Democrat House Oversight Subcommittee Schedules Hearing on Climate Change, Democrats Don’t Show Up…

You can’t make this stuff up if you tried.  All we ever needed to know about the purely political use of ‘climate change’ as a manufactured tool for electoral votes is visible in this one moment.  Democrats, led by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the Green New Deal, have been claiming the world will end in twelve years if Climate Change is not addressed.

To highlight their commitment to the urgent need, Speaker Nancy Pelosi created a House subcommittee dedicated to selling the need for the Green New Deal.  To reinforce the urgency, the new House Oversight Subcommittee scheduled a hearing with the intent to target climate change deniers called: “The Denial Playbook”.   The hearing was today.

A panel was set to deliver testimonials and statements to advance the priorities of the Democrat congressional team selling the Green New Deal; except, well, the majority Democrats ran into a problem…. they didn’t show up for the hearing.

According to the position of Democrats and the GND supporters, the world is ending in less than twelve years.  Yet, no-one shows up for their Climate Change hearing?

With only two democrats showing up for the hearing; and highlighting the fraud that surrounds the entire premise of the effort; and with four sub-committee republicans who did show up, outnumbering the Democrat majority; ranking minority member Louie Gohmert made a motion to adjourn.  The adjournment motion passed 4 votes to 2 and the hearing was adjourned. WATCH BELOW:

The full video below.  [Prompted, just hit play]


This entry was posted in Big Stupid Government, Dem Hypocrisy, Election 2020, Environmentalism, Glo-Bull Warming, Legislation, Occupy Type Moonbats, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

155 Responses to Democrat House Oversight Subcommittee Schedules Hearing on Climate Change, Democrats Don’t Show Up…

  1. Genie says:

    Reminds me a little of the Animal House hearing.

    Liked by 3 people

  2. The attached article shows how the “Climate Change lobby” continues to lie by resetting temperature records.

    Liked by 3 people

  3. simicharmed says:

    I want/need/demand one of the Climate-Change-Folk(s) to state and describe EVERY volcano that is erupting/emitting/etc. on the the planet annually (land, under ocean etc.). Over the past 200 years to present.

    Better yet (and also)…provide what is emitted the past 30 years from just land volcanic eruptions worldwide.

    Once that legitimate date can be produced and verified. I will require that data be produced as to how much CO2 and ANY other “hazardous” gas/element has been and is being emitted into the environment from Earths Natural behavior(s).

    Once I (we) can obtain such required data….well…then we can begin any legitimate discussion if “mankind” and their needs of burning fossil fuels makes any difference whatsoever.

    Liked by 3 people

    • montanamel says:

      Cut to the chase:
      Demand that they detail what was ejected and then circulated planet wide by “TAMBORA”.

      It was only the “largest single” contemporary eruption – ie: in the last millennium.

      It also is credited with causing at least 50% of the deepness of The Little Ice Age all by itself…perhaps even more…but, that’s enough to scare hell out of anyone with brains between their ears…

      And…this meeting happens on the day that the headlines proclaim that this FEBUARY is the COLDEST in the last 83 years!… Stick a fork in that global warming “tootsie roll” as it floats by… Check-6

      Liked by 6 people

      • simicharmed says:

        All-in-all. Volcanic emissions alone annually clearly eclipse a fraction of what mankind could ever produce to “destroy” the planet. Rather ridiculous that any human being could “lack of candor” when blaming mankind for ANY affect of Planet Earth.

        Liked by 4 people

      • Newton Love says:

        The current solar cycle is very weak. Sunspots have been missing for almost an entire year, indicating a quiescent sun, meaning less radiated heat. Combined with where Earth is in the Milosevec Cycle, we are primed for a repeat of the Dalton Minimum, which was the cause of “the little ice age” when Washington was able to haul cannon across the frozen Potomac river to attack a British fort.

        I’m a scientist, and I agree with many other skeptics, that at least the next decade, if not the next 30 years, will be significantly colder. (But NOAA and HADCRUT will still cook the books to say that it is getting warmer.) The satellite data shows that temps have been declining for over a decade. It’s going to get colder, too.

        Liked by 4 people

        • Well, not likely.

          I am also a scientist, an independent physicist (meaning unconnected and on my own, for the past 25 years; I am 70 now). I did the widely known (and just as widely ignored or vehemently dismissed) Venus/Earth temperatures comparison back in November 2010

          That comparison utilized the Standard Atmosphere model of the Earth’s atmosphere. And it precisely — precisely — confirmed that model as the true representative state of both the Earth troposphere and the Venus atmosphere (over the same pressure range as Earth’s troposphere), with the latter’s temperatures only corrected for the different distance of Venus from the Sun. This not only disproves the carbon dioxide “greenhouse effect” (since Venus has over 2400 times the concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide as does Earth), but it shows there can be no substantial global warming OR cooling — the Standard Atmosphere model is a static model, unchanging and known for over a century; yet it agrees precisely with the Venus temperature profile in 1991, showing there can have been no global warming over the last century, despite the supposedly accurate global temperature records of the climate scientists). So my Venus/Earth comparison indicates the global temperature records are inaccurate in showing global warming.

          That has been independently confirmed by those who have found biased adjustments in the temperature records, and even blatant fraud. Even I have done so:

          Further, looking at both the temperatures over the last 10,000 years, and the solar irradiance since 1611, shows that global mean surface temperature has been stable to within about half a degree above and below the long-term mean, and that the incident solar energy has been stable to within about 0.12% above and below its average. These levels of stability are consistent with one another, for as I showed in the second link above, the temperature should change by the same percentage as the incident energy changes (by the equipartition theorem of statistical mechanics). A 0.12% variation in the incoming solar should cause the same variation in the temperature, and with a mean surface temperature of 288K, in the precisely confirmed Standard Atmosphere model, that would be a 0..35 degree change in temperature, close to the half a degree seen in long-term temperature plots.

          The upshot is there is no valid climate science today (no carbon dioxide “greenhouse effect”, no “radiation forcings” of temperature…and even no “multidecadal ocean oscillations” valid explanation, for that non-existent warming), and no competent climate scientists, even among the global warming skeptics. There has been no global warming (beyond the long-term mean variation of one-half of a degree C, or K), nor any substantial global cooling (no naturally occurring global “ice ages”). The atmosphere, and the Sun’s output, are both just too stable to allow either.

          Liked by 4 people

          • Newton Love says:

            Nice post, but you cover only the last 10,000 years, basically the current interglacial period, since the last ice age ended.

            You worry me with ‘(no naturally occurring global “ice ages”)’ when geologists have shown evidence (glacial moraines, et cetera) that there have been several Ice Ages:
            the Huronian glaciation lasted 300 million years
            the Cryogenian glaciation lasted 85 million years
            the Andean-Saharan glaciation lasted 30 million years
            the Late Paleozoic ice age lasted 75 million years
            the Quaternary glaciation lasted 2.7 million years

            In between the Ice Ages were warm Inter-Glacial periods, which average about 10,000 years in length. The current Inter-Glacial that we are living in is (so far) 11,700 years in length. How long until the next Ice Age starts, I don’t know, but it could be soon.

            I wonder if you are asserting that the Maunder and Dalton Minimums did not occur, since you state that there was no significant variation of temperature in the 10,000 years that you studied, which includes the Maunder and Dalton Minimum events.

            Liked by 2 people

    • Dutchman says:

      Start down that road, you can make the argument that its NOT ‘man-made’ climate change, the earth is just trying to commit suicide.

      Actually, I think we ought to really get behind this whole chicken little, we only have 12 years thing,..Golgafachian style.

      We build these Yuge spaceships, with massive cargo holds full of hybernation pods. We will build and launch 3 fleets, and load and launch as they are completed.

      The first fleet will be all the lawyers, lobbyists, beurocrats and the whole Davos crowd. After all, they will be the ‘first’to arrive, and since they are people who like to run things, they can get everything running, before the *wink wink* “other” ships arrive.

      Oh, and throw in all the Hollywood types, to keep everyone entertained.

      Launch it across the Universe, and say “good riddance”, worth every penny to get rid of those bloodsuckers!

      Liked by 9 people

      • simicharmed says:

        In absolute essence….Mankind has ZERO effect on the planet.

        The Planet has been through a lot worse than us – “it’s Been through earthquakes, volcanoes, plate tectonics, continental drifts, solar flares, sun spots, magnetic storms, the magnetic reversal of the poles”…

        “Hundreds of thousands of years of bombardment by comets and asteroids, and meteors, world-wide floods, tidal waves, world-wide fires, erosion, cosmic waves and recurring ice-ages”.

        George Carlin said it best above plus the encore – The Planet isn’t going anywhere….WE ARE!

        Liked by 5 people

      • Incisor says:

        I do believe that Dutchman is on to a BRILLIANT idea!!!

        Liked by 1 person

      • redline says:

        It doesn’t actually have to *be* a spaceship, as long as the “passengers” believe it is, and believe further that the success of their voyage depends on their keeping every hatch secured for the next, oh, let’s say, eighty or eighty-five years.

        News broadcasts for their particular confirmative needs could be manufactured and fed into their networks, providing continuous, gratifying, “proof” of the correctness of their decision.

        Liked by 1 person

        • montanamel says:

          Just knock ’em all in the head and use their remains for road-grade fill…
          It’s that, or, shark bait….would hate to see our oceans after 4 million sharks upchuck!


  4. Dudley says:

    Simply ask a climate change advocate what the ideal level should be for carbon dioxide. You will get a blank stare. Ask them if carbon dioxide should be completely eliminated from the atmosphere. You will probably get a few yeses. Simply ask them what the present atmospheric level is for carbon dioxide. Many don’t know. Usually you only get to ask one of these questions and then they stop playing. It is a fun game while it lasts.

    Liked by 4 people

  5. Maquis says:

    Apocalypse Barbie gots some ‘splaining to do.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Dee Paul Deje says:


  7. Kerry_On says:

    When (IF) this fiasco hearing is reopened, I would like one of the Republicans to read into the record, the litany of similar predictions of apocalyptic ecological disasters that have already come and gone with no noticeable detrimental effects on the planet. Considering the incredible volume of such failed predictions and the fact that we only have 12 years to complete the entry of them into the official record, I think we best get started ASAP. Additionally, I would remind the intellectually-challenged Representative Ocasio-Cortez of the famous quote by Niels Bohr…”Prediction is very difficult, especially if it’s about the future”.

    Liked by 2 people

  8. Jim says:

    I like how Mr. Cox still rushes to judgement (incorrect at that) on the role call. It is so natural to him to lie. His no vote was barely out of his mouth before indicating the vote was no. Despicable.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. EricStoner says:

    Do they have an official “Scarlet D” for a denier to wear?

    SNL, Judge from Witch Trial – SNL – Witch Trial – Prosecutor’s Opening Statement

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Louisiana Tea Rose says:

    Luv me that lil Bullwinkle thang goin on up thar…


    Liked by 1 person

  11. Doug Haggard says:


    Tongue tied and Twisted, just an Earth bound misfit……. I 

    HHC, 1st BDE (Aviation Platoon) Flying-Circus Scouts, 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile), Republic of Vietnam 1968-69


  12. desertspeaks says:

    dems will inevitably do what they always do, just pass legislation that no one will be allowed to read,. they’ll find out whats in it after it’s passed! WHERE HAVE WE SEEN THIS TRICK BEFORE?

    Liked by 1 person

  13. shipley130 says:

    Denial playbook. It has hints of Spanish Inquisition plays in it.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s