….. If there was one source of continuous animosity toward this site over the past 12 months it would honestly be defined around Mark O’Mara.   You see, once we discovered his lies and then watched his excuses, we just got to the point where we could no longer carry a false advocacy. 
It would be intellectually dishonest, and antithetical to everything we stand for.
We wrote about it in June 2012, and I have exhaustively requested all the O’Mara propagandists, those who would not believe their ears or eyes, to find an alternate discussion site ever since. We just cannot maintain the integrity of the Truthful research and constantly have the same circular argument about O’Mara’s character.
Today, as George awaits his fate, CNN broadcast a nine-part / pre-taped interview with Mark O’Mara (Transcript Here)  The emphasis is added by me:

Defense attorney Mark O’Mara just gave the most watched and likely most scrutinized closing argument of his career.  And now he’s been talking with our Martin Savidge, Martin joining me now from Sanford.

So, Martin, you spoke to George Zimmerman’s attorney for nearly an hour.

MARTIN SAVIDGE, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Right, yes. This was a very candid conversation.

Mark O’Mara has been no stranger when it comes to the media. But I think what makes this interview very unique, it was the fact that we conducted it with the idea that it was going to come out after the jury had gone into deliberations, in other words, after the defense and the prosecution had both rested.

This allowed Mark O’Mara to be the most candid I have ever heard him. There was nothing he would not talk about. And we talked about everything, whether it be race, whether it be about politics, whether it be about improprieties he saw from the side of the prosecution and about some of the witnesses, as well as some of the personalities including Judge Nelson.

So here is Mark O’Mara and our conversation. (more…)

Our Father, who art in heaven, hallowed be thy Name. Thy kingdom come. THY WILL BE DONE, on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us. And lead us not into temptation, but DELIVER US FROM EVIL.
For Thine is the kingdom and the power and the glory, forever and ever. Amen †

As we write there is a specific and coordinated effort to distance the Trayvon Martin family and narrative from the violence that may take place after the Trial Verdict is delivered. However, we have a fully researched library of their lies and obfuscations. Here are collected reposts from July    and    November last year in that regard:

The gig is up – The scheme is exposed – Their entire false story is coming apart at the seams schemes. – But they continue to lie to the bitter end – That is the story of the Trayvon Martin Family and Family Attorneys (Crump, Jackson, Parks et al). All they know is lying – They have invested themselves so much in the false story they cannot even cognitively tell the difference between their lies and the Truth. Unfortunately, the same holds true for their simple-minded, sheeple supporters.
Consider – Their Latest Claim: “they did not align with the Black Panthers”.

Whoopsie – Um, well lets take a look at this, shall we: The capacity of the Trayvon Martin supporters and Scheme Team to boldly lie is quite staggering. The latest *cough* claim from the schemers is their protestations that the Martin Family and family Attorneys did not support the New Black Panther Party.

This claim of “non-support” or “non-alliance” with the Black Panthers is actually quite representative of how far they will go to sell a story of fabrications, falsehoods and lies. It does not take our site to diminish their credibility, and expose their LIES – it just takes their own lying words and your eyes to bear witness. (more…)

As the jury deliberates, there’s a few things which can now be said.
I doubt it would ever be quite possible to explain, fully, the delicate balancing we have held regarding our research in all of the aspects of the Zimmerman case and the narratives intertwined within it.
However, after verdict we will be able to go to places we have reserved out of respect and prudence. The Defense team obviously has taken the position of staying down range from the media until the verdict is announced. We will not do, or say, anything to undercut that position.

But why is no-one inquiring about the absence of “TC”, as described by Rachel Jeantel? TC, as in TC O’Steen, the state investigator who drove to Jeantel’s home with Sybrina Fulton and Bernie De La Rionda. Or Dale Gilbreath, the state investigator who presented the evidence within the Probable Cause Affidavit? Or a host of other investigators, agents and assembled case identities from the State case, that are mysteriously absent in the trail list of witnesses. Not the least of which is the ‘whistleblower’ who, one would think, would have been a primary defense witness. After all, it was the State who introduced the phone records of Trayvon Martin – yet no-one from the defense ever challenged the “authentication” or “integrity” of the data used. Think about it. (more…)

Gee ya think? Every single behavior and personality trait of Debra Nelson screams Progressive Democrat –  Put this in the ‘water is wet’ column…..

(Via TSG) Years before they would endure a televised pummeling in the Florida courtroom of Judge Debra Nelson, the two lawyers representing accused murderer George Zimmerman actually donated money to the prickly jurist’s first election campaign, records show.
In 1999, Republican Governor Jeb Bush appointed Nelson, a lifelong Democrat, to fill a vacancy in the 18th Judicial Circuit (covering Seminole and Brevard counties). When Nelson ran the following year for a full six-year term, she donated 85 percent of her campaign’s $151,000 war chest. (read more)

Judge Nelson Gives Jury Instructions

Today, July 12th, is DAY #24 (of 5th week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case.
Yesterday the prosecution provide closing arguments (Summary HERE), today the defense attorney, Mark O’Mara will present his closing argument. Then the prosecution rebuttal.

Four Live Stream Links: (more…)

Today, July 12th, is DAY #24 (of 5th week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case.
Yesterday the prosecution provide closing arguments (Summary HERE), today the defense attorney, Mark O’Mara will present his closing argument. Then the prosecution rebuttal.

“We will have to wait to see what the evidence provides, my client believes he is not guilty”…. [Mark O’Mara – April 2012, after arrest]
“My client feels he is not a racist”….. [Mark O’Mara – May 2012]
“I cannot speak to his honesty, but George Zimmerman has definitely damaged his credibility, we’ll have to wait and see if he can recover it”…. [Mark O’Mara – June 2012, 2nd Bond]
“My client said he thinks he did nothing wrong”….. [Mark O’Mara – July 2012]
“The Stand Your Ground law is an absurd statute”…. [Mark O’Mara – August 2012]
“I don’t know if it is illegal, but there should be a law, or legislation written, to stop this type of thing”….. [Mark O’Mara – September 2012]
“If it was not for my client, George Zimmerman, he (Crump) and I would be on the same side in this issue”…. [Mark O’Mara – October 2012]
“My client was arrested, he should have been arrested, and so there is no reason to debate civil rights in this trial… [Mark O’Mara – November 2012]
“He’s probably not guilty of murder”… [Mark O’Mara – July 2013]

(more…)

WASHINGTON DC – Janet Napolitano, the U.S. secretary of Homeland Security and former governor of Arizona, is being named as the next president of the University of California system, in an unusual choice that brings a national-level politician to a position usually held by an academic. Her appointment also means the 10-campus system will be headed by a woman for the first time in its 145-year history.
Napolitano’s nomination by a committee of UC regents came after a secretive process that insiders said focused on her early as a high-profile, although untraditional, candidate who has led large public agencies and shown a strong interest in improving education. (more…)