Despite Warnings Media Steps on a Rake With “Whistleblower” Story – Ukraine Government Initiated Contact – Giuliani Engagement Was Requested by State Dept. Officials…

Well, well, well… the media cannot say President Trump didn’t try to warn them about throwing fake-news rakes in front of their narrative parade – then wondering why they keep getting black-eyes.   Here we go, the details begin to surface.

With more reporting by John Solomon, cited and attributed to on-the-record officials in the State Department and Ukraine, a much more clear picture emerges. In reality, and unfortunately as expected, the fulsome picture is 180° divergent from the media narrative.

The government of Ukraine under both Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, and now President Volodymyr Zelensky, had been trying to deliver information about Obama officials and Democrat party officials (DNC on behalf of Hillary Clinton) requesting the government of Ukraine to interfere in the 2016 election.

Both Poroshenko and Zelensky administrations had tried, unsuccessfully, to get information to current U.S. officials. U.S. State Department officials in Ukraine were refusing to give visa’s to Ukrainian emissaries because they did not want the damaging information sent to the President Trump administration.

Failing to get help from the U.S. State Department, the Ukranians tried a workaround, and hired a respected U.S. lawyer to hand deliver the documentary evidence directly to the U.S. Department of Justice. The contracted American lawyer hand-delivered the information to the U.S. Department of Justice in New York.

However, after delivering the information and not hearing back from the U.S. government, the Ukrainian government, now led by President Zelensky, interpreted the silence as the Trump administration and U.S. government (writ large) being upset about the Ukraine involvement overall. Out of concern for a serious diplomatic breakdown, the Zelensky administration made a personal request to the U.S. State Department for assistance.

The U.S. State Department then reached out to Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani; and asked him if he would meet with Zelensky’s top lawyer, Andrei Yermak.

Rudy Giuliani agreed to act as a diplomatic intermediary and met with Yermak in Spain. After the meeting, Mr. Giuliani then contacted the State Department Officials in charge of Ukraine and Europe and debriefed them on the totality of the subject matter as relayed by Andrei Yermak.

All of this activity preceded the phone call between U.S. President Donald Trump and Ukranian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

President Trump and President Zelensky discussed the issues, and this phone call is the one now referenced by the concerned “whistleblower”. The “whistleblower” obviously had no knowledge of the background and why the subject matter discussed in the phone call was framed as it was.

Apparently in the phone call, President Zelensky was explaining what action the Ukranian government had already taken to try and get the information about corrupt U.S. officials, including former VP Joe Biden, to the U.S. government.

It was from this clarification of information that President Trump is reported to have told Zelensky it was OK to proceed with any internal investigation of corruption in Ukraine that might also encompass former U.S. officials.  Yes, that would include Joe Biden.

From this context we can see how the “whistle-blower”, knowing only half of the information – might incorrectly perceive the conversation. Additionally, there’s a possibility the “whistle-blower” may be ideologically aligned with the same government entities that were trying to block the Ukrainian government from delivering the information in the first place.

Beyond the media, pundits and democrat politicians making fools of themselves, four very significant questions/issues become obvious:

  • (#1) who in the U.S. State Department Ukraine embassy was blocking the visas of Ukrainian officials, and why?
  • (#2) Who was the official at the New York office of the DOJ who took custody of the records hand-delivered by the American lawyer working on behalf of Ukraine?…. and
  • (#3) why were those records never turned over to Main Justice?…. Or
  • (#4) if they were turned over to Main Justice, why didn’t they inform the Trump administration they had received them?

At the end of this fake news narrative parade, these will be the questions that remain.

[Interview Transcript]

Q Mr. President, do you want to address this whistleblower story, sir?

Q Will you be asking — will you be asking —

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Wait a moment, please.

Q Do you want to address this whistleblower story?


Q The whistleblower, whether it was (inaudible)?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: It’s a ridiculous story. It’s a partisan whistleblower. Shouldn’t even have information. I’ve had conversations with many leaders. They’re always appropriate. I think Scott can tell you that. Always appropriate. At the highest level, always appropriate. And anything I do, I fight for this country. I fight so strongly for this country. It’s just another political hack job.

Q Mr. President, on that point, did you discuss Joe Biden, his son, or his family with the leader of Ukraine?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: It doesn’t matter what I discuss. But I will say this: Somebody ought to look into Joe Biden’s statement, because it was disgraceful, where he talked about billions of dollars that he’s not giving to a certain country unless a certain prosecutor is taken off the case.

So, somebody ought to look into that. And you wouldn’t, because he’s a Democrat. And the Fake News doesn’t look into things like that. It’s a disgrace.

But I had a great conversation with numerous people. I don’t even know exactly who you’re talking about, but I had a great conversation with numerous people — numerous leaders. And I always look for the conversation that’s going to help the United States the most. That’s very important.

Q Mr. President, do you know the identity of the whistleblower? Do you know the identity of the whistleblower?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: I don’t know the identity of the whistleblower. I just hear it’s a partisan person, meaning it comes out from another party. But I don’t have any idea. But I can say it was a totally appropriate conversation. It was actually a beautiful conversation.

And this is no different than — you know, the press has had a very bad week with Justice Kavanaugh and all of those ridiculous charges and all of the mistakes made at the New York Times and other places. You’ve had a very bad week. And this will be better than all of them. This is another one. So keep — so keep — so keep playing it up, because you’re going to look really bad when it falls. You know, I guess I’m about — I guess I’m about 22 and 0, and I’ll keep it that way.

Q Did you mention Joe Biden during the conversation though, Mr. President?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: I don’t want to talk about any conversation, other than to say — other than to say: great conversation, totally appropriate conversation, couldn’t have been better. And keep asking questions and build it up as big as possible so you can have a bigger downfall.

Q Mr. President, on the whistleblower, have you read the complaint? Have you read the complaint of the —

PRESIDENT TRUMP: No, I haven’t. It’s — it’s —

Q Who in your White House has?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: I just tell you, it is — everybody has read it and they laugh at it. And it’s another —

Q But you haven’t read it?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: It’s another media disaster. The media has lost so much credibility in this country. Our media has become the laughingstock of the world.

When you look at what they did to Justice Kavanaugh and so many other things last week, I think this is one of the worst weeks in the history of the fake news media. You have been wrong on so many things and this one will be — I wouldn’t say it will top the list, because I think you can’t do worse than some of the stories you missed over the last week or two, but the media of our country is laughed at all over the world now. You’re a joke.

Okay, what else?

Q Mr. President, (inaudible) clarify: When you talk about the conversation that you —

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Which conservation?

Q Well, we’re trying to figure out what conversation you’re —

PRESIDENT TRUMP: Well, figure it out. You’re supposed to be the media. Figure it out.

Q July 25th? Was it July 25th?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: It was — which conversation?

Q Was it July 25th, with the President of Ukraine?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: I really don’t know. I don’t know.

Q Should Congress see the complaint and the transcript of your call to clear any confusion?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: There is nothing. It’s nothing.

Q Should Congress see it?

PRESIDENT TRUMP: There’s nothing.


This entry was posted in AG Bill Barr, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Donald Trump, Election 2016, media bias, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Typical Prog Behavior, Ukraine, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

687 Responses to Despite Warnings Media Steps on a Rake With “Whistleblower” Story – Ukraine Government Initiated Contact – Giuliani Engagement Was Requested by State Dept. Officials…

  1. BitterC says:

    The IC IG, Michael Atkinson’s role in this has puzzled me since he apparently gave the “whistleblower” credibility.

    Before becoming IG, Mike became the Senior Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General – NSD in July 2016. So he served John Carlin, Mary McCord, Dana Boente, until John Demers was appointed in Feb 2018.

    He could very well be a part of the cabal, or at least had some knowledge of the questionable goings on.

    How convenient for the coup plotters to now have him as the IG

    Liked by 18 people

  2. So, are people losing their jobs for this? In the State Dept and DOJ?

    I am now thinking that the reason that talking head Mudd was so upset when he was on CNN is that he knew this idiotic “whistleblower” would blow up the spying ring going on and the resistance to the POTUS…I can’t figure out if the”whistleblower” is an idiot or just a moron. Ditto Nancy Pelosi.

    Liked by 6 people

  3. Bob Parker says:

    This story to me is both stunning AND Frightening at the same time.

    Stunning & Frightening because it exposes much of the depth & extent of the Deep State currently active in the CIA, State Dept AND DOJ.

    If President Trump had ANY doubts about the size/existence of this swamp creature, he now knows that this “Nessie” not only exists but it is MASSIVE & STARVING to get him out of office!!

    At the same time how can We the People not openly wonder:
    How & what is Sec of State Pompeo going to do to immediately start eradicating State of these Swamp creatures in his own massive Dept that are STILL actively working for the Deep State?

    How & what is AG William (Candy?) Barr CURRENTLY DOING to clean out DOJ?? While I concede that maybe, just MAYBE there is some covert action taking place (I pray), with this news now out, I cannot help but wonder if Barr’s actions are too little/too late?

    CIA now seems to be more focused on spying on Preside Trump than doing its job!! Damn it!! the spy who is the whistle blower here SHOULD be identified, brought in to testify to Congress & then promptly arrested/frog-marched with a 1-way ticket to GITMO!!

    This spying/listening in on President Trump’s telephone conversations (surely it did NOT start/stop with the call to Ukraine) is to me nothing short of TREASON!!

    And finally, to the Media, I award them a flaming bag of sh*t flown in directly from San Francisco. Thank you Media for brining this story to light & foolishly trying to make it about President Trump. In your haste/HOT (hatred of Trump)/downright stupidity, you have alerted the world to the ongoings of the Deep State + the shocking suppression of evidence that the Ukraine has been TRYING to bring forward.

    Media;,you are all DDS (Dumber than dog you-know-what).

    Liked by 18 people

  4. emeraldcoaster says:

    Oh how I like seeing Acting DNI Maguire give Schiff-for-brains the middle finger. In the end, this latest non-event will only frustrate the Trump haters. Good!

    Liked by 8 people

    • TrumpPatriot says:

      There was a previous clamor for Schiff to be removed as head of committee for cause. .
      There is video evidence of him lying to Americans as well. There is now this brouhaha.
      Any respect I ever had for Nancy Pelosi as a politician or leader is gone. She needs to resign. She has placed incompetent partisans in important leadership positions who are NOT guarding the interests of America or Americans. What a mess! !

      Liked by 3 people

      • flyboy46 says:

        Do you seriously expect Nancy Pelousey to guard the best interests of Americans?

        Liked by 2 people

        • Zorro says:

          Exactly. Pelosi is the most corrupt SofH in US history.

          Liked by 2 people

        • jebg46 says:

          Especially because Pelosi changed House Rules to completely focus on the executive, mainly the President. All the investigations are kabuki theater that she pretends aren’t serious but she wrote the new rules.


          • jebg46 says:

            P.S. the Republicans need to broadcast the Pelosi House Rules to prove they had no intention of working for the American people. They want to destroy the USA, our great economy that will send millions into poverty, just to regain control. Despicable.


  5. The Gipper Lives says:

    Wow–the President took the bark off of the Professional Liars! I love it.

    I still think this is a Deep State bank shot by Barry to take out Joe in the primaries. The Obamas want Kam ‘n Corey, not the humiliation of a Biden loss. This is not to protect Joe–it’s to get rid of Joe. Just look at it; it’s not hurting the President at all, The only one getting damaged is Biden.

    Liked by 10 people

    • Pale rider says:

      Biden has been hurting himself from his inception, he’s a moron.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Tl Howard says:

      That was my first thought, but there’s a risk to Obama as well so it doesn’t make sense.
      Harris, Obama must know by now, is done. She has shown no ability to endear herself to anyone.
      Spartacus is the butt of jokes across the nation.

      Liked by 4 people

    • doofusdawg says:

      I look for Iran to take another aggressive military action that Trump cannot let pass. POTUS responds militarily and then the media comes back in on cue pushing the story that Trump is starting a war in order to deflect attention from his latest political scandal. This is all orchestrated by the deep state and they have a plan all the way up to the election.

      Trump needs to be clear and precise.

      Liked by 1 person

    • L4grasshopper says:

      Agree. Damage to Trump was always a “nice to have” bonus if it occurred.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Dee Paul Deje says:

      Liked by 1 person

    • YeahYouRight says:

      It is providing another avenue for more corrupt congressional investigations.

      I don’t see how O cares who runs. This is a throwaway candidate where Trump will most likely be re-elected. Biden could be an Obama third term.


    • evergreen says:

      No, don’t think it’s obama trying to push Biden out. All that would take is a conversation and a withdrawal due to medical reasons.

      Publicly destroying your own party’s front runner contaminates the party. Not likely a DNC inside job.

      I’ve maintained that Biden is the ice breaker for Clinton to secure the nomination. Biden wins the public polls based on institutional name recognition, then the primaries, then goes to the convention and selects Clinton as VP. The rematch then goes the distance, hoping they win so that Biden can exit with a medical discharge. Hillary then owns the joint, and all the players are doled out their patronage.


  6. Cathy M. says:

    A previous Solomon article for Background-

    “How the Obama White House engaged Ukraine to give Russia collusion narrative an early boost
    BY JOHN SOLOMON — 04/25/19 07:00 PM EDT”

    Liked by 6 people

  7. WeThePeople2016 says:

    Liked by 13 people

  8. thedoc00 says:

    Thanks SD for the article. My comments on the matter regarding the previous requests by the Ukrainian Government, Rudi’s visit, the phone call and trail of the information sent by the Ukrainian was missing details I had not seen.

    “The contracted American lawyer hand-delivered the information to the U.S. Department of Justice in New York.” This can be narrowed down for us here at CTH, which NY DoJ office received the information?? Gee .. wonder if it was SDNY. AG Barr now has just cause to clean out at least 1 of the DoJ offices in NY, if he has the inclination to do so.

    Liked by 3 people

  9. dwpender says:

    Let’s see how Maria Bartiromo handles this story tomorrow. I’ll bet she’ll be on the right track.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Niagara Frontier says:

      In the meantime, the WP is doubling-down with its latest attention grabbing headline (50 minutes ago): “How Trump and Giuliani pressured Ukraine to investigate the president’s rivals”.

      Of course, the WP knows that through syndication agreements, its headline and attached smear article will be repeated ad nauseum by traditional new outlets and online news services around the world.


    • oldersoul says:

      She has had weak guests the last few weeks. Her bookers may be compromised by now. It’s a shame that OAN couldn’t afford her when she re-upped with Fox.

      But if she has on Rudy tomorrow, then she is honed in on it.


    • 🍺Gunny66 says:

      I’d bet Maria is all over this also, that is if she wants to be invited to anymore State Dinners….😎


  10. FPCHmom says:

    Amazing tweet.

    Liked by 12 people

  11. Eric says:

    PDJT and Giuliani are working with Ukraine to investigate criminal acts (coup/conspirators against the U.S.).

    Multiply PDJT and Giuliani working with Ukraine X’s 1000 = what PDJT is doing secretly in planning the prosecutions of all criminals involved in this coup (Conspiracy).

    PDJT is 100% responsible and has a duty to ensure everyone involved in this coup/conspiracy to remake the United States to become a 3rd world country by eliminating the Rule of Law to destroy the U.S. Constitution. The Globalist Constitution would replace the U.S. Constitution.

    The Chamber of Commerce, Business Round Table, Rinos, Democrats, Media, upper management of the FBI/DOJ etc. has allegedly betrayed the American people, their oath of office and the U.S. for their own personal gain by joining the Globalist.

    Multiply these now known facts show to the America People by PDJT times 1,000; is what We the People do not see and would be horrified if the People actually knew what can happen to 99% of the American People if PDJT wasn’t the President and going to prosecute everyone involve in the Coup/Conspiracy.

    This is a Legal Civil War and the loser will disappear forever.

    PDJT has strategically for 3-years set the perfect stage for voluminous prosecutions.

    PDJT has strategically altered his plan (delayed) for Justice since Nov. 2016 (like any war), for the benefit of building many solid criminal cases allowing for everyone involved in the coup (Conspiracy) to destroy themselves by adding to the mountains of paper/digital and conflicting statements for easy prosecutions.

    The pouring out of criminal acts has been revealed for the past 3 years and now the criminal acts evidence are starting to pour out daily. All this did not happen by accident; that would be like the Universe and Earth just happened by accident.

    PDJT will implement his 3-years plan and prosecute everyone involved in this coup and conspiracy, thus saving himself, his family, the Rule of Law, Constitutions and the American People.

    Liked by 9 people

    • Janice says:

      You are 100% correct. Following P/T during his many business battles, how he works/thinks strategically, how he plays multi-dimensional chess in strategies and P/T “Acknowledgment” (most important hint) of criminals acts for over 3-years; locks in and guarantees criminals prosecutions.


  12. DesertRain says:

    Nothing organic about the Ukraine/Rudy/Whistleblower saga.

    August 2019. NY Times piece on Rudy pressing Ukraine on investigation.

    Plus additional spin from NBC.

    Adam Schiff et al put on a “full court press” strategy to keep Sue Gordon in an ODNI role.
    Good chance Gordon would have pushed the whistleblower report through the process, right? Plan A… But Sue got canned.

    We are watching Plan B play out….

    Liked by 1 person

  13. WeThePeople2016 says:

    Liked by 4 people

  14. MFM says:

    Drudge has certainly entered the sewer, not even worth a click..Still lead headline, worse than TMZ..

    Liked by 2 people

    • Dee Paul Deje says:

      I dumped Drudge about 2 years ago after clicking daily for 10+ years. WTH happened? Now I use

      Liked by 1 person

      • Lack is not all says:

        I did it too. Not even near Drudge. I wonder what is Drudge’s secret that he had to convert into non government maximum swamp . I am just curious.


      • Lady Sid says:

        Good question — what happened to Drudge? I force myself to go there about every 3 wks. to see if I missed something. Usually disappointed.


        • I think the Deep State got to Drudge. If the Deep State spies on all conservatives to obtain blackmail material, they would definitely want to target those in the conservative media. The only question is, what do they have on Drudge to make him pull a Napolitano?


    • sentinelle says:

      I agree. Used to visit Drudge daily until it became obviously ‘never trumper’ land. I also didn’t like finding myself clicking links I was attracted to and finding myself using up the free monthly articles at the New York Times without intending to do that. Eventually, I came to realize they must have some agreement with the NYT and rarely visit the site.


  15. mylabs5 says:

    I don’t know if anyone noted this but John Kerry’s son is involved with Hunter Biden on the Ukrainian deal. Jessica Tarlov, the Dem strategist and apologist with the nails on the chalkboard scratching voice who is clueless most of the time) let it out on Cavuto this morning. I don’t think she realizes what she did (with Kerry’s DoS under scrutiny for corruption and him with openly breaking the Logan Act) by exposing Kerry’s son as a co-conspirator. Remember that Kerry (with his side kick McCain) did the same thing during the effort to normalize relations post war with Viet Nam getting his family investments with CBRE primary position commercial real estate deals. Read more of his treachery:

    Looks like the apples didn’t fall far from the tree.

    Liked by 7 people

  16. DAVE CRAIN says:

    Meanwhile, Globalist sympathizer Neil Cavuto on his Fox show this morning continued to spread the fear mongering that VSGPDJT may have overstepped his bounds. Once a putz, always a putz.

    Liked by 1 person

  17. The Gadfly says:

    After speaking to a well placed DNC insider I’ve come to realize that its a group of Never-Biden, pro Warren Dems that have trolled everyone.

    This was originally a 2015 Clinton attack on Biden to stay out of the race printed in the NYT one small article.

    Proof? Many MSM outlets are all over Biden, playing the famous clip of him admitting his crimes. Thats simply not what they do without an agenda.

    They ginned up the whistle-blower anti-Trump story knowing it all leads to a Biden take down. Watch and see.


    • Dee Paul Deje says:

      Wouldn’t it have been easier to whisper to Biden what would happen if he didn’t get out of the way? He’s not the only Dem that will be going down for this.


    • Tl Howard says:

      It’s really not to POTUS’ advantage for Warren to have the field to herself between now and the end of the primary season. I suspected the pro-Warren, anti-Biden faction because Trump would have wanted to spring all this Biden corruption stuff should Biden have gotten the nomination.

      As it is, as POTUS has already said, he pulled the Fauxcahontas meme too soon.


    • Pokey says:

      This sounds like Dem politics as usual. I am not sure this is what is going on, but I definitely believe this is what could be going on. I don’t trust Warren or any of her Comrades to do any differently, but I do think they would wait longer to try this even on a semi-Comrade like Biden. I would wait to see if Biden self destructs before I would alienate his supporters. That is, if I was a tool of the Communists, like Elizabeth Warren seems to be.


  18. WeThePeople2016 says:


    Liked by 4 people

  19. teapartyson AdamJefferson says:

    Sundance Well Done once again. You had worried me in an earlier post that you seemed to think that GEOTUS might stumble into their trap but I had told my wife, You watch this will boomerang and it is the ONLY reason GEOTUS is commenting on it. You phrased it perfectly once again…Thank You


  20. Magabear says:

    The fake news media only cares that they get the first punch in against PDJT even though they get pummeled afterwards, for the the only punch that many people ever see is the first one. The fake news got numerous days of breathless headlines out of this fake story, so in their minds this is mission accomplished.

    Now that the truth is coming out, the fake news will muddy up the story so that the low information voters will be left thinking that there might be something to the fake story. This is the whole intention of the fake story to begin with. Besides, they can always revert back to calling people racists once this latest fake news cycle runs its course.

    Liked by 2 people

  21. Hal_S says:

    Short Version-
    Pro-Clinton holdovers in the Dept. of State obstructed justice to prevent the reformist Ukraine Government from providing evidence to the Mueller investigation about actual Clinton-Russian actions to interfere in the 2016 elections.

    When the reformist Ukraine Government DID provide the information, Pro-Clinton holdovers in the NY DOJ obstructed justice and hid the evidence of Clinton-Russian conspiracy so it wouldn’t reach the Mueller investigation.

    Pro-Clinton holdovers in the NSA were spying on the President; when they overheard that DOS and DOJ obstruction of justice was about to reach the President.
    They filed a whistleblower complaint and leaked this information, likely to Schiff

    This may explain “imminent concern”:
    In situations where the whistleblower faces discipline, the leak is upgraded to “Imminent Concern”. Issues of “imminent concern” are reported to Congressional oversight. So, if you illegally leak information to Democrats and THEN claim to be a whistleblower, you can invoke “imminent concern” to legally get that information over to Congressional Democrats.

    Here, by denying the “imminent concern” route, Trump has set up a mole-hunt-
    Imagine a Congressional Democrats who is now stuck with felony-level-leaked-classified material, and no way to ret-con how they got the material.

    No wonder Shiff is pushing so hard for this – the longer it sits, the more time to track down the illegal dissemination of classified information.

    Liked by 3 people

  22. 4gypsybreeze says:

    I look at all of this as a possible 2 maybe 3 birds with one shot.
    Get Biden.
    Press even more disgraced
    Show corruption at DOJ and DNC

    But wait–could there be more?
    Ukraine sent the info and it was intercepted. What other countries did the DNC attempt to have them interfere in our election? Itay? UK? New Zealand? Australia? We are pretty sure about the five eyes here at CTH…but does the rest of our country know about their possible involvement?
    That is why the….but wait…there is more comment. Reminds me of commercials…

    Could this be a way of “pulling a thread” and letting the media do the story they SHOULD be doing?
    I also noted his comments on the –stories they missed–when watching the press briefing. Thought that was interesting. When the DNC was actually asking other countries to meddle in our election and yet they have played the Russia…Russia…Russia card for so long? Yeah we Treepers know…but what a way to wake up some more people in the country!

    Terrible when our President has to goad the press to do their job …he hands them the stories and they still do not do their job…sad.

    Loved the stepping on the rake Sundance. Made my morning~

    P.S. and makes me wonder…why Russia as their main scapegoat? Did Putin say no to them when they approached him to interfere, and he being the KGB he is, was smart enough to get evidence? And how many other countries have stepped up and said the same as Ukraine? Oh my…the possibilities are endless……Ah….can only imagine what our President Trump knows!

    Just enjoying the heck out of “the ride” !

    Liked by 1 person

    • very likely VVP told NO to Clinton ppl since he did not like how communism/socialism destroyed Russia and he warn Hussein O about his policies….


    • Louisiana Tea Rose says:

      Gives a enhanced meaning to the term “useful idiots”.


    • Ellis says:

      Kind of my thought right now. Trump was grinning and telling media to dig deeper into whistle blower story yesterday. Now we hear the whistle blower was merely hearsay and there was no quid pro quo.

      How do you get the activist press to cover the spying scandal? You bait them into a gotcha story then leak the actual facts. What do you bet some more facts about spygate come to light next week as the media is now obligated to cover this story.


  23. donnyvee says:

    Because I was (wasting my time) debating a leftist on another site, I wanted to reference the Biden video where he is clearly bragging about having gotten Ukrainian prosecutor fired. Searching under “Biden pressures Ukraine” I never did find it and the only non-Trump is a traitor item that showed up was from John Solomon and the Hill.


  24. joebkonobi says:

    As much as I despise special counsels, I think it is now time for Barr to appoint one to investigate a conspiracy with Ukraine to interfere in the 2016 election.

    Seems to me an opportunity to turn the narrative from PDJT to the Obama admin, Clinton, and the Democrat Party.

    DOJ cannot investigate as they were involved which represents a conflict of interest, among other obvious reasons.

    This is the opportunity to take away the “election interference” narrative from the Democrats and put where it belongs, on the Democrats and Obama admin.

    Will Barr & the Republicans step up to the plate?


  25. WeThePeople2016 says:

    Liked by 2 people

  26. Pokey says:

    When will the Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton bull crap ever end? Thing to do is just know there will be a lot more of it hitting the walls, but when will fly season be over?


  27. JoAnn Leichliter says:

    I do not hate to say, “I told you so.”


  28. 335blues says:

    So where is the whistleblower
    for the whistleblower?
    It feels like forever since Barr came on the
    scene ostensibly to bring the coup
    perpetrators to justice.
    So why dies it feel like the
    attempted coup is still ongoing?


    • Judith says:

      I’m glad that the TREASONOUS COUP is ongoing. The statute of limitations does not start ticking until they stop committing crimes. So by all means keep it going, until we get all the judges we need to convict and hang every last TRAITOR.


  29. WeThePeople2016 says:


    • WeThePeople2016 says:


  30. WeThePeople2016 says:


  31. meadowlarkspring says:

    The whistleblower is perhaps taking Sue Gordon’s culture of sharing a little too literally… “And it’s sharing it openly and being involved in the conversations.”. I don’t think a way to build trust with the American people is for the spy agencies to be involved in presidential conversations.

    Why didn’t the intelligence community brief Trump in early 2016 about counterintelligence threats then, hmmm? They are so political. They have been acting like a fourth branch of government for awhile.

    The challenge (and benefit) to a more open intelligence community
    By: Nathan Strout
    July 23


    Another example was the release of an unclassified report on Russian election interference, said Gordon.

    “I’m proud of the intelligence community assessment on the 2016 election that was published unclassified. That was a huge leap,” she said. “What it did was, it shared information. And we are doing great things with the private sector to talk about counterintelligence threats. And it’s with no ask. It’s just sharing it. And it’s sharing it openly and being involved in the conversations. So I think our conversation with the American people is really helping the trust.”



  32. jx says:

    Liked by 1 person

  33. Mac says:

    Timelines are important to understanding most of these incidents. In this case, the “whistle blowing” began several months ago, when the stories of Biden’s son’s possible use of his father’s position as VP for personal gain were reintroduced. The “Biden blackmailing the Ukraine to stop investigation of his son” story could be devastating to Biden’s campaign. The “whistle blowing” was probably seen as a way to undermine the credibility of that story, by making it look as though it was fabricated at Trump’s insistence. It was another insurance policy. As the Biden Blackmail story has seemingly dropped off the radar, there was no reason to release this whistle blower report now, In fact, it is counterproductive for the Biden campaign. So, what happened?

    Two very important things have happened recently. The first is that the Biden campaign appears to be tanking. Joe is rapidly losing appeal as President, or even a Presidential candidate. So, he is now expendable in the Get Trump universe. The second thing is that the impeach Trump movement has experienced significant and serious setbacks. It has failed to gain ANY traction in
    Congress, at all. Nadler is a joke. And Cummings is coming up dry in his committee. So, in desperation the “Get Trump” movement tries to feed this “whistle blower” BS to the House to use as a club against the administration. In the end, it will only end up hurting Joe Biden. But, the Establishment wrote him off several weeks ago, as proven by the “You don’t have to do this, Joe,” Obama leak. Now, in a more Machiavellian vein, this could also be a way for the Establishment to force Biden out of the race. It gets complicated on the other side of the looking glass.

    Now, the most interesting thing about this story is that the current administration is sitting on the info. Remember, this will ultimately only reflect badly on Biden, no one else. So, the question then becomes is that action a way to protect Biden, personally? Is it a means of allowing Biden to stay in the race as an eventual disruptor? Is it being held in reserve for later use, should Biden become the nominee? Or is it simply Trump being his usual pragmatic, non-ideological self? A lot to think about here.


    • thedoc00 says:

      Actually, the move by the US Embassy predates the breaking story about the Biden Family. I suspect the Ukrainian Administration, then governing the Ukraine, tried to either buy President Trump’s support or it was a 2-for operation whereby Joe Biden gets ratted out and the President is caught “buying” information to influence elections after the Embassy leaks the story.

      Saint Obama and Ms. Hillary are at risk in this whole story.

      Do not discount the unrealizable US Embassy staff in the Ukraine as being part of the “whistleblower” story.


  34. Kleen says:

    Hey Joe Biden, can you tell us why you wanted that prosecutor fired?


    • jx says:

      Clinton and the Democrats invested a great deal of their time and our money into getting their people installed in Ukraine. They’re not going to willingly walk away from it.

      • Feb 4, 2014 – Nuland’s infamous call wherein she designated Yatsenyuk next president of Ukraine and said Biden would go to Ukraine to endorse
      • February 22, 2014 – President Yanukovych deposed
      • February 27, 2014 – Yatsenyuk installed
      • April 2014, 2014 – Biden visits Ukraine and pledges to Yatsenyuk $50M in aid for Ukraine
      • May 2014, 2014 – Hunter Biden appointed to Burisma board, along with his Rosemont Seneca co-founding partner Devon Archer


    • “Well, uh.. I’m tellin’ you now that he was a BAD DUDE. The prosecutor was a-waitin’ out by my car with a rusty razor blade and I was, like, Hey man, You need to fire that prosecutor or you’ll never see the billion dollars. And Son-of-a-Bitch! He was fired.”

      Liked by 1 person

    • Lester Smith says:

      Trump and Ukraine president need to have a joint news conference. Trump should ask if Ukraine is OK with releasing transcripts and have them on hand at the press conference. Doing it this way Trump would retain presidential confidance with other world leaders that conversations will remain confidential. Give the dems what they really don’t want, call their bluff.


  35. thedoc00 says:

    Rudi may be listed as a member of the President’s legal team but in reality he has turned out to be a pretty good agent provocateur.


  36. Zorro says:

    How much of the Russia Hoax/Spygate does Uncle Joe really know? It seems that there is high risk with Uncle Joe as the Demosocialist candidate and the hoax is exposed and he was Obamboozler’s VP. Why would he even run unless he was kept in the dark?


    • Annie says:

      they may have kept him in he dark about a lot of things..great merciful Zeus..with his brain damage..he could..blab anything and everything…


  37. SnapperCheeks says:

    So haul Biden’s sons’ ass in for questioning like they did DJTjr…js

    Liked by 2 people

    • Lester Smith says:

      Senate committee would have to grow a set to have Bidens kid in. Also wasn’t Bidens son addicted to drugs. Could Ukraine of used his sons addiction to their advantage.


      • Lester Smith says:

        Follow up on my last post. If Ukraine presedent not given a visa. Trump could still have a teleconference with him. Have press their in real time. He More than one way to skin a cat. With today’s technology a person does not have to be physically present to have a news conference. I’m disabled and use teleconferences all the time. Watch dems crap their pants. do it president trump let the light of truth expose the lies.


  38. islandpalmtrees says:

    Want to start cleaning this up? Well Sundance, has told us were to start!

    The United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (sometimes referred to as the Intelligence Committee or SSCI) is dedicated to overseeing the United States Intelligence Community—the agencies and bureaus of the federal government of the United States who provide information and analysis for leaders of the executive and legislative branches. The Committee was established in 1976 by the 94th Congress.

    What to do: eliminate these people

    How to do it: ? Vote them out of office

    Who are they: Read On


  39. tom says:

    It would be very interesting to know who, at the U.S. Department of Justice in New York, decided to squelch the information from the Ukraine government. It would also be very interesting to know who were the U.S. State Department officials in Ukraine who refused to allow the Ukrainians a visa to travel to the US. All of these parties are complicit in conspiracy to obstruct justice.

    Liked by 2 people

    • islandpalmtrees says:

      And, what about the missing memo from U.K., reportedly delivered to Flynn’s team in early January of 2017? Admitting that the Steele Dossier was not to be believed.

      The point is, we still have allot of cover-up going on. And, no-one being prosecuted as a result.


  40. meadowlarkspring says:

    “Apparently in the phone call, President Zelensky was explaining what action the Ukranian government had already taken to try and get the information about corrupt U.S. officials, including former VP Joe Biden, to the U.S. government.”

    From a 2-and-a-half-year-old article in Politico — “Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire/Kiev officials are scrambling to make amends with the president-elect after quietly working to boost Clinton” — which was linked to last night by Instapundit.

    Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire
    Kiev officials are scrambling to make amends with the president-elect after quietly working to boost Clinton.
    By KENNETH P. VOGEL and DAVID STERN 01/11/2017


    Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country.

    Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found.



    Manafort’s work for Yanukovych caught the attention of a veteran Democratic operative named Alexandra Chalupa, who had worked in the White House Office of Public Liaison during the Clinton administration. Chalupa went on to work as a staffer, then as a consultant, for Democratic National Committee. The DNC paid her $412,000 from 2004 to June 2016, according to Federal Election Commission records, though she also was paid by other clients during that time, including Democratic campaigns and the DNC’s arm for engaging expatriate Democrats around the world.



    In the email, which was sent in early May to then-DNC communications director Luis Miranda, Chalupa noted that she had extended an invitation to the Library of Congress forum to veteran Washington investigative reporter Michael Isikoff. Two days before the event, he had published a story for Yahoo News revealing the unraveling of a $26 million deal between Manafort and a Russian oligarch related to a telecommunications venture in Ukraine. And Chalupa wrote in the email she’d been “working with for the past few weeks” with Isikoff “and connected him to the Ukrainians” at the event.

    Isikoff, who accompanied Chalupa to a reception at the Ukrainian Embassy immediately after the Library of Congress event, declined to comment.



    • meadowlarkspring says:

      Exclusive: Suspected Russian hack of DNC widens — includes personal email of staffer researching Manafort
      Michael Isikoff
      Chief Investigative Correspondent
      July 25, 2016


      • meadowlarkspring says:

        If the FBI had not relied on what the DNC wanted to share and Crowdstrike’s analysis, they wouldn’t have had to rely on Wikileaks releasing the hacked emails to investigate the hack. In my opinion, they could not establish an investigation that was credible at that late date. Too little…too late. Too political.

        The Alexandra Chalupa Interview
        JUNE 5, 2019


        And so when it happened, Isikoff was like, “Oh my gosh.” He called me, and I said, “Yes, and did you see the email that mentions the two of us?” Because it says in the email that I invited Michael Isikoff to this Library Congress event to meet with these Ukrainian-American journalists. I directed him to the emails, and then I said, “Look at the attachment.” The attachment was basically exactly that, the state-sponsored. And he ran this story, because he called Yahoo and he confirmed that was a very serious hacking attempt that’s reserved for only certain high-level intrusions that are very scary. It’s a very scary type of threat on your email. So he ran the story, and then the FBI responded about an hour later and said that they were now investigating and realize that this breach may have gone to more than just the committee’s, but your personal accounts. A few weeks later, I believe it was the New York Times broke the story that it was about a hundred political operatives that had been targeted with their emails like this with state-sponsored attacks, and that included Podesta.



      • beachbum31 says:

        Michael Isikoff
        Chief Investigative Coconspirator


  41. nimrodman says:

    well – he’s not stepping on a rake, but this is next-best

    Liked by 1 person

  42. Kay Sadeeya says:

    Now it’s all starting to make sense; when a couple of years ago the accusations were flying against some “Russian” NGOs who were said to be “colluding”. But when they (the Russians) said they would would come and testify, the Deep-State went into crises mode. So the Democrats quickly recanted their accusations and tried to hush the specifics. The four-flushing Democrat’s bluff was called and they have been in a panic ever since.

    Trump 2020
    Lewandowski 2024


    • Kay Sadeeya says:

      That’s sort of how I remember it. Some of the details might be fuzzy, but I remember there was an offer by the Russians to come and testify. Could this be part of their trying to tell the American people their side of the story?


  43. Freepetta says:

    The fake media can’t get enough bull 💩 about the excellent policy our President has. It’s simple “America First”
    They are freaking out because they can’t protect their corrupt and perverse boy Joey Biden and his drug addicted failure son Hunter who married his sister in law as soon as his brother (another winner) died. What a disgusting, disgraceful and immoral family.


  44. BSR says:

    The media should know that jumping on rakes are best left to the pro’s.


  45. ChampagneReady says:

    I’ve been saying it for months now Mike Pompeo is not on top of anything. Even more, he’s working to sabotage Judicial Watch just as much as the State Department rats in the Obama administration for the records they seek on Clinton and have to go to court to order them to be turned over.

    There’s somthing MIGHTY fishy about that.

    Liked by 1 person

  46. thedoc00 says:

    Keep in mind as all this is transpiring. The only People President Trump can fire, without cause are those he appoints. All the (caugh caugh) “professional staff” have a long drawn out process protecting them from summary dismissal and/or replacement.

    So, now its a choice between the President and those who support him moving forward and remove evil doers as they are identified or close down the agency to clean house 1 position at a time (which means NO work gets done and nothing moves forward). AG Barr and the Secretaries as well as other appointees within each cabinet department live with this dilemma each day. So, keep this major mitigating circumstance in mind as you criticize Executive Branch leaders.

    Is it frustrating? Yes it is and the natural tendency is blame leadership. Yet, in the case of the government, the “leadership” has to deal with and function with the hand they are dealt on day 1.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Beau Geste says:

      Most, if not all of the “resistance” have been appointed by obama to the “Senior Executive Service”, which is protected from termination. So, the “resistance” is self-identified, and “concentrated” in the SES. Transfer all the “SES” agency employees to newly-rented “headquarters” in Gary Indiana. It is only, say, 4,000 people, total. They keep all their pay and “benefits”. They get moving expenses. Transfer FBI chief Wray there, too, to protect them. Gary, Indiana needs the income influx, which would be great for this downtrodden city devastated by the loss of steel-mill and manufacturing jobs. And, the transferred SES employees will have a chance to learn firsthand, what their government policies have done to cities like Gary, Indiana.

      Assign all the SES employees to use their protected “extreme government expertise” to write memos, to make recommendations to improve their Agency. This is a 2-year assignment. Their reports are due in 2 years, at which time, the reports will be reviewed by outside “Czars”.

      The transferred SES employees will have full telephone facilities, so non-SES employees remaining in place at the Agencies can call them to ask questions, (to get the benefit of their great expertise….). In the meantime, have all the remaining Agency employees (who likely do all the actual non-political work of the Agencies anyway) carry on, as PDJT and his Cabinet direct them.


  47. Annie says:

    I remember all the times I have heard Biden telling everyone within earshot ..that he was the poorest member of Congress!! I thought the first time, I heard that..then either you are lying your socks off or are the dumbest member of Congress!!!

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s