Why Is Iran’s Version of “The Deal” So Different From Obama/Kerry’s Version?

If you are unfamiliar with the fraud that was the UAC Humanitarian Crisis of 2014, what we outline here might not make sense.  However, for those who do understand that prior fraud there are similarities to point toward.

The New York Post outlines “The Deal” with Iran, or more appropriately stated “the outline”; and points out the stark differences between what President Obama and Secretary Kerry are claiming against the claims of Iran.

Obamakerry iran

Both can be reconciled if you accept the historical reality that everything the Obama administration does and says has to first pass through a domestic political prism.

Passing through that prism, the truth and reality separate.   As Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber honestly admitted, ‘the truth becomes what they say it is’.

After looking at the totality of events that flowed since August of 2014 when New York Times author Thomas Friedman interviewed President Obama:

[…]  On Iran, the president said the chance that American efforts to strike a deal on nuclear weapons is “a little less than 50-50,” in part because some Islamic leaders may fear such a pact would loosen their grip on power.

“That may prevent us from getting a deal done,” Mr. Obama said. “It is there to be had. Whether ultimately Iran can seize that opportunity — we will have to wait and see, but it is not for lack of trying on our part.”  (full article link)

From that moment forward the entire construct of “a deal with Iran” took on a shift.  The administration focused on talking about “compliance” efforts, the Iranian’s focused on talking about “the removal of sanctions”, and internally to their own domestic audience, toward “maintaining their program”.

Kerry and Marashi - Iran negotiations

Team Obama/Kerry seemingly focused exclusively on the aspect of verification and compliance; giving up on any hope of removing the Iranian “ability”.

We’ve noted that almost every aspect of the Obama “talking points” (for lack of a better description) have focused on deflecting criticism by using a narrative claiming inspectors can verify non weapon-centered nuclear capability.

The second thing noted is that the “deal” itself is a seemingly disingenuous squirrel distraction.  The deal itself is “what they say it is”.

There is, in actuality, no deal.

Allow me to repeat….  There is no deal per se’; it’s a total fabrication, a ruse, a series of points for discussion in the media that doesn’t factually exist.

Just like the 2014 Unaccompanied Alien Children humanitarian crisis of 2014 that also didn’t factually exist.   The “UAC Crisis” was, similarly, just an assembled series of talking points to gather support toward a larger goal of immigration conversation.

The Iran Outline is a conversational point for the progressive left on Iran in the same manner as the UAC Outline was a conversational point for the progressive left on immigration.  There isn’t any actual ‘there’ there.

How did “actual talks” end up being just “political talking points”?

The answer is: (the always used) Political Prism.

An actual deal was fraught with too much consequential, and uncontrollable, controversy – which was finding even more unwelcome pushback from Democrats who also recognized the possibility of Iran actually having a nuclear program was far too toxic a consequence for them to hold ownership of.

Iran with Nukes would always been an outcome of Democrats.  Period.  There is no comfortably deniable distance inside that reality, and no spin which would turn the blame toward Republicans.

As a direct consequence last week:

White House situation room - Iran negotiations

♦ The White House Team constructed their escape plan, their political “talking points” on 3/31/15 (photo above).  [Note following this meeting not a single media interview by the State Department team]

♦ Those White House points (released to the public on April 2nd) are exclusively based on domestic political needs and influenced by increasing domestic backlash.  The White House needed, at least in appearance, to get back to the right side of history.  However, they also need to save face and make it appear as something it’s not.

♦ Their goal was to A.) create something: Historic, Magnificent, Amazing, etc. Worthy of another Peace Prize – this time for John Kerry; and, B.) Gain a deniable angle for any adverse impact as a consequence of Iran and Nuclear Capability.

♦ The State Dept. Team in Switzerland (Kerry et al) told to keep quiet as the White House talking points are constructed/finalized. (link) 4/1 and 4/2 absolute silence.

♦ An outline is then reached by the Secretary of State team with the Iranian team which does not align with the White House construct (talking points).

♦  The actual deal content doesn’t really need to line up with the talking points because A.) that’s not the most important aspect – Think “Tax” VS. “Mandate” in ObamaCare; and B.) they don’t really care- it’s a ruse.

♦ The White House talking points are used by President Obama in the Rose Garden. (link)  Note these Talking Points” are NOT a “joint” statement as would normally be evident in an agreement between two nations.  These are a pure construct of the White House.

♦ The Iranian team then points out those talking points don’t align in fact with the deal reached by the negotiation teams. Subsequently calls them “LIES” (link)

Politically the White House now has options:

Option #1. Gruber the electorate (requires an acquiescing media). Meaning, sell an evident fraud as something it is not (ie. Obamacare strategy).  This would be tough to do with Congress – but if the White House can leverage total political (ie. Democrat) compliance, it’s possible.

Option #2. Claim the Iranians have changed approach. Blame them and quash the deal before June of 2015; positioning themselves to appear strong, and hiding the fraud that was not really a deal in the first place.

Here’s the article previously mentioned.   You decide.

Obama - Kaboom(Via New York Post) “Iran Agrees to Detailed Nuclear Outline,” The New York Times headline claimed on Friday. That found an echo in the Washington Post headline of the same day: “Iran agrees to nuclear restrictions in framework deal with world powers.”

But the first thing to know about the highly hyped “historic achievement” that President Obama is trying to sell is that there has been no agreement on any of the fundamental issues that led to international concern about Iran’s secret nuclear activities and led to six mandatory resolutions by the United Nations Security Council and 13 years of diplomatic seesaw.

All we have is a number of contradictory statements by various participants in the latest round of talks in Switzerland, which together amount to a diplomatic dog’s dinner.

First, we have a joint statement in English in 291 words by Iranian Foreign Minister Muhammad Javad Zarif and the European Union foreign policy point-woman Federica Mogherini, who led the so-called P5+1 group of nations including the US in the negotiations.

John Kerry and his team watch from Lausanne, Switzerland as President Obama makes his state address on the status of the Iran nuclear program talks on April 2nd.

Next we have the official Iranian text, in Persian, which runs into 512 words. The text put out by the French comes with 231 words. The prize for “spinner-in-chief” goes to US Secretary of State John Kerry who has put out a text in 1,318 words and acts as if we have a done deal.

It is not only in their length that the texts differ.

They amount to different, at times starkly contradictory, narratives. (read more)

This entry was posted in Big Stupid Government, Conspiracy ?, History, Iran, Islam, Israel, Notorious Liars, Obama Research/Discovery, Occupy Type Moonbats, Professional Idiots, propaganda, Secretary of State, Typical Prog Behavior, Uncategorized, United Nations, Valerie Jarrett, White House Coverup. Bookmark the permalink.

30 Responses to Why Is Iran’s Version of “The Deal” So Different From Obama/Kerry’s Version?

  1. freepetta says:

    Here is the rule of thumb: If 0bama’s lips are moving he’s lying. His administration will tow the line as best as they can. Nothing is ever his fault. 0bama will throw whomever he pleases under a bus, because that’s the kind of guy he is.


  2. bofh says:

    John F’in Kerry – dark horse Dem presidential candidate for 2016?


  3. Michael Dixon says:

    One enters into a deal to gain a benefit. (If there’s no benefit, why bother to deal?) Absent coercion by one side or the other, both sides make concessions to reach a deal. As an American citizen who pays federal income taxes, I’d like to know: What deal was made? What concessions were made by my paid representatives? What benefits did I receive? How am I better off today than I was before the deal?


    Liked by 1 person

  4. I’ve got to say, I read the headline and my knee-jerk answer to the question of why the versions were different was “Iran is the only one telling the truth?” I actually assumed the President of the United States was being deceitful and the taqquiya specialists were being honest.

    Any time the world would like to go back to normal, that would be fine by me..this is insane…


  5. moogey says:

    Why does Iran have sanctions? Because they lied and failed to fulfill previous agreements, they support and lead terrorism around the world, and they kill and imprison any who the Supreme Religious Leaders choose. This regime desires the extermination of a population.

    Iran is now is Northern Africa, Yemen & Iraq to name a few, and tightening sanctions would be a strategic move.. However, Obama is providing Iran with time, eased restrictions and immunity while the “nuclear” talks take place. The process is Obama’s passive aggressive tactic towards strengthening Iran’s economy, influence & military in a broader area.

    Hillary decided that Gaddafi was planning the extermination of a portion of the population in his country and she was allowed to manipulate his murder. Iran plans & expands, in order to kill & exterminate every Jew in the world. And Obama goes to the rose garden.

    Where are our Senators?


    • Dixie says:

      Damn good question. But when I read that Obama planned to call certain members of Congress because they need to know, I thought to myself…..well now he’s gonna pull the wool over their eyes and smooze them so they will agree with everything he says and convince other members of Congress to do the same. So, once again, Congress will do NOTHING.

      You people here at CTH have more sense in a New York minute than Congress does ALL. DAY. LONG.

      Liked by 3 people

  6. Why? Because obama/kerry are trying to claim the victory that the Ayatollah got.


  7. triper57 says:

    You really wonder why the two versions are so different? Nothing was written down so they both can claim a victory.


    • RJ says:

      I think you got to that fork in the road taking the right highway of truth! This is getting so old, all these lies and deceptions, that I am beginning to “wash my hands” of all these politicians no matter what party they affiliate.

      We need a new “rhetoric” as a country, a perspective that looks to respect our American citizens while communicating to non-Americans directly about those values which have made America free, dynamic, and an economic powerhouse, suggesting to these foreign others that if they pull themselves “up by their bootstraps” they too can enrich their lives any way they choose. We are the model from which they can copy, modify, and expand to reach their goals.

      Tell the truths that have made America what it is, plain and simple. Remove these liars and deceivers from our national conversation where ever we may find them.

      Or, keep running toward those cliffs…got wings?


      • doodahdaze says:

        IMO we are pretty much done for already. It will only get worse from here. Seems like we are past the point of no return.


  8. Michael Dixon says:

    Who has a sense of betterment today because of this so-called deal? Who believes the world is now “safer for democracy?” Who is breathing a sigh of relief?

    The gathering of the esteemed deal makers in Switzerland is grand political theater. Participants stay in the finest hotels, eat the finest food, fly in luxurious jet planes, all expenses paid, Aides scurry about with prepared statements for the bigwigs to advance the dialogue.

    In all of the countries of the world with nuclear weapons, there must be 10,000 times enough to annihilate the human population of the earth. But thank goodness we have a “deal” with Iran not to develop a nuclear weapon of their own. What a travesty.


  9. rashomon says:

    I want to know why Komodo-tongued Kerry didn’t negotiate the release of Marine Amir Hekmati, who has been a prisoner of war since 2011 and is still awaiting trial for being a CIA spy; Washington Post correspondent Jason Rezaian, held since July 2014; Christian pastor Saeed Abedini; and Robert Levinson, a retired FBI agent who disappeared in Iran over eight years ago. We could trade them for Michelle and Barry.


  10. John Galt says:


    The Communist Takeover Of America – 45 Declared Goals

    Obozo seems to closely follow the template.


  11. whodoneit says:

    Let’s see – hum – because Obama and Kerry are both lying sons of bitches?


  12. manickernel says:

    “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”


  13. czarowniczy says:

    Maybe Kerry misunderstood when the POtuS asked him to go out and Kraft an agreement…
    (b) just can’t get their lies straight?


    • smiley says:

      “He catches the wise in their craftiness, and the schemes of the wily are swept away.”
      Job 5:13

      be afraid Krafty Ketchup.
      be very afraid,


      • czarowniczy says:

        This guy’s gotta Teton Dam full of karma just waitin’ to slip his way


        • smiley says:

          the harder they come, the harder they fall.
          everything they do is venal.
          how they are getting away with it all, for this long, is what amazes me.
          and it just keeps getting worse, more brazen.


          • czarowniczy says:

            It’s the nature of the professional pol. People won’t invite a skunk into their homes yet they’ll gladly place their and their families fates into the hands of some slick huckster they’re too lazy/preoccupied to check out. Most people take more time researching a restaurant than they do the people they eagerly hand over their lives to. I still would like to see ‘public stoning unto death’ by the electorate as the punishment for wayward pols.


  14. Nanny G says:

    There is the added complication (beyond all the lying on both sides) of the fact that all these talks took place through interpreters.
    Who knows if the farsi or arabic translation was accurate at every sentence?
    Do WE have linguistic experts guaranteeing each word is accurately understood?
    Does their side?
    I bet, knowing how lax Obama has about working, that we did NOT have our own linguist who could tell Kerry to try again or that his words were not translated as he intended.
    Most Muslims claim their koran cannot even be comprehended in any language other than arabic.
    (OK, well, poppycock!)
    Point is, how much do the Iranians care about accuracy into English?


  15. cali says:

    This is the best summary of this farce negotiations ever by sundance!


  16. Pingback: new iran deal | Time for Thorns

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s