Today, June 27th, is DAY #14 (of 3rd week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case. Yesterday Witness #8, Rachael Jeantel, did indeed take the stand. She will be back today to complete her testimony. This is the state’s key, and most important witness. This is also the witness we have exhaustively researched. Having quietly followed her social media, and having talked extensively, to her school classmates for over a year.
But before we discuss Jeantel, a summary: (more…)

Today, June 27th, is DAY #14 (of 3rd week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case. Yesterday Witness #8, Rachael Jeantel, did indeed take the stand. She will be back today to complete her testimony. This is the state’s key, and most important witness. This is also the witness we have exhaustively researched. Having quietly followed her social media, and having talked extensively, to her school classmates for over a year.
But before we discuss Jeantel, a summary: (more…)

Today, June 27th, is DAY #14 (of 3rd week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case. Yesterday Witness #8, Rachael Jeantel, did indeed take the stand. She will be back today to complete her testimony. This is the state’s key, and most important witness. This is also the witness we have exhaustively researched. Having quietly followed her social media, and having talked extensively, to her school classmates for over a year.
But before we discuss Jeantel, a summary: (more…)

Today, June 27th, is DAY #14 (of 3rd week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case. Yesterday Witness #8, Rachael Jeantel, did indeed take the stand. She will be back today to complete her testimony. This is the state’s key, and most important witness. This is also the witness we have exhaustively researched. Having quietly followed her social media, and having talked extensively, to her school classmates for over a year.
But before we discuss Jeantel, a summary: (more…)

Note to all. Yes, I am aware that now fingerprinting has been done, subsequent to Trayvon Martin’s autopsy, it is possible for Miami Dade PD to do a comparison against unsolved crimes in the immediate Miami Gardens area. No, the M-D PD have no interest in the subsequent liability such revelations would create for them. Hence, I believe it might be, part of the “slow walking” of the M-DSPD investigation public records, but not the primary part.  – and NO, I’m not going there – that’s for another time – I can only fight on one front at a time.

Yes, Rachel (W8) appears to have legal recourse against the Scheme Team for publicly broadcasting her 3/19/12 statement against her expressed desire not to have such done. Yes, ABC also holds such liability for broadcasting an interview made under conspicuous circumstances.

Yesterday you might have heard Witness #8 describe her historical relationship with Trayvon by saying: “he came around my area“.
This is further connection to something we have found multiple times in conversation with “kids” in the area.   This “my area” is also how Trayvon Martin and Kit Durrant connect to Rachel Jeantel.
As she told Don West at the beginning of cross examination:  “His friends would come into my neighborhood“, “we’re friends“, and she describes that re-familiarization (having not been good friends since 2006) as happening on her birthday 2/1/12.

Please don’t start putting out Rachel’s address or personal information on this site.  If you connect those dots yourself, keep them to yourself.  We are concerned about Rachel because we know the ire of her community if she “f__k’s this up”.

Rachel is 19, just finished 11th Grade, born and raised in Miami, Mom is from Haiti, and Dad is from Dominican Republic.  She lives with mom.

You may also have heard Witness #8 share that she found out on Monday 2/27/12 that Trayvon had died because of “rumors” coming from Krop High School, and she has “friends that go around his school“.    When asked by BDLR about her thoughts after finding out Trayvon was killed W8 shared: “It was just a fight broke out, it was, not taken serious, it was just a fight broke out“…

When describing why she lied to Sybrina, about not going to the wake, W8 says she felt “guilty, because she were the last person to talk to there son“.   There’s more there “there”.  A long time ago someone posed the theory that W8 egged Trayvon to put the bangaz on the cracka’z.  I have resisted the consideration – but I will now confirm, based on conversations in/around W8’s community, it is a more than plausible explanation. (more…)

Today, June 27th, is DAY #14 (of 3rd week) State of Florida V. George Zimmerman case.   Yesterday Witness #8, Rachael Jeantel, did indeed take the stand.   She will be back today to complete her testimony.   This is the state’s key, and most important witness.  This is also the witness we have exhaustively researched.   Having quietly followed her social media, and having talked extensively, to her school classmates for over a year.
But before we discuss Jeantel, a summary: (more…)

HOME.   Exhausted, but will be turning around to get back on the road at 4:00am.   {{Waving HI to my dual escorts – yeah, I saw ya today, so y’all can catch a nap til we leave again in the morning….}}   I think we are about 72 hours away from revealing that M-DSPD Leadership has intentionally blocked release of information out of risk management decisions.   This has created some even bigger issues.
For Treepers who have followed our research – you know of what I speak.   M-DSPD holds the key to both Witness #8 and Trayvon – vis-a-vis Baker act.
Sybrina Fulton is far more into this original narrative than I first thought.  I talked to 3 people today who confirmed  that Sybrina pressured the entire family of W8, and used the leverage from her coms with Miami-Dade BGI insiders, naacp etc, to put pressure on W8 and her family.   W8 wanted NOTHING to do with the scheme.   AND THIS IS A SCHEME.  (more…)

Originally posted March 5th upon finding out Witness 8 was never hospitalized:

ORLANDO – […] Attorneys for George Zimmerman were expected to ask his judge this morning to order the state’s most important witness, the young Miami woman who was on the phone with Trayvon Martin just before he was shot, to produce medical records.

However, defense lawyer Don West made a startling claim shortly after the hearing began: The state had revealed, before the hearing, that there are no medical records.

The woman, the defense lawyer said, “misrepresented” in a sworn statement that she missed Trayvon’s funeral because she had been hospitalized.

“In fact, she lied,” West said.

Prosecutor John Guy confirmed there will be no medical records, effectively confirming that there was no hospital trip. (more…)

Trayvon Martin family attorney, Benjamin Crump, is both an attorney for the Martin family, and simultaneously an identified, albeit unlisted, material witness in the case against George Zimmerman.

Crump is a material witness because of his specific and intentional engagement of Witness #8, Dee Dee, and her subsequent presentation to the State of Florida.

Benjamin Crump has also been assigned special status, as co-counsel of sorts, for the prosecution, by Florida Judge Nelson when she ruled he was not subject to deposition by the defense.

Subornation of Perjury – In American law and in Scots law the subornation of perjury is the crime of persuading a person to commit perjury — the swearing of a false oath to tell the truth in a legal proceeding, be it spoken or written. The term subornation of perjury further describes the circumstance wherein an attorney at law causes a client to lie, or allows another party to lie, under oath.

In legal practice, the condition of suborning perjury applies to a lawyer who presents either testimony or an affidavit, or both, either to a judge or to a jury, which the attorney knows to be materially false, and not factual.

In civil law and in criminal law, the attorney’s knowledge that the testimony is materially false must rise above mere suspicion to what an attorney would reasonably have believed in the circumstances of the matter discussed in the testimony. Hence, the attorney cannot be wilfully blind to the fact that his or her witness is giving false, perjurious testimony.

Moreover, an attorney who actively encourages a witness to give false testimony is suborning perjury, which is a crime punished either with formal disciplinary action, disbarment, or jail, or a combination thereof.

Likewise, a false statement by an attorney in court also is a crime similar to subornation of perjury, and is punished accordingly. Hence, in the professional conduct of an attorney at law, there is a fine delineation between assisting a witness to recall occurred events and encouraging him or her to give materially false testimony. (more…)