Tucker Carlson Interviews Devin Nunes: “This is a phoney FISA”, “Completely Fraudulent”…

House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) Chairman Devin Nunes appears on Fox News with Tucker Carlson to discuss the redactions within the Carter Page FISA application. About two-thirds of the way through the interview Nunes describes the document as “a phoney FISA“, moments later “a completely fraudulent document“… WATCH:

The Intelligence Laundry

This entry was posted in AG Jeff Sessions, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Decepticons, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, Desperately Seeking Hillary, FBI, IG Report FISA Abuse, media bias, NSA, President Trump, Spygate, Spying, THE BIG UGLY, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

266 Responses to Tucker Carlson Interviews Devin Nunes: “This is a phoney FISA”, “Completely Fraudulent”…

  1. Brainiac says:

    Rep. Nunes is a national treasure. His yeoman’s work has been stunning, and courageous.
    It has been years since I have seen a US Rep. do such vital and important work.
    Where are our Senators?
    My wife and I just sent the max $ donations to Rep. Nunes reelection campaign.
    I just wish we could do more.

    Liked by 11 people

    • Joseph Arbuckle says:

      Nunes has said it’s sad he has to do this, since it’s a waste of his time really – if others didn’t obstruct he could be doing even more!

      Liked by 6 people

      • Good Job! says:

        Consider that Rosenstein stated in committee that the Carter Page Fisa papers he signed were not what he was led to believe he signed. Or something like that. Only thing certain is congress didn’t follow up on that publicly.

        Consider if Rosenstein thought he was signing something about the other warrant for two Russian banks.

        “100% a fraud” is strong wording and may be a lot more than the use of the obviously fake “dossier.”


    • Betty says:

      When are we going to stop praising politicians who go in tv to fund raise? Remember Issa and Gowdy going on Greta, even Greta finally got tired of their posturing and started asking them what they were going to do about it – maybe that is why she’s gone?

      I like Devin Nunes but when I saw that “oh – oh” grin and heard his excuse that we should all imagine what the media would do to him if he dared read the memo or leak it. Something that he sees VERY CLEARLY NEEDS TO BE DONE – but his solution is LET OUR PRESIDENT DO IT.

      And what does Rep Nunes mean by his repeated ‘you understand, you understand this Tucker, you can understand”? Is he really saying “Shut up Tucker, Shut up Tucker, you know everyone is supposed to GO ALONG with this”?

      Compare Issa, Gowdy, and Nunes with Diane Feinstein who read the CIA torture memos into the record of the senate; or got a cold that so clouded her judgement that she released a transcript that tipped off everyone else to be questioned on a matter before her committee.

      She acted, weather you like her or hate her she acted.

      So put you money where you mouth is Mr. Nunes – read the FISA and call for a vote to vacate the Chair and then go on Tucker and fund raise.

      Liked by 4 people

      • Spencer's Mom says:

        What Nunes is saying is that if he reveals what is in the redacted parts of the FISA, then the DEEP STATE OPERATIVES will go after him and his family with a vengeance – and he may already have been threatened – with at minimum endless IRS audits and at maximum with physical harm to himself and his family. THAT is what he means. Do you not get it? Everyone knows about the infamous Arkanacide “lists” – maybe he doesn’t want himself and his loved ones (wife, children) to end up on such a list?

        Is that so hard to understand?

        Liked by 1 person

        • Concerned says:

          Careful, If I step out of line to far someone from the deep state will kill me or my family.

          Then, we are given the opportunity by continuing down this path to change nothing, if we are to accept your analysis. And, that the President of the United States is operating under these same constraints. And, that all of our politicians operate under the same fear or concern for those in their family.

          Anything they can do to you, you can do to them!


  2. Is there no profile in courage in Congress who will either read this on the House floor or leak it to Tucker?

    Liked by 6 people

  3. jmclever says:

    If you think about it, AG Sessions does not have to terminate the Special Counsel. He only has to set a deadline for the report. I’m sure they’ll try, but neither the MSM nor the Congress can use that to impeach anybody.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Mark McQueen says:

    I don’t think it’s fair to suggest the Republicans enter into the realm of possibly illegal actions (releasing classified documents without the legal process) just because Dems do it. Especially with all the attention we’ve drawn to that issue. That’s a battle we don’t have to fight just yet. Hopefully it won’t become necessary. I don’t think it will.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Betty says:

      It is too “fair to suggest Republican” find a way to get the truth out to us. Nunes has said time and time again that the only reason the content of the warrant is being redacted is DOJ/FBI CYA.

      And as for your declaration of “That’s a battle we don’t have to fight …” go jump in a lake. Both you and Nunes think Our President is the only person of Gods green earth that can fight, why is that? Do you believe he doesn’t have other things to do?

      “Nunes can go on the House floor and disclose the contents of the FISA warrants which do not involve sources or methods, but do expose the corruption of the DOJ-FBI-Obama to the public which would be protected under the Speech and Debates clause, based on the Feinstein precedent”. -Wbboei

      You want us all to just roll over and play dead.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Betty says:

        It is all neither here no there now anyway. Just as Tucker electrified all of us Trump supporters, it galvanized the deep state. I wonder how many minutes after that Tucker segment aired it took before deep state operatives started calling Nunes to shut him up. I wonder if his phone has stopped ringing yet?

        Should we count the days till we see Nunes on tv again?

        Liked by 1 person

      • Mark McQueen says:

        You assume the truth will never be told. If you are going to quote me then quote me. You cut off the “just yet” and another qualifier to my thoughts, “Hopefully it won’t become necessary”. So …. incomplete quote. Ignore further content that qualifies the ideas. Finish by drawing your own incorrect conclusion. You should work for the MSM.


  5. brenrod says:

    If the unredacted fisa warrant is so obviously fraudulent plus showing/indicating the complete crimes of the fbi cia fabrications of dossier etc……….perhaps the stall is designed to flood the terrible info just before the election with little time to rebutt. The problem is not the truth but the ability of the deep state, swamp and media alliance which creates fake alternate perspectives on these massive crimes. The crimes are massive but the deep state, swamp and media alliance is able to keep a good portion of the citizenry away from seeing the picture….. so many folks dont actually believe they did this.

    Liked by 3 people

    • DD More says:

      I like what REX @_ImperatorRex_ posted.
      Now it may be that there’s a reason why it can’t be released. Ongoing investigations, etc.
      Fine. In that case, @DevinNunes , TELL US. Explain. Be upfront.
      No more GAMES. We are all sick to death of it. We already have a fair idea of what we are going to find, anyway.
      A rogue ‘off the book’ CIA/FBI stitch up, using foreign (UK) intel, signed off by Brennan and approved by Obama, permitting illegal warrantless surveillance of US citizens.
      Perhaps even WORSE.
      Used in a FISA application with unverified gossip (Steele Dossier), secretly funded by Clinton, to justify existing illegal spying on Team Trump, by obtaining a Title I FISA warrant.
      Am I close, @DevinNunes ?

      Which leads me to ask – Everybody is speculating on what the FISA Judges heard, info given, ruled on and based their approval on. Why don’t they get called before the HPSCI and TELL ALL?

      Liked by 3 people

  6. Beau Geste says:

    A couple of questions.
    1. Rosenstein signed the fraudulent FISA request, then appointed Mueller in an unnecessary, but incredibly short period of time. There MUST have been prior discussion and agreement about a special counsel and appointing Mueller? Any potential pre-planning conspiracy needs to be investigzted with at least the vigor of mueller’s attack on trump.
    2. Judicial Watch got some records that Strzok insisted on keeping “declassification” authority. Was this to protect “leaking” of classified material to the New York Times or other collaborators for political purposes? What, if anything, has Strzok or Mueller, declassified for leaking?

    Liked by 2 people

  7. B. Franklin says:

    Tucker called for anyone in the public sphere that has the unredacted FISA application to send it to him and he will release it to all. america has to know. He seems to go above and beyond where other talking heads are going. It kind of makes sense… Imagine if the whole FISA application did surface, I bet the MSM would still not acknowledge the 5 eyes work around with the UK that Brennan orchestrated to plant informants to frame Trump…what a disgrace. America needs this ASAP.

    Liked by 7 people

    • Robert Smith says:

      It would be nice if a renegade, with some modicum of self-respect, from the NYTimes releases it.


    • Betty says:

      Tempting and daring President Trump to declassify the FISA warrant or any thing else is ALSO AN ATTEMPT TO FRAME TRUMP FOR OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

      So pay attention to who is calling for POTUS to do it.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Robert Smith says:

        Got to be careful not to disrupt ongoing investigations as they say.


        • Betty says:

          Don’t get me wrong I am not saying that the contents of the FUSA warrant should not be revealed to us (not a typo). I am saying President Trump should not have to be the one to do it. If Nunes is too delicate to do it, lets get AG Sessions to do it.

          We are ultimately responsible for what our government does. their top secret, national security, ongoing investigation scam has to be called out for what it is – OBSTRUCTION OF THE PEOPLE’S RIGHT TO MAKE INFORMED DECISIONS ON THE FUTURE OF ALL THOSE AGENCIES, INCLUDING THE FISA COURT. Why are those FISA judges silent, they, if they are not part of the corruption, have been grievously wronged and should come to us for justice.

          And I did not like Nunes repeating over and over again to Tucker – you understand, you can understand, you understand. Reminding Tucker to sing in tune or dance in step.

          How many times have we watched anchors just nod their head and go along with a lie. Just a few minutes ago I heard the 17 intelligence agencies were behind the hacking and saw Dana PerRINO nodding her head. Tucker Carlson and a few others call them on their lies, but way more need to start.


          • Robert Smith says:

            Yeah, I said that half in jest. I feel your frustration and we are getting close to the breaking point. I feel things like Trump’s increasing poll numbers, the Asian NYTs racist, Q, and slow drip of uncovered coup information will force the desperate left to something drastic. Then the information will come out.


      • Beau Geste says:

        On the other hand, the “leaked” Mueller threat to indict Trump for “obstruction by tweet” is likely a threat to cut off Trump’s direct communication with the people, not filtered through the “enemy of the people” press. Trump told Mueller to pound sand by tweeting:
        ..This is a terrible situation and Attorney General Jeff Sessions should stop this Rigged Witch Hunt right now, before it continues to stain our country any further. Bob Mueller is totally conflicted, and his 17 Angry Democrats that are doing his dirty work are a disgrace to USA

        So, Trump is daring Mueller to charge him with “obstruction by tweet”. Trump is defending his first amendment right to free speech, and as President to communicate danger to the public. Trumps popularity went up to 50%.

        Out President warns of Star Chamber danger, while
        Muller fans screech only he has free leak speech.


    • Chewbarkah says:

      Tucker’s best hope on that would be to start dating Ali Watkins.


      • donna kovacevic says:

        Tucker is married, plus he does not want sloppy seconds, thirds etc. I have great respect for Devin Nunes and I am sure he knows what he is doing. God Bless Nunes.


  8. Mercenary says:

    It’s pretty obvious that this is part of a slow drip strategy to start with the origin of the Strzrok/Mueller investigation and slowly work their way up.

    Trump will clearly declassify it at some point; the only question is when.

    First they worked on raising awareness of the dossier – now they’re moving to the next step and raising awareness on the FISA warrant.

    As they expose the origins of the Strzok/Mueller investigation, the public will slowly turn against them.

    I think Trump declassifies the warrant before November.

    Liked by 3 people

  9. Concerned says:

    TUCKER CARLSON Calls On GOP Lawmakers to Read Entire Unredacted FISA Memo on House Floor (VIDEO)
    Tucker called on the lawmakers to do what Dianne Feinstein did and read the entire memo on the House floor.

    In December 2014 Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) unilaterally released the CIA Torture Report on terrorist detainees on the Senate floor.

    Tucker Carlson: I just wanted to say this. We spoke to the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee a minute ago. Devin Nunes of California is an honorable person… He has read the whole text of the application for the FISA warrant by the government, the Obama administration to spy on Carter Page and the Trump Campaign. He says the parts that have been redacted do not in any way threaten American national security. It is merely butt-covering on the part of the bureaucracy. We ask the obvious question which is why don’t you just tell us what’s in it and let the public decide, let the public judge. In the commercial break I got an interesting text, I’m going to read it on the air from a very informed person in Washington. And I’m quoting, “Dianne Feinstein entered the CIA torture memos into the record of the senate and was protected by the speech and debate clause. Any Republican with access to the FISA warrant could do the same. Complete immunity awaits them. I believe that to be true… I will say one more time, if you know what’s in the redacted portions of that application please send it to us. The public has a right to know.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s