Democrats are using racial ads intended to stoke racial strife with images of Ferguson and Trayvon Martin
But not all Democrats are happy with the transparent tactic.
All of the evidence in the Mike Brown shooting case was/is directly copied and transferred to the DOJ since the DOJ opened an official inquiry three days after the shooting on August 11th 2014.
According to both CNN and The New York Times, the leaks to their outlets have come from inside the federal Department of Justice. Also, Chris King, an editor for a black audience newspaper in Saint Louis admitted the contact source, willing to leak him information, was a federal official.
History Repeats – One of the lessons learned following the 2012 Trayvon Martin shooting, which created the George Zimmerman case, was to do a better job tracking the up-stream leadership for their motives and agenda.
We learned from that experience and began cataloging the up-stream leadership discussions on the dates they took place.
We began saving screen shots, articles, tweets, and media reports showing discussions between President Obama and Eric Holder. While they don’t hold value at the moment they are captured, those captures hold value in reflection (once the information is released).
With the factual evidence released we are able to look back in the discussions and identify when DC officials knew the details contained in the information. That allows us to identify the reality of what they knew, and, more importantly, what they did with ‘what they knew’.
Consider this meeting held on 8/18/14 against the recent release of the Mike Brown autopsy, and you can identify with certainty President Obama and DOJ head General Eric Holder knew the content of the forensic and toxicology results.
When President Obama met with Eric Holder (during the weekend respite of his Martha’s Vineyard vacation) it was 9 days after the shooting and a week after the DOJ had arrived in Saint Louis.
The federal authority knew:
• The official statement of Officer Darren Wilson, written and two interviews; • the initial witness statements that both corroborated and questioned Officer Wilson; • the autopsy and toxicology report results which supported Officer Wilson; • and they knew the forensic analysis of the physical evidence which staged the scene of the shooting itself.
They knew all of this stuff on August 18th.
Nothing which has been released after that date is divergent from the information they held on August 18th, other than: • a conformational interview of Darren Wilson (recorded) with the FBI, • and the official witness statements as delivered to the Grand Jury.
Those are the only factual additions, albeit some of them made more official via Grand Jury transcript etc.
Later Officer Darren Wilson sat down with the Grand Jury for four hours and answered questions (without an attorney).
Including the Mike Brown funeral which was a week later (8/25/14).
Think about President Obama and Eric Holder watching the Scheme Team pontificate about the “family autopsy”, which was coincidentally printed in the New York Times 8/17/14 and press conference 8/18/14.
Think about that performance knowing that Obama and Holder had in their hands the official results from the Saint Louis autopsy on the same date.
Eric Holder knew the “Hands Up – Don’t Shoot” meme was false on the day the scheme team was selling it. Eric Holder and President Obama knew the “execution style” shot to the head was false, on the day the scheme team was selling it.
Obama/Holder knew about the TWO SHOTS in the car, the Mike Brown blood on Officer Wilson, the injuries to Wilson, the gunshot wound to Big Mike’s hand, and Obama/Holder knew of the eight African American corroborating witness statements which supported Officer Wilson.
They knew all of this on 8/18/14 as they watched the Scheme Team on TV.
Yet what did they do to stop Ferguson Missouri from burning, looting and chaos?
Now ask yourself…. “WHY” ?
What was the benefit to Obama by watching events spiral out of control – yet knowing there is no factual basis for the underlying anger and outrage?