When we begin to research the facts of controversial issues we eventually find the deconstruction of a false media narrative, and exposing how the media manipulates public opinion of events, ultimately becomes the purpose of our research more than anything else.

In case we have not said it clearly enough, allow me to repeat. We hold no opinion as to the Walter Scott shooting itself. These threads are to get to the FACTS of who, what, when and where; leading toward discussion of the possibilities inherent in the “why”.

You know, what the Fourth Estate used to do…

It is not a consequence of whether Michael Slager was right or wrong. Nor a matter of whether anyone “deserved” anything, or if anything was “justified”.

Just a simple search for the truth. The truth that has no agenda nor disposition toward anyone’s opinion of it.

All of that said, you’d have to be blind to the events of the past 5 years regarding controversial violent encounters (Trayvon Martin, Mike Brown, Tony Robinson, etc) and the inherent manipulation of the details therein, not to notice that some evidence is released and some similar evidence brutally missing, for an very intentional purpose.

The South Carolina Walter Scott shooting -by Police Officer Michael Slager- is absolutely filled with intentionally missing elements in an effort by ALL INTERESTED PARTIES to sell a narrative useful for their purposes.

What does that mean? It means this is not just a legal issue; it means the shooting is being manipulated for a political benefit; it means the substance in the media reports are there to sell a purposeful narrative from one singular perspective.

EXAMPLE: All of the police officers initial incident reports have been released, except Officer Slager.

[scribd id=261521981 key=key-indMoeuYUPM4E7fLCHFT mode=scroll]

Why omit Officer Slager’s statement?

Perhaps missing because that only way the narrative sellers can claim discrepancies, ie. “lies” in the Slager report.  That’s how you embed a belief in the public when the truth is divergent. Promote the lie, hide the inconvenient truth.  Then, eventually, when the truth comes out, the lie has already embedded – “Hands Up, Don’t Shoot”…

This is a very successful approach at necessary enemy creation; in this case Officer Slager.  In order to focus the attention of the mob you need to first identify a target.  For this event the mob did not need media scouts driving hours to find a mom and pop pizza shop that doesn’t cater to gays.

Generally the media will only/can only report on data presented to them.  The data presenter, South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED), which, despite its rather LEO sounding name, is, in actuality, a political element of the South Carolina Solicitor General Scarlett A Wilson whose history does not show she -or her office- supports police officers.

Initial review shows Scarlett A Wilson, has a very similar disposition/outlook and political world view to Jacksonville Special Prosecutor Angela Corey (Zimmerman case).

Imagine if Zimmerman’s prosecutor was a State Attorney General – yeah, now you begin to see the problem.  The information is released which supports your ideology/motive, and the information retained is that which does not support your ideology/motive.

The initial optics behind the Walter Scott shooting looked horrible. To avoid a Ferguson 2.0 they quickly put Officer Slager on the chopping block as the ultimate tamp down approach.

Exceptional political expediency!  The problem is they now have to retain that original approach despite the evidence which doesn’t support it. Ergo, you hide the Officer Slager incident report.

This is also why the “passenger” witness is going to be kept away from the media and in a secret hold. The embed of the narratives needs time to cure in place, anything which is adverse to those narratives will, until forced forward, remain out of view.

From what we can initially find quite the opposite is true regarding Officer Slager’s report.

There is nothing false within the report he wrote as far as we can tell from the releases of its supposed content by those talking about it.  Elements:

♦ Car stop, two people, Walter Scott and a passenger.
♦ Suspect Scott runs during check of his ID.
♦ Foot chase – Suspect Scott running from police.
♦ Suspect Scott would not comply with demands to halt.
♦ Officer Slager catches up with Suspect Scott.
♦ Suspect Scott refuses to comply with Officer instructions.
♦ Suspect Scott attacks police officer Slager.
♦ Officer Slager attempts to use his Taser.
♦ Suspect Scott struggles with officer for Taser being deployed.
♦ Suspect Scott and Officer Slager in physical struggle (almost 2 minutes).
♦ Suspect Scott takes custody of Taser from Slager during struggle.
♦ Suspect Scott gains upper hand – Runs from Officer Slager.
♦ Officer Slager shoots violent fleeing felon.

*Note* You generally can’t shoot a “fleeing” felon in the front if they are running away from you.

IF this is the essential script of Officer Michael Slager – there is nothing in any witness statement, nothing on video, nothing currently in the known outline of events which factually disputes this version. To the contrary, dash-cam video, eye-witness (Gwen Nichols “tussle”), and video by Feidin Santana, all match this script. (*If this is roughly Officer Slager’s version)

In order to sell a narrative more favorable to what the media prefers selling – anything which supports this Slager outline must be played down, and anything which disputes this Slager outline must be played up.

Where is the passenger? Under the control of the Scheme Team of Ryan Julison and Walter Scott family lawyers – of course.

The passenger has an attorney named Mike Peper. Mike Peper is son of Warren Peper who is a media politico in SC. Who is paying for Mike Peper? Most likely, the Scheme Team.

Already we know video witness Feidin Santana is represented by Ben Crump’s fellow traveler Todd Rutherford. All of these “witnesses” and “key players” have lawyers provided by the construct of the Black Grievance Industry, the Scheme Team and Ryan Julison.

What are the details behind this mystery car purchase; with new wheels put on by Walter Scott, that has no paperwork, and was supposedly sold to him by a neighbor, that’s also mysteriously *missing* from the current narrative?

The only information you will see from the MSM and political benefactors is going to be information that supports one side of this narrative; the side of the Walter Scott family, BGI and State Solicitor Scarlett A Wilson. Everything else you are going to have to go out and find yourself.

• Have you seen Officer Slager’s report?
• Have you heard the radio calls made by Officer Slager?
• Have you heard the radio traffic from the responding officers who were trying to aid an officer in a fight with a suspect?
• Have you heard from the passenger?
• Have you heard from the mysterious “car selling” neighbor?

Of course not, because these facts don’t support the goal.  They have a narrative which needs time to embed.  Then, if the facts surface later, the facts-be-damned.

Videographer and witness, Feidin Santana, (front row – center), with his attorney Todd Rutherford (rear) and Scott Family attorney Chris Stewart (right) debriefs with Scott Family after a long day of New York media interviews

[everything you are seeing on TV is being scripted by Ryan Julison]  

If Solicitor General Scarlett Wilson maintains the murder charge she is intentionally throwing the case. When/if this eventually reaches a courtroom, and given the currently known details, a jury will never overcome the three hurdles without reasonable doubt:

1.) The unlawful killing of another
2.) with malice aforethought
3.) and with specific intent to kill.

Officer Slager was of polite uneventful disposition during the vehicle stop and prior to the chase; if he had specific intent (to kill) he would never have needed to deploy the Taser (he could have just shot Scott); and nothing currently available proves malice or intent beyond a reasonable doubt. But, as previously stated, we’ll leave that aspect to legally minded folks like Mike McDaniel and others.

Our keen legal interest is only pertinent as it relates to how the TRUTH might be an impact upon it.

1.) At about 6 seconds into the video, we can see them struggling before the man runs from the cop.
2.) As he runs, and the cop is drawing his sidearm, there is clearly visible the cable from the taser hanging from the cops chest.
3.) as the suspect runs, something falls, and something connected to the taser wire is wrapped around the suspects ankle — or in his hand. (possibly a taser cartridge that came loose?)
4.) How can a cable be running from the cop’s chest to the suspect if he wasn’t shot with the taser by the suspect at some point? (confirming that aspect of the cop’s story)

Picture with the taser wire highlighted: