Secretary Pompeo, Foreign Minister Taro Kono and Foreign Minister Kang Kyung-wha Hold Joint Press Conference…

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Japanese Foreign Minister Taro Kono, and South Korean Foreign Minister Kang Kyung-wha hold a joint press conference following a trilateral debriefing of ongoing negotiations with the U.S. and North Korea.

[Transcript] FOREIGN MINISTER KONO: Thank you. It is my glad pleasure to welcome Secretary Mike Pompeo and Minister Kang Kyung-wha to Tokyo for this trilateral foreign ministers’ meeting. The last time we gathered in Seoul was less than a month ago, immediately after U.S.-North Korea summit in Singapore. The timing and the frequency of the meeting have enabled smooth and effective trilateral coordination; its outcome could then be fed into the process between the U.S. and North Korea.

The responsibility Secretary Pompeo assumed after the summit in Singapore is very significant, and Minister Kang and I stand hand-in-hand with Secretary Pompeo to support him all the way till the end.

I would also like to pay tribute to the earnest effort by Minister Kang to serve as a bridge between U.S. and North Korea. Her effort has paved the way for the subsequent summit in Singapore.

Today, we were able to reaffirm our unwavering commitment to continue strengthening of our trilateral cooperation towards the common goal of North Korea’s complete, verifiable, and irreversible dismantlement of all weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles of all ranges.

We have also had in-depth discussion on how we can cooperate to urge North Korea to take concrete actions towards the full implementation of relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions, and we confirmed that security assurance will be provided to North Korea, as agreed in the summit in Singapore.

At the same time, we have reaffirmed that international community will continue to fully implement relevant UN Security Council resolutions in order to materialize CVID. Japan continues to seek normalize its relations with North Korea in accordance with Pyongyang Declaration through comprehensively resolving outstanding issues of concern such as nuclear missile and abductions issue, as well as through the settlement of the unfortunate past.

We wish to initiate a new start for our relations with North Korea. Japan is determined to continue playing a major role in realizing peace and stability in Northeast Asia in close coordination with United States and ROK. In this regard, I am very much looking forward to continue working closely with both Secretary Pompeo and Minister Kang in coming month.

Thank you very much.

MODERATOR: Thank you very much. Now let us invite Secretary Mike Pompeo. Secretary, please.

SECRETARY POMPEO: Thank you. It’s an honor to be here on my first trip to Tokyo as the Secretary of State for the United States of America, and I am thrilled to be here. Thank you, Foreign Minister Kono, for hosting me. Foreign Minister Kang, thank you so much for all the help you have provided me in the days since the Singapore summit.

Before I talk about North Korea, I want to say that we are closely following the news of the flooding and landslides that are hitting western Japan. The United States expresses its deep condolences to the families of those who died, and we send our thoughts and prayers to the families who are injured or missing. To our Japanese friends, the American people stand with you as you recover from this tragedy.

As we build on the momentum of President Trump and Chairman Kim Jong-un’s historic summit, the United States, the Republic of Korea, and Japan continue to strengthen our trilateral cooperation to achieve the goals set out in Singapore. To that very end, today’s meeting was a top priority after my talks in North Korea these past days.

Over two days, my team and I met with Vice Minister Chairman Kim Jong-ul – chul – Kim Yong-chul and his colleagues. We had good-faith, productive conversations which will continue in the days and weeks ahead. In the meantime, sanctions remain in place, and we will continue to enforce them with great vigor.

During the visit, we intended to build upon the agreements made by President Trump and Chairman Kim, and we made progress. But first let me make clear North Korea reaffirmed its commitment to complete denuclearization. We had detailed and substantive discussions about the next steps towards a fully verified and complete denuclearization.

In addition, North Korea agreed to meet in mid-July in Panmunjom to discuss the repatriation of remains of our American service members. North Korea also reaffirmed its earlier commitment to destroy its missile engine test site, which will make the region and the world safer. We also established a working-level team that will carry out the day-to-day work of our two sides.

Yep, the road ahead will be difficult and challenging, and we know critics will try to minimize the work that we’ve achieved. But our allies, like the Republic of Korea and Japan, President Trump and I believe that peace is worth the effort. And that’s something that we all want. As allies we share and are committed to the same goal – the fully verified, final denuclearization of North Korea, as agreed to by Chairman Kim Jong-un.

As President Trump has said, there is no limit to what North Korea can achieve if it gives up its nuclear weapons. Should the DPRK follow through on its commitments, we look forward to eventually helping North Korea obtain prosperity and earn the respect of the world; however, North Korea will first have to fulfill its commitments to denuclearize. Sanctions will remain in place until final, fully verified denuclearization, as agreed to by Chairman Kim, occurs. Multiple UN Security Council resolutions unanimously passed require all nations to fully enforce those sanctions. Our three countries will continue to be vocal in reminding each country of its obligations to do so.

And so while we are encouraged by the progress of these talks, progress alone does not justify the relaxation of the existing sanctions regime. There is also no change to our ironclad commitment to the defense of our allies, the Republic of Korea and Japan. The security of our allies is integral to our American security. The United States looks forward to continuing our close coordination with Japan and South Korea as we achieve the successful implementation of the agreement that was achieved at the Singapore summit.

Thank you.

MODERATOR: Thank you very much. Lastly, let us invite Minister Kang Kyung-wha. Minister, please.

FOREIGN MINISTER KANG: Thank you very much. Welcome, ladies and gentlemen of the press. It is indeed a distinct honor for me to be here with Secretary of State Mr. Mike Pompeo and my Japanese counterpart, Foreign Minister Taro Kono, here in Tokyo so soon after Secretary Pompeo’s third visit to Pyongyang.

But first of all, let me also reiterate the sentiment expressed by Secretary Pompeo about the terrible losses caused by the torrential rain and flooding in western Japan. Our thoughts are very much with the families and communities affected by this climactic event, and we wish them, the government, swift recovery and our greatest sympathies to the families affected.

Secretary Pompeo’s visit to Pyongyang, his third one, this visit having taken place in follow-up to the historic U.S.-North Korea summit, has been a productive starting point for implementing the agreements reached between President Trump and Chairman Kim in Singapore. Today’s meeting among the three of us underscores the unwavering commitment on the part of our three countries to achieve the shared goal of complete denuclearization and the establishment of lasting peace and – on the Korean Peninsula.

First and foremost, I would like to express my deepest gratitude and admiration to Secretary Pompeo for his tireless efforts to advance the dialogue with North Korea with a great deal of patient and deep commitment to turning this historic opportunity into reality of a nuclear-free, peaceful Korean Peninsula.

At today’s meeting, Secretary Pompeo explained to us in detail the results of his visit to North Korea and gave us a good sense of the work going forward, including the meeting scheduled at Panmunjom on July 12th regarding the return of the POW/MIA remains, but for further consultations to be had with North Korea going forward.

In the two rounds of the inter-Korean summits and last month’s U.S.-North Korea summit, the three leaders clearly set the direction towards our shared goal, and Secretary Pompeo’s visit to Pyongyang this time has taken the first steps in that direction. And we expect there to be – these to be followed up by further constructive and productive negotiations between the U.S. and North Korea, and the Republic of Korea stands ready to provide whatever assistance is needed to move the dialogue along.

The Security Council sanctions, as we have agreed in our trilateral meeting, will remain in place and faithfully implemented until we are assured of complete denuclearization by North Korea. North Korea’s denuclearization and provision of security guarantees and economic development that it desires must move together in our joint efforts to chart a brighter future towards lasting peace and prosperity on the Korean Peninsula and indeed beyond in this region.

This was the blueprint set forth in President Moon’s speech in Berlin a year ago, as well as the vision that President Trump and Chairman Kim agreed to in Singapore. And therefore, it is thus in the interest of all that we move forward expeditiously in this endeavor.

We have also confirmed once again that the ROK-U.S. alliance is firm and strong and will remain so during this process of North Korea’s denuclearization. We have made it clear that decisions to suspend certain parts of the ROK-U.S. joint military exercises, including the UFG, has been taken jointly with the aim of encouraging North Korea to actively and expeditiously engage in the denuclearization process, and that our combined defense posture will remain ironclad. Our two countries will continue to maintain watertight coordination in any and all issues related to the ROK-U.S. alliance.

In closing, may I once thank again my counterparts, Minister Kono and Secretary Pompeo, for the show of solidarity that our three countries have maintained as we have and will continue to engage on the issue of North Korea’s complete denuclearization and lasting peace on the Korean Peninsula.

Thank you very much.

MODERATOR: Thank you very much. Now we would like to move on to the Q&A session. Those who wish to make – ask a question, please raise your hand. Upon my appointing, please move to the nearest microphone and identify yourself with your name and media outlet.

Please kindly be advised to make your questions succinct. Now the floor is open. The lady in the front seat.

QUESTION: Thank you. This is Ryo Kiyomiya from Asahi Shimbun, Japanese newspaper company. I have two questions. First, I would like to ask each of you, recently the U.S. defines its goal as final, fully verified denuclearization of North Korea instead of CVID – complete, verifiable, and irreversible denuclearization. It seems softer than CVID. My question is: Will the U.S., Japan, and South Korea continue to work towards CVID of North Korea? And what do you think is the difference between CVID and final, fully verified denuclearization?

And my second question is about the abduction issue of the Japanese. Secretary Pompeo, you said you raised the abduction issue of the Japanese during your visit to North Korea. We would like to know the detail and response from North Korea. Secretary and Minister Kang, how will the U.S. and South Korea work with Japan on this abduction issue?

(Via interpreter) And my question is to Minister Kono regarding the Japanese policy on countering or reacting to these issues. Thank you.

FOREIGN MINISTER KONO: (Via interpreter) First, I would like to respond to your question. With respect to related resolutions of the Security Council, it clearly stipulates that North Korea must dismantle in a method – complete and verifiable, irreversible method dismantle the WMD as well as the ballistic missiles. So it is clearly stipulated that CVID is demanded in the resolutions.

As far as we are concerned, we would like to continue to work toward North Korea so that North Korea would completely implement the Security Council’s resolution. We are completely in agreement on that.

In terms of the international community, we are in agreement. For me, see, instead of CVID denuclearization of Korean Peninsula, sometimes I refer to this phrase. But even in doing so, what I mean is to look toward the dismantlement of all weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles of all ranges, at least as Security Council stipulates certain goals. And that should be solidly implemented by North Korea, and we have to demand North Korea to do that. We have – we are unchanged in that goal. So the words may be different and there is no much – not much significance in the different phrases and words that we may use.

Now on the question of abduction, from Secretary Pompeo this time around the issue was raised, and I’d like to thank him for raising the issue at the meeting. Regarding the reaction from North Korea, I will refrain from making any comment.

As far as Japan is concerned, the U.S. and North Korean negotiations should advance furthermore, and we’d like to work in tandem with the international community so that Security Council resolution-based sanction can be solidly implemented regarding North Korea.

Thank you.


SECRETARY POMPEO: Yes, sure. Go ahead.

FOREIGN MINISTER KANG: Well, I think our goal remains complete denuclearization, and I think the FFVD, as used by Secretary Pompeo, isn’t any softer in stating our shared goal of complete denuclearization. Obviously, terms have historical context, and this has been somewhat difficult for North Korea to signed onto in written form, but we are assured that Mr. Pompeo’s engagement with the North Koreans have been very, very clear on what complete denuclearization means and how to get from here to complete denuclearization, which means the complete dismantlement of the weapons, the materials, the facilities, the plans. This is a very clearly-set goal for North Korea, and we expect them to deliver on this commitment to complete denuclearization.

On the abduction issue, yes, my president has also raised this in two rounds of discussions with Chairman Kim, and we urge them to engage in bilateral discussions with Japan on this issue. After all, it’s a bilateral issue. We also have a couple of our nationals detained in North Korea, so it’s an issue that concerns us as well.

Thank you.

SECRETARY POMPEO: I think my two colleagues answered your first question very clearly. There is no difference. But most importantly is what the North Koreans understand. We had lengthy discussions about the scope of what complete denuclearization means over the past two days. They acknowledge that this is broad; this is, as my two colleagues have said, from weapons systems to fissile material to the production facilities, enrichment facilities, across the range of weapons and missiles. It’s a broad definition of denuclearization. The North Koreans understand that and have not challenged that.

Second, they also understand that denuclearization makes no sense absent verification, and they acknowledge that as well. There will be a verification connected to the complete denuclearization. It’s what President Trump and Chairman Kim both agreed to. And so folks can try and parse words should they choose to do so. What’s most important is what the North Koreans understand and the demands that the world is making of North Korea, and there can be – it’s unmistakable, the scope of what denuclearization means to the North Koreans. I’ve been very clear with them.

Second, I did raise the issue of the abduction of Japanese. I’ve done it at each conversation I’ve had with my North Korean counterparts, whether it was on my first two trips with Chairman Kim or on this trip with Kim Yong-chul. I’ve raised it repeatedly. I won’t go into any of the details about particular parts of that element of our discussion. Know that it is important to the United States; it’s part of our discussions each and every time we interact with our North Korean counterparts.

MODERATOR: Second question. Gentleman in front of the microphone, please.

QUESTION: Hi, Mr. Secretary. Thank you very much for hosting this. I’m David Clark from Agence France-Presse, AFP. Following your talks yesterday, Mr. Secretary, the North Koreans issued a statement in which they described your demands as gangster-like and insisted that there be a series of political and economic concessions hand-in-hand with the progress towards denuclearization. You have said that maximum pressure will continue until this denuclearization, as you define it, is complete.

Is there any scope for concessions en route, or will they simply have to accept denuclearization before you can move towards sanctions relief and political settlement of the Korean War and so forth, the other demands that they have? Thank you.


QUESTION: Oh, and given what they’ve said, how can you continue to say that you believe they are negotiating in good faith?

SECRETARY POMPEO: Because they were. And they did. It’s pretty simple. So look, people are going to make certain comments after meetings. If I paid attention to what the press said, I’d go nuts, and I refuse to do that. I am determined to achieve the commitment that President Trump made, and I am counting on Chairman Kim to be determined to follow through on the commitment that he made. And so if those requests were gangster-like, they are – the world is a gangster, because there was a unanimous decision at the UN Security Council about what needs to be achieved.

The second point, as we move forward, we have been very clear there were three parts of the agreement in the Singapore summit. There were the establishment of peaceful relations between the countries, increased security assurances to North Korea and its people, and finally, denuclearization. Each of those needs to be conducted in parallel. We need to work on those efforts simultaneously. And so it is absolutely the case that there are places where there will be things that take place along the way that help achieve the security assurances that the North Koreans need and improvement in the peaceful relations between our two countries during the time that denuclearization is taking place.

But the economic sanctions are a different kettle of fish altogether. The economic sanctions and the continued enforcement – so the world will see continued enforcement actions by the United States in the days and weeks ahead, and I’m counting on those other countries that are with me here today and others around the world to continue to enforce these sanctions as well. The enforcement of those sanctions will continue until denuclearization is complete.

MODERATOR: Due to the time constraint, I would like to make the next question the last one. Madam, please.

QUESTION: (Via interpreter) Hello, I am Yoon Seol-Young from JoongAng Daily, JTBC. Secretary Pompeo, you mentioned how you saw many progress in almost all central issues, however North Korea stated that the United States had unilateral position and it expressed regrets for that. Secretary Pompeo, you highlighted FFVD, so I would like to know what reaction North Korea showed to this.

And we believe that there were also other discussions. So regarding declaration of North Korea’s nuclear missile facilities and stockpiles and also timeline to denuclearization, how much achievement have you achieved?

And finally, you did not meet Chairman Kim Jong-un this time around. Is there any particular reason for that?

SECRETARY POMPEO: With respect to progress, you again referred to the statements after the event. I was there for the event. I know actually what precisely took place. When we spoke to them about the scope of denuclearization, they did not push back. It wasn’t my language; it was the language of Chairman Kim. He committed to complete denuclearization.

The commitment that Chairman Kim made is important and powerful, and I am convinced that he understands the commitment he made, and I am hopeful that we will find a path forward to achieve that commitment that Chairman Kim himself made personally to President Trump and then to world in the signed agreement between our two leaders.

With respect to timeline, we talked about timeline a great deal during our conversations. There’s still much work to do to establish what the precise timeline for the various events will be, and we talked about it in the context of the continued commitment of North Korea to destroy their missile engine test site, a commitment that they reaffirmed yesterday and told us that it would happen at a time that was important. And we told them important would be soon, and I am hopeful that that will take place soon. It will be an important event along the step towards denuclearization. It will be a good step towards fulfilling their goal.

And then your final question was about the fact that I did not meet with Chairman Kim Jong-un on this trip. It was never anticipated that I would meet with him. We went there to work with Kim Yong-chul and our two teams to work together over the course of two days. We did just that.

MODERATOR: This concludes the joint press conference. Thank you very much.

(Transcript Link)

This entry was posted in China, Donald Trump, Japan, media bias, N Korea, President Trump, Uncategorized, USA. Bookmark the permalink.

50 Responses to Secretary Pompeo, Foreign Minister Taro Kono and Foreign Minister Kang Kyung-wha Hold Joint Press Conference…

  1. cowpokesblog says:

    Not sure why the Trump admin is making this so complexed. The MAD concept solved the problem decades ago.
    Just go silent for 6 months and then have South Korea and Japan explode their own nuclear test devices weeks apart and claim they can no longer count on Trump, America or Anyone else to defend them. BOOM Now who want’s to negotiate.

    Liked by 3 people

    • annieoakley says:

      Like, a lot.

      Liked by 2 people

    • WRB says:

      To my mind, non-proliferation of nuclear weapons is a better long-term strategy.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

        Of course China controls North Korea.
        China IS the problem and it always has been in the Korean peninsula. North Korean communists invaded the south with a sneak attack in June of 1950 pushing free forces down into a tiny corner at the bottom of the country. In September the American regional commander located in Japan, Douglas Macarthur, lead a bold counter attack at Inchon and retook the southern capital of Seoul. He chased the North Koreans back up over the 38th parallel toward the Yalu River border with China, Manchuria.
        The great General Macarthur issued an ultimatum to Mao in Peking to stay out of it or risk tactical atomic retaliation against Chinese Red Army locations along the border in Manchuria. The US president at the time, Harry Truman, was furious and like all democrats was only interested in appeasing communists around the world. He released a statement saying that the general did not have the authority to make that ultimatum. A month later, In November, 100s of 1,000s of Chinese troops stormed across the border southward into Korea in yet another communist sneak attack.
        Outnumbered, unprepared, and surprised the UN forces helping the South Koreans went into retreat. Over the following months many, many American and international troops died at the hands of the Red Chinese. General Macarthur still wanted to hit the communist supply hubs along the Yalu River with tactical nukes and kept making public statements about politicians not allowing him to win the war there in Korea.
        For that he was unceremoniously fired by the president on April 11, 1951. Just 10 months into a war where fighting lasted over 3 years the famed American general in charge was taken off the chess board by his own commander in chief. So, a war that could have been won in 6 months turned into the mess we face today because democrat politicians refused to let the warriors control the battlefield.

        Liked by 3 people

        • G. Combs says:

          “…So, a war that could have been won in 6 months turned into the mess we face today because democrat politicians refused to let the warriors control the battlefield.”

          Yes, BUT just THINK of ALL the money the Banksters and War Industies have made!

          Congressional Record, February 9, 1917

          “[…]Mr. CALLAWAY:
          Mr. Chairman, under unanimous consent, I insert into the Record at this point a statement showing the newspaper combination, which explains their activity in the war matter, just discussed by the gentleman from Pennsylvania [Mr. MOORE]:

          “In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, ship building and powder interests and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press in the United States.

          “These 12 men worked the problems out by selecting 179 newspapers, and then began, by an elimination process, to retain only those necessary for the purpose of controlling the general policy of the daily press throughout the country. They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. The 25 papers were agreed upon; emissaries were sent to purchase the policy, national and international, of these papers; an agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers.

          “This contract is in existence at the present time, and it accounts for the news columns of the daily press of the country being filled with all sorts of preparedness arguments and misrepresentations as to the present condition of the United States Army and Navy, and the possibility and probability of the United States being attacked by foreign foes.[…]”

          Liked by 2 people

        • Cuppa Covfefe says:

          Amen. And that was the first of many intentionally unwinnable (or half-fought) wars the elites have pushed us into; to pad their accounts while killing our youth and our future.

          Time to aim the weapons at them; the Devil’s “Illumined” tools, and the root of evil on this planet (for the love of money is the root of all evil)…

          Liked by 2 people

  2. thedoc00 says:

    Kim is the Bride of Chuckie with President Xi being Chuckie. An interesting that Kim fears for his life, but not from US hit teams but from the Chinese or one of their North Korean Operatives. The power behind the Chinese Government has allot of experience eliminating and replacing cult figures among their own, so one can assume they have a clone of Kim waiting in the wings. So, this is going to be a very complex two headed problem to solve, if a solution truly is allowed by the Chinese.
    The Russians equipped the North Korean Army and goaded them into action in 1950, but it was the Chinese who spent 100,000’s of casualties and allot of equipment to preserve them. After that point the Chinese essentially owned North Korea.
    Expect more good meetings with ugly press releases afterwards, until a solution is reached either way.

    Liked by 4 people

    • cowpokesblog says:

      The Clown Show could be over VERY SOON, IF Japan and South Korea simply put out a joint statement that they are forming a JOINT NUCLEAR task force with the AID of THE UNITED STATES to develop their OWN DEFENSE using NUKES.
      4D CHESS CHECKMATE!!!!!!!!!!
      Why is this so Hard to understand?

      Liked by 1 person

      • rf121 says:

        Japan using nukes? Guess you need to read up on their post war history.

        Liked by 5 people

      • thedoc00 says:

        Never happen, the Japanese Constitution and people for one will not allow it. Plus, that opens the door for everybody in the Pacific to have a Nuclear Weapon and MAD only works if both sides acknowledge it matter. China could care less if North Korea became an uninhabitable waste land while Japan, North Korea and US territory also suffered. What part of that do you not under stand??

        Liked by 5 people

      • Karmaisabitch says:

        What is so hard to understand about a halt to nuclear armament, nuclear disarmament is why we are there. Why do you think there’s a embargo against Iran and they’re not allowed to get a nuclear weapon? I think your insistence about arming S. K and Japan, and your yelling, out of tune.

        Liked by 3 people

      • daughnworks247 says:

        Everyone having a nuke is what we are trying to avoid.

        Liked by 3 people

  3. fleporeblog says:

    Is there anyone other than Secretary Pompeo that you would want leading this effort on behalf of our President, our country and the entire world. In my book there is no one that would be considered a close second. He is the PERFECT man for the job. He is loyal to our President and abuses the WHORES with such ease.

    These POS want to see us fail. I actually think it motivates Secretary Pompeo even more to make sure we succeed. Gangsta is a term used before by the North Korean spokespersons. I think they are shocked that our President and his Secretary won’t give an inch in terms of sanction relief until that last missile is removed and our inspectors give the green light. Even the WHORES in the press are baffled by that. In their world, we give in as we move along. We will guarantee protection to North Korea 🇰🇵 but we won’t lift a single monetary sanction.

    It kills their narrative that our President is getting played. There is no playing our President if the only way you get relief is to fulfill the entire agreement. If China 🇨🇳 plays games and decides to lift sanctions, our President will destroy their economy by shutting down their banking system to the world with sanctions. The Chinese realize they can only push so much before they are punched in the mouth.

    This is Peace through STRENGTH! We have the right men to lead us forward and achieve the unthinkable. That is exactly what is going to happen no matter how much the WHORES, Left, Democrats etc. wish and pray otherwise!

    Liked by 21 people

    • cowpokesblog says:

      Well, John Bolton is sitting in the wings AFTER this fiasco. So ask yourself, is John Smirking, Scowling, OR Worrying????
      Remember, Bolton IS Americas Knight on the worlds 4D Chess board

      Liked by 1 person

    • fleporeblog says:

      Iran 🇮🇷 understands damn well what PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH means:

      Liked by 18 people

    • Dutchman says:

      Pompeo really IS a ‘chip off the old block’ (DJT);

      He has ALREADY done more, in the short time since confirmed, than his last 2 predecessors (not talking about rex) put together, in their full terms as SoS.

      And, started to work, even before sworn in.
      Sound like anyone we know?

      DJT must be so proud!

      Liked by 9 people

    • bkrg2 says:

      Great assessment flep!
      I’m really liking Pompeo. I was a huge Rex fan, so not taking anything away from Rex.
      I feel Popeo’s “swagger” is what we need stateside. And his ‘no BS’ stance is what we need globally.
      This is where is see the right man and the right time. I feel Rex would try to be too diplomatic in these NK discussion. We have moved on to the need for the peach through strength being shown by team Trump.
      Believe me, I sleep much better now. We leave for Seoul on July 25 to visit my son and thing are much safer now.

      Liked by 2 people

  4. bessie2003 says:

    Thank you for finding and posting this. Yesterday there was only a 4 minute spot of this on the Fox channel and so tried to find it on the other news channels, the C-Spans, and was hoping this would be put up.

    Liked by 5 people

  5. Lumina says:

    Secretary Pompeo always has the most pleasant, calm expression on his face. He seems to be a sincere man…

    Liked by 9 people

    • jahealy says:

      I love him and we need him. Which is why I want him to get control of the weight gain before it becomes a health concern. He looks bigger in each successive picture.

      Liked by 5 people

      • jmclever says:

        Bullet proof vests tend to add bulk to the wearer’s appearance

        Liked by 4 people

        • jahealy says:

          Yes, I know. Unless he’s wearing a thicker vest in each successive picture, however, he’s gaining a dangerous amount of weight fairly quickly. Not surprising, given the stress of the job, but dangerous nonetheless.

          Liked by 1 person

      • dayallaxeded says:

        Noticed that lately, too, not from his body, which could be clothing/ballistic gear, but from his face. His open collar at the joint press conference is another tell–believe me, been there, done that. In his position, he should be able to dictate healthy diet and work conditions, though it sometimes takes a “wake-up call” of some kind to make a busy guy doing important things pay attention to himself for a minute. May God guard and guide Scty. Pompeo, give him health and strength to continue MAGA around the world! Same for PDJT, all his family, and all who support him, too, of course! Can I get an AMEN!!

        Liked by 2 people

    • CountryclassVulgarian says:

      He knows the cards he is holding. No need to let everyone else know. Totally Trumpian.

      Liked by 9 people

    • cowpokesblog says:

      Sincere Yes, Realist NO. He needs to GET REAL Announce, President Trump can no longer guarantee JAPAN and SOUTH KOREA’s safety With CHINA AND NORTH KOREA threatening them with NUKES.
      SO as President Of These United States, I hereby acknowledge that JAPAN and SOUTH KOREa Have the legal responsibility to DEFEND THEMSELVES AGAINST TYRANNY!!

      Liked by 1 person

      • trialbytruth says:

        Most here have left Neo-con theory behind. It is not new and has always been a con.

        Liked by 3 people

      • dayallaxeded says:

        CowPoke, you can stop repeating yourself–most folks here have pretty good reading comprehension.

        Here’s the deal with MAD–Destruction’s got to be Mutually Assured as to the controlling parties on both sides. NoKo is not a controlling party–China is. Japan and SoKo are not controlling parties–the US is. We (USA) actually care about our own long-term/range health and safety as well as the lives of other people. China, officially, does not give a fig for anyone outside the immediate ruling class–if they did, they couldn’t be communists in the first place (seeing people as soulless, fungible commodities is an absolutely essential underlying tenet of communism). China cares little if NoKo’s destruction is assured; or SoKo’s; or Japan’s and would probably smile, if USA took a hit from radiation (prevailing winds and currents would probably bring more radiation from nukes in the northern Pac to the USA than to China, e.g., Fukushima In this context, the strategy you propose isn’t MAD, it’s just AD–and with China being able to say it’s taking the “high ground” to stop proliferation, when it takes out SoKo’s and Japan’s
        nuclear/defense capabilities.

        Fortunately, VSGPDJT has decades more experience and historical perspective than any other POTUS since Ike and VSGPDJT is probably much smarter than Ike was. VSGPDJT has more and sharper arrows in his strategy quiver than brute-force MAD. CowPoke, your opinion is on record. Now watch and learn.

        Liked by 1 person

      • jello333 says:

        I’m only just now reading this post (4 days later), so people are unlikely to see my comment. But I just had to say something, if for no other reason than to go on the record. But I can’t believe you’re comments — your REPEATED comments — are really serious. Rather than peace with NKorea, including massively improving the lives of the people in that country, YOU want to keep up the warmongering, huh? Not only that, but spread the threat of nukes even further. You sound very much like the Trump-Haters who are praying for him to FAIL in his efforts in Korea.


    • GB Bari says:

      Secy Pompeo is *very* sincere.
      Deadly seriously sincere.
      Make no mistake about this.

      Liked by 2 people

  6. Cheri Lawrence says:

    Really love Mike Pompeo’s smile! Awesome team with trust that things are in very good hands. So great to be involved in the process. Thank you Sundance on the excellent reporting and no doubt much lack of sleep!!

    Liked by 8 people

  7. Jan says:

    A lot of face saving going on, but nevertheless they are talking. All Anti-American literature/ posters has been taken down in NoKo. China wants to use NoKo to negotiate more favorable economic terms with the US. The US is saying no NoKo nukes and better make trade terms more fair to the US, China. Our President gets it; the MSM & unAmericans don’t. China is bewildered. NoKo wants out from under Pres. Xi’s thumb. US keeps its position in the Pacific theater. China is uneasy. China thought it could easily shut the US out of the Pacific. It didn’t. Peace through strength!! And the wisdom to know which is which.

    Liked by 12 people

  8. Popoy says:

    Sec Pompeo is waaaaaaay better at this kind of stuff than former Sec Tillerson.

    Liked by 9 people

    • Dutchman says:

      Tillerson was a good placeholder, did no lasting harm.

      But compare Pompeo to shudder Hillary, or ‘reporting for duty’ numbnuts who still thought he could preserve the stupid Iran deal.

      Sooo much better! Compare and contrast.

      Liked by 3 people

  9. jjs says:

    I don’t trust South Korea. I think they will knife us in the back when things get tough. They have a leftist government now.


  10. Dutchman says:

    jjs; I don’t trust S.korea, eithrr, but most importantly, DJT doesnt trust them, and can see 20 moves ahead of them.

    Hes a Buford Pusser, walking tall, cardying a BIG F’ING CLUB, striding across the world stage, busting chops right and left, taking on EU, CHINA, GLOBALISTS, etc.

    Do you honestly think there is ANY move they could pull, that DJT hasnt already gamed?
    S. Korea is like,…Canada in G7. Childlike, small, insignificant.

    DJT has SO got this.

    Liked by 8 people

    • WSB says:

      PT always uses the analagy of buying TV sets from SK!

      What a hoot…just cement that for a moment. And then think about globalism, tariffs, and realignment.

      This will be delicious.

      Liked by 2 people

  11. MAJA says:

    The press is unable to deal with complexity, due to their intellect dishonesty but also due to the format they require for controlling the narrative. Twenty-four hours max, then on to the next drama and lie. They do not want, in fact avoid, in-depth analysis of anything and fewer and fewer people believe it as time passes. Of course, the msm is pushing for this to fail and they know we know but cannot change their paradigm (Was that buzzword from the 80s or 90’s?) Which requires that PDJT be an incompent, corrupt puppet, thus all the suggestions that would immediately sabotage any goodwill and guaratee failure are made by those committed to failure, IMHO.

    I don’t understand why anyone would choose to light a fuse under ROK and Japan, or complain about this side of the table buttering the NKs side up, and especially questioning the strategy of standing in solidarity with ROK and Japan. This is great stuff, but maybe I’m missing something. I see it as such a positive. This is bridge building, international cooperation for the betterment of the world. The strategy of injecting one-upsmanship, pitting others at the table against each other, renegotiating conditions after the fact, creating friction and dissension are all laweryly methods. No thanks.

    I sit back and watch things unfold daily that blow me away. I trust PDJT’s plan.

    Liked by 7 people

    • John Denney says:

      “The press is unable to deal with complexity, due to their intellect dishonesty…”

      Well said. The left cannot deal with complexity in general because they make up myriads of ad hoc rules/regulations/laws to address specific unique situation, weaving an unworkable, complex maze.

      A friend stated on Facebook that no one can solve the Middle East because of the complexity. I responded that L.A. traffic is extremely complex, yet a few simple rules makes it all work.

      She queried incredulously if I was comparing L.A. traffic to Palestinians being murdered by Israelis, to which I responded, “It’s complicated.”

      She completely missed the point, and instead was appalled that I could be so flip with people’s lives.

      Liked by 1 person

      • clive hoskin says:

        Obviously,she believes the MSM”s lies about the”So Called”Palestinians?If they were sent back to wherever they came from or driven into the sea,there wouldn’t be any conflict any more.


  12. Vincent Piotet says:

    Deliverable items in the World peace effort – what a concept !
    Meanwhile, the swamp simply exposes itself indecently,
    “justifying” its corrupt and unbelievable behavior.
    We “deplorables” are watching the pile-up
    develop gradually like in a slow-motion
    chronicle of our corruption.

    Bravo, President DJT.
    We love and support
    your courageous
    and intelligent

    Liked by 2 people

  13. Larry says:

    I see the nuclear talks as a side deal. The real “Carrot” is trade.

    I suspect North Korea will become the entry point for the US-South Korea-Japan business interests to trade within China using Western investment rules/practices.

    Think of North Korea as the NAFTA-Mexican version of a bilateral China-North Korea trade agreement.

    Think of the possibilities.

    How does China beat back such a concept within the context of One Belt-One Road?

    We are living in interesting times.

    Liked by 5 people

    • daughnworks247 says:

      Ding, ding, ding, we have a winner and it’s Mr. Larry.
      While Europe is concerned with migrants and climate change, President Trump has aligned the US economy with South Korea, Japan, and Vietnam, to take on China.
      The big one lurking in the background in India.

      Liked by 4 people

      • Larry says:

        As an aside, I suspect Barrett will be named as the next Supreme Court Justice.

        Think about it… How would the Democrats attack her within the context of mid-term elections? All the Democrats would be able to do is pick the hill they plan to die on…

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s