An interesting review of Philadelphia ballot uploading results indicates a pattern of manipulated results according to an independent researcher looking at raw data. The results are discussed within a video upload explaining how the data-sets were organized and manipulated in a series of timed events.
(WATCH HERE)
According to the analysis: “in this data, particular vote ratios are transferred between random sets of seized precincts throughout the day.”
“The Dominion System isolated a “Flip Set” from the expected vote count and the expected percentage. It then splices the Flip Set into multiple “ratio sets” and assigns them to precincts throughout the day. Once a particular “ratio set” receives the votes it needed, it releases that set, and then Dominion injects it into the city wide count.”
“To hide it’s trail, Dominion reassigns the same “ratio set” to different (random) precincts throughout the day, so that the same precinct doesn’t keep getting the exact same ratio (or the same set of precincts).”
“During a particular period of time while a precinct is selected, it gives Trumps an EXACT NUMBER of votes, it gives Biden a MINIMUM number of votes, and splits the small remainder to a third party or to Biden (via random assignment).” (link to video and raw data)
Dominion Software operates ballot counting in at least 28 States:
as a computer-data geek, exactly how I would approach this in order to hide my tracks.
If you can DougJ, step up and offer your skills Patriot>
He’s making a statement, not asking rhetorically.
He omitted the word “that’s” before “exactly how…”
This seems interesting.
Dominion has vacated their offices in Toronto, Ontario , Canada in the dead of night.
“Nothing to see there, folks.”
(Literally, since they’ve snuck away.)
Hunt them down. I hope the Spec-Op teams are on their trail.
All they did was sell the software. It’s the people who bought and used it that are the criminals.
OK.
But when push comes to shove…
Are we talking “indications”?
Or Proof ??!?!?
Civil.rules.apply. OJ walked.on murder.but.was.killed.in civil court.
This is interesting but doesn’t match what other people have found in some states like Dr. Shiva. Maybe some ratios were local operator corrections and others were globally applied from Europe.
I listened to the lengthy Solomon presentation, and I don’t think it necessarily contradicts Dr. Shiva. Dr. S plotted the data reflects that as the collection period draws out, Trump’s votes decreases. I am not a statistician, but watching Solomon’s flow of the flipping also results in Trump’s vote count being diminished as collection time goes forward.
Agree. I watched Dr. Shiva’s presentation and his data shows that in 3 Michigan counties, votes were manipulated in every precinct where the GOP receives at least 20% of the vote.
That means hundreds of precincts in each county.
And the more Republican the precinct, the larger the percentage of Trump votes that were stolen.
It’s kind of another way to put it. Ratio magic. Ratios can be simplified, presented as decimals or left with the GCF as the denominator. Pretty much the same concept.
I think Dr. Shiva’s analysis has a flaw in it. This article explains it in too much detail and is unnecessarily hostile, but it explains it: https://kabir-naim.medium.com/dr-shiva-ayyadurai-the-danger-of-data-charlatans-4f675ffe793c
I don’t think that the first digit Benford’s law can be applied, since voting data does not span many decades of magnitude. It might be possible to use Benford’s law to the least significant digit or bottom two digits, but I haven’t checked that yet.
The spreadsheet analysis may be pointing out a real fraud technique, but I wonder. How many precincts are there? If there is a huge number, it could be possible that these ratios are repeated in other precincts somewhere, when the updates come in.
There are people doing linear regression analysis, which seem to show that the Dominion algorithm is much simpler and just applies a multiplicative factor through the entire race on a precinct by precinct basis.
Of course, it is possible that the Dominion software is applying more than one cheating algorithm. It would be really nice to get the source code on the Dominion machines. There would be no guessing or deduction required.
Thanks, FBI, for nothing. They should have confiscated the machines a week ago.
It appears that multiple techniques were used to cheat. Old school stuff, like dead people voting and multiple votes from and individual, fake ballots and computer fraud, including automated algorithms, and manual deletion/addition of votes (which is a feature of the voting software, according to the manual). This election was tampered with in so many ways it will probably never be possible to determine an accurate count.
Also, using law of large numbers analysis, there are spikes that should not occur after the scatter pattern seen in in-person voting. Mail ballots are generally randomized in the mail, so those cumulative average vote lines should be fairly smooth, but rural areas tend to be red and vote Trump, so later mail would go Trump, yet there’s huge late spikes for Biden and dips for Trump where his votes disappeared to make room for those fake Biden ballots. They needed to keep below a reasonable voter turnout threshold. These lines in these questionable states don’t look like fair election lines.
If I am understanding these correctly, and what you stated above about the spikes, that would likely be true in a somewhat normal election with mailed ballots being scattered.
Given the reporting in WI and elsewhere about group homes and nursing homes being used to harvest ballots, I wonder if some of those spikes are batches of ballots all being dropped in the mail one day, and delivered and counted another.
I haven’t looked at how many ballots are in a spike, but if a batch of 60 ballots from a nursing home were dropped in the mail, delivered then counted, it might account for a spike if an individual filled out all 60 ballots for Biden and dropped the batch in the mail.
On the other hand, if the spike consists of actually thousands of ballots, how do you account for such a spike making it’s way through the mail as a batch?
I don’t think Kabir is correct. Dr. Shiva was plotting percentages. I would expect the %s to be within a defined range with some but not great variation. Thus you would expect to see a lateral pattern line like a straight line – not a line with downward slope. The number of split votes might increase with larger votes but the % should be within that range and not creat a sloping line.
I know it takes time and they don’t want to name witnesses until the last moment possible, but I really hope stuff hits the fan this week-
why? let the coup commit more crimes while they are being watched. let them commit the damn crimes.
certifying fraud = crime.
changing manual at midnight to address rud’ys lawsuit = crime (wisconsin)
keep going! I love it , keep committing crimes! DNI is our guy this time! Ratcliffe is there for the executive order , not TRAITRO COATS.
get it? GOOD!
You can stop them go to DC i did call the whitehouse and McConnel also call your state legislature. Look at it tbis way. The longer our President f8ghts the more the wall gets built abd the more judges he gets confirmed but you need to do your part i did. Im msking great money in this economy all 9f you shoulf. Tonight i slerp tommorow Church and Monday through Saturday work.We have our President until January 23rd. He can uncover a lot of fraud. Plus vote for him again. If tnis had been any other President he would have givin up or bern impeached. He left a great life to help us if not Clinton would have won. Trump 2020
“Tonight I slerp”
Yes and whatever you’re slerping is affecting your typing accuracy. ?
LMAO
Please go a little more gently, GB. There appear to be two languages fighting for primacy within the grey matter of our new friend.
Bienvenido al nuevo participante en la discusión diaria: el Señor José Rosario.
Now for the local PA news du jour – Pay particular attention to the final bullet point item.
A federal judge in the Middle District of PA just shut down our POTUS team’s request to block the certification. He deemed the matter “without merit”:
– A federal judge in Pennsylvania on Saturday rejected a legal effort by President Donald Trump’s campaign to block the certification of millions of votes in the state.
– The certification is expected to confirm a win for President-elect Joe Biden.
– The judge’s scathing decision is a crippling blow to Trump’s extremely long-shot bid to invalidate enough ballots in multiple states to reverse Biden’s victory in the national presidential election.
– “This Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by the evidence,” Judge Matthew Brann wrote.
I’m sure this isn’t the end of the road, but the decision slapped me upside the head. Judge Matthew Brann, appointed to the federal bench in 2013, by Guess Who.
The President’s legal team fully anticipated this ridiculous decision, irrational comments, and judicial blowhardism. Their public statement made that clear that this simply expedites their path to SCOTUS.
Next step, Appellate Court.
With love, of course!
Perhaps the individual typing may be using a language translator. Easy partner.
Yesterday Ms. Powell said she would be presenting the case within the next 2 weeks!
In one interview she said next Friday, since the courts were open. Today, Jordan Sekulow said one lawsuit would be filed Monday in GA. Everything is moving so fast the filing date is moving too!
Yay! Thanks Maine Coon
From what I understand, is that there are (at least) two legal teams. There is the ACLJ/Sekulow team that is filing lawsuits which are targeting more conventional election fraud techniques (dead voters, fake ballots, multiple votes, throwing out military votes, etc) and the Sidney Powell/Rudy Gulliani team which is addressing the Dominion/Smartmatic electronic election fraud. Then there is Lin Wood, who I think filing a suit on his own behalf, since he is a resident of GA, he has standing to file such a suit. Then there are a bunch of other organizations and individuals that have filed suits.
The GA filing on Monday will be by ACLJ team, I believe. The Sidney team doesn’t seem ready to file their lawsuits yet & it sounds like they intend to file in multiple states pretty much simultaneously.
https://gph.is/1CQR1Cu
I started watching that video, and granted, I was tired, but I couldn’t follow what he was trying to explain.
I watched it and it didn’t hold up. On one of his examples he used a 3 of 48 vote ratio which is actually 1 of 16. He showed Trump with 9 votes then extrapolated it to 134 votes for his argument when actually 9 times 16 is 144. I hope Sundance looks at the numbers carefully.
the numbers and division shit doenst matter.
all one needs to do to see if what he is saying IS REAL or not. is DO YOU SEE a ratio – MATCHING to other preceints, Directly after the global update.
…all one has to know is “300%” of the people voted
Yes! arrest the census people! lol
Exactly. It’s the theory of the algorithm that is relevant and then factually proven by innumerable exhibits.
I can see it when he points it out. I can’t pick it out myself. The timing says the most to me. No way that could be coincidental at all. This fits with Dr. Shiva’s analysis mentioned above. It also fits with the shots they have of real time election totals where there is a sudden switch of votes from Trump to Biden. I’ve seen 3 of those captured.
You were looking at the wrong column. You’ll notice 144 two columns over from the 134 you are referencing.
I hope you look at the numbers carefully.
I hope so… but why didn’t he reduce the fraction to begin with.
It isn’t necessary to reduce the fraction- 3/48ths is the same as 1/16th. It is ok to sometimes not reduce to the the lowest denominator.
With you Michael. Not sure what the naysayer was looking at. What I saw was really well done. Choppy, yes, because he was doing some stuff on the fly. But it absolutely showed a pattern of ratio transfer to “receiver” precincts. What I saw says this. There should be a national security emergency declared.
People didn’t just interfere with a Federal Election, they CHANGED a FEDERAL ELECTION!
Someone needs to step in and step in quick. If the FBI won’t then turn it over to the military. I mean SWAT TEAM & Special Ops level raids in and out of country. With tremendous urgency.
“There should be a national emergency declared”. There is if I understand Trump’s 2018 EO on election interference. Last sentence of the preamble ” I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with this threat.” Wouldn’t want to be on the receiving end of this EO.
Hopefully people are being arrested at this moment.
Yes, this election was held during a National Emergency declared by Trump in his EO this past September.
And rate of transfer.
Go to 13:37 in the video and notice the numbers. You were looking at the Biden column where 134 appeared. The ratio uses Trump:Total, not Trump:Biden.
Not only did you cherry-pick an example to discredit the researcher (while ignoring everything he got right)… your example was wrong, and you seem to have misunderstood the basics.
Not sure if you are a shill or a genuinely worried patriot… but you need to TRY HARDER.
Not a spreadsheet person, are you.
Nor have you used a spreadsheet in making presentations to mathematic neophytes.
If the spreadsheet shows 3 in one column and 48 in another column, you do not change the visible numbers to your mental 1 of 16!!!
Unless you enjoy spending hours trying to explain to people why you state numbers that are not in the spreadsheet; and I do mean hours.
Stick with the explicit! Avoid the implicit!
Which is also a programmer rule; unless you prefer to have some unknown programmer making assumptions for you.
I saw that. President Trump got 9 votes out of 143. Biden got 134. Noticed the decimal ratio on far right was 0.0625 which is 1/16.
Not the point. Look at the end, he draws it out with pictures and everything. Explained well in the last ten minutes. Great analysis, actually.
Difficult to slog through, for sure, but the algorithm is slick. Can it be boiled down on the witness stand so the judge clearly understands it? That’s the key.
Exactamundo!
Listening from 46:25 to 48:50 gives you a good summary of his work.
This could easily be boiled down to an easily digestible presentation. He just needs to add a few columns and rows that emphasize the findings.
Clearly he was going for a quick release of findings at this point.
I agree with a little more time he could make it a lot easier to understand. I have a feeling that the Trump lawyers are going thru the hole data set and extrapolating all the data into something that is very easy to understand. If your not familiar with spreadsheets a person would get lost with this presentation.
Al B. – Yes, of course. As in every field a Sadistics, err, I mean Statistics Expert Witness will put the polish on it. That’s a non-issue. The larger point is, someone CHANGED A FEDERAL ELECTION. If that isn’t a breach on National Security, someone explain to me, how and why not. And how long does this country wait to begin raiding homes, offices and government facilities?
and most likely using and involving foreign entities to conduct the breach;, Spain, Germany, Canada, maybe Serbia.
Amy, Brett, Neil, Sam and Clarence are all brilliant and WILL understand it!
And when they’re done, they should all have an ice cold beer to celebrate (on Brett, of course).
Any intelligent Judge should be able to understand what is being presented. If the Judge is really poor at numbers, then they are supposed to be intelligent enough to request help from someone they trust.
I made a similar comment down thread before seeing yours. My other thought is that I would think most lawyers are basically left-brained which would mean they will grasp this information rather readily.
Subject matter experts are seemed qualified in their field to analyze and present the information. They get paid big bucks to make the complex understandable for judges and juries. Don’t worry.
According to an article in GP, there are internet devices, and people who know how to USE them, that they were using on election night and the next day, that can monitor the election results in “real time”;
They WATCHED it happen, and took videos and screen shots of the flips, AS THEY HAPPENED.
Assuming that is an accurate report, Sidney and Rudy “don’t NEED no stinkin’ SERVERS.
These election cases, to settle who one, aren’t CRIMINAL cases, they are CIVIL cases, which means its NOT “Evidence beyond a reasonable doubt”, its “a PREPONDERANCE of the evidence”.
So, technically if 51 percent of the evidence supports TeamTrumps case, they SHOULD prevail.
Also, Rudy pointed out once, but hasn’t bothered to repeat; a unusual aspect of election law. In Criminal cases, and most civil cases, the one MAKING the accusation, has the “burden of proof”.
NOT SO in election law. Basically, ALL these cases by TeamTrump, are challenging the validity of BALLOTS. Legally, THAT is the challenge and the issue.
And, by longstanding precedent, the party CHALLENGING the validity of the ballot doesn’t have to PROVE (again, by a preponderance of the evidence) that the ballot is invalid. In election law, the OTHER party, argueing that the ballots are valid, has the burden of proff, to prove they are valid.
And, they CAN’T! The Validation process, INHERENTLY includes observers, so any ballot that was processed without observers present was INHERENTLY not valid, and must not be counted.
And, since they discarded the envelope, during the processing of the ballot, their is no way they can later, in court, PROVE that these ballots are valid. Again, they MUST be not counted.
Discard the ballots, on that basis alone, and PDJT wins Penn, Wis, Mich, and probably all the States that shut down counting, and/or blocked observers from effectively participating in the validation process.
Thats before we even get into dead people, multiple state people, or any of the rest of the shenanigans, and of coarse Dominion software.
Just on that basis alone, PDJT wins reelection, and the only way they can prevent it, is with crooked judges throwing the case, which they can appeal on an emergency basis.
I wonder how Alito is feeling right about now, learning that they IGNORED, and in fact VIOLATED his order to sequester, AND NOT COUNT any votes recieved after Nov 3, at 8:00 p.m. and that poll workers were specifically trained to ignore his order?
and them DESTROYING the envelopes that they would need to prove their vote count and custody DIDNT HELP their case in PROVING rude was wrong.
losers!
Sorry judge, we destroyed our evidence to prove we have legal votes.
RUDY^ not rude
That makes absolutely perfect sense dutchman. I hope you and I get to meet at Trump’s inauguration.
I will definitely be there to support the man.
That makes absolutely perfect sense dutchman. I hope you and I get to meet at Trump’s inauguration.
I will definitely be there to support the man.
Dutch- I heard Sidney Powell on an interview with Glenn Beck or the interview posted here at CTH where she described the process of “watching” election data on election night.
What I heard her say is that “they” were watching the internet data in real time going through the internet. “They” had a system or something built that allows them to see and interpret the data in real time that was flowing through the internet.
“They” have pictures of the data being changed in real time from intercepted internet data.
If I understood this correctly, Game Over.
You heard correctly. Do we really think Trump approached this election totally unprepared and let them steal his Presidency and America along with it?
My admittedly limited understanding is: Team Trump was totally prepared on November 3 as they had already penetrated the Dominion/Smatmatic/Scytl system in which, via the internet, hostile actors in many countries participated in counting and manipulating ballots both genuine and fraudulent. Team Trump had hacked into that system and monitored the vote manipulation in real time. Applying blockchain technology used in the Quantum Financial System (QFS), Team Trump wizards de facto created a “Quantum Voting System” (QVS) that captured the entire operation. Blockchain captures and timestamps virtual records of all transactions, and stores and encrypts in “blocks” transactions as they change incrementally. Blockchain has many applications and is used in currency trading, bitcoin transactions, and …
“… blockchain could be used to facilitate a modern voting system. Voting with blockchain carries the potential to eliminate election fraud and boost voter turnout, as was tested in the November 2018 midterm elections in West Virginia. Using blockchain in this way would make votes nearly impossible to tamper with. The blockchain protocol would also maintain transparency in the electoral process, reducing the personnel needed to conduct an election and providing officials with nearly instant results. This would eliminate the need for recounts or any real concern that fraud might threaten the election.“
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/blockchain.asp
I’ve seen a camera view from the ceiling looking down on workers filling out empty ballots for Joe.
They’ve filmed it while it was happening.
They didn’t have to see up close, they were already being monitored by a camera!
Great explanation, Dutchman, but how do we know who those ballots were for that were invalid? If they were for our President how could he gain more votes!
Tom Graham @tom2badcat Nov 7
… On Election night, Trump and his campaign team assembled in the Eisenhower Building just west if the White House to watch the results come in. Know what is there? A SCIF.
Trump’s QFS Blockchain Sting Operation
https://twitter.com/i/status/1324818461370011653
The Kracken is the name of the DIA program that they were watching the fraud with.
UT’s Kraken Supercomputer First Academic Computer to Break Petascale
https://news.utk.edu/2009/10/06/kraken-supercomputer-first-to-break-petascale/
agree. me too.
Too much information and my inability to lay it all out
I get it now.
Lovely and thank you Dutchman
If they invalidate a state’s count, I don’t think it means that PDJT wins the state. It means that that state’s vote cannot be certified and they cannot select electors. Which means that neither candidate would have 270 EV’s and it would go to the House. I believe 27 state delegations will be majority GOP, 19 will be democrat and 4 will be tied.
Can you trust the Republicans in the House?
Is it in the House where the states get only one vote each?
My understanding is that each state gets two votes. There are more democrat representatives but more republican states. So it would depend if they split vote. But the state legislature can and technically does pick the electors. So I am not sure that it would necessarily be thrown into the House of Representatives.
And I heard something that, if true, is REALLY weird. That after the House votes for the president, who would be Trump, it’s then up to the Senate to vote for VP. No, the person who ran with the president doesn’t automatically stay attached to him… nope, it’s up to the Senate. And who do THEY choose from? The top 2 vote-getters. In other words, it’s between Trump and Biden. So… if this is correct, that means the Senate would have to pick Biden as VP!
How absolutely BIZARRE would that be?! And when I first thought about it, I was like How Horrible! But NO, maybe not. Because in reality, the VP has almost no real power on his own, other than what he’s delegated by the president. So… 🙂 🙂
“Hey Joe, they’re dedicating a new sewage plant up in Juneau tomorrow. I think it would make them happy if you handled the ribbon-cutting ceremony.”
Sidney Powell is a famous wizard and has many assisting her, but I badly needed that explanation from you, Dutchman. NOW I have hope our Republic will be saved! Many thanks.
I love numbers, and I love Spreadsheets, but I have not idea what that guy was saying. One thing that he said repeatedly was that the software “transferred the ratio”. WTF is that supposed to mean ? We see a column of votes for Trump, and a column of votes for Biden. What does it mean to Transfer a Ratio ? I am at a total loss.
That guy is probably pretty smart, but he isn’t smart enough to explain what he is doing.
Lol… very easy to get confused but let me try and give you the jist of it. The Dominion system is designed to take your 1 vote for Trump and break it into .1, .2, .3., .4, .5, .6, .7, .8, .9 tenths of a vote. You are thinking in whole numbers like 1, 2, 3….. going into the actual Election Day they already knew how many people either turned in a mail-in ballot, an absentee ballot and or actually voted early by walking in to vote prior to Election Day and also knew their Party affiliation. What they didn’t know was not only how many people would still show up on Election Day to vote in-person but how many Republicans would show up in-person. So, when the votes were being registered or put/fed into the machines on Election Day his spreadsheet told what time with a time-stamp those votes were being tabulated in real-time. The algorithm was designed to take a batch of votes regardless of who the individual voted for and to give enough to Biden or to Trump to ensure a Biden win based on STATE WIDE tabulations. That spread/algorithm moved from one voting place (precinct) to another within about 5 minutes once certain vote-spreads were obtained in one precinct so as to hide the manufacturing of votes for Biden. When one precinct reached its quota the algorithm switched to another set of precincts. This system also laundered votes through the 3rd-Party candidate to hide the trail. Your 1 vote for Trump NEVER existed. They took your 1 vote, broke it up into tenths of a vote (his video did not show this) and applied it where they needed to to ensure a Biden win! However, what they did NOT anticipate was that the Election Day walk-in votes for Trump was so HIGH even in heavily Democratic areas that they had to stop/slow the vote tabulation down to a crawl in order to manufacturer fraudulent ballots for Biden late at night or just after midnight and have them delivered around 4am to be tabulated without being validated in order to overcome the vote deficit that Biden had even after their algorithm failed. This is why in Michigan for example those fraudulent ballots were being assigned to voters who never showed up to vote, were dead, or they entered them all in with the same birth date. They had to make them legitimate which is why they also had to make sure the Republican observers were kept too far back to see what they were doing. This is also why some precincts had 200% to 300% of its eligible voters showing up to vote which is impossible. Had they NOT done the ballot dump they would have lost on election night (as they really truly did) and wouldn’t have gotten caught however, getting caught still potentially gets rid of Trump which is the goal. Never let the truth and what’s right get in the way of the goal – that’s what the Left is all about.
My favorite post since the election.
Thank you for that brilliant explanation
“asking for a friend”
Yes, the coordinated counting freeze in critical states and late night ballot dumps set off the alarm.
Those ballot dumps show up in the data. They must have been driven mad with panic to even try this.
For the Swamp, Deep State and their Uniparty puppets, this is now an unwinnable situation.
They are going to fight like cornered animals. But the more they fight, the more they will lose.
Can Trump build them a “golden bridge” to retreat over? Would his 80 million supporters even back such an effort?
Let me take a crack at an explanation. For example, an algorithm was used to modify a subset of votes for 4 precincts. It was set to give 20 votes to Biden for every Trump vote. The votes assigned to Trump were a fixed number. So, it gave Trump 10 votes for example. Then Biden received 200 or 20 times the Trump vote.
Any extra votes were randomly given to Biden or a 3rd party candidate because the Trump vote was fixed by assignment.
Then, at a set time, the 20 to 1 Biden ratio was transferred to a different set of 3 precincts, as opposed to the original 4 precincts approximately 5 minutes after it stopped for the original 4 precincts.
There’s the impossibility. Multiple precincts can’t have exactly a 20 to 1 ratio that switches 5 minutes after one set of precincts stops…over and over again. One random group would stop, then another random group would start up shortly after the last group stopped with the exact same ratio.
This process puts an entirely new perspective on a 3rd party candidate “siphoning off” Dem votes.
Given the above example, votes stolen from Trump were randomly assigned to Biden or the 3rd party candidate. So, when the 3rd party candidate received a bunch of unexpected votes, many were likely Trump.votes.
Now, apply that to previous elections.
They were using the same fraud, they were just rotating new districts in so that no one would get suspicious
Exactly. Clever bastards!
But if there are hundreds of precincts and they are all, or many are, updated at the same time, there are bound to be a few that have the same voting ratio as a few did in the previous update, no? This is just random probabilities, a few in the new update will have the same ratio as a few in the previous update. What am I missing?
You didn’t miss anything. Yes you could get the random probability of a couple, maybe 3 having the same ratio. I think the catch however is in the timing and the fact there are usually 5-6 precincts with the same ratio entered one after the other.
The guy is a mathematician. He sees human behavior in numbers. He apparently has analyzed lots of data. I have trouble seeing like he does as I do not have his smarts, but I get a basic understanding. So he sees pattern in the votes that is not normal. He is saying there is a formula that will take votes from Trump and give them to Biden. The formula is selective and hits different precincts, the % it steals varies. This is to avoid detection. It seems to trigger at 9 am, 3 pm, and 10 pm
Sundance posted this guy last week. He found a similar pattern but explains it using charts that make it easier to understand.
Using small random numbers as examples, they know Biden needed 200,000 votes to beat votes coming in for Trump to win.
Stuffing a single ballot box with 200,000 ballots would be too obvious, so they split the ballot box stuffing among several precincts.
Precincts Alpha, Bravo and Charlie were assigned the ratio of making up 100 Biden votes for every 1 vote for Trump. A 100 to 1 ratio. Assigning all 200,000 votes to just 3 precincts would stand out, so they had to transfer that 100 to 1 ratio to other precincts at different time periods to hide the theft. 100 Biden votes for every 1 Trump vote over several days in the same precincts would be obvious.
Precincts Delta, Echo and Foxtrot got the transfer at a certain time, so they had to count 100 votes for Biden to every 1 vote for Trump for a period of time. When they still did not have the 200,000, they transferred the 100 to 1 ration to the next set of precincts.
Precincts Golf, Hotel and India then had to count 100 votes for Biden for every 1 Trump vote. Again, if they still did not have the 200,000 needed, the transfer continued.
Once they reached 200,000, it was enough to beat Trump. so they stopped transferring the ratio.
Now, 100 to 1 would also be obvious in just a few precincts, so they had to come up with ratios they needed, in multiple precincts they thought would be believable. 100 votes for Biden to every 1 vote for Trump in Antrim county would not be believable, which I believe is why it stood out, and the theft started to unravel.
If PA had 1000 voting precincts, one would expect to see 1000 different ratios. Seeing the same ratio over multiple precincts stands out because it is not random.
Not sure I’ll be exactly right here, but I’ll give it a try:
Anytime he was talking about a ratio, he meant Trump:Total not Trump:Biden. Let’s say that in a given precinct, during one particular data dump/update, Trump got 5 out of every 30 votes… so 5:30. (Call this “original ratio”) Now fast-forward to the next time that particular precinct updates, at which point new numbers come in, and it’s most likely a totally different ratio. Okay, fine.
HOWEVER, this guy found that on many occasions (and there are likely many more), at almost the same time that precinct changed to another ratio, ANOTHER precinct came in with that THEIR update that just coincidentally had the EXACT SAME “original ratio”. So… while a particular precinct having a particular ratio isn’t weird, if that exact ratio then shows up in a different precinct just after the first one no longer had it is VERY suspicious. Especially seeing that happened many times (and probably many more that the guy hadn’t found yet).
Little to convoluted for my tastes..
When the ratio doesn’t perfectly fit well will make it fit by adding votes to a third party or extra biden votes …… it doesn’t confirm the theory
I’m glad he is independently trying to solve the program puzzle.. but IMHO no court judge would buy this..
MAGA
Seems inconceivable to me that either candidate’s percentage from a given precinct would always be a whole number percentage. Nobody ever got, say, 37.86% of the votes in that precinct? Maybe I’m misunderstanding.
Oh my God, yes! Forget about the “transfer” issue (even though that’s important); there’s something even bigger.
I just went back and watched that again. ONLY focused on the Trump:Total ratio. And every one I saw, every single one, was a PERFECT WHOLE NUMBER. Biden’s might be a ratio you’d expect, some odd number, but NOT Trump’s. For instance if Trump got 53 votes, whatever number the Total votes there were, you’d expect that dividing one into the other would usually give you some remainder, right? WRONG.
When Trump got 53 votes, it was from a Total of 265… when divided, exactly 5.
Trump got 7, the Total was 336… exactly 48.
Trump got 9, the Total was 144… exactly 16.
Trump got 57, the Total was 342… exactly 6.
These are just a few example I found from quickly scanning through, there are countless more.
How is this not a “smoking gun”?!
I keep asking what is the Proof that people like Tucker Carlson keep demanding going to LOOK like? I sure hope this is not the final draft.
No… ignore Biden or 3rd-party votes. Just focus on Trump votes. The ratio of Trump to TOTAL votes. THAT is where the ratios are precise, exact, and THAT is where the ratios appear to “transfer” from one precinct to the next.
I am NOT a math person. Fortunately, my husband is a mathematical genius. He watched the video with me (and then for quite a while after I migrated off because my head was spinning.) Instead of really explaining to me in detail, he gave me the bottom line:
Random patterns in math are just that – random patterns. If they repeat they are no longer random patterns. The fact that they do – over and over – is evidence of manipulation.
Good – that I get!
I would also think basic accounting principals would apply exactly the same way. And we already have laws and regulations and accounting principles and guidelines that declare these patterns fraud.
Exactly the comparison my husband made to me – consider banking audits. This would NEVER be allowed to stand. Never.
Yes!….and even less random is when a cluster of precincts has the same non-random pattern and then it suddenly transfers to a different cluster of precincts & now they are non-random pattern with that same number…..
I’m a CPA and your husband is right. But the biggest take away for laymen in all of this is, the patterns transfer at exactly the same time!!!! They are time stamped!!! So on top being exact which is nearly impossible, they then transfer their exactness at the exact same time!!!
Unreal.
And there is a way to substantiate this fraud. I was a public company auditor and my suggestion in this instance is to recanvass two to four of these precincts as a scope. Get each voters vote verified. And if those don’t match the voting machine within a predetermined % due to humans not sharing honest votes etc, you’ll find the fraud.
I say this because overalls ballots may match by creating fake ballots, but if you verify overall vote per precinct in actuality the fraud will be exposed.
Bingo!
They had to stop counting and rush in those ballots marked only for Biden to make the overall tally match.
But that panic move creates its own problems: precincts with 350% turnout and a single candidate ballot count that is wildly different from the average in other states.
I’ve been saying this from almost the beginning when Shiva’s video came out and then the videos of the vote switches in real time on election night – where PA showed the Trump and Biden totals and then, during a 5 second interval showed their totals again, scrolling across the bottom of the screen, and exactly the amount of votes subtracted from Trump had transferred to Biden.
This was in real time from a CNN broadcast.
Someone should be looking at replays of the live broadcasts for this phenomena and THAT is where they should be looking for the problems. It would certainly help isolate the needles in the haystacks.
You add the data shown in this video to those live streams and you have all the proof you need.
It’s got to be proof – it’s got to be. This election has to be cancelled and either switched to our President or completely done over with only in person and hand counted results.
Now THAT I can understand!
But if you have a population of hundreds of precincts, you are bound to have a few that have the same ratio of votes, say 1/6, that a few different precincts did in the last update. I appreciate the effort, but I don’t think this analysis holds water. Unfortunately
All I had to do was to read the paragraphs above to my husband, a Marine engineer, to receive from him one inescapable conclusion: “It was all designed to cheat.”
I repeat: “It was all designed to cheat.”
thank you, Sundance!
If, when our Trump wins this, let’s demand that federal 2022 elections be certifiable only if the process is:
1) a purple finger vote in person only;
2) on Election Day only;
3) the election is run by a CPA firm;
3.1) which are not subject to sovereign immunity;
4) photo ID mandatory;
5) paper ballot only (machine read but hand countable);
6) chain of custody secured by multiple watchdogs;
The big Accounting Firm winning the State by State bids will probably sublet each precinct to smaller CPA firms across the nation. CPA’s are not likely to lose their cherished license in the commission of fraud. Whereas local county employees have a dishonest politician to answer to.
Yes to all of the above!
No wonder Dominion employees are trying to erase themselves from the socials and close down offices. People need to go to jail.
No. Shot by a firing squad after convicted. This is treason and if they aren’t made examples of, why would the Left ever change its tactics?
“No. Shot by a firing squad after convicted.”
Then, the Left will blame the guns again.
I like the rope. On pay-per-view. One Dollar per hanging. I’ve got $200 set aside. And pay-per-view money to go to Trump’s legal team.
I hope we can get Biden and Monkey Ears convicted of treason.
They never do.
Obama commuted the sentence of Oscar Lopez Rivera and pardoned Bill Ayers.
A treasonous act like rigging a federal election should warrant a death sentence. Don’t let the next democrat president pardon them or commute their sentence.
We’ve been outraged at the coup attempts President Trump has had to withstand. Nothing even resembling a court trial to expose them. None of perpetrators were put in jail.
If it doesn’t stop, we have no hope of holding this republic.
I understand the pent up anger but there’s some possible information to be mined here.
I’d prefer imprisonments and solitary confinement with no visitors or communication for the first two years.
Turn them into mental jelly. They might confess/ reveal a lot more than they have.
Would we still have to feed them?
We shouldn’t be feeding prisoners, period.
Their families should pay for their darn food.
And, if their families don’t pay for it, we’ll, they either do hard labor or they die from starvation.
You want crime to go away then make jail miserable like it used to be…
Great idea!
We shouldn’t be feeding prisoners, period.
Their families should pay for their darn food.
And, if their families don’t pay for it, we’ll, they either do hard labor or they die from starvation.
You want crime to go away then make jail miserable like it used to be…
Yes but I don’t think the law specifies what…?
LOL!!!! ???????
?
No, execute them at the earliest moment.
How about running them through one of their own machines?
They have begun federal executions again all across the U.S.
We should begin treason executions, in my opinion. Line ’em up and execute by firing squad – publicly. Put an end to this madness by rooting out and eliminating the evildoers that attempted a coup of our glorious nation as a warning to future anarchists.
They will go to jail. Some will tried for treason, and executed.
“a pattern of manipulated results according to an independent researcher looking at raw data.”
Praise the Lord that the massive PDJT landslide exposed this FRAUD, something many of us have suspected but could not independently prove.
They are renaming their delicious sandwich to “Philly Cheatstake with Dominion Whiz” in honor of Cheatin’ Joe.
LOL…that’s an awesome insult!
I hope this is the kind of evidence that Sidney will present to the Supreme Court when we get there.
Hopefully she can have some brave soul who care actually demonstrate how this is accomplished.
But, I confident that both Rudy and Sidney know how to satisfy the court.
IANAL, but I’m not sure SCOTUS rules on evidence. They usually rule on the Law or procedure.
Right, but the evidence will lead to the violation of the Law or procedure. The evidence will show what laws have been broken.
This has been on my mind as well. The Dominion piece has to have an avenue to the Supreme court. No chutes and ladders. Jurisdiction and Standing. The case must be filed in the lower courts and work their way up. Unless there is a way to declare some sort of emergency based on national security and approach the Supreme Court? That would require Homeland Security wouldn’t it? If this is presented to an open court now, wouldn’t there be a huge risk of losing the ability to effectively prosecute all involved. Maybe, you could just speak on the mathematical anomalies and keep the scope to that, leading to doubt in the election process. As far as Dominion they have rights to defend themselves, and when they get cornered you can bet your bippy they will lawyer up. This case needs months and months to organize if you are going the criminal route.
Yes, ordinarily the Supreme Court is nothing more than an appeals court… a hugely important appeals court of last resort, but still. As far as I know, they almost never hear “new” evidence. But I’m hoping there’s some exception to that rule, that in that once-in-a-lifetime unique case, they WILL allow new evidence to be presented, and WILL allow much longer than the ordinary allotted time.
Don’t worry. It’s probably just global warming heating up and hence distorting those ratios and making them appear to be other than perfectly fine ratios. Just subtract off the distorting effects caused by global warming and I am sure everything will come out just fine. It is also possible that drinking heavily will make those ratios look normal. So you may need to do that too.
Global warming AND Covid. Yeah, THATS IT.
If you have Covid, it interferes with your ability to look at data objectively, and GW exacerbates the condition, so yeah GC and China virus, THAT explains it!/S
Comment deleted by Admin…
I can hear it now, ‘This wasn’t our doing, it was those same Tik Tok kids who bought all the tickets to the Tulsa Trump rally.’
Very compelling data coming from a variety of sources. I’m especially impressed with the it / data warriors looking at millions of bits of data.
Not to beat on Fox any more than has been but they completely lost me with “president elect Biden” as they presented his recent event. At least twitter adds “the information is disputed” on pro trump tweets related to voting. Fox could perhaps salvage some viewership (respect) by adding a similar qualifier.
Fox wants a Biden presidency. Don’t give them a single view.
Yeah, I don’t want Fux “salvaging” a single viewer, any more than I want Biden salvaging a single bogus vote.
CNN SUCKS, but fuc FUX news, er lies.
ILOT .
nah.. ” Let’em BURN” ..crispier the better
once respect is lost , its gone.
some lessons need to be learned the hard way.
Smoking gun. I have a masters in computer science and math; work with analyzing and interpreting data all day every day. And to me, this looks like a no-brainer given the right people get involved behind whoever takes it into the Courtrooms.
You don’t even need to get access to the Dominion software to reverse engineer it; the proof is in the voting data which is widely available.
A skillful data team and the right attorneys should be able to present a slam-dunk case within a few days.
The real question is, are there enough honest judges or do they all have one track minds “orange man bad”?
Your last question is what keeps me awake at night–only 2 solids I see are Alito and Thomas-sad isn’t it?
I see Thomas as the de facto hard core freedom/liberty Judge on the Court. He is strong in his convictions. He never asked questions for years because what was the point?…he knows how he will vote. Old School, no BS, does not suffer fools, raised right, hardened by his confirmation. Thomas is the key if it goes to the Supremes. He will be a Tsunami.
Helllooo Joe.
I have been having “Visions” of this BOOMING Justice Thomas Voice; “You did NOT keep the Envelopes that these Paper Ballots came In”.??? And you Mixed the “Early Votes” with the “Late Votes”.???…. Therefore; ALL Mail-In Ballots in Penn, Should be Declared; “Null and Void”.!!!
Brett Kavanaugh.
Do you think he will sanction election fraud that elects Kamala Harris possibly into the Presidency?
I doubt that.
Surely he remembers his confirmation hearings.
Apart from anything else – if the evidence is in Trump’s favour – which it undoubtedly is – do you think Gorsuch & Barrett will ignore the evidence and vote to reduce and diminish their own power via an expanded Supreme Court?
Maybe they will, but if they do Trump will have only himself to blame for putting them there without proper vetting.
Kavanaugh,Coney Barrett and Roberts worked on Bush vs Gore litigation which was Courts usurping State Legislatures. They would have some explaining if they deviate from that logic .
Sidney said she doesn’t have a mathematical brain so I hope she has really good help.
Have you thought about contacting her and offering to help – your degrees are nothing to sneeze at.
Frankly, I don’t have a mathematical mind, either, but I get it.
For instance, if they tell the machine to count every Biden vote as 1.25, and every Trump vote as .75, and they take in 50 of each, the total ballots counted will be 100.
And Biden gets 62.50 votes (50×1.25) and Trump gets 37.50 (50×.75)
And the total still equals 100 votes, so nothing off there.
Only problem is, how the hell does either candidate end up with 1/2 a VOTE?
My guess is, thats part of where the drag and drop “feature” came in. The algorythm automatically counted votes at 1.25 for Biden, .75 for Trump, but then they came in and jiggered the #’s, in part to get rid of the fractional parts of a vote.
Frankly, it wasn’t sophisticated or elegant, it was crude. Like the difference between a movie type cat burglar jewel thief, bypassing alarms and hanging from the ceiling,…and a smash and grab.
Like the old school methods of election cheating the Dems have been famous for;
Not complicated, it relied on the system allowing them to get away with it.
It relied on no one really, objectively LOOKING at it.
Have seen reports of ballot dumps that are simply impossible, as the machines can’t count ballots fast enough for there to be any explanation for a 100,000 ballot drop, followed by another 20 minutes later.
In other words “Mr/Ms election official, please explain to the court exactly how you and your team of election workers managed to count that second batch of 100,000 ballots,…in 20 minutes?”
There IS simply NO answer, just as there is NO answer for even ONE State stopping the count, let alone 5-6 states, across multiple time zones, ALL stopping at the SAME time.
Nor is there ANY explanation for barring election observers from effectively participating in the ballot validation process.
And they haven’t even attempted to offer any explanation! THATS what so incredible.
Like Joe on Hunter, they simply aren’t offering ANY explanation. And the medias failure to ask, is PROOF, as Sidney says, that they are “in” on the scamvote.
honestly, you explanation nauseates me.
This is horrible.
People hate President Trump so much.
I mean the hate is abnormal, visceral and deranged.
I think about this so often. Everything, Every single thing the left/democrats say and do, the arrogant crimes against our country they then twist and accuse others.
It is getting to the point where …. I get it. Finally. They are just telling us what they are doing. They are destructive, they destroy people!
My wife and I suddenly found a rare point on which we agree last night—yes, this is abnormal. But, worse than that, it’s literally demonic.
It’s the communist way. They hate everything because they don’t believe in a higher power than themselves.
The Democrat party has morphed into a cult religion
The 2020 election was just as obvious as a rigged election I witnessed back in the days of punch cards when unregistered voters were bused around to different precincts to vote provisional ballots. Everyone knew that the voters residency would not be verified before their ballots were counted. And I mean EVERYONE – the county auditor, Secretary of State, the media, the leadership of major and minor political parties. Nothing clever or sophisticated then or now.
The other MAJOR factor in identifying the program is the groupings break their dependence on the formula every single time in the same grouping at the same TIME. They time stamped the coding. It’s impossible for those precincts to hold together all that time and the ALL break formation simultaneously.
This literally shows human interaction. Amazing they didn’t write a program that randomized everything. God works in mysterious ways.
Interesting thing is that you can’t actually randomize anything using only a digital computer. You can create pseudo-random sequences that simulate randomness pretty well.
You need to add an analog electronic component to get truly random sequences.
That is just an interesting factoid. I think that the reality is that the programmers that developed the Smartmatic software were not particularly clever in their schemes to hide the manipulation. They could have done a much better job, but there was no need. The MSM is completely controlled and that is what has covered for the election fraud that has gone on for at least a decade at this point.
The MSM is a RICO co-conspirator in this election fraud. Anderson Cooper and his buddies need to go to jail.
How does a candidate get a half of a vote?
Fraction Magic.
Yes, and programmed that Hiden’s fractions round up, Trump’s fractions round down and since election boards/canvassers don’t seem to care if the total number of votes cast is different from the actual accumulative tally in the candidate columns. No such thing as reconciling the data in most races, the issue in Wayne Co., MI.
Put even more simply, the machines ensure the vote split is 5:3.
Biden is given 5/8ths of the votes and Trump gets 3/8ths.
I was wondering about the time involved to run all these ballots through – were they just coming up with stacks of paper marked Biden to try & get through an audit if it came to that? Is that your point – that they weren’t ever really counted because they couldn’t have been in that time? I don’t really have any idea how actual ballot counting works.
I think that the guy who runs the consulting firm shown at the following URL is one of her main “math guys”. He understands this stuff, and she knows him REALLY WELL and trusts him 🙂
https://www.wilsonbowdenpowell.com/
I’m guessing her son? Stepson? Nephew?
Son
I just hope her math guy can explain it as well.
sbell22blog, PLEASE offer your services, PLEASE: https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/
One doesn’t have to understand the numbers, per se. They just have to understand how the algorithm works which he explains with his diagram in the last few minutes. Understanding the basic method they used and you’ll understand the gist of how they did it.
I offered help with mathematical analysis, but have not yet received a reply.
Thanks. I’m sure they’re absolutely swamped. Pretty dang high stakes!!!
From you lips to God’s ears………….
Here’s a sequence of code from the NYT database, it appears to me to be a snippet of data transmitted from tabulating software to a hub or to the NYT database
Notably, it appears that they way they transmit votes is as a “total votes” number and then two fractional multipliers (‘percentages’ if you were to multiply each by 100)
Why?
If the purpose of the software is to “count” votes and store totals and subtotals, the only mathematical operation should be addition (summing)
Why the decimal fractions?
This entire operation of fractional “shares” is suspect and an invitation to – and vehicle for – fraud
All a fraudster has to do is monkey with the percentages (fraction ‘shares’)
Giving extra votes to Biden, you wouldn’t even need to check and modify the total votes number to ensure it still agrees
Why not ‘total’ votes sum, Trump votes sum, Biden votes sum, other candidates’ sums?
Doesn’t the title of the software have “share” or “shared” in it?
Now maybe this particular snippet is so that they can display percentages on the TV or website graphics, but those percentages can be computed post-summing
If unmolested vote sums are stored, kept, transmitted, etc, – where are they?
Let’s see ’em
I don’t see how we can trust any vote-counting software that’s doing anything other than counting = summing = addition, and addition only
Biden’s Great Leap Forward: A split second in Wisconsin
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/11/bidens_great_leap_forward_a_split_second_in_wisconsin.html
Even more basic, my understanding is that in the same NYT data you cite, it can clearly be seen that PDJT at times LOST votes.
If your counting votes, its all addition. How the F can either candidates vote total go DOWN?
ONLY one legitimate way; IF votes went thru the process, and so were “counted” by the machines,…and “x” # were LATER to be detirmined to be INvalid, THEN I could see going “back in” and subtracting votes.
And of coarse on election nite early a.m., NOBODY was challenging, much less invalidating votes.
Ergo, its FRAUD, and not very well done, either.
One realtime11.3 CNN (I think) counter actually showed Trump’s vote going down the exact same number Biden’s went up. A video went viral of that.
Yes.
What you missis that Biden’s and Trump’s decimal numbers do not add to 1.0.
The remainder numbers are votes given to the Libertarian candidate.
Votes that were frequently moved (laundered) right into the Biden column later
The answer is the Supreme Court. Thank God President Trump appointed three judges.
Yes, but my fear is that they will cave so they don’t appear to be ‘paying him back for their appointments’. Shades of Jeff Sessions, you know–Roberts is now a solid leftist who screwed over conservatives long before Trump-I suspect his ‘conversion’ has something to do with hatred of Trump, but more to do with something untoward the left has on him
then we fcking go to the next step of the fcking constitution, WHO THE FCK CARES what the supreme court says if they are traitors also!
you need to get back to reality! the supreme court IS NOT IN CHARGE OF YOU. they are equal branches. POTUS can tell them to go fck themselves. and the legislative branch ANSWERS TO US! and if they paid dominion to win their SEAT so they can overthrow the president HOLY FCK WHATS COMING is hell on earth for them.
I don’t blame you for spouting off…we’re all upset. BUT – what are we going to do if we can’t even vote them out???
Could be. But even those crooks know that no matter what Dems promise if they can stuff ballots and fix elections from now on there is zero chance we don’t 1) lose the country and 2) end up with them just court packing to create Marxist tribunals. As a matter of self preservation they might have to follow the law for a change.
–Now get them security because the domestic terrorists are roaming free
The idea of SCOTUS justices behaving that poorly, essentially bringing on civil war ‘just because…,’ is enough to keep one up at night.
So I don’t dwell on the thought, since it is so completely out of my realm of influence. PRAY.
If the conservative SCOTUS justices don’t crush the big steal, with the complicity of senate RINOs like milquetoasted mitt and susie collins, Beijing Biden will pack the SCOTUS full of commies, thereby destroying the independence of the court and trashing the republic.
The conservative SCOTUS justices are smart enough to see that if they don’t act to stop the biggest election fraud in history, the Republic is done for. The Dems don’t simply want “their turn” for 4 years at the controls; they plan to irredeemably dismantle this Country and there will be no saving it after that. This is all or nothing, and lawyers who have reached their exalted status have deep convictions about protecting this nation and the Constitution that is its foundation. They may be political animals but they also care deeply about this great nation and will not take kindly to its destruction by naked criminal ambition.
Also, a big part of the Dems’ plan to destroy the country is packing the court. None of the justices, even the liberal ones, like the idea of that.
No conversion was necessary.. Just another Bushie appointee.
And later payback from GW for candidate DT exposing his brother as a moron.
what if amy recuses herself from this since democrats are pouncing on her from day 1? That will be devastating to all of us.
oh HELL NO-
She won’t. Most judges don’t, and there’s nothing anybody can do about it if they don’t. I’m sure she’s quite confident in her ability to consider any case impartially, and I doubt that she spends any time at all worrying about what the Democrats think of her.
Please reach out to Sidney Powell if you can help the team with the data analysis. I know she visits treehouse (alho I imagine she is quite busy). I think Sundance has a connection to her, so email him is you can get involve.
Impressive resume you have – congrats!
I just donated to her legal fund as we need to stop this fraudulent election.
https://defendingtherepublic.org
Is this legit?
Absolutely. I have given plenty. Please help her. She will save the Presidency.
You can go through Sidney’s website, just as a confirmation. That is what I would do.
That site links from her site and back again absolutely legit I gave as much as I gave to the Trump campaign and if I can double it I will. If not NOW when?
wordpress wont allow me to see the original comment, so I assume you are asking if Powell’s donation site is legit. If so, yes.
She mentioned it in an interview that the campaign is not funding her work, just donations to this website. Then I triple check that the site was legit before I donated.
It is not just judges that are anti trumpers, it is that a lot of the rest don’t have the balls to do the right thing.
It isn’t the lack of ‘balls’ that keeps them from doing the right thing. Mrs. Powell says the Republicans have benefited too. Both sides WANT this system to continue because both sides make money from this fraud.
Both sides buy election assurance. And no, that’s not a typo. Powell called it insurance but it’s more than that. They pay money to Dominion to assure they win.
Both sides buy election assurance. And no, that’s not a typo. Powell called it insurance but it’s more than that. They pay money to Dominion to assure they win.
One only need to look at smaller races in Texas exposed by Veritas to see this.
If you have enough money to buy a federal election, you pay Dominion. If you don’t have enough money or are in a smaller race, you pay ballot harvesters.
The one exposed in Texas was doing it for both parties, to the tune of 6-7000 votes for one candidate.
Ballot box stuffing either way.
Hot potato in any jurisdiction. Needs to go on the fast track to SCOTUS.
Have you seen my comments about whole numbers? From what I can tell, every single one of the Trump:Total ratios is a whole number. ALL of them. Unless I’m missing something, that’s an even bigger deal than the “ratio transfers” between precincts.
What is the “trigger” for the updates to the Dominion system?
It appears the precincts are POLLED for updates and NOT generating updates on scheduled basis.
Very odd in these exhibits that several of these precincts overall tallies do not change over several hours on November 4…….
not even by ONE VOTE…
meaning voters in those precincts appear to have voted
ALL at the same time….
Maybe that is typical of urban precincts….
but where I come from…..our precinct had voters arriving ALL DAY.
I would not expect to see a tally that does not change over a 12 hour period.
I watched this earlier, it’s pretty fascinating.
Something beens bugging me though…
When Lin Wood filed his emergency lawsuit in Georgia to stop the certification of votes, it was denied due to lack of “standing”.
Think about this for a moment,
If Lin Woods’ case was accepted then it would be a drawn out case, therefore, I believe he purposefully filed this lawsuit knowing it lacked “standing”, why?
Lin said after this lawsuit was denied, he was filing a petition to the 11th circuit court of appeals and who oversees the 11th circuit when it comes to emergency appeals (the man who would love a little sweet revenge on the supposed president elect Joe Biden), Associate Justice Clarence Thomas.
Please tell me I’m wrong.
I’ve been thinking about the eventual showdown and the shameful history of Biden’s egregious behavior towards Justice Thomas-its delicious isn’t it?
God, I hope Justice Thomas gets his revenge…he surely deserves it
Ditto Kavanaugh and Senator knee-pads/VP pretender-
You bet,
Kavanaugh overseas Michigan.
“Oh happy day… oh happy day, when Jesus was“….?
Tee hee, sweet justice. Let it be
yep! they should have a good memory of the treatment. otherwise they are held hostage by something we need POTUS to show us!
where can you find out where they will be in charge of?
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/circuitassignments.aspx
God works in mysterious ways
(and probably a delicious sense of irony and humor too I’d guess)
As good as this sounds, lets hope revenge has nothing to do with the decision and that Thomas can look forward to applying the law of the land as it stands while enjoying the results of sweet justice.
indeed!
hear,hear.applying the law is what we want.if thomas gets payback in the process all the better.
Why does that remind me of the Mark Twain quote? Something like “I never wished death on anyone, but I’ve definitely read some obituaries with great pleasure.”
Okay, now that’s just weird. I was about to reply to VoteAll’s comment about Thomas getting revenge, and was gonna write simply “Delicious!” And what’s even weirder, I almost never use that term in that way. So you, Bocephus… get out of my head! 😀
The lawsuit brought in Dallas Co., TX, re election of 2018, was dismissed, also, for lack of standing, when filed on behalf of a voter. I read the decision, but gave up trying to follow the reasoning. Seems it may have needed to be filed on behalf of a candidate. Whether Lin Wood’s case suffers the same flaw, will take a good read…
Title…
https://outlook.live.com/mail/0/search/id/AQMkADAwATE2ZjAxLTI2OWQtNmI2Yy0wMAItMDAKAEYAAAOHBBTMU512Q5Iy%2B5TFf0nQBwBkenoAfzoxPEqYKvRQmJFxlwAAAgEMAAAAZHp6AH86MTxKmCr0UJiRcZcAA8TIeUQAAAA%3D/sxs/AQMkADAwATE2ZjAxLTI2OWQtNmI2Yy0wMAItMDAKAEYAAAOHBBTMU512Q5Iy%2B5TFf0nQBwBkenoAfzoxPEqYKvRQmJFxlwAAAgEMAAAAZHp6AH86MTxKmCr0UJiRcZcAA8TIeUQAAAABEgAQAHphJ8VF80ZHqukQYLsnFrQ%3D
Opinion…
https://outlook.live.com/mail/0/search/id/AQMkADAwATE2ZjAxLTI2OWQtNmI2Yy0wMAItMDAKAEYAAAOHBBTMU512Q5Iy%2B5TFf0nQBwBkenoAfzoxPEqYKvRQmJFxlwAAAgEMAAAAZHp6AH86MTxKmCr0UJiRcZcAA8TIeUQAAAA%3D/sxs/AQMkADAwATE2ZjAxLTI2OWQtNmI2Yy0wMAItMDAKAEYAAAOHBBTMU512Q5Iy%2B5TFf0nQBwBkenoAfzoxPEqYKvRQmJFxlwAAAgEMAAAAZHp6AH86MTxKmCr0UJiRcZcAA8TIeUQAAAABEgAQAJiMmAiPavpIs8VtdW%2Fbbbg%3D
Dissenting opinion…
https://outlook.live.com/mail/0/search/id/AQMkADAwATE2ZjAxLTI2OWQtNmI2Yy0wMAItMDAKAEYAAAOHBBTMU512Q5Iy%2B5TFf0nQBwBkenoAfzoxPEqYKvRQmJFxlwAAAgEMAAAAZHp6AH86MTxKmCr0UJiRcZcAA8TIeUQAAAA%3D/sxs/AQMkADAwATE2ZjAxLTI2OWQtNmI2Yy0wMAItMDAKAEYAAAOHBBTMU512Q5Iy%2B5TFf0nQBwBkenoAfzoxPEqYKvRQmJFxlwAAAgEMAAAAZHp6AH86MTxKmCr0UJiRcZcAA8TIeUQAAAABEgAQAAvNanVCQgACS46cccNU1op1
Wrong addresses, use these…
Title…
file:///Users/DParker/Downloads/05-20-00560-CV_Opinion%20Issued%20Letter_FILECOPY.pdf
Opinion…
file:///Users/DParker/Downloads/05-20-00560-CV_200560%20opinion-1.pdf
Dissenting Opinion…
file:///Users/DParker/Downloads/05-20-00560-CV_200560%20dissent%20op.pdf
My guess would be that the reason for dismissing suits filed by the average “voter” is that you could potentially have literally MILLIONS of such suits in any given election.
You are correct sir. We need to lose in the lower courts to get to the SC.
I believe the plan is for the SC to send all to the congress under the 12th amendment
Presidential vote in the House, VP vote in the Senate.
It’s been done before.
That’ll work, since we have an advantage in the House and Trump will win. But what if we didn’t? When if the Dems had the advantage? All it would accomplish is Trump would lose in the House instead of being cheated by Biden. That sure wouldn’t be “justice”, if that’s what the Supremes were looking for.
“Your sins shall find you out.” – Numbers 32:23
I know it doesn’t seem like it for politicians, but I assure you that mine can catch me easily.
Obviously, focusing on the fraud in this current election is most important, but, at some point we’ll need to look backwards at elections to see when any precincts and states began using Dominion and similar software and hardware.
There may be numerous elected officials who “won” their contests with this so-called “insurance” policy provided by Dominion, not to mention numerous ballot issues and referendums that simply should not be affecting our lives.
BLM Bogus Laws Matter !!!!
Using electronic voting systems came in after the Bush/Gore hanging chads debacle, overseen by Brenda Snipes.
I now wonder if the purpose wasn’t to overturn the results (for Gore) the purpose was to highlight to the American people the “deficiencies” of out “antiquated” voting system with a manufactured CRISES, which then justified massive spending of Federal dollars, for States to implement electronic systems.
In other words, CREATE a demand for the thing you WANT to implement.
never assign genius to simple manipulation.
for EVERY crisis, there are free riders both left and right (corruptors) who are invested directly in learning and exploiting loopholes.
the very first informative video I watched on data irregularities, I pondered why the authentication and verification and cert of dominion was so spotty and obviously so.
not a bug…it’s a feature.
we see this over and over
states create some “system” with built in flaws that the protected class can exploit..
congress does the very same thing.
it was always only a matter of time before the secret police spy powers would be used to influence elections..
it was always only a matter of time before election voting systems would be developed as a last line of OFFENSE to shudder any outsider not party to the president makers.
Dutchman, yes this could be.
During Bush vs. Gore, I was developing touch recognition algorithms for a major touchscreen manufacturer. At this time, touchscreen technology was being adopted for voting machines…pressure for more immediate results for the media and easier voter experience. I was very worried about this knowing how the firmware worked and could be corrupted. But I thought it was highly unlikely anyone would do such a thing. And now, we get printed ballots that verify the touchscreen machine output at least.
When Gore lost, the totals were in the margin of error for the various voting systems. Gore merely exploited this and confined his challange to friendly territory. But I believe the error rate of the touchscreen voting devices in the FL panhandle in Republican territory was greater than the chad situation in Broward, Co.
Think what pleasure if Cryin’ Chucky and Nazi Pillosi kept their seats because the votes were counted on a Dominion machine she owns part of! All the down-ballot people who lost the race will want a recount! How about Dominion is why we lost the House in 2018. And by the way, the Clinton Foundation is involved with Dominion, which makes it strange she lost in 2016.
I’m with you, Mel. In 2018 Orange County, CA, one of the most Republican regions in California, loses House seats to Democrats.
NOT A COINCIDENCE!
It wasn’t just due to ballot “harvesting.” There was a lot of “cooking” too.
I’m still stuck on what is perhaps the biggest fleece pulled over the American public’s eyes, Obama’s birth certificate, provided BY the White House, verified by TWO independent labs unknowingly working on the same analysis, BOTH concluding that certificate to be a FRAUD.
We’re living in a surreal existence… that can’t go on much longer.
I’ve never trusted elections in my state….CA. So this doesn’t surprise me that CA is one of the states that use Dominion. Even when some of the propositions that I’ve voted for have passed, the courts throw out the will of the people. CA is a mess.
What do you want to bet CA isn’t as blue as we thought.
I’m calling Oregon on Monday to ask if I can find out who they counted by vote for and if they can’t why not. Although, I pretty much think the west coast is an example of being too far gone to fix it. The ones in charge have zero desire to change us to something more transparent.
For sure. I live along the coast & you have some of those most brainwashed people on the face of the earth……………more money than good common sense. Lots of virtue signaling. I guess i never got the memo.
Working out an exit plan out of the state the best I can. It’s difficult with family so doing our best to make it work.
I’m in the same boat. My vote hasn’t counted in so long, I am always tempted to just not bother.
Can you ask for a recount in CA if you’re willing to pay for it? Because after this is over with, and Trump starts his 2nd term, I VERY MUCH want to know what the real vote was in CA. I have a feeling Trump came very close to winning… he may even have WON. I realize that the cost of such a recount would be huge, but I can guarantee we could fundraise the money in a matter of hours.
EO
Computerized tabulation is prohibited for national election tallies.
You’re welcome
Everyone is looking at the Trump, Biden switch, but no one is looking at the third party switch to Biden. They have complained that their votes were down by a lot. They need to come onboard with this, and Dominion employees need to be bought in for questioning
Yup. and over at GWP, libertarian says the tell is the libertarians weren’t voting much this year but sure enough the Dominion guys are pushing votes to them to push to Biden.
Here is a comment I found in response to this guy’s video:
‘It makes sense why the Dominion people skipped their hearing today in PA after watching your video and why they lawyered up! You just proved through numerical logic that the software was pre programmed to give Biden the win through pre programmable votes that make sure Biden won. I’m guessing whoever came up with the sequence thought they were being clever, but they did not account for people like you and others on TD.W tearing apart the time stamps and data and finding the ratios that will never happen in real life unless they are manipulated by an outside source. It’s like in chemistry when you know your titrations are going to be off so you manipulate the numbers to be what they should be so you get an A on the titration experiment. You make the outcome fall in your favor so you win!’
I really believe Sydney Powell’s work is the key to 4 more years of Trump. Dominion is pure fraud. Fraud vitiates everything.
They might lack the money needed to challenge this. Too bad they can’t make Dominion pay for their legal fees here.
Dominion employees flew the coup and the company moved their offices, which is their history. They change their name and their location whenever the heat gets too hot. At the last minute they blew off an appointment they had with Trump’s Legal Team
At hearing on Aug 15, 2015 the RINO/CFR Ricky Perry appointed SoS and appointed director of elections were given proof of Hart InterCivic and Election Systems & Software vote rigging machines. RINOs Abbott, Patrick and Paxton have known about this treason since 2016, as Sidney Powell said, “fraud includes democrats and republicans”
Per Russ Ramsland “Interview on Electronic Vote Fraud” by CD Media > on Oct 14, 2020 Harris County flipped 250,000 votes to DNC. Statewide likely a million popular votes flipped to unpopular puppet, along with a dozen seats in US House and state races. IMPEACH vote fraud enablers.
https://youtu.be/ficae6x1Q5A
“This video is age-restricted and only available on YouTube.”
Yes-not willing to put in my identifying information to watch a video.
LOL ~ have noticed that SKYNETgoogle does that to make it more difficult (almost impossible) for a video to go viral. They place a phony age-restricted label on it. Consider it a form of soft censorship.
Need more than any “indication” to break thru the opposition forces.
Need some hard proof.
And very soon.
And in particular how the dems backfilled the votes to match the computer adjustments.
Did they though? If you do the audit by ballots per precinct I’d bet they don’t match. Just doing a massive recount will get you the total, MAYBE, but if they do it by precinct in a true audit I’d bet they don’t match at all.
And if they somehow pulled it off then let’s see the images from the machine that they capture with each scan. I’d bet forensics of the photos would show multiple identical scans. They could have back filled fake ballots later. It’s been two weeks and if we haven’t been spying on the precincts every day then that’s how you do it. Get a clean look at the actual ballots.
Oh and btw it still doesn’t explain precincts that had 3600% turnout. Which lends credence to the idea that may have backfilled ballots but not evenly through precincts.
Agreed. I was a bit brief in my comment because I was replying to the message above.
What we know is that they back filled well enough to survive a simple recount. I’d have been really surprised if they hadn’t.
My question is the same as yours. How did they carry out the back filling. I would expect the bad guys to have made the omelette as unscramblable as they could. But as they say in the criminal investigation profession every touch leaves a trace.
This is a “number crunching” exorcise…something that “once told how or when to do it, and where to “get” and/or “deposit” the results” can be handled by any computer without direct human “input”…
ie: once “set” someplace, it then follows coded instructions on auto pilot.
There is an article on the web now, with a picture of some “computer code” saying they discovered the “smoking gun” within the machines’ instructions / code… Maybe these two groups of geeks need to get together and compare notes…
This “down in the weeds” type of evidence needs the deft touch of a “technical instructor” use to teaching oil patch trash highly technical subjects like Well Control calculations; when, they can’t even sign their own name on the driller’s book…. Hat Tip to all those wonderful South LA hands!
Maybe the next demonstration we hold should have a case or two of frags busted open and passed around for effect… I’m really feeling like some ‘ol buzzard sitting on a branch….Patience my butt – I’m a-gonna’ go kill something…. /sic.
MoMel. I see you more like an old wise owl…..love your style.
Listening from 46:25 to 48:50 gives you a good summary of his work.
I keep thinking back to Rep. Frederica Wilson from Florida complaining about the Biden Campaign not giving her money to help him win in Florida. (in other words pay off people for votes) Biden lost in Miami Dade by more than Hillary Clinton in 2016. Frederica Wilson said she had “skilled operatives” who excel at turnout, but maybe they were really “skilled operatives” in fixing votes and hacking machines.
I was just wondering about her. I guess we are still graced by her presence. Too bad.
I think Mad Max lost her seat, sorry I don’t know how to confirm that,
This is old news. We already know about vote flipping orchestrated in Germany by the CIA.
We are waiting for the Republican Party take a stand. Win or Lose, we need to document the official position of the Republican Party. The silence is deafening!
Professor;
“Delta dawn, whats that flower you have on,
Could it be a faded rose from days gone by?
And did I hear ya say, he was ameetin you here today, to take you to his mansion in the sky?”
Point being, the waiting for the Republicons in Congress, especially the Senate, passed a LONG TIME AGO.
By action and inaction, words spoken and more importantly NOT spoken, they have made their allegience clear.
And it ain’t PDJT, and it ain’t US. THEY are the enemy, and to consider WAITING to hear from them, is as pitiful as poor Delta, waiting for a lover who blew her off, many years ago.
McConnell appointed, er agreed to confirm Barr. And thats really all I needed to know, in order to be confident that Barr/Durham was a head fake.
McConnell is the dark, twisted heart of the resistance.
Notice how the Republicons in the Senate can consistently blow off the concerns of the base? Things like not repealing Obummercare when they had the chance, or Lindsey working WITH the same Dems he had excorciated two weeks earlier, to craft a National Red Letter law?
They havevignored us, because they KNEW they would win reelection, whether we voted for them, or not.
I read it several times. Thanks for bringing me back to reality in a nice way. Always a Patriot; never a Republican!
And with respect to Lindsey, I held my nose and voted for him. I thought the Senate race in SC would be close, and his opponent was a socialist lobbyist. I will never make that mistake again, if we ever have another election that is not rigged.
Professor: Same here in Maine. I and a lot of others would not have voted for Susan Collins except we wanted Trump to have a Republican controlled Senate. She basically owes her re-election to Trump supporters who held their nose and voted for her for this reason. And her way of showing thanks? She’s already saying Biden should be getting security briefings. While Lindsey is fist-bumping Kamala. These people are true lowlifes.
Same with Lindsey. He is in the full socialist ass-kissing mode right. He has six more years of free relaxation to look forward to.
“He has six more years of free relaxation to look forward to.”
Maybe.
Maybe not.
Luke 12:19-20 KJV
And I will say to my soul, Soul, thou hast much goods laid up for many years; take thine ease, eat, drink, and be merry. [20] But God said unto him, Thou fool, this night thy soul shall be required of thee: then whose shall those things be, which thou hast provided?
If they’re rigging elections then they don’t need all that money they’re begging for CONSTANTLY on my cell phone. It’s not like I’ll ever give enough to actually merit their attention,
I think the GOP can’t wait to get rid of our President – they figure we’ll get over it because in their opinion what choice do we have. If Biden gets in they may be right – I foresee a point from which we can’t return without a full scale revolution.
Can someone explain this in some more simplistic terms.
I feel like I have an idea of how this works but maybe I’m still missing this.
Also why were they using fractions as opposed to whole numbers?
IMHO It’s way to convoluted as a theory.. would not pass muster in a court room..
Too many tweeks that are inconsistent..that’s why it is hard to follow..
Like 2+2 =4 is the same as 2+3=4 4 votes biden one vote for third party ..
Don’t get me wrong I’m glad he’s trying to figure this out.. but this explanation does not fit.
MAGA
Are you a lawyer?
Patchman2076, for every Biden vote that is worth 75%, Trumps votes are worth 25%, for instance. The Algorithm has to end up at 100%of the people allowed to vote.
That makes sense when you factor in Trump losing votes.
If what the lawyers are saying is true the president was getting too many votes and for there little plan to work they would’ve had to steal some votes from him because than you would have way too many people voting.
How clever these little turds were.
Abd about those “missing” flash drives…..
This is an angle I hope the PDJT legal team is also looking at.
https://twitter.com/SharylAttkisson/status/1330192067507654661
Treepers
My state, NH, went Bye Done by 50K “votes”.
Hildebeast won by 2000 votes here in ’16.
I know Democrats and non voters who voted for PDJT this election. It’s anecdotal, but many friends report the same phenomenon.
There is no F’ing way PDJT lost NH by 50k votes. The fact that the Sec of State, NH AG, and US attorney are not looking at this is more evidence of the corruption in NH.
Is there any scenario where each state would be required to conduct a full audit of their election totals?
One can take a look at the state figures on Excel and know that Trump
– did not lose every ward in Manchester and Nashua, most of them decisively (44% of the vote and less)
-got 26% of the vote in Portsmouth
-gets a significantly smaller percentage of votes in the larger city and town votes of Concord and Keene is comparison to their respective counties.
Very peculiar
If the democrats continue with their sneaky election heist
and they crash the system . . . it won’t end well for them.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8r4_2tLnSNI
I wanted to understand this, but he used too many vague terms. Is the “ratio” the “major ratio” in the right column he stopped pointing to? Is it the running total ratio or the ratio of each vote release? Then why did he say that a ratio “held”? And why say the ratio “transferred”? That’s confusing.
Basically a uniform vote pattern started in one set of precincts and then transitioned to another set of precincts. It is statistically impossible for a uniform pattern to transfer within a system and identical voting patterns to rotate in precincts like that.
Random vote tallies would not behave that way.
It’s convoluted… it’s is highly improbable that the same vote ration occurred over consecutive reporting period…
Stop the argument there… transferring to other precincts confuses the issue on how that could be programmed or orchestrated in real time.. thousands of precincts individual choices …not likely..
think there was too much focus on the ratio – how do the same precincts report the exact same number of votes and ratio multiple times over an hour or longer period.
Then you have multiple precincts (up to 5 in his video) reporting the same vote totals and same ratio at the exact same times?
Why would say precinct 01-02 report a vote total of 336 multiple times where the split is exactly 237-80 at the exact time 4 other precincts report repeated results. The ratio ‘transfer’ may be a big part of it, but the same vote totals repeated multiple times from multiple precincts at the same timestamp is hella fraudulent
colors may not be the best but highlighting how the same precincts report same numbers over and over all at the same time.
However, the ratios rotate, and around the same time of day. And within a few minutes.
Nothing random about any of that.
Cmon, a random lefty did random things to get non-random cycles.
See, it’s random. You just have to look at it the right way. Don’t worry the MSM is looking for “experts” to explain this for all of us.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
My assumption is that they are the same numbers because they were not updated (not increased) so this is just a running total….only if the numbers changed would they be updated.
Wait a minute…I’ve seen this before…
Love this movie!
Tats how I explained it to my wife!!! Lol.
I said- the Dems pulled the office space scam but with votes not pennies.
The thing I have really enjoyed the last couple of weeks is seeing the number of computer “geeks” out there taking the time to expose the fraud. It has been really interesting and challenging to comprehend. One of the biggest blessings from Donald Trump is the fight that he has instilled in the Patriots. Thank you to all who are using your skills and taking the time to find the fraud and expose it.
yea – shows smart people dont vote for biden.
Chicago and suburban Cook County switched to Dominion this year. Just sayin’….
Does anyone know what criteria Dominion requires a county to meet in order to be labeled one of “THE TOP COUNTIES” by them? Also, which counties are assigned that label?
Wouldn’t the key to this be to have the source code for the dominion software?
Analysts should be able to find any program within dominion that would trigger this formula.
And if it is not within the dominion softwae, then wouldn’t that mean the ballot data would need to be sent off somewhere, “adjusted” then sent back to the machine? Which a program for that should be in the source code. I highly doubt anyone running these polling stations would know any adustments they would need to make on the fly.
I’m just wondering how they would be able to hide this in the source code.
actually think this is not in the dominion machines but in the election update reporting software which in some cases is separate, Scytl is one outfit and it is based in Spain.
I agree with others in this area – Election source code should be open source so that anyone can peek under the cover to see what is going on. Software should go through a review period and all machines should clearly present the SAME source code version to the voter, which should be widely published through the media/campaigns. If the source code version isn’t presented or is different than publicly agreed to – the election official for that precinct/Locality/state should face fines and prison time.
Varying machines can be developed to run the source code, but they should all be required to run the SAME source code nationally in any national (federal) elections.
Sidney Powell did say, earlier in the week, she does have the Source Code, and the USA did seize the Servers from Germany. Rudy has over a thousand affidavits, signed under oath, from witnesses to skullduggery that was taking place during the Election. For instance workers were told to do something that a person knew was illegal, etc.. He had them at the Thursday Press Conference and one of the people (Whistle blowers, actually)allowed him to use her name and put the affidavit on display so the press could view it and know the proof was truth, still the press went out of that hour and a half demonstration saying there was no proof of wrong-doing.
I think the fraudsters were adding votes to biden in the partial results that were reported every few minutes.
I think the purpose was to give the impression that the vote count was going biden’s way from the start.
I think some of the strange statistical results here is a result of the algorithm they used to add votes to biden.
I also think the electronic vote switching was only temporary. To give plausible partial count results. The Georgia recount showed that they created paper ballots to match the fraudulent totals. (which is why i think the vote switching was temporary)
I think there was fraudulent paper ballots with a big dump at the end. But they wanted the partial counts to look plausible. (if you do a big dump for Biden and turn off the temporary switching at the same time, it will look like Trump got quite a few votes in the big dump at the end)
In any case, Trump did better than expected so they still had to do huge one sided dumps of biden votes in all these states anyway.
I think I agree, or something similar. That would suggest there’s some feedback messaging telling the ‘troops’ how many more ballots need to be counted. After they determine how many votes need to be made up, the algorithm needs time and uncounted ballots. Maybe that’s why Michigan’s Secretary of State was ‘Johnny on the spot’ sending out mail-in ballot applications to every Michigander and then some, while Covid was still ramping up (Michigan is never so coordinated, and it wasn’t her job anyway). Also why she said beforehand we should consider it to be an election week and not an election day.
Now that people are onto them, they deleted the data files –
https://twitter.com/kylenabecker/status/1330256760851066890
This is a good thread with lots of info.
You don’t delete your “open voting database” if you aren’t vile lying scum with everything to hide.
Same in Georgia. Shredding mail in ballot envelopes? In the middle of a contested election?! Well, that doesn’t scream “Guilty!!” at all …
You certainly would shred the envelopes if you were a corrupt weasel who just certified a fraudulent election.
“Hey, these are the certified numbers after our recount and “audit”, wink, wink. We didn’t need the envelopes anymore so we shredded them.”
“Signature matching you say? Sorry, those envelopes are gone. Besides, we have the certified numbers now.”
This makes perfect sense. He was a very good teacher. I have full confidence that the SC Justices would follow these explanations.
It won’t matter that GA SoS Ratberger shredded the hardcopy ballots. The software tampering invalidates the election regardless, but I’m sure there’s a charge he could go to jail for & Kemp.
Pass the popcorn, please.
https://imgflip.com/gif/1weds3
[…] Unusual Pattern and Ratio Within Philadelphia Ballot Data Indicates Dominion Software Manipulation o… […]
okay I like Numbers and I like to play with my database I watched but I didnt get how this shows anything???? stick with me a second
no change in a precincts numbers until reporting NOT just ratios no changes in the votes. When the machines report Precinct (A) who had a 15 to 1 ratio now has a 20 to one ratio. precinct (B) who had a 12 to 1 ratio now has a a 15 to 1 ratio. Now Precinct (A) no longer has a 15-1 ratio.
why are we assuming a transfer? couldn’t this just be shifts in voting pattern for whatever random events happen in a day? the long rows of number of each precinct are unchanged until the next batch of votes comes in and then there are new ratios probably each and every time. If you sort by ratios and times as this guy did you would get these results everywhere every time i would think.
to me all this shows is a change in ratios as each batch of votes came in.
Did I miss something??
I know there was fraud but i dont see how this demonstrates it.
I was thinking that too, if you have 90000+ records and sort by vote ratio and then time you are going to get something.
What is bizarre is that eg 3 precincts with 48:1 ratio change to something else and then two others spring up 48:1 within a few minutes – not randomly spaced in the 16 hours of the day.
but if all, or many, of the precincts are updated around the same time, you’ll get the new ratios within a short period of time. I agree with trialbytruth.
What are the odds of 48 votes for Biden for every 1 vote for Trump in 2 precincts?
Probably pretty good.
Now, what are the odds of that 48 to 1 ratio being the same in 3-4 precincts in the morning, then the same ratio found in 3 different precincts in the afternoon? And then 3 different precincts that evening? Impossible.
I can’t pretend to understand it, am in awe of those who can figure it out. It’s truly a blessing that PDJT has people with these skills fighting on his side.
what is missing is what did they switch to… i mean if they switched to 45:1 or from 45:1 it would be meaningless if it was 3:1 it would be earth shattering. Again we don t know. all we have is a sort based on ratio 1st then time 2nd
i see that penn was going to certify election results.if so is this what PT wants.if just one vote is found to be fraud then they should all be thrown out.do that in wi,mi,pa and ga and neither candidate can get to 270.send it to the house where every state gets one vote
I’ve said before that if you want to find out where the fraud would occur in PA, look no further than the six counties where Herr Wolf extended the date for voting during the primaries:
“The governor said he would give the six counties up to seven days beyond Tuesday’s primary to turn in the mail-in ballots. The six counties are Allegheny, Dauphin, Delaware, Erie, Montgomery and Philadelphia counties.”
It was kind of a trial run for how they would work their magic with VBM. So this story comes as no suprise to me.
https://www.revolver.news/2020/11/explosive-new-data-from-rigorous-statistical-analysis-points-to-voter-fraud-in-montgomery-county-pa/
Montgomery and Deleware counties are basically subsidiaries of the Philly political machine now.
Article –
https://twitter.com/KMCRadio/status/1330257511509790720
What if? Gov of Georgia and the SoS of Georgia used the machines to take the election from Abrams ? She had the machine to take the election and lost. So not the Gov and SoS are not helping?
Complicated. 98% of this country will not understand this at all. I’m a Nuke Engineer with advanced calc experience and tbis is hard to follow.
Stats are a pain. This will be the hard part- getting people to understand.
I can watch and listen 3 or 4 times and see the patterns. I just keep trying to picture using this video to ‘prove’ a stolen election to people who insist masks work to prevent Covid.
Well, Annie, my comment may be a day late and a dollar short but that’s what happens when people let the statists dumb down our education system.
In one of our elementary schools where I live int the gym, there is a big mural of the world with different color hands all touching it says:
Unity Togetherness and Love (or similar words). It’s the schools mission, it’s why it was painted.
I remember asking the Principal when my youngest was going there- What is that about? She said, our goals is to ensure these kids know how to be accepting and loving.
I remember saying- no, your job is to teach reading, writing, and arithmetic. The things you mention are for the parents- not you. She said, well, some kids are not being taught properly at home and we need to fill the gap.
NO NO NO NO you statist heathen- your job is to teach math, science, writing, and reading.
This is our root cause.
Exactly. Why don’t they focus more on the fact that the US election votes were being tallied outside the US by a company that is owned by foreign groups/individuals who are our adversaries? Maybe that’s not direct proof of fraud but it may be a more effective way to keep people engaged. The court has to be persuaded by the preponderance of evidence, but the rest of the country needs to remain pissed off and keep demanding answers.
Cliff notes version ,they did not do the fraud wide spread ,they did it big in some areas ,but not for long, then moved on to other districts . Anyone looking at a district would notice that distribution of votes if it ran all.day. They hit it hard ,quick and moved on to the next mark.
Like locusts. Once they ate enough ballots in one precinct, they moved on to the next and so on until they had their fill.
I understand what they did. I am a smart man and following along at first was confusing but then I caught on. There are too many in our country who can’t even tie their shoes or write their own name at the age 30. They are not understanding this.
I watched the video, he has a point but he should work on presentation, a spreadsheet is not the most understandable to bring across a point.
I think I understand the concept: The re-occurence of fixed ratios across pricincts indicate a bucketing algorithm. If you map this to the real world: If the ratio for my precinct is 60% biden / 40% trump, then when I go to vote I cannot go into the office immediately.
I queue up outside the door and then I have to wait for 3 other Trump voters and 6 biden voters.
When our group is complete we all go in and do our votes and then that batch of 10 votes gets submitted.
The algorithm gets into play when there’s not necessarily such an ideal distribution. 10 trump voters enter and 6 are switched to Biden. The software tries to mold the votes according to the ratio that its set to preserve.
You never know how the software calculates the ratio, we are always outsiders lookign into the system like a black box. But we can say for sure that with these patterns it was not 1 person = 1 vote. But that there was some kind of algorithm. The presence and activation of the algorithm is already a violation of the constition.
If its not tallying 1 person = 1 vote then it becmes “We Dominion the Algorithm” and not “We the People” that elects. And that is not what was written in the constitution.
I don’t understand.
Today I read this:
“In a sworn declaration, a respected mathematician says his analysis of election data and phone interviews with Pennsylvania voters raises questions about as many as 100,000 absentee ballots requested in the key battleground state where President Trump and Joe Biden are separated by just about 82,000 votes.
Williams College Professor Steven Miller, a Yale and Princeton trained math expert, said he analyzed Pennsylvania ballot data…”
https://bayourenaissanceman.blogspot.com/2020/11/about-electoral-fraud-in-pennsylvania.html
Then just now I heard from a friend in Florida that a judge in Pennsylvania has dismissed the lawsuit(s) brought by the Trump team.
Then, still outstanding is my question concerning how the 14th Amendment (probably Section 2 thereof) is being used as basis for a judge, or judges, to dismiss lawsuits brought by the Trump team.
You have to realize there are multiple lawsuits on multiple fronts.
What the judge dismissed (best my knowledge) was the eligibility of Equal Protection. This had to do with some Democrat focused counties allowing Democrats to cure ballots and republican counties to NOT cure ballots.
This is arguied to be (and pretty much is) a violation of equal protection rights. If a democrat can cure a ballot so should a republican. A democrat vote does not weigh heavier than a republican vote.
I understand both sides are using the Equal Protection clause.
President Trump to argue the voices of voters are being drowned out by fraudulent votes.
Creepy Joe to argue for the lawsuits to move forward would mean disenfranchisement if voters.
All I can figure is the judge(s) ignore or otherwise fail to make the distinction between legitimate and illegitimate votes.
The whole “franchisement” is just wordplay
Illegal votes are never “franchised” to begin with so its impossible to disinfranchise an illegal vote. They are votes cast without valid chain of custody, so they should have been thrown out to begin with.
The only disinfranchisement that can be done is to the _legitimate_ democrat and trump voters who went to the poll thinking their vote would make a difference (1 person = 1 vote)
Now the question of how can we put the toothpaste back in the tube and judges not wanting to deal with that question, thats a different question. That would take some cahones as Bannon mentions. Also you wouldnt go against the person who draws your paycheck and lower in the chain peoples paycheck sources vary?
The other side is riding this same roller coaster, but is soothed now and then by Benjamin Wittes , of Law Fare fame, promising his huge following that he has insider information and the whole ruckus will end in the “January Mental Meltdown of Donald J, Trump”. They are slathering him with gratitude for saving them from certain despair, on his Blog.
I’m reposting this again with added text because Guiliani confirmed what’s been bothering me.
Who oversees Emergency Appeals in the 3rd circuit? Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr.
VoteAllIncumbantsOut says:
November 21, 2020 at 6:12 pm
I watched this earlier, it’s pretty fascinating.
Something beens bugging me though…
When Lin Wood filed his emergency lawsuit in Georgia to stop the certification of votes, it was denied due to lack of “standing”.
Think about this for a moment,
If Lin Woods’ case was accepted then it would be a drawn out case, therefore, I believe he purposefully filed this lawsuit knowing it lacked “standing”, why?
Lin said after this lawsuit was denied, he was filing a petition to the 11th circuit court of appeals and who oversees the 11th circuit when it comes to emergency appeals (the man who would love a little sweet revenge on the supposed president elect Joe Biden), Associate Justice Clarence Thomas.
Please tell me I’m wrong.
“Today’s decision turns out to help us in our strategy to get expeditiously to the US Supreme Court. Although we fully disagree with this opinion, we’re thankful to the Obama-appointed judge for making this anticipated decision quickly, rather than simply trying to run out the clock,” Rudy Giuliani, Attorney to Trump and Jenna Ellis, Senior Legal Advisor to Trump 2020 Campaign wrote.
Giuliani and Ellis said they will be seeking an expedited appeal to the Third Circuit.
“There is so much evidence that in Pennsylvania, Democrats eliminated our opportunity to present 50 witnesses and other evidence that election officials blatantly ignored Pennsylvania’s law denying independent review. This resulted in 682,777 ballots being cast illegally, wittingly or unwittingly. This is just an extension of Big Tech, Big Media, Corrupt Democrat censorship of damning facts the American public needs to know.
“We are disappointed we did not at least get the opportunity to present our evidence at a hearing. Unfortunately the censorship continues. We hope that the Third Circuit will be as gracious as Judge Brann in deciding our appeal one way or the other as expeditiously as possible. This is another case that appears to be moving quickly to the United States Supreme Court.”
Agree 100%. I posted something similar in the Sekulow thread.
Move through the lower courts as quickly as possible to get to the top – the Supreme Court.
This has always been the strategy. PDJT stated as such election night and Rudy re-confirmed it today.
** Trump doesn’t need to prove indisputable ‘fraud’ **
Maybe I am missing something, but all Trump has to do in court is prove the returns show impossible probabilities of all the returns. They have a zillion ways to show that the data doesn’t show a legitimate vote count.
The most obvious being the turnout in precincts over 100%.
They don’t have to then further prove that it was “intentional fraud’ and who was behind it. They just have to show the election results as presented are obviously not real.
The court can then make the proper decision about the election results having been manipulated. They don’t have to determine whether it was a ‘glitch’ or bad code or hacking. And team Trump doesn’t have to prove who exactly did it and how, they just need the court to recognize the count is illigitimate.
— once they’ve won this decision, the entire country will know why. Because of Democrat fraud.
That’s why Team Trump is selling us on Fraud in public and in individual state lawsuits. But those are all separate and parallel battles keeping the media and democrat lawyers busy and defensive.
The key to this case is that the election night returns (which are publicly available information) were impossible. That is indisputable. And they don’t need to prove intentional fraud to show the math doesn’t add up.
Add to that the chain of custody issues and established election law not being followed and state courts and officials overriding election law as enacted by the legislatures.
Bev Harris at Black Box Voting shows how a significant type of fraud is done.
https://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-video/
Sidney expressly warned states to not certify fraudulent election results. GA’s CYA Kemp, Raffensberger and legislature collectively flipped her off. It will not end well for them. Nice try at straddling the fence, Kemp, but it’s too late.