Sally Yates Testifies She Has Never Been Questioned By FBI About Intelligence Leaks to Media…

On March 20th 2017 FBI Director James Comey testified before congress. There is only ONE KNOWN Factual and CRIMINAL activity currently identified: the unmasking and leaking of Mike Flynn’s name to the media. Everything else is political. FBI Director Comey testified his organization was “investigating” intelligence leaks. (link)

During congressional testimony today former acting Attorney General Sally Yates answered a direct question from Senator Chuck Grassley about whether or not she has been questioned by the FBI about intelligence leaks to media.

@01:20 of the video segment below:

Grassley: “Have any of you been questioned by the FBI about any leaks?”
Clapper: “Uh, I have not been”
Yates: “No”


How can FBI Director James Comey testify to congress the FBI has an open investigation into the source of the Flynn intelligence leaks on March 20th, and yet the primary person who controlled that leaked information, acting AG Sally Yates, testifies on May 8th she has never been questioned by the FBI about the leaks?

This entry was posted in AG Jeff Sessions, Big Government, Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, Dept Of Justice, Jeff Sessions, media bias, NSA, President Trump, Uncategorized, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

457 Responses to Sally Yates Testifies She Has Never Been Questioned By FBI About Intelligence Leaks to Media…

  1. Katie says:

    Thank you so much, Sundance, for explaining all of what is happening in simple as terms as possible for an idiot who really doesn’t know anything and just really started trying to educate herself this past Presidential election cycle on politics and DC.

    Liked by 24 people

    • Oldschool says:

      Awww Katie, being a new student does not make anyone an idiot! It makes you a freshman. (Hope you don’t find that term gender offensive)

      Liked by 19 people

      • WSB says:

        Nothing better than fresh men…sorry, had to.

        Liked by 17 people

        • lmao! Guys love a woman that tells it like she sees it. 😉

          Liked by 1 person

        • dbobway says:

          Speaking of Fresh men,
          We have my Father, 40 years of guiding missiles and bombs from Korea to Vietnam.
          I’m his 62 year old son, making his bed and watching the Senate circus.
          He is 84 and quit watching Fox 24/7 about 5 years ago.
          “What are you watching?” “Fox News ” I said.
          “Well put on it on my TV”, and I did.
          Clapper answered a question, “He’s lying.”
          Yates answered a question, “She’s lying.”
          He didn’t know who they were or what their importance was.
          My Dad has his mind still, but he lost his filter.
          “Dad, how do you know their lying?”
          “What’s to tell, look at the vein’s on that woman’s neck,
          And that Clapper guy. He wouldn’t know the truth if he read it!”
          Not a partisan opinion,
          Just a smart old man with no filter!

          Liked by 33 people

      • Katie says:

        I still call all police officers policemen lol And thank you! I just read everyone else’s intelligent comments on here and I’m SO behind all of you!

        Liked by 7 people

        • Paul Killinger says:

          Don’t be so sure.

          It appears you’re about even with our current FBI Director.

          Liked by 6 people

          • Kent says:

            I love to tell the newbs at work…they’re so serious and don’t know us and the place can be intimidating for the inexperienced…(oil refinery)…

            “Nobody walked in the gate knowing how to run this place and there are no stupid questions….but there sure are a lot of inquisitive idiots!”….

            I lurk here because I DON’T KNOW MANY THINGS Katy….I’m here to learn.

            Liked by 7 people

        • maiingankwe says:

          Oh Katie, there are so many of us freshman here, I think you’d be surprised. No question is a dumb question as long as it’s honest. If we don’t ask, we don’t learn.

          Be well, and stay smiling, you’ve got this.

          Liked by 12 people

        • alliwantissometruth says:

          Katie, the only idiots are the ones who refuse to educate themselves & blindly follow a party or a political narrative

          Liked by 8 people

          • eagledriver50 says:

            Katie…pretty soon you will see a pattern emerging that the people in this Tree truly believe with every fiber of their being that Honesty, Truthfulness and Kindness go a long way. What you have experienced today is what I experienced also. Welcome to the Treehouse…P.S. Don’t ask who SD is either…they won’t say!!!


    • Brian L says:

      There is a difference between ignorance and idiocy.

      Liked by 1 person

    • CDuran says:

      Yes Thank you Sundance. What an arrogant display. These people should be in jail. I hate to see how Americans are helpless to brings these people to justice. Isn’t it WE THE PEOPLE…

      Liked by 4 people

    • Katie says:

      Katie – We all had to start our journey of enlightenment – just know that once you open the door, you can never go back to the ignorance or innocence we used to have.

      You’re in good company here at the Treehouse.

      Liked by 3 people

    • cjzak says:

      You’re doing just fine and we all were newbies at some point! Welcome to the best place on the internet for political discourse.Sundance is the great one who runs the program with excellence always. The people here have much information and knowledge to share and do so without judgement or ego and with warm acceptance. Except for the occasional troll who tries to break in and muck up the goodness. They learn in a hurry it won’t be tolerated. Enjoy and keep learning!

      Liked by 9 people

    • tellthetruth2016 says:

      What really scares me NOW after this circus from the GOP has people so pissed off and ready to throw these Politicians out that IF they DO NOT get on the TRUMP train, DemoRats will get voted back in the majority in the HOUSE come 2018…….RepubliRats are so against TRUMP taking their gravy train away from them that they would take the chance of giving the majority back to Pelosi, they are willing to eat their own to do it and be able to keep their special interest $$$…… It’s a Damn shame ……. TRUMP and SESSIONS need to start fighting as dirty as the DemoRats and holding every corrupted politicians dirty deed over their head ……..We have over 100 judicial seats still to be filled yet, And TRUMP or SESSIONS still do not have all their people confirmed ….. The big guns has to come out NOW because the enemy is coming from ALL sides….. Hitlery and Obozo are coming back on the scenes, LSM still hitting from all sides, NK threatening worse than ever, still have ISIS we’re fighting, AND, AND The Damn Corrupt, RATs Literally helping the Dems take back over…….. ADD, Lyin Ryan thinks he’s the President ……

      Liked by 1 person

      • margarite1 says:

        I was on Facebook yesterday…some of the things people I know post are just unbelievable and others agree with them. One was a video of a VERY ticked off blonde giving the finger to the camera and the caption was “being a woman is a pre-existing condition”. WHAT? It doesn’t even make sense except raw Trump hate.

        Liked by 2 people

      • ronheinzkaboot says:

        its like you were reading my mind. Exactly! Every point


    • Bailey02 says:

      Oops! I saw Sally’s pants on fire. !!

      Liked by 1 person

  2. CaliVet says:

    She and Elmer Fud are GUILTY! No question about it. It’s time to reintroduce the firing squad for those who commit TREASON!

    Liked by 12 people

    • MrE says:

      I was thinking Don Rickles’ evil ugly twin. But Elmer Fudd works too. 😉

      Completely agree, firing squad for treason, and then hang the bodies over the entrance to Congress as a warning.

      Liked by 7 people

      • CaliVet says:

        How could you disrespect Mr. Warmth like that. LOL
        RIP DON.

        Liked by 3 people

        • WSB says:

          Don was a PRINCE!

          Liked by 1 person

          • eagledriver50 says:

            Easy there com-padres!!!! What is coming their way is nothing like it before. Don’t forget…Yates/Clapper GAVE information to organizations that was not ON A LIST. That is a FELONY…PDJT knows this and so does A.G. SESSIONS…their time is coming, the hammer will fall and it will not be nice to either one of them…BUT PATIENCE is required…PDJT knew this was going to be a circus BUT he has them on record…WITH THEIR VERY OWN ANSWERS…Can’t get much better than that!!!

            Liked by 5 people

    • dbobway says:

      I wish I was Senator for a day and on that committee. I have questions.

      “Ms. Yates”

      I would like to get on the record, what part of the Presidents executive order did you specifically considered un-Constitutional?

      Would you consider the travel bans, former Presidents Obama on 2 occasions and Carter one time, of countries also named by President Trump, were as un-Constitutional?
      All 3 of these travel bans were enacted when known terrorists had entered US as refugees, how was President Trump’s any different? He was Leary of the present vetting system of these countries. The security of this country is on his watch.

      Do you Ms. Yates consider your position is as important as the President’s on the matter of the security of American citizens?

      Do you think as a member of the DOJ, under former President Obama,the vetting of refugees was adequate to separate the refugees and terrorists who pretend to be, from terrorists that mean our country harm?

      Would you stake the lives of Americans on the system of vetting you over saw?

      If the vetting process was not under your responsibility, what makes President Trump’s actions on the same matter, your responsibility?

      You have judged a decorated General to be have committed crimes against our country without due process. Is that also within your power as acting DOJ?

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Donna in Oregon says:

    Didn’t James Comey do the same thing with Hillary’s emails? This “investigation” seems to be using the same tactics.

    Liked by 6 people

    • Sentient says:

      In Comey’s defense, he wouldn’t need to interview them if he knew he was the leaker.

      Liked by 5 people

      • nimrodman says:

        Comey’s too busy Understanding the ‘Journey of Black America’

        … and he’s off on a big jag about “hate crime”. I suggest he start with that 68-yr-old white woman attacked at the pool party yesterday.

        “We must do a better job of tracking and reporting hate crime to fully understand what’s happening in our communities and in our country so we can stop it,” he continued. “Some jurisdictions do not report hate crime data. Some say there were no hate crimes in their jurisdiction, which would be awesome if it were true. … It’s not something we can ignore, not something we can sweep under the rug, even though it’s painful.”

        Comey: Law Enforcement Needs to Do Better Job Understanding the ‘Journey of Black America’

        Liked by 8 people

        • wolfmoon1776 says:

          Sounds like Comey wants “protection” from the anti-Trump left, so he’s virtue signaling as hard as he can.

          What Comey fails to understand is the sneaky communist truth that “coddling” and “sympathy” as a response to historic racism was never intended to fix the situation – it was designed to aggravate it into violent revolution. Comey fails to realize that treating blacks equally would have meant arresting his boss as surely as if she had been a white criminal. Equality means holding blacks to the same standards of respect AND expectation as everybody else.

          That’s where all the anger-porn slavery movies coming out of Hollywood truly give away the show. They are FEEDING the left’s last-chance hope of violent revolution. They aren’t trying to make whites respect blacks. They’re making blacks hate whites.

          The more Comey treats blacks sympathetically, the more he’s NOT treating them respectfully, as fellow Americans.

          Liked by 6 people

        • ronheinzkaboot says:

          Notice during his hearing one of the FBI accomplishments he had to crow about was uncovering who was behind all those JCC bomb threats that the MSM dutifully reported as Trump inspired and HRC came out of the woods to chastise Trump about.
          While Mr. Comey colorfully regaled how horrible these “hate crimes” were and how important it was for the FBI to crack these cases, he never mentioned the two perpetrators were a leftie Anti-Trump journalist and a anti-Trump leftie Jewish teenager.
          Those aren’t hate crimes they are hoaxes intended to seditiously smear POTUS.


        • JoAnn Leichliter says:

          A crime is a crime, and trying to guess everyone’s motive is a waste of time.

          Liked by 1 person

          • LEET says:

            JoAnn Leichter:
            I beg to differ. Truth matters and so does the motive of the two who were caught. Peddle that “it does not matter” somewhere else!


  4. Here I go again,,,,,,,,,,,i only post when I am so mad that I can’t take it anymore, This seems to be one of those days. I actually knew this all along, but this congress (and I mean everyone of them) is doing absolutely nothing but spending our money. This is a total waste of time. I have young great grandchildren that could do a much better job. I have also learned today that President Trump has zero friends in congress and neither do we. They could be doing something more worthwhile like work instead of sitting there looking important and smug, which they are not.

    Liked by 22 people

    • Pete says:

      My recurring statement regarding our elected officials (both parties): they live like royalty on our dime. Why would they want to solve anything or rock the boat?

      Liked by 8 people

    • Weeper says:

      Hi oneofthecrazies – I’m mad everyday it seems. Posting here is great therapy for me. Come join in sometime when we’re just being silly. If you have great grandchildren, I’m sure you have great knowledge and experience to share (I’m a grandparent myself)!!! 😀

      MAGA!!! 🦁

      Liked by 11 people

      • I read the comments everyday and everyone keeps me informed. TODAY i wanted to watch the hearings and that was a big mistake. I am 75 years old and very healthy other than having to watch my blood pressure. Government sure knows how to make it rise.

        Liked by 6 people

  5. ecmarsh says:

    I think old Clapper is quite an intelligent man. That is why he is put up for display.
    Then there is Sally Yates, and I thank God I am not married to a woman like that.
    I watched some of it and these senators are just as bad as the interviews.
    And why the hell does it cost tax payers money when these people are holding hearings? Do they get hazardous duty pay or something?

    Liked by 5 people

  6. Mr. Morris says:

    God bless Judicial Watch! Will her emails reveal some of the intelligence people she colluded with? Let’s find out about the illegal unmasking, and surveillance of American Citizens.

    Liked by 4 people

  7. David says:

    The Globalist, Media, Left and the Elitist are taking nothing and making it a Major Story which will continue through 2020.

    The Corruption/Treason/Sedition is there waiting to be investigated by Grand Juries (Clinton Foundation, Emails etc). President Trump, Voters, Rule of Law and the United States would WIN the war easily.

    Destroy them or let them Destroy us by Fake News and Dust.

    President Trump/Session is holding all the Aces to Win.

    Liked by 3 people

    • singingsoul says:

      With the win of globalists in France I wonder if globalists feel empowered anew to take on POTUS even if it is fabricated. How dos on fight this…? This is serious and Comey is dangerous.

      Liked by 2 people

      • David says:

        The Globalists/Media/Left and Clinton’s created the fake/fabricated News and they empowered themselves way before the Nov. 8th election. Grand Juries Investigations regarding the Clinton Emails, Clinton Foundation etc. will flush out everyone in the Corrupt Swamp.


      • eagledriver50 says:

        Comey is NOT dangerous…Did not want to “Like” but to reply…The con critters are outing themselves. It takes a while to make a case and the case is being made. PDJT wanted these Yates but got Clapper also. THIS WAS DONE INTENTIONALLY BY THE CON CRITTERS. PDJT and A.G. Sessions needed to see how far the rat hole went. Also, this puts everyone on tape and in testimony UNDER OATH. So any lies they say, even parsel tonguing will do them now good.


  8. patrickhenrycensored says:

    Any guesses on how long before Trump closes the deal on comey?

    Liked by 7 people

  9. Oldskool says:

    The best way to either end all these BS hearings or make them get real interesting real fast would be for PTrump to proclaim any information related to this issue as declassified. All of a sudden then, no veil for the questionees to hide behind.There is nothing there to damage the President, but plenty to expose the committee members, Obama’s crew and the IC to.

    Liked by 16 people

  10. ecmarsh says:

    My oldest served under Flynn.
    General Flynn is a man you (I ) wouldn’t want to challenge to a duel. From my report this little general is one wirely little feller and you (I) would die by the sword.
    Man’s gotta know his limitations.

    Liked by 7 people

  11. jstanley01 says:

    It is a reasonable inference that Comey lied.

    Liked by 3 people

  12. Rainy says:

    I don’t believe a word these two say.

    Liked by 2 people

  13. john lorenz says:

    Did anyone hear the term “COLLUSION” with the Trump campaign of Russian “hacking” (still undefined) in the election? Me neither. The Demshevik wet dream of the elusive Russian collusion unicorn lives on.

    Liked by 3 people

  14. Neural says:

    Treason is, as treason does. It’s time to start trying people for treason, and sticking to the punishment intended if found guilty.

    Liked by 5 people

  15. pcockroft says:

    Sundance why didn’t you inform us that the state department is being run by Condoleeza Rice a never Trumper. Her best friend is Donna Breazeale who gave Hillary the debate questions for the second debate. When Tillerson is gone she and the Obama crew run this agency and we get all these Muslim refugees whom the taxpayer supports and pays to come and live here. Joy, joy.


    • Mikayla825 says:

      Say that again, this time preferably in English. Thank you.

      Liked by 3 people

    • Sandra-VA says:

      What? Condoleeza Rice has been out of office for many years now. She was SoS for G.W.Bush.

      Susan Rice was the UN Ambassador (lied about Benghazi) and then got “promoted” to National Security Advisor. Perhaps this is who you mean? But she is also GONE GONE GONE.

      When Tillerson is gone, either President Trump appoints a new SoS or the new President will do so….

      By the way, Obama cannot run for President again.

      Liked by 7 people

  16. WeThePeople2016 says:

    For the life of me, I could not understand why Trump did not request that Comey resign from his post. Then, it dawned on me that Trump is letting Comey hang himself with his testimonies and behavior. Almost every time he opens his mouth, he contradicts himself. I do not trust Comey, and even worse, his sidekick McCabe. Both of them need to be removed. I think that he must be serving a purpose for Trump at this time, and we just don’t know what that is yet. It will be revealed all in good time.

    Liked by 13 people

  17. ecmarsh says:

    Just watched the video with Grassley. Here in Iowa, Grassley is like Gov. Branstad, if they run they will win. Both are hard nosed old Iowas. I posted I was not going to vote for Grassley the last time around.
    A TREEPER chewed my butt, so I voted for him. This clip made me glad I did!

    Liked by 11 people

    • Sentient says:

      Grassley’s as good as it gets in the US senate. He tried to fix the 2013 Gang of Eight open borders amnesty bill by making any regularization contingent upon verification by a supermajority in both houses that the border had been sealed. His amendment went nowhere.

      Liked by 5 people

    • Love watching Senator Grassley. His Judiciary Committee hearing was quite revealing last week. He is really digging into the facts around the “dossier” His questions are always right on target and eye opening. One of my favorites! We need to keep him in our prayers as he wades through the swamp.

      Liked by 2 people

    • yakmaster2 says:

      Wasn’t it Grassley who asked the million dollar question today: “Have either of you seen the UNMASKED names of Trump associates in Intelligence reports?” Answer from both: “Yes.”
      Bam! Surveillance, surveillance, and more surveillance of Trump “associates.” That makes the “wiretapping” tweets a lot less ridiculous, now don’t it?

      Liked by 5 people

  18. NJF says:

    Well we also still haven’t heard from the coast guard & merchant marines either…..

    Liked by 22 people

  19. Jim Peters says:

    The only way I can explain Trump’s failure togo hard against Obama and his people is that he’s waiting to calibrate the blows with the mid term elections.

    If what is coming out almost daily now is true, we’re talking about an unprecedented domestic espionage scheme involving Obama’s key people, but also implicating Dems in Congress. If Trump holds all the cards, he has a reasonable chance of effectively destroying the Democratic Party.

    If he plays his hand now, the Dems/MSM complex will use every trick in the book to.minimize the impact. However if he times everything to drop (say) 2 weeks out from election day, it will be too.late for.the Dems to wriggle out.

    At least that’s my take on what’s happening.

    Liked by 15 people

    • Nice Take, Jim.

      The challenge he’s got is how to take the Dem Wing of the Uniparty without triggering the RINO Wing to neutralize his actions.

      As President Trump reminds us, “Complicated business, folks, complicated business.”

      Liked by 12 people

      • Jim Peters says:

        The clownshow we are seeing in these hearings is frustrating to watch, but is useful to Trump. It builds public disgust with the swamp and will ensure public approval & support when Trump decides to go after these people outside the Congress.

        At the end of the day he only has a few options : 1. Do nothing – doubtful. 2. One massive hit – multiple arrests on one day, done in a very public way to maximize damage 3. Selective hits done sequentially (eg one a week) – this may be the most effective, but he will need to get going soon.

        It would be fascinating to know what is going on behind the scenes. I’d assume Bannon & Nunes have quite a few whistleblowers who have come forward. It would be worth them being patient, so the cases are absolutely watertight, esp if they are close to nailing Obama himself.

        Of course there’s always the possibility that Trump has nothing and is bluffing. I’d rate that as a very low possibility, though – I am pretty sure he has a lot of extremely incriminating evidence, given the very aggressive tweets etc.

        Liked by 6 people

      • WSB says:

        Perfection, Black Knight! Perfection! It IS the UniParty…

        Liked by 5 people

  20. President Trump plays the “long game”.

    Congress is proving their INCOMPETENCE to investigage and produce an OUTCOME for JUSTICE.

    The FBI’s Comey is proving his INCOMPETENCE to investigate and produce an OUTCOME for JUSTICE.

    We have EVERYONE alleging that Russia has hacked whatever yet failing to produce the EVIDENCE required to PROSECUTE.

    We have EVERYWHERE the evidence of LEAKS that demonstrate our NATIONAL SECURITY is at YUGE risk.

    After a year of this, President Trump will state the obvious and demand that Congress approve a new FBI Director to do the job they couldn’t.

    Liked by 14 people

    • Kaco says:

      What you posted is it. Only thing I would add is to confront Congressional committee members they are incompetent or corrupted. Pick one, there is no third option.


  21. nimrodman says:

    Article nicely points out that Comey testified last week Huma Abedin REGULARLY forwarded Clinton emails to husband Wiener “to print out” (including classified emails).

    Huma previously testified she had no idea how “her” (Abedin’s) emails ended up on Wiener’s computer and was “taken aback” to learn they were.

    It’s either one or the other, which is it? And who’s misstating the situation?
    It’s easily proven, Emails have headers, you know – like To: and From:

    FBI’s Comey Debunks Huma Abedin’s Excuse for Clinton Emails Appearing on Anthony Weiner’s Laptop

    Liked by 7 people

    • nimrodman says:

      Liked by 2 people

    • judyw says:

      “emails have headers” but according to research by George Webb the network was set up with blackberry servers that synced all 19 and Anthony Weiner’s laptop so that anytime an email was sent/received the blackberry devices and other devices on their network received the same information. George published the SS#’s of several involved and has Andrew McCabe right where he needs to be just before the lid blows, I believe.
      If you haven’t seen his youtube’s, maybe this will explain some of what he has uncovered.

      Liked by 3 people

      • nimrodman says:

        Thanks much, judyw, that sounds much deeper than the relatively superficial article I posted.

        I haven’t watched the video yet, but from your statements about the server setup, I think I understand that it would have routed emails to all members included in a particular defined group, so that the simple From: and To: routing presumed for a given email is no longer true or necessary.

        If so, that may indicate that Comey is ignorant of that distinction when he claims Huma forwarded to Wiener.

        Either Huma forwarded explicitly to Wiener, as Comey portrays, or Wiener’s computer received emails as a server-defined broadcast to a bunch of recipients, as I think the George Web description is portraying.

        If the former, then Comey’s claim is acceptable at face value. If the latter is true, that would suggest that Comey is unaware of the distinction, the server auto-routing of emails out to a group of addresses.

        If true and if Comey is indeed ignorant of that, it doesn’t speak very highly of “Mr Ongoing Investigation”.

        That investigation don’t amount to much if the highest law-enforcement investigator in the land isn’t more up-to-speed than that.

        What’d Shania Twain say? “That Don’t Impress Me Much”


        • MaineCoon says:

          “If the former, then Comey’s claim is acceptable at face value. If the latter is true, that would suggest that Comey is unaware of the distinction, the server auto-routing of emails out to a group of addresses.”

          IMO Comey would know of this auto-routing capability. He is the top spook at a top investigatory spook agency. I believe Comey also knows that most people aren’t knowledgeable in auto-routing of emails; therefore, he can answer questioning without taking that aspect into account. Just play dumb as some of the questioners who were didn’t know of this aspect.

          Where are those darn Awan brothers when congress needs their IT expertise to brief those concritters before the hearing?

          Liked by 1 person

          • nimrodman says:

            “IMO Comey would know of this auto-routing capability. He is the top spook at a top investigatory spook agency.”

            Yeah, I’d think so too. If so, however, that means Comey intentionally misrepresented the situation in Congressional testimony. From the Breitbart article I posted:

            KENNEDY: OK. Was there classified information on – on former Congressman Weiner’s computer?
            COMEY: Yes.

            KENNEDY: Who sent it to him?
            COMEY: His then spouse, Huma Abedin, appears to have had a regular practice of forwarding e-mails to him, for him I think to print out for her so she could then deliver them to the Secretary of State.

            Aside –
            ** What,. they don’t have printers at the office? **
            That excuse is ludicrous no matter who’s making it.


        • judyw says:

          When George Webb broke the server story it made it all make sense to me. Although illegal, it is a brilliant use of technology to bypass the regular method of transferring data between computers which leaves “fingerprints of to/from” and plausible deniability they are all currently using of “somehow this happened”. sssshhhssh! And you are so right in they can speak to the low level of understanding of technology that most people have.
          Remember in the beginning “no classified information” then “no information marked classified”…..

          These blackberry devices were not issued by the State Department. The Awan brothers who have been working in the U S government traveling back and forth from Pakistan since the 90’s with high level security clearances and who have off site servers of their own set this up for Hillary. They are considered very powerful in U S politics by their home country and are escorted by security when they are there.

          A Marine lives in one of the twelve houses owned by the Awans reported to George that when he moved in there was a pile of laptops and a pile of blackberry devices with government markings someone left behind. He also reported this to FBI.

          Comey knows all of this and what was found on Weiner’s laptop by NYPD is the core of all that’s compromised those DC swamp dwellers who will never see the light of another day when it breaks.

          Liked by 1 person

          • nimrodman says:

            Thanks again for the illumination, judy.

            “… a brilliant use of technology to bypass the regular method of transferring data between computers which leaves “fingerprints of to/from” and plausible deniability they are all currently using of “somehow this happened”. ”

            And so I’d wager that there were back doors set up so Mo Brotherhood could listen in as well, that was the speculation about Hillary’s server when that story was first going around. The Awan Brothers being perhaps the most recent facilitators to be caught in the news, but likely predecessors as well – pipelines for getting America’s classified information out into the favored hands of such denizens as ValJar and Barky.

            Liked by 1 person

    • yucki says:

      She a Muslim Brotherhood Princess. Untouchable so far.
      “How big was influence of Huma Abedin’s family?”
      ‘It’s so egregious how they think they can just get away with abusing the system’

      A prominent Washington watchdog group has filed a request with the U.S. State Department for copies of all communications between former Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin and members of her family now under federal indictment as part of an investigation into what it suspects is a major “influence-peddling” operation.

      As deputy chief of staff for former Secretary of State Clinton, Abedin agreed to arrange State Department meetings with business partners of her first cousin, who is now under federal indictment for fraud. The partners scored at least $1.3 million in federal grant money, as WND first reported last week.

      “Influence-peddling is putting it nicely,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said, adding that the deal “warrants further investigation.”

      Influence peddling, sure. Spying, ditto. Conduit for info about operations in Libya, facilitating the overthrow of Mubarak, that’s a whole different order of crime.

      Liked by 4 people

    • WSB says:

      If this were an X rated site, nimrodman! What the heck were Weiner and Abedin thinking?????????!!!!!!!!

      Liked by 1 person

  22. Duckman says:

    OK, so they lied. Isn’t it a crime to lie to congress? Under oath? So, where is the master at arms to arrest them? Time to start taking these folks to the woodshed.

    Liked by 7 people

  23. litlbit2 says:

    The best daily soap opera watching all The characters, you know the names and the promoters. As The Screw Turns.

    More popcorn, the electorate is much, much wiser 2018

    Liked by 2 people

  24. Lawrence says:

    I wouldn’t get frustrated about any of this.
    HRC: “Im glad Donald Trump isn’t in charge of the law.”
    PDJT: “Cause you’d be in jail.”
    Unless you believe PDJT was just kidding when he said that at the debate.

    We’re dealing with lazy, sloppy, arrogant people who WILL slip up. All it takes is one and the cascade begins. But they also have a lot of power, and the judiciary is corrupted so it takes time to lineup enough hard evidence and good judges to begin the drainage. This isn’t done in 18 months.

    If the President went after Hillary out of the gate, he would have lost. Patience.

    Liked by 8 people

    • arete55 says:

      In agreement…

      Trump will predictably hold his fire until he has the full ‘take down’ in place…This requires that the DOJ (Sessions) has corralled the dept and developed “air tight” indictments….These weasels have not experienced the energy toward retribution that is in store for them…Kim Jong-un is already understanding the pressure of that tightening wall…

      Any Obama law-breaker goes to sleep every night countering the days remaining of their personal “Statute of limitations”…..There will be deals struck….8 years of tossin and turnin each night can be a very long time…

      Liked by 2 people

  25. sickconservative says:

    Only saw bits and pieces but from that all I can see coming from this is nothing.
    The DOJ is our only hope at this point.


  26. joanfoster says:

    As nauseating as it was, I watched a lot of this theater on Fox today. Frankly, absolutely nothing will happen to these liars because the Democrats on the committee will have their backs. It’s a waste of time and energy to get our hopes up. Congress and the entire government is corrupt. Nothing, absolutely nothing will be done with these criminals. Not wanting to divulge classified information is the new 5th amendment. Congress bought these testimonies today hook, line and sinker. I am disgusted that I wasted my time.Crapper, Comey and Yates are a collective cesspool of sh*t.

    Liked by 2 people

    • sickconservative says:

      That’s where we are stuck at this point, pontification is all we have but again will do nothing as usual.


  27. andi lee says:

    Oh, snap!
    That’s what this hearing was about – DAMAGE CONTROL!

    ~ Protecting the use of SECTION 702!
    (Lazy ucks forgot how to sleuth it old school!)

    Liked by 1 person

  28. Anne says:

    This guy is an opinion-columnist for Middle East Eye, a pro-Muslim Brotherhood Media:


  29. andi lee says:


    Forgot about this!

    Multiple people had access without clearances. No problem.

    Liked by 4 people

  30. jstanley01 says:

    The Flynn story is a sideshow, and the questioning on the EO was off topic. This committee called these hearings to investigate the Russian hack, am I right? So what about the Russian hack? I wanna know how Russia hacked the election! I WANNA KNOW ABOUT THE RUSSIAN HACK!!!


  31. Martin says:

    Liked by 5 people

  32. Guffman says:

    All so predictable. Whenever any question of real substance is asked, Clapper, and especially Yates, trot our the ‘I can’t discuss classified intel in this forum’ well-rehearsed, go-to line. It’s their get out of jail free card for every substantive question..
    This whole kangaroo court is such a farce.

    Liked by 2 people

  33. Daniel says:

    In the exchange between Cruz and Yates, Cruz cites USC 1182. But before reading that portion of the law to her, she says she’s not familiar with it. This is PERJURY. We can see that because she rebuts Cruz’s recitation of 1182 with her prepared reading of 1152 and claims that 1152 supercedes 1182. So she claims no familiarity with it then rebuts with a prepared reading of the copy of 1152.

    That’s a problem. But it’s worse and more stupid than that. 1182 covers presidential discretion powers over ENTRY into the US. 1152 covers State Department policy limitations. The President is not a member of the state department and he does not approve or deny visa applications. He may, as 1182 states, DENY ENTRY.

    USC 1152 does not cover presidential discretion powers. It covers the state department’s limits on visa processing.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Howie says:

      She feels her lying is justified. She is a Social Justice fanatic.

      Liked by 1 person

      • MVW says:

        My explanation on o’l Sally Yikes:
        We live in an alternate Universe, and I have no explanation how that happened. Just one day the country got confused, communism was repackaged, relabeled, Americans voted for a man with a secret background, and the media hyped him because he was good at reading from a teleprompter. Presto, President Obama, etc.

        So, here we are in this alternate universe, and there is no waking up from it. Somewhere though I am hoping someone finds the big switch and flips it back from evil to good.

        Liked by 2 people

      • MaineCoon says:

        Just like Taqiyya – justified lying in Islam.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Your Tour Guide says:

        Marinated in Emory, sautéed in wealth, gifted with a last name
        that has been elected to at least 3 county, state, and federal
        offices that I can name of. Sally’s the little Atlanta area disaster

        Liked by 1 person

  34. Wayne Robinson says:

    The intro says it all. The reason she was not asked about it , was that more than likely the leaks were coming from those in position to ask her. Simple deal


  35. gary says:

    now will Comey give immunity deals to Sally Yates and the other Dem-operatives that leaked and spying on Trump Team?

    You bet ya! That is what was done with the Clinton gang.

    Comey needs to go!

    Liked by 2 people

    • eagledriver50 says:

      No can do…once the testimony is in record or whatever is said in public forum CANNOT be re-classified. Better to fence off the information and move-on. Does not draw attention to that detail…


  36. georgiafl says:

    Honorable they ain’t.

    Neither of them.

    Liked by 2 people

  37. b4im2old says:

    Speaking of Yates, ck this out – read the whole thing and be sure to watch the 10 min embedded video (not the one with Cruz, but the 2nd one. Hopefully this would give PDJT and the DOJ a start in overturning POTUS’ ban that was twice stopped by the 9th! He is doing all he can to protect us, and if these judge’s unconstitutional rulings result in injuries or death of Americans on our shores, I pray they will be held personally responsible! (But unfortunately I realize given most gov entities “governmental immunity act” protections, doing so may be difficult to reach the burden of proof required to hold them PERSONALLY responsible. At the local level I’ve seen it happen, so there is a glimmer of hope!)


  38. Comrade Mope says:

    I think we have finally nailed down the allegations. This screenshot is from 3:09:03 of

    At 3:11:00 Mr Whitehouse goes into which allegations Clapper can verify. (He claims to be able to verify the top three.)
    1) Propaganda, Fake News, Trolls and Bots.
    2) Hacking and Theft of political information
    3) Timed leaks of damaging information
    1) Sounds like CNN, CBS, MSNBC and David “AstroTurf” Axelrod
    2) The FBI was not allowed to examine the DNC server, so hacking and theft cannot be verified
    3) Timed leaks have been around for decades. We now call them the October surprise.
    4) Odd they should mention Seth Rich
    These people are blaming Russia for the exact things Obama did in the Israeli elections and probably elsewhere. Why is it OK for us to do what we condemn the Russian for doing?

    Liked by 1 person

  39. vexedmi says:

    The Echo Chamber — “No-No”, “Maybe-Maybe”, “Not here-Not here”, “No-No”.
    What a waste of time of prying out the truth. The skullduggery continues.


  40. Lburg says:

    After further reflection (just because I’m incensed by Yates in particular) the questions should have been
    “When did you become aware of the unmasking of General Flynn’s name?”
    “Under what circumstances were you made aware of the unmasking?”
    “When was the last time you met with Evelyn Farkas?”


  41. Rick says:

    Unfortunately these hearings have become a joke.
    Witnesses lie with impunity, nothing is ever pressed.
    Nobody is ever held accountable.


  42. Pingback: Yates Testifies She Has Never Been Questioned By FBI About Intelligence Leaks to Media | WCBM-AM

  43. Kaco says:

    Thanks for this, very interesting.

    Liked by 1 person

  44. After just 24 hours, this thread is already aging quite nicely. 🙂


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s