House Impeachment Public Hearings – Day One – William B. Taylor and George Kent – 10:00am Livestream…

The House Intelligence Committee will begin holding public hearings to impeach President Donald Trump today at 10:00am EDT.  The hearings are carefully scripted, organized and planned. Day One begins with Ambassador William Taylor and Deputy Assistant Secretary George Kent.  To support the Democrat impeachment effort all major media networks are carrying the event live, and promoting their anticipation of drama.

Impeachment Chairman Adam Schiff has threatened severe punishment if any member of congress speaks publicly about the CIA helping to organize the ‘whistleblower‘ effort.

Mr. Taylor currently serves as the Chargé D’affaires for the U.S. State Department in Ukraine. Mr. Kent serves as Deputy Assistant Secretary in the European and Eurasian Bureau at the U.S. Department of State.  Both State Dept. officials disagree with President Trump’s foreign policy which they hope will lead to his removal from office.

Fox News LivestreamFox Business LivestreamCSPAN LivestreamHPSCI Livestream




This entry was posted in 1st Amendment, 4th Amendment, 6th Amendment, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Donald Trump, Election 2020, Impeachment, Legislation, Live Streaming, Nancy Pelosi, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Typical Prog Behavior, Ukraine, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1,659 Responses to House Impeachment Public Hearings – Day One – William B. Taylor and George Kent – 10:00am Livestream…

  1. IGiveUp says:

    ‘The Real Ukraine Controversy’: John Solomon Exposes How Rogue US Embassy Conducted Foreign Policy

    “It is neither a conspiracy theory nor a debunked or retracted story. U.S. embassy officials DID apply pressure to try to stop Ukrainian prosecutors from pursuing certain cases.”

    Liked by 5 people

  2. Countrywatch says:

    See 1.30 on this videoclip where Republican Chris Stewart gets Kent and Ambassador Taylor to agree that noone is above the law, even if they are running to be President. They should face justice like everyone else.

    Liked by 6 people

  3. lettruthspeak says:

    I love how these two toadstools, especially Taylor, sit there and try and pretend they don’t have an agenda. Of course they do, and they make it so obvious. If you don’t have an agenda then why does your testimony lean towards everything that cannot be proven in a court of law. I didn’t see the whole hearing, not even half, but I wish to God someone would have asked those two dimbulbs this, “Gentlemen, why exactly do you suppose that you are hear today? What do you think or believe is going to be accomplished since you have no first hand knowledge about anything?” Crickets, crickets. I’m so embarrassed to be and American today. These sick, twisted, tickets in our Congress, wasting time, money and goodwill to put forth this pathetic, childish nonsense. A third grader could tell you there is no there there. Disgusting.

    Liked by 9 people

    • rcogburn says:

      We have voluntarily come before Congress to facilitate the coup d’etat of a sitting US President on national television.

      Aside from that, we have no agenda.

      Liked by 1 person

      • gda53 says:

        Someone on the Five is sympathizing that they have to hire their own lawyers in order to give their important “non-partisan” testimony.

        Oh boo hoo.

        A) Could they not have availed themselves of similar protection as others who decided not to testify?

        B) Does anyone believe that they are actually paying for their own lawyers?

        C) Who exactly ARE their lawyers? Not from Lawfare, surely?


    • jbrown says:

      Like! Spot on observation.


  4. pucecatt says:

    So let me get this straight , the whistleblower gets wind of a possible interview that is to be on “ cnn” and that Zelensky will announce investigations into the Bidens so he runs to congress in August to let them know the “ rumors “ Zelensky comes to town during the UN and congress thinks this is when he will interview with “ cnn” so congress aka NaN announces an impeachment inquiry without even seeing the phone call yet , so they jump the gun and it didn’t even happen 😂😂😂 damn fools and looks like somebody fed them a story 😂😂

    Liked by 2 people

    • WhiteBoard says:

      its the FISA RERUN all over – LEAK TO THE NEWS – Fake news – and the ARTICLE incites some activist fool to do something. I am giving them the benefit of the doubt that they werent in on it and WERE TRICKED (TAYLOR looks DUPED but definitely PRO-Europe and Anti-Trump)..

      and without them seeing the transcript they couldnt clarify the SPY’D Converstion (Baited lie whispered out to see who is spying and trace them later by what they say; HENCE THE IMPORTANCE OF dates of awareness).

      pg 50 vidnman transcript – CAUGHT – vindman says – As opposed to going into the standard communications system, it went into a different type, a different, more secure system… while i did have an account, it was not functioning properly, so i had to go analog and take a look at – get a hard copy of it – make some — annotate some changes to it, ….


  5. GraciesThor says:

    I’ve followed Sundance for at least three years and never commented but had to pitch in now Schiff said: “Impeachment Chairman Adam Schiff has threatened severe punishment if any member of congress speaks publicly about the CIA helping to organize the ‘whistleblower‘ effort.“

    1. What the h*** authority does he have to make such a threat!?

    2. Even if Horowitz or Dunham indicts what is the probability of getting a jury to convict in DC?

    Liked by 2 people

    • WhiteBoard says:

      Ethics complaint that removes someone from their committee as investigated. and I’d assume Schiff has the ethics committee stacked in favor.

      2020 is the deal! if we sweep it all – they will be destroyed by courts, jails, and time.

      Liked by 1 person

    • ezgoer says:

      What is the possibility that if there are indictments that any trial takes place before the 2020 election? And if Trump loses, the new Dem AG drops all the charges? I believe AG Barr is intentionally stalling to realize that scenario.


      • GP says:

        Hi ezgoer-and I agree that Barr is stalling. NO ONE IS GOING TO JAIL. Do away with the hope that the “Spygate” perpetrators are going to jail, because they are not going to jail. And as we await ANOTHER supposedly “devastating” IG report… it will just be another nothing burger.

        I’ve posted here several times, after 30 plus years as a Fed employee, I know for certain that anyone who’s anyone in the Swamp has one or more “get out of jail free” cards Now there were people fired, but they just went to work at a cushy, high salary job in the private sector. And there are people who we know were involved that are still at their job. Bruce Ohr comes to mind. And Peter Strzok, who was fired, was reported by the GW Pundit to have a visitors pass issued by Wray and Peter was participating in meetings at the FBI

        Everyone who could be indicted has let Barr know about their “get out of jail free: card(s) and will play them if they are indicted. Or their are friends of the conspirators that will use their card if need be.

        Nope-if you want justice you’ll have to mete it out yourself


  6. jeans2nd says:

    Dave Bossie (Citizens United), who ran the Clinton iimpeachment investigations for Newt Gingrich, was in the back of today’s hearings with Gaetz, Meadows, Zeldin.

    Bossie is jubilant! Bossie says today’s hearings were a slam dunk for Pres Trump’s guys, and Schitt whiffed.

    Liked by 12 people

  7. SmilinJackAbbott says:

    President Trump sets foreign policy, not unelected ambassadors. Taylor has an obligation to follow US foreign policy or resign.

    Taylor said it was clear Trump made aid conditional on investigations. That makes it US foreign policy. But Taylor had 3 meetings with the Ukraine President about the aid and didn’t follow what was clear policy(according to him). Nor did he follow US policy in his many meetings with Ukraine officials by linking aid to investigations.

    Again, he had a duty to follow The President’s policy or resign.

    He is either a) unethical or b) lying. Pick one.

    Liked by 3 people

    • jeans2nd says:

      c) All of the above

      Liked by 4 people

    • Chewbarkah says:

      Well made point. I’m picking “both.”

      Liked by 1 person

    • The only thing that should be abundantly clear – to Congressmen and Senators of both T-shirt colors, is this: “there is no high crime here.” Zero, zilch, nada.

      The only reason why Democratic Representatives would vote for anything is … because they are obedient lemmings, “loyal even unto death” to their Party Bosses and indifferent to their constituents, and to the Constitution … voting because “we were ordered to do so, and We Must Obey.”

      The comments about “international corruption in almost every country, including the United States,” do(!) resonate with American voters, who fully understood (as the Ukranian people also do …) that “Drain The Swamp™” actually means: “Take a Bite Out Of International High Crime!”

      The only people who would want these proceedings are … those who are “international criminals themselves.” And, gosh, where have I heard these names before?

      Liked by 1 person

  8. Newhere says:

    Who on God’s green earth wears a bow tie to an impeachment hearing. As a witness. Who wakes up in the morning to face the American people, to face the world, to testify about unseating the elected leader of the free world — and thinks to himself, shall I wear the green bow tie? And then decides that he will.

    What goes through a man’s head to DECIDE to present himself for the history books — for the gravest of testimony before God and his fellow humans dressed as a ten-year-old or a CLOWN?

    Liked by 10 people

    • vicarioushikermom says:

      Newhere, All of Treepers comments are intelligent and many are witty and this one did make me laugh. I agree. All I could focus on when that guy was talking was his stupid green bow tie. Definitely, a circus.

      Liked by 4 people

      • WhiteBoard says:

        Kent was a bitter cybaby wondering why the Yanovitch Ambassador lady got canned .. he thinks Guiliani did a fake smear campaign to remove her.. so Kent is going ot get even..

        to bad in his past he was a ‘whistleblower’ on bidens son having a conflict of interest with burisma.

        RBG is in the news – ding ding. signal for senate to start the impeach hearing to stall a nominee..


    • jeans2nd says:

      Ummm…it was considered gauche to wear his smoking jacket without bringing his wine spritzer and pipe?

      Liked by 2 people

    • IGiveUp says:

      I’m guessing you’re not a big fan of the femMan Cambridge, MA types. That’s what the state dept is all about.

      While we’re at it, who put that bug-eyed worm in center stage? It lends some credence to the outlier idea that Pelosi is trying to crush the far left of her party.

      Liked by 1 person

    • iswhatitis says:

      He reminded me of Pee-wee Herman.


    • jx says:

      At least he left the squirting lapel flower at home.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Coast says:

      Its an indication that he is somewhat “off”. And his testimony proved it.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Debra says:

      I think he did not want to be mistaken for Chris Wray . . .


    • GP says:

      Hi Newhere…you ask “What goes through a man’s head to DECIDE to present himself for the history books — for the gravest of testimony before God and his fellow humans dressed as a ten-year-old or a CLOWN?”

      Someone who sees themselves as the smartest person in the room, no matter the room or the subject. Someone that has been thoroughly indoctrinated by our college professor Marxists. These people really do believe they are right…that America is an evil empire that must give up it’s sovereignty and join the rest of the world in a New World order socialist utopia. Our universities,from top to bottom are Marxist, American hating, tax payer funded re-education camps.

      Parents and students pay big money and/or go into debt for the privilege of having Marxist/ Communist, ideas pounded into their head on a daily basis. I have read many cases where college professors have mini-busts of Marx or Lenin on their desk.

      Then there is the social side, where they are told that men can have periods and tampon machines are installed in the Men’s room, Think about what I just typed. Tampon dispensers are installed in Men’s bathrooms at many colleges.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Judith says:

        I saw stacks of Communist newspapers (showing a hammer and sickle) inside the cafeteria of a New York State SUNY college. This was on a student orientation weekend with parents present. I can only imagine what these people do after the parents all go home!

        Liked by 1 person

  9. iswhatitis says:

    Katrina Pierson article up on Townhall:

    Impeachment Has Jumped the Shark


  10. exdeadhead says:

    My takeaways after 5.5 hours: There is no hard evidence of malfeasance or crime. It may be the President working through his personal attorney mucked up State Department bureaucrat efforts in pursuit of their USA policy objectives, but . . .

    (1) This is presidential prerogative,
    (2) Official State channels were (allegedly) blocking Zelensky from passing helpful information about 2016 election which he wanted to share with USA, and
    (3) Democrats do not care about damage being done or worse damage potential if their impeachment would succeed. They hate our country, its history and traditions, and most of all our elected President.

    Nothing worthy of impeachment was presented, just the usual phony outrage. The President may have been out of concert with bureaucrats, but not surprising after 2.5 years of subversive Resistance.

    Liked by 11 people

    • calbear84 says:

      Nice summary. Thank you.

      Liked by 1 person

    • nimrodman says:

      “(2) Official State channels were (allegedly) blocking Zelensky from passing helpful information about 2016 election which he wanted to share with USA”


      When do we get to hear more about this?
      When does this get revealed and highlighted?

      Was anything said about it in today’s testimony?


  11. Johnny says:

    Seditious Nerds.

    That is all I heard today. Schiff needs to be thrown from Congress for this treasonous clown show


  12. calbear84 says:

    Almost 1,600 comments! Wow Ad Rem you need a raise $$ 🙂

    Liked by 2 people

  13. Kristin DeBacco says:

    Thank you to all Treepers here for giving me hours of reading in these 1500+ comments. I just could not watch this today.
    My heart hurts for our President.
    How dare they!

    Liked by 2 people

  14. LouisianaTeaRose says:

    I see lots and lots of fertile territory being plowed, cultivated, and enriched, and planted in preparation for a major crop-dusting by VSGPDJT in release of the “first” call to Pres. Z.

    It’s so much more exciting watching the dig-in/entrenchment knowing how it’s going to explode in their midst. Even those two witnesses gave some clues that it’s probably a REALLY BAD IDEA GOING THIS FAR OUT THERE……

    Liked by 3 people

    • Ma McGriz says:

      ” Even those two witnesses gave some clues that it’s probably a REALLY BAD IDEA GOING THIS FAR OUT THERE…… ”

      girl! it honestly looks like some of them are just beginning to wake up to that fact!

      have you ever witnessed more self incrimination than we’ve seen from this peach posse?

      Liked by 1 person

  15. Thanks to all those who watched and commented. I was not going to waste time on Shitty schiff!

    Liked by 1 person

  16. MDNA I says:


    • MDNA I says:


      • TPW says:

        Oh if the McConnell crew has their wish I don’t think it will be a lengthy trail ….many corrupt Republicans would be caught up in that. If given a good reason to turn against PT a swift vote to impeach without a trail would be my guess. Thats why Haley is waiting in the wings for 2020.


  17. cheekymeeky says:

    Here we go. The excuse not to shut it down.

    “Some Republican senators and their advisers are privately discussing whether to pressure GOP leaders to stage a lengthy impeachment trial beginning in January to scramble the Democratic presidential race — potentially keeping a half-dozen candidates in Washington until the eve of the Iowa caucuses or longer.”


    • Uh huh … “let’s hang the Sword of Damocles over the head of a President who we know has committed no crime, just for political reasons?” Yeah, let’s use the President as a pawn in our re-election game. 😡 After all, “the President serves at the pleasure of the Congress …”

      Liked by 4 people

    • mimbler says:

      Or is this the WP offering the dems an off-ramp for their clown car debacle?

      Don’t impeach because the nasty Republicans will play politics with the trial to interfere in the Democratic primary.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Matthew LeBlanc says:

      I bet those pushing for a lengthy trial include Romney, Collins, Murkowski, Sasse etc. McConnell letting a long drawn out trial occur in the Senate where even more Americans will be exposed to the Uniparty and its corruption is a fantasy not reality. These snakes would jump at the chance to get their pound of flesh from PDJT.



  18. TPW says:

    May be wrong on timeline but wasn’t HB still on the board when aid was being considered? If that is the case then when PT wanted corruption investigated for 2016. Biden was a part of that time including up until 2019.


  19. Sherri Young says:

    This coup needs to die right now and never make it to the Senate. If it gets to the Senate, it must be thrown out immediately.

    Filling federal judicial seats is one of the main goals of the Trump agenda. Trying an impeached president would stop cold the work of the Judiciary Committee. It would squander the opportunity to get judicial nominees through committee while Klobuchar, Booker, and Kamala Harris are busy campaigning.

    A trial would tie up the chief justice of SCOTUS. Ruth Bader Ginsburg called in sick to work today. A trial in the Senate would cause the Supreme Court to limp along.

    Don’t play stupid games.

    Liked by 2 people

  20. JG3 says:

    Everyone in districts where House Dims are up for reelection, flood their phone lines, respectfully promising to defeat them! if they vote for this SHAM! Then, get out and work to defeat them!!! This election is for ALL the marbles!

    The Lord is so good~

    Liked by 1 person

  21. Troublemaker10 says:


  22. Troublemaker10 says:


  23. Patience says:

    Stefanik… down to the second.


  24. Patience says:

    Fartwell is not wearing his Schtt-ocular-hypertension RELIEF lapel button.


  25. Patience says:

    Fartwell is beyond a fool
    >Ask Holmes about the security blankets

    >Ask Holmes about Crimea & Georgia


  26. Patience says:

    Oh man….. Will be havin somesex with Hurd !
    >Busy giving a foot massage first


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s