White House Responds to Nadler Subpoena for Counsel Don McGahn…

Most media have avoided highlighting how Jerry Nadler has not demanded testimony from presumed author of the special counsel report, Robert Mueller.  It is likely the Judiciary Committee’s lack of interest surrounds the fact they know Mueller was a figurehead with no substantive control over the small group led by Andrew Weissmann.  The special counsel probe, with sunlight upon Mueller, would be a risk to Nadler.

AG Bill Barr has no issue with Mueller testifying; likely because he too knows Mueller appearing for testimony without his “small group” handlers could lead to a full collapse of the special counsel/media narrative. Meanwhile, the White House delivers a response to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler following his subpoena for former White House Counsel Don McGahn:

WHITE HOUSE – At the President’s direction, the White House has been completely transparent with the Special Counsel’s investigation. The Special Counsel received more than 1.4 million documents and hours and hours of interviews from White House officials, including more than 30 hours from former Counsel to the President, Don McGahn. The Democrats do not like the conclusion of the Mueller investigation – no collusion, no conspiracy, and no obstruction – and want a wasteful and unnecessary do-over.

The House Judiciary Committee has issued a subpoena to try and force Mr. McGahn to testify again. The Department of Justice has provided a legal opinion stating that, based on long-standing, bipartisan, and Constitutional precedent, the former Counsel to the President cannot be forced to give such testimony, and Mr. McGahn has been directed to act accordingly. This action has been taken in order to ensure that future Presidents can effectively execute the responsibilities of the Office of the Presidency. (link)

Formal notification letter (source pdf available here):

(source pdf)

Legal guidance from the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel, below:

.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in AG Bill Barr, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Transition, Election 2016, Election 2020, FBI, Legislation, media bias, Nancy Pelosi, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Russia, Spygate, Spying, THE BIG UGLY, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

149 Responses to White House Responds to Nadler Subpoena for Counsel Don McGahn…

  1. Elric VIII says:

    As much as the Democrats would like to get Mueller to testify to the committee, the spectacle of Mueller bashing President Trump would be far outweighed by the dangerous questions the Republican members would ask. They can’t take that chance, so… Nothing to see here, move along!

    Liked by 18 people

    • Goedhart says:

      “would be far outweighed by the dangerous questions the Republican members would ask.”

      A friend of mine wants to know when the Republicans have ever asked any “dangerous” questions?

      Liked by 10 people

      • steph_gray says:

        When Jim Jordan has been the person speaking, for one thing!

        Liked by 29 people

      • Ilcon says:

        I have yet to see any Rs in DC lay out Mueller’s anti constitutional actions during his entire career. Are they afraid of him?

        Liked by 1 person

      • mazziflol says:

        They would bring Roosterhead out of retirement for just such a questioning…

        Like

      • Daniel says:

        There’s that one attractive representative sitting next to Gowdy who asked a dangerous question to Comey about the FBI not briefing the congressional oversight about sensitive matters… that was pretty good.

        Liked by 5 people

        • BestBets says:

          I think you’re referring to Elise Stefanik? I believe she stumbled across that question by accident or she was handed that question by a member of the Freedom Caucus.

          Liked by 5 people

          • Matthew LeBlanc says:

            Probably the only and last consequential thing she has done for the Republic. Every time I see a list of R’s that voted against PDJT her name appears. Such a waste of a good mind.

            Liked by 8 people

            • Tom22ndState says:

              Exactly Matthew, she voted for the dems (In)equality act last Friday. They seek to cram gender identity into federal civil rights law.

              Liked by 3 people

            • Louisiana Tea Rose says:

              I am not convinced that those questions flowed from her inquisitive mind…

              I think they may have been provided to her from those who would have framed the structure of the hearing.

              These hearing are frequently orchestrated by leadership.

              Liked by 1 person

          • Robert Smith says:

            I think has since proved to be a swamp trainee.

            Liked by 2 people

      • James Felter says:

        Howard Baker–“What did the President know and when did he know it?” US Senator from Tennessee (R), the then Senate minority leader (later Senate majority leader during the Reagan era): He was of course aiming that “dangerous question” at Richard Nixon. Republicans are free to ask dangerous questions of other Republicans…

        Howard Baker was the Mitch McConnell of his time.

        Like

      • CMDCMRET says:

        Your friend should pay more attention to the happenings of the last two years. Perhaps your friend lacks the time and level of interest necessary to truly understand the significance of questions posed by Republicans during the various committee hearings. BTW. A friend of mind doesn’t believe your friend is very bright.

        Liked by 5 people

      • dd_sc says:

        Hopefully different this time around. Collins, Jordan, Ratcliffe, Gaetz, and Gohmert are no longer constrained by Goodlatte and Ryan. I suspect Ratcliffe could effectively destroy Meuller and Weisman if he ever gets the chance to question them.

        Pleasantly surprised by Minority Leader McCarthy hanging back and not gumming up the works like Ryan would. McCarthy seems to align a bit closer to the Freedom Caucus – at least on this issue.

        Liked by 1 person

        • jimboct says:

          I suspect 5 eyes had less on McCarthy than what they have on Ryan (and Romney). Seems that only the people who aren’t corrupt (VSGPDJT and Barr) has zero to worry about from the IC.

          Like

      • MightyMustardSeed says:

        Goedhart – In all truth, many times it has been just President Donald J Trump + God.
        and in God’s reign, that is more than sufficient.

        Liked by 3 people

    • grandmotherpatriot says:

      Wouldn’t matter as the MSM would spin Mueller’s responses.

      Liked by 1 person

    • bertdilbert says:

      The democrats lost the war. It reminds me of stories of after WW2 where Japanese in the Pacific kept fighting because they never got word the war was over. Somebody needs to tell them the war is over and they lost badly.

      Liked by 16 people

    • Hal_S says:

      I feel bad saying it, but Representative Nadler’s stupid political game playing seems to ensure that history will remember him as “Representative NadLESS.”

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Thomas Holsinger says:

    More likely Nadler doesn’t want the GOP Congressmen on the House Judiciary Committee to ask Mueller questions, particularly during televised hearings.

    Liked by 11 people

    • Dutchman says:

      While I would love to see Republians rip Mueller to shreds, I am not sure he could even sustain softball questions from Democrats.

      Mueller won’t appear, no way, no how.
      Wonder if he will be questioned by Durham, and bet he is already lawyered up. Grand jury, mayhaps?

      Liked by 8 people

      • grandmotherpatriot says:

        Mueller has spent the past two years protecting Comey.

        Liked by 4 people

        • MightyMustardSeed says:

          Good point Grandmother – Since election night 2016 we have lived in an ‘upside down, backwards, inside out, twisted logic, that made evil out to be good, and good, ‘and his kind’ something to be stamped out.

          Defending Comey is an exercise in applying logic to insanity. The DS delirium was institutionalized into a frenzy, with participation across all layers of society. In their demented scheme, how gleeful they must have been upon hearing each planted lie gain traction.

          Our great nation was subjected to punitive retribution for questioning the actions of the vindictive past president, the ruthless loser of the presidential race, and the pathologically corrupt highest Intelligence and law enforcement agencies in the world. We watched military style commando raids and arrests, we saw protected records scooped up with impunity. While we were threatened for not accepting their con.

          The cowardly or complicit Sessions, the obstruction of facts by Rosenstein, the contempt from McCabe, Stzrok, Brennan, O—a, Holder, and Comey prove that power is indeed a madness inducing flame.

          Even with the nonsensical investigation, ham-stringing him, our Very Stable Genius President Trump, has accomplished more than all other Presidents in his lifetime – combined. Not only did he emerge blameless, but the process was an expose` of the vile who have infiltrated the fabric of our society.

          Truth will be told by the volumes.

          Liked by 3 people

          • grandmotherpatriot says:

            Good morning and thank-you. Yes , the truth will come out as it always does.
            Meanwhile , we need to focus on 2020 election as Holder and Obama have been busy redistricting Key states using Obama /Dirty Harry Reid Nuked Judges.

            Like

      • chuckyschmucky says:

        And even if he did appear, he and the Democrats would set up strict limits on permitted lines of inquiry, ruling out ANYTHING not directly related to his mandate — which excluded, of course, the corrupt origins of the investigation into the Trump campaign.

        There is absolutely zero chance he will answer any questions related to FISA abuse, informants planted by the FBI, and all of the corruption involved in this hoax.

      • Krashman Von Stinkputin says:

        Without Nadler changing rules…..AGAIN……
        (perhaps to specifically forbid R’s from even asking questions…..)
        or
        attempt to limit questioning
        (perhaps to only the aptly named volume NUMBER TWO.)

        Mueller would be forced to go for Comey’s “I Don’t Recall” record and look like a complete imbecile doing it.

        Not
        A
        Chance

        Liked by 4 people

        • GGHD says:

          You’re right Krashman. Mueller would have to say, ‘I don’t recall.” more times than the Clintons and Comey. … The optics wouldn’t be good for the Democrats. …. It’s against the law to ~lie to Congress. … A lot of Mueller’s cronies would face jail time, if Mueller told the truth. If Mueller lies, he faces jail time. … “I don’t recall” would be his only choice.

          Liked by 1 person

      • Bert Darrell says:

        Mueller might be unable to comply because of some sudden, mysterious illness and could recommend that Andrew Weissman take his place.

        Liked by 2 people

        • tav144 says:

          I don’t even think Weismann would agree to testify. Too compromised and too much that could put him under the gun.

          Like

          • Rhoda R says:

            Agreed. Weismann usually leaves his messes before the accounting begins and lets someone else take the fallout for his actions. Usually the US taxpayer.

            Like

      • Louisiana Tea Rose says:

        Mueller ain’t gettin’ anywhere close to no Congressional committee, House OR Senate. The vulnerability of his current fragile situation….

        Fuggiddabbouttit.

        Like

      • Julian says:

        If Republicans had control over some Congressional committees they could subpoena Mueller to appear like he Democrats have just subpoenaed Don Junior!!

        It’s absolutely disgraceful that the Democrats have subpoenaed Don Junior to appear after he already testified for 30 hours to Congress!!

        An absurd disgrace.

        Of course they will never subpoena Bob Mueller will they!!!

        Like

    • dd_sc says:

      And if Meuller should go before the committee, at least one Democrat will be assigned as the gunslinger to disrupt Republican’s questions while Nadler keeps the clock running.

      That was Elisjah Cummings’ job for years.

      Liked by 5 people

  3. bsdetector4u says:

    In layman’s terminology:

    “Nadler, go pound sand!”

    Liked by 12 people

    • littleanniefannie says:

      Blanco had a cartoon to that effect!

      Liked by 5 people

      • littleanniefannie says:

        Branco (autocorrect)

        Liked by 24 people

        • Or to put it another way:

          Jerry 🖕🏾

          Liked by 4 people

        • Kalena says:

          This is the best political cartoon that I have seen since the one in 2016 came out. That one showed Jeb! and “I’m with her Hillary” on the highway marching lockstep in the same direction. No one was behind them. Then off on the service road, on Jeb!’s side was Trump with a herd following him, and on Hillary’s side was Bernie with a herd following hin on that service road. I loved that cartoon. It was so appropriate for that election cycle.

          I love this one just as much!!!!

          Liked by 4 people

        • Daniel says:

          All I see in all of this is the Democrats trying to make it look like “both sides are doing the same things!” Obama’s administration was riddled with crime and scandal. But what does the media say? “Scandal free!” And we watched as all of these things came out and the AG getting slapped with contempt and then replaced.

          Now it’s their turn! They want to drag the Trump administration around and construct a narrative of all sorts of ridiculous things and they want people to think this is equivalency. Some people are, without a doubt, falling for it. Other people are waking up to see the difference.

          Under Obama, crimes happened and investigations happened to learn about it. Under Trump, investigations happen without any evidence of a crime at all! HUGE difference and it begins with “except upon probable cause” and though I’m sure that part of the bill of rights doesn’t fully apply, it seems inherently wrong to investigate “obstruction” when there’s no evidence of the underlying crime at all and it should be actionable.

          Liked by 3 people

        • Justin Green says:

          The artist here was especially kind to Nadler’s midsection.

          Liked by 1 person

    • Bing says:

      And Nadler could also piss up a rope.

      Liked by 4 people

  4. ALEX says:

    Impressive group of Lawyers at the White House and it goes without saying AG Barr is the captain guiding this reloaded conservative legal juggernaut…Looking forward to the next two years at minimum. These are the type of lawyers and conservatives I can get behind…

    Liked by 11 people

  5. WES says:

    Nadler looks like a chipmunk!

    Liked by 3 people

  6. elvis newton says:

    Cue the hawaiian judge to issue a ruling that mcgahn has to testify based on rep tulsi gabbard being deprived of opportunity to have “oversight” of the president

    Liked by 4 people

  7. ristvan says:

    The WH response is as expected. Executive privilege compounded by client attorney privilege.
    What I cannot understand is why Nadler issued the subpoena in the first place, knowing this would inevitably be the result. He just looks petty and dumb. Same thing with his Barr contempt vote.
    Such clear displays of TDS can only hurt the Dems in 2020 with the collusion delusion Big Ugly now commencing.

    Meanwhile, Pelosi now claiming Dems never said no crisis at the border is just laughable. So she now thinks we have a crisis BUT won’t help PDJT do anything about it?!? More TDS.

    First rule of holes: in one and want out, first stop digging. Dems just keep digging.

    Liked by 10 people

    • steph_gray says:

      Why?

      Fundraising.

      Liked by 5 people

    • redthunder238 says:

      Just to keep the whole “Trump’s hiding something” talking point going. These people have NOTHING.

      Liked by 8 people

    • David says:

      I don’t know. There are just so many people out there who will interpret this as obstruction, or some version of it. I do think it’s the right response (go pound sand), but I assure you 50% of the country will come away think that this is non-cooperation, that the WH is hiding something. This will end up being a minor PR win for Nadler.

      Like

      • Chilidog says:

        Those people will never be satisfied no matter what Trump does. Now that he is no longer under legal threat of the deep state, it is up to Trump to set the terms of engagement with the opposition. The dems concerns should be given no consideration. They can’t be reasoned with, they must be defeated.

        Liked by 7 people

        • Dimbulbz says:

          I think they should send a trained chimpanzee, smoking a cigar to testify. It would be simple, change the monkeys name to “Don” and send him up there. Could you imagine the hilarity of that? I bet they would have to send ambulances in because half of the dems would exibit ‘splody heads. I bet Trump could pull it off…

          Like

      • Robert Smith says:

        I’m pretty sure the public wants it, the Democrats, to stop. They had their shot and they came up with nada. Zip. Zilch.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Car says:

      The Dems in Congress have not been playing by the Constitutional standards for so long ( at least 10 years), they have forgotten the language and rule of law. It’s been a long time since we have had rational ruling out of the DOJ. It’s refreshing. I enjoyed reading this well written DOJ opinion and WH response.
      There are going to be a lot of distractions for Democrats leading into 2020.
      Congress has been twisting Constitutional Law for quite sometime.
      Next…. Unredactions, OIG Report, Criminal Referrals…. 😉

      Liked by 2 people

      • Elle says:

        “There are going to be a lot of distractions for Democrats leading into 2020.”

        I know that is true and that it is the smart way to do it, but it makes me sad because we are just going to have to wait for this to drip, drip, drip, rather than waking up one morning and after pouring a nice cup of hot coffee, turn on the computer to discover that Hillary and Obama have slipped away in the night to a country without an extradition agreement that there have been multiple arrests.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Alan Reasin says:

      The story of Barr not being able to fully release of the Mueller Report because it would be a criminal act due to grand jury information now redacted doesn’t seem to make the MSM news reports. Two progressive ladies at the upscale resort we were staying at in Mexico cornered my wife last week and started asking her questions and showed their absolute ignorance on what is going on with Barr and Mueller. They read only the WaPo, NYT and watch CNN and MSNBC and thought they were much better informed than my wife. She was civil, I would have eaten their lunch.

      Liked by 13 people

      • nimrodman says:

        I’d just say, calmly: “I’m sorry, but you don’t know what you’re talking about. You don’t read widely enough.”

        Repeat as necessary. Don’t get sucked in by taunting or demanding reading sources.

        I’ve stopped arguing with liberals, you both get muddy and the liberal enjoys it.

        Liked by 8 people

        • vikingmom says:

          Thank you! That is a wonderful comeback!! I get suckered in and then, when I bring up FACTS they do not know, I get called names and they storm off in a huff. It really does get old – I like your idea better!

          Liked by 3 people

          • nimrodman says:

            I think I may have given you this one about a week ago, mom, but tell them
            … in a very calm epitome of the “voice of reason”

            “Y’know, in the interests of preserving our friendship, I don’t think it’s healthy to argue politics so strenuously.

            “President Trump is trying to Make America Great Again (TM) and – as Americans – don’t we ALL have a stake in that?

            “I think – as Americans – we should all come together in unity and support our President’s efforts. Don’t you?

            “Then – when his 8 YEARS are up, we can get together for drinks and calmly assess how well he did.

            “Won’t you join me?
            “… as Americans?”

            (“8 years” is a grenade – be ready to duck after that one)

            Liked by 1 person

      • Matthew LeBlanc says:

        I just start laughing when someone mentions they saw something on the news. More and more that includes Fox.

        Liked by 6 people

    • littleanniefannie says:

      Give Nancy a break. Technically she is right. She never said there was no crisis. She led the Media Choir in singing the MANUFACTURED CRISIS Hymn. If you recall, once she and Chucky Poo came out to whine about manufactured crisis, the MSM used the phrase ad nauseam for days. There are some things you can deny Nancy but leading the Manufactured Crisis Chorus is not one of them. There is way too much tape out there with the Puh-lose-ee/Schmucker duet to deny with even a hint of credibility. Then again, what has come from their lips in the past 2 1/2 years that had even a hint of credibility???

      Like

  8. Nigella says:

    I don’t like or trust McGahn

    Liked by 2 people

    • ristvan says:

      Nigella, my view is a bit different. McGahn did a good job as WH Counsel navigating the Mueller SC inquiry (together with PDJT’s other personal attorneys), and his office has produced (with help from Heritage Foundation) an outstanding stream of judicial nominee recommendations.
      But now that PDJT is more on offense than defense, Cippolone is IMO a better WH Counsel for this new phase of strategic swamp draining.

      Liked by 2 people

  9. grandmotherpatriot says:

    Why hasn’t Nadler stepped down or be forced to step down as it is no secret that Nadler has been harassing Mr. Trump now, President Trump since 1990.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Yep! Citizen Trump applied to build low/middle income housing in Jerry’s district (upper west side of Manhattan). Congressman Jerry could not stop the Manhattan council so Jerry told the banks not to fund the project.

      Jerry was worried that the low/middle income residents would vote him out of office.

      Liked by 5 people

    • The Deplorable Tina says:

      Adding to that, Nadler’s son works for a lawfirm that is suing & has sued President Trump:

      https://thefederalistpapers.org/opinion/nadlers-sons-connection-jim-acosta-major-ethics-violation

      “New York Rep. Jerry Nadler, the man at the helm of the cabal that is attacking President Donald Trump, has a major issue on his hands. It has been discovered that his son, Michael Nadler, works for Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, a New York based law firm.

      What is significant about this job is that that office has repeatedly sued President Trump, including on behalf of CNN reporter Jim Acosta, Big League Politics reported.

      “Congressman Jerry Nadler has a big conflict,” our source tells Big League Politics in Washington, D.C. “His son (Michael Nadler) got a job with Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP in 2018. That’s convenient because Jerry Nadler and the Democrats just won control of the House in 2018.

      Gibson Dunn & Crutcher hire Jerry’s son and Gibson Dunn & Crutcher are the main Nemesis against Trump and the Trump Administration on numerous lawsuits.
      Such an arrangement — Jerry Nadler investigating Trump with his son’s firm trying to get access to documents in other cases — violates ethics rules for federal investigators.”

      Liked by 4 people

    • littleanniefannie says:

      “Why hasn’t Nadler stepped down or be forced to step down as it is no secret that Nadler has been harassing Mr. Trump now, President Trump since 1990.”

      That’s exactly why he hasn’t stepped down. Which is also why the Dem party is so high on the likes of Omar and Tlaib as well as AOC. Then there is Chicken Man (AKA Cluck the Wonder Chicken Cohen) and Connolly (who imagines himself as popular as the former Texas governor shot during the Kennedy assassination). This is what the Dem party has become. Nadler is so petty and childish. He even makes Mad Max seem almost normal (a concept I never fathomed remotely possible).

      Liked by 1 person

  10. Adorable deplorable says:

    Is it just me or when you see the word ” honorable” addressing these congress criminals do you feel like vomiting?!!

    Liked by 19 people

  11. cwf60 says:

    They did not expect pushback. It is interesting that no one is screaming about Mueller testifying.

    Liked by 4 people

  12. John Rawls says:

    mueller is the deep state fixer.

    his appearance in congress will likely be timed with IG report release.

    Like

  13. Hal_S says:

    I think the Whitehouse counsel should turn this around on them and run with it-:
    “Mr. Nadler, we have it on information and belief that the FBI and DOJ have already leaked many of these documents you request to the present and former Democratic members of the Judiciary Committee. Since you already HAVE the documents, there is no need for use to produce them for you. ”
    – “NOW, let’s start reviewing WHICH of these confidential documents were leaked to Democratic Congressional members. We’ll start by checking that laptop belonging to Debbie Wasserman Schultz…”

    Like

  14. Jim Comey is a weasel _Doug says:

    I’d tell Nadler to “eat me” but I’m afraid he’d take me literal and try to do it.
    Stick to donuts Jerry.

    Like

  15. Zippy says:

    Declassify everything NOW to totally nuke this Dim farce, ending it forever. Then start a New Church Committee to investigate this to the depth COINTELPRO was investigated.

    Like

    • lurker2 says:

      If I were Trump I’d save declassification for, say, August 2020. If Barr and Durham haven’t come up with anything substantial by that time, then declassify. Time it so that it has maximum impact on the election. August is post-convention for both parties and the chosen candidates are in the final head-to-head battle. It would be a perfect time to deal a knock-out blow.

      Like

  16. MelH says:

    Mueller won’t appear in Congress. He cut off his own feet with Volume 2. Such juvenile writing, and without a crime to obstruct, displays the Wissmann mind that is really an insult to Mueller.

    Liked by 3 people

  17. The Devilbat says:

    The question is, “who is Nadler working for.” He is old enough to have received training in the old Soviet Union the same as many labor leaders and future politicians and quite possibly – probably Obama. We do know this much, the democratic party has been taken over and is being run by communists. off that, there is no doubt. Many of the democratic lawmakers openly have close ties to a host of communist groups.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Dutchman says:

      Devilbat;
      The Republicon party leadership was also ‘taken over’ and is being run by Conmunists, as well.

      The Congressional Republicon leadership’s behavior, over many years, simply CAN NOT be explained away by “stupid” or gutless; its INTENTIONAL,
      its COMPLICIT.

      And it can’t be explained awsy by greed, either.

      Liked by 4 people

    • Ospreyzone says:

      Good question.

      Like

    • Your Tour Guide says:

      Read Horowitz’s “Fortunate Son”. New York
      state was full of red diaper baby neighborhoods
      around the time both he and Nadler were growing
      up. Nadler would not have had to travel far to
      become a fellow traveler.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Unapologetic American Male says:

      Soviet Union hell, why travel to Russia when you could attend The Little Red School House in NYC’s Greenwich Village or spend weeks/weekends at former resorts in the Catskills, the once heralded “Borscht Belt’, which had become Communist/Leftist training academies.

      Like

  18. Dman says:

    This looking into what happened by Barr may not have any teeth. Shocked but not surprised.

    Liked by 1 person

    • MustangBlues says:

      Cannot watch, nor listen to, gowdy and napolitano, both empty suits, back benchers, need to be traded to mexican cartels for pulque.

      Liked by 2 people

  19. MILupper says:

    AG Barr is nearly as big a troll of the left as PDJT. Siting former AG Janet Reno as writing the precedent for the decision is a slap in the face to Nipples High Nadler.

    Liked by 3 people

    • nimrodman says:

      Nipples High Nadler

      I immediately heard the beauty queen in sparkly evening gown in Casino, introducing the new TV show – “Aces High !!!”

      She was a looker – hey, just sayin’

      Like

  20. avi says:

    since Müller was only a figurehead, maybe Trump should have gone after and fired Weissmann and the other sociopaths

    Liked by 2 people

  21. Dan Dan says:

    Oldie but Goodie 😉

    Liked by 4 people

  22. Cassandra says:

    All this makes me wonder, are Mueller’s faculties intact? Mueller is appearing more and more like a front man (think fake western cowboy sets) who was used by the dirty lawless handpicked Weissmann team.

    If his thought process is impaired or he has a sword of Damocles hanging over him, he’d sink the deep state ship.

    Like

  23. DJT2020 says:

    This is where the unprecedented cooperation with the Special Counsel and innocence give Trump the moral high ground to say “Enough is enough.”

    Like

  24. Linus in W.PA. says:

    “…and in more clear words, Chairman Nadler,….F*ck off.”

    Like

  25. convert says:

    The Democrats are willing to burn it all down:. Violate every precedent, every policy and procedure, live like there’s no tomorrow. It’s quite amazing really. They are completely out of line.

    Liked by 3 people

  26. Unapologetic American Male says:

    I lived in the NY/NJ Metro Area for five plus decades, I’m 55 now Rep. Jerrold” ADL” Nadler is a exceptionally sleazy POS, not only is it rumored he’s a pedophile but he doesn’t hide his hate for Israel all while deploying his “Hebrew Shield” labeling everyone/anyone who criticizes him an “Anti-Semite”. How I wish the Mossad would reactivate the “sword of Gideon” and unburden us of that partisan pustule.

    Like

  27. GB Bari says:

    For several reasons that have already been exposed and discussed in previous weeks, I don’t trust McGahn would be discrete or entirely truthful. I am glad that the President has directed McGahn to not go to that hearing.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s