A few days ago Bloomberg published a poll of 2,001 registered voters containing a sub-set of 945 voters considered “investors” in the financial markets (full pdf below).
From those voters who are also financial investors the results showed a 50% favorability for Donald Trump, and a 33% favorability for Hillary Clinton.  Not only do voters trust Trump more with their personal and family safety, they also trust Donald Trump more with their personal and family finances:

(Bloomberg)  More voters with a stake in the stock market say Donald Trump would be better as president for their portfolios than Hillary Clinton, with about one in four saying they’ll alter their asset mix if the Republican is elected and a similar share saying they’d do so if the Democrat wins.
A Bloomberg/Morning Consult national poll on investment, tax and economic issues shows voters with money in the market pick Trump over Clinton, 50 percent to 33 percent, as the person they think will be better for their portfolio. Those with more than $50,000 invested answer the question almost identically as smaller investors.

[…]  Nearly six in 10 registered voters say a recession is very or somewhat likely during the next four years, while only a quarter think it’s not too likely or not likely at all.
If a recession hits during the next presidency, 45 percent of registered voters say Trump would be better at dealing with the situation, while 36 percent pick Clinton.  (read more)

Here’s The Full Poll Data:

[scribd id=316660472 key=key-w5AaIFGLjR547XtGCRpD mode=scroll]
It should be noted today how visibly absent Hillary Clinton is from the campaign trail and political discussion.  Yes, most certainly her entire team is poll-testing every word she might make as to the outcome of the UK/EU referendum; but it’s actually more than just that.
As we previously mentioned (several times), a Brexit result would mean the Clinton camp would have to shift their entire election campaign approach.
Hillary Clinton is the visible personification of a globalist; even the name of her foundation is the “Clinton Global Initiative”.  See the problem?
A nationalist/populist uprising against the institutional political systems represented by noted globalist Hillary – means she has to modify her entire approach.
The Brexit outcome will even change the ranking and perceived value of her vice-president.  Every approach Clinton takes is political, poll-tested, and dependent on what’s going to get her elected.

Just yesterday – Hank ‘Bailout’ Paulson, George Bush’s Treasury Secretary, endorsed Hillary Clinton.  She can’t avoid the connections to the Global Elite.