Trail of James Comey’s Dirt on Loretta Lynch Discovered Within IG Report on Andrew McCabe…

A very interesting development is unfolding as a result of internet researcher TracyBeanz [Twitter HERE – YouTube HERE] and some insightful dot connecting by those following.

The outline begins via a relatively under-reported accusation about former Attorney General Loretta Lynch by former FBI Director James Comey in his upcoming book.

According to ABC News Comey writes in “A Higher Loyalty: Truth, Lies and Leadership,” that he became the public face of the investigation partly because of a mysterious development which he felt could cast “serious doubt” on Lynch’s independence.

“Had it become public, the unverified material would undoubtedly have been used by political opponents to cast serious doubt on the attorney general’s independence in connection with the Clinton investigation,” Comey writes, according to ABC. He calls the material a “development still unknown to the American public to this day.” (ABC Link)

It seems rather odd for James Comey to be making such an accusation against Loretta Lynch in the book.  Why add that aspect? ..and why do so without expanding the details?

Well, keep in mind, that at the time the book was written, Mr. Comey had no idea exactly where the ongoing Inspector General investigation might lead; nor did he know the timing of release. Hence, the notation without expanded citation is likely explained.

However, with part of the OIG report released, within the Andrew McCabe background there’s a trail of evidence to the AG involvement James Comey was alluding toward.

On page six of the IG report (point number 4) we find a conference call between Loretta Lynch, Andrew McCabe and the FBI field office in New York where the subject of the Weiner/Abedin/Clinton laptop findings overlap with: the Clinton Foundation (CF) investigation; the Clinton Email investigation; pressure for Asst. Director McCabe to recuse himself, and Washington DC via Loretta Lynch using DOJ Main Justice leverage from the Eric Garner case against the NY FBI office and New York Police Department.

From the OIG report:

4. The Attorney General Expresses Strong Concerns to McCabe and other FBI Officials about Leaks, and McCabe Discusses Recusing Himself from CF Investigation (October 26)

McCabe told the OIG that during the October 2016 time frame, it was his “perception that there was a lot of information coming out of likely the [FBI’s] New York Field Office” that was ending up in the news. McCabe told the OIG that he “had some heated back-and-forths” with the New York Assistant Director in Charge (“NY-ADIC”) over the issue of media leaks.

On October 26, 2016, McCabe and NY-ADIC participated in what McCabe described as “a hastily convened conference call with the Attorney General who delivered the same message to us” about leaks, with specific focus being on leaks regarding the high-profile investigation by FBI’s New York Field Office into the death of Eric Garner. McCabe told us that he “never heard her use more forceful language.” NY-ADIC confirmed that the participants got “ripped by the AG on leaks.”

According to NY-ADIC’s testimony and an e-mail he sent to himself on October 31, McCabe indicated to NY-ADIC and a then-FBI Executive Assistant Director (“EAD”) in a conversation after Attorney General Lynch disconnected from the call that McCabe was recusing himself from the CF Investigation.

(Page #6 and #7 – IG Report Link)

What makes this explosive is the timing and how reporting in 2016 was explaining this specific call and the outcome therein.

On September 28th, 2016, Andrew McCabe was made aware of information the New York Police Department and FBI has obtained from a captured laptop belonging to Huma Abedin and Anthony Weiner.  The laptop was evidence in the Weiner “sexting” case involving a minor; however, the laptop also contained thousands of State Department documents from Hillary Clinton and her aide Huma Abedin, Weiner’s wife.

Some of the extracted laptop evidence was turned over to the DOJ Southern District of New York (SDNY) where Preet Bharara, a Clinton-Lynch ally, is United States Attorney.

Text messages between FBI Agent Peter Strzok (Inbox) and FBI Special Counsel to Andrew McCabe, Lisa Page (Outbox):

[The letter to “Congress” at the end of the text exchange relates to notification of the re-opening of the Clinton investigation – Actual date of notification 10/28/16]

According to later reporting, FBI Director James Comey was not notified of the laptop issues for two to three weeks, after 9/28/16.   However, in late October and early November, there were reports from people with contacts in New York police and FBI, about Washington DOJ officials interfering with the Weiner laptop investigation.

On the same date (October 26th, 2016) as the Lynch, McCabe and NY FBI phone call, former NY Mayor Rudy Giuilani was telling Fox News that an explosive development was forthcoming.   Two days later, October 28th, 2016, Congress was notified of the additional Clinton emails.

However, a few more days later, November 4th, 2016, an even more explosive development as Erik Prince appeared on radio and outlined discoveries within the Huma Abedin/Anthony Weiner laptop that was being blocked by AG Lynch.

Prince claimed he had insider knowledge of the investigation that could help explain why FBI Director James Comey had to announce he was reopening the investigation into Clinton’s email server last week.

“Because of Weinergate and the sexting scandal, the NYPD started investigating it. Through a subpoena, through a warrant, they searched his laptop, and sure enough, found those 650,000 emails. They found way more stuff than just more information pertaining to the inappropriate sexting the guy was doing,” Prince claimed.

“They found State Department emails. They found a lot of other really damning criminal information, including money laundering, including the fact that Hillary went to this sex island with convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Bill Clinton went there more than 20 times. Hillary Clinton went there at least six times,” he said.

“The amount of garbage that they found in these emails, of criminal activity by Hillary, by her immediate circle, and even by other Democratic members of Congress was so disgusting they gave it to the FBI, and they said, ‘We’re going to go public with this if you don’t reopen the investigation and you don’t do the right thing with timely indictments,’” Prince explained.

“I believe – I know, and this is from a very well-placed source of mine at 1PP, One Police Plaza in New York – the NYPD wanted to do a press conference announcing the warrants and the additional arrests they were making in this investigation, and they’ve gotten huge pushback, to the point of coercion, from the Justice Department, with the Justice Department threatening to charge someone that had been unrelated in the accidental heart attack death of Eric Garner almost two years ago. That’s the level of pushback the Obama Justice Department is doing against actually seeking justice in the email and other related criminal matters,” Prince said. (Link)

An earlier Grand Jury in New York had refused to return an indictment against the police in the Garner case.  As an outcome of that grand jury finding, and as an outcome of their own investigation, the local FBI office and Eastern District of New York DOJ office was not trying to pursue criminal charges against the NYPD officers involved.  This created a dispute because federal prosecutors and FBI officials in New York opposed bringing charges, while prosecutors with the Civil Rights Division at the Justice Department in Washington argued there was clear evidence to do so.

On October 25th, 2016, Loretta Lynch replaced the New York prosecutors:

New York Times (Oct. 25)  – The Justice Department has replaced the New York team of agents and lawyers investigating the death of Eric Garner, officials said, a highly unusual shake-up that could jump-start the long-stalled case and put the government back on track to seek criminal charges.

With that move on Oct. 25th, 2016, AG Lynch was now in position to threaten criminal prosecutions against the NYPD, and repercussions against the NY FBI and EDNY using the Garner case as leverage, just like Erik Prince outlined in the phone interview above.

Additionally, we see confirmation from the IG report, the Garner case was brought up in the next day (Oct 26, 2016) phone call to the NY FBI field office; just as Erik Prince outlined.  Obviously Prince’s sources were close to the events as they unfolded.

The NY FBI and Eastern District of New York (EDNY) were threatened by Washington DC Main Justice and FBI, via Loretta Lynch and Andrew McCabe to drop the Clinton/Abedin/Weiner laptop investigation matters, or else the Garner DOJ Civil Rights Division would be used as leverage against the NYPD.  And Loretta Lynch had SDNY U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara as the enforcer waiting for her call.

And so it was…

“Had it become public, the unverified material would undoubtedly have been used by political opponents to cast serious doubt on the attorney general’s independence in connection with the Clinton investigation,” Comey writes, according to ABC. He calls the material a “development still unknown to the American public to this day.” (ABC Link)

.

Additionally, this excerpt from the Comey book is laughable:

“I never heard anyone on our team — not one — take a position that seemed driven by their personal political motivations. And more than that: I never heard an argument or observation I thought came from a political bias. Never,” Comey writes in his book. “Instead we debated, argued, listened, reflected, agonized, played devil’s advocate, and even found opportunities to laugh as we hashed out major decisions.” (LINK)

Lastly, I cannot help but be reminded of a post-election event where an FBI official from the same NY field office had her vehicle broken into and a laptop stolen which included “National Security information“.  Everything was recovered, except the laptop.

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Clinton(s), Conspiracy ?, Death Threats, Decepticons, Deep State, Dept Of Justice, Desperately Seeking Hillary, Donald Trump, FBI, Jeff Sessions, media bias, New York, Notorious Liars, President Trump, Professional Idiots, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

1,258 Responses to Trail of James Comey’s Dirt on Loretta Lynch Discovered Within IG Report on Andrew McCabe…

  1. Donzo says:

    Also, have you noticed how often he uses the phrase “I don’t know the answer to that”? He was responding to an question about ethics, whether it was the right thing to do to tell Trump that Hillary paid for the Dossier. He teaches a course in Ethics.

    Liked by 22 people

    • ablefox says:

      Social Justice

      Liked by 2 people

      • MGBSE says:

        …FBI car broken into and laptop stolen…FBI car broken into and gun stolen…it is becoming clear that the FBI did not miss or ignore all the terrorist attacks & mass murders during obamas 8 years and now into Trumps 1st year – the FBI has and is ONLY protecting 24/7 the coverup of the Obamas and Clintons lies, secrets, treason, crimes & immoral behavior from being revealed.

        Liked by 5 people

      • slothb77 says:

        to the left, social justice comes before constitutional justice. we all know what the left thinks of the constitution.

        Liked by 2 people

    • Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

      As a typical leftist, Comey considers all ethics to be a gray area. Their notion of right and wrong always hinges on politics as they have no Aristotelian philosophical base. And as evidenced by his admission of having close family members wander the streets protesting an election result, he also has no Judeo/Christian philosophical base either.

      Liked by 15 people

    • Republicanvet91 says:

      If I recall all he said about this, and it is the same as what you are referencing, it tells me more about him being a political hack than anything about his ethics.

      I believe at the time, they were claiming that the dossier had not yet been verified.

      If Comey did not know whether any of the dossier was true or not, why did he not treat it as a national security threat. Some false facts being circulated to undermine Trump. Why would he not open an investigation into the information regardless of whether it was true or not to verify any possible threat? One would assume the FBI would be interested in knowing whether any type of information like this on either political party would be true or not.

      The reason Comey did none of this was because he knew without a doubt it was paid political opposition and laundered intelligence.He knew it was a political hit from the left and had nothing to do with anything Trump may have done.

      He also knew there was no national security threat from an attack that was purely political.

      Liked by 30 people

      • Raven says:

        Exactly, Republicanvet91,

        The meeting was to update Trump.
        Comey was happy enough to say the dossier was “salacious & unverified” but not who paid for it.
        Another “lack of candor” moment . .

        Liked by 11 people

        • The Demon Slick says:

          By briefing Trump the dossier went from garbage to something The President was briefed on by the FBI director. Comey gave it credibility, made it official. Then the enemedia could print it and talk about it. That was the purpose, Comey was advancing the deep state plan.

          Liked by 18 people

        • lotbusyexec says:

          The meeting with Trump was to “threaten him”. Comey cleared the room and one on one told PDJT about a “report” out there regarding him and prostitutes… A report Comey KNEW to be false. He was trying to say, “Hey, I have this is my back pocket and I got something over you” — very mob like.

          Liked by 3 people

          • PS says:

            The media assumes Trump is the mobster in the one-on-one, but you make a good point, it is just as applicable the other way around. Comey is the one who thought he had the leverage, and I’m sure they have allegation’d their way into controlling politicians before. But everyone acted as if Trump were born yesterday, never having been in government and having “excessive expectations”. They forget that boots on the ground construction, in NYC, is about as political as you can get. Trump probably knew that instant what he was up against in the FBI.

            Liked by 2 people

        • Retired USMC says:

          No..the meeting was to strong arm Trump…that is why telling him about the source was not a priority. In fact, it would have been counter productive…no…Comey was looking for LEVERAGE…he was putting the POTUS on NOTICE. This was an ATTACK, not an FYI. This is how the swamp works..leverage.

          Liked by 4 people

      • BAM… you nailed it… I wondered the same thing?
        Why is Comey making like it was odd for Trump to be asking him to determine the source and route from which these allegations had originated?

        Call me stupid… however, I would have thought this would have been a perfectly reasonable to question to not only ask but to demand of my intel agencies… are you kidding me?
        The question he asked was the most relevant question which could have been asked, given the assumption Comey was making was that this was out there and therefore someone could use it against you.
        The most relevant question seems stupid to comey because he knew it was all BS and knew where it came from… So he couldn’t exactly tell him the truth could he?

        Liked by 14 people

      • Comedy is obviously insane, a treasonous SOB, probably some kind of sexual deviant and should never have been allowed to have the power that he was given by his evil Swamp Masters.

        This freak is not fit to tie Donald Trump’s shoelaces, yet he is being presented by the MSM as a hero/ victim! How the hell does that work?

        Thank God for sending us the one man in His creation who is able to withstand the Satanic evil that is being thrown at our POTUS and our Country.

        And I do mean Satanic. The more I read about the likes of these Swamp creatures, their pride and arrogance, the more I am convinced that there is great evil of the highest order afoot in the land.

        Let us pray and be ever vigilant.

        Liked by 3 people

    • 4beagles says:

      I did, he’s a giant sized narcissistic worm .
      “Me, Myself and I” would have more appropriate on his book cover.

      Liked by 4 people

    • slothb77 says:

      sundance doing the lord’s work.

      Liked by 2 people

    • slothb77 says:

      And let us not forget that while McCabe is leaking to the press, then castigating his underlings for his leaks; while also hiding investigations from Comey; that while Lynch is meeting on the tarmac with the spouses of targets of investigations and threatening the NYPD all of these people were neglecting actual terror cases and potential mass shooters. While all of this is going on, the Parkland shooter is being ignored. Just mind-boggling.

      Liked by 2 people

  2. rsmith1776 says:

    James Comey is a misogynist and a racist.

    He persecutes the innocent Loretta Lynch, just because this blushing, pure magnolia happens to be black and a female.

    On the other hand, Lynch is a more insidious kind of oppressor, picking on Jamelle Comey, a more sophisticated minority, as the tallest transgendered lesbian dwarf in the entire Obamadom.

    Who’s winning here?

    Henry Kissinger [too bad they cannot both lose… or can they?] comes to mind.

    OR CAN THEY ? ? ?

    Liked by 14 people

    • pnj01 says:

      Comey is also a SIZE-IST. As we all know, he is 6 foot 8 inches tall and he makes a mocking remark in his book about how Trump was smaller than he thought he would be. That is not the first time Comey has made disparaging remarks about people’s size. About a month ago, he tweeted in defense of his side (Andy McCabe, in particular, if memory serves) that the people against McCabe were “little people.” What does size have to do with it…unless one is a size-ist like Comey constantly looking down their noses at people less than 6 foot 6(?) or so?

      Liked by 9 people

    • suejeanne1 says:

      Last Monday (April 9th) in the morning, Loretta Lynch was giving an interview which sounded to me like she was trying to cover herself and then the news that same morning about the FBI raid on Michael Cohen which of course dominated the news for the rest of the day – was the raid for the purpose of distracting from any differences there might be between Comey and Lynch which might reflect badly on Mueller?

      Liked by 4 people

    • Addison Gooding says:

      Innocent Loretta Lynch??!! LOL to the tenth power. The Matter rather than the investigation; so called discussion about grand children with Bill; todays allogations about Weiner, Garner and stand down orders; and a Obama appointee to boot.

      Like

  3. Pam says:

    Liked by 28 people

  4. Pam says:

    Liked by 12 people

  5. Landslide says:

    Can’t wait to see President’s Trump’s tweet/s about this interview!!

    Liked by 7 people

  6. Keith maloney says:

    Just an observation I read that Nader’s attorney is Obama’s White House attorney. But nothing to see there. I key witness for mueller and he’s being represented by the person who fixed the irs scandal. The optical there doesn’t look good. But I’m wondering if what was on that Weiner computer was black mail evidence for these people to use at there will. No better way to keep a person in check than with a felony charge if you don’t do what they want and Ruemmler there to make sure Nader says what they want. And seeing he’s the guy who step up the two meetings with Russians supposedly they may have had him in there pockets the whole time.

    Like

  7. jeans2nd says:

    Comey testified to Congress about the Guiliani “leaking.”
    In one of those Congressional hearings, Comey was asked by one of the Senators or Reps, one from NY iirc, if anything was being done to address Guiliani’s “leaking.”

    Comey answered in the affirmative. This Congressional Q&A of Comey in a Congressional hearing is documented in an earlier comment of mine; good luck finding that now.
    Guess this necessitates a re-listen of the Comey hearings (sigh).

    Eric Prince notes the involvement of Democratic Congressmen at 01:48 in the Breitbart interview.
    Tracy Beanz mentions the Guiliani “leak” and shows the Fox vid with Guiliani mentioning a big surprise coming.

    There is an alternative explanation re: the Cohen raid –
    “What the Cohen case, and the filing by the USAO-SDNY, determines, imo, is that this is a trial to establish precedence for the trial(s) of the “Small Group,” and the actions having been, and being, undertaken by AG Jeff and IG Horowitz.”

    “Additionally, this USAO-SDNY court filing is the Clinton email trial…with Cohen as the stand-in for Clinton, being argued in Clinton’s own home district” to establish precedence with a judicial ruling. https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/04/13/the-small-group-knew-theyd-lose-the-fact-battle-so-they-began-a-propaganda-war/comment-page-3/#comment-5252381

    Add these two – Comey Congressional testimony plus the alternate Cohen explanation – to the info provided in the Tracy Beanz vid and the Prince-Breitbart interview, and one has a very good case that things are not going where Fake News is trying to make it go, which is that Pres Trump and Michael Cohen are in big trouble.

    To the contrary, it would appear that the Clinton Foundation and quite possibly Crooked H herself may be heading into trouble. Bigly. Along with many lesser Swamp Dwellers. Fake News Propoganda War may in fact just be a Battle, not the War.

    Also, if it was a NY Congressman that asked Comey about the Guiliani “leaking,” it may be that the reference in the Eric Prince-Breitbart interview to Congressmen being involved is more reason why Mueller and Cabal are actually protecting not only the “Small Group,” but some Congressmen as well, with Congress protecting their own. imo

    No wonder production of DOJ docs is going so slowly.
    To repeat, Lynch is the fixer, not Michael Cohen.
    Now the question is, who of the lesser Swamp Dwellers will cut a deal to take out the Big Dogs?
    Comey.

    Liked by 5 people

    • ablefox says:

      Not bad. We getting warm. it is much worse though.

      Liked by 3 people

    • albrevin says:

      no wonder so many Congresscritters are prattling on and on about sacred Mueller as a must have….. no more Russian collusion…. just Mueller must be protected at all costs. No wonder so many have left stage right. W/O Mueller there must be a boatload of these Congresscritters and Senators completely with no rear-guard. Bet the ambivalent ones are merely ambivalent b/c their buddies are leaning on them real hard.

      Liked by 8 people

      • The “development still unknown to the American public” explains way more than just hatred for the President, the deplorables, and why the left has to be in control. The “lolita express” email evidence on Weiner’s laptop, if it does and still exists, will make people disappear. Comey better take his royalties and run, prosecution of any crimes should be the least of his worries.

        Like

        • SJM says:

          CPB: RE:The “lolita express” email evidence on Weiner’s laptop, if it does and still exists, will make people disappear. Comey better take his royalties and run, prosecution of any crimes should be the least of his worries.

          The mysterious disappearance and death of former DCI William Colby has been linked to his public stand on high-level pedo rings.

          WHO MURDERED THE CIA CHIEF?

          William E. Colby: A Highly Suspicious Death
          By Zalin Grant
          This was Saturday, April 27, 1996. William Colby, a former director of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, was alone at his weekend house across from Cobb Island, Maryland, 60 miles south of Washington, D.C. Colby, who was 76 years old, had worked all day on his sailboat at a nearby marina, putting it in shape for the coming summer.

          After he got home from the marina, Colby called his wife, Sally Shelton, a high-ranking State Department official who was in Houston, Texas, visiting her mother. He told her that he had worked hard all day and was tired. He said he was going to steam some clams, take a shower, and go to bed.

          Colby made the call at 7 p.m. He was seen a few minutes later by two sets of witnesses in his yard watering a willow tree. One of the witnesses was his gardener who dropped by to introduce his visiting sister. His two next-door neighbors saw him at the same time from their window. After he finished watering his trees, he went inside and had dinner.

          The witnesses saw him at 7:15 p.m. The sun set at 7:57—42 minutes later.

          When he was found dead in the water nine days later, it was said that he had gone out paddling his canoe at nightfall and drowned. I was in Paris when I read the story in the International Herald Tribune. I knew William Colby. And I didn’t believe that for one second. …CONT’D:
          http://www.pythiapress.com/wartales/colby.htm

          Liked by 1 person

    • Electra says:

      There really was no upside for Comey to mention Loretta Lynch’s mysterious issue. But, perhaps, by putting it in his book, he’s sending a message to Obama’s inner circle: “You’d better not throw me under the bus, because I know where your skeletons are buried.”

      Liked by 10 people

      • Karl Kastner says:

        While simultaneously an attempt to show that he didn’t favor Hillary’s side, anticipating the house of cards coming down.

        Speaking of cards. Sundance could make a deck of conspirator cards, like for Saddam’s regime.

        Liked by 2 people

      • farrier105 says:

        I don’t think that is a wise strategy on Comey’s part. Does he not know with what kind of people he is dealing?

        Like

    • noswamp says:

      Not sure if Comey is a lesser Swamp Dweller, but if he cuts a deal and we get to Lynch and Rica and Brenan, then I’m not going to be angry. I doubt it though. Comey gives me the sense that he is going down with the ship like McCabe. Give him his money. He is now forced to stick with what he wrote. Such a person can’t be flipped unless you hit him with stuff we all don’t know about but just him and the gvt.

      Liked by 3 people

      • noswamp says:

        Sorry, Rice not Rica.

        Like

      • Lou Foxwell says:

        I do not agree. Trump is correct about Comey. He is a slimeball. er will do and say anything that protects his precious backside. Te only ship Comey is concerned about is the one he captains.

        Like

        • Perot Conservative says:

          He spends a lot of time worrying about his ego? What a nutter!

          He has a wife and 5 children! Pull your head out of your rectum!

          Oh yeah, he prosecuted Martha Stewart. Ego?

          Joe diGenova says his FBI nickname is Cardinal Comey.

          Liked by 1 person

          • jello333 says:

            I never like Martha Stewart, until they went after her over basically nothing. Similar to how I felt about Paula Dean… never liked her, until they attacked her for nothing more than being an honest human, at which point I was totally on her side.

            Like

    • jeans2nd says:

      The Senator questioning Comey re: Clinton email leaks was Patrick Leahey at the Senate Judiciary Cmte 5 May 2017, 01:10:41. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jgicFDtavks

      Leahey asked Comey specifically about Rudy Guiliani and James Kallstrom receiving leaks from current and former FBI agents.
      Comey replied that “they were looking into it” and there would be “severe consequences.”
      Lynch decided to turn that investigation on the NYPD.
      —>>>Lynch is the fixer.

      At the same hearing , 03:27:18, Comey, under questioning from Sen Sheldon Whitehouse, was asked if the consequences of the disclosure of classiified information was considered in deciding whether to prosecute. Comey answered in the affirmative. ???

      Yet the DOJ put a Navy sailor in jail for some durn pics that no one saw that also caused no harm.
      Double standard? Or just a desire to persecute our military?

      Like

  8. RLC2 says:

    Wondered when this would finally hit daylight again- I recalled that outrage by the NYPD that FBI DC did not want the missing HRC emails they found on Huma’s laptop, and threatened to release them. And the sudden silence that fell over the story as the media covered it with a pillow…

    So, Lynch threatened to prosecute someone(s) on the Garnder case unless NYPD shut up, eh…
    And McCabe sat on them, and apparently Comey is claiming hid that from him…riggghhhhttt…

    You know what they say, its not the crime, its the cover-up.
    Great citizen journalism, Tracy-

    More popcorn, faster please..

    Liked by 18 people

    • WES says:

      I wonder who and what Trump will be tweeting about Monday morning! Can’t wait to see who he skewers next!

      Liked by 2 people

    • blind no longer says:

      RLC, black lives really do matter, especially when Loretta Lynch can use them to blackmail the police and FBI. What must Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton be thinking???

      Liked by 2 people

    • Electra says:

      Wasn’t this the issue that almost got Judge Napolitano fired from Fox News? He was quoting the stuff that was coming out of the NYPD, and Fox didn’t like that. I desperately hope this thing blows wide open, and the Murdochs end up eating serious crow.

      Liked by 7 people

    • pmdea says:

      “And McCabe sat on them, and apparently Comey is claiming hid that from him…riggghhhhttt:

      McCabe sat on the laptop – he needed a booster seat too, like Zuckerberg had for his congressional hearing…….but it also helped hide the emails from Comey…

      That is the story of the FBI. The END. Laugh or cry folks.

      Liked by 2 people

      • nanny210 says:

        @pmdea: Thanks alot! Now I have a mental image of McCabe sitting on Weenie’s laptop that you REALLY don’t want me to explain!! LMAO!

        Like

  9. ezpz2 says:

    Oh Lordy, that interview made me more than just slightly nauseous!

    And what’s with his ridiculous valley girl style inflections, ending his sentences as though they were questions?

    Liked by 7 people

  10. Doug B says:

    My hunch is that the Lynch/Clinton tarmac meeting was demanded by Clinton because He wanted the NYPD investigation into Wiener Laptop be squashed, because the Clinton’s knew what was on it. Huma knew, so Hillary knew. Everything related to Lynch came from this discussion. All the leaks were coming from the NYPD and they could do nothing about it.

    Liked by 9 people

    • Bigdog35 says:

      The Wiener laptop was not seized or investigated by the NYPD for almost 3 months after the tarmac meeting.

      Like

    • Doppler says:

      Very interesting possibility, DougB. Do we know when the Weiner laptop was seized? I recall some account by which Bill Clinton forced the tarmac meeting with Lynch to intimidate her, and to get a copy of the questions HRC would be asked (meeting on the eve of her being questioned), which seemed plausible. You’ve suggested an alternate, or additional, agenda item for the meeting. Certainly, as soon as Weiner’s laptop was seized, a high alert (oh, shit!!) would have run through the Clinton Crime Machine. A timeline would be helpful here.

      Like

    • farrier105 says:

      The NYPD leaks were squelched in the MSM. That kept it from the majority of the people. The access of leaks to the MSM can always be controlled by those people.

      Like

      • Perot Conservative says:

        1. Recall what we learned from just ONE email account!

        2. OIG reportedly has all McCabe’s texts, probably all texts from all key players.

        3. Does NSA / FBI / IT have the capability to store / retrieve instant messages?

        Like

        • farrier105 says:

          1. If you are referring to “Screech” Weiner’s email account, we still haven’t heard all about it. If Page, et. al.’s yes, we learned a lot, but Page and Peter boy are still running around with security clearances.

          2. McCabe’s texts haven’t been revealed to us yet, and some might never be without extensive redactions.

          3. All three have the capability of storing instant messages, but I refer once again to the video tapes from the Murrah Building bombing, not to mention security footage from the Federal Transfer Facility in Oklahoma City the night Kenneth Trentadue was tortured and murdered in his cell by “unknown subjects.”

          Like

    • You left out the L.Lynch nomination to the S.C.

      Like

  11. Kis says:

    Amazing summary!!

    Liked by 1 person

  12. ablefox says:

    Seems like at least 75 percent of the inside the beltway crowd and media will have to be detained and tried for various nefarious schemes if the ball ever gets rolling. No wonder they are above the law.

    Liked by 8 people

  13. ablefox says:

    I guess the way to make 10 mil is to be a lunatic, SJW KUKU an write a book. Holy Mackerel.

    Liked by 6 people

  14. Deplorable_Vespucciland says:

    Poor disgruntled ex-employee is going full speed ahead into the fog.
    Socialist democrats… we are patiently waiting for them to accept reality.
    Or not.

    Still, time and truth is on our side. M A G A

    Liked by 7 people

  15. IMAGINE
    Comey, OBAMA, Hillary, lost an election they and their criminal networks and organizations rigged..

    how stupid can they be ::::

    they and all of the power of the US government rigged an election and they lost to the people …..

    Liked by 11 people

  16. ablefox says:

    Hello….Is this Port Royal? We need a berth. Inbound from Tortuga.

    Liked by 1 person

  17. Electra says:

    Other than jazzing-up his manuscript, there doesn’t seem to be any good reason for Comey to mention the Loretta Lynch mystery issue. Why draw attention to something that the Obama team most certainly wants to keep secret? Unless…Comey is sending a message to Obama’s inner circle that they better not try to make him the fall-guy. He knows where the bodies are buried.

    Liked by 4 people

  18. NormB says:

    Google “Loretta Lynch AND HSBC”. As district AG for NY she covered up the Clinton Crime Family Foundation’s money laundering with HSBC and was rewarded handsomly for it; actually she was OWNED by the Clinton machine and was put in the US AG’s position where she could be watched and put to good use. Or at least a reasonable review would lead one to believe.

    Liked by 9 people

  19. The most dangerous time for our Republic is when the previous administration and a selected candidate with her political party collaborate with the FBI, NSC, DOJ, IRS, EPA, Media etc to thwart American growth and the American peoples’ choice for president.

    THEY rigged an election and still believe they had a right to rig that election against the people ’s vote…

    Comey does not get to decide what we want or what is good for the PEOPLE. OBAMA Comey’s FBI, lied, leaked, cheated, manipulated, colluded, engaged in conspiracies, fraud, and forgery to rig an election or destroy TRUMP for winning.

    Liked by 7 people

  20. CA M says:

    POTUS is tweeting about Loretta Lynch and the Tarmac. Why? There is some Intel out there that the meeting on the Tarmac was a possible conference call with HRC and that it was recorded. The video is of them negotiating for a SCOTUS position for Lynch in exchange for making the email scandal go away. When the dirt on the Weiner/Huma laptop wasn’t released (by FBI), the people who had the video (or knew where it was stored) revealed this to Comey. The election was imminent. Because they threatened to release this video, Comey had to re-open the case. THAT is what he is referring to in the ABC article. It is getting ready to be dropped.

    Liked by 13 people

    • As I understand it, the reason why the investigation was opened and re-shut a few days later was to clear the way for Hillary to rule us peons untarnished by ongoing criminal investigations.

      As to the tarmac video, if it exists it would not surprise me that it was used by the white hats in government to ensure the peaceful handover of power to Trump. If it exists, it would also explain why Trump has not had any “Arkancide” attempts made on him. It would be Trump’s DMS. The fighting going on in public between the black hats and the white hats would then be, among other things, about removal of people who could carry out an Arkancide, thus clearing the way to bring the recording into the larger public consciousness.

      Liked by 2 people

    • @ CA M
      I also posted his on the Open Thread today.

      Praying Medic talks about PDJT’s Tarmac Tweet. In light of all that is going on, PM’s take is compelling:
      Tfump tweets and the Tarmac Meeting

      Liked by 5 people

      • digleigh says:

        I saw the picture of Mike Rogers talking about Adm. Rogers, etc….! This is a different man than Admiral Rogers!! We need to distinguish, as IMHO, Mike Rogers is deepstate….

        Like

    • farrier105 says:

      Did Comey make the decision on his own to make it public, or did all the group agree to it. If he did it on his own, Comey must be a very lonely man right now. His height works against him in this situation, too.

      Liked by 1 person

  21. sallyal says:

    IIRC, last month VSGPDJT announced there would be a major announcement from him around April 19. That’s Thursday!

    Liked by 1 person

  22. scott467 says:

    “McCabe told the OIG that he “had some heated back-and-forths” with the New York Assistant Director in Charge (“NY-ADIC”) over the issue of media leaks.”

    _____________________

    What, McCabe was angry because the NY-ADIC wasn’t doing it right, so McCabe called to give the MY-ADIC some tips and pointers?

    Like

  23. The Demon Slick says:

    And Comey did nothing, which makes him complicit.

    Like

  24. I hope the white hats at EDNY made copies of Weiner’s laptop hard drive and got those copies to Sessions’ DOJ.

    Not surprised that the Obama DOJ/FBI would “lose” the original laptop, but it should have been SOP to create and secure copies. Especially given the national security implications.

    “We have it all” via Qanon means the good guys did indeed get a copy?

    Liked by 5 people

  25. Bastiat says:

    After the Reason subpoena, I can’t even stand to see Preet Bharara’s name. What a scumbag.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Srateshooter says:

      Bahasa was also the guy who gave a visa to the banned Rus lawyer chick who met with DT Jr in Trump Twr.In retrospect the meeting was a total set up to snare Jr.
      This guy Bahera is a total swamp rat.He is in this thing up to his neck.

      Like

  26. scott467 says:

    “The NY FBI and Eastern District of New York (EDNY) were threatened by Washington DC Main Justice and FBI, via Loretta Lynch and Andrew McCabe to drop the Clinton/Abedin/Weiner laptop investigation matters, or else the Garner DOJ Civil Rights Division would be used as leverage against the NYPD. ”

    ____________________

    Ummm….. that is textbook obstruction of justice AND blackmail AND abuse of power and authority AND prosecutorial misconduct AND conspiracy to obstruct justice, and that’s just for starters.

    Liked by 7 people

    • Countrywatch says:

      Quite staggering, and yet they (the villains of the piece) are acting as though they will not be brought to justice. A rude awakening for them when they realise that not all politicians are corrupt like they are and will not be bought. I believe that when it becomes abundantly clear that they are going to be prosecuted, many other individuals who have been threatened by the key players will feel free to start talking.

      Liked by 1 person

  27. scott467 says:

    “According to ABC News Comey writes in “A Higher Loyalty: Truth, Lies and Leadership,” ”

    ___________

    Higher?

    Considering his position, he must be referring to the eighth circle of hell?

    Liked by 1 person

  28. Hillyard says:

    It would be very hard to believe with all of the political pressure being put on the NYPD regarding the Wiener investigation that they wouldn’t have made several copies of the hard drive. Out of 650K emails it would also stand to reason some if not all of Cankel’s 33k emails she thought were gone are not gone at all. Those emails alone would be the road map to Obamma and the whole corrupt gang. Lets hope the right people do have them Those emails would blow up the whole Democrat party and set the Mueller scam on it’s rear.

    Liked by 1 person

  29. scott467 says:

    “The amount of garbage that they found in these emails, of criminal activity by Hillary, by her immediate circle, and even by other Democratic members of Congress was so disgusting they gave it to the FBI, and they said, ‘We’re going to go public with this if you don’t reopen the investigation and you don’t do the right thing with timely indictments,’” Prince explained.

    ______________________

    When they say ‘disgusting’, they’re talking about Pedo stuff. Sexually abusing children, human trafficking, ‘pizza parties’, etc.

    What other ‘crimes’ would cause hardened police officers to use words like ‘disgusting’? They’ve seen everything. It takes a LOT to disgust someone who has spent a career dealing with the worst aspects of society and human nature.

    They’re not referring to picking your feet in Poughkeepsie.

    To use the word ‘disgusting’ and demanding ‘timely indictments’, in the context of Weinergate and all the evidence of human trafficking related to the Clintons and their slush-funds, has to be pedophile stuff.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Perot Conservative says:

      Right now, unproven allegations.

      Surprised Eric Prince commented publicly 18 months ago. No follow up?

      Like

    • Scarlet says:

      I can’t imagine what the NYPD would find to be disgusting. Makes me shiver.

      Liked by 1 person

    • harleyd says:

      As much as I want Hillary and all her minions to pay for their criminality, something here doesn’t add up.

      Why would the NYPD, with incontrovertible visual (tape) evidence of child sex abuse, let the abusers run free for months on end.

      Wouldn’t the NYPD have massive legal liability for failing to take known criminals off the street and thus endangering future victims?

      Does not compute.

      Like

  30. scott467 says:

    Sundance: “.@PreetBharara I don’t think you are looking at this right. AG Lynch was threatening to take the case and give it to you. YOU were the threat Lynch was using against the EDNY [who she (and McCabe) saw as a risk]. So what does that say about you? ”

    ______________

    Bull’s-eye!

    Very nicely done!

    Liked by 6 people

  31. Eris says:

    I would think that President Trump & his team including Michael Cohen should have been prepared to deal with things like wiretapping or raids from either the unfriendly SDNY (even though Preet Bharara was replaced) or the unfriendly NYAG Eric Schneiderman.

    Like

  32. John Rawls says:

    The WSJ article that reference by Eric Prince is well worth a read. You can find it around the internet by searching for some of the text or the title.

    Article does good job of explaining the clever ways McCabe compartmentalized and controlled the Clinton Foundation and Email probes. He’s a crafty SOB.

    Excerpt…

    FBI in Internal Feud over Hillary Clinton Probe – Oct 31, 2016

    For McCabe’s defenders, the exchange showed how he was stuck between an FBI office eager to pour more resources into a case and Justice Department prosecutors who didn’t think much of the case, one person said. Those people said that following the call, McCabe reiterated past instructions to FBI agents that they were to keep pursuing the work within the authority they had.

    Others further down the FBI chain of command, however, said agents were given a much starker instruction on the case: “Stand down.” When agents questioned why they weren’t allowed to take more aggressive steps, they said they were told the order had come from the deputy director McCabe.

    Like

    • kevin king says:

      One thing this report shows, Mccabe and Comey ain’t on one another’s christmas card lists anymore.From a footnote on page 25
      McCabe argues that “the OIG should credit Mr. McCabe’s account over Director Comey’s” and complains that the report “paints Director Comey as a white knight carefully guarding FBI information, while overlooking that Mr. McCabe’s account is more credible for at least three key reasons. . . .”

      Like

  33. It’s shocking to learn AG Loretta Lynch threatened her own former colleagues like this. After all, Lynch was the U.S. Attorney for EDNY before she was elevated to AG. She held that post for 5 years. She must’ve been some kind of witch to work for. Not only do they treat conservatives like 💩, they treat each other like 💩 too. This is Justice under the Obama Administration!

    Like

  34. David Zink says:

    They agonized, joked, laughed and cried, but did they ever follow the law?

    Liked by 4 people

  35. jello333 says:

    I’ve read Sundance’s post but haven’t had time to read through the comments yet, so this question may have already been asked. Why hasn’t NYPD released the laptop info they were threatened to keep quiet about, now that the threat is no longer there?

    But here, I’ll take a shot at answering my own question. Could it be because as soon as Trump was elected, NYPD knew the wheels of justice would soon be turning again and so they were willing to bide their time while the new guys (Team Trump) got up to speed? If so, that would also mean that Trump has known about all this all along, maybe as early as Nov ’16. And THAT would likely mean he’s known EVERYTHING since then. Major implications right there.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Patriot1783 says:

      And who’s laptop really was it? Remember one of Clinton laptops went missing/misplaced/lost in 2015/16 during the discovery process of her illegal server. Funny enough a laptop with thousands of specific Clinton and state emails was found during the search of wieners apartment relating to a completely unrelated case to hers.
      Could Clinton have given her computer (which I imagine would house major blackmail information on govt officials (like obama) for even corresponding to her on unregulated/official White House email addresses) trusted aid Huma for safekeeping never dreaming it would be searched coz the FBI was so compromised but hadn’t contemplated the NYPD would fully do their job in their investigation of wiener.

      Liked by 2 people

    • kevin king says:

      That’s the one thing that makes me doubt this. Everything else sort of fits. But I cannot believe the NYPD simply would not have gone public with it straight after the election.They had the evidence. If is was that damning any threats from the Justice Department to start prosecuting NYPD officers would not have been tenable.

      Like

    • Mary Morse says:

      Laptop would be evidence. This incident prompted the IG investigation. It’s referenced in a letter. Let me find the link…

      Like

  36. Pyrthroes says:

    Once you realize who you’re dealing with, where their true interests lie, it’s plain that the very last thing on these Deep State hirelings’ minds [we speak metaphorically] was to do their plain duty as fiduciary oaths-of-one-syllable prescribe.

    How naive can tomfool private citizens be, who pay these lampreys’ self-awarded salaries in expectation of minimal respect for law? The real chokehold here was not just on Eric Garner but on American “justice”– thanks Loretta, Carlos and Huma-duma, MzBill and Jeremy Epstein’s merry band. This seething mass of mealworms cares zip-squat for anything, anything at all, until the spotlight of self-dealing hyper-partisan corruption turns on them.

    Liked by 2 people

  37. mikgen says:

    Question: I noticed in the WSJ piece from 30 Oct 2016 “FBI in Internal Feud Over Hillary Clinton Probe” the at Andy McCabe was promoted from #3 in the FBI to Deputy Director of FBI early February 2016:
    “In February of this year, McCabe ascended from the No. 3 position at the FBI to the deputy director post. When he assumed that role, officials say, he started overseeing the probe into Clinton’s use of a private email server for government work when she was secretary of state.”
    Internet search shows that the previous DD FBI was Mark F. Giuliano. Was he “White Hat”? Was he scheduled to retire that date or was he pushed?

    Like

    • covfefe999 says:

      Good question. What happened to Giuliano. Was he pushed out or did he leave on his own? It would be easy to assume he was pushed out to ensure that #2 was someone who wanted Clinton to be exonerated.

      Like

    • mariposa323 says:

      Thinking out loud . Is it possible Michael Cohen’s office was raided in connection to the Weiner files ? Did he maybe have a copy ?

      Like

  38. zephyrbreeze says:

    When we know the whole truth, all the pieces will fit together perfectly.

    Like

  39. Bulldog84 says:

    The Eric Garner story explains in part why Lynch had to get out ahead of both Comey’s book and the IG report. She’s out of DOJ and therefore has little to fear from the IG, but is she worried that she could be prosecuted in NY for obstruction?

    I wonder what the Garner family thinks of this situation — that DOJ did a “stand down” in that case for the benefit of Hillary?

    Like

  40. itsy_bitsy says:

    The name of his book is a joke, because apparently his loyalty was to a corrupt Obama, Clintons, and their toadies. It certainly wasn’t to the people or to the country for which he was appointed to serve.

    Like

  41. Srateshooter says:

    If you want t get a feel of just how dirty LL is in all this just look at her congressional hearing on all this.She refused to answer a single question.COMPLETELY DIRTY! And this the AG?? Jeez!!!

    Like

    • Cheesehead54016 says:

      It would appear the tarmac meeting in Phoenix would be somewhat easy to prove as being set up ahead of time if that was the case. Flight schedules, pilot logs, flight plans, pilot interviews, etc would show whether or not that meeting was by chance or by design.

      Assuming IG would have done this by now????

      Like

  42. asdfsfd says:

    According to the theory, NYPD was willing ignore violent child sex offenders because of a threat to one of its officers by then AG LL? Let’s meditate for a moment on how ridiculous an idea that is.

    Like

  43. H&HC, 2nd-16th says:

    “Mondays Mondays – will never be the same!” If its not in a song by someone, it should be. (Mama’s and Pappa’s ?)

    AMERICA 1st

    Like

  44. kevin king says:

    Quote “In early 2016, the U.S. government became aware of information from a classified source, and “the source and content of that material remains classified as I write this,” according to the book. Had it become public, the unverified material would have been used by political opponents to cast serious doubt on the AT’s independence in connection with the Clinton Investigation.”

    I’m not convinced this is related to what was on Wiener’s laptop and Lynch’s interjection to get the investigation shut down. Comey is referencing a classified source from early 2016, almost a full year before the events relating to the WSJ leak. Furthermore he knows what it’s about. Even Comey would not suppress the kind of sordid evidence that was on Wiener’s laptop if it was that bad. I know he’s a lying cnt but he would be implicating himself here. Makes no sense that the two are connected

    Like

  45. Linus in W.PA. says:

    So someone has Weiner’s laptop……

    ……and let’s not ever forget that we may have been very, very close to having a Stank-Ho Hag like Hillary Clinton, and her wretched den of scum, in the Presidency.

    Like

  46. digleigh says:

    Today the court’s decide on ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AGAINST TRUMP… April 19 Abedin tapes release may be too late??Or is Trump waiting for them to DAMAGE him, so he can show damages?? Also, if I read the above correctly, …they practically squelched the NEW YORK investigations by threatening NYPD with coming down on the Garner case??WTHECK?! How corrupt was the intel under OBAMA , and continuing under Trump(NOT draining fast enough)?? I would like to believe Trump has some great thing up his sleeve, etc. Right now, if feels like he is on his heels, and our Elected officials are doing NOTHING to prevent his persecution(NO GONADS), because they are so petty, jealous, and dumb, they do not realize that with marxists and jihadists , they will all be NEXT!….. The opposition has not minded egging, knocking unconscious, rioting, vandalizing, “keeping Trump in court (Brock’s playbook), using biased media (65 met with Hillary campaign/Schmidt 100 million to Crowdstrike(to find so called Russian interference) his email with Cheryl Mills to get Hillary elected, Comey (husband/dad of 3 pu–yhat WOMEN;s MARCH ladies)on narcissist “I am more moral and have no gonads” book tour….., attacking Rand Paul, shooting up our legislators almost mortally wounding Scalise and shooting our Secret Service?????? What else are these deranged people capable… IMHO,Soros(Hillary’s number 2 funder) is buying SOS’s, D.A.s and judges, etc….WE BETTER FIGHT PEOPLE!THIS NATION IS AT STAKE!!

    Like

  47. hellinahandbasket says:

    Hate to say it.
    But it sure seems like a new-and-improved 911 is on its way.
    Can’t have the masses focused on these shenanigans too much longer.
    Stay safe everyone.

    Like

    • Firefly says:

      The left are putting their minions on alert in case Rosenstein and Mueller are fired. they have an alert process all set up.

      Like

  48. Bubby says:

    Does this evidence still exist or has it been destroyed like all of Hillary’s other emails, phones, hard drives or laptops?

    Like

  49. covfefe999 says:

    I went back to look at the Oct 30 2016 warrant (whatever the legal term is) which allowed further searches of Weiner’s laptop. http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/cases/show.php?db=special&id=532 An FBI agent was the applicant. When the NY FBI originally seized the laptop they were hunting for info related to his sex crime, but then they started to see all of the classified emails.

    Why isn’t Huma Abedin in prison? Obviously she was the reason Weiner ended up with the emails on his laptop. Either she was careless to use his laptop when reading emails, or she transferred them there (for safekeeping?), or he copied them without her knowledge. In any case she committed a crime. How do these people skate????

    Like

    • covfefe999 says:

      This excerpt from a news article is maddening: On Oct. 28, Comey sent Congress a letter advising lawmakers that new evidence had emerged in the Clinton probe and steps were being taken to review it. On Nov. 6, two days before the election, Comey sent a follow-up letter, saying the evidence had not changed the FBI’s conclusion announced in July that no prosecution of Clinton was warranted in the case. https://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/clinton-email-investigation-search-warrant-released-232852 The FBI had just gotten a warrant on Oct 30 to investigate the classified emails. They were finished by Nov 6?? There were thousands of emails!

      Like

      • covfefe999 says:

        WaPo article dated Oct 28 2016 which was a Friday. Clinton told reporters Friday night in Iowa that she learned of the newly discovered emails only after the letter to Congress was made public. “I’m confident whatever [the emails] are will not change the conclusion reached in July,” she said. “Therefore, it’s imperative that the bureau explain this issue in question, whatever it is, without any delay.”

        She was confident that nothing would happen because this fix was already in. Thousands of classified emails on Weiner’s laptop that she and stupid Huma Abedin allowed to be there, yet Hillary was confident it wouldn’t be a problem for her. Must be nice to be on the precipice of being charged with a federal crime but not worry at all.

        THANK GOD SHE LOST.

        Like

    • farrier105 says:

      They have to be protected until it is impossible to continue to cover for them. It is not just to protect THEM. The Masters have to recruit others like them in the future, so they can’t just willy-nilly toss them under buses. The operators can disappear, etc., but the prosecutions must be very rare if others are to be recruited down the road.

      Like

    • covfefe999 says:

      This archive of Huma Abedin-related articles on Judicial Watch is very interesting and very frustrating to read. https://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/tag/huma-abedin/ I am slowly making my way through it.

      It amazes me that the more I read the worse Clinton, Obama, Lynch, Abedin, and the other traitorous Dems appear. There is no info exonerating them, it all incriminates them. Why are they still walking free?

      Like

    • Mary Morse says:

      Eric Prince says in his interview (traceybeans video) that Huma and Weiner were cooperating.

      Like

  50. gary says:

    did you notice what was lacking in preet’s tweet? any denial of the pssibility of the story about lynch and the blackmail threat.

    Liked by 15 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s