6. Dee Paul Deje says:

    If you ask a reasonable question of the speaker you get called “Mr. Republican Talking Points”.

    Liked by 7 people

    • mikeyboo says:

      I share Mr. Rosen’s annoyance with Pelosi. Her cranky reaction to his question was uncalled for. On the bright side, her churlish response signaled awareness: She is losing the battle.

      Liked by 7 people

      • Sherri Young says:

        She looks like a wobbly stack of Lincoln logs or a kid’s building blocks. Not her best day.

        Liked by 4 people

      • John Obidienzo says:

        Her answer really was…I’m President….Your coming into “my wheelhouse”–she has power over the Presidency…she also chortled…. Article I Article I….it is obvious to me that when the Democrats took the House ….she believes she became President

        To Sundance’s point about Impeachment and USMCA, It’s Bribery plus Cruelty.
        Bribery: It’s Bribery by her own understanding. She gives her caucus USMCA they give her impeachment.

        Cruelty: Give the President a Pyrrhic Victory on USMCA by parading him around Washington–king of fools–Quasimodo–wearing the crown of impeachment.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Zorro says:

      Wow.,, attacking the beyond reproach free press. Isn’t that impeachable?

      Liked by 5 people

  7. RedWave2020 says:

    How effective do you think this strategy will be with moderate voters? I’m curious how many people will buy that. It is interesting to predict how people who do not pay attention to politics and go on with their lives end up feeling about these tricks. Do you think voters in swing districts will give the democrats their house seats again if they pull this con.

    Like

  8. albertus magnus says:

    Great news!

    Like

  9. Lion2017 says:

    Keep digging your hole 3rd rate. This will backfire Bigly!

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Hoosier_Friend? says:

    For years everyone told me to “take the high road”, which is code for suck it up and take it.

    No more. Screw Piglosi, screw the corruptocrats and screw Soros and his globalist shills in the deep state!

    #WAR!

    Liked by 1 person

  11. Parker Longbaugh says:

    I simply cannot imagine living every single moment of my life while planning my next lie.

    What waste.

    Our lives are so short and there are so many genuinely wonderful people and experiences to enjoy.

    Liked by 16 people

  12. jeans2nd says:

    Oh, so this is Pelosi’s quid pro quo, aka bribery, aka extortion, to the Socialist democrats.
    Pelosi allows the Socialist democrats to impeach, the Socialist democrats give Pelosi a vote on budget and USMCA.

    Thought quid pro quo aka bribery aka extortion was impeachable?
    Could one impeach a House Speaker?

    Liked by 4 people

  13. Robert Smith says:

    That’s Nancy being able to work with Trump — in between trying to set him up, impeach him and jail him and his entire family.

    I’ll take it!

    Nancy was always going to do Coup impeachment anyway.

    Liked by 1 person

  14. MDNA I says:

    Another story w/in just the past 12 hrs that says stakes are getting higher b/c everyone’s elevating their game…. at once terrifying & thrilling

    Like

  15. Perot Conservative says:

    Most people have no idea the trade reset Sundance has laid out.

    I specifically spoke with someone who exports fairly large shipments to Asia weekly, and he appeared to have little insight. I educated him with just some baby steps.

    Liked by 1 person

  16. Ironclaw says:

    Why wait? Let’s do it now.

    Like

  17. Julia Adams says:

    I watched the McCarthy segment on the Laura Ingraham show tonight. I thought he did a good job. He also insinuated that it’s a foregone conclusion that the House will impeach Trump in December. Pelosi is too far invested and cannot turn back now. My guess is she knows she has the votes. She owes an impeachment vote to the people who put her back into power.

    I despise Nancy Pelosi. She is a dangerous, atrocious and dishonest person.

    Liked by 6 people

  18. alliwantissometruth says:

    The only way to be “governed” by the corrupt, the criminal and the immoral is by the consent of the ignorant, the manipulated and the perpetually stupid

    Liked by 1 person

  19. The Third Man says:

    The level of Dem voter mental retardation is mind boggling, below moron, even below imbeciile.
    Idiot IQ ranges from 0 to 25.
    Then consider millons are alien invaders who don’t speak English and are illiterate in the 3rd world s—-oles from which they oozed.
    Consider terrorists, human traffickers, drug dealers/addicts/alcoholics.
    All they do is eat, pee, and poop.
    They are no value to society, humanity, civilization at all.

    Like

    • Sherri Young says:

      Actually, the PhDs in my extended family are solidly Dimm.

      Like

      • 13wasylyna says:

        Doesnt make them smarter in any real way. It actually makes them easier to manipulate because they succumbed a long time ago to the control of leftists in higher ed.

        I have a Brother who is a Mechanical Engineer who was a plant manager in Louisiana….he told me he couldnt vote Trump because he had daughters….I said Im voting Trump and I am a female and have daughters. It was the lamest reasoning Ive ever heard. But book smart doesnt make you smarter

        Liked by 3 people

      • lotbusyexec says:

        I was told a long time ago as i moved my way through the academic ladder that A BS Bull “Schiff” an MS is more “Schiff” and a PhD is piled high and deeper. Academics by nature are Dems but NOT me – I wear my MAGA hat proudly and try to “educate” every chance I get. Any hard working person who is a Dem by nature is not truly smart. I’ll take my PhTD (Philosophy in Trump Doctorate) any day! MAGA and by God let’s KAG – vote and wear your support for PDJT proudly. May we all fight everyday for PDJT just as hard as PDJT fights for us 24/7.

        Liked by 3 people

        • littleanniefannie says:

          As a Trump supporter, I have an MEd (that’s Morally Educated). Most Democrats are members of the Phi Kappa Beta fraternity (it’s not for intelligence—it means Proudly Killing Babies).

          Like

  20. Thus revealing that her, and her party’s, self-centered concept of “impeachment” is nothing more and nothing less than “politics.”

    Because, “you know, the Executive Branch really isn’t a co-equal part of our Government. The Executive serves at the pleasure of Congress, and the Legislature can depose the Executive on our own authority … simply by passing … a Bill of Attainder.”

    Ummm ….

    Liked by 1 person

    • L4grasshopper says:

      It will be interesting to see how many Articles of Impeachment Piglosi drafts, and how specific they will be.

      So one on bribery WRT Ukraine & one on obstruction?

      Are they going to come up with a couple that are never the subject of any hearings, secret or public?

      Like

      • Zorro says:

        I’ve seen some possibilities. This one from CNN.

        “One member who spoke with CNN on background about the ongoing process said that while there could be just a few Articles of Impeachment focused on larger transgressions like abuse of power or obstruction of justice, the report itself could be an opportunity to provide Democrats room to include more specific violations including things like emoluments violations, specific incidences of abuse of office related to Ukraine or even alleged obstruction from the Mueller report.”

        I’ve also heard “racism and bigotry” and “family separation”.

        Like

        • 🍺Gunny66 says:

          And…..jaywalking…….littering…..giving away Burger King burgers for quid pro quo, not providing ear protection on chopper pressers….moving to Florida to avoid taxes….

          Oh the agony……not taking a paycheck……wait…..is that Government quid pro quo?

          You just can’t make this stuff up….

          Liked by 2 people

          • steph_gray says:

            You just can’t make this stuff up…

            😆😆😆

            Well, normal honest deplorables can’t, but the deep state et al make it all up every moment of every passing day.

            Like

  21. L4grasshopper says:

    That timeline will put the impeachment vote about 2 weeks or so after the IG Report drops, and hopefully a few high level indictments.

    Like

    • Robert Smith says:

      Just as this is Nancy’s version of being able to work with Trump, we can just as easily say Trump can work with Democrats as the crushing of the Coup happens.

      Like

  22. SharkDiver says:

    I SOOOO disagree with Sundance on this. There is NO way in hell that Pelosi puts impeachment up for a vote and sends it to the Senate for a trial that will lay bare the entire scheme. There is NO upside to this strategy.

    Like

    • Robert Smith says:

      I think Nancy wants a Trump impeachment to be her “legacy” as she thinks she can taint him forever.

      Like

      • Sherri Young says:

        This is Nanzi’s last term as Speaker of the House. She ought to be more mindful of her legacy. There won’t be anyone who will spin words in her favor once the gavel is out of her hands.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Robert Smith says:

          To clarify, I mean to say Nancy would think of that as a positive. I think her desire to “win” is that great.

          Like

          • Sherri Young says:

            I think she was a-okay with going for an impeachment. She and Adam Schiff apparently thought they had PDJT caged, then the call transcript was released.

            She may throw her hands up in the air and decline to call the vote but blame her decision on the Republicans. She can posture about her prayer life and declare that the Republicans would rip the country asunder rather than admit that there is a criminal in the White House. She sees that it is her solemn duty to stand in the gap and save the union from destruction. Chairman Schiff is a great statesman who has brought to light for the American people to see the evil of Donald Trump’s character and unlawful behavior. It is up to the people to impeach this racist, misogynistic, Islamophobic, homophobic president at the ballot box.

            After that, she can turn and (unsteadily) walk away from the microphone without taking questions.

            Like

            • Rhoda R says:

              That seems like a realistic scenario. Now, does the democrat caucus have the intelligence to accept something like that?

              Liked by 1 person

            • john says:

              A supposition that cant be easily dismissed is that Pelosi is using impeachment to crush her left flank. Having a reason to blow up lying pedophile Schiff, who destroys DemComm credibility with every word he utters, may be a bonus.

              This isnt to say Pelosi is a moderate. She is all in on globalist tyranny. But politically, she is astute enough to realize that once the shehag lost, it was time to retreat, not go full bore socialism that could then be rejected by the bulk of We the People.

              Like

              • Sherri Young says:

                That’s a thought.

                There are easier ways to clean out the Dimm congressional delegation. She is careful about optics. If she needed to invoke discipline, it would be in caucus. What Schiff is doing is high risk for the party. She shores up her own power by shoring up the party.

                Like

      • Christopher Johnson says:

        By now even a mental midget like her has to realize that if they actually impeach him, that President Trump will wear it as a badge of honor to be impeached by the corruptocrats for actually putting America first.

        President Trump can’t be tarnished or tainted by these people because he always owns the downside and places responsibility where it belongs… his impeachment says nothing about him accept that he’s been effective in wrecking the Swamp’s plans and everything about the corrupt socialists who know they can’t actually beat him in terms of swaying the American people.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Well she’s kind of boxed herself into a corner, but I’m also not convinced yet that there will be a vote. We’ve had one day of the impeachment “hearing” so far, and it didn’t go so well for the DIMs. I can easily envision another whole week of testimony that doesn’t go the way they think it will… did you imagine in your wildest dreams that Robert Mueller would perform so poorly?

      And there’s still the wild card of the Barr and Horowitz investigations, which could could potentially alert even the most disinterested voters that our Democracy is truly at stake.

      Liked by 3 people

    • FPCHmom says:

      You are assuming the senate will lay bare the scheme rather than play along. They could do a sham trial and remove him too.

      Like

      • GP says:

        Hi FPC-and that is a faulty assumption. IMO this is a done deal. Nan-nan and Mitch have already spoke and the House will vote to impeach. Then Mitch has all the leverage he needs against Trump. As in Mr. President do this and/or don’t do that or you’re gone.. IMO there are many Senator’s who would be just fine with getting rid of Trump, the non-club member party pooper.

        Like

  23. parleyvous says:

    Watch out for poison pills …. protecting big tech censorship

    Like

    • Robert Smith says:

      That would be changing a negotiated deal which is a no-go I would think.

      Like

    • GP says:

      Hi Parleyvous-yes, that is what I read…that protecting big tech censorship will be in the bill. I suppose Trump could veto the bill if it has too many poison pills-but it seems POTUS very much wants to get USMCA done

      Like

      • Rhoda R says:

        I don’t think that it’s so much that Pres Trump wants USMCA done as he wants NAFTA undone. Wasn’t there speculation about nine months ago that he’d be just as happy to revert to the pre NAFTA trade agreements?

        Liked by 1 person

        • steph_gray says:

          Yes, speculation by sundance – and I completely agree.

          VSGPDJT is ultimately okay with both pre-Nafta and as much Chinese tariff as he thinks will do the job to stoke our American economic engine.

          Always makes me think of the moment in Atlas Shrugged where the government Corruptocrats think they have power over John Galt.

          GALT: “I’m always open to a deal.”
          HEAD CORRUPTOCRAT: “I knew it!” cried Mr. Thompson triumphantly, slamming his fist down on his own knee. “I told them so—all those fool intellectual theorizers, like Wesley!”
          GALT: “I’m always open to a deal—with anyone who has a value to offer me.”

          Like

  24. CopperTop says:

    Hehehe they are going to ratify a treaty that if one looks closely has all the same NON quid pro quo conversations that got the ‘deal done’.

    Oh DEM wabbits are going to wun themwelves wagged unwinding their twetchery.

    Liked by 2 people

  25. hokkoda says:

    Gee, I’m shocked. Oh wait, no I’m not. I said this would happen back in September. The vote was always going to happen, regardless of the hearings. They could have had a parade of people saying “the whistleblower lied and none of it is true”, and the Democrats would still have the vote to impeach.

    Keep your expectations low on the IG Report folks, and subsequent indictments. I’m having a Chief Justice John Roberts / Obamacare feeling as I watch all this play out. Back when Roberts declared Obamacare constitutional, I woke up that morning even before it was announced that SCOTUS was issuing their decision, and wrote, “They’re going to uphold Obamacare.” I just have that feeling in my gut here, and I could be wrong, and I hope I’m wrong. But I’m not usually wrong, which is why I think nothing is going to happen and everybody here, on the radio, on the TV shows and whatnot is going to have their “Fitzmas / Mueller / MSNBC Maddow crying” moment.

    Like

  26. SharkDiver says:

    I SOOOO disagree with Sundance on this. There is NO way Pelosi allows a vote that will send it to the Senate where a trial will lay bare the entire corrupt scheme. Absolutely no upside for the Dems in this scenario.

    Like

    • dogsmaw says:

      How many times do you SOOOO disagree?

      Like

    • hokkoda says:

      It’s already decided. It was decided a long time ago. The hearings are just the standard Communist show-trial. It’s not like we haven’t seen this kind of thing before. “Guilty, because we said so, and we have the votes.”

      Like

    • Zorro says:

      While Ukraine is the main story for impeachment, the Democommunists have many more articles they will be passing along to the Senate basically every false narrative from the past couple years. Racism, bigotry, family separation, emoluments, Mueller innuendo, etc.

      Like

  27. TEWS_Pilot says:

    I always thought the Jackass was the perfect mascot for the Democrats, but now the Kangaroo is looking more appropriate. Most folks have heard of the “Jackalope,” described as a jackrabbit with antelope horns, the combination of a “jackrabbit” and an “antelope.” Maybe the Democrats could adopt a combination mascot that would be a Jackass-a-Roo. It would look like a Jackass that hops around on its big flat hind legs, punches everybody it meets, and has a pouch where it carries all its dark money.

    Liked by 3 people

  28. Troublemaker10 says:

    Pelosi had the votes for impeachment before she ever opened up the inquiry. They want to campaign on Trump being impeached. They will then call the Republicans in the Senate corrupt for not removing him from office . That’s their 2020 campaign.

    I think, however, that Passing USMCA will do more than negate any damage their impeachment hoax causes.

    Like

    • Joebkonobi says:

      Trump rallies will make the difference. He will make sure he gets full credit for USMCA, as he should and deserves.

      Dems have no counter to his rallies and the will only get bigger and louder.

      Liked by 2 people

    • steph_gray says:

      Maybe she had the votes, maybe she didn’t.

      Far bigger, a likely: she is losing them every second this Coup Klutz Klan Circus plays out.

      Remember “They never thought she would lose”?

      Now it’s time to remember “They never thought POTUS would release the transcript.” (Aaaand there’s one more transcript to come).

      We count on two things: the enemy will underestimate our champion at every turn, and he always wins.

      Like

    • Zorro says:

      Sounds nice but it hasn’t been brought up as a subject in any of the questioning in hearings.

      Like

    • Sherri Young says:

      That treaty absolutely should be brought up in the coup hearings. Since this is all for show and for Adam Schiff to make his sales pitch, the Republicans need to educate the public too. All of the people in the room surely must be fully aware of the mutual assistance agreement with Ukraine, but most people on the other side of the screen are not.

      Liked by 1 person

  29. MAGADJT says:

    She has spun a lie to the vulnerable dems. “If you vote for impeachment, I’ll send you back to your districts with a win on the USMCA that you can talk about to voters.”

    Surely the vulnerable members know that #1 – Voters will attach the passage of the USMCA to POTUS, not to Congress, and #2 – If they vote to impeach, it doesn’t matter what they pass after that; they are going to be blamed for this farce.

    Liked by 3 people

  30. So AG Barr and POTUS have a MONTH of Swamp Revelations between now and Poly-Grip Pelosi’s “Shame Plan”.

    Liked by 1 person

  31. Mike says:

    She has no shame

    Liked by 3 people

  32. I S says:

    Poli-grip. OMG. Love it

    Liked by 2 people

  33. Track says:

    Now I know why so many people hate politicians. Nancy and Schiff are the scum at the top.
    God please continue to bless the USA and President Trump.

    Liked by 4 people

  34. Trenchanter says:

    So, we are waiting on Peloli because USMCA is a multi-national trade agreement? Fast-track authority gives Trump the ability to negotiate arrangements with individual countries. That’s what he has done with S.Korea, Japan, China, etc. If Congress won’t act on USMCA, why doesn’t Trump enact portions of the US-Canada and US-Mexico parts, as much as possible, as separate agreements and leave Nancy twisting in the wind?

    Liked by 1 person

    • POTUS DJT will do exactly that. You’re correct– the USMCA is set for FTA, and our VSG is in the enviable “Can’t Lose” position, with regard to the passage of the trade agreement. He wins either way, it matters not what Nancy decides to, or not to do.

      Pelosi is the one with the problem. Again, PDJT gets what he wants with either scenario. Nancy MUST bring the contract up for a vote, then get it ratified, or else she and the House Dims have NOTHING to hang their hats on… Nothing to show as any kind of achievement for two long years of work. And, while I don’t think there will be any difficulties getting Mitch to sign on, he’s got to get the USMCA passed in the Senate, or again– Nancy gets nothing. She has no option in which she can be the Master of her own Fate; all her moves are contingent on the participation of someone else.

      I’d much rather be in PDJT’s shoes, even with all things taken into consideration.

      Like

  35. Magabear says:

    Well, the demonrats might do what McCarthy is saying here, but then again, they could’ve voted to impeach after the Mueller inquisition too. They had nothing to impeach him on then just as they have nothing to impeach him on now. As I said before, they may have written a nice script with their Lawfare friends, but the stage act has been disasterpiece theatre for them.

    Liked by 1 person

  36. k4jjj says:

    Look at what these people will do to hold power. They are old and near the grave yet use their remaining time for such wickedness and will take nothing with them into the coffin as they decompose. Look at their sick definitions of “victory” Pathetic.

    Liked by 1 person

  37. Jan says:

    Shirley, she’ll make changes to it that will render it unacceptable to Pres. Trump, Mexico or Canada. I can’t see the U.S.CoC letting McConnell or Pelosi passing this through both houses. If it’s good for America, it must be killed or FUBARred.

    Like

  38. Rynn69 says:

    I may be in the minority, but I do not think Pelosi will bring up an impeachment vote before 2020 – not an inquiry or other non-impeachment vote, but an actual impeachment vote. This would be a mistake of gargantuan proportion. Not just to her party, but to the country. Absolutely nothing to gain by it and everything to lose. Pelosi is crazy in many ways, but I do not think she is this politically ignorant. Could be wrong…

    Like

  39. DebbieSemms says:

    In all fairness Sundance stated last month that if Trudeau won reelection Pelosi would not have a vote on the USMCA.

    Like

  40. 13wasylyna says:

    Oh so thats the deal….the Republicans get UsMCA and Pelosi gets Tumps head on a silver platter. Kevin McCarthy is playing his kabuki role as paul ryan as john boehner…..scream and holler about this and that and let the Uniparty have its way. I abhor the uniparty….conservatives are not represented. McCarthy loves being 2nd banana because like Ryan before him it requires nothing but acquiesing to the Democrat overlords

    Like

  41. DiogeneseVindicated says:

    I thought I heard here that USMCA would not be voted on if Trudeau won?

    Like

  42. Trump Train says:

    I thought the communist had to vote up or down on it and couldn’t not modify it?

    Like

  43. littleanniefannie says:

    ‘See, we’re not politically motivated, we’re giving the same president we are impeaching a win; because this trade deal is in the best interest of America. Just like the impeachment of this corrupt president is in the best interest of America’….”

    The Poli-Grip wouldn’t hold long enough for her to spit this out. Nazi cares zero about the best interest of America—if it doesn’t increase her power and her purse, she is disinterested! She is power motivated.pure and simple. The USMCA she will take to a vote will resemble the one that President Trump negotiated about like the impeachment inquisition resembles quid pro quo.

    Like

  44. Ish Kabibble says:

    A slight analysis disagreement with SD.
    The unions desperately want the USMCA ratified and they fund much of the Dem candidates and lobby that they may have indicated they’ll withhold to a degree if passage is not accomplished this year.
    The impeachment debacle, holiday attention spans and presidential races all give cover so as not to alert and infuriate her insane base that she knows will seek reprisals.

    Like

  45. Bth says:

    They are going to call the vote, because they must create a way to counter spin the OIG report as “retaliation”.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s