An interesting review of Philadelphia ballot uploading results indicates a pattern of manipulated results according to an independent researcher looking at raw data. The results are discussed within a video upload explaining how the data-sets were organized and manipulated in a series of timed events.
(WATCH HERE)
According to the analysis: “in this data, particular vote ratios are transferred between random sets of seized precincts throughout the day.”
“The Dominion System isolated a “Flip Set” from the expected vote count and the expected percentage. It then splices the Flip Set into multiple “ratio sets” and assigns them to precincts throughout the day. Once a particular “ratio set” receives the votes it needed, it releases that set, and then Dominion injects it into the city wide count.”
“To hide it’s trail, Dominion reassigns the same “ratio set” to different (random) precincts throughout the day, so that the same precinct doesn’t keep getting the exact same ratio (or the same set of precincts).”
“During a particular period of time while a precinct is selected, it gives Trumps an EXACT NUMBER of votes, it gives Biden a MINIMUM number of votes, and splits the small remainder to a third party or to Biden (via random assignment).” (link to video and raw data)
Dominion Software operates ballot counting in at least 28 States:
The leftists got in way too far over their heads and are sinking fast IMO. When I see the canary in the coal mine, AKA Dominion execs, panicking and jumping ship for the whole world to see…
The are probably talking to Hillary on where to get a good deal on hammers, so hopefully someone will have some information stashed somewhere. The good news is Internet never forgets.
Don’t forget bleach with a cloth…
Don’t forget the bleach.
We know the election was stolen. The media knows it and were participants. As well as the fake pollsters.
Funny we have not heard much, if any exit polls touting all the millions who voted for slo Joe and the ho. I only watch Newsmax, so maybe I have missed it.
Me neither. Exit polls were big in 2016. I suspect they are less susceptible to the “shy Trump voter” effect. Obviously, exit polls would have stopped in its tracks the illusion that Biden won this election.
Dominion wasn’t used in Philly?
They didn’t want exit polling this election. According to the latest Rassmussen poll of likely voters (post election), 30% of democrats think the election was stolen with 25% of them saying very likely. Those are probably the 25-30% democrats that the RNC reported were attending the Trump Rallies and ended up voting for the POTUS.
If there were any see People’s Pundit. I believe you can ask him questions. I do know that the exit polls were also wrong in 2016. Trump voters basically refused to tell a person standing in their face around people accusing them of being racists who they voted for.
–Or they just pushed fraud polls again thinking the ballot stuffing operation in Palm Beach that got outed was going to carry Hildebeast.
In the context (suffocating in its omnipresence in our daily lives) of the absolutely BLATANT lies by the Insane left and Also-Insane Globalist Elite, ever since Obama… in 2008, I think everybody needs to understand that those AWFUL (i.e., obviously wrong) polls were designed to be so — just blatant lies, no matter how cunningly, even insanely constructed. They didn’t need to have Trump voters refusing to engage (!)
Good point. I do remember though what was reported.
They claim Trump increased his share of vote of every single race, gender and demographic, except for white men, who they say he was -5 compared to 2016.
I think what that shows is white men (who are targeted and harassed as racist) have to be more secretive and shy about their vote for Trump.
Whereas, he was up with women, blacks, latinos, LGBT, Muslims, Asians.
He was up with every single demographic and gained more votes for reelection than any incumbent president in history. He gained more votes than Nixon in ’72, who won 49 states.
Trump won a landslide
Yeah I remember that now. And that’s bull because he kept the white male vote and increased everyone else. That was cover for cheating, Dominion switched Trump votes to Biden as people proved from the screen grabs of vote totals on cable.
Where is AG BARR and the FBI? The vote tabulation computers and servers should have been siezed by now and under guard. It is beyond outrageous that our Attorney General has turned a blind eye to the cheating as if election fraud is just “dirty politics” and part of an entitlement program for the Democrat Party!
Barr is a target to be arrested.
Agree. It’s so far beyond election fraud if the fbi/doj does nothing except puke out another report claiming “everything fine”.
Joe-Sidney has said she is disgusted with all of them.
I noticed that the purported algorithm assigns votes at random between Biden and a third-party candidate. In 2020, this would have been the Libertarian candidate, who received 3.27% of the popular vote according to Newsmax. In 2016, when some scuttlebutt suggests that the algorithm was in use, the Libertarian candidate received 3.28% of the vote. Between 1972, when the Libertarian Party first nominated a candidate, and 2012, Libertarian candidates received between 0.0% and 0.99% of the popular vote. Did the Libertarians pin their hope of getting 5% of the popular vote in 2020 on a fraudulent vote count in 2016 inflated by Dominion?
That would be kind of funny. Even the lowly 5% dream was based on an inflated mirage.
I would really love for this to bear out. But I thought the strangeness he was seeing might just be due to the way he was sorting the huge dataset. I believe he said he sorted the precinct report data by vote ratio, then by time. So in such a huge dataset, you’d be bound to see rows with similar ratios at similar times just because of the sorting. I’m not 100% sure I followed it accurately, so fingers crossed that I am totally wrong!
According to Bev Harris at Black Box Voting it’s all in the fractions (ratios). Her video explains what is happening IN the software: https://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-video/ . The analysis of the Pennsylvania numbers proves the analysis done by Harris.
Please continue to pray for the legal teams looking for the real evidence. The Dems are the party of doxing, deep fakes, etc. I remember the TikTok kids who bought all the Tulsa Trump rally tickets with no intention of attending, just to try and embarrass Trump with a half-full venue.
I’d imagine that Rudy, Sidney and all the rest are being overwhelmed with info and baited to spend precious time chasing ghosts and tracking down false information. Their investigators need wisdom to discern what is valuable and what is nonsense.
Sometimes I am wondering everybody’s looking for the “smoking gun”.
If we look at voting law every vote should have chain of custody. It is up to the election runners to be able to prove that this chain of custody is intact. If you ask them “show me the chain of custody on vote X” they should be able to show it to you.
All that information needs to be kept 22 months by federal statute.
If they can’t produce that chain, vote should be thrown out. Vote is compromised.
The burden of proof is on the states. They need to prove the votes are legit. And with the mail in ballots and relaxed rules / no signature verification = clear cut case. But then I am not a lawyer unless everyone is willfully blind and ignores the law.
In that case I hope the affected states can grow lots of Bananas because that will be all that you get take seriously of the republic.
You are absolutely correct regarding the ‘chain of custody.’ I want to see the paperwork for the drivers delivering ballots that arrived after 8 p.m. They should be able to provide who signed the authorization for the ballots being transferred to the driver of the vehicle and the receipt regarding who received them along with dates, times and quantities. Where were they picked up and from whom?
You are absolutely correct regarding the ‘chain of custody.’ I want to see the paperwork for the drivers delivering ballots that arrived after 8 p.m. They should be able to provide who signed the authorization for the ballots being transferred to the driver of the vehicle and the receipt regarding who received them along with dates, times and quantities. Where were they picked up and from whom?
“The burden of proof is on the states.”
Excellent point. In fact in the case of restoring voter confidence, THE ONLY POINT.
If we get audited on our taxes we must prove where we got our figures and substantiate our claims. Likewise, if the government cannot prove to us the election was fair and honest by proving chain of custody AND provide the honest reason for the improbable statistical totals and answering all the questions the legal time are asking; then they are not getting another dime from us. If they refuse to prove all that needs to be proven to we the people then they are an legitimate and have no standing before us to even ask for our money and I dare say they will have a revolution on their hands that even pacifists will join in on.
*2nd to last line should read “then they are ILLEGITIMATE and have no standing before us”
But how is it that we make them prove that? What if they simply refuse? Number one is paper ballot vs electronic tally which is already off in Michigan. Also, I would like to see a random set of “receipt” ballots run through an independent scanner to be sure that the QR code matches the names printed on the paper. Why isn’t this mandatory and part of every election verification procedure?
Yes so true. I woke up this morning 4am with the sudden and urgent need to pray and intercede especially for SIDNEY POWELL, she literally called them all out in public and with a threat of jail to boot. God showed me how Trump and all those speaking out for truth and justice are being protected by prayers of others and our prayers to our Heavenly Father. It’s not the magic of Trump, it’s the Hand of God and all of them are in danger without God’s Hand. Asking God to send big powerful warring angels to surround each one of them and each of us in this fight with evil. In the Name of the Father, the Son Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit. AMEN.
To the world: stand back and you will see God intercede on behalf of those that seek justice and truth because He hears the prayers of His people and those that love Him. God does NOT hear the prayers of the wicked whose only desire is to destroy us and President Trump is is standing in their way.
Aren’t you fascinated that the bubble people (dinosaur media shrinking liberal audience) has no idea what we’re learning about the world?
–How the voter fraud operation primarily originating in the big blue cities operates.
–If you talk to an ostrich head in the sand liberal, like I occasionally must, it’s very intriguing how they’re so crooked and stupid they refuse to look into their side’s crimes.
–We don’t shy away from learning about our side, and the unacceptable fact we have about 1% we can trust.
–The saying “How do you make a Conservative mad, lie to him, how do you make a Liberal mad? Tell him the truth” is a provable fact born out every time you talk to one.
The constitution has checks and balances.
Politicians, Police and Judges they create law, enforce law and interpret law separate from eachother.
“We the People” electing officials in the government is another check and balance.
If the machine starts electing itself, it is a loss of the checks and balances and it weakens the system to the point even of no recovery (ask the Romans what happened to their empire) The machine then no longer has accountability to We the people as the founding fathers envisioned. This can only turn out to be a big and bigger problem.
Democrats might be cheerful now (they believe its falling their way) but for people as a whole its short sighted and destructive. Anyone should cheer for a hones, fair and transparent system. Removing the checks & balances is weakening the system and it’s a loss for everyone that values living free.
When the “law” becomes unjust, rebellion becomes duty. It would appear we are nearing zero hour to do our duty.
* “The United States is also a one-party state but, with typical American extravagance, they have two of them.” (former Tanzanian PM/president Julius Nyerere)
If it is proven that the Dominion machines were used to manipulate votes, we are looking at a huge conspiracy to commit treason. Fraud will be the least of their worries. I am updating my resume so I can be the first to apply for the position of Hangman.
I suppose Hangperson would be PC…but I’m not PC.
It will be proven, but ignored and/or not believed.
The Ruling Class means to drive Trump from office and they will not allow “evidence” of their theft to deter them. It’s gonna take sterner measures to save our Republic.
I don’t think this is what we want to base our hopes on. None of this talk about moving ratios makes any sense. I think these are just coincidences of finding patterns in literally a million data entries. Nothing is being transferred. I have gone through the raw data looking at those time points and the precincts to which “ratios” were being transferred to were already at nearly those same ratios before. These
Furthermore what even is “transferring a ratio”? If the vote is being manipulated by computers, the only way to know will be to compare an independent count of the ballots in several precincts and then compare them to the computer reported counts. This should not be difficult assuming that the ballots have remained segregated by precinct. This may be optimistic for some counties, but should be possible where computer fraud is suspected in republican leaning counties.
I think much of the other statistical analysis is quite compelling, but this is not.
Its pattern analysis
If you have a normal election the ratios of trump vs biden voters over time would never be constant.
For example: you could say that each 5 mins 3 trump voters enter and 7 biden voters. For a total of 10 voters.
Now the next 5 minute window again 3 trump voters enter and 7 biden voters exactly.
Now the next 5 minute window again 3 trump voters enter and 7 biden voters.
Now over time this might average out to be a ratio but its suspect that the ratio remains relatively constant. You would expect a more natural distribution for example. 6 trump voters in 5 minutes 0 biden voters. And then the next 5 mins 0 trump voters and 14 biden voters.
The fact that the ratios are repetive is a statistical anomaly. It’s the same as flipping a coin 20 times and its all heads. What are the chances? It can happen but its unlikely.
So the ratio distribution, yes it can happen but its unlikely and can indicate manipulation.
Your last sentence is all watered down, and thus misdirecting. Variations in the ratio are, like every natural (not manipulated) process, Gaussian, or “normal” in distribution — the “bell curve”. If they don’t obey the simple statistics of the “normal” distribution (so-called, remember, because it is UNIVERSAL in the natural world), then they have been manipulated. By TREASON. There is no “unlikely” or “can indicate”. It’s treason, period…and in an overwhelming context of continuous, suppressive treason for the last 12 years…by the SAME people, whom I have recognized and called out, for all of those years, as “The Insane Left”.
And I voted Democrat for President from 1976 through 2004. They crossed the line, irrevocably and forever, in 2008. Destroy them, for they embrace only Lies now. Period.
Just to stick with probability theory area I agree it can be perceived as watered down, but its just working.
If you testify in court as a statistician that it could never happen though it would probably be stricken down by the defense. You’d have to say the chances are so infintisimally small its as good as impossible.
Do not get me wrong the chance of somehting happening could be a million zeroes 0.00000…..1% which would practically all but mean it can never happen. So I agree with your statement.
It’s just one such statistical analysis. There are many. Each one is a part of the big picture.
From what I’ve read, in many places, contrary to law, the original ballots were destroyed.
Regarding chain of custody, ours is long and varied and so wide open to fraud. Dr. Shiva, whose video on vote abnormalities was posted at CTH, recommends direct tabulation, maintenance, and reporting of votes at the precinct level. For honest brokers that would be a simple thing to do in this day and age, but given the apparent corruption in both parties, it’s not likely to happen, especially if Biden is installed.
At that point, the country needs to physically split in two to reflect the massive philosophical split that already exists.
All documents related to the vote and chain of custody must be maintained for 22 months.
*ALL* documents. For example, should the ballot be digitized / scanned then both the scanned ballot and the original must be kept for 22 months.
Federal law is quite clear on this.
If they threw out the original that in itself is election fraud and reason to throw out the state election. There’s really no but’s and if’s there.
If the state can’t show all documents as required, then *the State* is disinfranchising voters because they did not respect federal law. Not the person filing the lawsuit to throw the ballot out undocumented ballot.
It’s quite a weird look on the world: If you ask to see the evidence the vote is legit the accusation is the person asking for that evidence (that the State should have and kept!) that is disinfranchising. Think about that mind warp.
At this point we just need people to start following and enforcing the existing law that is in place. And not make up new interpretations and new laws or changing the rules as we go.
Also think about this: If I ran a business I should keep my records for what. 5 year? 7 years?
Now if I run an election that is not important, it only elects the people who are going to define policy and run the country for years. No big deal *sarcasm*
Why do we have more rules for running a business than for electing the people who run the country and manage the country finances? ISO compliance, SOC compliance, millions of business standards.
But some states appear to can not run a simple tally of votes. Think about that.
Ever hear of ranked choice voting? Take a look at https://ballotpedia.org/Ranked-choice_voting_(RCV) and tell me if this looks like some of the data how it changes.
Could it be that Dominion built in the capability and someone has used the feature either for corruption or out of sheer incompetence?
Twitter/Newmax is reporting they got the servers from Germany. I think with those, they can then identify the algorithm or algorithms in the software.
They could have gotten that literally from the Dominion software Manual though because weighted race feature etc. is literally documented in the manual along with other features to modify votes.
If you look at the outputs of the voting system you can tell there was some kind of vote manipulation. An algorithm was active as the votes were not just tallied but “processed” (resulting in fractional votes and what not) Whether it was 1 algorithm or 10 algorithms in sequence or a monkey with an abacus window. It doesnt really matter at that point I think, as if its not “1 person = 1 vote”, the system is fraudulent. The constitution says 1 citizen casts 1 vote.
The servers could provide more insight in who was operating and coordinating and where the commands came from.
The question is who “they” is. If it is Deep State military it will not be released to Trump lawyers. If it were to patriots I think Sydney would have seen it b y now.
I said this in another comment way upthread, but I want to stick it here too to make sure it’s seen. If I’m wrong, please someone tell me. But I think this MAY be a big deal.
While the “ratio transfer” issue is strange, and probably very significant, there’s something MUCH more obvious going on, that is much easier to understand.
I just went back and watched the video again. ONLY focused on the Trump:Total ratio. And every one I saw, every single one, was a PERFECT WHOLE NUMBER. Biden’s might be a ratio you’d expect, some odd number, but NOT Trump’s. For instance if Trump got 53 votes, whatever number the Total votes there were, you’d expect that dividing one into the other would usually give you some remainder, right? WRONG.
When Trump got 53 votes, it was from a Total of 265… when divided, exactly 5.
Trump got 7, the Total was 336… exactly 48.
Trump got 9, the Total was 144… exactly 16.
Trump got 57, the Total was 342… exactly 6.
These are just a few example I found from quickly scanning through, there are countless more.
How is this not a “smoking gun”?!
I went back and looked some more, all I’m able to do is watch as he’s quickly scrolling through the spreadsheet, of course. Anyway, while the majority of ratios ARE whole numbers as I mentioned, I now see some that aren’t. The vast majority of those are when Trump’s % of the vote is higher… from 35% to a little over 50%. But again, when his % is low, the vast majority end up as whole numbers. Not sure what’s causing that, but it sure don’t look natural and random to me.
It absolutely is a smoking gun. That’s completely impossible without manipulation.
Oops! Didn’t see your second post. Didn’t refresh from last night! Now that would take spending some time with the data, but it still could be a convincer. If the whole number divisor was happening impossibly often during the time periods that other mathematical anomalies were then it WOULD prove manipulation and pinpoint the frequency, duration, and extent. It would possibly be a “marker” making it easy to bypass periods when no manipulation was happening and focus on the relevant illegal periods of voter data corruption.
Again, the problem with this is it is NYT (Edison Research) data. Not actual state data.
I don’t know how you found this data analysis CTH. I thought, “I can’t listen to this, look at the hour.” I will have a hangover tomorrow but it was WORTH hanging in there to watch and listen to it all. Its not from the Truly’s I drank tonight but from the theorem put forth here that I have a real pain in my heart center – my solar plexus. Dominion is EVIL INCARNATE. They insult the intelligence of so many humans that are quantum leaps ahead of them re data analysis.No wonder they are heading for the hills.
I feel really sick at what has happened in PA and the data proves it. But I am sitting here thinking, if this data goes to a court, can one imagine anyone in that aging crowd “getting” one single iota of It? Especially in PA. There’s really a lot of acid in the water we drink. I can only imagine the result,
Case dismissed! “we aren’t statistically inclined, want one cent of the money lining our pockets to hire an analyst that can explain this too us. Case Dismissed” Next….Oh but they didn’t realize the next case would be PA Citizens to Impeach vs Governor Wolfe.
Wolfe will go down in history for selling out its citizens. For his forking Dem agenda. A TRAITOR. But then again I wonder if Wolfe was elected re Dominion Software too?
Pattern analysis like this was perfectly legitimate when the objective was to prove systemic racism back in the last few decades of the 20th century. A vast body of law was written on this predicate.
I think Team Trump knows Barr/Wray are part of the opposition and that is why you see them working directly with state legislators. Its going to be individual states, essentially Federalism, that saves the Union. Of course, nothing is guaranteed.
Sidney Powell better come up with something good this week. I’m getting tired of being portrayed as this guy …
Remember it is WE not ” i ” in this fight.
The court is not the only battlefield this war is being waged on, it’s also upon us the people to take a very loud and visible stand.
Rallies and contacting our leaders.
The attorneys are doing all they can.
TIME TO ASK WHAT WE NEED TO DO FOR OUR PART.
Father God CRUSH the enemy to powder and thwart all their plans!
And please do in this life rather than only the next.
Once, I watched a show about a UFO incident. Very well documented, lots of photos and videos, of a formation of lights in the night sky. They held position steady until one by one they disappeared. As a military vet I knew at once I was looking at parachute flares. Super bright, dropped from an aircraft, they descend slowly to the ground via parachute providing illumination for ground troops. Civilians who had never seen these before were baffled.
Here’s where it gets interesting: The military public affairs office denied that there was military training in the area at the time. A UFO researcher who examined the video claimed analysis of the spectrum is all wrong for military flares. He smelled a coverup.
Further investigation revealed there was indeed an Air National Guard unit training in the area at the time, and they did drop parachute flares from a C-130 military aircraft. The disappearance of the lights one by one corresponded to the ridgeline of distant hills; and the color anomaly the UFO researcher was hanging his coverup theory on (this isn’t anything manmade!) was an artifact of the video and his monitor.
What I’m getting at here is, there are a lot of crackpots out there. I’m not sure what this guy is saying happened, but it’s not exactly convincing IMO. I’m beginning to have my doubts about some of these claims. Sidney Powell is staking her reputation on this, I really hope she knows what she’s doing and isn’t just stepping outside her area of expertise and being misled by people who think they know things.
Len Wood is a great attorney, but he isn’t an expert on election law. He embarrassed himself in his Georgia lawsuit by citing old case law.
Jeffrey Coley- I take it you are trying to discredit Lin Wood?
Not at all. However, the lawsuit he filed in Georgia did get smacked down hard by the judge. He’s well outside his legal specialty here.
You’re forgetting the ‘from the outside’ statistical anomalies. Don’t have to know or guess what was done to know that some number sequences should obey Benford’s Law. Don’t have to know or guess anything in order to say that if mail-in votes aren’t ‘well stirred’ (and thus in a pretty steady ratio between candidates as counting proceeds then those are not really mail-in ballots.
Those failings don’t give a clue about how the data were manipulated but they do say that the odds of them being what they claim are roughly zero.
The Biden Border Surge has already begun. Lockdowns forever.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/11/it_begins_the_biden_border_surge_never_mind_about_the_lockdowns.html
The new, and sole, requirement for naturalization and benefits: set one foot across the border while wearing a mask.
Not in some psst Venezuelan election, but in the U.S. on Novembrr 3rd, some one, or some small group of real people, sent out the word to shut down the count on election night and then to put in the intentionally hard-to-detect software fix to give tge win to Biden.
I’m of the opinion that unless someone from that group or someone who received those orders, comes forward, all of this circumstantial evidence will be dismissed by any court, including SCOTUS.
Only an affidavit from such persons or a true audit of legal votes, will change the outcome in Trump’s favor. I’m not giving up quite yet, but it’s not looking good.
To strengthen your spine in the fight for the truth, listen to Sydney Powell.
“We are not going to be intimidated. We are not going to back down. We are going to clean this mess up now. President Trump won by a landslide. We are going to prove it. And we are going to reclaim the United States of America for the people who vote for freedom.”
I watched the first half of the video and realized that the vote numbers are the same for the precincts he was comparing during each time frame. This makes it look like there are recurring trends of the same percentages but it is just the computer system checking in with the same data.
There is no manipulation in the numbers as those timestamps are not new votes coming in but the same vote count until new numbers come in. It is perfectly reasonable for precincts around the state or county to end up with the same ratio at some point throughout the night. I don’t believe his sheets prove any voter manipulation. I personally downloaded the full list he had on the website and sorted by county. I then added up the last vote count by timestamp for each precinct in the county. It comes to the exact vote count listed on every election new site. The numbers in between the first and last timestamp for each precinct are just the running count, not additional votes coming in. I am not suggesting the possibility of manipulation but this does not prove it. Am I missing something?
It could be an explanation, how exactly the system moves numbers around should be part of data forensic analysis.
But for the sake of it, let me ask a counter question.
Why would any election system have a need to check in repeatedly with the same numbers?
And if there is a polling of “Station X give me your numbers” would there be a human on the other side going “oh I got one more results request, better fat finger in the same numbers” I doubt it is a human, as that would be a source for errors.
But then could this be an indication that the systems were actually networked? And networked over the Internet? (Which would be illegal)
Again it needs to be investigated. The challengers at the counting centers were repeatedly told they could not investigate the computers and to “Trust them”
The author of this analysis noted that some of the ratios looked odd, 1/48, 1/18, 4/65, 3/48, 4/63, 5/31, 1/6, 1/5 & 1/4.
I worked on these today and think I have the answer. The decimal Inverse of the above series is:
(48/1) 48.00, (18/1) 18.00, (65/4) 16.25, (48/3) 16.00. (63/5) 15.75, (31/5) 6.20, (6/1) 6.00, (5/1) 5.00 & (4/1) 4.00. At two decimal places they all end with either 0 or 5. [ XX.X0 or XX.X5 ]
All digits beyond the second decimal place are zero.
This is indicative of a number with one decimal place being divided by 2.
Examples: (1.0 / 2) = 0.50, (1.1 / 2) = 0.55, (1.2 / 2) = 0.60, > > (1.9 / 2) = 0.95.
Multiplying the decimal inverse series by 2 we get the numbers from which the ratios were derived:
96.0, 36.0. 32.5, 32.0, 31.5, 12.4, 12.0, 10.0 & 8.0
I don’t have enough information to know what the numbers represent other than they are shown to be used repeatedly by sets of precincts simultaneously for hours and then switched and immediately used by other sets of precincts.
The ratios are not random, they are calculated.
It is difficult to accept that for years all our votes have meant nothing. That the outcome of our elections has been determined by some guys with an agenda that is not ours who are pushing and pulling buttons that show the votes for the candidates THEY want, not the candidates WE want. I need to amend that – our election results are sometimes determined by who is the highest bidder, which candidate was able to pay the most to the owners of the voting machines. He or she, Dem. or Rep. gets the position. Ick.
How are we going to get rid of these machines? We need to do this. It will not be an easy job. I predict a ton of opposition.