Details Behind Patrick Byrne Allegations of FBI “Political Espionage”…

Former CEO Patrick Byrne has given four primary interviews where he outlines his knowledge of a 2015 and 2016 political espionage operation being run by the FBI.

Fox News, MacCallumFox Business #1Fox Business #2CNN, Cuomo

After a review of the interviews, and extracting specific points therein, here’s an overview.

The substance of Mr. Byrne claims does seem to align with what we already know about the DOJ and FBI activity during the 2016 election cycle, including the FBI operations.

First, Patrick Byrne claims he has spoken to the DOJ on April 5th, 2019, and again on April 30th, 2019.  Mr. Byrne states he told the DOJ all of the information he was aware of during those two interviews covering approximately seven hours of questioning.

The current public statements Mr. Byrne is making are not with the approval of the DOJ or any investigators therein.  His decision to go public with this information comes as a result of conversations with a life-long mentor and confidant, Warren Buffett.  Mr. Byrne states he has known Warren Buffett since Byrne was a teenager and Mr. Buffett was in his mid-forties.

According to his CNN interview Byrne talked to Buffett in June of 2019 about how he could be a witness in the DOJ investigation authorized by Attorney General Bill Barr and being conducted by U.S. Attorney John Durham.  After listening to the details, Buffett recommended Mr. Byrne go public with the story.

However, in order to go public Byrne would need to separate himself from his role as CEO of Overstock, the company Byrne founded.  Mr. Byrne resigned yesterday, August 22nd.

Byrne explains he told Buffett about his April conversations with the DOJ and Buffett said it didn’t matter… Byrne still needed to go public with the story. It sounds like there are several motives for going public; perhaps one is personal safety.

To verify his April DOJ discussion, Byrne points to two references:

♦First, the movement of Maria Butina from harsh isolation in prison on May 9th, ten days after he delivered his testimony to the DOJ.  According to Byrne Ms. Butina was moved to a very different White Collar facility based on his information.

♦The second reference point Byrne highlights is the May 13th DOJ appointment of John Durham to look into the origination of the Russia investigation events. Byrne says this too was a direct result of his two DOJ sessions April 5th and 30th.

If Byrne is accurate; and if his claims of him personally being an operative of the FBI with instructions to engage Ms. Butina inside the political espionage events structured by corrupt FBI officials are genuine; it would appear Special Counsel Robert Mueller facilitated throwing a bag over Ms Butina in an effort to keep the corrupt FBI intelligence operation hidden from the public. This would explain the Mueller demand for strict solitary isolation and confinement.  [The reports are indeed troubling]

Again, if Byrne is correct, it would appear that extremely significant and exculpatory Brady material -evidence that could easily prove an entrapment defense- was intentionally withheld from Ms. Butina’s defense team.   Alarmingly this points to ongoing corrupt officials that still remain inside the current DOJ.  Ms. Butina was collateral damage.


A review of the time-frame details provided by Patrick Byrne in the four interviews shows his story told four times is consistent each time.

Fox News, MacCallumFox Business #1Fox Business #2CNN, Cuomo

Here’s a brief review of the consistencies aspect:

After a cursory meeting in/around July 2015, Byrne claims in the period of September to December 2015 he reported contact with Russian national Ms. Maria Butina to the FBI as a precaution related to his security clearance.

Byrne claims he was asked to participate in an FBI intelligence operation and to introduce, and/or facilitate the introduction of, Ms. Butina to the campaigns of Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz and Donald Trump.

In December of 2015 Mr. Byrne became suspicious of the FBI motives because he warned FBI officials of a potential that his efforts, his reputation and those who trust him, may result in Butina gaining entry into campaign confidences.  The FBI agents told Byrne that was exactly the intent; people high up in the FBI wanted Ms. Butina to gain deep access into the Trump campaign.  Mr. Byrne became suspicious of a corrupt political motive, but didn’t say anything at the time.

Additionally Byrne’s assistance was requested for an investigation of a high-level government official, he later named as Hillary Clinton.

[Sidebar: It’s noteworthy that during these FBI engagements Byrne was never requested to facilitate Ms. Butina into the Bernie Sanders campaign.  The inference in that omission is the Dem primary was rigged, and the riggers saw no value wasting time on Bernie]

In/around Feb or March 2016 Byrne was told to focus Ms. Butina’s attention to the campaign of Donald Trump and to diminish any attention toward Rubio or Cruz.

The assistance of the investigation of the federal official (Hillary Clinton) ended in late June and early July of 2016.  Immediately thereafter Ms. Clinton was publicly -and unusually- cleared by FBI Director James Comey on July 5th, 2016.

In/around this same June & July time-frame (2016), FBI agents requested Mr. Byrne to focus on developing a closer romantic relationship with Ms. Butina and to use his influence to target her to closer proximity with the Trump family and Trump campaign.

It was within these June and July 2016 engagements where FBI agents were apologetic about the requests and specifically mentioned their instructions were coming from three principle FBI officials Byrne described as “X, Y and Z”.   Later Byrne identified FBI Director James Comey as “Z”.

In the Fox MacCallum interview Byrne named James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Bill Priestap, John Carlin (DOJ-NSD) and Peter Strzok.   Mr. Byrne said the specific instructions were coming to the agents from Special Agent Peter Strzok as he relayed the requests of those above him [X, Y and Z (Comey)].

This FBI contact structure highlights an arms-length operation; perhaps intentionally constructed to create plausible deniability for those above the directly instructing agents.

In essence, these rank-and-file FBI agents were asking Patrick Byrne to be a civilian handler of a Russian national, and instructing him to carry out a covert counterintelligence operation.  The FBI agents were apologetic about asking a civilian to take on such a role.

♦ Ms. Maria Butina (pictured left) is described as a young Russian idealist, who had strong connections to high powered Russian oligarchs.

The purpose of Butina coming to the U.S., as explained by Byrne, was for her to engage with influential Americans for contacts that could provide geopolitical value to the oligarchs.

Patrick Byrne was seen as important to Ms. Butina due to his connections to the emerging financial structures of crypto-currency and block-chain.  Byrne is a libertarian who believes in small government, and is somewhat of a disruptor in the business world. Ms. Butina wanted to introduce Byrne to her friends in Russia.

While it was not outlined in any of the four interviews, alternative currency options to the U.S. dollar have been an ongoing effort of Russian interests for a while.  Russia considers global trade attached to the dollar as geopolitical problem; and they have been working for years on alternative currencies for trade (and their own wealth) that can avoid U.S. sanctions and the reach of the U.S. treasury.

♦ As a Russian national with specific Russian interests that are not in alignment with U.S. national interests, Maria Butina would be defined by the U.S. intelligence community as an ‘agent of a foreign power’.   Her status would mean unrestricted monitoring by the U.S. intelligence community would be entirely legal.

However, because of this ‘foreign agent’ status Ms. Butina could also be valuable as a virus to infect anyone the U.S. intelligence apparatus would wish to target domestically.  This motive appears to be the reason for the FBI to tell Mr. Byrne where to send Ms. Butina.

Conducting FISA-702(16)(17) database searches and surveillance on U.S. persons who would meet with Butina would be justifiable and legal.

Extended contact with any U.S. person could likely lead to a Title-1 surveillance warrant through the FISA court.  However, even without the warrant, 702 searches would be valid just from brief contact.

As we have shown FISA-702(“16” to-from) and (“17” about) queries were off the charts during the time-frame of November 2015 through May 2016.  Per the FISA audit conducted by NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers, after the flags noted by the database compliance officer, 85% of the search returns were unauthorized and unmasked.

The time-frames here are too coincidental to be accidental. [Judge Collyer Report]

From the operational description of Mr. Patrick Byrne it would appear Ms. Butina was used by the FBI to “dirty-up” political targets, opening them up for surveillance.

The FBI/NSA database can be used in real time, or in historic mapping, to monitor people simply by entering their cell phone number and filtering the geolocation.   Additionally, texts, call logs, emails, and sensitive electronic communication can all be reviewed by officials using this database.

Perhaps we will learn more as this story unfolds.  Until then, what Patrick Byrne is describing is an illicit and intentional use of an FBI counterintelligence operation to monitor the political campaign of the opposing party.

Maria Butina likely did have sketchy intentions from a U.S. strategic interest perspective; and monitoring her was perhaps justifiable.  However, specifically directing Butina on where to go and who to meet is another kettle-o-fish entirely.

That corrupt aspect is likely why Mueller, Weissmann and the corrupt small group within the DOJ and FBI, wanted Butina locked away in strict isolation.

♦ Lastly, it’s worth noting in the Fox Business interview, Patrick Byrne describing in hindsight being offered a $1 billion bribe of sorts to stay quiet.  This has peaked many curious questions; however, it is worth noting a bribe as described could come in a multitude of forms for a businessman who operates a massive corporation.

In 2018 Mr. Byrne’s company, Overstock, was under an SEC investigation.


I’m sure it is just a coincidence, but FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok’s wife, Melissa Hodgman, happens to be the Assoc. Director of the SEC Enforcement Division, who happened to be leading the SEC investigation of Patrick Byrne’s company. [LINK]

So the wife of the FBI agent who was directing Patrick Byrne in the sketchy FBI operation targeting Donald Trump… just happens to open an investigation of Byrne shortly after the corrupt FBI operation containing her husband first hit the headlines in early 2018.

I wonder if the elimination of that SEC investigation was worth, oh, say $1 billion.

Huh, imagine that?


Small world.



This entry was posted in AG Bill Barr, Big Stupid Government, Cold Anger, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2016, FBI, IG Report Clinton Investigation, IG Report Comey, IG Report FISA Abuse, IG Report McCabe, media bias, Notorious Liars, NSA, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Russia, Spygate, Spying, THE BIG UGLY, Treason, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

828 Responses to Details Behind Patrick Byrne Allegations of FBI “Political Espionage”…

  1. Eagle says:

    To make all this work for Hillary and the FBI, and the Special prosecutors office, there had to be millions in bribes. Bribes come in all forms. Jobs, money, Etc.. I bet much of it came before the spying began. Eight years of Obama, and the apple has rotted to its core.

    Liked by 3 people

    • bertdilbert says:

      Sounds like they were running an extortion/blackmail racket. It is always about power and money. I remember when the DOJ attacked Walmart with intentional misrepresentation under Holder. The DOJ was intentionally trying to move the stock price. I wonder how many times the DOJ did this and leaked the info? Somebody was making money.

      Liked by 4 people

      • bertdilbert says:

        If you control the DOJ and SEC, you can make billions right there. Controlling the bully pulpit of the office of the president is more billions.

        Liked by 3 people

      • strateshooter says:

        How the hell is Barr going to sort out this mess ?
        Massive widespread corruption now on view in DC.
        Previously we suspected it existed. Now we KNOW it exists.
        Thousands of corrupt scumbags in the DOJ, FBI, CIA, UniParty thinking they are the Chosen Ones to rule and subvert the will of the people.
        Personally I think the only way to resolve all this for the good of the USA going forward is
        1. Fire all connected to Obama Admin on the assumption they are corrupt and replace with new younger personnel from FlyOver states.
        2. Tell the fired ones they have one week to come clean/notify Durham team of known malfeasance if they want to stand any chance of their jobs back.
        3. Make a list of the top 5000 pols/bureaucrats/media flunkies who took part in espionage/blackmail/cover ups/sedition.(you have to cut off somewhere).
        4. Arrest them using the Marines.(6AM Roger Stone type deals).
        5.Ship them to Guantanamo Bay for subsequent trial by Military Tribunal.
        6. If proved guilty > BIG JAIL TIME and confiscation of all assets.

        Won’t happen though > BARR is swamp >he will protect the institutions at all costs because he will convince himself that it is the best interest of the US government.

        The Only person to trust in DC is called Donald J Trump.


  2. WeThePeople2016 says:

    As I posted on another thread last night, I think he us telling the truth. He seems to be talking fast because he has a lot to say. He has held onto this for a long time and it seems he wants it off of his chest. It sounds like it is a large, complicated story. He is very stressed which is understandable. He us dealing with the Deep State and doesn’t know whom to trust.

    Liked by 8 people

  3. Val says:

    Clinton should have consequences for all her devil and helping Russia in the USA. Bring her in front of superior court. She got away from murder and now needs her in our laws of our constitution. Why is it the fbi even did bribery. Mr Bryan I’m proud of you telling the truth but I wouldn’t know who to tell?? Who to explain what happened to higher up what did hilarity Clinton do set our President up!!

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Eagle says:

    ….. and the take away, this thing called the Federal government was bought and paid for by friends of Obama. It is no longer a government by the people, for the people. Obama destroyed it.

    Liked by 12 people

    • albertus magnus says:

      No. The problems existed before Obama, at least since the first Bush’s presidency.

      Liked by 9 people

      • Patience says:

        O was the selected one; as agenda could be rammed through, via “race, race, race”. divide &/ to control.

        Bottom up, Top down.

        Liked by 6 people

      • Deb says:

        Before that. Kennedy and Johnson. Nixon was a fool who got in the way. Reagan was a reprieve, but he didn’t secure his legacy. The “progressive movement” had been on the march for over a century.

        Liked by 11 people

      • Spooky says:

        Yes! Remember the Waco Massacre and the Ruby Ridge debacle. Both handled by an FBI that has been corrupt, devious, incompetent and murderous for a very long time. The Federal Bureau of Incompetence was warned in advance about the Boston Bombers and did nothing. They were warned about the Parkland shooter and did nothing. They were warned about the Orlando gay nightclub shooter and did nothing. They allowed mass shooter Dylan Roof to legally purchase guns because they failed to notify their own background check system of his disqualifications. They protected mobster Whitey Bulger for decades. They hounded innocent people like the Steven Hatfield and Richard Jewell while ignoring the guilty parties who were right under there noses!

        Don’t believe anyone who tells you that its just a few bad apples at the top (looking at you Hannity and Levin!). This is a fundamentally evil and thoroughly un-American secret police agency that behaves like a noxious combination of Gestapo and NKVD.

        Liked by 4 people

        • Nancy Murphy says:

          The FBI did however nail Martha Stewart.


        • Alan Reasin says:

          Spooky says: August 23, 2019 at 12:52 pm:
          “They allowed mass shooter Dylan Roof to legally purchase guns because they failed to notify their own background check system of his disqualifications” Actually since what he did was when he was a juvenile and juvenile records are not placed in the NICS database. Same for the Parkville shooter. The only things missing in the data base are those records and private sales to family and others.
          Here are the data base policies:
          The Gun Control Act of 1968, as amended, 18 U.S.C. 921, et seq., which establishes the following categories of persons who are prohibited from receiving or possessing a firearm:

          1. has been convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year (note this; any crime, in any court IF the person could have been sentenced to > 1 year even if given probation – loss of 2nd Amendment rights)
          2. is a fugitive from justice
          3. is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance
          4. . has been adjudicated as a mental defective or who has been committed to a mental institution (CO theater and VA Tech shooting)
          5. is an illegal or unlawful alien or a non-immigrant alien (with certain exceptions)
          6. has been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions (TX Church shooting)
          7. having been a citizen of the United States, has renounced his citizenship
          8. is subject to a domestic violence protection order that meets certain requirements
          9. has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence
 under indictment for or has been charged with a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year.


        • PBR says:

          Don’t forget the Sutherland Springs church shooter whom the military neglected to give the evidence of his criminal status to the FBI.


      • Yes. For decades the deep state decided on the presidency and they controlled including Obama! The really first president elected by people truly is Trump!


    • TMonroe says:

      His friends include puppet masters like Buffet, who was directly quoted boosting Byrne’s credentials in the Sara Carter trial balloonish story, which says plenty about this matter.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Jean says:

      Fundamental Transformation, dontcha know!

      Liked by 3 people

    • MDNA I says:

      “Meet John Brennan, Obama’s Assassination Czar”
      Patrick Poole 6 June 2012 @ PJ Media

      “A relatively unnoticed article by Associated Press reporter Kimberly Dozier two weeks ago outlined new Obama administration policy changes which consolidated power for authorizing drone attacks and assassinations under political appointees within the White House.

      “The article identifies White House counterterrorism chief John Brennan as the official assuming the role of Obama’s de facto assassination czar, raising concerns even within the Obama administration that THE WHITE HOUSE IS INCREASINGLY TURNING INTO A ‘PSEUDO-MILITARY HEADQUARTERS’ under the direction of just a few senior Obama administration officials.” [emphasis added]


      • TheLastDemocrat says:

        The President of the United States of America is the Commander in Chief of the Military.

        The president of the United States of America lives in the White House, and conducts presidential business from the White House.

        How’s that for making the presidency be “pseudo-military?”

        Liked by 1 person

  5. Tom says:

    So, what do folks think the conversation between Strzok and his wife went like?

    “Hon, I know you might be a bit peeved that I was shagging Lisa on side, but I’ve got a good opportunity for you”.

    Something along those lines? Oh to be a fly on the wall.

    Liked by 3 people

  6. wtd says:

    How Convenient! — Christopher Wray’s Corrupt FBI ‘Loses’ Notes from Meeting Where Corrupt Cop Peter Strzok was Told CHINA was Hacking Hillary’s Emails … via @gatewaypundit

    Liked by 10 people

  7. Bill says:

    If this is all true, we are pretty much screwed. The incestuous nature of the entire power structure of this government is beyond fixable. If Trump is truly alone up there, he better be wearing Teflon every day and using a food tester. God protect him.

    Liked by 11 people

    • Rebecca Joe Pacey says:

      God is protecting POTUS, so keep praying for that and that the people who want to hurt the USA will have a light shined on them and exposed. Amen!

      Liked by 6 people

    • Rynn69 says:

      Not screwed. Nothing is impossible. These are just people. Remember that.


    • donna kovacevic says:

      Please don’t freak out on me, but I always thought Mad Dog Maddis, Tillerson, Sessions John Kelly, Preibus and Bolton are all jokes oh yes Wray as well. Please Our Heavenly Father help and protect PDJT in Jesus’ Precious name Amen.


  8. trapper says:

    A most excellent piece of analysis. A thought:

    “texts, call logs, emails, and sensitive electronic communication can all be reviewed by officials using this database”

    But it is not limited to the data you describe. Remember, voice communications are all digitized (even landline calls). That unnamed agency [wink] scoops up, records, and stores all telephone calls (you think they built those mega storage facilities just to store call log data?). They can listen to both recorded calls, and phone calls in real time. And since we know they did illegal data searches on American citizens (85% of their searches), there is no reason to assume that both illegal listening to recorded calls and real-time listening did not also occur. Information is out there. You just have to let it in.

    Fourth Amendment, meet trash can.

    Liked by 11 people

    • WSB says:

      An FBI agent told us that very thing when he let slip the monitoring of Monica Lewinsky after she met them at the Ritz-Carlton. They listened in real time to her call to warn Bill Clinton’s secretary while using a public pay phone.

      That was years ago.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Patience says:

        Remember when a reporter asked Comey about Americans’ privacy and he replied (with a smirk-smile), “There is no privacy –anymore.” ?

        Liked by 2 people

      • MDNA I says:

        Right. Political surveillance & an adversarial relationship b/w the IC & the WH aren’t exactly uncharted territory. & I too instantly thought of the Lewinsky scandal since that situation, like this one, has many layers…. not as many as this one

        FBI & Starr pulled a few other Mueller-esque moves on Monica & Bill: like confronting her in person & trying to get her to talk w/o a lawyer. Starr basically lured President Clinton into a perjury trap. Emmett Flood was on Clinton’s WH Counsel team as a sort of adviser (so was Cheryl Mills, et al).

        Go back to Ike & Hoover deciding to “cut McCarthy loose” & let the wolves devour him b/c he was starting to ask too many Qs about the nascent IC & they feared a Congressional investigation that would expose it to the public (there were legit concerns ofc there too, not black & white)

        Go back to JFK’s adversarial relationship w/ both the FBI & the CIA. Or LBJ being scared to death of the CIA but also using them to infiltrate & run CI on Goldwater’s campaign (they bugged his plane & stole speeches from him) Or Nixon’s Admin. Or the Church Committee. Or Reagan & Iran-Contra (Ollie North fell on his sword for the Gipper) & so on & so on

        Liked by 3 people

    • Mr e-man says:

      Who did they give this information to? Clinton? Obama?
      What information did they pass along? Campaign strategy? Voter lists? Volunteers to target?

      Liked by 2 people

      • mortgagesforthemasses says:

        Confidential corporate earnings information? Confidential merger and acquisition communications? The Clinton are grifters with an insatiable greed.

        Liked by 3 people

        • mortgagesforthemasses says:

          Maybe the Oracle of Omaha hasn’t been much of an Oracle in the last few decades. Selling information gleaned from the NSA database for industrial-financial espionage would be the mother of all pay-to-play schemes. Ever wonder why there are so many lefty hedge fund billionaires? One could argue they go left to keep the left wing nuts at bay, but more likely for special favors from those they payoff.

          Liked by 4 people

      • trapper says:

        You have to stop thinking of this in the context of a political campaign, or candidates, or a single election. They didn’t give the information to anyone.

        There is a government within the government. Deep State isn’t the vast anonymous bureaucracy that lumbers along, D or R. It is small. It has tentacles. It manipulates outcomes. It is not about money. It is about ideology, shaping and controlling the world, masters of the universe stuff.

        The question to ask yourself is: if you found yourself in a position to participate in such an endeavor, to shape the world to look like what you and some like minded associates would like it to be, without asking anyone else what their preferences were because you think you know better than they do, would you?

        Liked by 1 person

        • mortgagesforthemasses says:

          Meh! There may be true believers, and useful idiots, but those at the top are in it for wealth and power. It has always been thus.

          Liked by 3 people

          • trapper says:

            Whatever rings your bell.

            But seriously. When George Washington was offered the position of “King” of the newly freed colonies, did he turn it down out of greed for wealth and power? When Jefferson wrote the Declaration, and the description of God-given inalienable human rights, was he seeking wealth and power? I believer your view of it is a bit too narrow.

            Liked by 2 people

            • mortgagesforthemasses says:

              Don’t compare apples to oranges. The founders operated on a different moral plain than the those of n the deep state.

              Trump said in October 2016 that this MAGA movement must destroy a corrupt and global political-financial establishment that only serves itself. That’s as simple an explanation as it gets. Power and money drives them.

              Liked by 3 people

              • trapper says:

                Look behind the “corrupt and global political-financial establishment.” There is something else there, something that moves amongst it. The money grubbers are probably the easiest to manipulate to their ends. Most of the time you have to intuit it, look in the empty spaces, listen for the dog that doesn’t bark. Or don’t. Again, whatever rings your bell.


        • trialbytruth says:


          Once upon a time I would have piped in Elton John music into my house 24/7 later it would have been Rod Stewart, later on ELP. I could go on. Now I prefer silence

          If I couldn’t figure out what I needed after 64 years why would I pretend to know what’s good for anyone else.


          Liked by 3 people

  9. Phil aka Felipe says:

    “Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one; for when we suffer or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERMENT, OUR CALAMITY is HEIGHTENED by reflecting that WE FURNISH the MEANS by which WE suffer.”
    ‘Common Sense’ by Thomas Paine (emphasis mine)

    Paine’s words bring pain when we reflect that we furnished the means by which we suffer by granting the power of government to people like those we are seeing exposed.

    Elections do have consequences.

    Liked by 4 people

    • margarite1 says:

      I’m trying to think of a government that is not corrupt. Once …for a while…it was the USA. But I can’t think of a current one.

      Liked by 3 people

    • lfhbrave says:

      With such wisdom, they gave us 2A.

      Liked by 3 people

    • fangdog says:

      Thomas Jefferson studied prior governments before deciding which type government we should have for America. Jefferson called it the 200-year experiment as to its survival. Also, Jefferson decided a Republic such as ours needed a certain voter intelligences in order for sustainability. It is why originally you had to be land owner to vote.

      Jefferson was a champion for an agrarian society because of the mind having to adapt to various conditions which were always changing. Jefferson was afraid a manufacturing society would result in to a robotic mindlessness and lack the critical thinking necessary for a sustainable democracy beyond 200-years. Obviously, our government is at the critical point in time Jefferson had the most concern. Though tried before, Rome’s failure as well as others before Rome failed on or about the 200-year cycle.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Phil aka Felipe says:

        “Jefferson decided a Republic such as ours needed a certain voter intelligences in order for sustainability.”

        Witness the contempt of the coastal elite “intelligences” for our “agrarian” countrymen in flyover country (Trump’s Deplorables) that grow their food – talking about “robotic mindlessness and lack the critical thinking necessary for a sustainable democracy” (I prefer the term representative republic vs democracy)

        Liked by 3 people

  10. ezpz2 says:

    Is ‘Peter’ Byrne a typo, or does Patrick Byrne have a brother involved in this too?

    This is so convoluted with so many moving parts and people, that it’s hard (for me) to follow and understand it all.

    I AM trying, though.

    Liked by 1 person

  11. Jonathan galt says:

    Where does Nardello and Sabina Menschel fit into all of this?


  12. lfhbrave says:

    Somehow I sense he might have grandiose delusional symptom, just like John Nash, in that he connects all important people already identified in the spygate and none of those whom have yet to be been identified.


  13. WeThePeople2016 says:

    As with SD, Dan does a good job breaking down the complicated story.


  14. Marygrace Powers says:

    *Follow the wives. Sundance just dropped s Megaton “coincidence”*


    Rod Rosenstein’s wife, Lisa Barsoomian, is Deep State’s SES lawyer on-call for Clintons, CIA, and FBI/

    “As a federal government attorney, she has represented the CIA, FBI, Robert Mueller, Hillary Clinton, President Bill Clinton, President Barack Obama, James Comey, and other federal agencies multiple times.”

    Her work email may say National Institute of Health (NIH) or Health and Human Services (HHS). The NIH is part of HHS.

    However, in the NIH-HHS’ listing of personnel in their Office of General Counsel, Mrs. Rosenstein is nowhere to be found.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Marygrace Powers says:

      The Powerful Women Behind the Deep State’s Puppets
      Posted: 24 Jul 2018 12:09 AM PDT
      The Powerful Women Behind the Deep State’s Puppets

      “Any astute observer knows that the Deep State has thrust the feminazi movement upon America. However, I am somewhat impressed because the Deep State practices what they preach. The Deep State appears to have a gender equality clause in the performance of their anti-government duties. Behind some Deep State puppets, who are all male, lies their Deep State wives who have considerably more power than their spouses.”

      The Women Behind the Deep State Puppets

      Rod Rosenstein’s Wife, Lisa Barsoomian

      Lisa Barsoomian is the poster child for the Deep State.

      Sometimes, the best clues are the ones hiding in plain sight as evidenced by this tweet.

      “In organized crime terminology, we could categorize at least some of Barsoomian’s duties as that of being the “cleaner”. The cleaner is called to the scene of the crime and erases all the evidence. She has certainly served in that capacity. She is the ultimate shot blocker as she has also served as the guardian of the Deep State secrets gate. Both of these roles are embodied by the following: In the days of Janet Reno’s tenure as the Attorney General, privacy activists’ request for information about the FBI Carnivore email surveillance system were received and ignored by the FBI. It took a court action to partially release a small part of the program which showed that the system erased 4th Amendment protections for all Americans. Representing the FBI and their resistance to the FOIA requests was Lisa Barsoomian.”

      Liked by 2 people

      • Debra says:

        That ‘feminazi movement’ is the REAL divide this country is facing, not the contrived racial animus.

        Females have been embolden to ‘BE’ male, and what they have failed to realize is, they (women) are very poor substitutes of men (see soccer saga).

        Male AND female are complementary roles, NOT adversarial roles. Once a mindset is established that the sexes are adversarial, then women MUST exert superiority, or else, in their misguided minds, they have lost.

        This dynamic, as adversarial rather than complementary, is the bane of all of civilization, in that civilization cannot exist without that complementary role being utilized to create stable, well-minded individuals to carry on . . .

        Liked by 2 people

  15. Bobster says:

    I think it’s entirely possible that Hillary Clinton was included for the sole purpose of giving the appearance of impartiality, and that she was never a serious “target”. If they hadn’t included her, those being asked to participate would’ve been immediately suspicious because the political motivation behind the operation would have been blatantly apparent.

    Liked by 8 people

  16. rayvandune says:

    Wow. Overwhelming! That snuck up pretty quietly as just a story about a guy losing his job because he came out as insufficiently anti-Trump or something.

    But help me understand something. You make a good case that Butina makes it easy for the FBI to dirty up a campaign for using the NSA to spy on it. But then Adm. Rogers does an audit and finds 85% of queries were illegal. Huh? How were the queries determined to be illegal, if Butina, et al were legit targets?


    • dd_sc says:

      It’s like entrapment. Sundance points that out:

      Maria Butina likely did have sketchy intentions from a U.S. strategic interest perspective; and monitoring her was perhaps justifiable. However, specifically directing Butina on where to go and who to meet is another kettle-o-fish entirely.

      The IG that did the original investigation and reported to Adm. Rodgers may have figured out what FBI was doing; or at least had suspicions.

      Yet another reason to declassify that report by Judge Collyer.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Concernedcitizen says:

        Butina was to be utilized by the FBI in much the same way as Azra Turk was used. That is, to dirty up Trump staffers.


  17. rayvandune says:

    Wow. Overwhelming! That snuck up pretty quietly as just a story about a guy losing his job because he came out as insufficiently anti-Trump or something.

    But help me understand something. You make a good case that Butina makes it easy for the FBI to dirty up a campaign for using the NSA to spy on it. But then Adm. Rogers does an audit and finds 85% of queries were illegal. Huh? How were the queries determined to be illegal, if Butina, et al were legit targets?


  18. BitterC says:

    Considering Maria was thrown in jail (pending trial) in July of 2018, he sure did take his time.
    Wonder why it took the DOJ so long to move against her?

    Liked by 2 people

    • Judith says:

      Looks like the answer is “leverage.” Apparently, Maria B was transferred into a better (safer?) facility, and out of solitary confinement, after Byrne’s cooperation.

      Or could it be vice versa?

      Maybe Maria B’s move from solitary confinement indicates her *cooperation,* which in turn compelled
      Byrne to come out in front of her story, with a fake nod to Hellary, in hopes of saving her (and who knows who else’s) skin? (I’m sure *she* was the injured party, just like candidate Trump. /s)

      Oh, the palace intrigue! One thing I know by now is NEVER to take any story, as relayed through the Enemedia, at face value. Always turn it over to see if it makes sense from a different perspective.

      Liked by 1 person

  19. Kleen says:

    Dan Bongino just labeled PB credible! He thinks he is telling the truth.

    Patrick is Glenn Beck’s friend. So is DB

    They know a lot of people in common.

    Dan started his public ( media) career through GB

    Sarah Carter was also working for Glenn at the Blaze.

    PB went to Sarah Carter for the first exclusive interview about this story.

    I know this circle of people. ( as a news consumer not personally) As credible as it gets now days.

    You may not like Glenn, but he was awesome a few years ago. Most people at the Blaze are the best! Buck Sexton, Sarah, Dana Loesh, Jones, etc.

    The most reliable circle of media people out there. Not perfect, but responsible and credible.

    Patrick B is credible and he is a right winger. His emotions are real

    I believe him 100% however we don’t know the whole story. He gave us a glimpse of what’s to be revealed.

    He knows A LOT MORE. We don’t… yet. He wants to talk but I think can’t at this time.

    Liked by 2 people

  20. Excellent work! I wonder if Byrne knows Hillary was a supporter of the spying operation? lol Why would the FBI/DOJ ask him to spy on her campaign? Interesting twist.


  21. We the people know says:

    They never thought Hillary would lose.
    The question is: When did they know that Hillary could lose? That’s the date everything started. Everything.

    June 16, 2015 Donald Trump announces his candidacy.

    In December of 2015 Mr. Byrne became suspicious of the FBI motives because he warned FBI officials of a potential that his efforts, his reputation and those who trust him, may result in Butina gaining entry into campaign confidences. The FBI agents told Byrne that was exactly the intent; people high up in the FBI wanted Ms. Butina to gain deep access into the Trump campaign.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Allard Otten says:

      It wasn’t about stopping him (them) from winning the election, it was about destroying him (them) after they won.
      Bernie gets a fast car and a lake house for his Washington Generals act, Jeb gets a guacamole bowl shipment for playing patsy, while the rest get their lives destroyed for daring to come in uninvited and try to rough up the gang.

      Liked by 5 people

  22. Gil Stonebarger says:

    Unfortunately, as long as folks sit and HOPE for will not come. That is the problem with pushing an idea like Q or the Big Ugly…false hope…just like trust sessions, trust Barr…..falso hope stops people from making HARD decisions.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Judith says:

      Pressure valves release just enough steam to ward off an explosion. Sometimes, it seems these ‘tick tock’ revelations are timed to do just that, release steam. Coupled with this unrelenting media blitz, people are just weary of it all. And that’s all by design, no doubt.

      My cold anger gets warmer as the wheels of justice rust in place. These court jesters are not the least bit entertaining, and I am not distracted by their red laser dots.

      I already see the Demonrats -left hand- and I fully expect incoming from the RepubliCONS -a right uppercut?- as this election draws near. Byrne’s convoluted story could very well be part of it.


  23. Tom says:

    I think the word you mean to use is “piqued” where you write “This has peaked many curious questions…”

    Liked by 2 people

  24. Truthfilter says:

    Funny thought: In one interview, Byrne says he grew quite fond of Butina and they did have a romantic relationship. He has to feel some responsibility given the fact that his girl has since been wrongfully accused, convicted, and locked up in solitary confinement. Who’s to say that Byrne’s going public isn’t partially motivated by…….duty and love?

    Plenty of wars have been started for love. Kings, princes, and whole countries have fallen because of it.

    Yeah, yeah -I know. I can’t believe I even entertained the idea. I’ll go back to being old and cynical.

    I can’t wrap my head around this Byrne character, though. I think he’s an extremely intelligent man and probably a sensitive one, too-maybe even to a fault. Going public with his story actually assures him and his companies more safety than being quiet. It starts the process of securing justice and freedom for his lady friend. (Barr had her moved to a better facility.). Adding Hillary to the list of politicians who were surveilled guarantees the interest of every MSM news outlet to cover his story. He knew that the fake news media would never cover a story that vindicated only the POTUS. Maybe this isn’t a Deep State ploy.


    • wondering999 says:

      Yes. “He has to feel some responsibility given the fact that his girl has since been wrongfully accused, convicted, and locked up in solitary confinement.” What kind of person would not feel guilty for their role in something like this? If it were a woman honeypot, most people would immediately trash their character — maybe Mr. Byrne doesn’t want to be trashy, which certainly appears to be one possibility. Getting romantically involved with people in order to use/inform on them is exceedingly scuzzy

      Liked by 1 person

  25. ezgoer says:

    Please wise up. McConnell and Paul Ryan were every bit as complicit in the coup to get rid of Trump as Obama and Hillary. That is why GOP allowed the Mueller show. That is why the DOJ including Barr is doing everything they can to prevent documents from being released and the coup leaders exposed. Barr is not working to expose and indict anything or anyone. The GOPe wants this whole dirty caper covered up and buried.

    Liked by 4 people

    • BitchyPants says:

      I’ve always wondered if Barr was brought in to save Mueller’s ass – to end the “Russia BS” because everything was being exposed? How the hell did Barr get installed so fast when Whittaker was causing pure agony to the Dems? Things that make you go hmmm…


  26. Right to reply says:

    Why is no one curious about the omission of this man from the spying list? On February 20, 2016, Bush announced his intention to drop out of the presidential race following the South Carolina primary. Jeb Bush believed it was a given that he would win. He was shocked when Trump delivered his knockout blows! This whole thing for me has the fingerprints of McCain, Bush, Clinton’s, and the not so secret services. Bush, or Clinton, would be the same pig in a different mask!

    Liked by 3 people

  27. Sharon says:

    From the post: “Alarmingly this points to ongoing corrupt officials that still remain inside the current DOJ.”

    Illustrating again that a whole lot of people “knowing what is so” will not force a just outcome.

    I think (understandably) that a lot of the excitement over new insights or fresh, even deeper, confirmation of what was suspected is due to a lingering expectation that revelation (exposure) and confirmation guarantees a just outcome.

    The combination of corrupt personnel and desperate political goals makes momentum for justice a very difficult climb. A just outcome would be inevitable if 99% of those in places of authority and decision-making were supportive of our Republic, but the roster of players at all levels does not have 99% who are supportive of our Republic. That is definitely alarming.

    Our national house is on fire.

    Liked by 1 person

  28. Atomic Hillbilly says:

    I fell asleep in the USA, but I woke up in the globalist police province of utopiastan.

    Liked by 1 person

  29. chojun says:

    The $1B proffer was likely extortion – the SEC investigation could’ve *cost* Byrne $1B.

    There’s a shadow Government in the US and these people are sick, evil people.

    Liked by 2 people

    • DJ says:

      No, the company itself is worth less than a billion. At most, it would cost Byrne his stake which is worth about $100 million. That’s not chump change, but the billion dollar figure doesn’t make any sense.


      • chojun says:

        I understand that and agree with the figures but I doubt anyone in Government would be stupid enough to offer a bribe.

        Liked by 1 person

      • gda53 says:

        The stock price peaked in 2018 and the value of the company at that time would have been closer to $2B.

        So does it make more sense now?

        When exactly was the bribe offered?


        • DJ says:

          Yeah, that was a very brief runup on blockchain speculation. Not even Byrne believed the stock was worth 80 bucks a share. The market quickly agreed and the stock price returned to its previous price range which was between 5 and 30 going all the way back to 2003.


      • Bogeyfree says:

        Byrne seems like a man who cares about his employees.

        So maybe you get to the $1B if they are able to destroy Overstock the company, to the point they force bankruptcy and/or employees to lose their jobs and what impact does this have on the families?

        Maybe that gets one closer to $1B


  30. Scott says:

    Has any intrepid reporter been knocking on Barrs’ door to verify if he talked to Byrne and what Byrne is saying is being investigated?




  31. Troublemaker10 says:



  32. sarasotosfan says:

    Here is the Cuomo interview of Byrnes on CNN. Go to 23:38


  33. Pat Childs says:

    I think he believes the Epstein death was a hit job and thought silence was more deadly than not.

    Liked by 1 person

  34. Another Scott says:

    “why Mueller wanted Butina locked away in strict isolation“ when you say Mueller do you actually mean Mueller or do you mean the Mueller team, Andrew Weissmann et. al. I am not so sure Mueller himself knew any details about the investigation he headed.


  35. swamph8er says:

    The FBI already had plenty on the Clintons, but everything they had also implicated themselves…until the server/email investigation. It would explain why they made it go away. They set the stage to get something in return after she won the election.

    Things the FBI already knew about the Clintons that could be used to blackmail:

    Uranium One
    Setting up the DNC primaries
    Clinton Foundation

    Trying to wrap my cranium around the Clinton blackmail part. Ideas?

    Liked by 3 people

    • Uncle Max says:

      There has to be a LOT of knowledge about money laundering and or just fraud via the Clinton foundation(s). The Haiti stuff , etc. The entire Clinton machine is built on favors and secrets and illicit money. Plenty of dirt for anyone looking to leverage against Hillary and Bill. The thing is, no one was. She was supposed to win.

      For the first time in 40 years the Clintons are vulnerable because she lost, and the two of them have no path back to power. It is all unraveling in real time.

      Liked by 2 people

    • donna kovacevic says:

      That whole Clinton spiel is “govnarije” I don’t believe a word of it.


  36. mostlyogauge says:

    The United States of America is the first country in the history of the world to have a Constitution and Bill of Rights that affirms that the rights of USA Citizens are God given rights, that the powers of government are limited, and that government powers are granted to the government by We the People, the consent of the governed.

    The effort to change this was started about two minutes after the ink was dry on the Declaration of Independence. I can just imagine a bunch of snarky Brit royals sitting around the fireplace sipping whatever they sipped back then saying haughtily that this will not stand. How DARE those upstart colonials defy us! We’ll show them! We’ll kick their asses back to the stone age! Or, words to that effect.

    The effort intensified after the Treaty of Paris in 1883. The War of 1812 was the brits effort to regain control of the “colonies”. Then came the Civil War. If the South had won the Civil War (The War of Northern Aggression), we probably would not be the US of A at this point. I think that both the brits and the frenchies (and maybe others?) were hoping the South would win; a country divided cannot stand. The brits and/or the french would then have invaded the South at multiple locations and completely overwhelmed what is now the southern USA. They then would have invaded what was the North and the rest of the undeveloped land in the midwest and west, and probably taken over the whole country.

    I have grudgingly come to admit that Lincoln was right in doing whatever he had to do to keep the Union together, but we are still paying for his lawlessness and unconstitutional actions today.

    What we have seen since the end of WWII, and continuing with the attempted coup during 2017-2019, is the Globalists efforts to make this country the same as every other country on Earth; countries of subservient people enslaved to the “elites” or “our betters” that treat their “subjects” or “the deplorables” or “the great unwashed” like cannon fodder and are theirs to do with whatever they want.

    Lincoln did do the right thing, however flawed the effort and the result. In any event, I would not have it any other way. I am still a United States Citizen, born here and will die here, a citizen of the greatest country on the face of the Earth. We are the freest, the most independent, the most giving, the most innovative, and the hardest working people EVAH! MAGA! KAG!

    Just, ah, my 2 cents.

    Liked by 2 people

    • wondering999 says:

      Keep in mind that the French DID invade Mexico during the United States’ Civil War. The European Habsburg “Emperor” that they installed was executed after Benito Juarez managed to fend off the French (with help from Abraham Lincoln and weapons that were “lost” at the Texas border), The European aristocracy did sympathize with the Confederacy, not only because so many of them approved of various forms of serfdom and slavery, but also because they wanted to see the United States crumble. There are discussions of this in newspapers of the 1860s

      Liked by 2 people

    • WES says:

      Mostly: From my studies of the US civil war, it would have been imposible for Britain or France to have invaded the US simply because at that moment in history the US had the biggest and most modern armies in the war!

      Few people realize that the technologies of warfare changed drastically during the US civil war. Rifles and artillery guns went from smooth bore with ball and powder to spiral bores greatly increasing accuracy and range. Not to mention cartridges and the Gatlng gun!

      By the end of the US civil war the US had the most modern and powerful army in the world!

      Liked by 1 person

  37. slothb77 says:

    The Strzok wife angle is interesting and makes this even more suspicious. It would help if Byrne could elucidate all of this himself instead of making unspecific claims.


    • SwampRatTerrier says:

      Byrne claims he is a 56 year old “life long bachelor.”


      That has always been code for “homosexual.”

      There’s a stinky smell all over this – especially since he’s so busy doing virtue signaling in certain sections of the interviews.

      It reminds me of when the Leftist/Communist Globalist controlled Dems starting using the pat little phrase of “Thank you for your service” to Vets.

      That sent creepy chills up my spine the first I heard them use it and it still does.


  38. WeThePeople2016 says:

    I agree.

    Liked by 3 people

  39. TJ says:

    Sounds like an extortion racket. Hodgman scrubbed her fakebook shrine to Obama/Clinton/DNC and was promoted for her failures before the 2016 election. Comey has denied Byrne’s accusations on the conspiracy news network(cnn).

    Comey pushes back on ex-Overstock CEO claims: ‘The FBI doesn’t work that way’


  40. snellvillebob says:

    Possibly the FBI wanted her to spy on Hillary to see if she was double-crossing the FBI. I do not sense a lot of trusts there, but in the end, two dozen people lost their jobs and Hillary is still untouched. One would think some of them would be pissed enough to turn on her. Or I wonder just how much she spent paying them off?


  41. Sherri Young says:

    The website is accessible again at the moment. Go there and read until your eyes and mind cannot take it anymore. Start with Patrick Byrne’s profile on the About page. You’ll see that he focused his formal education on ethics and philosophy.

    He may be the natural enemy of the Deep State that serves the banking cabal, but he is not your philosophical enemy. The main danger he might present would be that he is a truth teller who could serve to destabilize the central banks, IMF, and BIS. He energetically spoke out against corruption and tried to educate people almost 20 years ago. Now, he tries to sidestep the corrupt banking and financial systems by boosting crypto.

    I have never looked too far into cryptocurrency and the block chain. I have earned a little money researching mineral and royalty chain of title, so I assume the concept is the same.

    My question: Is there a way to engage in fractional reserve lending in crypto without first creating a synthetic?

    Liked by 2 people

    • Kaco says:

      Here is an interesting comment after this post on there:

      “If you thought fiat currencies were bad for the middle class, wait till the governments start to use blockchain crypto currencies. We can see governments and all the multinational corporations salivating over this.

      At some point they’ll hit the “kill” switch and massive numbers of people will die of one thing or another they would not have otherwise if honest money was used instead.

      Just know that there is blow-back from this movement from a growing number of state legislatures opting instead for the money of the original US Constitution. When that hits critical mass it will spark the call for a Constitutional Convention over the matter, and crytpo currencies won’t be what is the focus. It will be REAL money.”

      Is cryptocurrency how they’re going to take all of us down that have U.S. dollars?


      • Sherri Young says:

        I have no idea. I’ve never touched crypto because it is an idea more than an asset. There are stories of credit default swaps not paying out because credit events have been deemed not to have reached threshold. I wouldn’t know the details because I no longer look at such things. We did see MF Global go “poof” and the CME not meet their obligation to make good on the outstanding contracts.

        If I understand correctly, crypto that is in circulation would be hard to nuke in a single outage event because the authentication of the chain of title is distributed across multiple computers worldwide. However, the information is synced in some manner, so there is probably a way for a malicious attack to work. Since my understanding is limited, my investment is nonexistent.

        Patrick Byrne’s writing influenced me back when I was playing around in the markets. What he said about Cede & Co., leverage, naked short selling with failure to deliver prepared me for understanding the 2008/2009 crash and Madoff.

        If I want alternatives to federal reserve notes, I’ll need to stick with gold, silver, a bit of real estate, and staying out of debt.


  42. Bogeyfree says:

    So who investigates the SEC?

    How do we know their investigation into Overstock was about intimidation or sending a message??

    Can Byrne’s lawyers sue the SEC and with discovery gain access to Strzok’s wife emails, texts etc.??

    We know the IRS was used to go after the Tea Party.

    If Byrne was smart he would hire Joe DiGenova today!

    Maybe judicial Watch needs to tee up some more FOIA requests??

    Liked by 2 people

  43. Caius Lowell says:

    Corrupt FB! agent Strzok had to do this for “security reasons” — i.e., to keep 0bama safe…


  44. Laramie Evan says:

    My two takeaways are:

    1. It is really astonishing just how corrupt our federal government has become. I’m not so naive to think it all occurred on Obama’s watch. The Clintons perfected the “Chicago way” of patronage politics and insisting on blind loyalty and a blind eye to corruption long before Obama got there. I believe that’s where the DOJ started to become corrupt, and it took 25 years to finish the job. Nor do I excuse the Bushes in this mess, but corrupting the DOJ to tilt one way likely didn’t get much of an assist from Republicans — I’m just speculating but entrenching the Deep State is one thing; convincing it to favor one party over another is a separate thing. The latter appears to be what they’ve been building up to.

    2. Reinforcing the above point is the genuine degree to which mainstream media outlets continue to ignore this scandal. Anyone who objectively asks himself what the media would do if all this were reversed — the Deep State tried to tilt an election for Republicans and against Democrats through their spying powers — would have to concede that this would be the scandal of the century. Indeed, we saw exactly what the media did with something that doesn’t even rise to this level. It is called Watergate, and Pulitzers were handed out to those who investigated it. It was front page news for years and is still cited to this day as evidence of corruption. The fact that “they” ignore this story today speaks volumes about how corrupt the media has become.

    Roll those two things together, and it further reinforces my concern over whether it can be fixed. A corrupt government is one thing. The media can highlight its abuses. But, a corrupt government ad corrupt media? Difficult combination.

    Liked by 2 people

  45. leftnomore says:

    Shut down the damm FBI and DOJ. They are so infiltrated to be unredemptive. Until we have a complete clearing-out these agencies are not to be trusted.


  46. lurker2 says:

    Here’s some info regarding Byrne’s claim that he assisted the FBI investigating the death of his friend Brian Williams, who is also known as Bison Dele:

    On July 6, 2002 Dele and his girlfriend, Serena Karlan, along with skipper Bertrand Saldo, sailed from Tahiti on Dele’s catamaran, the Hukuna Matata. Dele’s brother, Miles Dabord (born Kevin Williams), was the only person involved in the voyage who was seen or heard from after July 8, 2002, when the last of three satellite phone calls from the voyage was made. Dele and Karlan had previously kept regular contact with their banks and family members. On July 20, Dabord brought the boat into Tahiti; he was alone aboard the vessel.

    On September 5, 2002, police used a sting operation organized by Dele’s family and friends to detain Dabord in Phoenix, Arizona. Dabord had forged Dele’s signature in order to buy US$152,000 worth of gold under his brother’s name, using Dele’s passport as identification. Mexican police later found that Dabord had been staying at a hotel in Tijuana, Mexico. Two days before, the Hukuna Matata, which had been registered in Tahiti under another name, was found off the coast of Tahiti with its name plate removed and some possible bullet holes patched. About the same time, Dabord phoned his mother, Patricia Phillips, telling her that he would never hurt Dele and that he could not survive in prison.

    The FBI and French authorities became involved in the investigation, and concluded that Dele, Karlan and Saldo were probably murdered and then thrown overboard, or forced to walk off the boat into the ocean, by Dabord. Given that the bodies were likely dumped in the middle of the Pacific Ocean, it would be highly unlikely that the three would ever be found.

    Dabord, the only first-person source of information regarding the case, intentionally overdosed on insulin and slipped into a coma. On September 27, 2002, Dabord died in a California hospital. In his account of events, Dabord said he and his brother had fought, and that Karlan had been accidentally hit and died when her head struck part of the boat. When Saldo wanted to report her death, a panicked Dele killed him; Dabord then shot his brother in self-defense, threw the bodies overboard and subsequently fled back to the U.S. After Dabord’s suicide, officials did not expect to find much more regarding the case. A memorial service was then held for both Dabord and Dele.

    The brothers were frequently at odds with each other. After Dabord’s death, his lawyer and lifelong best friend, Paul White, was questioned regarding his client but gave little information about what happened. Dabord had said that he knew for sure that Dele and Karlan were in French Polynesia, but not much more other than that he was trying to help Dele.

    Someone who knows, would Byrne need secret security clearance to participate in any way in the investigation of a suspicious death of his friend? If someone is asked to wear a wire or do something else more extraordinary than just provide info, would that person need clearance? I can’t imagine why they would.


  47. gda53 says:

    X, Y & Z. Members of the Obama Admin. Not Brennan, McCabe or Comey or any of the other FBIers or NPCs.

    We all know that Brennan was the (main) facilitator in the grand scheme. But who was the Big Boss Man? Was it one of X, Y or Z? Or were they just following orders from the Big Boss Man?

    If I were to guess, I would say VJ fits the bill as the go-between and O-handler, being the one in the WH to whisper in O’s (big) ears to order minions X, Y & Z to have Brennan et al carry out the grand scheme.

    So who were the 3 individuals closest to O in the WH? Or is it 2 (assuming O might be one of them)?

    And who is the Big Boss Man (or Men/Cabal)? Is there perhaps an Iranian connection? Seems rather coincidental that O focused exclusively on the Iran Deal from Day 1 and completely f***ed up the ME by his other actions or non-actions therein.

    Liked by 1 person

    • lurker2 says:

      From Sundance’s article:

      It was within these June and July 2016 engagements where FBI agents were apologetic about the requests and specifically mentioned their instructions were coming from three principle FBI officials Byrne described as “X, Y and Z”. Later Byrne identified FBI Director James Comey as “Z”.

      All three are FBI and one of them is Comey.


  48. evergreen says:

    Barr’s U.S. Attorney: “Byrne, you’re under oath. Did the FBI tell you that the purpose of your objective was to dirty the republican candidate with exposure to your Russian contact?”


    “Mr. FBI Agent, you’re under oath. Did you tell Byrne….?”

    What’s the answer? I’d like to see it posed under oath to a handful of guys.


  49. Bogeyfree says:

    I keep asking out legal beagles…………

    Who holds Barr accountable? Anyone?

    What are his obligations under the law if he is personally presented with evidence from a whistleblower that alleges or implicates political espionage and fails to act on it??

    Can Byrne’s lawyers sue AG Barr?? Or is Barr’s decision if he choses to do nothing the final word?

    What protections if any are in our Constitution if this type of scenario were to arise??


Leave a Reply to TJ Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s