Comrades, Dr. Farkas Has Discovered Russian Plot To Her Words in Mouth…

Comrade Treeperski, Dr Farkas has discovered Russian plot making her to speak too much with Comrade Brzezinski:

.

Comrade citizens, we must develop alternative “sources and methods”.  Who is this Comrade Wikipedia and how do we talk him?

“I was urging my former colleagues, and, and frankly speaking the people on the Hill [Democrat politicians], it was more actually aimed at telling the Hill people, get as much information as you can – get as much intelligence as you can – before President Obama leaves the administration.”

“Because I had a fear that somehow that information would disappear with the senior [Obama] people who left; so it would be hidden away in the bureaucracy, um, that the Trump folks – if they found out HOW we knew what we knew about their, the Trump staff, dealing with Russians – that they would try to compromise those sources and methods; meaning we no longer have access to that intelligence.”

“So I became very worried because not enough was coming out into the open and I knew that there was more.  We have very good intelligence on Russia; so then I had talked to some of my former colleagues and I knew that they were also trying to help get information to the hill.  … But that’s why you had the leaking.”

.

 

This entry was posted in Dem Hypocrisy, media bias, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Russia, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

778 Responses to Comrades, Dr. Farkas Has Discovered Russian Plot To Her Words in Mouth…

  1. Tejas Rob says:

    Your words is belong to politburo now.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. CJ says:

    Is Farkus being used? Or is she purposely spreading misinformation. She was a Hillary foreign policy advisor. We know the Russian narative is false but the left neocons are still pushing that meme. The left neocons do not care about Obama. They are more upset that Hillary lost and their march to war is on the back burner.

    We also know that the information Nunes got is not about Russia. So isn’t it convient to revive the Russia meme and breathe new life into that boggyman?

    We need to chill!

    Liked by 7 people

    • wolfmoon1776 says:

      I’m having too much fun destroying the Obama Legacy and the Hillary Future with every Fark-up this chick makes. NO WAY am I going to chill! Sorry! 😉

      Liked by 11 people

      • CJ says:

        MSNBC home of fake news. So why does anyone think this story is true? Dr. Farkus, (who is a paid consultant at MSNBC) and Mika sit down over lattes and hash out what was going to be asked and what the response should be. Oops! I miss spoke is their over. They both want to push the Russian narative.

        Liked by 4 people

        • wolfmoon1776 says:

          Exactly. The real story is in their errors. THAT is where the greater truth slips through.

          The secret in dealing with disinformation is to avoid the old temptation to oversimplify – to “discount” all of a particular witness’s testimony because “they’re a liar”, or to believe everything because “they’re honest”. An honest person can repeat disinformation as easily as a liar, and much more effectively. The trick is to sort it out, deconstruct, and use logic. It’s funny – I rarely consider any testimony impeached now. I find lies refreshingly useful, actually, when coming from a witness that I know is lying. Lies have so much motivation component. Very useful. They carry more information than blindly spoken truth.

          I really have been following the Clintons too long.

          Liked by 4 people

          • QuestGirl says:

            Lies are telling, aren’t they. Liars always tell on themselves, eventually. Like timelines, the truth is ferreted out when one begins to ask the liar questions, and they hate questions.

            Liked by 3 people

            • wolfmoon1776 says:

              I wanted to put up SD’s favorite image about this:

              But on the way to finding it, I got sidetracked by this video:

              I love that the character gets all philosophical and metaphysical / physical about the negative stuff, but yet I find it a dangerous and very sneaky form of cultural Marxism. Kinda like – “Hey – you – over there getting too close to God. Check out this very smart but very demoralizing shiny object.”

              Sure, Hollywood. Anything you say. (Cross still there? CHECK.)

              But back to that whole thing, you’re absolutely right about questions. Even the people who WANT the truth and think they have the truth – sometimes you just have to sigh – take a deep breath – and ask even MORE questions.

              The thing is, much of what she says is true, at some level outside the relevant facts, and that’s why the whole thing is such a good disinfo job. I think the main problem is that the more earnest (even if agenda-driven) people like Farkas were looking at a hole in the ground that somebody told them was a rabbithole, and they expected to find a rabbit. They were SURE there was a rabbit – a rabbit named Donald Trump – who was playing Bugs Bunny against the wonderful Hillary Clinton.

              The problem is, the hole wasn’t dug by a rabbit, and they never asked the question – Who really dug this hole? Was it the people who asked me to look at it? So, if you’re actually following the story, you know it was dug by somebody like Ben Rhodes, with the able assistance of people like Brennan and Clapper. She got baited into giving the diagnosis that was needed, and taking the story where they knew they needed it to go. This woman was played every which way, including extra dimensions. But when you come right down to it, she’s the opposite of an idiot savant – she’s a savant idiot. Her Freudian slip betrays the truth – she knows everything about Wikipedia and nothing about Wikileaks (other than some likely embarrassment at her resume showing up in Podesta’s email), meaning she’s clueless about the dark side of the Clintons. Lacking that, she has no business even rendering an opinion – which is why she’s PERFECT for rendering the opinions they needed.

              Fun times.

              Yeah. Time to ask the right f***ing questions.

              Liked by 3 people

              • QuestGirl says:

                The “right f*cking questions” require the details to be answered, and liars don’t like the details.

                “You don’t need a good memory when you tell the truth.” Judge Judy.

                I don’t think Farkas lied, but I do think she was setup. I just have yet to figure the why. Her anxious excitement in spilling this “intelligence” info is palatable.

                I love the timelines. So few articles nail, in black and white, the timelines. Where, When, What, Who, Why and How journalism is a lost art, apparently. So sad. Bigly sad.

                Liked by 1 person

                • Benson II says:

                  Just because someone has a high position and responsibility and access to information doesn’t mean they are smart. Especially if they were in the Obama Marxist fold. This chick is dumb as a rock. No one had to set her up. Look at her feeble and utterly laughable attempts to back track on what’s shes said. It’s been awhile since I’ve seen anyone dig this fast for this long trying to get out of the hole their in. She’s in over her head and still digging.

                  Liked by 1 person

                • Old Codger says:

                  What I want to know about Farkas: If you pop her massively bulging eyes, do her brains explode outward???

                  Maybe she’s just a “Roger Rabbit”-like cartoon character, like the bulgey-eyed Judge Doom ?

                  Liked by 1 person

                • wolfmoon1776 says:

                  Love the Judge Judy quote! She is most awesome.

                  Yes – Farkas seems very excited – absolutely convinced that Trump is guilty, guilty, guilty.

                  I think she was “spot-gas-lit” – scammed with a story just for her. Basically, Deep State (who are master storytellers) came up with a good, plausible set of rumors and fake hints of confirmation, and she fell for it like a rock.

                  It’s her earnestness that sells the story. THAT is why they set her up. She adds believability to the story.

                  They probably presented her with a lot of “Trump guilt” that she wasn’t allowed to actually see. Just some tantalizing hints, with juicy details, that would assure impeachment. Probably implications that Trump KNEW of the bad stuff by the Russians that was being hinted at.

                  She’s clearly WAY too innocent. People like her – who are a dime a dozen in academia – are so easy to fool.

                  The thing is, the (likely) Rhodes story can’t beat the spoilers, when the plot is so obvious. And I’m seeing others on the net who are seeing exactly what I’m seeing, and some of them are seeing parts of the set-up that just blow my mind, and I never imagined (like how Yates was backed up by an obscure Obama EA/EO that would have left Trump defenseless). When I understood that part of the plot, I realized that these people are utterly evil.

                  Stock up on provisions of all necessary kinds. I suspect that the core guilty will order violence when the law closes in on them.

                  Like

                • QuestGirl says:

                  It’s frightening. Yet, I am beginning to suspect that OUR PDJT has been aware for at least two decades, his Clinton days. I suspect he coddled them, really…while he gathered. Also, he has stuck to his belief system dating clear back to the 1980’s, and remain consistent. At least in snippets I’ve seen. That’s the root of my admiration for The Man!!!

                  Thank you, WolfMoon1776, for all the information provided here on TCTH. It is always enlightening.

                  Liked by 1 person

                • wolfmoon1776 says:

                  YW. 😀

                  And very much agreed. Trump was on top of his correct and WH-winning political stance decades ago. He has done nothing but fine-tune it for a more powerful win. Do the math.

                  Like

      • usayes says:

        You’ve seen her before… https://youtu.be/X44oVPg7yi8

        Liked by 1 person

    • vexedmi says:

      It would seem as though Ms. Farkus has received a phone call or two.

      Liked by 2 people

  3. Watcher says:

    Jeh Johnson and Clapper were pushing the Russian cyber election agenda in October 2016.
    Jeh was wanting states to seek DHS help to secure their cyber defense.
    I don’t know how many states requested his help. Interesting.
    Jeh seems to not be mentioned much, but he was a major zero but boy.

    https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/215-press-releases-2016/1423-joint-dhs-odni-election-security-statement

    Liked by 5 people

    • EternalVigilanc3 says:

      Watcher, interesting you mention this. Considerig 3 states had hacks into their systems originating from the dept that jeh wanted states to have help them. Though that agency denies the hacking. that dept later said those states requeasted a hack to shore up their systems. Georgia is still pissed about it. And its been swept under the rug…

      Liked by 4 people

    • wolfmoon1776 says:

      Oh, these guys are SO not mentioning all the now-obvious set-up they did to pull a fast one on Trump, and it is remarkably centering on these turds. It’s just sick, once you can see the wires. In fact, the highly unqualified Red Diaper Jeh is one of the biggest reasons we now know the extent of the plot, and that it almost certainly involves false attributions of Russian espionage getting Trump elected.

      Which, to be honest, these people should swing for, but I digress.

      Timelines. Sundance is right. Timelines.

      Go back in time and WATCH the Obama IC (particularly DHS), the slightly out-of-sync media, and the far-too-smug Obama White House doing various flip-flops on the hackability or not of the electoral system, AS NEEDED, to pull of their little scam.

      Once you see that, it’s very clear that when they needed to question the integrity of state systems, the media set it up for a “doubtful” IC to then investigate. When they needed to back out and give “temporary” assurances of integrity – to cover their own criminal tracks – they did that. And then they did a little, very clever hemming and hawing about the systems for months, and they would have likely KEPT doing that, until they were ready to fully delegitimize Trump’s victory with their own (shocked face) ERMAHGERD – RUSSIANS “discoveries” of Russian tampering that THEY THEMSELVES DID.

      Oh, this will be a spaghetti mess to put together, as they back out and close down their boiler-room ops, because these people were using all sorts of deniable contractors to do everything. ANOTHER lesson of Montgomery, Snowden, and stonetear. And – OH – almost forgot to mention them…..

      GOOGLESTRIKE.

      When this is done, there isn’t going to be anybody in their right mind who will EVER use electronic tabulation that isn’t duplicated and checked against physical ballots 365 ways from Sunday. Once you know what these people who S*** ON DEMOCRACY actually did, or hoped to do, you realize – yeah – we will restore faith in our electoral systems – and it WON’T be by having the evil swamp acting like it has been acting, by putting CORRUPT GARBAGEMEN LAWYER SHILLS like Jeh Johnson in charge of anything, and it won’t be by trusting any kind of tamperable system within 1000 miles of the duplicitous Deep State.

      Liked by 6 people

      • wolfmoon1776 says:

        PS – Ms. Farkas: Do you see the severity of the situation in which you find yourself now?

        If I was you, I would find a lawyer who absolutely despises and distrusts the Clintons, or anybody who has anything to do with them. The more paranoid, the better, too, because the Clintons have certain quiet friends who are very good hackers, who don’t get much mention lately.

        What you know can get you killed, but it can also keep you alive. Time to start doing your due diligence.

        Liked by 2 people

      • wolfmoon1776 says:

        PPS – True The Vote.

        The corrupt Obama DOJ HAD to know their capabilities, and if they were onto things. OMG – it all makes sense now. It was about WAY more than just pesky little vote fraud by penny-ante precinct princesses. The minuscule fight over civil rights stuff was just cover. It was – “Do they have any idea about Montgomery? Were they ever looking at any of the stronger allegations of Deep State tampering?”

        WOW. And that’s why THEY were a separate and early priority from everybody else.

        Like

      • wolfmoon1776 says:

        This is key evidence of what is going on. But in light of #Vault7, we need to step back and ask ourselves what this really is, and what is the psychological purpose of stuff that gets caught multiple times, especially when done under the guise of “helping” to test security.

        I would say “they” (but not DHS) did hack more. Most likely rogue operations contracted by the CIA, using #Vault7 tech. But what THIS is (visible DHS hacks that were easily caught by non-federal-level, commercial forensics), is OBVIOUS chaff being thrown to misdirect.

        This is the magician waving with his right hand, with much flourish, toward his busty, beautiful assistant, who raises her arms and cants one very hot leg forward at the same time, while the magician’s left hand flips a card into a device under the flowing long sleeve, and NOT ONE PERSON in an audience of thousands sees it.

        The REAL hacks – toward key states needed for Hillary to win – and probably the ONE state with the weakest or most Democrat-compromised system – will not be found except under the most diligent, post-scandal scrutiny. Probably long after somebody outs the full extent of things, and people know exactly where to look.

        Goal 1 – get far enough in to leave planted evidence that Trump won illegitimately, to try to take power in 2020.

        Goal 2 – if possible, get far enough to change results and take power in 2016.

        Our goal – find the real evidence and get the powerful confessions that keep these anti-American scumbags out of office until 2032 or later.

        Like

  4. Brant says:

    One of the fascinating things about all of this since January 20 (since POTUS 45 got to 1600 Penn Ave) is that we are really getting to witness the intrigue that has been happening for years, if not decades. Yes, they would sometimes feed us bits and pieces to keep us content, but all of this is not in their playbook. So much so quickly is not their game plan. Trump’s tweets are him opening doors and windows for us all to see what’s going on inside. The Farkas Fracus is the start (hopefully) of the inside folks getting so agitated they start to slip up and talk way off script. Their entire safe space full of navel gazers is getting invaded and their responses are predictable and wonderful to observe.

    Liked by 13 people

  5. CJ says:

    On Saturday, the [Russian Foreign] ministry posted the following audio file of the “new” automated telephone switchboard message for Russian embassies.

    “You have reached the Russian embassy, your call is very important to us. To arrange a call from a Russian diplomat to your political opponent, press 1. To use the services of Russian hackers press 2. To request election interference, press 3 and wait until the next election campaign. Please note that all calls are recorded for quality improvement and training purposes.”

    Liked by 5 people

  6. Paul Killinger says:

    The only part of this that rings true is by her own admission, her Hill People need more intelligence. That’s undeniable!

    Liked by 4 people

  7. Buck Turgidson says:

    “….get sweeped up….. “when people like me are speaking on behalf of process….” Friends that is just the first 20 seconds. This dumbass would not get pass the entry interview for a junior assistant project assistant where I’m the boss. Listen to her English and ‘syntax’ (any English majors can straighten me out that if necessary). This woman’s brain and speech are garbled and addled. Something isn’t right. did she take too many drugs, or something. B/c she sounds like a dyslexic drunk. I think she’s just a low-IQ left-wing shallow incompetent dumbass who should be stocking shelves at Dollar General. Like a very unfunny Foster Brooks (who IMO is one of the funniest guys ever).

    Liked by 4 people

    • vexedmi says:

      Having someone whisper in your ear that ‘your end is in sight’ my give one that garbled speech to which you refer.
      Agree with “the funniest guy ever”. The Brooks routine with Dean Martin is a classic.

      Like

      • Buck Turgidson says:

        That is how she is behaving — like someone who is busted beyond belief, and is terrified and wondering if she is going to get rubbed out. Her world got turned upside down and her brain has completely short circuited. She was stupid to begin with — i mean, she is a democrat liberal SJW — and now she realizes she is way, way, way over her head. She is dealing with the obozos, jarrett, and the clintons, and those people of course do not bat an eye about arranging for ‘an accident.’ Woops lookie there ms fargas’ car just blew up. Woops ms fargas just slipped and fell off the platform in front of that train. Woops ms fargas just suicided herself. Oh well, accidents happen, just a coincidence that she was spilling the beans on obozo and clinton criminal activities. Nothing to see here folks, move along. She is terrified and her heroes obozo and hilLIARy aren’t coming over the hill to bail her out, but rather might be looking to rub her out. oh those democrat/communists are such nice people!

        Like

        • UKExpat says:

          LIBTARDS continually demonstrate that they have no BRAIN and no SHAME and absolutely no concept of what HYPOCRISY could possibly mean they do not THINK they merely EMOTE and often STUPIDLY, CRIMINALLY and VIOLENTLY.

          Like

    • Jenny R. says:

      She’s adding extra words to her sentence structure…this is usually the sign of somebody who is attempting to dissemble, and it often slips them up as their brains are having a problem keeping up to that task. Even notable dissemblers like Bill C. had moments where this happened, and Evelyn Farkas is not as accomplished.

      Like

    • zephyrbreeze says:

      I thought she’s Ukranian and English is her second language maybe? I could be wrong.

      Like

  8. Mika is a classic example of a spoiled mean girl b*tch. Just like Meghan McCain, she wouldn’t have a career if her dad wasn’t who he was.

    They just like Hillary have great contempt for us.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. ronheinzkaboot says:

    The scary thing is that if HRC won, it would be these incompetent weirdos that would be making policy and running our government. Farkas, Mook, Palmeri, Podestra, etc.
    Really look at each one’s resume, accomplishments and their colossal failures during her campaign and afterwards. Most importantly their continued bald face lying about this Russia narrative and their ability to use the “free” press to smear people and misinform the public.

    There is not a day that goes by that I don’t think about the miracle of Trump actually winning.
    How I was resigned to the misery that was going to be our lives when HRC was coroneted.
    With all this horrible things her staff is doing–to the part of starting a war with Russia to help her and her patron Putin–I am so glad that Trump won and I still have hope.

    Liked by 2 people

  10. Gerry says:

    A few questions for anyone wth knowledge on the PDB with regards to how it works with respect to historical access:
    1. Is the historical access of the PDB during Obama’s tenure the Holy Grail to expose the truth on Fast and Furious, Benghazi/Operation Zero Footprint and Russian Hacking ?

    2. How difficult is it to go back? Can it be accessed by dates in time?

    3. An DJT authorize this access?

    If DJT could , why would Obama risk doing this knowing he could get caught?

    Also, and this could really blow the lid off on this scandal, what if the surveillance included information on Bernie Sander’s campaign as well as surveillance on the surveillance watchers- I.e. Intel committee as Wells’s the Gang of 8.

    Like

  11. joe says:

    Might be time to re-open the case of Seth Rich. Reportedly murdered in a robbery where the “thugs” left behind his wallet, cell phone and watch. He was a DNC IT guy, Sanders supporter, very upset about something, Assange said he was source of DNC emails.

    Like

  12. cali says:

    Every day is a new discovery and everyday is another lie to top off the one of the prior day. They have lost control of the carefully planned strategy framing DT and his team. When that happens all bets are off because having lost the grip on the information flow enters into dangerous territory.
    The white hats pushing back via WIKILEAKS and Julian Assange named VAULT 7. As he stated so far they only released less than 1% of the 600,000 docs and if we know anything we do have an inkling how Assange operates. His releases continue to built and built while he always saves the best for last. That keeps the deep state off balance causing one misstep after another and as we can see they have become very sloppy ergo Fargas now claiming it was taking out of context as reported at the Spectator.
    I read a transcript a couple of days ago at millenniumreport.com where a spokeswoman from the Putin government stated “if the disinformation and lies in the US about election hacking etc continues we may expose and publish information about secrets involving Obama he begged us to keep said secrets’. I suppose that should be sufficient to stop once and for all the disinformation and lies beginning with the ‘election hacking’.
    I do pray that the deep state and its panic does not think about another set-up false flag to distract from their actual their true agenda in hope to get out of this invented jam. There is only so much they can invent until it reaches dangerous levels of absurdity. Don’t ever put anything beyond them. We are not dealing with individuals that are like us and no – integrity is a foreign subject and word to them. It is about greed, lust for power and control.
    When George Bush was asked by a local reporter what he thought about DT and taking his oath his reply was “that was some weird sh$t”. Strange but not surprising.
    I’m sure Hillary in her red outfits appearing anywhere anytime is also no co-incidence unless she is campaigning for 2020? Then there is her daughter inserting herself so frequently via Twitter although her responses are more often than not plain dumb.
    In the meantime Michelle Obama disappeared while Malia is out of control creating scenes in clubs 21 and over while Obama is far away on an extended vacation – single – being pampered in his $10,000.00 per night luxury spa supposedly writing a book. The last time he did that was when he went to Bali supposedly writing the book ‘Dreams of my Father’ which we now know was written by Bill Ayers.

    Like

    • Virgo says:

      On the subject of strange syntax and dissembling, his so-called life was called “dreams FROM my father”. Anyone know what that nuance means? Are they dreams he didn’t really take from his father? Who is he referring to? His father or someone who knew who his father was. Definitely, hearing a second-hand feeling here.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s