President Trump Tweets Critique and Cover for British Prime Minister Theresa May…

Earlier today President Trump re-tweeted some videos showing radical Islamism and behavior of their terroristic followers.  The videos originated from a twitter account of a U.K. citizen.  Prime Minister Theresa May took exception to the sunlight:

“It is wrong for the President to have done this,” May’s office said in response to the retweeted videos, initially posted by British far-right leader Jayda Fransen of Britain First.

“Britain First seeks to divide communities through their use of hateful narratives which peddle lies and stoke tensions,” May said in a statement. “They cause anxiety to law-abiding people.” (read more)

Moments ago, President Trump responded (again, via Twitter):

The hidden part of this back-and-forth is the strategic two-layer cover this is providing PM Theresa May.    Here’s what media won’t point out:

#1) Prime Minister May’s government is currently in a furnace within the U.K. over the ongoing Brexit issues.   A criticism from Trump ends up bolstering her support as tenuous allies will now rally to her PC defense.

#2) Prime Minister May’s public defense of European political correctness, well received by the far-left within Britain, when contrast against the internal Islamic threat – will also allow her to take more aggressive action against the local Islamists.

No-one in the U.K. wants an attack where horrible POTUS Trump can say: “Toldyaso” etc.

Brilliant…. and horrible.

Oh, the vulgarian…


Domestic Approval Ratings:

This entry was posted in Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Brexit, Cultural Marxism, Death Threats, Donald Trump, European Union, ISIS, Islam, Jihad, media bias, President Trump, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Terrorist Attacks, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

283 Responses to President Trump Tweets Critique and Cover for British Prime Minister Theresa May…

  1. Donna in Oregon says:

    This isn’t the first time Europeans have gone nuts about Christians. Protestant vs Catholic. Now Secularist/Islamist vs Christian. Not going to end well for the Christians.

    What is very scary is the treasonous importation of murderers into Great Britain by their own politicians.

    They live on islands…..where are they going to go to get away? If we are going to make changes to immigration, I hope we put Christians from Great Britain first on the list.

    Liked by 7 people

  2. sunnydaze says:

    At the very least, it provides her some cover for Brexit. Assuming she actually wants Brexit.


  3. Matthew LeBlanc says:

    I was watching some British doc about mysteries. They got to angels and hyped up that both Judaism and Islam mentioned angels in their holy texts. Curiously the New Testament and the place angels play in the Gospel weren’t mentioned.

    An empire that at one time the sun never set on is lost. They will be losing their heads (literally) before they wake up to what they did.

    Liked by 2 people

  4. Sedanka says:

    Here we go again with everybody playing 27-D chess. Can’t anyone ever be a genuinely bad person, or just a plain old idiot, that Trump has to deal with? Sessions is a master strategist, May is a master persuader, everyone is a genius who’s secretly working in unison with Trump.

    No, Trump is the sole genius – and he’s surrounded on all sides by swamp creatures who describe themselves as Democrats, Republicans, Tories and every other label. May is terrible!

    Liked by 6 people

    • KittyKat says:

      Deplorables versus Horribles

      Liked by 2 people

    • Ditch Mitch says:

      Sedanka, I don’t think anyone here thinks this is a 44D chess move. I think PDJT did what any leader should do, tell the people the truth even if the media and politicians do not.

      As for May, she is not a strong leader and is controlled by the left/globalists. May does not like PDJT. He is a threat to her weak controlled (lack of) leadership. PDJT’s move was to call her out. May’s response was the canned divisive hate speech talking points of those same left/globalists.

      At least the information is out there now.

      Liked by 3 people

    • shallbe4 says:

      I would put it a little differently — One is always a genius when they are playing both ends against the middle.


  5. Rudy Bowen says:

    I have been thinking along those lines for a while now (since personal encounters with Turkish Marines and an Iranian exchange student, both another story). We are essentially engaged in an existential struggle that we can only have a chance to win if enough people in the West wake up in time. We are losing, and no matter what DJT accomplishes it will not matter unless and until people awaken to the threat to our way of life, and yes maybe the human race entirely, that islam represents. Anti woman, anti humanity, anti life sums up islam 100%. I include all leftist apologists for islam in all it’s forms in the ranks of the Enemy, too.

    Liked by 6 people

  6. Timmy-the-Ute says:

    The sad thing is President Trump has yet to be invited to England and the major of London would probably try to arrest Trump if he entered his city. I would like to see President Trump go to England to personally appeal the release Jayda if she was imprisoned.

    Liked by 3 people

    • waltherppk says:

      England shows why they got their ass stomped by Americans TWICE and would have gotten their ass stomped by Germany had America not intervened. Bunch of prissy muslim ass kissing dhimmis.

      Liked by 1 person

      • rf121 says:

        A little history revisionism going on here. Without the French, the American revolution would have failed. In WWI England was in no danger from Germany as the war was fought “over there” in France. But they did lose 700,000 men and that started their decline.

        Again WWII, Germany wanted to invade England but were unable. England at least entered the fight against the Nazi’s in ’39 while the US did nothing for three more years. Both wars had major impacts on the direction England took, including their populace. Getting bombed on a regular basis for many years has a slight impact on your opinion of war.

        Most of the immigrants (muslims) entering England in the 60’s and 70’s where from former Empire countries and therefore were English citizens. Sort of hard to deny entry to someone carrying a British passport. The radicalization did not really get going until the 80’s and it was the joining of the EU that screwed England as that is when the radicalized muslims got entry to England through the EU bridge.

        As far as the “Bunch of prissy muslim ass kissing dhimmis” that applies just as well to democrat policies here and are alive and well in the big US cities today. PT has put a stop to that mentality for now but we are just one election away from things heading right down the same road that England went.

        Liked by 5 people

        • waltherppk says:

          Trump only put a stop to that islamophile dhimmi mentality for those who ever had it and were needing to be attitude adjusted. My ancestral family arrived in America more than a hundred years before the revolution, and the revolution was a renewal of a blood feud that began with the tyrannical persecutions that caused the mass exodus to America. France helped but I think it is an exaggeration to say the outcome was determined by France. The slavery that is a muslim practice was a sin and poison that England embraced as “business” and exported to the colonies.

          Counter revolutionaries (with regards to the American Revolution) are domestic enemies…..not patriots or oath keepers.

          Liked by 1 person

        • waltherppk says:

          You might want to look up the Ottoman Empire


        • Let me emphasize your last point….. we were, and still are only one election away from heading down that same road that England took…… Had Hillary won in 2016, by the end of her 2nd term we would have been there.

          This is why, Deplorables, that 2018, 2020, 2022, and 2024 are existential election for this country!


        • JoAnn Leichliter says:



  7. waltherppk says:

    England might be every muslims bitch, but America isn’t and never will be.

    Liked by 2 people

    • rf121 says:

      Really. Ask the Mayors of New York, Chicago, and San Francisco. And don’t forget Minneapolis. I think their opinion would differ.

      Liked by 1 person

    • We’re a little behind and it just works different here ! What was it someone said ? Was it “two countries divided by a common language” ? I’ve had to decode American ways of doing things and cultural codes, pay the same respect to Britain.

      Liked by 1 person

      • waltherppk says:

        We aren’t behind at all, we are light years ahead and the counter-revolutionaries to the American Revolution should have given up their alliance with EVIL a long time ago…..including having too much confidence in principles of “English Law”. History has shown English Law can stand reality on its head when needed to serve an interest of the state that is against the interest of The People. The concept of natural rights and what are the natural rights of free men becomes too “flexible” under English Law in its application that differs for the common man as compared to privileged aristocrats. It is the same two tiered “justice system” as has become a problem for America. It seems what is the “law” to be applied depends entirely too much on a persons wealth and class and social status and individual liberty is just another manufactured product purchased in the marketplace. Under English Law any person is entitled to the best “justice” money can buy, until they meet a vigilante.


        • Kind of proves my point. You seem to be describing Britain as it was circa 1776. She ain’t perfect for sure. I’m well aware of your constitution and have long been inspired by America’s example but at the moment some seem to be using Britain as a kind of pawn in a global fight against extremist Islam. The issue is becoming too emotionally charged with important facts being missed. This is exactly what extremist Muslims want ! This is why Trump’s tweets need to be questioned in this case. He may by up to his usual tactics of courting controversy but Britain First is an organisation “looking for trouble” as Judge put it ( ). I’m not saying I agree at all with the obvious politically correct atmosphere surrounding Islam, but to assume – as Britain First do – that the court is “in on it” with Islam on that conviction is beyond silly. This is exactly why we have these laws. Some people may hate them but there is a wisdom to their existence and Judge’s are more than equipped to think beyond the Islamic furore issues. Your response seems like hyperbole to me. I recently won a legal action using Legal Aid. How is that “individual liberty is just another manufactured product purchased in the marketplace” ?


          • waltherppk says:

            If Britain First is looking for something it seems they are seeking a reckoning over the lost liberty of free speech and other lost liberty and lost security, particularly for women having been subjected to a rape epidemic perpetrated by muslims, that is directly attributable to an islamification of Britain by muslim immigrants. The devaluation of life and liberty caused by muslims is offensive and unacceptable to constituents of Britain First who see islam for exactly what it is, a dangerous ideology inconsistent with the principles of liberty and law and security that are more traditionally Western, secular, or Christian (and British).

            There is no moral high ground for courts who empower an alien culture to devalue life
            for its native citizens. The first duty of a government is to protect and defend the liberty
            and security of its native citizens, not be complicit with criminal constituents of an alien ideology it imports and allows such immigration to devalue the traditional society. When “law” is applied to enforce such an insult to the native population rebellion is assured.


  8. czarowniczy says:

    News tonite was all over Prince Harry’s American squeeze, Meghan Markle, leaving one of her dogs in the US. Of note is that in order to get your pooch into Britain it first must NOT be of the banned breeds the Brit government considers ‘dangerous’ to the public. It must be microchipped so it can be identified. It must have all of its vaccinations up to date. It needs a ‘pet passport’ and, if it’s from one of a long list of countries that are rabies-heavy, which includes all of the Mideast countries, must have a titer test to determine if the dog is hiding rabies.

    Yet to be a Moslem immigrant……

    Liked by 10 people

    • waltherppk says:

      Irony isn’t it that England would be so “sensitive” about the pedigree of mongrels.

      Liked by 4 people

    • kea25252014 says:

      Ohhh Burn….. or drop the mic. But that is very true.

      Liked by 2 people

      • czarowniczy says:

        Just musing on how the latest Moslem dawgz being imported seem to be hounding their hosts.
        BTW, seems that as the Brits uncover and thwart plots to conduct attacks on Brits by conveniently unnamed attackers the reports aren’t getting picked up by the MSM. My Brit news sources just mention two such plots recently but as hard as I scan the major network news there’s nothing there. Then again our national state of Moslem denial does make news such as the Chinese Victoria’s secret show that much more important.


    • JoAnn Leichliter says:

      I think a six month quarantine is standard, or at least it used to be, which is why so few people bring their dogs to England.

      Liked by 1 person

      • czarowniczy says:

        That’s what I thought too but I went to the Brit government site and it appears they’ve adopted a more rational and 21st century approach.
        I know when I worked for the Helmsleys in the early 70s they had some bucks-down residents who had alternate housing in Britain and managed get their pooches/cats in…guess its all in who you know if you’re wealthy ans Allah in who you know if you’re a meandering Moslem.


  9. kea25252014 says:

    SD I respect you but I disagree. I think this was just Trump pointing out what is wrong in the EU and saying you take care of yours we take care of ours. The fact that Trump has not been invited to the UK is telling. posts the issues and in the end Western EU will fall while Eastern EU will survive. Just like the USA

    Liked by 6 people

  10. bpk1300 says:

    well, went to Costco today and saw the Hildabeast book, and we laughed as we said “I Happened” with a smiling Donald Trump…… it!!!! Best meme evahhhhhhh

    Liked by 1 person

  11. POP says:

    The destruction of Britain happened when the left’s long march finally controlled education, from grade school to universities.
    The hapless kiddies were taught they were guilty non entities forced to worship failed, joke, 3rd world cultures as penance for colonialism (that saved most of its beneficiaries from primitive tribalism when they copied British institutional administration).
    The British kiddies have never recovered, there is no Trump there, just more self loathers who think everyone should.

    Liked by 2 people

  12. olderwiser21 says:

    I agree Scott – I think SD’s analysis of this was off.


  13. yakmaster2 says:

    Perhaps by re-tweeting Jayda Fransen of Britain First, POTUS wanted to draw attention to Britain’s facist attitude toward any political speech than runs contrary to their Liberal PC ideology. In effect, both Britain and Canada are making POLITICAL PRISONERS of dissidents under the guise of altruism.
    Now, where has history revealed this happening in the past?

    Also, ironically, in Britain, most Christian churches have jumped on the “bigotry” “racism” bandwagon to go beyond tolerating other religions to outright acquiescence and encouragement. In other words, the British Christian churches have apparently become a tool of the State.
    Now, where else are we seeing this happening more and more?

    So, to reiterate my main point, perhaps the discussions generated by outraged American, British, and Canadian journalists/politicos over the President’s re-tweets of a Britain First member is accomplishing something by dragging some peripheral facts into sunlight.

    Liked by 1 person

    • G. Combs says:

      It is President Trump’s usual tactic.
      Tweet something provocative and the Yellow Stream Media goes ballistic. This shines a spot light on the subject of the tweet. A subject the YSM would prefer swept under the rug.

      Liked by 1 person

  14. Awesom! Fearless bold and call it without any fear! May is a gutless wimp and can’t control her MPs in parliament. They are out of control! Nigel should have become the PM! Shame to England it’s in such sham!

    Liked by 1 person

  15. mobiuswolf says:

    I don’t envy him dealing with those two.


  16. Markus says:

    And what has the media done for 50years but find an incident, flash it on the television then full flat on their fainting couches in mock outrage.

    And as for unpresidential, who has spent the same five decades making a clown out of western decorum?

    Hypocrites, as always. What deserved medicine this Trump is for them.


  17. georgiafl says:

    Since its inception – Mohammedanism – aka Islam – has been a centuries long bloodbath.

    Around the world and especially in their home countries, Muslims kill each other even more than they do outsiders.

    There have been 32,154 documented deadly terrorist attacks committed by muslims since 9/11/01.

    2017 attacks –

    Graph – attacks by ideology:


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s