~ Black Lies Matter ~
Anyone else noticing how determined the black grievance industry is to manufacture some political benefit out of their own created crisis? The professional BGI generally always push the divisive racial angle; however, even for them the sheer scope of the hate-filled antagonism is infinitely larger than all prior efforts?
WASHINGTON DC – Members of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) are talking about inviting the families of Eric Garner and Michael Brown to President Obama’s State of the Union address in Washington next month.
The lawmakers, who have universally condemned the justice system’s response to the killings of the two black men at the hands of white police officers, say the presence of the two men’s relatives would send a strong signal that Washington policymakers are serious about tackling criminal justice reform head on.
“I think that would be appropriate and fitting,” Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.), a civil rights icon, said Thursday. “It would help educate and sensitize other members and humanize some of the issues that we’re going to confront.” (read more)
We’re not the type to hold Alex Jones level conspiracy theories, but there’s something about the scope, and more importantly ‘the context’ of the animus, framing the hate, that is more than convenient happenstance.
When you consider the Podesta, McDonough, Jarrett level forethought that’s gone into prior schemes around the IRS targeting, EPA mandates, healthcare deconstruction, and the absolute fraud that was the summer immigration crisis; and then you combine the politics of the people where this stuff is originating – it certainly lends to a trail of identifiable footprints.
Was the release of the Eric Garner decision ‘timed’? Was Loretta Lynch assigned the federal investigation therein to cover that manufacture? Is there actually a timeline of sequential, and methodical strategy?
If you follow this line of thought to it’s natural conclusion, where you end up is the careful creation of a shield to be used later.
The current “crisis de jour” is the forging and hardening of the shield. But to what end?
Here’s my hypothesis – With a Republican Majority in both the House and Senate, and focusing specifically, very specifically, on spending (treasury) and budgetary issues, you can be absolutely guaranteed there are going to be volumes of congressional laws passed by the majority that run diametrically counter to the goals of the radical leftists’ in the executive branch.
Forget policy difference for a moment. All that really matters, when you peel the skin of the onion, is money. Without money – the ideological usurpations cannot support themselves.
That said, I honestly have come to believe for the next two years the bills, the passed laws, the spending bills, will end up on President Obama’s desk. He will then just simply stack them in a corner and ignore them. As if they never existed in the first place.
Think about it. There’s no constitutional process to force the President to sign or veto a bill – any bill. He can just ignore the delivery and carry on. Who’s going force his hand. And if such pressure ever took place, even slightly,…..
…. well now he’s got a pretty impenetrable shield forged doesn’t he?
I’m not saying President Stompy Feet is smart enough to create this strategy or pull this off on his own. Quite the opposite, he’s nowhere near smart enough to figure this out – he just reads the Frankfurt School typescript.
But I am saying I can hear his 2015 and 2016 public scribes already.
You don’t have to deal with this:
When you can just ignore it.