UNGA Bilat #6 – President Trump Meets With Prime Minister Johnson of U.K. – Video and Transcript…

Today, President Donald J. Trump met with Prime Minister Boris Johnson at the United Nations General Assembly. The two leaders reaffirmed the value of their Special Relationship and discussed ways to deepen bilateral ties, including through a comprehensive trade agreement. They acknowledged the importance of protecting the security of telecommunication networks, especially 5G, and agreed to continue close coordination to address tensions in the Middle East and respond to Iran’s increasingly belligerent behavior.  [Video and Transcript Below]

.

[Transcript] – PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, thank you very much everyone. It’s great to be with my friend, Boris Johnson. He just got a position that he’s having a very easy time with. It’s much easier than he thought. (Laughter.) They’re saying, “Is it tougher or easier?” He said, “Well, it’s…” — I guess, what he expected. I think it’s pretty much what you expected.

PRIME MINISTER JOHNSON: It is.

PRESIDENT TRUMP: And he’s doing a fantastic job. Not easy. But doing a really good job. And I think you’re going to make great progress come October, come November. But great progress for the country, long term.

PRIME MINISTER JOHNSON: October. October. October the 31st. (Inaudible.)

PRESIDENT TRUMP: The results are going to be — the results are going to start to show in November. But it looks to me like he has made some great progress. So it’s an honor to have him here.

We’re going to be discussing trade. We can quadruple our trade with UK. And we can, I think, really do a big job. Bob Lighthizer is here — our trade representative. Your trade representative is here. And they’re already scheduled today to continue negotiations.

But we can have substantially more trade with UK, and we look forward to doing that. So we’ll talk about other things also. It’s great to have you, Boris.

PRIME MINISTER JOHNSON: Well, thank you very much. It’s great to be here. And I certainly hope that we can make a lot of progress quite fast on trade. We’ve got our Secretary of State for International Trade, Liz Truss, is here. We hope to get going on that, always remembering that the NHS is not for sale.

But everything else — there’s a huge amount we can — we can do.

And I guess we’ll also talk a bit about Iran —

PRESIDENT TRUMP: We’ll be talking about that.

PRIME MINISTER JOHNSON: — and some of those difficult issues where I think we share a common perspective, and we want to dial things down but also make sure that people in the Gulf don’t get the wrong idea about what they can get away with. That’s a complicated issue. We have to make progress there as well.

PRESIDENT TRUMP: We’ll be talking about many things, and we look forward to it. And we’ll start in just a minute.

So thank you very much, everybody. Thank you.

Q Prime Minister Johnson, some of your critics are saying that you should resign because you misled the Queen with regard to shutting Parliament down. How do you respond to that?

PRIME MINISTER JOHNSON: Well, as I said earlier on — thank you very much. As I said earlier on, let’s be absolutely clear: We respect the judiciary in our country, we respect the court.

I disagree profoundly with what they had to say. I think it was entirely right to go ahead with a plan for a Queen’s speech. This is a — with the longest period. We haven’t had a Queen’s speech for 400 years. We’ve got a dynamic domestic agenda we need to be getting on with: more police on the streets, investment in our National Health Service, improving our education. We need to get on with that.

And, frankly, I think we need to get on with Brexit. That’s the overwhelming view of the British people. Whether they voted to leave or remain, they want to get this thing done by October the 31st. And that’s what we’re going to do.

PRESIDENT TRUMP: That was a very nasty question from a great American reporter. I’m shocked.

PRIME MINISTER JOHNSON: Was that — no, was that an American reporter?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: That’s an American reporter.

PRIME MINISTER JOHNSON: Was it? I thought —

PRESIDENT TRUMP: And he’s a good one.

PRIME MINISTER JOHNSON: But I think he was asking a question, to be fair, that a lot of British reporters would have asked me.

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, now that we have that out of the way — he’s not — I’ll tell you, I know him well: He’s not going anywhere. Don’t worry about him.

Okay, go ahead. Any other questions?

Q Any advice for the Prime Minister as to how he should deal with the judges?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: No, I think he’s dealing very well. Everything I see here is what — look, I’ve watched it very closely. He’s a friend of mine. I tend to watch friends closer than enemies, but the enemies you have to watch in a different way.

I think he’s doing very well. It’s a complicated subject, but they took a vote, and the vote was — I was there. I happened to be there the day of that vote.

PRIME MINISTER JOHNSON: Were you down at the vote?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: I made a prediction, even. I even made a prediction. And it was a correct prediction. And, you know, that was a long time ago. And it takes a man like this to get it done. And they have to get it done; otherwise, it would be a terrible thing to do it any other way.

I don’t see another vote. I don’t see anything happening. I think he’s going to get it done.

Q Mr. President, what was your reaction when you heard these UK supreme court decision? What was your reaction to it?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: I had no reaction. I just asked Boris. And, you know, to him, it’s another day in the office. He’s a professional. It’s just another day in the office.

PRIME MINISTER JOHNSON: Yeah, well, it’s — tomorrow is another day in Parliament. That’s what he means. (Laughter.)

PRESIDENT TRUMP: You know, we had — we had, Boris, the first couple of months, we had been — I think we were 0 for 7 with the Supreme Court. And since then, we won the wall, we won asylum, we won some of the biggest ones. We’ve had a great streak going.

But we — we started off, we were 0 for 7. And then as you will report — in fact, the first time we won, you were, like, shocked that we won. And since then, we’ve almost run the table. We’ve won a lot of decisions. So I’m sure that’s going to happen to you.

PRIME MINISTER JOHNSON: Well, we’re not counting our chickens. And we’re full of respect, as I say, to the justices of our — (laughter) — supreme court. But we’re going to — we’re going to push on. We’re going to respect what the court had to say, but we’re going to get on and deliver Brexit. That’s the — I think that’s what the British people want to see.

PRESIDENT TRUMP: In other words, he’s been very nice to the court, please. Okay? He has —

Q Mr. President —

PRESIDENT TRUMP: He has total respect for the court.

Yeah, Jeff.

Q Mr. President, on a separate subject, can you explain why aid to Ukraine was stopped?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Because I think that other countries should be paying also. Why is the United States the only one paying to Ukraine? And I’ve been talking about this for a long time — not only with respect to Ukraine, but a lot of other countries.

But, frankly, why isn’t Germany — I just met with the Chancellor — why isn’t Germany, why isn’t France, why aren’t these other countries paying payment? Why are we paying all the time? And nobody has given, I believe, more to Ukraine. You know, President Obama used to send pillows and sheets. I sent anti-tank weapons and a lot of things to Ukraine. We think that it’s very important and — by the way, I don’t know if you know it or not, that payment was made.

But I wanted to get other countries. Other countries should also pay because, frankly, it affects them more. I mean, that’s a barrier. That’s a wall between Russia and the UK. And they don’t pay. And why are they not paying? Why is it always the United States that’s paying? And I made that loud and clear. I told that to Mick Mulvaney. I told it to a lot of people. Where’s Mick? Wherever he is. But I told it to a lot of different people. I told it to Mike. I told it to two Mikes. I told it to Steve.

I keep asking the same — I said it to Wilbur Ross. I keep asking the same question: Why is it that the United States is always paying these foreign countries and other foreign countries that, frankly, are much great — much more affected, and they’re not?

So I said, “Hold it up. Let’s get other people to pay.” And then everybody called me: “Oh, please can we pay?” And I said — and there was never any quid pro quo. The letter was beautiful. It was a perfect letter.

It was — unlike Biden, who — by the way, what he said was a horror. And ask how his son made millions of dollars from Ukraine, made millions of dollars from China, even though he had no expertise whatsoever. Okay? So what he did was a real problem. With us, there was no pressure applied, no nothing.

Okay, folks. Thank you very much. Thank you.

END 11:42 A.M. EDT

This entry was posted in Big Government, Brexit, Donald Trump, Economy, President Trump, Secretary Pompeo, Trade Deal, Uncategorized, United Kingdom (UK) and Great Britain, United Nations, USA. Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to UNGA Bilat #6 – President Trump Meets With Prime Minister Johnson of U.K. – Video and Transcript…

  1. Genie says:

    Man, I hope Boris takes up Nigel’s offer to combine forces for a hard Brexit.

    Liked by 12 people

    • M.Allinson says:

      Too late.

      Boris has already rejected Farage’s offer to work together, and Boris believes that “Farage and his donor Arron Banks are ‘not fit and proper persons — they should never be allowed anywhere near government”

      Like

  2. Patience says:

    President Trump was the Host with the most. lol

    Liked by 1 person

  3. mefotobug says:

    Read the whole transcript. Thank you, Sundance, for posting these and keeping us informed! Very, very much appreciated!

    Liked by 2 people

  4. Kaco says:

    Does anyone think the Queen is going to speak up that she wasn’t bamboozled? Or did I miss some kind of evidence in which their Supreme Court based their opinion, as I didn’t see it in the article.

    Liked by 1 person

    • jbrickley says:

      Oh that would be glorious for her Majesty to rip them a new one. That would be something to witness for sure. I don’t know if it will ever happen but wow, that would freakout the Remainers for sure.

      Like

  5. Yy4u says:

    How many times does POTUS have to answer the same question re stopping aid to Ukraine. Our media are SO dumb. Embarrassed for them. Dumber than Democrats. Oh wait…

    Liked by 5 people

  6. Summer says:

    I don’t understand why the Resident keeps talking about “payments to Ukraine.” What exactly are we paying them for? Why does anyone even have to “pay” them at all? Do we owe them something or are they really just a marionette regime set up to act as a barrier to “contain” the Russian Bear?

    Liked by 2 people

    • Summer says:

      President, not resident.

      Like

    • KAR says:

      Yes, marionette regime set up by US-EU-supported coup that threw out Russia-friendly elected President Viktor Yanukovich during Obomba’s reign. The US gave Kiev money then partly because Biden was good buddies with post-coup regime leader and butcher-of-civilians-in-Donbass Petro Poroshenko (AKA Porky), also because the Clintons were in tight ($19M or more in gifts) with Ukraine oligarchs, and because MSM was spreading hysteria that Russian troops had invaded Donbass, formerly known as southern Ukraine. Nope folks. Not one Russian troop there, although there were independent Russian volunteer fighters. Porky’s handlers (I imagine the Roths****ds directly or indirectly) wanted the Russians to LOOK BAD, and convinced the former regime leader it was the RUSSIANS fighting at their border! So Porky began bombing the “front lines” where, sadly, only babushkas lived, too old and poor to move away. And the d**mned Minsk Agreements, partly strong-armed by Putin, prevented the Donbass militias from defending these poor folk, many of whom were killed. Why has Trump given Ukraine money? Trump’s a great President, maybe the best ever. But seems to have a blind spot on Ukraine vs. Donbass. Actually, hardly any politician knows the truth.

      Like

  7. jbrickley says:

    “You know, President Obama used to send pillows and sheets. I sent anti-tank weapons and a lot of things to Ukraine.” — Haha haha brilliant!

    Like

    • KAR says:

      A funny line . . . unless you know what those anti-tank weapons were probably use for. Since no tanks were attacking due to the Minsk agreements, the weapons could only be used to kill front-line babushkas. The situation at the contact line was a tragedy for civilians.

      Like

  8. ann says:

    The EU is grimly determined to retain conquered territory, a.k.a. England, possibly Scotland,

    the Irish May find a bi relish the historical England’s middle & lower.classes struggle with a quasiaristocratic Ruling class . income ruling class oligarchy class for representative governance ruling order English liberation this Irish in conquered territory to EU poor

    Like

  9. KAR says:

    Trump and BoJo make a great pair. Run the world with humor! 😀

    Like

  10. KAR says:

    Technicality: Would it be fair for Germany and France to give money to Ukraine’s war effort against Donbass, given that both of those countries are guarantors of the Minsk Agreements? Maybe conflict of interest.

    Like

  11. ann says:

    The EU is grimly determined to retain conquered territory, a.k.a. England,

    Indeed, why should this be a surprise? Germany, France and even Italy revert back to their pre existing Expansionist Mercantile Ruling Orders
    Model One: repressive, unresponsive state controled by autocratic economically insulated elites
    Model Two: bureaucratic technocracy of socialist state

    Both models fail to protect the liberty of their peoples and provide responsive, peaceful representative governance.

    What they excel in is creating pressure cookers for devolved cultures, depopulation, destabilized radicalization, and ruinous warfare.

    Each model depends on internal control, prolonged economic exploitation of foreign countries and of course, aggressive acquisition and defense of their perceived extra territorial spheres of projected power.

    Scotland, I don’t know.

    the Irish, though, may relish the bitter historical irony of England’s mid-lower class fight for national liberation from the quasiaristocratic Ruling Class .

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s