Do the Mueller Report Books Indicate Pending Release?…

There are three books titled around “The Mueller Report” with a publication date placeholder of March 26th, 2019.

The first book being sold on Amazon is authored by Robert S. Mueller III, with a prologue written by Alan Dershowitz.  The second book is from The Washington Post, also titled ‘The Mueller Report,’ and is authored by Rosalind S. Helderman and Matt Zapotosky.  The third similarly titled book is from a group of New York Times reporters.

The Amazon placeholder notes: “THE MARCH 26, 2019 PUBLICATION DATE IS A PLACEHOLDER. WE WILL PUBLISH OUR EDITION OF THE MUELLER REPORT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AFTER IT IS RELEASED TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC BY THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.”

While there is no other direct factual basis to predict the date of the Mueller Report being released, we can overlay some known calendar dates which would indicate an alignment.

Keeping in mind that everything the professional democrat apparatus does is generally planned in advance and strategized by a consortium of political operatives and leadership within the party; and accepting that Muelller’s team have most certainly been engaged in discussions with the political network; and overlaying the recent commentary from Nancy Pelosi; we can infer that at a certain point the March 26th release date was pre-planned.

Just like the Michael Cohen appearances were planned well in advance, and later shown to be heavily coordinated, scripted and controlled, we can note dates within the Pelosi rules would also have aligned with a late March release.

In December 2018, incoming House Speaker Pelosi tipped her hand to the schedule by changing the mandate for the House Oversight Committee, and giving Chairman Elijah Cummings until April 15th, 2019 to set up his congressional hearing calendar:

Those who travel the deep political weeds could reasonably infer the plan was for Cohen to go first, then Mueller with his report, then Cummings comes in with the schedule for hearings based from the two political predicates.

Of course, the Pelosi-Schumer plan was somewhat disrupted with the introduction and confirmation of AG William Barr.  Additionally, the Cohen roll-out didn’t go quite as planned because a few proactive House republicans started pointing out the duplicitous manipulation within the Cohen kickoff.

However, that said, at the 30,000 foot level we can identify the likely initial reason for the Mueller Report placeholder date of March 26, 2019.

Importantly, the shift in impeachment tone from Pelosi should be viewed as a change in tactics toward a pre-determined strategy, and not as a change in strategy itself.  Inside the timeline it’s likely Attorney General William Barr was a thorny disruption; a wrench in the machine per se’.

It is likely the Barr wrench changed the Pelosi tone, likely because the same wrench was identified as changing the con-structural tone of the Mueller report.  Outbound dispatches from within the Mueller team to their political allies, probably led to a moderate shift in tactics.

That said, any narrative impediment caused by Barr will likely only delay the distribution of the report insomuch as editorial review -and challenge- scrutinized the format.

Assuming the authors accept a necessary softening of harsh political verbiage and weaponized innuendo, there’s no reason to doubt the distribution date will change too much. Which brings our discussion to the third anticipated tripwire, the roll-out of ‘The Chosen One’.

Knowing The Chosen presidential candidate always launches from an inorganic baseline narrative established by the professional party machinery; the delivery of the anointed DNC candidate will likely wait until approximately a week after the Mueller report is presented.

Looking toward the political horizon there’s nothing else currently visible that can establish the candidate launch narrative other than The Mueller report.

The deadline for Chairman Cummings is hard: April 15th, 2019.  It is unlikely, albeit slightly possible, any extension would take place.  So keeping the theme of political  planning, the release of the Mueller report has to precede April 15th by enough time for Pelosi-Schumer and the Media to assist the framework of Cummings schedule.

Robert Mueller first, then a combination of the DNC Candidate and Elijah Cummings in sequence.  The latter two events (candidate and Cummings) are sequentially flexible depending on how the media responds to the primary event.

The likely sequence is:

  • Mueller, then
  • Cummings, then
  • Candidate.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in AG Bill Barr, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Donald Trump, Election 2020, Legislation, media bias, Nancy Pelosi, Notorious Liars, Occupy Type Moonbats, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

169 Responses to Do the Mueller Report Books Indicate Pending Release?…

  1. susanphd says:

    Thank you Sundance. It’s always fun to know their playbook well in advance.

    Liked by 12 people

  2. bertdilbert says:

    Strange that there are 3 books with the same title. Like they are going to flood the market space spin for the media to feed on.

    Liked by 5 people

    • Impossible says:

      Can’t copyright three things: Book titles, movie titles, and typeface designs.

      Liked by 2 people

    • grlangworth says:

      Several folks had the same bad idea.

      Liked by 3 people

    • SMP Belltown says:

      I’m not an expert on these things, but I’d guess that if Mueller has some sharp bizziness sense, he can start a blog called “The Mueller Report” and trademark the heck out of it. Then there would be a limit to any officially sanctioned books with a title called “The Mueller Report (TM)”. He could sell t-shirts and coffee mugs with the name brand on them, too, as well as Bobble heads and other ancillary merchandise. If Ruth Bader Ginsburg can get her own action figure, there should be plenty of people from the Russian Collusion investigation who deserve Funko cultural immortality. “The Mueller Report (TM)” website would be the perfect place to buy them.

      Liked by 2 people

    • PS says:

      Search Engine Optimization. These book titles will forever be mixed in with the general queries by the future public who will want to research this spaghetti mess of a coup. There are residual sales revenue opportunities for years here.

      Liked by 2 people

      • 1stgoblyn says:

        Because Mueller didn’t get rich enough from dragging out a bogus investigation long enough, he has to make even more by writing a book about it? Why would people spend money on a book when they can read all the same information from his report when it is released?

        Liked by 3 people

  3. saywhat64 says:

    POTUS Trump has some pretty good monkey wrenches ready to throw into the Pelosi/DNC machinations. And then comes the debates, Oh what a show that should be.

    Liked by 5 people

  4. saywhat64 says:

    I’m confounded.

    Who the heck will be the “chosen” candidate?

    Like

  5. Todd says:

    So the candidate is Biden?

    Liked by 1 person

    • sundance says:

      A combination of Joe Biden and Stacy Abrams is plausible.

      One of the key aspects to think about the DNC party plan is to consider is how each candidate would fall and endorse in a pre-determined primary sequence toward a pre-determined outcome.

      When the GOP planned 2016 (in 2014) Lindsey was supposed to drop and endorse Jeb after S-Carolina; Marco was supposed to drop and endorse Jeb after Florida. etc.

      [Of course that plan was blown up by DJT]

      Liked by 21 people

      • bertdilbert says:

        Since SD has educated me on the rigged splitter strategy, I will never again donate money in a primary.

        Liked by 3 people

        • Dekester says:

          BD, Since Sundance educated me period, I will never again support any political party.

          The whole Uniparty/ Splitter strategy I can now see is used in many Western Democracies.

          Fascinating too, to see how Merkel, Macron, May, the guy in Australia, and our numbskull up ere in Canada. All worshiped your P44. and despise your President.

          Thanks to all you CTH supporters.

          God bless PDJT

          Liked by 28 people

          • Michael Todaro says:

            Yes Dekester ! MAGA/KAG !

            Liked by 1 person

          • Dekester I’m looking at 60, always voted, and until now I never voted for an R or a D for President. Trump is the first person to call out their BS.

            There’s a lot of industrious Canadians who build things, add value to resources and create technological innovations. Too bad you can’t get a government that understands it needs to get out of the way and trust your citizens to make it all a better place.

            Like

          • Dekester I’m looking at 60, always voted, and until now I never voted for an R or a D for President. Trump is the first person to call out their BS.

            There’s a lot of industrious Canadians who build things, add value to resources and create technological innovations. Too bad you can’t get a government that understands it needs to get out of the way and trust your citizens to make it all a better place.

            Like

      • The Devilbat says:

        I cannot even imagine Biden ever having a chance against Trump. Neither is the idea of running Michael Obama as the first transgender president a very bright idea. The democrats would seem to be at a loss for a serious contender.

        Liked by 1 person

      • jello333 says:

        Yeah, I think if Biden had been the Dem candidate in 2016, he would have made things tougher for Trump in the rust-belt states. He still might if he runs, but I think Trump’s support has actually solidified, so I’m not as worried. And if he picks someone like Abrams, I’m even less worried. Now the one person he could pick that MIGHT cause me some concern is Tulsi Gabbard. Just the fact that she doesn’t seem to be afflicted with terminal TDS sets her apart some. But that’s also the reason I think her heart would NOT be totally into all-out war against Trump, so Biden may not want someone like that.

        Like

        • Maquis says:

          She’s the only potential Demon candidate of either gender that doesn’t immediately induce vomiting.

          Liked by 3 people

        • jessetmims says:

          Not that it would matter to the Democrats; but, Tulsi Gabbard cannot legally serve as either president or vice president. She was born on Tutuila, the main island of American Samoa. Therefore, she is not a natural born citizen (the definition of natural born citizen of the USA is “one born on US soil to two US citizen parents”).

          American Samoa is an unincorporated territory of the United States; and therefore, not considered to be US soil for purposes of US citizenship. However, US naturalization law allows children born in unincorporated US territories to be US citizens (only) if at least one parent is a US citizen at the time the child is born.

          NO child not born on US soil can become a US citizen except via some form of US naturalization law. Therefore, such children are naturalized US citizens; and, NO naturalized citizen is Constitutionally eligible to be president or vice president.

          Like

          • brenrod says:

            derivative citizenship is not legally considered to be naturalization. One does not get naturalized, one merely has to produce evidence meeting derivative citizenship criteria to get the USA passport.

            Like

            • jessetmims says:

              @ brenrod… Re “derivative citizenship is not legally considered to be naturalization.”

              Soooo…. why is it that the only way to attain derivative citizenship is via NATURALIZATION LAW?

              Like

      • concerned3 says:

        Well it’s either run for President or the nursing home, right Joe.

        Liked by 1 person

      • The Boss says:

        The Biden candidacy fits the timeline, wherein he previously said he’d announce his decision “around the end of March”.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Maquis says:

        Biden and Abrams? Sure, one brings faux gravitas, the other brings genuine gravity.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Flight93Gal says:

        Sundance, this is very plausible and somewhat likely.

        Abrams is deciding at end of March 2019 whether she runs for the GA Senate against Perdue. Of course, she may not.

        Instead, she may opt to run for the Presidency at that time and she does this not to win but to position for VP . She claims to have policy “chops”–both domestic and foreign, and also claims that as an attorney and former congress critter, she has exceptional political and articulation skills and can appeal to a significant majority of the “voting rights deprived” and “continually repressed” black vote.

        Therefore, Joe positions for the white moderates and the cross over Independents and Abrams positions for a majority of the black vote.

        Their strategy is somewhat solid and our POTUS (a/k/a VSGPDJT) has his and OUR re-election work cut out for us!

        Liked by 1 person

    • Grassleysgirl/Breitbartista says:

      Or both?
      2008 Candidates, only the top of the ticket is flipped..
      Bidet/Obamett💃💪 .
      Of course their alternate dream green team is standing at the ready.
      Camilla/Spanish Signer.

      Like

  6. anthohmy says:

    I wouldn’t mind seeing them ride around the block on a bus again.

    Liked by 4 people

  7. livefreeordieguy says:

    I didn’t realize ‘The Chosen One’ had to be rolled out so soon… I’ve been thinking Michelle all along, eventually… Female, check… black, check… name recognition, 100%… autobiography on the shelves, check… celebrity status, check… social justice warrior, check… AND they get BHO back in the WH — every Moonbat’s dream… But I don’t see MO being unveiled within that timeline… So, maybe Michelle is an ‘insurance policy’ for ‘The Chosen One’… If he/she flames out, then Michelle can ride in to save the day… If not, Michelle can just stay on Geffen’s yacht… We know how the Moonbats love ‘insurance policies’….

    Liked by 3 people

    • The Devilbat says:

      Thats until Michael Robinson’s medical records are released and the public find out for sure that he was born a man and still is a man.

      Liked by 5 people

      • nimrodman says:

        May not be as fatal as one might think
        Look at the (alleged) acceptance and fawning over Bruce Jenner, Rev 2

        (by the way, is he still got his schvannztigger? or had it whacked?)

        Like

        • betseyross says:

          Whacked!

          Like

          • tarheel69 says:

            I’m remember a few years back watching the Kardashians and Bruce was still a man giving good solid advice to his young daughters no drama at all now Katelyn Sence getting her thing whacked off has turned into a complete drama queen he for sure now acts like a woman the ones that have mental issues ..

            Liked by 1 person

  8. concerned3 says:

    Question: If President Trump declassifies the documents right after the Mueller report release. Would this not destroy the Pelosi Plan?

    Liked by 4 people

    • YEP…The DEVIL is in the details and PDJT’s documents, UNREDACTED, will cause MUCH CONSTERNATION!!!…

      Do Not EVER FORGET—>>> THIS IS A FIGHT FOR OUR COUNTRY…WE HAVE TO WIN THIS FIGHT TO COMPLETELY DESTROY THE DEMS, ENABLERS, SHAM ARTISTS, etc…AND also the Repubs CoC, LOBBYISTS and outside influences to the sitting congcritters…

      PDJT is going to make EVERYONE wish that they had supported MAGA…

      Liked by 3 people

    • thedoc00 says:

      The President releasing the documents will cause consternation among the DNC and RNC as there are allot of dirty actors from both parties involved. Could be the reason the RNC has decided on no primary and release would also leave the 2020 congressional races in an extremely high state of flux.

      The declassification has the potential of being a nuclear weapon like the Old Davy Crockett recoilless gun , with a bursting radius larger than its maximum effective range.

      Liked by 2 people

  9. Me says:

    Why are they selling these books? Just download the report and read it for free when it’s made available. And if you need someone to edit it for you, then why bother at all? Maybe they’ll concoct a version suitable for twitter.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Rynn69 says:

    Not going to waste money on fiction. If you want to read the truth, purchase Sidney Powell’s “Licensed to Lie.”

    Liked by 15 people

  11. bessie2003 says:

    So what if Barr decides to not release the report?

    Or to only allow a brief boned summary to be released, assuming that it is still the practice to not release detailed information on a person, or persons, where no charges are gong to be filed?

    Would even a delay of releasing any report put a monkey wrench in their plans?

    Like

    • Grassleysgirl/Breitbartista says:

      What makes you think the DS doesn’t have a copy already?
      Hand delivered by the same pitbull who exchanged previous pages of the dooooosier?

      Liked by 2 people

      • donna kovacevic says:

        Someone please educate me, how is it possible to have a book of Muellers report ready to roll when the report has not been completed. America is showing the goofy circus it has become. Look at the taxpayers money gone to Bozo M and his clowns, for what?? I don’t get the stupidity that has occurred. God Bless PDJT!

        Like

        • Maquis says:

          It’s not ready to roll, only the cover images exist for certain. The date’s the thing.

          Liked by 1 person

        • Krashman Von Stinkputin says:

          Look familiar?

          Like

          • B Woodward says:

            Yeah, the so-called “9/11 Commission’s “Full and Complete Account of the Circumstances Surrounding the September 11, 2001 Terrorist Attacks.” But the report only mentions Building 7 as a footnote. It fails to state that all 83 steel columns failed at once and Building 7 fell like a controlled demolition in 6.5 seconds into a pile of rubble.

            President Trump said, “First of all, the original 9-11 investigation is a total mess and has to be reopened. How do 2 planes take out 3 buildings in the same day?” “I never got my head around the fact that nothing is mentioned about the destruction of Building 7 in the 585-page document.” Trump said 9-11 was not properly investigated and vowed to get to the bottom of it. I personally believe that is one of the reasons that the Bush family had to stop Trump from being elected–and one of the unspoken reasons that certain people want him to be impeached now.
            http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/561076/donald-trump-9-11-investigation-terror-attack-revolution

            Like

      • bessie2003 says:

        My assumption is that it is still against the law to leak documents from the FBI or DOJ; but

        I’ve made lots of assumptions about how honest govt law enforcement is over the years, so could be wrong,

        Like

    • farrier105 says:

      Barr could stall the release until after the election. Think of the reaction of the machine to that.

      Liked by 2 people

  12. Tl Howard says:

    Call me confused. Do we really know that Barr is going to okay the release of ALL of the damned thing?

    Does our POTUS actually know what insinuations, what red meat, raw or not, is in the damned thing that he says, “Release it all?”

    Like

  13. chojun says:

    Recall that the special counsel act requires/allows the AG to prepare the report that is released to Congress and the public.

    The report released by Barr will be the Mueller report. The DOJ would be establishing a horribly dangerous precedent by releasing investigative information on individuals not indicted or charged.

    President Trump is playing them like a fiddle by suggesting that the entire report be released. He said ‘game’ – they’re all playing his game and he’s deceived them into thinking he’s playing their game.

    Trump is way too damned smart for these people in Congress.

    Liked by 3 people

    • chojun says:

      By way of clarification – the report released by Barr will be *called* or *considered* the Mueller report, although it will be a distilled version of that report. The actual raw, original report delivered from the Mueller office to Barr will likely never be released, or at least not for 50 years.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Krashman Von Stinkputin says:

        Agree chojun….28 CFR 600 is quite clear.

        Trump is setting up the political justification for releasing ALL material.
        In other words…..Declassification.

        Politically it will be harder for him to justify declassification without releasing as much of the “Mueller Report” as legally possible.

        Hard for Dems to make a “transparency” claim to illegally justify release of Mueller Report while simultaneously protesting legal declassification by President. Oh they may try to do it (remember the Nunes memo splodey heads) but this time it won’t work.

        The recent release of depositions—full of key “Russia” witness contradictions is the set up for this. And more are coming.

        Granny Graham’s Senate Judiciary Committee will welcome declassification.

        “All means ALL” will be Trump’s trump.

        Liked by 2 people

    • i'm just sayin'.. says:

      preparing the battlefield…..

      Like

  14. Tl Howard says:

    And… Stacy EFFING Abrams? Wouldn’t it help if they got someone who actually had more experience than being a minority lead in the Georgia House? Egads. A heartbeat away, no experience in business? Not someone who has travelled the world? A woman who was a poor loser.

    Liked by 5 people

  15. Sayit2016 says:

    I saw the ” Mueller Report” on Amazon a few weeks ago and wondered on the release date… Has this been done before by Amazon roll out on an SC Investigation ? I came to the obvious conclusion it would be on that or around that date…so to me it seems the report is already done
    except for maybe editing…

    If I was Mueller I would be embarrassed to put my name on report…it’s going to be an interesting year.

    Like

  16. concerned3 says:

    Will President Trump’s release of the declassified documents be the political equal on the Socialist of our firebombing of Tokyo at the end of WWII?

    Tokyo WWII firebombing, the single most deadly bombing raid in history

    It is considered the single most deadly bombing raid in history.
    Seventy years ago, US forces firebombed Tokyo to force the Japanese to an early surrender in the dying months of World War II.
    The atomic bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki have dominated the retelling of WWII history, but as a single attack the bombing of Tokyo was more destructive.
    The firestorms killed about 100,000 civilians and wiped out about half of the city.

    Liked by 2 people

  17. Mike says:

    The report could be sent to the AG tomorrow and it would still take more than a month to release it. The AG has to review it and then send it to the WH for comment and a rebuttal. Security will play a role in what can be released. No way the report is released publicly on March 26.

    Liked by 1 person

  18. AZ18 says:

    Thinking outside the box…Oprah (has the media/people skills) and Snowwoman Amy (she’s the bad ass, tough politician).

    Like

  19. emeraldcoaster says:

    I’d be pleasantly surprised if AG Barr took his sweet time reviewing the entire tenure of Mueller’s Special Counsel, to include questionable prosecutoral actions by Weissmann et al.

    Like

  20. The Boss says:

    Maybe if Mueller hadn’t been “authoring” a book about his investigation he’d have wrapped up some time ago. Of course, a lucrative book deal is a great way to get paid off.

    Liked by 1 person

  21. StillHere says:

    So The Mueller Report is going to say what the actual report “can’t” state. “Trump Is scum and deserves to be indicted and he is a rotten pos.” And the all want a “piece” for saying this.

    Like

    • JohninMK says:

      Quoting from the books and the actual report is a pretty good way of muddying the waters.

      Like

    • meow4me2 says:

      Bingo, yes, they will use it to say what Barr will not let them say. But they can’t provide too much evidence beyond what he allows without running afoul of the law themselves, can they? So mainly, innuendo and “trust us, the evidence exists, just being suppressed by AG” … typical partisan BS.

      Like

  22. getfitnow says:

    I don’t care who their nominee is. But can you imagine POTUS ticking off accomplishment after accomplishment – foreign and domestic including bringing hostages and remains home vs Michelle trying to tout her expensive, failed Let’s Move program?

    Liked by 1 person

    • 1stgoblyn says:

      If their candidate is Moochelle there will be ad after ad of things she said while living in Our House. Starting with the “this is the first time in my life I have been proud of my country” to “I can’t wait to leave this building, it’s like a prison” and including those like “Barack will make you get a job” (what a joke that one was), “We have to change our history, our culture…”, “…someone has to give up their share of the pie to give to someone else.” All paraphrased, in case anyone was wondering. I would love to see them run her. It will be so much fun.

      Like

  23. Ken Maritch says:

    I think if Michelle Obama ends of being “the chosen one” the Democrats will find a reason to not hold any presidential debates.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. Ken Maritch says:

    I think if Michelle Obama ends of being “the chosen one” the Democrats will find a reason to not hold any presidential debates.

    Like

  25. Ken Maritch says:

    I think if Michelle Obama ends of being “the chosen one” the Democrats will find a reason to not hold any presidential debates.

    Liked by 1 person

  26. georgehumphries9802 says:

    Sundance, brilliant use of the hyphen in “con-structural tone of the Mueller report”

    Liked by 2 people

  27. Sunsettommy says:

    If the Mueller report is shown to be a dud, then all of their political Bullcrap will quickly collapse because most people will then ignore anymore fatuous claims against DJT, after all hearing and reading their two year incessant attacks that produce nothing, is a signal that they have NOTHING!.

    I regret not voting for Trump the first time around, will not repeat that mistake for 2020!

    Liked by 1 person

  28. snellvillebob says:

    I will remember this every time the Left accuses our President Trump of winging it.

    Like

  29. convert says:

    I am genuinely puzzled as to who the chosen one could be for the Dems? Michelle seems far fetched to me because she has never shown any interest in working hard and has no real accomplishment in her life? But I totally believe she could possibly win if she runs because the media would sanctify and deify her and women would flock to her. As dumbed down as Americans are, they might actually vote her in. It’s terrifying.

    Like

    • snellvillebob says:

      Stacey Adams almost won in the Governorship in the 2018 Georgia elections. She is a very practiced speech maker, black, female and fat. This makes her a quadruple threat so I would not count her out. They gave her a test run when she did the rebuttal of our President Trumps State of the Union address.

      Like

    • 1stgoblyn says:

      Only if fraud is involved.

      Liked by 1 person

  30. L. E. Joiner says:

    William Barr has not committed to releasing any part of Mueller’s report, and by DoJ rules, he doesn’t have to. It will be interesting to see if he does.

    Re the Chosen Candidate, I’ll repeat my prediction from a couple of days ago:

    Joe Biden will announce in April, to great media fanfare. He is the Anointed One, as he could not run in 2016 because of the death of his son, and so the Party owes it to him. He is also Much Loved, and none of the whacky socialists will dare to criticize him. He’ll have the pick of them for VP. My guess is he’ll choose Kamala Harris, who has the temperament of a rabid pit-bull, just right for a VP candidate. Probably not Miz Abrams, who (judging from her SOTU-answer speech) has the personality (and appearance) of a mushroom. /LEJ

    Liked by 1 person

    • i'm just sayin'.. says:

      Joe ‘Handy Man” Biden also brings to the table enough gravitas and loose cannon style to, at least temporarily for a time, send AOC and her ilk to their rooms so that the disintegration of the “traditional” Dimmocrat party is slowed. This slowing may be their biggest priority as they have no hope of winning in 2020.

      Like

    • AmericaFirst says:

      Can’t think of him as candidate without remembering Clint Eastwood’s great speech: “Biden? The intellectual of the Democrats,” said with much sarcasm. And naturally everybody laughed because … well, it IS laughable.

      After the canonization of the pot-head, self-acknowledged lazy, anti-American who was a freshman senator, having won his post by dirty tricks, with a background as purely a race baiter, and still technically an Indonesian citizen after having been adopted by his step-father and made a citizen, who was utterly incapable of public speaking without a TelePrompTer, I simply can’t discount any possibility no matter how seemingly ridiculous.

      Like

  31. John says:

    Seeing how the liberal base now hates Clinton (mainly because she lost to Trump), she’s out. Biden won’t be much better and he’s going to be creepy Joe, the time Trump is done with him. Michelle Obama probably likes her life back after 8 years.

    I would expect Abrams and Biden to both announce.

    Biden is going to be an attempt to persuade White Men to go back to the Dem party.
    Abrams is going to be an attempt to persuade more White Women to vote for the Dem Party.

    Like

    • 1stgoblyn says:

      Abrams will run, but not for President. She needs some more experience in politics (she does have some telling tales) so she will run for the Senate. IMHO

      Like

  32. mtk says:

    Hmmm… Three books.
    Most likely the political equalivant of three card monty.
    Just watch how Cummings will easily slip between the pages. And with the shuffle of his factoids on the table, watch how he will disappear into the bindings of two out of the three that are one sided sourced narratives.

    After a few rounds of this, fact, fiction and opinion will be so blurry that the one central question will have been effectively removed from the table.

    Did the FBI/DOJ enable a politically motivated hatchet job on incomming President.

    Like

  33. SpotTheSpook says:

    So the way I see it, DJT has until April 15th to rid congress of a few key members.

    Like

  34. Rob says:

    These books remind one of “The White House Transcripts”, also by the NY Slimes and I believe Wapo. But back then, there were no .pdf files to download.
    Surely it’s not going to be necessary to PAY for this bilge?

    Like

  35. chickenhawk says:

    I may be wrong here….
    But if Pres. Trump maintains his high poll numbers, and the Dems don’t impeach, then
    the Dem candidate we have been waiting for may wait until 2024 so as not to be tarnished with a loss to the incumbent.

    Like

  36. penny munday says:

    Ah, the Mueller Report–>lawfare at its best. Remember Concord Management? Innuendo is the basis for crimes. It’s what Weissman, veteran of Ted Stevens, Enron and Arthur Andersen trials, does best, aided and abetted by the judicial system.

    So what has happened to Concord Management trial: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jan/1/eric-dubelier-emerges-robert-muellers-top-courtroo/

    The defense attorneys for Concord have done an excelllent job of exposing the ineptness, and imo downright illegality, of the Mueller case. Unfortunately, it might take an appeals court to overturn convictions as it did in prior AAW cases.

    The Mueller Report will be used only as fuel for the media firestorm. Bet the bank on that. There is nothing of substance in it.

    Liked by 1 person

  37. lawton says:

    Going by the media’s activities Harris and Biden are the candidates they are actively assisting as of right now why they are actively going after Sanders and Beto and are pretty much neutral to the rest right now except Gabbard.

    Liked by 1 person

  38. My opinion as a novice is the Dem’s “chosen” one has not been chosen yet. I believe the Dems will stay in a state of disarray until Pelosi permanently neuters the far left wing in the House and the Mueller report is released and AG Barr’s report is made public. The Dems can’t run on the economy so they must run on an “anti-Trump” agenda. If AG Barr’s report clearly exonerates PDJT and AG Barr concurrently starts prosecuting corrupt FBI/DOJ players then the ballgame is over for the Dems. Their 2020 candidates will be sacrificial lambs.

    Liked by 1 person

  39. dwpender says:

    I note the Amazon item says “960” pages. Another “placeholder”? I also see the WAPO version says 720 pages, and the DOJ says 171 (both also “available” on Amazon). I wonder if the Dershowitz introduction has already been written — report unseen (odd, to say the least).

    Like

  40. I think I’ll stick to the free copy that will be made available to the taxpayers who already paid dearly for it, should Barr even release it. Just the facts, thank you. LOL

    Oh, and the chosen one is most likely Kamala Toe Harris. You may recall, she got Queen Hillary’s blessing.

    Like

  41. Linus in W.PA. says:

    So Beto is not the chosen one then??

    I think the dems know that whoever runs is going to lose.

    Like

  42. lotbusyexec says:

    One of my “favorite” books when I was a teenager was a book we found at a tag sale and it was called “Sex After 60” . My brother and I couldn’t wait to open it to find out what sex after 60 was. When we opened it, it was nothing but blank pages. We had a good laugh. Hoping that Meuller’s report is the same – a real dud filled with blanks.

    Like

  43. James F says:

    It will be intersting to see if Dershowitz was playing the long con and will state something like “for the past few years, I have been giving an honest assessment based on the information that was available to the public. But now that I have seen all of the evidence, it was clearly not a witch hunt after all and there are definite grounds for impeachment,”

    Like

    • James F says:

      This is what I meant by “long con” for those of you who might not be familiar with the term.

      A con-job that requires a certain amount of effort and as a namesake, is usually in it for the long haul. Gaining someone’s trust for a number of months and then when the stake is in your court and you have their complete trust–taking advantage of it. Usually denotes relationship status or high-level business partnerships.
      https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=long%20con

      Like

  44. Zorro says:

    Announcement of release date 3/19. Imo.

    Biden/Abrahams depends on Uncle Joe’s assessment of if Socialist Stacey is “clean and articulate”.

    Like

  45. DezKingston says:

    Another nothing burger

    Like

  46. Doug Amos says:

    Michael or Rocky; either way, more Obama. Does Barr have to accept or reject Meuller’s garbage or can he just confirm it was received and leave it at that?

    Like

  47. I think it is generally understood in our MAGA orbit that Mueller was selected for this job by his team, he did not select the team that is trying to hide its own crimes. He is compromised and perhaps he took a job he was not allowed to say no to. Yet, he also knows that he has nothing on Trump. And we now see that some things (Paige, Strzok – a la Rep. Doug Collins) coming out. If Trump starts to declassify right after the Mueller report is out – which he can without obstruction charges, then Mueller has some ‘splainin to do. (Perhaps this is what Hannity was referring to last week.) Mueller won’t want any part of having to defend the Obama FBI/DOJ. Mueller left the FBI before the 2016 election in September 2013. He will be able to turn around and say they lied to ME. And then he walks away from the whole thing – unless he gets stuck in the scope memo controversy or some other Rosenstein crime.

    Then we head into 2020 with all the ammo we need, Lindsey Graham investigating the whole charade from his Senate Committee, a booming economy for Main Street, and a SJW opponent that will make everyone with half a brain cringe.

    MAGA!

    Liked by 1 person

  48. Carolyn says:

    Alan Dershowitz is actually using the full Mueller report, hence the reason the book says written by Mueller, and Dershowitz has done the forward I believe.

    Like

  49. zucccchini says:

    I still say there will be no Mueller report until something happens either by sheer chance or manufactured that absolutely sucks all the oxygen from the airwaves but that..for at least a week or more. Then and only then will the 25 million dollar PLUS report that found nothing…but still looking, heavily redacted and insinuation heavy be revealed……that’s if it is rolled out at all.

    Like

  50. brenrod says:

    I expect the mueller writing an analysis of his own report will see folks quoting his analysis rather than the actual report… as his analysis will consist primarily of his propaganda. In that way folks will say “the mueller report proved this…. and that….” which makes for solid revisionism.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s