We’ll keep repeating this because it takes a lot of effort to break through the lame stream media narrative AS THEY AVOID – AVOID – AVOID.   
President Obama, and by consequence his water-carrying cohorts, are on the wrong side of the majority of Americans on the border crisis.

This recent article in The Hill, highlights the disconnect and the problem for Democrats in general.    In 2011 President Obama stood on the banks of the Rio Grande and announced “the border is secure”.   He went on to shout opposite opinion in that regard, “they want a moat – alligators in the moat”, was silly.
In 2014 the unsecure border reality has become the “border crisis”, and is now haunting President Obama and his cohorts in ideology.   They are beginning to twitch, visibly.
A similar analogy would be to compare the controversial issue around the Islamic Mosque proposed for New York, at Ground Zero.   The media and Dems worked feverishly to portray opposition as “bigoted and nativist”.    But the reality was the majority of Americans opposed the entire premise.   Try as hard as they would, it remained a losing issue for the Dems, but they held on to it as long as they could; eventually conceding collapse under the sheer weight of opposition.   Quietly the issue disappeared.
So too is this claim that expecting the border to be secure -from infiltrators of any ideology- is a bigoted position.   It just won’t sell.   Americans of all persuasions can see the depth of stupid; and when we say ‘of all persuasions’ we mean regardless of political tendencies.
Only the severe left-wing of the Obama base is in support of the ‘open border’ concept, and what this border issue is bringing to light is two-fold:
One – the border is NOT secure.   Two – Obama has done nothing to secure the border.
These two visible realities loom large.    They also present political risk because they represent both apathy and sunlight.    Union members, men and women, blacks and non-blacks alike are opposed to the current fixes, actually non-fixes, and proposals.

If the border was secure in 2011 then why does Obama need $3.7 billion in 2014 ?

It might take the insufferable dolts within the GOP a little time to catch on (because they are infected with media driven Stockholm syndrome), but the majority of Americans are far ahead of them in direct, reasonable and factual opposition.
Only a very small segment of the electorate is in alignment with President Obama.   That means if the administration continues to over play a weak hand they will be up against the sheer will of the American people.   
You’ll see more and more Murietta groups;  you’ll see more and more Bundy Ranch-like opposition.   Just like the opposition to the Ground Zero Mosque, you’ll see it first, and eventually so too will the White House.
Opposing the unlawful illegal alien policies might be, and indeed could be, the central issue which will create mutually assured destruction for the White House and Democrat Party Leadership.
We’re already seeing the familiar frenzied pace pick up.   It’s only a matter of time….. cue the audio visual demonstration:

WASHINGTON DC – Some of the toughest Republican critics of President Obama’s handling of the crisis on the border voted for the legislation they now blame for the humanitarian crisis unfolding there, Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) argued during an interview on Sunday.
Gutierrez said despite suggestions from Republican lawmakers, the current crisis at the border was not a question of security or law enforcement.
“The border is secure! The fact is that these children are handing themselves over to the border patrol agents,” Gutierrez said.
Instead, he said, the crisis stemmed from a 2008 law that automatically entitles minors from non-contiguous countries to asylum hearings before they face deportations. The legislation was intended to address the issue of human trafficking.
The surge in minors has overwhelmed that judicial system, and the problem will persist unless lawmakers provide additional funding for judges and attorneys, Gutierrez said.
“You can keep throwing money and talk about enforcement, enforcement, enforcement, but you’ve got to put money also into your judicial system, and you’ve got to put money in a comprehensive program that deals with the issue,” he told CBS News.  (read more)