This type of article (below) is reflective of what drives the “racist” messaging into the mainstream psyche. Insufferable arrogance and elitism on display. According to the pontificating writer any/all opposition to President Obama is based on racism. This is beyond insufferable, well beyond.
The internal pressure on the legacy, ivory-towered and liberal academia, to produce students suffering from the infection of white-guilt, leads to generational breeding of this ideological genetic disconnect.
True racism is placing “skin color” or “ethnicity” ahead of any other form of disagreement, OR agreement, in ideology.
Consequently a determinative belief that opposition to any ideology cannot be based on any other form of disagreement than color or ethnicity is, by itself, racism. Indeed, it is just as racist to state a person is incapable of their own ideological definitions of disparity. Not only is it racist to claim any opposition MUST be based on race, but it is also racist to claim that ALL opposition can only be based on race. Hence, progressives are the most racist people on earth.
(Associated Press) […] The question of whether race fuels opposition to President Barack Obama has become one of the most divisive topics of the election. It is sowing anger and frustration among conservatives who are labeled racist simply for opposing Obama’s policies and liberals who see no other explanation for such deep dislike of the president.
It is an accusation almost impossible to prove, yet it remains inseparable from the African-American experience. The idea, which seemed to die in 2008 when Obama became the first black president, is now rearing its head from college campuses to cable TV as the Democratic incumbent faces Mitt Romney, the white Republican challenger. (more…)

The podium at the DNC was just like the podium in Bagdad Iraq circa 


