Carter Page Interview With Laura Ingraham…

The primary target of the DOJ FISA “Title I” surveillance warrant, Carter Page, appears on Fox News with Laura Ingraham for an exclusive interview discussing Mr. Page’s history and contact with the Trump campaign. There are two interview segments.

Video #1:

.

Video #2 below:

♦Around 01:50 of segment #2 Carter Page says he emailed FBI Director James Comey on Sept. 25th, 2016 offering his help on any questions the FBI might have; and noted prior work with people within the FBI and the intelligence community.  This is approximately a month before the October 21st, 2016, FISA “Title 1” application against him.

♦Around 03:05 Mr. Page mentions the prior DOJ case he was involved in, against Evgeny Buryakov, described by the DOJ as an FBI Under-Cover Employee (UCE-1), in this interview Carter Page describes himself as a “witness“.

.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Deep State, Dem Hypocrisy, Dept Of Justice, FBI, media bias, propaganda, Russia, Spying, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

387 Responses to Carter Page Interview With Laura Ingraham…

  1. freddy says:

    He’s not just a mole he’s a naked mole rat. Ever seen a picture of one.. Very similar……

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Big Jake says:

    Did Laura let the guy talk?

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Jane Smith says:

    Actually, now that I think about it, I can guarantee that Carter Page is still working for the FBI.
    How?
    He has/had a Type 1 FISA Warrant out on him…meaning that the FBI called him a spy and yet, he hasn’t been charged with any crime, is free to travel anywhere and, can go on talk shows.
    While Paul Manafort, who was charged with much less, had his door kicked in, had his passport seized and, was put under house arrest.
    So, Carter Page was an FBI mole inserted in to the Trump Campaign…by McCain via Cox.

    Liked by 22 people

    • kriseton says:

      Yes, this is my belief, too. Especially with McCain’s ties to the dossier. I’m very surprised this wasn’t in the first memo, but my guess is they are holding on to that connection for a later time. Need to focus right now on Obama/Hillary, etc. Not drag Never Trumpers into this quite yet…

      Liked by 4 people

      • yy4u says:

        Kriseton — another guess. “Don’t speak ill of the dead”. John McCain most likely is dying of glioblastoma multiforme and my guess is nobody in the Repub party wants to smear him. Just as Barack Obama’s skin color was a coat of mail, so is John McCain’s diagnosis.

        Liked by 4 people

        • Plain Jane says:

          Strong PC covers.

          Liked by 2 people

          • wolfmoon1776 says:

            Cards, cards, cards. Vet card, POW card, diagnosis card. Pull ’em up close and use ’em like blankets! Songbird got plenty of them for picking the “winning” side in Vietnam / American campuses / ’70’s enemedia. Nixon went down to the enemy press, but not McCain.

            The entire ’70’s Fake News / Hollyweird complex was just as bad as today – we just had no idea how badly we had been infiltrated. Born on the Fourth of July! Deer Hunter! China Syndrome! Psycho-rehabilitating and denuclearizing propaganda, shown to us in our free-range Red Dawn prison camp of Cultural Marxist America. At the end of the road – Uranium One.

            McCain! Hero!

            Think about that one.

            Liked by 10 people

        • gda says:

          He’s lingering too damn long IMO.

          Liked by 1 person

        • Curious to know how “ill” McCain really is…has anyone actually seen photos of him since last November? He is supposedly tweeting away against Trump but I can’t figure out if he’s comatose and his aides/family are covering it or if he doesn’t actually have glioblastoma but is milking it for political cover while he hides out in Arizona and plots with his Deep State buddies. (Remember the boot on the wrong foot? That has always bothered me….)

          Liked by 15 people

          • Alligator Gar says:

            Yep. Like Ginsburg’s “pancreatic cancer” that she’s had for years…none of these upper-class idjits ever die of these things. If you or I had them, we’d be dead in 6 months. Tops.

            Liked by 2 people

            • kriseton says:

              Is same cancer as Ted Kennedy was diagnosed with. He was dead in about a year or so. Not a good diagnosis. No ‘special’ treatment that only the rich or connected can get. Death sentence. Treatment is just really buying you time. I think he won’t last the rest of the year. Feel badly for him as a person, but maybe after he is gone, the truth will come out and people will feel free to speak.

              Liked by 1 person

              • humangem says:

                My late mother had GBM. Her tumor was one of the smallest that has ever been diagnosed. The pathology of these tumors are that they are usually relatively large when found. My mother lasted 13 months and she was healthy as a horse before and only 67. McCain, with his age, the location of his tumor, will be fortunate to even last a year. His is in an area that would affect thinking. (Whereas my mother’s was near her motor strip and left her with paralysis. Still, even with her, at some point, it began to affect her thinking.)

                What we all should be doing, especially if you are Christian, is praying that McCain comes to accept Jesus and repent of his sins. His life’s actions clearly show a disconnect between him and God. Eternity is a long time. We should not wish on anyone eternal separation from God.

                Liked by 2 people

            • hanna693 says:

              Or 1-1/2 months like my Mom. It did get Steve Jobs though, but he’s not a politician.

              Liked by 1 person

        • zimbalistjunior says:

          at some point we may say, ‘he’s been dying of the same heart attack for 20 years’ a la Hyman Roth.

          Liked by 1 person

        • Summer says:

          Yeah, he is dying so badly that he crafted a “McCain immigration bill” on his deathbed, which includes amnesty and excludes all other Trump’s “pillars.”

          McStain will not relinquish his grip on power and will try his best to obstruct MAGA as long as his pulse can be felt (or claimed to be felt) or perhaps even afterwards if he happened to write some fake memoirs. And no, I don’t feel bad for being unsympathetic.

          Liked by 3 people

          • dayallaxeded says:

            Canary McStain probably can’t string three coherent words together–lobbyists wrote the bill, probably under direction of Tom Donohue. SD has made it clear to us for a long time and you can see it in the bills that get submitted, they’re not written by congress-critters. They’re written by lobbyists or staffers planted by special interests. Canary McStain could already be dead and deep stinkers’d keep trotting him out with some strong guys to hold him up and wiggle him around to make it look like he’s alive.

            Liked by 3 people

          • Bulldog84 says:

            Senators don’t write bills; lobbyists do. No reason McCain can’t sign his name on something while he’s undergoing treatment.

            Liked by 1 person

    • fanbeav says:

      I think you are right! His interview last night with Laura Ingraham was very odd! Smiling the whole time while you are being called a spy? Someone needs to waterboard him!

      Like

    • pluffmudgirl says:

      Yes…like the Sherlock Holmes story about the dog that didn’t bark in the night.

      “Sherlock Homes solves the mystery in part by recognizing that no one he spoke to in his investigation remarked that they had heard barking from the watchdog during the night.

      Gregory (Scotland Yard detective): “Is there any other point to which you would wish to draw my attention?”

      Holmes: “To the curious incident of the dog in the night-time.”

      Gregory: “The dog did nothing in the night-time.”

      Holmes: “That was the curious incident.””

      The FBI didn’t perform a pre-dawn home invasion by the FBI as they did for Manafort.

      Liked by 1 person

    • brenrod says:

      I agree… page appears non plussed..playing the same role he was playing all along

      Like

  4. Lurker2 says:

    She should have read Page’s testimony and asked some of the questions from it.

    Like

    • Lurker2 says:

      Or how about this one: “Why why why did you hook up with the Trump campaign if you’d already been involved with the FBI as a surveillance target and/or witness?”

      Liked by 8 people

      • wolfmoon1776 says:

        This is an excellent question. And it’s one of the reasons I’m suspicious, because I DIDN’T hook up TOO MUCH for a very similar reason (although I’m not sure who, exactly, was behind my surveillance, which dates back to the CLINTON administration or even earlier!).

        One of the reasons I was very reluctant to volunteer for the Trump campaign beyond the lowest levels (yard signs and phone calls) was because I knew that the Deep State had been collecting on me for years, and had WORKED very hard to CREATE incriminators like having their informants BEGGING me to use racial slurs, etc. Other stuff way worse, but I’m sitting on those nukes. I was assuming they would just use that stuff to TAINT Trump if I got too involved. But NOW I realize the ABUSERS of intelligence could have used some status to cast surveillance on Trump.

        NOW – here is a doozy. When I was doing Trump phone work, I got routed some calls that were CLEARLY psy-ops of some kind. No details, but they were obviously targeted to ME personally. They were freaky and seemed very professional. They were also dual-purposed to GET DIRT in prior ways that Deep State had been looking. THAT means that Deep State was ALL OVER the Trump campaign – even sneaking into the phone calls for GOTV. I could not say anything about that until now that we have the rats cornered, but there was some very weird stuff going on there.

        The badness of surveillance and sabotage against Trump will not stop with Carter Page.

        Liked by 8 people

        • Doppler says:

          Just because you’re paranoid, Wolfmoon, doesn’t mean the deep state (and Google/Facebook/Amazon) isn’t in fact following your every move. Did you get a notice from the IRS 3 or 4 years ago that someone had filed a return with your SSN, and have to file an affidavit of identity theft?

          Liked by 2 people

        • old45model says:

          Could he (CP) have been ‘turned’ – and then ‘turned’ again? And possibly again? Or have his ‘handlers’ been turned as well?
          As for McCain, why would he not have been brainwashed during his time at the “Hanoi Hilton”? His handler/s would only have to use the key words or phrases to have him start sprouting again. He could well have been to a ‘refresher’ any number of times in the past, where new ‘implants’ were installed.
          It is intriguing when ‘coincidental coincidences’ keep popping their little heads above the parapet, WM1776. Having had a private telephone conversation repeated to me word for word the morning after it occurred, by a person who was not part of that conversation, lead me to believe my phone was tapped. Or, when a particular vehicle follows me for 600 kilometres (and panics when I shake them for a while) leads me to believe I am being followed. Slow down, speed up, pull over suddenly, sit and wait – plenty of opportunities to pass me…
          No, I’m not paranoid – but I am really observant. I used to track down people as part of my job.

          Liked by 3 people

          • wolfmoon1776 says:

            Oh, you got me started! KABOOM

            You’re not imagining things. The abuse of intelligence in this country has been far more rampant, and far more political, than most people realize. And what we’re going to learn is going to be much worse than what we know so far.

            How people were chosen as victims for IC abuse is likely to be interesting. In a lot of ways, it was RANDOM. If you donated money to a Tea Party organization that was harassed by the IRS under Obama, you were on a list of people for “more bad stuff”.
            During the Clinton years, if you were a donor to any gun rights organizations they didn’t like, you were on their list for “more bad stuff”. And they will have DONE bad stuff.

            About McCain…

            People need to be VERY realistic about McCain. He was an incredibly high-value target. With my current understanding of world-wide communism at that time, it’s very clear how they handled McCain. They studied him. This isn’t magic – it’s science. They then TRAINED HIM without him knowing it. He has VERY predictable behaviors. They enhanced and rewarded those behaviors, which we now see.

            McCain was trained to respond to opposition in defined, predictable ways.

            That’s all. That’s all they did. But it works like crazy.

            And then they set him free, and he left. They sent him home. Into an America with a very strong hidden socialist presence that was 100% ready to use him.

            An aside.

            The Soviets were practicing 4GW against America in the 1960’s and 1970’s at levels that have not been seen since. We fought with guns and a thoroughly compromised CIA in a wishy-washy Vietnam. THEY fought us AT HOME using our own newsrooms and universities, and a Democrat party already dying under Marxist domination. And THEY WON.

            If we do NOT view the Vietnam War in 4GW terms, taking place on a hidden front IN AMERICA, we will never truly understand what happened and WHY.

            My view of the Vietnam War is distasteful to everybody. It is a bitter lesson in how BIG C Communism WINS. But if people don’t accept these truths, and the new rules of understanding the reality of the 1960’s and 1970’s, they will never KEEP the freedoms we have regained in this second American Revolution which we are now fighting in 4GW space.

            Think about it. I DARE people to see Vietnam with clear eyes, seeing how it was fought IN AMERICA.

            Back to McCain. Poor bastard.

            You can PREDICT how McCain will act. And he acts that way all the time. The Dems KNOW how to manipulate him, and they do. It’s totally face-palm to us, but it works, and McCain can do nothing about it.

            When Obama and McCain were presented to us, it was a TOTALLY rigged election. We may have actually done better by choosing Obama, because SO MUCH was exposed by their overreach.

            America NEEDS the BITCHSLAP IDIOCY of “pussy-hatted” women in the streets of Washington to realize just how badly the other side has compromised things. But their kingdom of lies and Marxist conspiracy is crumbling, and we’re not going to stop until it’s GROUND INTO DUST and swept into the dustbin of history. STERILIZED BY SUNLIGHT.

            There will be no shutting up about communism EVER AGAIN. THAT is how it festered beyond belief. If the FAKE media doesn’t like it, they can GO TO HELL.

            THEY ARE GUILTY.

            GUILTY! GUILTY! GUILTY!

            Liked by 1 person

            • wolfmoon1776 says:

              See this image through new eyes. Eyes that see “Watergate” as the perfect “Muh Russia”, which TEMPTED Nixon to make all the wrong moves. And he did. And they WON.

              Hillary and her communist buddies WON Watergate. But they will LOSE “Russiagate”, and be exposed for BOTH CRIMES.

              Liked by 1 person

  5. phoenixRising says:

    Liked by 4 people

    • AmericaFirst says:

      This sounds like he was just asking the same thing President Trump was, come on now, clear my name.

      Like

    • brenrod says:

      they werent targeting page they were providing cover for the mole operation… did FISC know he was an fbi mole… did FISC take part in the operation… did FISC help provide the cover …. was FISC corrupted… I bet they dont release the transcripts… perhaps the surveillance is still ongoing.

      Liked by 1 person

      • woodstuff says:

        Everyone knows mucho surveillance occurred that never went through any court or governmental agency. I keep wondering why so much surveillance would be recorded and placed into a “compartment” that could be discovered. The Lucifer-led shadow government/deep state would have known better, one would have thought. Did our Creator cause them to be blind to the obvious?

        Like

  6. Vince says:

    Is Carter the subject of any other FISA request during his time at the FBI? Is there a pattern of the FBI using him as a walking micrphone?

    Liked by 3 people

  7. billrla says:

    We are not going to get to the bottom of this Page guy until he appears on “Ellen.” That’s where all the straight-shooters and white-hats go to tell their story, directly to the American People.

    Liked by 5 people

  8. Was McCain the footnote on the FSIA warrant admitting a political tie instead of the Hillary connection?

    Like

    • Mark McQueen says:

      At the very least, McCain along with Comey’s “official briefing” to O and Trump provided the “air of legitimacy” to the Clinton dossier so the MSM could publish it.

      Like

    • deqwik2 says:

      That would make sense. The reason they gave McCain the dossier to give to the FBI was so that it could come from a credible source. (The FBI already had a copy before McCain provided them with his copy).

      Like

  9. Don man says:

    Carter Page worked for the FBI and was CI and undercover, etc. He helped nab and get Russian agents prosecuted and continued to travel to Moscow as an agent CI for FBI to gather more intel for our country, he probably fooled all the russians and spies playing off as somebody who had info on US energy and such, so he cannot admit on live TV he was an FBI CI and working with them even until this day, why???? Because the RUSSiANS will KILL HIM!! He will be hunted and finally assassinated by PUTIN if confirmed he was CI for all these years. That is why he is not being indicted or arrested here for dealing with Russian, because he worked for FBI trying to get intel on their dealings. But FBI turned around and used his status, called him a spy and got FISA warrant to wiretap and follow Trump. FBI used him to get into Trump campaign then smeared him as a spy, justifying FISA warrants.

    I feel bad for him because the Russians are going to catch up and kill him!! And no FBI protection will get his back, he is a DEAD MAN WALKING!!!

    Like

    • dayallaxeded says:

      I suspect you’re buying into a much more heinous caricature or RUS than is real–sure, they deal very harshly with their own dissidents (some of whom could justifiably be called “traitors” by establishment RUS, despite our value judgments of them; e.g., Alexander Litvinenko), but where’s the evidence that they would murder some third-rate USA “spy,” hiding in plain sight and involved only with oil/gas/energy policy and business? The stuff CPage seems to have been involved in is almost certainly an ongoing speed-chess game between all the oil/energy players in the world, private and governmental, where the loss of a pawn or even a bishop isn’t necessarily a big deal–may even be strategic. Keeping a known piece on the board is better than having him disappear to be replaced by a phantom with unknown powers.

      Like

    • dayallaxeded says:

      Thinking more about it, that kind of cold-blooded retribution seems more in line with the Klintoon Krime Kartel than muh rooskies.

      Liked by 2 people

    • wondering999 says:

      Your comment is reminding me that in the last year or so of the Obama administration, a tremendous number of Russians were murdered. There was a plane shot down over Egypt, and a slew of others single murders

      One victim was the Russian ambassador to Turkey, Andrew Karlov
      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4057828/Russia-lays-rest-murdered-Turkey-envoy-honours.html

      “….a former head of Turkish military intelligence has said Western secret services could have been behind the assassination.

      The extraordinary claim came from Ismail Hakki Pekin, who ‘hinted that foreign intelligence services may have been somehow connected to the Russian official’s death’, said Kremlin-owned Sputnik news agency after interviewing the former Turkish military intelligence chief”

      Like

      • wondering999 says:

        This Daily Mail article about the death of Sergei Krivov claims that “Krivov is the seventh Russian official to die mysteriously since November”

        “Sergei Krivov, a 63-year-old security officer, was found dead on the morning of Election Day – November 8 – at the Russian Consulate in New York….Initially, the New York Police Department ruled that the death was caused by a head wound, according to BuzzFeed….But the city’s medical examiner now says that Krivov died of internal bleeding related to a tumor…A US intelligence official told BuzzFeed that the FBI failed to find anything suspicious in Krivov’s death”

        http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4275666/Examiner-contradicts-NYPD-probe-dead-Russia-diplomat.html

        Like

  10. John Rawls says:

    So Page is provides evidence to help convict Russian operative,
    and then goes to Russia and speaks at the Moscow World Trade Center.

    This doesn’t make much sense. Why would Russians be cool with that?

    Liked by 1 person

  11. John Rawls says:

    Here, Carter Page says he had meeting with Rosneft Executive

    @27:50

    Like

  12. phoenixRising says:

    Like

  13. ecmarsh says:

    This is what I know sofar.
    Christopher Steele is a former MI6 spy.
    Carter Page is a former FBI spy.

    Like

  14. Esperanza says:

    I’m thinking back to before the election. Remember when we were talking about the tinfoil hat election? Even six months ago I would not have believed the FBI to be in a plot to remove the elected president of the US. It just gets wackier.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Summer says:

      I believe it is much worse than “just” FISA abuses. I believe the insurance policy included the final solution to the Trump problem. That’s what secret societies are for.

      Like

      • Remember when Old Man Bush made that slit throat gesture regarding Trump….

        Like

        • dayallaxeded says:

          Too bad he wasn’t holding a straight razor in his hand when he made that gesture. Lordy, I’ve come to detest Booshies. I used to think Shrub got a raw deal from media and Demonrats generally (he did, but he should’ve gotten worse, right along with the Demonrats and enemedia), but not anymore and Poopy, esp’ly, couldn’t get a deal raw enough!

          Liked by 1 person

  15. Melanie says:

    Oh what a tangled web “They” have woven. I’m very disappointed!
    These criminals are walking free only to Plot more destruction.

    Like

  16. Smudge says:

    Said he met Russian diplomat only two times. Does that help prove or disprove he was UCE1 who handed over bugged binders? Or was it the other two guys who got the binders? I is confused…

    Like

  17. phoenixRising says:

    Do you believe the unmitigated gall?????

    Liked by 1 person

    • phoenixRising says:

      Like

      • EJ says:

        “Current oversight may lead to future lack of oversight.” Do these idiots commonsense proof their own posts?

        Liked by 2 people

      • Lurker2 says:

        The rise of Axios bothers me. Didn’t we have enough fake news outlets? Was it necessary to add another?

        Like

      • ChrisL says:

        Axios is a new “Washington Establishment” Deep State pub largely created for disinformation purposes I suspect. The co-publsihers are both from Politico and one of them was formerly with the Washington Post. And, btw, the founders of Politico have some interesting history with the Intelligence Agencies and were involved in a money laundering operation way back the way.

        Liked by 1 person

      • dayallaxeded says:

        That’s fine–congress can cut the intel agencies out of the budget. If they want to work for free and pay for their own black helicopters, well, that’ll probably weed out those who aren’t seriously committed to the USA, anyway.

        Like

      • brenrod says:

        whereas merciless prosecution of each and every deep state crook will encourage them to keep congress in the loop.

        Like

  18. davecatbone says:

    @The_War_Economy posted that “This is the first time I have learnt this about Carter Page. Why isn’t it mentioned? He worked with the Clinton Administration transition team between 1992 and 1993.”
    Whaaaaaaaaaat?

    Liked by 2 people

  19. I think that Page is private sector, and is like many other private sector individuals who are asked to help with foreign contacts. He reminds me of certain bright acquaintances who are can function successfully enough in the private sector but are way too quirky to be GS-umpteen. He would be unhappy in that drab and pedestrian role.

    He was left out to dry, rather than being shielded like Papadopoulos from adversarial investigations. Those two are unalike, imo, in competency, personalities, and backgrounds.

    Like

  20. Lurker2 says:

    Great credentials but hasn’t had a job for like 2 years and is representing himself for testimony and in his court cases. And despite being jobless and apparently unable to afford legal counsel he pursued a volunteer position in the Trump campaign rather than look for a paying job. VERY ODD.

    Liked by 1 person

  21. Sentient says:

    Liked by 1 person

  22. Joshua says:

    Sorry if already mentioned, but is it possible that CARTER PAGE is exactly who DR. EVELYN FARKAS was referring to as “sources and methods” in her March 27, 2017 MSNBC interview?

    When she said (testing html here – fingers crossed),

    Because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior [Obama] people who left; so it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy, um, that the Trump folks – if they found out HOW we knew what we knew about their, the Trump staff, dealing with Russians – that they would try to compromise those sources and methods; meaning we no longer have access to that intelligence.

    is she directly referring to the reoccurring Title 1 FISA warrant on Mr. Page ?

    If so,

    – Who specificaly is the “we” she refers to “having access to that intelligence”? It must be more than the few DOJ/FBI people who have ‘left’. They must have still been in govt doing this under the nose of their new boss when she gave the interview. I ask this because if, in part, this intel was previously accessed through the PDB or some circulated document this would obviously no longer be the case. I guess the theory is that they were using the circulated unmasked intel under Obama to amass a list of names for the underlings to continue surveillance of using the Page warrant after he left. Is there a paper trail of what FBI/DOJ activity was conducted under the auspices of the Page warrant?

    – Since we know they weren’t really interested in Page himself, how many degrees of separation from Page were being spied upon, and likely unmasked for “them” to see? How was this warrant being used AFTER inauguration? Who, not in the administration, was it being used on (besides Trump Jr.)? Or, are we to believe they were rifling through past communications of the campaign/transition team ONLY up until the inauguration? If so, why renew the warrant for almost a year after?

    – Is it totally crazy to wonder if members of a Sitting Administration were being ‘monitored’? I think it is crazy, but what ‘intel’ could she then be worried about ‘losing access to’? Trump Jr.’s emails? no way.

    [PS]: ok, I just found a reply by svenwg to another comment while typing – looks like this Farkas identification was already suggested – good:
    https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/02/05/in-march-2016-carter-page-was-an-fbi-employee-in-october-2016-fbi-told-fisa-court-hes-a-spy/comment-page-6/#comment-4974794

    On another note, I have to repeat the question everyone is asking because I want to believe someone (MUELLER?) should answer this: How on this green earth is Page the only ‘person of interest’ not indicted and also the only one who had a Title 1 FISA warrant renewed 3 times !? This seems insane. It seems there should be rules in place to prevent such apparent abuse. If they say “well he was an FBI asset” then how can they justify filing and renewing the warrant and NOT informing the Trump Campaign/Administration. We suspect we know the answer to this… but who will ask these questions?

    Is it possible the transition team did know about the warrant on Page and just hasn’t said so? It would be interesting to know when Trump himself was first made aware of this warrant; especially in relation to the timing of the Comey firing.

    Apologies for this long rambling comment. woke up to pee last night and farkas popped into my head and been there since. those eyes, jeez.

    Like

    • Rob Byrde says:

      It is all history now in 2016 and 2017. Trump won in spite of all the cheating!!!! It still is amazing.

      Liked by 2 people

    • dayallaxeded says:

      I’ve been thinking since Farkas’ first f’d up interview with Minki that she should be water-boarded to give up specifics that she vaguely alluded to. She had too much detail and spilled too many beans to just be allowed to trot off into enemedia. That an airhead like that was given such outrageous, broad and deep access to classified, indeed, classified, super-secret, criminal conspiracy information only further shows what idiot criminals were running the show under 0bunghole. Lord knows how much more criminality and damage to the USA and her citizens was done by those idiots!

      Like

  23. gda says:

    Apologies if this has been covered. Sometimes the firehose overwhelms me.

    Is it correct that Steele left MI6 in 2009 at age 45? If so, why would a “highly reputable” MI6 big-up leave his post in the middle of his promising (?) career?

    Just what WERE the true circumstances of his parting company with MI6? Has anyone reported on this?

    Like

  24. Faye says:

    Perhaps Russia didn’t want Donald Trump to win and worked with Hillary to stop him.

    Like

  25. Chewbarkah says:

    Wouldn’t any Russian business person, spy, and/or government official with an IQ about room temperature ASSUME someone like Carter Page was a US intel operator, trying to attract agents? Wouldn’t Page have enough sense to know he would be either perceived this way and shunned, or Russian intel would try to recruit him? What did Carter Page think he had going that would motivate Russian Oil & Gas magnates to hire him, or cut him in on deals? The appearance is that he brought zip to their table except risk.

    In view of the above, doesn’t it seem likely that Page was intel bait in a rather obvious game? It would be a very short step from FBI/CIA using him this way, to using him as bait against members of the Trump camp. If Congressional investigators don’t already know Page’s whole story, they had better get after it.

    Like

  26. Heika says:

    When you completely change the fundamental premise of this whole Carter Page game as Sundance has done by proposing he could, in fact, be a deliberate plant by the FBI – it takes a minute for your mind to catch up. Then you see this interview in a very different light. His body language and ‘acting’ smacks of insincerity. He is smarmy. We now know he is ‘lying’ around the idea of ‘witness’ or ‘contractor’ for the FBI.

    Running the whole game again with the changed base premise – to one where he was sent into the Trump campaign deliberately (by the corrupt FBI and probably the mastermind behind all of this John Brennan) to ‘set up’ a ‘reason’ by the FBI to spy on ‘him’ – Carter Page’ … wow… it starts to clarify. How clever. That was Page’s job, to be the guy. That he didn’t stay long, only long enough to ‘get the job started’ (the FISA warrant going) kind of makes sense. He was an empty vessel and had done his job. When you think about it… its the ultimate in ‘controlled set up’ with a knowing and paid patsy. He was always their man, and his ties in Russia (as he was always spying on them) were the perfect lead in. Makes more sense than ever.

    One would expect he should now be ‘bumped’ so he does not tell, but that would not do, as they need him to complete his contract.. which is to come onto conservative shows like pushover Laura’s (note its not Hannity or Tucker) and plead his innocence and victimhood. He does not seem very upset does he? His body language has him ‘on script’….still. He cant be knocked off unless it gets too hot, but right now they need him. The trouble is, I think the unintended consequences may have been that he is now being touted as the innocent victim?? The crooks are well and truly now in damage control so I would say Carter Page will be ‘tooled’ in some way to try to get them out of bother.

    Like

  27. Rob Byrde says:

    I get it….don’t even THINK about whispering ‘r-u-s-s-i-a’…least the USA intelligence community call you a SPY!

    Like

  28. asdf says:

    Anyone else think the 2013 incident sounds like dufuses larping as russian spies? I wonder if the fbi didn’t just want a pelt on the wall. I continue to believe Page is a nobody and that they only put him in the dossier because it was an easy fit and only FISAd him to leak it to the press in continuation of ‘russiagate’ psyop

    Like

  29. I don’t buy that Page is some super spy that intentionally tainted the Trump campaign.
    Listening to older interviews he is exposing the FISA charade for quiet some time.. just in his stupid way of smiling and talking around.
    Here is his letter to Comey…

    Liked by 1 person

  30. WeThePeople2016 says:

    I really didn’t learn much from the Page interview last night. He and Laura were all over the place. It was a hodgepodge of topics that had no tangible theme, IMHO. He is also a bit strange.

    Like

  31. Missing Andrew says:

    Lionel Nation meet ConservativeTreeHouse

    Like

    • Ziiggii says:

      he makes a good point that I was trying to make earlier today…

      Page doesn’t act like someone who just found out they were under a Title 1 FISA warrant

      Like

      • Bulldog84 says:

        He didn’t just find out he was allegedly under investigation. He’s known for at least months, even if he didn’t know about a specific warrant. He also likely knows by now the the so-called investigation of him was a ruse to spy on someone else.

        Like

    • Missing Andrew says:

      Lionel says:

      The Carter Page story stinks to high heaven. Did you see him with Laura Ingraham? Does this look like the victim of a FISA Title I surveillance foreign agent and spy? In 2013 Carter Page was working as an “under-cover employee” (UCE) of the FBI, helping them to build a case against “Evgeny Buryakov,” the Conservative Treehouse notes. In March 2016 Carter Page remained their informant pre-trial leading to a pleading of guilty from Buryakov. Then he transitions into a super duper Russian spy? What?! I think we know what happened. But don’t expect anyone in the MSM news to even scratch the surface.

      Liked by 1 person

  32. Ziiggii says:

    Like

  33. NYGuy54 says:

    I found this to be very disturbing

    Like

  34. Ziiggii says:

    Like

  35. Gary says:

    Consider adding these dates to the BIG UGLY TIME LINE,
    as they relate to the global views of Soros:

    June 2016 England votes to exit EU

    Aug 2016 Nigel Farage; Trump rally in Jackson, Miss.

    Like

  36. CM-TX says:

    He so casually refers to the House Intel Committee as: “Hip-See” [HPSCI]. 🤔

    Liked by 1 person

  37. texasjimbrock says:

    I have a further interest: The “insurance policy” discussed in McCabe’s office. My mind wanders at times but is this plausible? Comey will come up with a memo of a supposed meeting with Trump, which will then be passed on to a confederate for “leaking” to the NYT. A hullabaloo will erupt, leading to the appointment of a special counsel who will then occupy the administration’s time for a couple of years, and then claim something…obstruction of justice?…unrelated to the supposed underpinning of the original appointment. And if the Democrats regain control of the House an impeachment will follow.
    The whole thing rides on Comey’s memo.
    Do we believe Comey?
    JimB

    Like

    • If someone with a set would charge Comey tomorrow for giving his memos (CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS) to the press it would be a slam dunk case and ruin Comey’s credibility as a witness in any future litigation.

      Like

    • D. Manny says:

      That explains why the DNC wants to string out this Mueller investigation without ever resolving it….they’re buying time.

      Like

  38. x7f7x says:

    The Page letter to Comey is contrived to reflect a victim narrative. FISA Title 1 warrant would mean he has been practically (supposedly) vetted as an agent of a foreign state to the Nth degree, yet he is not sitting in GITMO? Interviewed by the Feds without a lawyer, multiple times, and has not received at least a process crime…him? Really? And he is/was prime suspect number 1 by the warrant? Does it add up? Think he is sharper than Flynn? Not by his House testimony transcripts. Mole.

    Like

  39. OpenMind says:

    I noticed in Simpson’s testimony that he uses the words hostile foregin power to describe contacts with Russia. Now why would a journalist just happen to use that combination of words? Is it any surprise that those same words permeate the the FISA statute. Simpson seems to boast about spending alot of time around attorneys, while not being one himself. in my experience, intelligent non-attorneys often repeat the verbiage they hear attorneys use without even realizing it. Could it be that he began using that language when tasked with helping an enormous, multimilion dollar legal team, orchestrate the Steele submissions in furtherance of the Title I surveillance scheme?
    I couldn’t help chuckling at a mainstram reported talking about “fruit from the poisoned tree” over the weekend.

    Liked by 1 person

  40. Kent says:

    Carter seems amused to me…maybe a bit starstruck….the brilliance of his handlers?

    I have to admit….it was pretty brilliant putting the perps in charge of investigating their own crimes…by the victim.

    That singular moment the realization of the setup dawns on them will be priceless…it will be as an epiphany which will strike their faces to stone and still their hearts for a beat….that their own web was turned inside out and that they are now inextricably ensnared in it…..

    Priceless………………………………

    Liked by 1 person

  41. IMO says:

    “Published on Feb 6, 2018Thomas describes the convoluted spy operation that James Comey had going at the FBI. It wasn’t just Carter Page…..and he wasn’t just a Russian spy.”

    Another top notch you tube audio by AIM.

    Like

  42. D. Manny says:

    So Page went undercover to out Russian spies in 2013, right?

    What if he actually thinks Trump is really a Russian spy?

    Like

  43. D. Manny says:

    2016-08-25 John Brennan informs Harry Reid about possible Russian collusion
    2016-08-27 Harry Reid sends a letter to James Comey referencing allegations made about Carter Page in the dossier
    http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/14/strzoks-texts-and-the-clinton-trump-investigations-a-definitive-timeline/
    ———————————-
    Isn’t it interesting that they leave Papadopoulos out of their letter?

    Like

  44. D. Manny says:

    Remember, all the lawyers have said that it’s impossible to get the Carter Page warrant without irrefutable proof….

    You know, the kind that they would have gathered from their past undercover stings with Carter playing a Russian…..

    Like

  45. LibertyONE says:

    Knowing how corrupt & devious those involved in the FISA application on Page…RIDDLE me this…Page was TOLD by the Bureau and or the DOJ that they were going to surveil/tap etc him as a means to gain access to their MAIN target DONALD TRUMO. He knows NO charges are going to be made aagaist him ( basically still a UCE-1). Think about it OVER a year “investigation” on Page and NO charges! Then Page elists into the Trump campaign to furrter the investigation. Nothing is beyond the pale with these POS..

    Like

  46. gymcy81 says:

    imho,
    that interview was not very fluid or organized.
    That interview jumped back and forth on time lines.

    I got the jist of it – but it is not about me – but did the interview need to have so many interruptions, unfinished answers and jumps to the next question along some other (often unsaid) point in the timeline?
    Due to the interview, a person could get an incorrect impression of the facts.

    p.s.
    perhaps the questions should have been prioritized, organized and flowed better for interview time assigned, and for the listeners to be able to better interpret the results.

    No one is perfect, I get it. Again, it is not about me.
    But, “we” can work to improve and to become better-versions-of-ourselves (so as to better help others) and serve Him and Her.

    imho

    Like

  47. covfefe999 says:

    Sorry if this was already answered somewhere …. does anyone know who leaked that “Male-1” in the Podobmyy charging document was Carter Page? Would it necessarily be someone from the FBI? https://www.buzzfeed.com/alimwatkins/a-former-trump-adviser-met-with-a-russian-spy https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3534774-PodobnyyComplaint-2.html#document/p1 The BuzzFeed article is so absurd where it says Trump “touted” Carter Page. BuzzFeed provided a link to a transcript of Trump speaking to the WaPo editorical board. Guess how Trump described Carter Page? As “Carter Page. PhD”. That’s it. No other words about Page. This constitutes “touted”? Just mentioning someone’s name?

    Liked by 1 person

    • covfefe999 says:

      In the charging document two of the Russians talk about ETFs destabilizing the markets. I have been blaming the roller coaster stock market of late on computer programs doing high speed/high frequency trading, and I heard someone on FOX Business this morning saying the same thing. How hard would it be for hostile trading companies to cause the market to roller coaster through trading? Or for hackers to cause the trading programs to malfunction?

      Like

  48. Missing Andrew says:

    Body Language: Carter Page

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s